Presidential Doctrines

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Presidential Doctrines Monroe Doctrine (1823) The United States' opinion that European powers should no longer colonize the Americas or interfere with the affairs of sovereign nations located in the Americas, such as the United States, Mexico, Gran Colombia and others. In return, the United States planned to stay neutral in wars between European powers and in wars between a European power and its colonies. However, if these latter type of wars were to occur in the Americas, the U.S. would view such action as hostile toward itself. Roosevelt Corollary (1900) A frank statement that the U.S. was willing to seek leverage over Latin American governments by acting as an international police power in the region. This announcement has been described as the policy of "speaking softly but carrying a big stick", and consequently launched a period of "big stick" diplomacy, in contrast with later Dollar Diplomacy. Truman Doctrine (1947) The United States was prepared to send any money, equipment, or military force to countries that were threatened by the communist government, thereby offering assistance to those countries resisting communism. In U.S. President Harry S Truman's words, it became "the policy of the United States to support free peoples who are resisting attempted subjugation by armed minorities or by outside pressures. Eisenhower Doctrine (1957) A country (middle-east) could request American economic assistance and/or aid from U.S. military forces if it was being threatened by armed aggression from another state. Nixon Doctrine (1969) United States henceforth expected its allies to assume primary responsibility for their own military defense. This was the start of the "Vietnamization" of the Vietnam War. The Doctrine argued for the pursuit of peace through a partnership with American allies. Carter Doctrine (1976-80) Humanitarian Reagan Doctrine (1980-88) The Reagan doctrine called for American support of the Contras in Nicaragua, the mujahedeen in Afghanistan and Jonas Savimbi's UNITA movement in Angola, among other anti-communist groups. Bush “W” Doctrine (2000-08) Permits preventive war against potential aggressors before they are capable of mounting attacks against the United States, a view that has been used in part as a rationale for the 2003 Iraq War. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Chapter 26: the Origins of the Cold War Chapter Review
Chapter 26: The Origins of the Cold War Chapter Review Terms United Nations: 1. An international peacekeeping organization 2. Founded in 1945 a. Represented 50 nations 3. Purpose a. Promote world peace b. Promote security c. Promote economic development Satellite Nations: 1. A country dominated politically and economically by another. a. Much of Eastern Europe became part of the Soviet Union as satellite nations Containment: 1. A measure used to block another nation’s attempts to spread its influence to other nations Iron Curtain: 1. Term used to describe the imaginary line separating Communist Eastern block countries with Western Europe. 2. Terminology first used by Winston Churchill in 1946 Cold War: 1. A conflict between the United States and the Soviet Union a. Neither country directly confronted the other in a battle situation 2. Dominated world affairs from 1945‐1991 3. Dominated United States foreign policy between 1945‐1991 Truman Doctrine: 1. United States policy during the Truman Administration a. Presented by Truman in 1949 2. Doctrine provided economic and military aid to free countries under the threat of takeover a. Threat by internal or external forces 3. Stopped communism in Greece Marshall Plan: 1. Plan was proposed by Secretary of State George Marshall in 1947 a. United States would provide economic aid to help European nations rebuild following World War II. Berlin Airlift: 1. An operation where the United States and Britain flew supplies into West Berlin in 1948. a. Began when the Soviet Union blockaded the city 2. Operation lasted 327 days a. They made 277,000 flights b.
