DOCSLIB.ORG

Completion Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Completion Report Arab Republic of Egypt Feasibility Study for Alexandria West Wastewater Treatment Plant Extension and Upgrade Reference code: TA2016022 EG FTF Environmental & Social Impact In association with Munich, Germany Enviro Consult, Cairo, Egypt and INFRA Engineering, Cairo, Egypt September 2018 Final The authors take full responsibility for the contents of this report. The opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the view of DFID, the European Union or the European Investment Bank © Dorsch International Consultants GmbH in association with EnviroConsult and Infra Engineering Date of issue: 17th September 2018 Final VERSION Prepared: Dr. Tarek Salaheldin / Dr. Dirk Matzke Approved: Keith Brooke Feasibility Study for Alexandria West Wastewater Treatment Plant Extension and ESIA Upgrade Project No.: TA2016022 EG FTF TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents .................................................................................. ii Tables .................................................................................................... v Figures ................................................................................................. vii Abbreviations ..................................................................................... viii 1 Non-technical Summary ............................................................ 10 1.1 Background .................................................................................................. 10 1.2 Legal and Institutional Framework ............................................................... 10 1.3 Public Participation and Stakeholder Engagement ...................................... 10 1.4 Current Alexandria West WWTP Status and Proposed Upgrade ................ 11 1.5 Impact Identification and Assessment .......................................................... 13 1.6 Mitigation Measures and Environmental & Social Management Plan .......... 14 1.7 Final ESIA Requirements ............................................................................. 14 2 Introduction ................................................................................ 16 2.1 Background .................................................................................................. 16 2.2 Objectives of the Alexandria West WWTP Extension and Upgrade Project 16 2.3 Objectives of the ESIA ................................................................................. 17 2.4 Scope and Purpose of the Draft ESIA Report .............................................. 18 2.5 ESIA Approach and Methodology ................................................................ 19 2.5.1 Methodology .................................................................................................................. 19 2.6 Public Participation and Stakeholder Engagement ...................................... 19 3 Project Description including Alternatives .............................. 21 3.1 General ........................................................................................................ 21 3.2 Description of Current Alexandria West WWTP Conditions ......................... 21 3.2.5 Sludge Disposal and Reuse .......................................................................................... 26 3.2.6 Effluent Discharge ......................................................................................................... 27 3.3 Associated Environmental and Social Constraints ....................................... 28 3.4 Wastewater Treatment Technology Alternatives ......................................... 29 3.5 Treated Effluent Reuse Alternatives ............................................................ 34 Dorsch International Consultants GmbH in association with EnviroConsult and Infra Engineering ii Feasibility Study for Alexandria West Wastewater Treatment Plant Extension and ESIA Upgrade Project No.: TA2016022 EG FTF 3.6 Sludge Treatment and Disposal Alternatives ............................................... 35 3.6.1 Sludge Treatment Alternatives ...................................................................................... 35 3.6.2 Sludge Disposal and Reuse .......................................................................................... 35 3.7 Project Significance and ‘No Project’ Alternative Analysis ........................... 37 4 Legal and Institutional Framework ........................................... 38 4.1 Donor Safeguard Requirements and Applicable Standards ......................... 38 4.1.1 EIB Environmental and Social Practices Handbook ...................................................... 38 4.2 Core Labour Standards (CLS) of the International Labour Organisation ..... 39 4.3 Relevant National Legislative and Regulatory Framework ........................... 40 4.3.1 Relevant Egyptian Environmental Legislations ............................................................. 41 4.3.2 Relevant Egyptian Social Legislations .......................................................................... 47 5 Environmental and Social Baseline Conditions ...................... 49 5.1 Physical Environment .................................................................................. 49 5.1.1 Topography .................................................................................................................... 49 5.1.2 Geology ......................................................................................................................... 50 5.1.3 Climate and Meteorology ............................................................................................... 50 5.1.4 Water Resources ........................................................................................................... 