DOCSLIB.ORG

Description of Procedure Price ARTHROSCOPY, SHOULDER

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES- PROFESSIONAL FEES ONLY Description of Procedure Price ARTHROSCOPY, SHOULDER, GLENOHUMERAL JT $ 4,152 CLAVICULAR FX, ORIF $ 2,054 BIOPSY, SOFT TISSUE, UPPER ARM/ELBOW $ 1,155 EXCISION, TUMOR, SOFT TISSUE OF UPPER ARM OR ELBOW $ 1,099 DEBRIDEMENT MUSCLE FASCIA < 20 SQ CM $ 444 REINSERTION, RUPTURED BICEPS/TRICPS TEND $ 2,207 REPAIR LATERAL COLLATERAL LIGAMENT, ELBOW $ 1,917 DEBRIDE LAT/MED ELBOW $ 1,494 TENOTOMY, ELBOW, LATERAL OR MEDIAL (EG, EPICONDYLITIS, TENNIS ELBOW, GOLFER'S ELBOW); DEBRIDEMENT, SOFT TISSUE AND/OR BONE, OPEN WITH TENDON REPAIR OR REATTACHMENT $ 1,785 DEBRIDEMENT BONE MUSCLE/FASCIA <20 SQCM $ 659 INCISION, EXTENSOR TENDON SHEATH, WRIS $ 912 DECOMPRESSION FASCIOTOMY, FOREARM AND/OR WRIST $ 1,545 DEBRIDEMENT BONE EA ADDL 20 SQCM $ 285 EXCISION OR CURETTAGE OF BONE CYST OR BENIGN TUMOR $ 1,502 CARPECTOMY; ALL BONES OF PROXIMAL ROW $ 1,668 REPAIR OF NONUNION OR MALUNION, RADIUS OR ULNA $ 2,170 ARTHROPLASTY, INTERPOSITION, INTERCARPAL OR CPM $ 2,237 INCISIONAL BIOPSY OF SKIN (EG, WEDGE) $ 163 OPEN TRMT OF DISTAL RADIAL FX $ 2,102 ORIF DISTAL RADIOUS INTRA-ARTICULAR $ 2,347 TENDON SHEATH INCISION; FINGERS/HAND $ 874 REPAIR EXTENSOR TENDON WO GRAFT $ 1,597 TRANSFER OR TRANSPLANT OF TENDON, CARPOMETACARPAL $ 1,988 PERCUTANEOUS SKELETAL FIX UNSTABLE PHALANGE $ 1,333 OPEN TX PHALANGEAL FX $ 1,710 AMPUTATION, FINGER OR THUMB, PRIMARY OR SECONDARY $ 1,710 HIP ARTHROPLASTY $ 3,884 REVISION, TOTAL HIP $ 5,490 REVISION, THA, ACETABULUM $ 4,219 REVISON, THA, FEMUR $ 4,383 UNSPECIFIED PROCEDURE ON HIP $ 2,673 ARTHROTOMY, KNEE, WITH EXPLORATION, DRAINAGE, OR FB REMOVAL $ 1,977 SUTURE OF INFRAPATELLAR TENDON; PRIMARY $ 1,614 MEDIAL COLLATERAL LIGAMENT REPAIR $ 1,921 RECONSTRUCTION JT DISLOCATE PATELLA $ 2,126 LATERAL RETINACULAR RELEASE $ 1,282 ARTHROPLASTY, PATELLA; WITH PROSTHESIS $ 2,332 ARTHROPLASTY, PARTIAL KNEE $ 3,316 TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY $ 3,824 REVISION OF TKA $ 4,024 REVISION TKA; FEMORAL/ENTIRE TIBIAL CMPT $ 5,025 REMOVAL OF PROSTHESIS $ 3,439 ORIF PATELLA FX $ 2,145 OPEN TREATMENT INTERCONDYLAR SPINES OF TIBIA W/INTERNAL FIXATION $ 2,244 MANIPULATION KNEE JT GEN ANESTHESIA $ 431 UNLISTED PROCEDURE, FEMUR OR KNEE $ 876 REPAIR, RUPTURED ACHILLES TENDON $ 1,827 REPAIR FLEXOR TENDON WO GRFT $ 1,061 REPAIR, SECONDARY, LIGAMENT, ANKLE, COLL $ 1,822 REMOVAL ANKLE IMPLANT $ 1,639 OPEN TX MEDIAL MALLEOLUS FX W/INTERNAL FIXATION $ 1,688 OPEN TX DISTAL FIB FX $ 1,534 OPEN TX, BIMALLEOLAR FX W/INTERNAL FIX $ 2,202 OPEN TREATMENT OF TRIMALLEOLAR ANKLE FRACTURE $ 2,322 OPEN TX DISTAL TIB/FIB JT $ 1,955 OSTECTOMY, CALCANEUS $ 1,152 BONE EXCISION, PARTIAL;TALUS/CALC $ 1,409 REPAIR, TENDON, FLEXOR FOOT $ 898 TENOTOMY LENGTH/ABD HALLUCIS $ 817 CORRECTION, HALLUS VALGUS $ 1,483 OSTEOTOMY 1ST METAR (BUNIONECTOMY) $ 1,140 AMPUTATION, METATARSAL,W/TOE, SGL $ 1,235 AMPUTATION, MTP JOINT $ 1,130 ARTHROSCOPY, SHOULDER $ 1,346 ARTHROSCOPY, SHOULDER: CAPSULORRHAPHY $ 3,051 ARTHROSCOPY, SHOULDER: RPR SLAP LESION $ 2,978 SURGICAL REMOVAL OF LOOSE FB $ 1,681 ARTHROSCOPY, SHOULDER, SURGICAL; DEBRIDEMENT, EXTENSIVE $ 1,719 ARTHROSCOPY, SHOULDER, DISTAL CLAVICULEC $ 1,913 ARTHROSCOPY, SHOULDER W/LIG RELEASE $ 499 ARTHROSCOPY SHLDR ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR $ 2,482 ARTHROSCOPY, SHOULDER, BICEPS TENODESIS $ 2,620 ARTHROSCOPY, ELBOW, SURGICAL; DEBRIDEMENT, EXTENSIVE $ 1,589 ARTHROSCOPY, WRIST, SURGICAL; FOR INFECTION, LAVAGE AND DRAINAGE $ 1,349 ENDOSCOPY, WRIST, SURGICAL, W/RELEASE TRANSVERSE CARPAL LIGAMENT $ 1,381 ARTHROSCOPICALLY AIDED TRMNT, TIBIAL FX $ 2,235 ARTHROSCOPY, KNEE W/WO SYNOVIAL BX $ 1,175 ARTHROSCOPY, KNEE, SURGICAL; FOR INFECTION, LAVAGE $ 1,435 ARTHROSCOPY, KNEE W/LATERAL RELEASE $ 1,463 ARTHROSCOPY, KNEE, SURGICAL; SYNOVECTOMY, LIMITED $ 1,339 KNEE ARTHROSCOPY, SYNOVECTOMY 2+ COMPART $ 1,888 KNEE ARTHROSCOPY DEBRIDEMENT/SHAVING $ 1,784 ARTHROSCOPY, KNEE MENISCECTOMY $ 1,613 KNEE ARTHROSCOPY, W/MENISCECTOMY $ 1,554 ARTHROSCOPY, KNEE W/MENISCUS RPR $ 2,013 RECONSTRUCTION ANT CRUC LIGAMENT $ 2,822 UNLISTED PROCEDURE, ARTHROSCOPY $ 1,545 REMOVAL OF IMPLANT; SUPERFICIAL $ 1,068 REMOVAL, IMPLANT, DEEP $ 1,211 CPTR ASST SURG NAV $ 424 TENODESIS, LONG TENDON BICEPS $ 2,125 ARTHROPLASTY, TOTAL HIP, BILATERAL $ 7,768 TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY, BILATERAL $ 7,828 REVISION OF TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY, BILATERAL $ 10,051 CARPAL TUNNEL RELEASE, BILATERAL $ 2,424 NEUROPLASTY, MAJOR PERIPHERAL NERVE, ARM OR LEG, $ 1,354 NEUROPLASTY, ULNAR NERVE, ELBOW $ 1,700 CARPAL TUNNEL RELEASE; MEDIAN NERVE $ 1,211 EXCISION OF NEUROMA; HAND OR FOOT, EXCEPT DIGITAL $ 1,239 ARTHROCENTESIS/ASPIRATION/INJ, MAJOR JT, INPATIENT PROCEDURE $ 184 ARTHROSCOPY, SHOULDER, SURGICAL; DEBRIDEMENT, LIMITED $ 1,535 CAPSULECTOMY OR CAPSULOTOMY; METACARPOPHALANGEAL JOINT, EACH JOINT $ 1,713 TENOLYSIS, EXTENSOR TENDON, HAND OR FINGER, EACH TENDON $ 1,520 REPAIR, NONUNION OR MALUNION, FEMUR, $ 3,417 OPEN TREATMENT OF FRACTURE OF DISTAL TIBIA $ 2,276 OPEN TREATMENT OF KNEE DISLOCATION $ 2,823 ARTHROSCOPY, WRIST, SURGICAL $ 1,405 OSTEOPLASTY, RADIUS OR ULNA $ 2,076 ARTHRODESIS, WRIST; $ 2,343 REPAIR OF COLLATERAL LIGAMENT, METACARPOPHALANGEAL $ 1,741 EXCISION OF TENDON, FOREARM AND/OR WRIST $ 1,451 EXCISION, TUMOR, SOFT TISSUE OF FOREARM AND/OR WRIST $ 826 CARPECTOMY; 1 BONE $ 1,285 CLAVICULECTOMY; PARTIAL $ 1,533 REPAIR OF NONUNION OR MALUNION, RADIUS OR ULNA $ 2,715 FASCIECTOMY, PALM ONLY, WITH OR WITHOUT Z-PLASTY $ 1,613 ENDOSCOPY, WRIST, BILATERAL, W/RELEASE TRANSVERSE CARPAL LIGAMENT $ 2,762 REMOVAL NON-BIODEGRADABLE DRUG IMPLANT $ 369 AVULSION NAIL PLATE PERM $ 484 OPEN TREATMENT OF FEMORAL FRACTURE, PROXIMAL END $ 3,126 EXCISION, OLECRANON BURSA $ 929 TREATMENT OF SUPERFICIAL WOUND DEHISCENCE; SIMPLE $ 508 OSTEOTOMY, RADIUS; DISTAL THIRD $ 1,769 ARTHROSCOPY, KNEE, SURGICAL; FOR REMOVAL OF LOOSE BODY OR FB $ 1,408 EXCISION, TUMOR, SOFT TISSUE OF FOOT OR TOE $ 903 LAMINECTOMY, FACETECTOMY AND FORAMINOTOMY; LUMBAR, SINGLE VERTEBRAL SEGMENT $ 2,875 ARTHRODESIS, POSTERIOR OR POSTEROLATERAL TECHNIQUE, LUMBAR, SINGLE LEVEL $ 4,145 ARTHRODESIS, POSTERIOR OR POSTEROLATERAL TECHNIQUE, EA ADD'L SEGMENT $ 1,020 AUTOGRAFT FOR SPINE SURGERY ONLY $ 400 POSTERIOR SEGMENTAL INSTRUMENTATION $ 1,988 ALLOGRAFT, MORSELIZED, OR PLACEMENT OF OSTEOPROMOTIVE MATERIAL $ 275 POSTERIOR NON-SEGMENTAL INSTRUMENTATION $ 1,980 REMOVAL OF POSTERIOR SEGMENTAL INSTRUMENTATION $ 1,830 SECONDARY CLOSURE OF SURGICAL WOUND, EXTENSIVE $ 2,083 ARTHROSCOPY, SHOULDER, SURGICAL; SYNOVECTOMY, PARTIAL $ 1,405 ARTHROTOMY, ELBOW; WITH JOINT EXPLORATION $ 1,314 SUTURE OF QUADRICEPS OR HAMSTRING MUSCLE RUPTURE $ 1,546 RADICAL RESECTION OF TUMOR, DISTAL PHALANX OF FINGER $ 1,652 FULL THICKNESS GRAFT, FREE, INCLUDING DIRECT CLOSURE, <20 SQ CM $ 2,073 ARTHROSCOPY, KNEE, SURGICAL; WITH MENISCUS REPAIR $ 2,201 ARTHROTOMY, WITH SYNOVECTOMY, KNEE; ANTERIOR $ 2,004 PARTIAL EXCISION, BONE, TARSAL/METATARSAL $ 819 INCISION, BONE CORTEX (EG, OSTEOMYELITIS OR BON $ 1,512 ARTHROSCOPY, KNEE, SURGICAL; DRILLING FOR OSTEOCHONDRITIS $ 1,975 ARTHRODESIS, ANTERIOR INTERBODY, CERV; EA ADD'L LEVEL $ 1,035 OPEN TREATMENT OF DISTAL RADIAL INTRA-ARTICULAR FX $ 2,746 ALLOGRAFT, STRUCTURAL, FOR SPINE SURGERY ONLY $ 288 ARTHRODESIS, ANTERIOR INTERBODY, CERVICAL $ 4,439 INSERTION OF INTERBODY BIOMECHANICAL DEVICE(S) $ 674 ANTERIOR INSTRUMENTATION; 2 TO 3 VERTEBRAL SEGMENT $ 1,896 ARTHRODESIS, COMBINED POSTERIOR OR POSTEROLATERAL; SINGLE; LUMBAR $ 4,828 OSTEOTOMY OF SPINE, POSTERIOR OR POSTEROLATERAL AP; 1 SEGMENT, LUMBAR $ 3,919 ARTHRODESIS, COMBINED POSTERIOR OR POSTEROLATERAL; EA ADD'L SPACE $ 1,292 OSTEOTOMY OF SPINE, POSTERIOR OR POSTEROLATERAL AP; EA ADD'L SEGMENT $ 948 LAMINECTOMY, FACETECTOMY AND FORAMINOTOMY; EA ADD'L SEGMENT; C,T,L $ 549.
Recommended publications
  • Unicompartmental Knee Replacement

