The Roots of Bim

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Roots of Bim Műszaki Tudományos Közlemények vol. 12. (2020) 42–49. DOI English: https://doi.org/10.33894/mtk-2020.12.06 Hungarian: https://doi.org/10.33895/mtk-2020.12.06 THE ROOTS OF BIM Ferdinánd-Zsongor GOBESZ Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Facultyof Civil Engineering, Department of Structural Mechanics, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, [email protected] Abstract Today's architectural and civil engineering design is almost inconceivable without collaborative tools. Build- ing Information Modeling supports this with a set of collaboratively usable data. The roots of this concept go back in the past, thus the present paper attempts to depict some of the milestones in its evolution. Keywords: building, information, modeling, history. 1. Introduction 2. Product data evolution In most simple terms, BIM (Building Informa- The first technical drawing book [7] was pub- tion Modeling) is a digital representation of the lished in France towards the end of the 18th physical and functional characteristics of a build- century, opening the way for technical graph- ics. Technical drawing has become one of the ing [1] in a unified model which can be applied, pillars of engineering design. On the one hand, managed and used in collaboration by all the it was able to show the structures in parts, and actors in the construction industry. Its practical on the other hand, it provided a more detailed application is through computer-aided software product description (specifying more accurately packages, be it planning, construction manage- the product data). Computer-aided design was ment, valuation, operation and maintenance, or also based on graphic design at first. Comput- other building-related activities. By incorporating er graphics offered more advantages than hand all the physical and functional characteristics of drawing in terms of tracking design changes and a building into a manageable model, there are storing design data. Although it was easy enough to make additional sketches or write comments many benefits. Perhaps the most important of and suggestions on hand drawings, interpreting these is the accuracy of the model's design, as it them required more cumbersome work. In en- avoids constraints and shortcomings in construc- gineering companies where technical activities tion that require intervention at the expense of involved not only design but also manufacturing quality, cost, and execution time. or maintenance, hand drawings did not provide The idea of such computer modeling of struc- sufficient productivity. The situation was similar tures began to materialize in the early 1970s, and in the technical production chains, where several in the mid-1980s articles were published in which companies were involved in the design, imple- practical possibilities and relevant examples mentation and maintenance of a product. When different CAD / CAM tools were used, data conver- were discussed [2, 3]. The term "Building Infor- sions hampered effective collaboration. Thus, the mation Models" appeared first in a paper publis- need arose to develop a neutral intermediate for- hed in 1992 [4], but it has come into the public mat that would facilitate data exchange between awareness in 2002 (through a White Paper pub- multiple computer sys-tems. lished by Autodesk [5]) The origination of the BIM The AICMA was founded in Paris in 1950, and abbreviation is attributed to Jerry Laiserin [6]. was renamed AECMA (Association européenne Gobesz F.-Zs. – Műszaki Tudományos Közlemények 12. (2020) 43 des constructeurs de matériel aérospatial) in 1973. tive was to develop standards and technologies In 1977, a data exchange format was proposed by that would enable product data to be controlled this association to allow cooperating companies and exchanged across various computing sys- to communicate surface geometries. Although tems. This group focused on two main projects, applied in some cases, it has been forgotten over which resulted in IGES and PDES (Product Data time [8]. Exchange Specification)[9] . In the 1970s, the ANSI (American National Stan- In Germany, in 1982, the Automobile Manu-fac- dards Institute) “X3 / SPARC” committee began ex- turers Association developed the VDA-FS (Verband ploring how data could be described, regardless der Automobilindustrie – Flachenschnittstelle) of the application or computer technology used. format for curves and surfaces of any shape to This committee proposed a three-schema meth- increase the efficiency and applicability of CAD odology whereby different views (conceptual, / CAM systems in design processes [8]. Thus, Ger- internal and external) of the same information many has also contributed to the standardization could be applied using a variety of filters by users of international product data models. on different computer technologies [8]. Also in 1982, ideas for the development of com- Based on the ANSI / X3 / SPARC methodology, the puter-aided construction tools were launched in US Air Force has developed an information mod- Finland, as such, in 1983 RACAD (Finnish abbrevi- eling process as a result of the “Integrated Com- ation of the “Computer Aided Design Construction puter Aided Manufacturing” (ICAM) pro-gram. Council”) and VTT (Finnish abbreviation of the ICAM's goal was to develop new manufacturing “Technical Research Center”) published a study automation technologies that could reduce over- on integrated computer aided design [10]. As a all procurement costs. ICAM and sub-sequent result of the somewhat parallel activities of these projects, including the “Product Definition Data two