Effects of Unilateral Endoscopic Facetectomy on Spinal Stability Scott M

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Effects of Unilateral Endoscopic Facetectomy on Spinal Stability Scott M ORIGINAL ARTICLE Effects of Unilateral Endoscopic Facetectomy on Spinal Stability Scott M. W. Haufe, MD and Anthony R. Mork, MD that are common in the normal aging spine.5 Thus, the Abstract: There are various definitions for spinal instability and exact method of determining spinal instability is unclear its exact clinical usefulness is uncertain. Facetectomy has been and it has been suggested that instability may not be very considered a potential source of instability via conventional helpful in clinical practice.5 Other studies have shown that approaches. Studies have suggested that if the ligament structure processes of aging such as spinal disc degeneration does of the spine is maintained then instability may not occur with an not directly correlate to mobility changes and that what endoscopic facetectomy. This study is a prospective analysis of could be defined as instability may be present in normal 10 patients who underwent unilateral endoscopic facetectomy situations.6 Therefore, even though prior data are for the treatment of severe foraminal stenosis to determine questionable about the usage of the term stability, it has whether endoscopic facetectomies result in instability. The been believed that any significant removal of the facet patients underwent pre and postsurgical x-rays that were joint is associated with some degree of instability of the evaluated via a specialized computer program that determined vertebral spine.7 Nonetheless, most of these beliefs of whether or not there was any altered mobility between the 2 sets possible instability after facetectomy were due to the of x-rays. These were compared with controls to determine extensive surgical techniques required via a conventional whether instability was present. Of the 10 endoscopic facetect- approach.8,9 Important structural ligaments that can be omy patients, none had any statistically significant change in affected with conventional facetectomy include the sagittal rotational or translational motion when compared to supraspinous, interspinous, and intertransverse ligaments controls. Thus, endoscopic removal of a unilateral facet joint along with the superficial thoracolumbar fascia and does not necessarily cause spinal instability possibly because of various interspinous muscles depending on the approach the reduction in tissue damage associated with an endoscopic and technique.10 It has been suggested that unilateral approach and the maintenance of the ligament structure of the facetectomy may not cause instability in certain situations spine. when minimal ligament damage occurs.11 This has been Key Words: minimally invasive spinal surgery, endoscopic spinal confirmed in a study that revealed that a 1-level unilateral surgery, facetectomy, foraminal stenosis, instability conventional lumbar facetectomy could be performed with minimal instability issues if care is used to preserve (J Spinal Disord Tech 2007;20:146–148) structural integrity.12 Using a conventional facetectomy with a tissue sparing approach, only one case of instability requiring fusion was noted out of 41 patients.12 pinal stability after conventional spinal surgery has It is unknown whether a minimally invasive approach, Salways been an issue with spinal surgeons. Many which has been previously defined as having an incision surgeries have been performed over the issue yet there is of less than an inch, could allow a facetectomy to be no real definition of what constitutes spinal instability.1 A performed with similar instability effects as those seen study by Pope et al2 defined instability as a loss of stiffness with a tissue sparing conventional approach since the of the spine but such a definition is too vague. One of the trauma to the ligaments and other structural elements more accepted definitions expresses a 3-subsystem that would be reduced.11,13–15 Here, we present an analysis of includes the spinal column, the spinal muscles, and the 10 patients who underwent an endoscopic facetectomy for neutral control unit.3,4 Other definitions of instability foraminal stenosis. include increased antero-posterior translation, pathologic coupled motion, increased neutral zone, or pathologic instantaneous center of rotation, but these are findings MATERIALS AND METHODS Ten patients consisting of 7 men and 3 women who required a unilateral facetectomy for unilateral foraminal Received for publication April 20, 2006; accepted July 24, 2006. spinal stenosis were selected for the study. Although From the MicroSpine Center, DeFuniak Springs, FL 32435. unilateral facetectomy is not always required for for- Reprints: Scott M. W. Haufe, MD, MicroSpine Center, 100 Coy Burgess Loop, DeFuniak Springs, FL 32435 (e-mail: Question@MicroSpine. aminal stenosis, the patients selected had severe cases that com). required such an extensive procedure and they opted Copyright r 2007 