    Unicompartmental Knee Replacement

    This is a repository copy of Unicompartmental Knee Replacement. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/120113/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Takahashi, T, Pandit, HG orcid.org/0000-0001-7392-8561 and Phil, D (2017) Unicompartmental Knee Replacement. Journal of Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery, 4 (2). pp. 55-60. ISSN 0021-8790 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jajs.2017.08.009 © 2017 International Society for Knowledge for Surgeons on Arthroscopy and Arthroplasty. Published by Elsevier, a division of RELX India, Pvt. Ltd. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND) licence. This licence only allows you to download this work and share it with others as long as you credit the authors, but you can’t change the article in any way or use it commercially. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Accepted Manuscript Title: Unicompartmental Knee Replacement Author: Tsuneari Takahashi PII: S2214-9635(17)30041-X DOI: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.jajs.2017.08.009 Reference: JAJS 97 To appear in: Authors: Hemant G.
  • Arthroscopy - Orthoinfo - AAOS 6/10/12 3:40 PM

    Arthroscopy - Orthoinfo - AAOS 6/10/12 3:40 PM

    Arthroscopy - OrthoInfo - AAOS 6/10/12 3:40 PM Copyright 2010 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Arthroscopy Arthroscopy is a surgical procedure orthopaedic surgeons use to visualize, diagnose, and treat problems inside a joint. The word arthroscopy comes from two Greek words, "arthro" (joint) and "skopein" (to look). The term literally means "to look within the joint." In an arthroscopic examination, an orthopaedic surgeon makes a small incision in the patient's skin and then inserts pencil-sized instruments that contain a small lens and lighting system to magnify and illuminate the structures inside the joint. Light is transmitted through fiber optics to the end of the arthroscope that is inserted into the joint. By attaching the arthroscope to a miniature television camera, the surgeon is able to see the interior of the joint through this very small incision rather than a large incision needed for surgery. The television camera attached to the arthroscope displays the image of the joint on a television screen, allowing the surgeon to look, for example, throughout the knee. This lets the surgeon see the cartilage, ligaments, and under the kneecap. The surgeon can determine the amount or type of injury and then repair Here are parts of the shoulder joint as or correct the problem, if it is necessary. seen trhough an arthroscope: the rotator cuff (RC), the head fo the humerus Why is arthroscopy necessary? (HH), and the biceps tendon (B). Diagnosing joint injuries and disease begins with a thorough medical history, physical examination, and usually X-rays. Additional tests such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) also scan may be needed.
  • Download Program