51 5.1.5 Air Quality ...................................................................................................................... 52 5.1.6 Noise and Vibration ....................................................................................................... 52 5.1.7 Risks and Hazards within the WWTP Site .................................................................... 52 5.2 Biological Environment ................................................................................ 52 5.2.1 Flora, Fauna, Habitats ................................................................................................... 52 5.2.1 Lake Maryout Ecological System .................................................................................. 53 5.3 Socio-economic Conditions ......................................................................... 53 5.3.1 Population Profile........................................................................................................... 54 5.3.2 General Social ............................................................................................................... 54 5.3.3 Economic Profile Activities and Livelihoods .................................................................. 54 5.3.4 Water Supply Service .................................................................................................... 54 5.3.5 Sanitation Services ........................................................................................................ 54 5.3.6 Infrastructure Services ................................................................................................... 54 5.3.7 Human Health ................................................................................................................ 54 5.3.8 Education ....................................................................................................................... 54 5.3.9 Antiquities and Sites of Cultural and Historical Importance .......................................... 54 6 Outcome of the Public Participation and Stakeholder Engagement Process .......................................................................... 55 6.1 Methodology ................................................................................................ 55 Dorsch International Consultants GmbH in association with EnviroConsult and Infra Engineering iii Feasibility Study for Alexandria West Wastewater Treatment Plant Extension and ESIA Upgrade Project No.: TA2016022 EG FTF 6.2 Organisation of Public Consultation ............................................................. 55 6.3 Major Outcomes........................................................................................... 55 7 Impact Identification and Analysis ........................................... 57 7.1 Impact Significance Assessment ................................................................. 57 7.2 Potential Impacts during WWTP Construction Phase .................................. 58 7.2.1 Physical Environment .................................................................................................... 58 7.2.1.1 Climate and Atmosphere (climate check) ...................................................................... 63 7.2.2 Biological Environment .................................................................................................. 66 7.2.3 Potential Social and Health Impacts .............................................................................. 67 7.3 Potential Impacts during WWTP Operation Phase ...................................... 70 7.3.1 Physical Environment .................................................................................................... 70 7.3.2 Biological Environment .................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Integrated Supply-Demand Planning for Alexandria, Egypt
    BLINDCOPY LOREM IPSUM INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE FUTURES UTS: THINK.CHANGE.DO >CHI>IJI:;DGHJHI6>C67A:;JIJG:H >H;/G:H:6G8= >CI:<G6I:9HJEEAN"9:B6C9EA6CC>C< ;DG6A:M6C9G>6!:<NEI '%&& INTEGRATED SUPPLY-DEMAND PLANNING FOR ALEXANDRIA, EGYPT Water efficiency study & business case analysis for water demand management Draft For EU-SWITCH / CEDARE Authors Stuart White, Monique Retamal Institute for Sustainable Futures UTS 2011 Institute for Sustainable Futures, UTS March 2011 DISCLAIMER While all due care and attention has been taken to establish the accuracy of the material published, UTS/ISF and the authors disclaim liability for any loss that may arise from any person acting in reliance upon the contents of this document. Please cite this report as: Retamal, M, White, S., 2011, Integrated supply-demand planning for Alexandria, Egypt: water efficiency study & business case analysis for water demand management. Prepared for CEDARE by the Institute for Sustainable Futures, University of Technology, Sydney. Alexandria Water Efficiency Study i Institute for Sustainable Futures, UTS November 2010 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank Dr Dr. Khaled AbuZeid, Eng. Mohamed Elrawady, Nermin Riad and other staff from CEDARE, Eng. Nadia Abdou, Eng. Hanan Taha and Eng. Noha Sabry from the Alexandria Water Company and Prof. Dr. Alaa Yassin from Alexandria University. Many other stakeholders in Alexandria and Cairo agreed to be interviewed as part of this research and their support for the project is greatly appreciated. Alexandria Water Efficiency Study ii Institute for Sustainable Futures, UTS November 2010 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Water availability in Egypt is highly constrained, due to its dependence on a fixed national share of the Nile River basin and population growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Business in Egypt 2014