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins for the minimally invasive approach instead of a 146 J Spinal Disord Tech Volume 20, Number 2, April 2007 J Spinal Disord Tech Volume 20, Number 2, April 2007 Effects of Unilateral Endoscopic Facetectomy conventional fusion with facetectomy. The diagnosis neurologic complications. The entire procedure takes confirmed foraminal stenosis via history, physical around 1 hour. examination, magnetic resonance imaging, and selective Patients were reevaluated with the same 10-view nerve root blocks. Selective nerve root block were used spinal series 2 years after the initial surgery. No other to confirm that the patient’s pain was indeed from spinal surgeries occurred in any of these patients during the problematic nerve root. The selective nerve root this 2-year span. Ten nonsurgical patients were used as blocks involved 1% lidocaine and were deemed positive controls and 2 sets of the same 10-view spinal x-ray series if the patient’s pain was resolved after the injection were obtained on these spinal control subjects at a similar for at least 1 hour. In each patient, their pain returned 2-year period apart from each other. The spinal x-ray to their normal baseline after the injection and thus series were sent to a medical school that had developed a the injection was not deemed therapeutic, only special computer program that could analyze the x-rays diagnostic. Before surgery, patients underwent a 10-view for aberrations in spinal mobility. Because variations in lumbar spinal series that included anterior-posterior the x-ray films can occur owing to patient positioning and (AP), lateral, right and left posterior obliques, flexion, technique, the computerized program used to determine extension, right and left AP bending, L5-S1 spot, spinal instability was able to determine the changes in the and pelvis views. These same x-ray views were obtained angles of the spine associated with these human errors in each patient 2 years after the surgery. No other and thus compensate for them. The program marks spinal surgeries occurred in these individuals during the specific points on the spinal segments and can adjust for 2-year period after this endoscopic lumbar facetectomy angulations and positions of the patient and can correct surgery. for technique and position shifts. The computer program The surgery proceeded as follows: fluoroscopy was and the medical school analysis staff were blinded to used to identify the facet joint at approximately a 30- which x-ray studies were from which group of patients degree angle to the spine. At this location, a 3/4-inch since names and dates were removed. The computer incision was made and a 1.5 mm guide pin was inserted program used the angle of sagittal rotation displacement and tapped into the facet joint. The endoscopic approach and sagittal translation displacement from the extension involved a specialized 14 mm tubular retractor system to flexion films. The units for flexion-extension were given that was inserted over the guide pin to the facet joint. The in degrees, whereas the units for translation being final tube constituted the working tube and the other expressed in percent change in vertical depth of the dilating tubes were removed. Electrocautery and a vertebral body. These data are noted in Table 1 for the holmium laser were used to cauterize, coagulate, and surgical group. Although there is no perfect way to remove soft tissues over the facet joint. Once the joint was analyze instability, this method of measuring spinal identified via a 5-mm, 0-degree endoscope with a 30 times stability has been previously referenced and deemed magnification system, an electronic 12 mm drill bit acceptable for this study.16 The control group is removed the facet joint under direct fluoroscopic gui- referenced in Table 2 with the same information. dance using AP and lateral views to confirm 3 dimen- sional placement. After the 12 mm bit removed most of RESULTS the facet joint, a 6 mm electrical burr was used to grind away the excess facet bone and kerrisons (2 to 4 mm) were Of the 10 patients who underwent the unilateral used to remove the final bone edges and pieces. The entire endoscopic facetectomy, none developed any statistically facet region was removed and the patients were awake significant motion abnormalities when compared with the during the entire procedure to aid in avoiding any control group. Both sagittal translation and rotation had TABLE 1. Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Facetectomy Presurgical Patient Surgical Rotation Pretranslation No. Level (Degrees) (%) Postrotation Posttranslation 1 L5-S1 4.36 À 0.0063 5.25 0.0526 2 L4-5 1.81 À 0.0473 5.49 0.0536 3 L4-5 6.04 À 0.1152 1.8 0.0602 4 L4-5 1.79 À 0.268 À 0.71 À 0.0359 5 L4-5 10.34 0.0384 7.45 0.0961 6 L5-S1 1.12 À 0.0837 1.13 À 0.0105 7 L4-5 0.96 0.0587 5.22 0.0225 8 L4-5 8.08 0.1411 4.08 À 0.1034 9 L5-S1 0.95 À 0.1117 4.06 0.1005 10 L4-5 4.88 À 0.0302 À 0.54 À 0.0513 Information is for each patient and includes level of surgery and pre and postrotation and translation values.