    Download Program

    38th Annual San Diego Course June 4 – 5, 2021 Interactive Virtual Shoulder Course Arthroscopy Arthroplasty Fractures Program Chairmen: James C. Esch, M.D., SDSI President and C.E.O. Patrick J. Denard, M.D., Program Chair Final Program Tornier. A trusted name. A relentless focus. Innovation Now driven by Stryker. We’re doubling down on shoulder arthroplasty and to a T. renewing our promise to you and the patients you serve. Stryker. The leader, committed to making healthcare better. Tornier. The shoulder solutions, driving industry-leading innovation. You. The surgeon, delivering better outcomes for your patients. Coming together is what sets us apart. The innovation continues Summer 2021. TM and ® denote Trademarks and Registered Trademarks of Stryker Corporation or its affiliates. ©2021 Stryker Corporation or its affiliates. AP-015176A 06-MAY-2021 Instability excellence Redefining peak performance Elevate your expertise for shoulder instability repairs. With solutions ranging from simple to complex, Smith+Nephew’s Instability Excellence portfolio is setting new standards to take you to the next level while returning your patients to peak performance. Learn more at smith-nephew.com. Smith & Nephew, Inc., 150 Minuteman Road, Andover, MA 01810, www.smith-nephew.com, T +978 749 1000, US Customer Service: +1 800 343 5717 ◊Trademark of Smith+Nephew. All trademarks acknowledged. ©2021 Smith+Nephew. All rights reserved. Printed in USA. 30280 V1 04/21 Advanced healing solutions Redefining healing potential for rotator cuff repair REGENESORB◊ Material Replaced by bone within 24 months.*1,2 at 6 months at at 18 months at Comparisons of absorption, measured via μCT, at 6 and 18 months.3 Suture Anchor Learn more at smith-nephew.com.
  • The Benefit of Arthroscopy for Symptomatic Total Knee Arthroplasty

    The Benefit of Arthroscopy for Symptomatic Total Knee Arthroplasty

    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Arthroscopy for symptomatic total knee arthroplasty THE BENEFIT OF ARTHROSCOPY FOR SYMPTOMATIC TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY Hsiu-Peng Teng, Yi-Jiun Chou, Li-Chun Lin, and Chi-Yin Wong Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Thirty-one knees with symptomatic total knee arthroplasty were diagnosed and treated arthroscopically. There were 18 knees with soft tissue impingement and 13 knees without. There were 16 knees with painful arthroplasty and range of motion (ROM) greater than 90°. Hypertrophied synovitis with or without impingement was more easily found by arthroscopy in this group than in the other 15 knees with the chief complaint of limited ROM, where more remarkable fibrotic tissue with intra-articular adhesion was found. Overall, the average improvement in ROM was 43.1° immediately after arthroscopy, and 20° at the final follow-up. Symptoms improved in 90.3% of patients, and 58.1% were satisfied with the outcome of their surgery. Arthroscopy is helpful for intra-articular diagnosis, obtaining a specimen for histopatho- logic analysis, culture for subclinical infection, and better improvement in ROM. In our experience, arthros- copy for symptomatic knee arthroplasty is reliable, safe and effective. Key Words: arthroscopy, total knee arthroplasty (Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2004;20:473–7) Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a popular and successful detailed history review, physical examination, and radio- treatment for knee-joint problems. However, a subset of graphic studies (anteroposterior, lateral and Merchant patients will suffer from persistent pain, with or without in- views) to detect possible pathologic conditions (e.g.
  • Procedure Name: Knee Arthroscopy Brief Description of Procedure

    Procedure Name: Knee Arthroscopy Brief Description of Procedure

    Procedure Name: Knee Arthroscopy Brief Description of Procedure: Arthroscopic surgery is a common orthopedic procedure that is used to diagnose and treat problems in joints. Greek words: ‘arthro,’ meaning “joint” and ‘scope,’ meaning, “look.” When arthroscopy is per- formed, a telescope with a camera is inserted into the joint through a small incision. The camera is attached to a light source and shows a picture of the inside of the joint on a monitor. One or more incisions may be made to treat the underlying problem. This procedure can be used to diagnose a joint problem, perform surgery that repairs a joint problem, remove a loose or foreign body, or monitor a dis- ease or the effectiveness of a treatment. Arthroscopy is commonly performed on the knee, shoulder, and ankle. It also can be done on the hip, elbow, and wrist. Describe anesthesia type that typically is given: General Anesthesia is usually used for this surgery. See Anesthesia Section. What patients that smoke can expect when having surgery: After surgery your anesthesia specialist will check your breathing and lung sounds to determine if a breathing treatment is needed. Smoking increases airway irritation, which leads to wheezing and coughing. Further breathing treatments and medications are sometimes needed. Average length of surgery time: 45 minutes-1 hour Average length in immediate recovery: 30 minutes Average length for time of discharge: Expect to be here an average of one hour after surgery. During this time you may experience some discomfort. Medication can be given to make pain bearable. When can you go back to work: Depending on your occupation you and your doctor will discuss when you may return to work.
  • Musculoskeletal Program CPT Codes and Descriptions