[Show full text]
Issues in US Foreign Policy: Things to Know
APUSH Review – Thematic Traces: Foreign Affairs Treaties Actions Treaty of Paris Stamp Act Congress Treaty of Ghent XYZ Affair Jay’s Treaty Louisiana Purchase Pinkney’s Treaty Embargo, Non-Intercourse, Macon’s Bill # 2 Treaty of Guadalupe—Hidalgo Washington Naval Conference “Seward’s Folly” Dawes Plan Clayton—Bulwer Treaty London Economic Conference Hay—Pauncefote Treaty Yalta Conference Hay—Bunau-Varilla Treaty Marshall Plan Treaty of Versailles Berlin Airlift ABM Treaty Nixon goes to China SALT I/II Treaties Gulf of Tonkin Resolution Camp-David Accords War Powers Act Policies Issues No Entangling Alliances Oostend Manifesto Monroe Doctrine Trent Affair Open Door Policy Lynching of Italians in New Orleans 1891 Teller Amendment Chile vs. US 1892 Platt Amendment Venezuela Crisis 1895-96 Roosevelt Corollary Russo-Japanese War 1904 Dollar Diplomacy Mexican Revolution – Huerta & Caranza Missionary Diplomacy US troops in Vera Cruz 14 Points CIA in Guatemala Isolationism/Neutrality Legislation Suez Crisis Good Neighbor Diplomacy U2 Incident Cash and Carry Hungarian Uprising Destroyers for Bases Prague Spring Lend-Lease Dienbienphu Atlantic Charter Pueblo Incident Unconditional Surrender Bay of Pigs Truman Doctrine Cuban Missile Crisis Containment OPEC Oil Crisis Massive Retaliation Iranian Hostage Crisis Rollback Bombing of US Barracks in Lebanon Police Action Iran-Contra Affair McCarthyism Annexation of the Philippines Détente Panama Canal Vietnamization Human-Rights * These items do not generally cover actions related to US wars, which by their nature are entirely foreign affairs and can be included without listing them below. .
[Show full text]
Venezuelan Affair and Roosevelt Corollary
Venezuelan Affair and Roosevelt Corollary By Marcqus Gerome Ramos, Ashton Rowe, Joseph Weichsel, and Noel Rogers ● Venezuela is broke from civil war Context/ ● Refuses to pay debts/damages to Europe Background ● Germany + Britain and Italy impose naval blockade ● Germany okay as long as it’s peaceful and doesn’t take territory ● When Germany created blockade it gave US reason to intervene Why the ● Roosevelt sent his big stick, US navy, to stop blockade ● Monroe doctrine rejects Euro. influence in West Hemisphere U.S. got involved In 1902 war is near with Germany How the ● Theodore Roosevelt decides to switch control of Culebra to the US U.S. got Navy and go en route towards the caribbean involved ● Venezuela was involved with major debt so President Roosevelt tries to pardon and help by pushing back the forces of the combined Anglo-French-German ● New imperialist doctrine Roosevelt ● State of the Union Address ● Against European imperialism Corollary ● Venezuelan Crisis ● Venezuelan Crisis led to the making of the Roosevelt Corollary Outcome ● Forced the warships of Germany and Britain to withdraw ● Better relationship w/ Venezuela ● Which countries were involved? Review ● What were the effects of the Time!!! Venezuelan Crisis of 1902? ● What did the Roosevelt do for Venezuela? GOOD JOB YOU PASSED THE REVIEW!!! WOW YOU DIDN'T GET ANYTHING RIGHT. I AM ASHAMED. YOU CALL YOURSELF FELLOW IB STUDENTS??????? ● Kshyk, Christopher J. “Roosevelt's Imperialism: The Venezuelan Crisis, the Panama Canal, and Works Cited the Origins of the Roosevelt Corollary.” Inquiries Journal/Student Pulse 7 (2015)., www.inquiriesjournal.com/a?id=1002 ● Pike, John.
[Show full text]
The Historical Cuba-Us Discordancy from the Theoretical Outlook of The
European Scientific Journal December 2014 edition vol.10, No.34 ISSN: 1857 – 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431 THE HISTORICAL CUBA-U.S. DISCORDANCY FROM THE THEORETICAL OUTLOOK OF THE INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Dr. Onesimo Julian Moreira Seijos University of Quintana Roo Abstract This paper focuses on the main features of the relationship between Cuba and the United States (U.S.) since the nineteenth century to the present. The essay analyses the confrontation between these two countries from the theoretical view of International Relations (IR). The aim of the paper is to demonstrate that the nature of the Cuba-U.S. discrepancies during the Cold War is not confined to the ideological controversy of the East/West relations. Despite the changes that have taken place in world politics during the 1990s and the hopes which opened with the Obama administration, the design of U.S. policy towards Cuba has scarcely changed after the end of the Cold War. On the other hand, the revival of the Wilsonian ideas alleged in the mainstream IR literature does not take into account the special case of the Cuba-U.S relations. Regardless of the current trend to stress international institutions and to sort out conflict within the framework of international agreements, the Cuban problem remains as a national interest matter for the U.S. The historic sequence of the Cuban issue in American politics lend support to the argument that while within the academic discipline of International Relations there is a trend to consider the current period as a proof of the end of realism, the wires which lead the American political behaviour towards Cuba are still under the influence of old-fashioned national interest, the rational choice program and the U.S.