Recommended publications
  • Musculoskeletal Program CPT Codes and Descriptions
    Musculoskeletal Program CPT Codes and Descriptions Spine Surgery Procedure Codes CPT CODES DESCRIPTION Allograft, morselized, or placement of osteopromotive material, for spine surgery only (List separately in addition 20930 to code for primary procedure) 20931 Allograft, structural, for spine surgery only (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) Autograft for spine surgery only (includes harvesting the graft); local (eg, ribs, spinous process, or laminar 20936 fragments) obtained from same incision (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) Autograft for spine surgery only (includes harvesting the graft); morselized (through separate skin or fascial 20937 incision) (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) Autograft for spine surgery only (includes harvesting the graft); structural, bicortical or tricortical (through separate 20938 skin or fascial incision) (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) 20974 Electrical stimulation to aid bone healing; noninvasive (nonoperative) Osteotomy of spine, posterior or posterolateral approach, 3 columns, 1 vertebral segment (eg, pedicle/vertebral 22206 body subtraction); thoracic Osteotomy of spine, posterior or posterolateral approach, 3 columns, 1 vertebral segment (eg, pedicle/vertebral 22207 body subtraction); lumbar Osteotomy of spine, posterior or posterolateral approach, 3 columns, 1 vertebral segment (eg, pedicle/vertebral 22208 body subtraction); each additional vertebral segment (List separately in addition to code for
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Guidelines
    CLINICAL GUIDELINES Interventional Pain Management Services Version 1.0.2019 Clinical guidelines for medical necessity review of comprehensive musculoskeletal management services. © 2019 eviCore healthcare. All rights reserved. Regence: Comprehensive Musculoskeletal Management Guidelines V1.0.2019 Interventional Pain Management CMM-200: Epidural Steroid Injections (ESI) 3 CMM-201: Facet Joint Injections/Medial Branch Blocks 17 CMM-202: Trigger Point Injections 21 CMM-203: Sacroiliac Joint Injections 32 CMM-204: Prolotherapy 37 CMM-207: Epidural Adhesiolysis 40 CMM-208: Radiofrequency Joint Ablations/Denervations 44 CMM-209: Regional Sympathetic Blocks 51 CMM 210: Implantable Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems 57 CMM-211: Spinal Cord Stimulators 65 CMM-308: Thermal Intradiscal Procedures 66 CMM-310: Manipulation of the Spine Under Anesthesia 71 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ © 2019 eviCore healthcare. All Rights Reserved. Page 2 of 73 400 Buckwalter Place Boulevard, Bluffton, SC 29910 (800) 918-8924 www.eviCore.com Regence: Comprehensive Musculoskeletal Management Guidelines V1.0.2019 CMM-200: Epidural Steroid Injections (ESI) CMM-200.1: Definitions 4 CMM-200.2: General Guidelines 5 CMM-200.3: Indications: Selective Nerve Root Block (SNRB) 6 CMM-200.4: Indications: Epidural Steroid Injections 7 CMM-200.5: Non-Indications: SNRB 8 CMM-200.6: Non-Indications: ESI 8 ® CMM-200.7: Procedure (CPT ) Codes 9 CMM-200.8: References 10 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • TESSYS Technique with Small Grade of Facetectomy Has Potential Biomechanical Advantages Compared to the In-Out TED with Intact Articular Process : an In-Silico Study
    TESSYS Technique With Small Grade of Facetectomy Has Potential Biomechanical Advantages Compared to the In-Out TED With Intact Articular Process : An In-Silico Study Jingchi Li West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine for Sichuan University Chen Xu Changzheng Hospital Aliated to the Naval Medical University Xiaoyu Zhang Aliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine for Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine Zhipeng Xi Aliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine for Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine Mengnan Liu Macau University of Science and Technology Zhongxin Fang Xihua University Nan Wang Aliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine for Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine Lin Xie ( [email protected] ) Aliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine for Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine Yueming Song West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine for Sichuan University Research Article Keywords: Biomechanical deterioration, Transforaminal endoscopic discectomy, Endoscopic dynamic drill, Facetectomy, Iatrogenic annulus injury Posted Date: April 26th, 2021 Page 1/27 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-429749/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Version of Record: A version of this preprint was published at BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders on July 10th, 2021. See the published version at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04504-1. Page 2/27 Abstract Background: The facetectomy was reported as an important procedure in both in-out and out-in (i.e. transforaminal endoscopic spine system (TESSYS)) techniques in the transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (TED), and which was also related to the deterioration of postoperative biomechanical environment and related poor prognosis.
