sign in sign up
<<
Home , Robert Brandom

University of Groningen

Objectivity without Reality Veluwenkamp, Herman

DOI: 10.33612/diss.147440153

IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

Publication date: 2020

Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database

Citation for published version (APA): Veluwenkamp, H. (2020). Objectivity without Reality: Implications of Conceptual Role in Metaethics. University of Groningen. https://doi.org/10.33612/diss.147440153

Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment.

Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.

Download date: 29-09-2021 139

Bibliography

Ayer, A. J. (1936). Language, Truth and . London: V. Gollancz. Bas, C. Van Fraassen (1980). The Scientific Image. . Beebe, James R. (2014). “How Different Kinds of Disagreement Impact Folk Metaethical Judgments”. In: Advances in Experimental Moral Psychology. Ed. by Jennifer Cole Wright and Hagop Sarkissian. Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 167–187. Beebe, James R. and David Sackris (2016). “Moral Objectivism Across the Lifespan”. In: Philosophical Psychology 29.6, pp. 912–929. Berker, Selim (Forthcoming). “Quasi-Dependence”. In: Oxford Studies in Metaethics. Blackburn, S. (1993). Essays in Quasi-Realism. Oxford University Press. isbn: 9780190281984. Blackburn, Simon (1984). Spreading the Word: Groundings in the of Language. Clarendon Press. Boghossian, Paul A. (1990). “The Status of Content”. In: Philosophical Review 99.2, pp. 157–84. Boyd, Richard (1988). “How to Be a Moral Realist”. In: Essays on Moral Re- alism. Ed. by G. Sayre-McCord. Cornell University Press, pp. 181–228. Brandom, Robert (1994). Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Harvard University Press. —(2000).Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism.Harvard University Press. — (2007). “Inferentialism and some of its challenges”. In: Philosophy and Phe- nomenological Research 74.3, pp. 651–676. 140 Bibliography

Brink, David O. (1984). “Moral Realism and the Sceptical Arguments From Disagreement and Queerness”. In: Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62.2, pp. 111–125. Brink, David Owen (1989). Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics. Cam- bridge University Press. Bromberger, Sylvain (1966). “Why-Questions”. In: Mind and Cosmos: Essays in Contemporary Science and Philosophy. Ed. by Robert G. Colodny. Uni- versity of Pittsburgh Press. Chrisman, Matthew (2008). “, Inferentialism, and Saving the De- bate”. In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77.2, pp. 334–358. issn:00318205. — (2011). “Expressivism, Inferentialism and the Theory of Meaning”. In: New Waves in Metaethics. Ed. by Michael Brady. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 103–125. isbn:978-0-230-29489-9. —(2016).The Meaning of ’Ought’: Beyond Descriptivism and Expressivism in Metaethics. USA: Oxford University Press. Colyvan, Mark (1998). “Can the Eleatic Principle Be Justified?” In: Canadian Journal of Philosophy 28.3, pp. 313–335. —(2001).The indispensability of mathematics. Oxford University Press. Copp, David (2017). “Are There Substantive Moral Conceptual Truths?” In: Moral : New Essays. Ed. by Diego E. Machuca. New York: Rout- ledge. Chap. 5, pp. 91–114. Cotnoir, A. J. and Douglas Edwards (2015). “From Truth Pluralism to On- tological Pluralism and Back”. In: Journal of Philosophy 112.3, pp. 113– 140. Cowie, Christopher (2014). “A New Explanatory Challenge for Nonnaturalists”. In: Res Philosophica 91.4, pp. 661–679. Cuneo, Terence and Russ Shafer-Landau (2014). “The Moral Fixed Points: New Directions for Moral Nonnaturalism”. In: Philosophical Studies 171.3, pp. 399–443. Bibliography 141

Cuneo, Terence and Russ Shafer-Landau (Dec. 2014). “The moral fixed points: new directions for moral nonnaturalism”. In: Philosophical Studies 171.3, pp. 399–443. issn:1573-0883. Dowell, Janice J. L. (2016). “The Metaethical Insignificance of Moral Twin Earth”. In: Oxford Studies in Metaethics. Ed. by Russ Shafer-Landau. Ox- ford University Press. Dreier, Jamie (2004). “MetaEthics and the Problem of Creeping Minimalism”. In: Philosophical Perspectives 18.1, pp. 23–44. — (2018). “The Real and the Quasi-Real: Problems of Distinction”. In: Cana- dian Journal of Philosophy 48.3-4, pp. 532–547. Dunaway, Billy and Tristram McPherson (2016). “Reference Magnetism as a Solution to the Moral Twin Earth Problem”. In: Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 3. Dutilh Novaes, Catarina and Herman Veluwenkamp (Feb. 2017). “Reasoning Biases, Non-Monotonic and Belief Revision”. English. In: Theoria 83.1, pp. 29–52. issn:0040-5817. Edwards, Douglas (2018). The Metaphysics of Truth. Oxford University Press. Eklund, Matti (2006). “Neo-Fregean Ontology”. In: Philosophical Perspectives 20.1, pp. 95–121. — (2012). “Alternative Normative Concepts”. In: 53.2, pp. 139–157. —(2017).Choosing Normative Concepts. Oxford University Press. Enoch, David (2003). “An Argument for Robust Metanormative Realism”. PhD thesis. New York University. — (2006). “Agency, shmagency: Why normativity won’t come from what is constitutive of action”. In: The Philosophical Review,pp.169–198. — (2011a). “Shmagency revisited”. In: New Waves in Metaethics. Palgrave Macmillan,pp.208–233. —(2011b).Taking morality seriously: A defense of robust realism. Oxford University Press. 142 Bibliography