organizations, the RATAS (Finnish abbrevia- Interface” (PDDI) and the “Geometric Modeling tion of “Computer Assisted Design of Buildings”) Application” (GMAP) projects, have greatly con- project was conducted between 1985 and 1991. tributed to the development of tools and proce- Its proposals were related to the data transfer dures that have been incorporated into later stan- format structures, according to which there could dards. be used any data structures within the applica- The CAM-I (Computer-Aided Manufacturing - tions provided that suitable filtering programs International Inc.) organization contributed sig- are given for digital data exchange. A rule-based nificantly to the development of B-REP (Bound- knowledge description language and a generic ary Representation) data structures through a data model framework have also been developed. geometric modeling project started in the early 1970s. The result of the work funded by CAM-I, The proposal for a standard concerning product which was basically a mathematical represen- data transfer assumed one-by-one handling of the tation of standard geometry and topology, was objects and suggested the use of a programming well ahead of its time because it clearly contained language with syntax similar to LISP [10]. more information than the CAD systems of that The French SET (Standard d'Echange et de Trans- time could interpret. The CAM-I specification fo- fer) project was launched in 1983 within Aérospa- cused on the essential description of interchange- tial [8]. It has been developed to address IGES ap- able data, disregarding the exchange mechanism. plication problems, primarily for the automotive This description has been submitted to the “ANSI and aerospace production industries. SET reflect- Y 14.26” (Computer Aided Preparation of Product ed the requirements for data exchange between Definition Data) committee [8]. In 1980, NBS (Na- different CAD and CAM systems and the demands tional Bureau of Standards) published the “NBSIR for digital data storage. 80-1978” standard for digital representation of By 1984, all these international efforts had yield- product data specification for communications, ed so many comparable results that the possibili- which was approved as the first version of ANSI ty of developing a common solution for CAD data IGES (Initial Graphics Exchange Specification), as exchange emerged. The main driving forces for a neutral data block format that controls digital this common international standard were[8]: data exchange between different CAD systems. – global trade and data exchange; In the late 1970s, a group was formed in the – increasingly complex products; United States under the joint control of the in- – multipurpose software (for example, design dustry, government and universities. Its objec- or engineering software systems that could be 44 Gobesz F.-Zs. – Műszaki Tudományos Közlemények 12. (2020) used across multiple industries and various ac- 1998 a more advanced mark-up language named tivities); XML (eXtensible Markup Language). The spread – trust in suppliers at all stages of product devel- and use of this new language led to several ap- opment; plications, also in the field of construction, such – the need for product life-cycle support. as aecXML (Architecture, Engineering and Con- Many felt that IGES could not meet these needs. struction XML), started by Bentley Systems and As a result of international results, the first “Prod- then developed by the IAI for the construction uct Data Exchange Specification” (PDES) was re- industry. The “eConstruct” project (IST-1999- leased in the United States in July 1984, followed 10303) was launched in Europe in the late 1990s. by a second version in November. These were Within this framework, bcXML (Building and later merged with the STEP (STandard for the Construction XML) was developed, which be- Exchange of Product model data) specification came a taxonomy and lexicon based system [13]. developed by the
Recommended publications
  • Programming Parameterised Geometric Objects in a Visual Design Language
    PROGRAMMING PARAMETERISED GEOMETRIC OBJECTS IN A VISUAL DESIGN LANGUAGE by Omid Banyasad Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia June 2006 © Copyright by Omid Banyasad, 2006 ii DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY DATE: June 12, 2006 AUTHOR: Omid Banyasad TITLE: PROGRAMMING PARAMETERISED GEOMETRIC OBJECTS IN A VISUAL DESIGN LANGUAGE DEPARTMENT OR SCHOOL: Faculty of Computer Science DEGREE: PhD CONVOCATION: October YEAR: 2006 Permission is herewith granted to Dalhousie University to circulate and to have copied for non-commercial purposes, at its discretion, the above title upon the request of individuals or institutions. Signature of Author The author reserves other publication rights, and neither the thesis nor extensive extracts from it may be printed or otherwise reproduced without the author’s written permission. The author attests that permission has been obtained for the use of any copyrighted material appearing in the thesis (other than the brief excerpts requiring only proper acknowledgment in scholarly writing), and that all such use is clearly acknowledged. iii Table of Contents List of Tables . .ix List Of Figures . x Abstract . xii List of Abbreviations Used . .xiii Acknowledgments . .xiv CHAPTER 1: Introduction . 1 1.1 Design Tools . 3 1.1.1 Computer-Aided Design . 3 1.1.2 Mechanical Design Versus Digital Design . 5 1.2 Design Languages . 5 1.3 Background . 7 1.4 Research Objectives . 9 1.5 Organisation . 13 CHAPTER 2: Solids in Logic . 14 2.1 Lograph Syntax and Semantics . 15 2.2 LSD . 21 2.3 Relating Lograph to LSD . 27 2.4 Design Synthesis .