    Musculoskeletal Program CPT Codes and Descriptions

    Musculoskeletal Program CPT Codes and Descriptions Spine Surgery Procedure Codes CPT CODES DESCRIPTION Allograft, morselized, or placement of osteopromotive material, for spine surgery only (List separately in addition 20930 to code for primary procedure) 20931 Allograft, structural, for spine surgery only (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) Autograft for spine surgery only (includes harvesting the graft); local (eg, ribs, spinous process, or laminar 20936 fragments) obtained from same incision (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) Autograft for spine surgery only (includes harvesting the graft); morselized (through separate skin or fascial 20937 incision) (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) Autograft for spine surgery only (includes harvesting the graft); structural, bicortical or tricortical (through separate 20938 skin or fascial incision) (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) 20974 Electrical stimulation to aid bone healing; noninvasive (nonoperative) Osteotomy of spine, posterior or posterolateral approach, 3 columns, 1 vertebral segment (eg, pedicle/vertebral 22206 body subtraction); thoracic Osteotomy of spine, posterior or posterolateral approach, 3 columns, 1 vertebral segment (eg, pedicle/vertebral 22207 body subtraction); lumbar Osteotomy of spine, posterior or posterolateral approach, 3 columns, 1 vertebral segment (eg, pedicle/vertebral 22208 body subtraction); each additional vertebral segment (List separately in addition to code for
  • Clinical Guidelines

    Clinical Guidelines

    CLINICAL GUIDELINES Interventional Pain Management Services Version 1.0.2019 Clinical guidelines for medical necessity review of comprehensive musculoskeletal management services. © 2019 eviCore healthcare. All rights reserved. Regence: Comprehensive Musculoskeletal Management Guidelines V1.0.2019 Interventional Pain Management CMM-200: Epidural Steroid Injections (ESI) 3 CMM-201: Facet Joint Injections/Medial Branch Blocks 17 CMM-202: Trigger Point Injections 21 CMM-203: Sacroiliac Joint Injections 32 CMM-204: Prolotherapy 37 CMM-207: Epidural Adhesiolysis 40 CMM-208: Radiofrequency Joint Ablations/Denervations 44 CMM-209: Regional Sympathetic Blocks 51 CMM 210: Implantable Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems 57 CMM-211: Spinal Cord Stimulators 65 CMM-308: Thermal Intradiscal Procedures 66 CMM-310: Manipulation of the Spine Under Anesthesia 71 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ © 2019 eviCore healthcare. All Rights Reserved. Page 2 of 73 400 Buckwalter Place Boulevard, Bluffton, SC 29910 (800) 918-8924 www.eviCore.com Regence: Comprehensive Musculoskeletal Management Guidelines V1.0.2019 CMM-200: Epidural Steroid Injections (ESI) CMM-200.1: Definitions 4 CMM-200.2: General Guidelines 5 CMM-200.3: Indications: Selective Nerve Root Block (SNRB) 6 CMM-200.4: Indications: Epidural Steroid Injections 7 CMM-200.5: Non-Indications: SNRB 8 CMM-200.6: Non-Indications: ESI 8 ® CMM-200.7: Procedure (CPT ) Codes 9 CMM-200.8: References 10 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
  • TESSYS Technique with Small Grade of Facetectomy Has Potential Biomechanical Advantages Compared to the In-Out TED with Intact Articular Process : an In-Silico Study

    TESSYS Technique with Small Grade of Facetectomy Has Potential Biomechanical Advantages Compared to the In-Out TED with Intact Articular Process : an In-Silico Study