Enoch, David and Joshua Schechter (2008). “How Are Basic Belief-Forming Methods Justified?” In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76.3, pp. 547–579. Evers, Daan and Bart Streumer (2016). “Are the Moral Fixed Points Concep- tual Truths?” In: Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 1, pp. 1–9. Ferrero, Luca (2009). “Constitutivism and the Inescapability of Agency”. In: Oxford Studies in Metaethics 4, pp. 303–333. Field, Hartry (1994). “Deflationist Views of Meaning and Content”. In: Mind 103.411, pp. 249–285. Fine, Kit (2001). “The Question of Realism”. In: ’ Imprint 1, pp. 1– 30. Finlay, Stephen (2014). Confusion of Tongues: A Theory of Normative Lan- guage.OupUsa. Geach, P. T. (1965). “Assertion”. In: The Philosophical Review 74, pp. 449–465. Gibbard, Allan (1990). Wise Choices, Apt Feelings: A Theory of Normative Judgment. Harvard University Press. —(2009).Thinking how to live. Harvard University Press. Hare, R. M. (1952). The Language of Morals. Oxford Clarendon Press. Harman, Gilbert (1987). “(Nonsolipsistic) Conceptual Role Semantics”. In: Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic. Ed. by Ernest LePore. Academic Press, pp. 242–256. — (1998). “Ethics and Observation”. In: Ethical Theory 1: The Question of Objectivity. Ed. by James Rachels. Oxford University Press. Hattiangadi, Anandi (2003). “Making It Implicit: Brandom on Rule Following”. In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66.2, pp. 419–431. Heath, Joseph (2001). “Brandom et les sources de la normativité”. In: Philosophiques 28.1, pp. 27–46. Hempel, Carl (1965). Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the . The Free Press. Bibliography 143

Horgan, Terence and Mark Timmons (1991). “New Wave Moral Realism Meets Moral Twin Earth”. In: Journal of Philosophical Research 16, pp. 447–465. — (1992a). “Troubles for New Wave Moral Semantics: The ’Open Question Argument’ Revived”. In: Philosophical Papers 21.3, pp. 153–175. — (1992b). “Troubles on Moral Twin Earth: Moral Queerness Revived”. In: Synthese 92.2, pp. 221–260. — (1996). “From Moral Realism to Moral Relativism in One Easy Step”. In: Critica 28.83, pp. 3–39. — (2009). “Analytical Moral Functionalism Meets Moral Twin Earth”. In: Minds, Ethics, and Conditionals: Themes From the Philosophy of Frank Jackson. Ed. by Ian Ravenscroft. Oxford University Press, pp. 221–236. Horgan, Terry and Mark Timmons (2006). “Expressivism, Yes! Relativism, No!” In: Oxford Studies in Metaethics 1, pp. 73–98. Horisk, Claire, Dorit Bar-On, and William G. Lycan (2000). “Deflationism, Meaning and Truth-Conditions”. In: Philosophical Studies 101.1, pp. 1–28. Horwich, Paul (1999). “The Minimalist Conception of Truth”. In: Truth.Ed.by Simon Blackburn and Keith Simmons. Oxford University Press. — (2000). “Norms of Truth and Meaning”. In: Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 47, pp. 19–34. Howard, Nathan Robert and N. G. Laskowski (forthcoming). “The World is Not Enough”. In: Noûs. Huemer, Michael (2005). Ethical Intuitionism. Palgrave Macmillan. Jago, Mark (2018). What Truth Is. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Katsafanas, Paul (2013). Agency and the Foundations of Ethics: Nietzschean Constitutivism. Oxford University Press UK. Kelly, Thomas and Sarah McGrath (2010). “Is Reflective Equilibrium Enough?” In: Philosophical Perspectives 24.1, pp. 325–359. Ketland, J. (2005). “Craig’s Theorem”. In: Macmillan Encyclopedia of Philos- ophy. Ed. by D. Borchert. 2005th ed. 144 Bibliography