    [Show full text]
  • Download CMS Intellicad® Brochure
    CMS IntelliCAD® Premium Edition (PE) & Premium Edition Plus (PE Plus) CAD Software Affordable, Powerful & Compatible Key Points CMS IntelliCAD® Compatible CAD Software is the Unrivaled Autodesk® AutoCAD® Compatibility intelligent and affordable full-featured choice for Native .dwg file support, including version 2.5- 2018/20 engineers, architects and consultants, or anyone who Add Digital signaturesNEW to .dwg files. communicates using CAD drawings. AutoCAD 3D surface commands. CMS IntelliCAD is designed to give you unrivaled Spatial® ACIS (.sat) 3D solids import and export*. compatibility with Autodesk® AutoCAD®, and is fully ACIS 3D solids modeling*. programmable with hundreds of third party solutions. Autodesk Development System (ADS) unicode support. CMS IntelliCAD also offers a full suite of 2D and 3D LISP support (including .DCL). AutoCAD compatible drawing tools. CMS IntelliCAD also Support for AutoCAD command line. provides a high degree of compatibility with the AutoCAD Digitizer Support. command set, as well as AutoLISP and ADS and built-in AutoCAD menu (.MNU) and script (.SCR) files. Microsoft VBA. Raster image display. You can get to work immediately using your *.dwg files, commands and applications you rely on. Exceptional Productivity & Customization Photo-realistic 3-D rendering, Visual Styles & Materials. What's new on v10.0 Advanced photo-realistic rendering with Artisan render. Ribbon tabs interface combined with Menus & Toolbars. CMS IntelliCAD® 10 CAD Software is a major release CUI support for Ribbon tabs interface customization. providing new features and improvements , now also ActiveX support including in-place editing. provided as Perpetual Standalone and Network versions. Drawing Explorer™ for managing layers, blocks, line types, and Free 15 days trial available.
    [Show full text]
  • The Leader in Advanced .Dwg Technology
    October 17 2017 TEIGHA® DRAWINGS The leader in advanced .dwg technology www.opendesign.com Copyright © 2017 Open Design Alliance, All Rights Reserved BACKGROUND Teigha Drawings is a stand-alone independent SDK available for developers working with the .dwg, .dxf, and .dgn file formats. It was developed by Open Design Alliance (ODA), a technology consortium that has been providing interoperability tools for the engineering software industry since 1998. BUSINESS OVERVIEW INTRODUCTION ODA has a long history of experience with the .dwg file format, dating back to 1998. Our software has kept the .dwg file format open and universally accessible for the past 20 years. Today, in addition to providing interopera- bility, we are leveraging our vast experience with .dwg to make it a tool of choice for modern application development. INDUSTRY-PROVEN TECHNOLOGY Teigha Drawings has been powering thousands of mission critical engi- neering applications for more than a decade. It is a mature, high-quality and trusted solution for building CAD applications. ACCELERATE TIME-TO-MARKET In addition to turn-key support for .dwg and .dgn files, Teigha Drawings includes components for a variety of other common engineering tasks including version control, visualization and publishing. Using Teigha Drawings as a base, you can build more sophisticated applications in less time, using fewer resources. ATTRACTIVE LICENSING Teigha Drawings is offered under a fixed fee license with no royalties for cost-effective deployment. PRODUCT PORTFOLIO SUPPORTED FILE VERSIONS .dwg/.dxf
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to the Bricsys Newsletter
    Bricsys Newsletter Q1 - 2013 Welcome to the Bricsys Newsletter Our goal is to make this a quarterly newsletter The road to BIM: Bricsys is committed to explore the limits of Bricsys Strategy for Mechanical Design: Bricsys’ answers to the to provide you with what can be done for BIM within the familiar dwg environment. different MCAD challenges with 3D direct modeling in BricsCAD. interesting news about the CAD market in general as well as the BricsCAD platform and the solutions from our Third Party development partners. The Bricsys Team The BricsCAD re-branding Artisan for BricsCAD, 2012 International The World’s Oldest CAD and miscellaneous creating realistic images Conference summarized by Operator uses BricsCAD. click to © 2013 by Bricsys updates. from BricsCAD models. the CAD analyst community. navigate ! Bricsys Newsletter AECQ1 CORNER - 2013 The road to BIM By Erik de Keyser Over the last several years Bricsys evolved from an alternative CAD provider In a BIM all AEC disciplines add their specific info to the model in order to: to a leader in bringing about the next generation dwg environment unifying deliver a digital representation of the complete building as conceived, 2D drawing and 3D direct modeling. While there still are many challenges including all the technical disciplines needed for making the building ahead on the road to deliver top-notch solutions for the mechanical market, operational when physically constructed (design phase) we are now ready for our next challenge in the AEC space. hand-over this digital information to the contractors for construction of Several of us at Bricsys have been involved with BIM in the past, developing the building, add information about modifications along the construction TriForma for MicroStation in the 90s and Architecturals for the dwg space in process and make the BIM “As Build” (construction phase) the 00s.