    Doing Business in Egypt 2014 Comparing Business Regulations for Domestic Firms in 15 Locations and 5 Ports with 188 other Economies Doing Business in Egypt 2014 Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises Comparing Business Regulations for Domestic Firms in 15 Locations and 5 Ports with 188 other Economies © 2013 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000; Internet: www.worldbank.org Some rights reserved 1 2 3 4 15 14 13 12 A copublication of The World Bank and the International Finance Corporation. This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions. Note that The World Bank does not necessarily own each component of the content included in the work. The World Bank therefore does not warrant that the use of the content contained in the work will not infringe on the rights of third parties. The risk of claims resulting from such infringement rests solely with you. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accu- racy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Nothing herein shall constitute or be considered to be a limitation upon or waiver of the privileges and immunities of The World Bank, all of which are specifically reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Infrastructure Strategies in New Borg El-Arab City
    SUSTAINABLE REGENERATION OF URBAN GREEN AREAS IN EGYPT’S DESERT CITIES ADOPTING GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE STRATEGIES IN NEW BORG EL-ARAB CITY Mahmoud Hussein SUSTAINABLE REGENERATION OF URBAN GREEN AREAS IN EGYPT’S DESERT CITIES ADOPTING GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE STRATEGIES IN NEW BORG EL-ARAB CITY A Thesis Presented to: HafenCity University By: Mahmoud Moursy Hussein In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree: Master of Science in Resource Efficiency in Architecture and Planning HafenCity University, Hamburg, Germany February, 2018 Approved By: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Wolfgang Dickhaut Dipl.-Ing. Sonja Schlipf (Date) (Signature) A Mahmoud Hussein - Master Thesis B DECLARATION OF AUTHORSHIP To the best of my knowledge I hereby declare that I have written this thesis submitted in part of the fulfillment of the Master of Science degree in Resource Efficiency in Architecture and Planning to the Hafencity University, without any help from others and without the use of documents and aids other than those cited according to established academic citation rules, and that it has not been submitted at any other university for any degree. (Date) (Signature) I Mahmoud Hussein - Master Thesis ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This thesis would not have been possible without the guidance and the help of several individuals who in one way or another contributed and extended their valuable assistance in the preparation and accomplishment of this study. I would like to extend my profound gratitude to my supervisor Prof. Wolfgang Dickhaut and co-supervisor Dipl. Ing. Sonja Schlipf for their continuous support of my thesis and throughout my studies in REAP. My sincere thanks also goes to my family for all their love, patience, wishes and support throughout writing this thesis and my life in general.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Environmental and Social Impacts
    E1437 v. 2 vol. 3 Arab Republic of Egypt Public Disclosure Authorized Governorate of Alexandria Public Disclosure Authorized Alexandria Development Project Public Disclosure Authorized Integrated Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (IESIA) Final Report June 21, 2007 Public Disclosure Authorized HASKONINGvol. NEDERLAND 3 B.V. ENVIRONMENT 27 Yehia Ibrahim St., Apt 4 Barbarossastraat 35 Zamalek P.O. Box 151 Cairo 11311 Nijmegen 6500 AD Egypt The Netherlands +20 (2) 7351045 Telephone +31 (0)24 328 42 84 Telephone +20 (2) 7383091 Fax +31(24)323 1603 Fax [email protected] E-mail [email protected] E-mail www.nsce-inter.com Internet www.royalhaskoning.com Internet Arnhem 09122561 CoC Document title Alexandria Development Project Integrated Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (IESIA) Document short title IESIA, ADP Status Final Report Date June 21, 2007 Project name Integrated Environmental and Social Impact Assessment for the Alexandria Development Project Client Alexandria Governorate vol. 3 Abbreviations ABA Alexandria Businessmen Association ADP Alexandria Development Project ARP Abbreviated Resettlement Plan ASDCO Alexandria Sanitary Drainage Company AUDI Arab Urban Development Institute AWCO Alexandria Water Company CAA Competent Administrative Authority CDD Community Driven Development CDS City Development Strategy CEPT Chemically Enhance Primary Treatment DO Dissolved Oxygen DWTP Drinking Water Treatment Plant EEAA Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency EGP Egyptian Pound EHD Environmental Health Department
    [Show full text]
  • SWITCH in the City Putting Urban Water Management to the Test
    SWITCH in the city putting urban water management to the test Edited by John Butterworth, Peter McIntyre and Carmen da Silva Wells SWITCH in the city putting urban water management to the test Edited by John Butterworth, Peter McIntyre and Carmen da Silva Wells IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre The Hague, The Netherlands Butterworth, J., McIntyre, P. & da Silva Wells, C. 2011. SWITCH in the city: putting urban water management to the test. The Hague, The Netherlands, IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre. Table of contents Preface iv part 1 Learning from SWITCH 1.1 Introduction 2 1.2 What have we learned? 16 1.3 Perspectives on learning alliances as an innovative mechanism for change 38 part 2 City case studies 2.1 The potential for treated wastewater use in Lima 68 2.2 Cali: city of seven rivers 84 2.3 Starting at the top: preventing pollution from tanneries and cleaning up the Río Bogotá 92 2.4 Water management and urban planning in Belo Horizonte 110 2.5 Learning together makes strategic planning possible for fast growing Accra 120 Published on behalf of the SWITCH consortium 2.6 Integrated urban water management planning in Alexandria 138 by the IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre. 2.7 Managing water risks in Birmingham: the city with the tastiest tap water in Britain 158 2.8 Zaragoza: taking pride in integrated water management 178 2.9 Hamburg: city with the largest river island in Europe 188 Copy editor 2.10 Lodz: city of water 202 Cheryl White 2.11 Tel Aviv Water Club puts focus on wastewater treatment
