Jbimfall 2007 Your Not Parents’ Way of Doing Business
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Journal of Building Information Modeling An official publication of the National BIM Standard (NBIMS) and the National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS) JBIMFall 2007 Your Not Parents’ Way of Doing Business Approaches to Transforming the Construction Industry Permit No. 14 No. Permit Pembina, ND Pembina, PAID U.S. Postage U.S. PRSRT STD PRSRT Feature Building Information Models and Model Views By Richard See, Managing Director, Digital Alchemy IN THE LAST FEW YEARS, we have seen government funded research in this area in designing buildings and integrated data- a great deal of marketing and press about that ultimately led to early building model- base techniques to support more sophisti- Building Information Modeling (BIM). By ing systems including BDS (Building De- cated models and extending the association now, most people in the industry must sign System) and RUCAPS which were of data with geometric representations1. have a vague understanding of what BIM used by early adopters in the UK and U.S. These techniques were later adopted or is, but may find some additional back- through the mid 1980s. Even these first emulated in commercial products. ground, some specific examples, and generation building modeling systems in- These early systems were generally more detail about how BIMs will improve cluded some of the concepts central to developed by people in the building indus- quality, reduce costs, and enable new today’s BIM authoring software. Concepts try that had a vision of using the computer business processes should be of interest including parametric element definition, to prototype buildings as assemblies of to most. building element libraries, multiple repre- building elements rather than using the This is the first in a two-part article sentations (graphic and analytic), and computer to create the same design that will provide background about the drawings as view or graphic reports gen- drawings that had been used to describe evolution of building modeling concepts erated from an integrated building model. buildings for centuries. and systems, why product neutral BIMs RUCAPS was replaced by a second are important, and how such BIMs will en- generation building modeling system PRODUCT INFORMATION MODELS able intelligent data sharing and enable the called SONATA in 1986 and saw much Throughout the 1980s, similar model- AECO industries to realize the kinds of ef- wider adoption, particularly in the UK, al- ing initiatives emerged in various manufac- ficiencies and quality improvements en- though it was limited by the fact that it re- turing and more specialized construction joyed by manufacturing industries today. quired a workstation computer when industries. Common interests and needs Part 1 of this article provides background other drafting oriented CAD systems in these groups and projects eventually on building modeling, the larger context would run on personal computers. How- led to the formalization of the concept of of product models, and initiatives to de- ever, in this same timeframe, a PC based Product Information Models and develop- fine a global standard for BIMs. Part 2 of building model system, ArchiCAD, was ment of STEP (the Standard for the Ex- this article will introduce the notion of maturing and beginning to build a user change of Product Model Data) and ISO Model Views, which are much like data- based that continues today. standard 10303.2 STEP has vigorously sup- base views, how these views are defined, In parallel, the GLIDE (Graphical Lan- ported and widely adopted in the auto- and how they will ensure predictable in- guage for Interactive Design), GLIDE-II, motive, aerospace, process plant, and ship teroperability experience when used for and CAEADS (Computer Aided Engineer- building industries, where the benefits of exchange of BIM data between applica- ing and Architectural Design System) sys- Product Information Modeling (improved tions. tems were developed by the CAD-Graph- information sharing, efficiency, and quality) ics Laboratory at Carnegie-Mellon have been widely observed and reported EARLY BUILDING MODELING SYSTEMS University. Although not released as com- in the past decade. The notion of building modeling is not mercial products, they introduced more One perspective is that the concept of new. As early at the mid 1970’s the UK advanced solid modeling geometry for use Product Information Models, as intro- duced by STEP, formalized, harmonized, An example of a 2D image. and standardized of concepts developed in many of the earlier projects and prod- ucts (some of which are cited above). A Product Information Model can be thought of as a database of the product to be manufactured. That database can in- clude a wide array of information about the product, including geometry, material, manufacturing and assembly techniques, tolerances, costs, and even information to support supply chain management, or it 20 Journal of Building Information Modeling may include only some of these. The sig- BUILDING INFORMATION MODELS As with Product