    [Show full text]
  • Priority Health Spine and Joint Code List
    Priority Health Joint Services Code List Category CPT® Code CPT® Code Description Joint Services 23000 Removal of subdeltoid calcareous deposits, open Joint Services 23020 Capsular contracture release (eg, Sever type procedure) Joint Services 23120 Claviculectomy; partial Joint Services 23130 Acromioplasty or acromionectomy, partial, with or without coracoacromial ligament release Joint Services 23410 Repair of ruptured musculotendinous cuff (eg, rotator cuff) open; acute Joint Services 23412 Repair of ruptured musculotendinous cuff (eg, rotator cuff) open;chronic Joint Services 23415 Coracoacromial ligament release, with or without acromioplasty Joint Services 23420 Reconstruction of complete shoulder (rotator) cuff avulsion, chronic (includes acromioplasty) Joint Services 23430 Tenodesis of long tendon of biceps Joint Services 23440 Resection or transplantation of long tendon of biceps Joint Services 23450 Capsulorrhaphy, anterior; Putti-Platt procedure or Magnuson type operation Joint Services 23455 Capsulorrhaphy, anterior;with labral repair (eg, Bankart procedure) Joint Services 23460 Capsulorrhaphy, anterior, any type; with bone block Joint Services 23462 Capsulorrhaphy, anterior, any type;with coracoid process transfer Joint Services 23465 Capsulorrhaphy, glenohumeral joint, posterior, with or without bone block Joint Services 23466 Capsulorrhaphy, glenohumeral joint, any type multi-directional instability Joint Services 23470 ARTHROPLASTY, GLENOHUMERAL JOINT; HEMIARTHROPLASTY ARTHROPLASTY, GLENOHUMERAL JOINT; TOTAL SHOULDER [GLENOID
    [Show full text]
  • Musculoskeletal Surgical Procedures Requiring Prior Authorization (Effective 11.1.2020)
    Musculoskeletal Surgical Procedures Requiring Prior Authorization (Effective 11.1.2020) Procedure Code Description ACL Repair 27407 Repair, primary, torn ligament and/or capsule, knee; cruciate ACL Repair 27409 Repair, primary, torn ligament and/or capsule, knee; collateral and cruciate ligaments ACL Repair 29888 Arthroscopically aided anterior cruciate ligament repair/augmentation or reconstruction Acromioplasty and Rotator Cuff Repair 23130 Acromioplasty Or Acromionectomy, Partial, With Or Without Coracoacromial Ligament Release Acromioplasty and Rotator Cuff Repair 23410 Repair of ruptured musculotendinous cuff (eg, rotator cuff) open; acute Acromioplasty and Rotator Cuff Repair 23412 Repair of ruptured musculotendinous cuff (eg, rotator cuff) open; chronic Acromioplasty and Rotator Cuff Repair 23415 Coracoacromial Ligament Release, With Or Without Acromioplasty Acromioplasty and Rotator Cuff Repair 23420 Reconstruction of complete shoulder (rotator) cuff avulsion, chronic (includes acromioplasty) Arthroscopy, Shoulder, Surgical; Decompression Of Subacromial Space With Partial Acromioplasty, With Coracoacromial Ligament (Ie, Arch) Release, When Performed (List Separately In Addition Acromioplasty and Rotator Cuff Repair 29826 To Code For Primary Procedure) Acromioplasty and Rotator Cuff Repair 29827 Arthroscopy, shoulder, surgical; with rotator cuff repair Allograft for Spinal Fusion [BMP] 20930 Allograft, morselized, or placement of osteopromotive material, for spine surgery only Ankle Fusion 27870 Arthrodesis, ankle, open Ankle Fusion
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnosis and Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation with Radiculopathy