    [Show full text]
  • Professional SDK for Cloud-Based Engineering Applications
    August 25 2017 TEIGHA® CLOUD Professional SDK for Cloud-Based Engineering Applications www.opendesign.com Copyright © 2017 Open Design Alliance, All Rights Reserved BACKGROUND Teigha Cloud is a framework for developing CAD applications that run in the cloud and can be accessed via the Internet. It provides a high performance economical solution for viewing CAD models in a browser. However, it is more than just a visualization system—it also supports various types of editing and general client-server application development. BUSINESS OVERVIEW INTRODUCTION Teigha Cloud is developed by Open Design Alliance, a technology consor- tium that has been providing mission critical components for the CAD industry since 1998. Web-based technologies are a part of most engineer- ing workflows today, and Teigha Cloud was developed as a solution for web-based visualization and application development. MODERN TOOLS Much of the Teigha Cloud client side is created by compiling existing Teigha C++ source code to JavaScript using Emscripten. The result is an efficient development process that intelligently leverages Teigha’s stable, mature C++ code base. COMPLEMENTARY APPROACH Unlike many cloud-based systems from other vendors, Teigha Cloud was developed to be compatible with existing Teigha technology. While the Teigha Cloud client is written in modern JavaScript, the server-side technol- ogy uses the same Teigha Kernel that is used on the desktop. INDUSTRY-PROVEN TECHNOLOGY Teigha Cloud inherits the experience and best practices of Teigha products that have been used for decades in mission critical roles across all engi- neering disciplines. ATTRACTIVE LICENSING Teigha Cloud is offered under a fixed fee license with no royalties for cost-effective deployment, including deployment of SaaS and other web-based applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper We Present an Early User Evaluation of a Advances in Sketch-Based Modeling Are Set to Simplify Many Sketch-Based 3D Modeling Tool We Have Been Developing [7,8]
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Computers & Graphics 31 (2007) 580–597 www.elsevier.com/locate/cag Calligraphic Interfaces An evaluation of user experience with a sketch-based 3D modeling system Levent Burak KaraÃ, Kenji Shimada, Sarah D. Marmalefsky Mechanical Engineering Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA Abstract With the availability of pen-enabled digital hardware, sketch-based 3D modeling is becoming an increasingly attractive alternative to traditional methods in many design environments. To date, a variety of methodologies and implemented systems have been proposed that all seek to make sketching the primary interaction method for 3D geometric modeling. While many of these methods are promising, a general lack of end user evaluations makes it difficult to assess and improve upon these methods. Based on our ongoing work, we present the usage and a user evaluation of a sketch-based 3D modeling tool we have been developing for industrial styling design. The study investigates the usability of our techniques in the hands of non-experts by gauging (1) the speed with which users can comprehend and adopt to constituent modeling steps, and (2) how effectively users can utilize the newly learned skills to design 3D models. Our observations and users’ feedback indicate that overall users could learn the investigated techniques relatively easily and put them in use immediately. However, users pointed out several usability and technical issues such as difficulty in mode selection and lack of sophisticated surface modeling tools as some of the key limitations of the current system. We believe the lessons learned from this study can be used in the development of more powerful and satisfying sketch-based modeling tools in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Repository for Design 1997 2
    Compriler-Aided Design. Vol. 29, No. 12. pp. 895-905, 1997 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd Printed in Great Britain PII: SOOlO-4485(97)00028.6 0010.4485/97/$17.00+0.00 Research Report A repository for design, process planning and assembly William C Regli*t and Daniel M Gaines* for collaboration, allowing, researchers to post challenge This paper provides an introduction to the Design, Planning and problems to a wide audience, share results, or perform Assembly Repository available through the National Institute of larger-scale experiments requiring bigger data sets with Standards and Technology (NIST). The goal of the Repository is to industrially relevant data. It is our belief that establishment provide a publically accessible collection of 2D and 3D CAD and of this Internet-enabled communal library will hasten solid models from industry problems. In this way, research and advances in solid modeling and application areas such as development efforts can obtain and share examples, focus on manufacturing process planning, feature recognition, and benchmarks, and identify areas of research need. The Repository is assembly planning. available through the World Wide Web at URL http : / / The paper is organized as follows: Section 2 overviews www.parts.nist.gov/parts. Publishedby Elsevierkience the current status and content of the Repository, describing Ltd the manufacturing domains it covers and giving a number of examples. Section 3 discusses research issues that either Keywords: solid modeling, CAD, feature recognition, feature- emerged during development and population of the based manufacturing, manufacturing process planning, Repository and outlines some of the new problems which assembly planning can be addressed based on the Repository’s contents.