[Show full text]
Presidential Foreign Policy Doctrines
20 July 2015 Presidential Doctrines, the Use of Force and International Order Did the US’ military and legal reactions to the 9/11 attacks fundamentally transform its foreign and security policies? Joseph Siracusa doesn’t think so. He argues that the so-called Bush and Obama Doctrines have had more in common with previous presidential approaches than most people realize. By Joseph Siracusa for ISN In the ever-changing landscape of international relations, the extent to which the actions of the United States contribute to justice and order remains a source of contentious debate. Indeed, it is difficult to find a point in recent history when the United States and its foreign policy have been subject to such polarised and acrimonious reflection, both domestically and internationally. Notwithstanding recent ‘decline’ debates and the rise of emerging powers, the United States continues to hold a formidable advantage over its chief rivals in terms of formal power assets more than twenty-five years after the end of the Cold War. Few anticipated this situation; on the contrary, many assumed that, after a brief moment of unipolarity following the collapse of the Soviet Union, international affairs would soon regain a certain symmetry. Instead, US hegemony is still par for the course. In this context, because the foreign policy ‘doctrines’ of American presidents remain an important driver of the outlook of the United States, these doctrines continue to play a significant role in shaping international order. Though they have veered from isolationist to interventionist to expansionist over the years, these doctrines in fact exhibit a remarkable continuity – even in the post 9/11 era.
[Show full text]
Dwight Eisenhower, the Warrior, & John Kennedy, the Cold Warrior
Student Publications Student Scholarship Fall 2014 Dwight Eisenhower, The aW rrior, & John Kennedy, The oldC Warrior: Foreign Policy Under Two Presidents Andrew C. Nosti Gettysburg College Follow this and additional works at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship Part of the American Politics Commons, Defense and Security Studies Commons, European History Commons, Political History Commons, Public Policy Commons, Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, and the United States History Commons Share feedback about the accessibility of this item. Nosti, Andrew C., "Dwight Eisenhower, The aW rrior, & John Kennedy, The oC ld Warrior: Foreign Policy Under Two Presidents" (2014). Student Publications. 265. https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship/265 This is the author's version of the work. This publication appears in Gettysburg College's institutional repository by permission of the copyright owner for personal use, not for redistribution. Cupola permanent link: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship/ 265 This open access student research paper is brought to you by The uC pola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of The uC pola. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dwight Eisenhower, The aW rrior, & John Kennedy, The oldC Warrior: Foreign Policy Under Two Presidents Abstract This paper presents a comparison between President Eisenhower and President Kennedy's foreign affairs policies, specifically regarding the Cold War, by examining the presidents' interactions with four distinct Cold War regions. Keywords Eisenhower, Dwight D. Eisenhower, Kennedy, John F. Kennedy, Foreign Affairs, Policy, Foreign Policy, Cold War, President Disciplines American Politics | Anthropology | Defense and Security Studies | European History | History | Political History | Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration | Public Policy | Social and Cultural Anthropology | United States History Comments This paper was written for Prof.