Kölbel, Max (2008). “"True" as Ambiguous”. In: Philosophy and Phenomeno- logical Research 77.2, pp. 359–384. Korsgaard, Christine M (2009). Self-constitution: Agency, identity, and in- tegrity. Oxford University Press. Korsgaard, Christine M and Onora O’Neill (1996). The sources of normativity. Cambridge University Press. Kraut, Robert (1993). “Robust Deflationism”. In: Philosophical Review 102.2, pp. 247–263. Kripke, S.A. (1980). Naming and Necessity. Library of philosophy and logic. Wiley. isbn:9780631128014. Lenman, James (2014). “Deliberation, schmeliberation: Enoch’s indispensabil- ity argument”. In: Philosophical Studies 168.3, pp. 835–842. Loar, Brian (2006). “Language, Thought, and Meaning”. In: The Blackwell Guide to the . Ed. by Michael Devitt and Richard Hanley. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. Lynch, Michael P. (2001). “A Functionalist Theory of Truth”. In: The Nature of Truth,pp.723–750. — (2004). “Truth and Multiple Realizability”. In: Australasian Journal of Phi- losophy 82.3, pp. 384–408. — (2006). “Rewrighting Pluralism”. In: The Monist 89.1, pp. 63–84. —(2009a).Truth as One and Many. Clarendon Press. —(2009b).Truth as One and Many. Clarendon Press. MacFarlane, J. (2014). Assessment Sensitivity: Relative Truth and its Applica- tions. Context And Content. OUP Oxford. isbn:9780191021244. Mackie, John (1977). Ethics: Inventing right and wrong. Penguin UK. McPherson, Tristram and David Plunkett (2014). “Deliberative indispensabil- ity and epistemic justification”. In: O’Leary-Hawthorne, John and (1996). “How to stand up for non- cognitivists”. In: Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74.2, pp. 275–292. eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/00048409612347251. Bibliography 145

Parfit, D. (2011). On What Matters. The Berkeley Tanner Lectures. OUP Ox- ford. isbn:9780191613456. Parfit, Derek (1984). Reasons and persons. Oxford University Press. Peacocke, Christopher (2004). “Understanding Logical Constants: A Realist’s Account”. In: Studies in the and Knowledge.Ed.by T. J. Smiley and Thomas Baldwin. Published for the British Academy by Oxford University Press, p. 163. Pedersen, Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding and Douglas Edwards (2011). “Truth as One(s) and Many: On Lynch’s Alethic Functionalism”. In: Analytic Philos- ophy 52.3, pp. 213–230. Pedersen, N.J.L.L. and C.D. Wright (2013a). Truth and Pluralism: Current Debates.OUPUSA.isbn:9780195387469. Pedersen, Njll and Cory D. Wright (2013b). “Pluralism About Truth as Alethic Disjunctivism”. In: Truth and Pluralism: Current Debates.Ed.byNikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen and Cory D. Wright. Oxford University Press. Peirce, Charles Sanders (1974). Collected Papers. en. Harvard University Press. isbn:9780674138001. Peregrin, Jaroslav (2012). What is Inferentialism? Ed. by L. Gurova. Cam- bridge Scholars Pub. Plunkett, David and Timothy Sundell (2013). “Disagreement and the Seman- tics of Normative and Evaluative Terms”. In: Philosophers’ Imprint 13. Pölzler, Thomas and Jennifer Cole Wright (2019). “Empirical Research on Folk Moral Objectivism”. In: Philosophy Compass 14.5. — (forthcoming). “Anti-Realist Pluralism: A New Approach to Folk Metaethics”. In: Review of Philosophy and Psychology,pp.1–30. Price, Huw et al. (May 2013). Expressivism, and Representation- alism: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. isbn:9780511842498. Putnam, Hilary (1965). “Craig’s Theorem”. In: Journal of Philosophy 62.10, pp. 251–260. 146 Bibliography