    TESSYS Technique With Small Grade of Facetectomy Has Potential Biomechanical Advantages Compared to the In-Out TED With Intact Articular Process : An In-Silico Study Jingchi Li West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine for Sichuan University Chen Xu Changzheng Hospital Aliated to the Naval Medical University Xiaoyu Zhang Aliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine for Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine Zhipeng Xi Aliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine for Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine Mengnan Liu Macau University of Science and Technology Zhongxin Fang Xihua University Nan Wang Aliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine for Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine Lin Xie ( [email protected] ) Aliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine for Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine Yueming Song West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine for Sichuan University Research Article Keywords: Biomechanical deterioration, Transforaminal endoscopic discectomy, Endoscopic dynamic drill, Facetectomy, Iatrogenic annulus injury Posted Date: April 26th, 2021 Page 1/27 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-429749/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Version of Record: A version of this preprint was published at BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders on July 10th, 2021. See the published version at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04504-1. Page 2/27 Abstract Background: The facetectomy was reported as an important procedure in both in-out and out-in (i.e. transforaminal endoscopic spine system (TESSYS)) techniques in the transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (TED), and which was also related to the deterioration of postoperative biomechanical environment and related poor prognosis.
  • Priority Health Spine and Joint Code List

    Priority Health Spine and Joint Code List

    Priority Health Joint Services Code List Category CPT® Code CPT® Code Description Joint Services 23000 Removal of subdeltoid calcareous deposits, open Joint Services 23020 Capsular contracture release (eg, Sever type procedure) Joint Services 23120 Claviculectomy; partial Joint Services 23130 Acromioplasty or acromionectomy, partial, with or without coracoacromial ligament release Joint Services 23410 Repair of ruptured musculotendinous cuff (eg, rotator cuff) open; acute Joint Services 23412 Repair of ruptured musculotendinous cuff (eg, rotator cuff) open;chronic Joint Services 23415 Coracoacromial ligament release, with or without acromioplasty Joint Services 23420 Reconstruction of complete shoulder (rotator) cuff avulsion, chronic (includes acromioplasty) Joint Services 23430 Tenodesis of long tendon of biceps Joint Services 23440 Resection or transplantation of long tendon of biceps Joint Services 23450 Capsulorrhaphy, anterior; Putti-Platt procedure or Magnuson type operation Joint Services 23455 Capsulorrhaphy, anterior;with labral repair (eg, Bankart procedure) Joint Services 23460 Capsulorrhaphy, anterior, any type; with bone block Joint Services 23462 Capsulorrhaphy, anterior, any type;with coracoid process transfer Joint Services 23465 Capsulorrhaphy, glenohumeral joint, posterior, with or without bone block Joint Services 23466 Capsulorrhaphy, glenohumeral joint, any type multi-directional instability Joint Services 23470 ARTHROPLASTY, GLENOHUMERAL JOINT; HEMIARTHROPLASTY ARTHROPLASTY, GLENOHUMERAL JOINT; TOTAL SHOULDER [GLENOID
  • Musculoskeletal Surgical Procedures Requiring Prior Authorization (Effective 11.1.2020)

    Musculoskeletal Surgical Procedures Requiring Prior Authorization (Effective 11.1.2020)

    Musculoskeletal Surgical Procedures Requiring Prior Authorization (Effective 11.1.2020) Procedure Code Description ACL Repair 27407 Repair, primary, torn ligament and/or capsule, knee; cruciate ACL Repair 27409 Repair, primary, torn ligament and/or capsule, knee; collateral and cruciate ligaments ACL Repair 29888 Arthroscopically aided anterior cruciate ligament repair/augmentation or reconstruction Acromioplasty and Rotator Cuff Repair 23130 Acromioplasty Or Acromionectomy, Partial, With Or Without Coracoacromial Ligament Release Acromioplasty and Rotator Cuff Repair 23410 Repair of ruptured musculotendinous cuff (eg, rotator cuff) open; acute Acromioplasty and Rotator Cuff Repair 23412 Repair of ruptured musculotendinous cuff (eg, rotator cuff) open; chronic Acromioplasty and Rotator Cuff Repair 23415 Coracoacromial Ligament Release, With Or Without Acromioplasty Acromioplasty and Rotator Cuff Repair 23420 Reconstruction of complete shoulder (rotator) cuff avulsion, chronic (includes acromioplasty) Arthroscopy, Shoulder, Surgical; Decompression Of Subacromial Space With Partial Acromioplasty, With Coracoacromial Ligament (Ie, Arch) Release, When Performed (List Separately In Addition Acromioplasty and Rotator Cuff Repair 29826 To Code For Primary Procedure) Acromioplasty and Rotator Cuff Repair 29827 Arthroscopy, shoulder, surgical; with rotator cuff repair Allograft for Spinal Fusion [BMP] 20930 Allograft, morselized, or placement of osteopromotive material, for spine surgery only Ankle Fusion 27870 Arthrodesis, ankle, open Ankle Fusion
  • Combining Orthopedic Special Tests to Improve Diagnosis of Shoulder Pathology