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Planning Process
    Contributors Team Leader: Prof. Dr. Khaled M. Abu-Zeid, CEDARE International Coordinator: Dr. Peter Van Der Steen, UNESCO-IHE Authors: Prof. Dr. Khaled M. Abu-Zeid, CEDARE Prof. Alaa Yasseen, Alexandria University Dr. Peter Van Der Steen, UNESCO-IHE, the Netherlands Eng. Philip Sharp, Battus Associates, United Kingdom Eng. Mohamed Elrawady, CEDARE CEDARE Coordinator: Eng. Mohamed Elrawady, CEDARE Version September 2011 Table of content 1. INTRODUCTION:.............................................................................................................................................1 A. TOPOGRAPHY.................................................................................................................................................3 B. CLIMATICCONDITIONS......................................................................................................................................4 C. LANDUSE......................................................................................................................................................4 2. BACKGROUNDTOSTRATEGICPLANNING:.......................................................................................................6 A. THESWITCHPROJECT:....................................................................................................................................6 B. THELEARNINGALLIANCE:..................................................................................................................................7 THECURRENTSITUATION:....................................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Arab Republic of Egypt Public Disclosure Authorized
    E1437 v. 1 Arab Republic of Egypt Public Disclosure Authorized Governorate of Alexandria Public Disclosure Authorized Alexandria Development Project Integrated Environmental and Social Impact Public Disclosure Authorized Assessment (IESIA) Executive Summary June 21, 2007 Public Disclosure Authorized A COMPANY OF HASKONING NEDERLAND B.V. ENVIRONMENT 27 Yehia Ibrahim St., Aprt 4 Barbarossastraat 35 Zamalek P.O. Box 151 Cairo 11311 Nijmegen 6500 AD Egypt The Netherlands +20 (2) 7351045 Telephone +31 (0)24 328 42 84 Telephone +20 (2) 7383091 Fax +31(24)323 1603 Fax [email protected] E-mail [email protected] E-mail www.nsce-inter.com Internet www.royalhaskoning.com Internet Arnhem 09122561 CoC Document title Alexandria Development Project Integrated Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Document short title Executive Summary of IESIA for the ADP Status Final Date June 21, 2007 Project name Integrated Environmental and Social Impact Assessment for the Alexandria Development Project Client Governorate of Alexandria ABBREVIATIONS ADP Alexandria Development Project ARP Abbreviated Resettlement Plan ASDCO Alexandria Sanitary Drainage Company AUDI Arab Urban Development Institute AWCO Alexandria Water Company CAA Competent Administrative Authority CDS City Development Strategy DO Dissolved Oxygen DWTP Drinking Water Treatment Plant EEAA Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency EGP Egyptian Pound EHD Environmental Health -Department EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMU Environmental Management Unit (Governorate) EPAP Egyptian
    [Show full text]
  • UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, Delft, the Netherlands
    UNESCO-IHE INSTITUTE FOR WATER EDUCATION Fresh Water Swaps: Potential for Wastewater Reuse A Case Study of Alexandria, Egypt Masoomullah Hamdard MSc Thesis ES.10.03 April 2010 Fresh Water Swaps: Potential for Wastewater Reuse A Case Study of Alexandria, Egypt Master of Science Thesis by Masoomullah Hamdard Supervisors Prof. Dr. Meine Pieter van Dijk (UNESCO-IHE) Dr. Mathew Kurian (UNESCO-IHE) Examination committee Prof. Dr. Meine Pieter van Dijk (UNESCO-IHE), Chairman Dr. Mathew Kurian (UNESCO-IHE) Dr. Sunil Tankha (ISS) This research is done for the partial fulfilment of requirements for the Master of Science degree at the UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, Delft, the Netherlands Delft April, 2010 The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed in this study do neither necessarily reflect the views of the UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, nor of the individual members of the MSc committee, nor of their respective employers. This work is dedicated to my beloved parents Abstract Secondary towns are confronted with the challenge of rapid pollution growth, particularly in the developing countries. This has resulted in unplanned urban expansion, bringing in more rural areas within the boundaries of cities and causing many administrative conflicts and poor services delivery. This situation is more alarming in the context of water scarce countries. The escalating living standards with increasing water demand and the need to expend agriculture land to meet the food requirements, has resulted in water competition between various water competitors. Another challenge that developing countries are confronted with is the safe disposal of increasing urban wastewater. This study focuses on the reuse of urban wastewater by assessing the scope, financial constraints and social perception of acceptability on wastewater reuse.