[Show full text]
The Organization of American States and the Monroe Doctrine - Legal Implications Ann Van Wynen Thomas
Louisiana Law Review Volume 30 | Number 4 June 1970 The Organization of American States and the Monroe Doctrine - Legal Implications Ann Van Wynen Thomas A. J. Thomas Jr. Repository Citation Ann Van Wynen Thomas and A. J. Thomas Jr., The Organization of American States and the Monroe Doctrine - Legal Implications, 30 La. L. Rev. (1970) Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol30/iss4/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Louisiana Law Review by an authorized editor of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES AND THE MONROE DOCTRINE-LEGAL IMPLICATIONS Ann Van Wynen Thomas* A. J. Thomas, Jr.** BACKGROUND A discussion of the Monroe Doctrine today is approached with some trepidation by the wary, for the revered dogma ("I believe in the Monroe Doctrine, in our Constitution and in the laws of God") 1 often described as "the first and most fundamental" of the foreign policies of the United States and a protector of the Western Hemisphere from extracontinental aggression has,2 in recent years, been subjected to bitter attack. It has been called moribund, obsolete, verbiage,3 a name so hateful to Latin Ameri- the United States fears to mention it much less in- can ears that 4 voke it because of its abrasive effect on continental relations. Possibly the most devastating assault emanated from Mr. Khru- shchev of the Soviet Union when he proclaimed: "We consider that the Monroe Doctrine has outlived its time .
[Show full text]
Containment, Cold War, and Consumerism: the Truman
STUDY GUIDE —CONTAINMENT , COLD WAR , AND CONSUMERISM: THE TRUMAN -EISENHOWER ERA THE ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS : To what extent did the policies of the U.S. government successfully address the communist threat, both foreign and domestic? Was McCarthyism primarily a product of demagoguery or a real domestic communist threat? To what extent was the 1950s an age of conformity in regard to politics, society, and culture? IN A NUTSHELL : The Cold War began after World War II with a disagreement between the US and the USSR over self- determination in Eastern Europe. The American struggle against communism spread to Asia after Communist forces took over China and after N. Korea invaded S. Korea. The struggle against communism overseas led some Americans to believe there were communist in the US government threatening the security of the US. Although President Eisenhower continued President Truman’s policy of containment of communism, his presidency also saw an expansion of the arms race, the beginning of covert operations by the CIA, and the beginning of the space race. Heavy consumer spending and increased productivity gave Americans the highest standard of living the world had ever known. However, some groups did not share in the prosperity, and social critics attacked American materialism and conformity. TERMS ON THE BACK KEY TERMS EVENTS PEOPLE Serviceman’s Readjustment Act (GI Bill), 1944 Harry Truman FDR died, April, 1945 Dwight D. Eisenhower United Nations established, 1945 George Kennan (Mr. X) Churchill’s Iron Curtain speech, 1946
[Show full text]
The Monroe Doctrine: Debating America’S Defense of Independence Abroad
THE MONROE DOCTRINE: DEBATING AMERICA’S DEFENSE OF INDEPENDENCE ABROAD AUTHOR: Katherine Corrado / Woodgrove High School, Purcellville, Virginia GUIDING QUESTION: How has U.S. involvement in foreign affairs shaped a “more perfect union?” OVERVIEW CONNECTIONS TO C3 FRAMEWORK After analyzing secondary and primary sources, students › D2.His.1.6-8. Analyze connections among events and will determine how the Monroe Doctrine reflects projected developments in broader historical contexts. American identity abroad. By participating in a debate, › D2.His.8.9-12. Analyze how current interpretations of the students will examine a variety of perspectives and support past are limited by the extent to which available historical an argument. sources represent perspectives of people at the time. OBJECTIVES DOCUMENTS USED At the conclusion of this activity, students will be able to PRIMARY SOURCES › Describe the arguments for and against U.S. involvement in foreign conflicts; Caesar Augustus Rodney, Letter from Caesar Augustus Rodney to President James Monroe, 1824 (excerpt) › Analyze the debates surrounding the Monroe Doctrine; Stanislaus Murray Hamilton, Editor, The writings of James Monroe.... and HathiTrust Digital Library › Evaluate the short- and long-term effects of the Monroe https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/ Doctrine on American identity and its contribution toward pt?id=uiug.30112005125403&view=1up&seq=456 building a more perfect union. Francisco José de Paula Santander y Omaña, Mensaje del Vicepresidente de Columbia Encargado del Gobierno,
[Show full text]
Theodore Roosevelt:The Great Diplomat NICHOLAS A. DRESCHER