    Y Lumbar Disc Herniation with Radiculopathy | NASS Clinical Guidelines 1 G Evidence-Based Clinical Guidelines for Multidisciplinary ETHODOLO Spine Care M NE I DEL I U /G ON Diagnosis and Treatment of I NTRODUCT Lumbar Disc I Herniation with Radiculopathy NASS Evidence-Based Clinical Guidelines Committee D. Scott Kreiner, MD Paul Dougherty, II, DC Committee Chair, Natural History Chair Robert Fernand, MD Gary Ghiselli, MD Steven Hwang, MD Amgad S. Hanna, MD Diagnosis/Imaging Chair Tim Lamer, MD Anthony J. Lisi, DC John Easa, MD Daniel J. Mazanec, MD Medical/Interventional Treatment Chair Richard J. Meagher, MD Robert C. Nucci, MD Daniel K .Resnick, MD Rakesh D. Patel, MD Surgical Treatment Chair Jonathan N. Sembrano, MD Anil K. Sharma, MD Jamie Baisden, MD Jeffrey T. Summers, MD Shay Bess, MD Christopher K. Taleghani, MD Charles H. Cho, MD, MBA William L. Tontz, Jr., MD Michael J. DePalma, MD John F. Toton, MD This clinical guideline should not be construed as including all proper methods of care or excluding or other acceptable methods of care reason- ably directed to obtaining the same results. The ultimate judgment regarding any specific procedure or treatment is to be made by the physi- cian and patient in light of all circumstances presented by the patient and the needs and resources particular to the locality or institution. I NTRODUCT 2 Lumbar Disc Herniation with Radiculopathy | NASS Clinical Guidelines I ON Financial Statement This clinical guideline was developed and funded in its entirety by the North American Spine Society (NASS). All participating /G authors have disclosed potential conflicts of interest consistent with NASS’ disclosure policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Indications for Lumbar Total Disc Replacement: Selecting the Right Patient with the Right Indication for the Right Total Disc
    Indications for Lumbar Total Disc Replacement: Selecting the Right Patient with the Right Indication for the Right Total Disc Karin Büttner-Janz, Dr.med., Prof., Richard D. Guyer and Donna D. Ohnmeiss, Dr.Med. Int J Spine Surg 2014, 8 () doi: https://doi.org/10.14444/1012 http://ijssurgery.com/content/8/12 This information is current as of September 24, 2021. Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://ijssurgery.com/alerts The International Journal of Spine Surgery 2397 Waterbury Circle, Suite 1, Aurora, IL 60504, Phone: +1-630-375-1432 © 2014 ISASS. All RightsDownloaded Reserved. from http://ijssurgery.com/ by guest on September 24, 2021 This article generously published free of charge by the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Downloaded from http://ijssurgery.com/ by guest on September 24, 2021 Indications for Lumbar Total Disc Replacement: Selecting the Right Patient with the Right Indication for the Right Total Disc Karin Büttner-Janz, Dr.med., Prof.,1 Richard D. Guyer, MD,2 Donna D. Ohnmeiss, Dr.Med.3 1Büttner-Janz Spinefoundation, Berlin, Germany; 2Texas Back Institute, Plano, Texas; 3Texas Back Institute Research Foundation, Plano, Texas Abstract Summary of Background Data As with any surgery, care should be taken to determine patient selection criteria for lumbar TDR based on safety and optimizing outcome. These goals may initially be addressed by analyzing biomechanical implant function and early clinical experience, ongoing evaluation is needed to refine indications. Objective The purpose of this work was to synthesize information published on general indications for lumbar TDR.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Musculoskeletal Codes
    Updated January 2018 Commercial Musculoskeletal Codes Investigational or Non-Covered Spine Surgery Pain Management Joint Surgery Codes associated with an Arthrogram CPT Description Commercial Notes Partial excision of posterior vertebral component (eg, spinous 22100 process, lamina or facet) for intrinsic bony lesion, single vertebral segment; cervical 22101 Partial excision of posterior vertebral component (eg, spinous process, lamina or facet) for intrinsic bony lesion, single vertebral segment; thoracic 22102 Partial excision of posterior vertebral component (eg, spinous process, lamina or facet) for intrinsic bony lesion, single