    Combining Orthopedic Special Tests to Improve Diagnosis of Shoulder Pathology

    Physical Therapy in Sport 16 (2015) 87e92 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Physical Therapy in Sport journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/ptsp Masterclass Combining orthopedic special tests to improve diagnosis of shoulder pathology * Eric J. Hegedus a, , Chad Cook b, Jeremy Lewis c, Alexis Wright a, Jin-Young Park d a High Point University, Department of Physical Therapy, High Point, NC 27262, USA b Physical Therapy Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA c Physiotherapy, University of Hertfordshire, Department of Allied Health Professions and Midwifery, School of Health and Social Work, United Kingdom d Shoulder, Elbow & Sports Center, Konkuk University, Seoul, South Korea article info abstract Article history: The use of orthopedic special tests (OSTs) to diagnose shoulder pathology via the clinical examination is Received 2 April 2014 standard in clinical practice. There is a great deal of research on special tests but much of the research is Received in revised form of a lower quality implying that the metrics from that research, sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood 5 July 2014 ratios, is likely to vary greatly in the hands of different clinicians and in varying practice environments. A Accepted 1 August 2014 way to improve the clinical diagnostic process is to cluster OSTs and to use these clusters to either rule in or out different pathologies. The aim of the article is to review the best OST clusters, examine the Keywords: methodology by which they were derived, and illustrate, with a case study, the use of these OST clusters Likelihood ratios Shoulder to arrive at a pathology-based diagnosis. © Diagnosis 2014 Elsevier Ltd.
  • Diagnosis and Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation with Radiculopathy

    Diagnosis and Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation with Radiculopathy

    Y Lumbar Disc Herniation with Radiculopathy | NASS Clinical Guidelines 1 G Evidence-Based Clinical Guidelines for Multidisciplinary ETHODOLO Spine Care M NE I DEL I U /G ON Diagnosis and Treatment of I NTRODUCT Lumbar Disc I Herniation with Radiculopathy NASS Evidence-Based Clinical Guidelines Committee D. Scott Kreiner, MD Paul Dougherty, II, DC Committee Chair, Natural History Chair Robert Fernand, MD Gary Ghiselli, MD Steven Hwang, MD Amgad S. Hanna, MD Diagnosis/Imaging Chair Tim Lamer, MD Anthony J. Lisi, DC John Easa, MD Daniel J. Mazanec, MD Medical/Interventional Treatment Chair Richard J. Meagher, MD Robert C. Nucci, MD Daniel K .Resnick, MD Rakesh D. Patel, MD Surgical Treatment Chair Jonathan N. Sembrano, MD Anil K. Sharma, MD Jamie Baisden, MD Jeffrey T. Summers, MD Shay Bess, MD Christopher K. Taleghani, MD Charles H. Cho, MD, MBA William L. Tontz, Jr., MD Michael J. DePalma, MD John F. Toton, MD This clinical guideline should not be construed as including all proper methods of care or excluding or other acceptable methods of care reason- ably directed to obtaining the same results. The ultimate judgment regarding any specific procedure or treatment is to be made by the physi- cian and patient in light of all circumstances presented by the patient and the needs and resources particular to the locality or institution. I NTRODUCT 2 Lumbar Disc Herniation with Radiculopathy | NASS Clinical Guidelines I ON Financial Statement This clinical guideline was developed and funded in its entirety by the North American Spine Society (NASS). All participating /G authors have disclosed potential conflicts of interest consistent with NASS’ disclosure policy.