Theodore Roosevelt:The Great Diplomat NICHOLAS A. DRESCHER This paper was presented at the 2006 Regional Phi Alpha Theta conference. It won 3rd place in the region. Diplomacy, of any nature, is at the heart of the success or failure of any nation. American diplomacy, throughout the years, is national representatives striving to reach a goal for the common good of the country. “Diplomacy” is defined as “the art or practice of conducting international relations, as in negoti- ating alliances, treaties, and agreements; tact and skill in dealing with people.” Another definition, not often recognized, is “wisdom in the management in pub- lic affairs.” This definition is not always true of those representatives of the United States that act on the United State’s behalf of diplomacy. A nation uses diplomacy for five main purposes including: national self –interest, economy, access to resources, secure most favored nation status, and ideological reasons. President Theodore Roosevelt displayed every aspect of the definition of “diplo- macy” and while in office touched on all five reasons that a nation would use diplomacy. President Roosevelt represents one of the greatest diplomats of the twentieth century. Robert Dallek summarizes President Roosevelt’s diplomacy well stating, “By policing the hemisphere, building the Panama Canal, restoring peace in Asia, and promoting it in Europe, Roosevelt helped renew the sense of mastery and self-confidence the social and economic upheavals of the late nine- teenth century had largely dissolved in the United States.”1 Theodore Roosevelt was born on October 27, 1858. Born and raised into a time of terrible strife in America,Theodore Roosevelt learned from his early life experiences.
[Show full text]
Primary Document #1: the Open Door Notes (Policy) (1899-1900)
Primary Document #1: The Open Door Notes (Policy) (1899-1900) By the late 19th century, Japan and the European powers had carved much of China into separate spheres of influence, inside of which each held economic dominance. The U.S., coming late to imperialism, held no sphere of influence in China. In 1899 U.S. Secretary of State John Hay proposed an "Open Door" policy in China in which all nations would have equal trading and development rights throughout all of China. Such a policy would put all the imperialist powers on equal footing in China and would limit the advantages of having one’s own sphere of influence. As you read, think about how the Open Door policy might be seen as noble and fair, and think about how it also reflects American political and economic self-interest. Document A: The Open Door Notes (Policy) Earnestly desirous to remove any cause of irritation and to insure at the same time to the commerce of all nations in China... [the United States urges all nations claiming a sphere of influence in China to declare] that [all nations] shall enjoy perfect equality of treatment for their commerce and navigation within such spheres.... We adhere to the policy... of peace with the Chinese nation, of furtherance of lawful commerce, and of protection of lives and property of our citizens by all means.... The policy of the Government of the United States is to seek a solution which may bring about permanent safety and peace to China, preserve Chinese territorial and administrative entity, protect all rights guaranteed to friendly powers by treaty and international law, and safeguard for the world the principle of equal and impartial trade with all parts of the Chinese Empire.
[Show full text]
Human Rights and Non-Intervention in the Inter-American System
Michigan Law Review Volume 65 Issue 6 1967 Human Rights and Non-Intervention in the Inter-American System José A. Cabranes Columbia University Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr Part of the Human Rights Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation José A. Cabranes, Human Rights and Non-Intervention in the Inter-American System, 65 MICH. L. REV. 1147 (1967). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol65/iss6/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Law Review at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HUMAN RIGHTS AND NON-INTERVENTION IN THE INTER-AMERICAN SYSTEM* Jose A. Cabranes** HE promotion and protection of human rights is a recent and T significant innovation in the inter-American system. For more than a decade after its founding, the Organization of American States (OAS) exhibited no particular inclination to undertake a pro gram to provide international protection for fundamental freedoms within member states. The proclamation in 1948 of the highly vaunted American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man1 and the frequent invocation of "human rights," "universal moral ity," and "the rights of man" in resolutions and international instru ments produced by the regional organization of the American re publics amounted to little more than well-intentioned, but quite fanciful, rhetoric. The long silence of the inter-American system is remarkable when contrasted with the continuing efforts of the United Nations to elaborate an International Bill of Rights and the significant ac complishments of the Council of Europe in implementing on a re gional basis the principal values enunciated in the Universal Decla ration of Human Rights.
[Show full text]