    [Show full text]
  • BIM Tools and Parametric Modeling
    CHAPTER2 BIM Tools and Parametric Modeling 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This chapter provides an overview of the primary technology that distinguishes BIM design applications from other CAD systems. Object - based parametric modeling was originally developed in the 1980s. It does not represent objects with fi xed geometry and properties. Rather, it represents objects by parame- ters and rules that determine the geometry as well as some non - geometric properties and features. The parameters and rules allow the objects to auto- matically update according to user control or changing contexts. In other industries, companies use parametric modeling to develop their own object representations and to refl ect corporate knowledge and best practices. In architecture, BIM software companies have pre- defi ned a set of base building object families for users, which may be extended, modifi ed, or added to. An object family allows for the creation of any number of object instances, with forms that are dependent on parameters and relationships with other objects. Companies should have the capability of developing user - defi ned parametric objects and corporate object libraries for customized quality control and to establish their own best practices. Custom parametric objects allow for the modeling of complex geometries, which were previously not possible or simply impractical. Object attributes are needed to interface with analyses, cost estimations, and other applications, but these attributes must fi rst be defi ned by the fi rm or user. Current BIM tools vary in many ways: in the sophistication of their prede- fi ned base objects; in the ease with which users can defi ne new object families; BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building InformationModeling for Owners, Managers,Designers, Engineers, and Contractors.
    [Show full text]
  • D2.1-BIM-Models V2.Pdf
    03-2019 BIMy D2.1 v1.01 BIMy Project: D2.1 BIM Model Document metadata Date 2021-03-23 Status Draft Version 2.01 Authors Hashmat Wahid – Willemen Dieter Froyen – Willemen Lise Bibert - Willemen Stijn Goedertier – GIM Steven Smolders - GIM Stijn Van Thienen – GeoIT Elena Pajares – Assar Architects Thomas Goossens – Assar Architects Niki Cauberg – BBRI François Robberts – BBRI Jens Lathouwers – Geo-IT Erick Vasquez - LetsBuild Coordinator Franky Declercq – GeoIT Reviewed by Thomas Goossens – Assar Architects Jens Lathouwers – Geo-IT Version history Version Date Author Change 0.01 2019-04-09 SGO Introduction and scope 0.02 2019-05-03 EPA Overview of model data used 0.03 2019-05-14 SGO/SS Stability of object identifiers through time and scale 0.04 2019-06-04 HWA Modelling conventions to filter by time & IFC use 0.05 2019-06-05 SVT Scope: Parameters within Revit, Methodology: fire parameters 0.06 2019-06-06 HWA 0.07 2019-06-07 SGO Modelling time and scale: notes from the workshop 0.08 2019-06-19 SVT, TGO Modelling fire 0.09 2019-06-20 HWA Modelling time and scale 0.10 2019-09-23 HWA,LBI Document structure, modelling geometry, information, time & scale, export & filtering 0.11 2019-11-27 HWA,LBI How to model Circular Economy data 1.01 2019-12-19 TGO Reviewed – Submitted to ITEA 1 | P a g e 03-2019 BIMy D2.1 v1.01 1.02 2020-09-21 JLA Checking in native software, Path of travel functionality (Revit) 2.0 2021-03-22 All Final review 2.01 2021-03-23 JLA Reviewed – Submitted to ITEA 2 | P a g e 03-2019 BIMy D2.1 v1.01 Table of Contents Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • HCI Remixed : Essays on Works That Have Influenced the HCI
    4 Drawing on SketchPad: Refl ections on Computer Science and HCI Joseph A. Konstan University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, U.S.A. I. Sutherland, 1963: “Sketchpad: A Man–Machine Graphical Communication System” Sutherland’s SketchPad system, paper, and dissertation provide, for me, the answer to the oft-asked question: “why should HCI belong in a computer science program?” I fi rst came across the paper “SketchPad: A Man–Machine Graphical Communica- tion System” from the 1963 AFIPS conference nearly thirty years after it had been published (Sutherland 1963). I was nearing completion of my own dissertation in which I was exploring a variety of techniques for constructing user interface toolkits. At the time, the paper seemed little more than a