    [Show full text]
  • 3Rd Mediterranean Water Forum
    rd 3 Mediterranean Water Forum nd th January 22 -24 , 2018 Cairo, Egypt Future for the Mediterranean 1. BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................................... 4 .2 FORUM AGENDA ...................................................................................................................... 7 3. FORUM ACTIVITIES ................................................................................................................. 11 3.1. THEMATIC MEDITERRANEAN WORKING GROUP REPORT ................................................ 23 3.2. PANEL SESSION REPORT .................................................................................................... 31 3.2.1. HIGH LEVEL PANEL ..................................................................................................... 32 3.2.2. PANELS ....................................................................................................................... 38 3.2.3. SIDE EVENTS .............................................................................................................. 43 3.3. EXHIBITION ........................................................................................................................ 57 4. APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................ 60 4.1. Photo ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Azza Sirry ALEXANDRIA
    ALEXANDRIA: DEVELOPMENT CHALLENGES OF A COASTAL SECOND CITY Azza Sirry Housing and Building National Research Center (HBRC), Cairo and Associate of Metropolis 1. Introduction The first city, the capital, usually gets Many Mediterranean cities entered the new millennium facing challenges all the attention, the due to the changing needs of urban demographics and housing demand, the requirements of industrial and commercial activities, and the projects and a bigger technological innovations of the new century. Added to these challenges share of the budget. As are those brought about by globalisation. The impact of globalisation on a consequence, second cities has been as vast as it has been varied. The liberalisation of trade and cities often face special the free flow of capital have in global terms put cities rather than nations at the forefront of economic competition (DPU, 2002). We see cities from the challenges that result same countries competing with each other, such as Dubai and Abu Dhabi. from their relationships The problem is whether cities can identify problems accurately and then set with their respective priorities wisely. Another issue is who sets these priorities and who takes states. decisions, especially if such cities are second cities. Every country has a capital city, the seat of government. The second-largest city or second metropolitan area is usually called a second city and often has a distinct economic dynamic and sense of cultural identity. In some cases the second city might be more populous than the capital, as in India where Calcutta is bigger than the capital Delhi. Many second cities, especially in the Mediterranean basin, are ports.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Water Management in Cities: Engaging Stakeholders for Effective Change and Action. Final Report
    Sustainable Water Management in Cities: Engaging Stakeholders for Effective Change and Action Zaragoza, Spain 13-17 December 2010 FINAL REPORT www.un.org/waterforlifedecade/swm_cities_zaragoza_2010 INDEX 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 4 1.1 About the organisers........................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Focus and objectives ........................................................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Programme agenda ............................................................................................................................................. 6 2. OPENING SESSION ......................................................................................................................................... 6 3. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT: CITY EXPERIENCES ......................................................................... 7 3.1 Challenges in stakeholder engagement ...................................................................................................... 7 3.2 Transferable lessons and success factors for stakeholder engagement from the SWITCH project ....................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SWITCH Transition Manual Fourth Draft for Carol Howe Dundee, Scotland February 2011
    Managing Water for the City of the Future The SWITCH Transition Manual Fourth Draft for Carol Howe Dundee, Scotland February 2011 The SWITCH Transition Manual The principal authors of this document were: Chris Jefferies & Alison Duffy University of Abertay Dundee, United Kingdom: [email protected] ISBN 1-899796-23-1 (10 digit) and 978-1-899796-23-6. (13 Digit) Table of Contents Section 1 Setting the Scene Section 3 The Transition Management Cycle 35 Introduction 3 The Transition Management Cycle What’s the problem – Why SWITCH from the old paradigm? 5 Transition Management Activities 35 Examples of the problem 6 Transition Management Clusters 35 What can we do about it? 7 What is the new paradigm? 8 The Arena 36 What might a transition city look like? 10 The Agenda 38 Examples of moving towards the new paradigm 12 Experiments 39 What is transitioning? 15 Monitoring, Evaluating, Learning 40 The Multi-Phase Concept 16 Multi-Level Perspective 17 41 Transition Management 19 Transition Management Activities Transition Management Levels 20 Develop the Transition Arena 42 The Strategic Level 21 Organise / Facilitate Stakeholders 43 The Tactical Level 21 The Operational Level 22 Identify Problems and Issues 44 Develop Long Term Integrated Vision 44 Section 2 The SWITCH Transition Framework Developing Transition Agenda 45 Explained Transition Experiments 46 Identify Responsible Parties 47 The Transition Framework 25 The Transition Management Cycle 25 Process Documentation & Capacity Building 47 Transition Management Clusters 26 Evaluation
    [Show full text]