Models, a BIM can be nificant improvement of Product Informa- Building Information Models or BIMs thought of as a database of the building tion Models (and the pioneering products should be thought of as the building industry’s project. The information in this database mentioned above) over previous product application of Product Information Modeling will someday span the full range of data representations is that they are integrated concepts where the product is a building. we now manage for building projects, but information sets, which means data is ref- Early implementations of BIM have as an integrated data set. As such, BIMs erenced rather than repeated. This elimi- been very “geometry centric”, but this is are multi-representational, multi-dimen- nation of redundancy and reuse of data beginning to expand now to inclusion of sional, and integrate the information cre- can/should lead to improved consistency, properties for use in analysis applications ated by many industry domains. accuracy, efficiency, and quality—all of like energy use simulation, quantity take- Figure 2 is a simple example of BIM which lead to better products and pro- off, cost estimating, construction planning objects, properties, and relationships.3 ductivity. and various types of engineering analysis. Continued on Page 24 Figure 2 – A simple example of BIM objects, properties Figure 3 and relationships.3 Fall 2007 21 Continued from Page 21 and connection relationships between prototyping eventually led to the forma- Objects spaces are what enable automated tion of the Industry Alliance for Interoper- BIM Models contain many types of ob- egress checking in a building model. ability (IAI), which included 12 industry jects. The most commonly understood Our example includes all of the fol- leading companies, led by Autodesk, that are object representing the physical ele- lowing relationships (See Figure 3): developed the original Industry Founda- ments of the building. Our small example Visible tion Classes (IFC). IFC was introduced as includes: 1. Connection; the “common language for interoperabili- • Wall; 2. Voids (an opening in the wall); and ty in the building industry” at the 1995 • Door; 3. Supports. AEC Systems conference in Atlanta. All 12 • Window; Not Visible companies demonstrated prototype appli- • Column; 1. Bounds (walls, floor bound cations (AutoCAD and Add-ons) that in- • Beam; and space); teroperated on a shared building model. • Floor slab. 2. Contains (Project>Building> Seeing the industry excitement gener- But BIM models also include many Story>bldg elements and space); and ated by the initial launch of IFC, the IAI other object types that define abstract 3. Connects (space to door, win- member companies made the decision to concepts and relationships like: relation- dow, and adjacent spaces). open its membership to all companies in ships (for example connection and adja- the building industry. By the end of 1995, cency), object type definition (for exam- Early implementations there were several international chapters ple wall type and door type), hierarchies of BIM have been very and hundreds of member companies in (for example containment), grouping the renamed International Alliance for In- (for example zones and systems). “geometry centric”, teroperability (IAI). Several “Domain 2D geometry Teams” were also formed, to define the 2D Plan drawings are generated as but this is beginning to end user processes to be served by a first geometric views or reports of the public release of IFC specifications for a “plan” shape representations of the ob- expand now to standardized BIM. jects in the model. It is important to inclusion of properties Design and development of IFC by this note that the “plan” representation uses larger, more international alliance was industry standard symbolic graphics (e.g. for use in analysis very much influenced by STEP and in fact, door swing) whereas the “3D” repre- IFC makes use of many parts of the STEP sentation uses 3D physical geometry. applications like energy standard, including: the EXPRESS model- The image on page 20 shows two sepa- ing language, the STEP physical file for- rate representations of a single object. use simulation, mat, and schemas for geometry and 3D geometry quantity takeoff, cost topology. 3D views are generated as geomet- Release 1.0 of the IFC Schema for BIM ric views of the “3D” shape representa- estimating, was published by IAI in January 1997, IFC tion. Release 1.5 followed in November 1997, Properties construction planning and IFC Release 2.0 April of 1999. To date, Properties are attached to BIM ob- there have been 7 releases of IFC, as de- jects to identify or describe them in and various types of scribed on the IAI web site (www.iai-inter- some way. The range of possibilities for engineering analysis. national.org). The current release is IFC these properties is as wide as all the 2x3. Each of these, beginning with 2.0, contexts in which they will be consid- BIM STANDARDIZATION AND could be exchanged between applications ered in a project, from design through INTEROPERABILITY using the STEP physical file format (.IFC) construction and operation.