handy reference in which I could trace the lineage of constraint programming in user interfaces—from Sketchpad, through Borning’s ThingLab (Borning 1981), to my own work, with various hops and detours along the way. I guess I was young and in a hurry. It was only a few years later when I started to teach this material that I realized how much of today’s computing traces its roots to Sutherland’s work. What was this tremendous paper about? A drawing program. Not just any drawing program, but one that took full advantage of computing, a million-pixel display (albeit with a slow pixel-by-pixel refresh), a light pen, and various buttons and dials to empower users to draw and repeat patterns, to integrate constraints with draw- ings so as to better understand mechanical systems, and to draw circuit diagrams as input to simulators.
    [Show full text]
  • BIM in the Real World
    product spotlight BIMin the RealEDITED BY GEOFF WEISENWorldBERGER Revit Structure appears to be leading the pack in terms of building information modeling software, and some of its users share their thoughts. Alexander Baumel James A. Corsiglia Will F. Ikerd II Tom Bartolomucci Justin Den Herder Randy Karl Hagens Atul Khanzode ALLOW ME TO REPeat A statement THat HAS BEEN latter program weigh in on its pros and cons, its interoper- MADE AD NAUSEAM: BIM IS HERE TO staY. ability with other packages, and BIM use in general. Does this mean that all structural engineering firms are using building information modeling on all projects? Cer- Is Revit Structure/BIM in regular use at your firm? tainly not. But a survey conducted in 2008 by the Structural Bartolomucci: We have already implemented and used Revit Engineering Institute’s BIM Committee, in collaboration with Structure for about two years on many projects. Revit has the Structural Engineers Association of Texas’ IT Committee, been used on a majority of structural projects and several indicates that more than half of structural engineering firms at least have BIM software at their offices. Further, approximately architectural projects. We are attempting to use Revit on all 65% of the respondents said that they think they will have to projects as scope and budgets allow. use BIM to meet client needs within the next two years; almost 80% said within the next five years. (The survey was sent to Khanzode: Revit/BIM is in regular use at DPR, and we are using more than 15,000 SEI members and received more than 700 it on about 70 total projects across the company.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1: Introduction
    Chapter 1: Introduction 1.1 Preface In response to the fast growth in construction industries worldwide, design and construction firms, and professionals in Architecture, Engineering and Construction (ACE) sector, have great challenges to adopt more efficient and effective building tools to achieve client’s satisfaction by providing accurate and easier information and data more than traditional assembled 2D. Since 1992 the term of Building Information Building( BIM) appeared and started using widely as concept for digital representation of the physical and functional characteristics of a building displayed as a 3D model, with the added capability to integrate a whole array of design, and the term is changing from one developer to another such as Virtual Building by GraphiSoft and Integrated Project Models by Bentley Systems. According to The National Building Information Model Standard (NBIMS), Building Information Modeling (BIM) is a digital representation of physical and functional characteristics of a facility. A BIM is a shared knowledge resource for information about a facility forming a reliable basis for decisions during its life-cycle.In 2004, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) published a report stating that poor interoperability and data management costs the construction industry approximately $15.8 billion a year, or approximately 3 -4% of the total industry .A basic premise of BIM is collaboration by different stakeholders at different phases of the life cycle of a facility to insert, extract, update or modify information in the BIM process to support and reflect the roles of that stakeholder (Suremann, 2009) Addition to that, new dimension elements have been added to 3D concept such as 4D for time and 5D for cost to enhance the capability for life cycle management.
    [Show full text]