vertebral segment; lumbar Partial excision of posterior vertebral component (eg, spinous process, 22103 lamina or facet) for intrinsic bony lesion, single vertebral segment; each additional segment (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) Partial excision of vertebral body, for intrinsic bony lesion, without 22110 decompression of spinal cord or nerve root(s), single vertebral segment;cervical Partial excision of vertebral body, for intrinsic bony lesion, without 22112 decompression of spinal cord or nerve root(s), single vertebral segment; thoracic Partial excision of vertebral body, for intrinsic bony lesion, without 22114 decompression of spinal cord or nerve root(s), single vertebral segment; lumbar each additional vertebral segment (list separately in addition to code 22116 for primary procedure) Osteotomy of spine, posterior or posterolateral approach, 3 columns, 22206 1 vertebral
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial MSK Procedure Code List Effective 09.01.21.Xlsx
    Effective 09/01/21 BCBST Commercial Musculoskeletal/Pain Management Procedure Codes Investigational or Non-Covered Spine Surgery Pain Management Joint Surgery CPT Description Commercial Notes 20930 Allograft for spine surgery only morselized Computer-assisted surgical navigational procedure for musculoskeletal Investigational Per BCBST Medical 20985 procedures, image-less (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) Policy Osteotomy of spine, posterior or posterolateral approach, 3 columns, 1 vertebral 22206 segment (eg, pedicle/vertebral body subtraction); thoracic Osteotomy of spine, posterior approach, 3 columns, 1 vertebral segment (eg. 22207 Pedicle/vertebral body subtraction);lumbar Osteotomy of spine, posterior or posterolateral approach, 3 columns, 1 vertebral 22208 segment (eg, pedicle/vertebral body subtraction); each additional vertebral segment (list separately in addition to code for primary procedure) Osteotomy of spine, posterior or posterolateral approach, one vertebral segment; 22210 cervical Osteotomy of spine, posterior or posterolateral approach, 1 vertebral segment; 22212 thoracic Osteotomy of spine, posterior or posterolateral approach, 1 vertebral segment; 22214 lumbar Osteotomy of spine, posterior or posterolateral approach, 1 vertebral segment; 22216 each additional vertebral segment (List separately in addition to primary procedure) Osteotomy of spine, including discectomy anterior approach, single vertebral 22220 segment; cervical Osteotomy of spine, including discectomy, anterior approach, single
    [Show full text]
  • The Comprehensive Anatomical Spinal Osteotomy and Anterior Column Realignment Classification
    CLINICAL ARTICLE J Neurosurg Spine 29:565–575, 2018 The comprehensive anatomical spinal osteotomy and anterior column realignment classification Presented at the 2018 AANS/CNS Joint Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves Juan S. Uribe, MD,1 Frank Schwab, MD,2 Gregory M. Mundis Jr., MD,3 David S. Xu, MD,1 Jacob Januszewski, DO,4 Adam S. Kanter, MD,5 David O. Okonkwo, MD, PhD,5 Serena S. Hu, MD,6 Deviren Vedat, MD,7 Robert Eastlack, MD,3 Pedro Berjano, MD, PhD,8 and Praveen V. Mummaneni, MD9 1Department of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona; 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York; 3San Diego Spine Foundation, La Jolla, California; 4Orlando Neurosurgery, Orlando, Florida; 5Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; 6Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Departments of 7Orthopaedic Surgery and 9Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California; and 8IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy OBJECTIVE Spinal osteotomies and anterior column realignment (ACR) are procedures that allow preservation or restoration