Putnam, Hillary (1975). “The Meaning of ’Meaning’.” In: Mind, Language and Reality; Philosophical Papers 2, pp. 215–271. Raatikainen, Panu (2006). “Problems of Deflationism”. In: Truth and Games in Logic and Language. (Acta Philosophica Fennica vol. 78).Ed.byTuomo Aho and Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen, pp. 175–185. Railton, Peter (1993). “Noncognitivism About Rationality: Benefits, Costs, and an Alternative”. In: Philosophical Issues 4, pp. 36–51. Ridge, Michael (2014). Impassioned Belief. OUP Oxford. Roden, David (2017). “On Reason and Spectral Machines: and Bounded Posthumanism”. In: Philosophy After Nature.Ed.byRosi Braidotti Rick Dolphijn. London - New York: Rowman & Littlefield Inter- national, pp. 99–119. Rosati, Connie S (2003). “Agency and the Open Question Argument*”. In: Ethics 113.3, pp. 490–527. Salmon, Wesley (1971). Statistical Explanation & Statistical Relevance.Uni- versity of Pittsburgh Press. Sarkissian, Hagop et al. (2014). “Folk Moral Relativism”. In: Experimental Phi- losophy: Volume 2.Ed.byJoshuaKnobeandShaunNichols,pp.169–192. Scanlon, T. M. (2003). “Rawls on Justification”. In: The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Ed. by Samuel Richard Freeman. Cambridge University Press, p. 139. —(2014).Being realistic about reasons. Oxford University Press. Schoenfield, Miriam (2016). “Moral Vagueness Is Ontic Vagueness”. In: Ethics 126.2, pp. 257–282. Schroeter, Laura and François Schroeter (2003). “A slim semantics for thin moral terms?” In: Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81.2, pp. 191–207. Searle, John R. (1962). “Meaning and Speech Acts”. In: The Philosophical Review 71, pp. 423–432. Silverstein, Matthew (2015). “The shmagency question”. In: Philosophical Stud- ies. Bibliography 147

Simpson, Matthew (2018). “Solving the Problem of Creeping Minimalism”. In: Canadian Journal of Philosophy 48.3-4, pp. 510–531. Sinclair, Neil (2017). “Conceptual Role Semantics and the Reference of Moral Concepts”. In: European Journal of Philosophy 1, pp. 95–121. Smith, Michael (2015). “The Magic of Constitutivism”. In: American Philo- sophical Quarterly 52.2, pp. 187–200. Street, Sharon (2006). “A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value”. In: Philosophical Studies 127.1, pp. 109–166. Streumer, Bart (2017). Unbelievable Errors: An Error Theory About All Nor- mative Judgments. Oxford University Press. Stroud, Barry (1968). “Transcendental Arguments”. In: Journal of Philosophy 65.9, pp. 241–256. Tappolet, Christine (1997). “Mixed : A Problem for Pluralism About Truth Predicates”. In: Analysis 57.3, pp. 209–210. — (2000). “Truth Pluralism and Many-Valued Logics: A Reply to Beall”. In: The Philosophical Quarterly (1950-) 50.200, pp. 382–385. issn:0031-8094. Tarski, Alfred (1944). “The Semantic Conception of Truth: And the Foun- dations of Semantics”. In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4.3, pp. 341–376. Tiefensee, Christine (2016). “Inferentialist metaethics, bifurcations and onto- logical commitment”. In: Philosophical Studies 173.9, pp. 2437–2459. issn: 1573-0883. — (2018). “Error-Theory, Relaxation and Inferentialism”. In: Moral Skepti- cism. Ed. by Diego E. Machuca. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 49–70. — (2019). “Saving Which Differences? Creeping Minimalism and Disagree- ment”. In: Philosophical Studies 176.7, pp. 1905–1921. Velleman, J David (2009). How we get along. Cambridge University Press. Veluwenkamp, Herman (2017). “Parfit’s and Scanlon’s Non-Metaphysical Moral Realism as Alethic Pluralism”. In: Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 20.4, pp. 751–761. 148 Bibliography

Veluwenkamp, Herman (forthcoming). “Inferentialist Truth Pluralism”. In: Eth- ical Theory and Moral Practice. Warren, Mark Douglas (2015). “Moral inferentialism and the Frege-Geach problem”. In: Philosophical Studies 172.11, pp. 2859–2885. issn:1573-0883. Wedgwood, Ralph (2001). “Conceptual Role Semantics for Moral Terms”. In: Philosophical Review 110.1, pp. 1–30. —(2007).The Nature of Normativity. Oxford University Press. — (2015). “Review of Being Realistic About Reasons, by T. M. Scanlon”. In: Philosophical Quarterly. —(2017).The Value of Rationality. Oxford University Press. Williams, M. (2010). “Pragmatism, Minimalism, Expressivism”. In: Interna- tional Journal of Philosophical Studies 18.3, pp. 317–30. Williams, Michael (1999). “Meaning and Deflationary Truth”. In: Journal of Philosophy 96.11, pp. 545–564. Williamson, Timothy (1994). Vagueness. Routledge. Woodward, James (2017). “Scientific Explanation”. In: The Stanford Ency- clopedia of Philosophy. Ed. by Edward N. Zalta. Fall 2017. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Wright, Crispin (1992). Truth and Objectivity. Harvard University Press. Wright, Jennifer C., Piper T. Grandjean, and Cullen B. McWhite (2013). “The Meta-Ethical Grounding of Our Moral Beliefs: Evidence for Meta-Ethical Pluralism”. In: Philosophical Psychology 26.3, pp. 336–361. Young, James O. (2018). “The Coherence Theory of Truth”. In: The Stan- ford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. by Edward N. Zalta. Fall 2018. Meta- physics Research Lab, Stanford University.