of spine lordosis. Variations of these techniques enable different degrees of segmental, regional, and global sagittal realignment. The authors propose a comprehensive anatomical classification system for ACR and its variants based on the level of technical complexity and invasiveness. This serves as a common language and platform to stan- dardize clinical and radiographic outcomes for the utilization of ACR. METHODS The proposed classification is based on 6 anatomical grades of ACR, including anterior longitudinal liga- ment (ALL) release, with varying degrees of posterior column release or osteotomies.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Nuvasive® Reimbursement Guide
    2018 NuVasive® Reimbursement Guide Assisting physicians and facilities in accurate billing for NuVasive implants and instrumentation systems. 2018 Reimbursement Guide Contents I. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................2 II. Physician Coding and Payment ......................................................................................................................................2 Fusion Facilitating Technologies ............................................................................................................................................. 2 NVM5® Intraoperative Monitoring System ........................................................................................................................... 12 III. Hospital Inpatient Coding and Payment ....................................................................................................................13 NuVasive® Technology ..........................................................................................................................................................13 Non-Medicare Reimbursement ............................................................................................................................................13 IV. Outpatient Facility Coding and Payment ..................................................................................................................14 Hospital Outpatient
    [Show full text]
  • Description of Procedure Price ARTHROSCOPY, SHOULDER
    ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES- PROFESSIONAL FEES ONLY Description of Procedure Price ARTHROSCOPY, SHOULDER, GLENOHUMERAL JT $ 4,152 CLAVICULAR FX, ORIF $ 2,054 BIOPSY, SOFT TISSUE, UPPER ARM/ELBOW $ 1,155 EXCISION, TUMOR, SOFT TISSUE OF UPPER ARM OR ELBOW $ 1,099 DEBRIDEMENT MUSCLE FASCIA < 20 SQ CM $ 444 REINSERTION, RUPTURED BICEPS/TRICPS TEND $ 2,207 REPAIR LATERAL COLLATERAL LIGAMENT, ELBOW $ 1,917 DEBRIDE LAT/MED ELBOW $ 1,494 TENOTOMY, ELBOW, LATERAL OR MEDIAL (EG, EPICONDYLITIS, TENNIS ELBOW, GOLFER'S ELBOW); DEBRIDEMENT, SOFT TISSUE AND/OR BONE, OPEN WITH TENDON REPAIR OR REATTACHMENT $ 1,785 DEBRIDEMENT BONE MUSCLE/FASCIA <20 SQCM $ 659 INCISION, EXTENSOR TENDON SHEATH, WRIS $ 912 DECOMPRESSION FASCIOTOMY, FOREARM AND/OR WRIST $ 1,545 DEBRIDEMENT BONE EA ADDL 20 SQCM $ 285 EXCISION OR CURETTAGE OF BONE CYST OR BENIGN TUMOR $ 1,502 CARPECTOMY; ALL BONES OF PROXIMAL ROW $ 1,668 REPAIR OF NONUNION OR MALUNION, RADIUS OR ULNA $ 2,170 ARTHROPLASTY, INTERPOSITION, INTERCARPAL OR CPM $ 2,237 INCISIONAL BIOPSY OF SKIN (EG, WEDGE) $ 163 OPEN TRMT OF DISTAL RADIAL FX $ 2,102 ORIF DISTAL RADIOUS INTRA-ARTICULAR $ 2,347 TENDON SHEATH INCISION; FINGERS/HAND $ 874 REPAIR EXTENSOR TENDON WO GRAFT $ 1,597 TRANSFER OR TRANSPLANT OF TENDON, CARPOMETACARPAL $ 1,988 PERCUTANEOUS SKELETAL FIX UNSTABLE PHALANGE $ 1,333 OPEN TX PHALANGEAL FX $ 1,710 AMPUTATION, FINGER OR THUMB, PRIMARY OR SECONDARY $ 1,710 HIP ARTHROPLASTY $ 3,884 REVISION, TOTAL HIP $ 5,490 REVISION, THA, ACETABULUM $ 4,219 REVISON, THA, FEMUR $ 4,383 UNSPECIFIED PROCEDURE ON HIP $ 2,673
    [Show full text]