DOCSLIB.ORG

Ryan Niblock, Senior Planner Re

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SAN JOAQUIN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS 555 E. Weber Avenue • Stockton, California 95202 209.235.0600 • 209.235.0438 (fax) www.sjcog.org Date: August 15, 2019 Robert Rickman To: Interagency Consultation Partners and Public CHAIR Doug Kuehne From: Ryan Niblock, Senior Planner VICE CHAIR Andrew T. Chesley Re: Availability of SJCOG Draft 2018 RTP Amendment #2 (Type 4 Rely on EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Previous Emissions Analysis) and Corresponding Draft Conformity Analysis for Interagency Consultation and Public Review Member Agencies CITIES OF ESCALON, The San Joaquin Council of Governments is proposing a formal amendment (Type LATHROP, LODI, #4: Rely on a previous emissions analysis) to the federally approved 2018 Regional MANTECA, Transportation Plan. No amendment is necessary to the 2019 FTIP. Associated RIPON, documentation is attached as indicated below. STOCKTON, TRACY, AND RTP Amendment #2: Attachment 1 includes a summary of programming THE COUNTY OF changes to the 2018 RTP/SCS. This amendment deals primarily with open- SAN JOAQUIN to-traffic date updates, without crossing air quality horizon years. Minor adjustments to project costs do not impact project scope for any project, and keep the RTP fiscally constrained. An Environmental Impact Report Supplement is not necessary as the project changes remain consistent with the 2018 RTP/SCS EIR. Conformity Requirements: 2018 RTP Amendment #2 relies on the previous emissions analysis for the 2018 RTP Amendment #1, as there are no project scope changes, and because open-to-traffic date changes do not cross air quality horizon years. The 2018 RTP Amendment #1 Conformity Analysis contains the documentation to support a finding that the 2018 RTP/SCS continues to meet the air quality conformity requirements for carbon monoxide, ozone and particulate matter (Attachment 2). In addition, the projects and/or phases do not interfere with the timely implementation of any approved Transportation Control Measures. Public Involvement: Attachment 3 includes the Draft Public Notice and Adoption Resolution. A concurrent 30-day comment period for RTP Amendment #2 and the corresponding conformity document will commence on August 16, 2019 and conclude on September 16, 2019. A public meeting will be held on September 17, 2019 at 2:00pm. Public comments are welcome at the meeting, or may be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on September 16. The draft documents are available for review at the SJCOG office, located at 555 E. Weber Avenue, Stockton, CA 95202 and on the SJCOG website at http://www.sjcog.org. SAN JOAQUIN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS 555 E. Weber Avenue • Stockton, California 95202 209.235.0600 • 209.235.0438 (fax) www.sjcog.org Date: August 15, 2019 Doug Kuehne To: Interagency Consultation Partners and Public CHAIR Jesus Andrade From: Ryan Niblock, Senior Planner VICE CHAIR Andrew T. Chesley Re: Availability of SJCOG Draft 2018 RTP Amendment #2 (Type 4 Rely on EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Previous Emissions Analysis) and Corresponding Draft Conformity Analysis for Interagency Consultation and Public Review Member Agencies CITIES OF ESCALON, The San Joaquin Council of Governments is proposing a formal amendment (Type LATHROP, LODI, #4: Rely on a previous emissions analysis) to the federally approved 2018 Regional MANTECA, Transportation Plan. No amendment is necessary to the 2019 FTIP. Associated RIPON, documentation is attached as indicated below. STOCKTON, TRACY, AND RTP Amendment #2: Attachment 1 includes a summary of programming THE COUNTY OF changes to the 2018 RTP/SCS. This amendment deals primarily with open- SAN JOAQUIN to-traffic date updates, without crossing air quality horizon years. Minor adjustments to project costs do not impact project scope for any project, and keep the RTP fiscally constrained. An Environmental Impact Report Supplement is not necessary as the project changes remain consistent with the 2018 RTP/SCS EIR. Conformity Requirements: 2018 RTP Amendment #2 relies on the previous emissions analysis for the 2018 RTP Amendment #1, as there are no project scope changes, and because open-to-traffic date changes do not cross air quality horizon years. The 2018 RTP Amendment #1 Conformity Analysis contains the documentation to support a finding that the 2018 RTP/SCS continues to meet the air quality conformity requirements for carbon monoxide, ozone and particulate matter (Attachment 2). In addition, the projects and/or phases do not interfere with the timely implementation of any approved Transportation Control Measures. Public Involvement: Attachment 3 includes the Draft Public Notice and Adoption Resolution. A concurrent 30-day comment period for RTP Amendment #2 and the corresponding conformity document will commence on August 16, 2019 and conclude on September 16, 2019. A public meeting will be held on September 17, 2019 at 2:00pm. Public comments are welcome at the meeting, or may be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on September 16. The draft documents are available for review at the SJCOG office, located at 555 E. Weber Avenue, Stockton, CA 95202 and on the SJCOG website at http://www.sjcog.org. The San Joaquin Council of Governments Board of Directors will consider the adoption of the Draft 2018 RTP Amendment #2 and Draft Corresponding Conformity Analysis on September 26, 2019 at 4:00pm or shortly thereafter. The meeting will be at the address noted above. In conclusion, the 2018 RTP Amendment #2 and Draft Corresponding Conformity Analysis meet all applicable transportation planning requirements per 23 CFR Part 450, 40 CFR Part 93, and conform to the applicable SIPs. If you have any questions or would like to submit comments, please contact Ryan Niblock by phone at 209-235-0600 or by email at [email protected]. ATTACHMENT 1: RTP Amendment #2 2018 RTP Amendment #2 Summary of Changes The RTP as amended conforms to the applicable State Implementation Plans (SIPs), meets all applicable transportation planning requirements per 23 CFR Part 450, and meets the transportation conformity regulations. These changes require a formal RTP amendment (new regional emissions analysis). These changes are necessary to change the schedule for the projects listed below. There is no impact to the 2018 RTP fiscal constraint. Tables 6‐1, 6‐2, 6‐3, and 6‐6 have been updated accordingly. 2018 RTP Amendment #2 makes the following open‐to‐traffic date and project cost changes in the 2018 RTP: RTP Jurisdiction Facility Project Description Project Limits Total Project Open to ID Name/Route Cost Traffic I‐205 HOV Alameda County SJ07‐ Managed Widen from 6 to 8 lanes Line to Eleventh 2026 1003 Caltrans Lanes (inside/outside) Street $95,874,000 2028 I‐205 HOV Eleventh Street SJ14‐ Managed Widen from 6 to 8 lanes to MacArthur 2026 1001 Caltrans Lanes (inside/outside) Drive $102,000,000 2028 I‐205 HOV SJ14‐ Managed Widen from 6 to 8 lanes MacArthur Drive 2026 1002 Caltrans Lanes (inside/outside) to I‐5 $100,000,000 2028 I‐580 at International I‐580 at SJ14‐ Pkwy/Patterso Mountain 2022 2002 Tracy n Pass Road Reconstruct interchange House Parkway $17,200,000 2023 I‐205 at Mountain I‐205 at SJ14‐ House/Interna Mountain 2022 2003 Tracy tional Pkwy Reconstruct interchange House Parkway $16,100,000 2023 SJ11‐ I‐205 at Grant Modification of existing I‐205 at Grant 2024 2011 Tracy Line Road interchange Line Road $32,574,820 2026 Widen from 2 to 4 lanes, including reconstruction of Delta‐Mendota Canal SJ18‐ International and California Aqueduct 2022 3002 Tracy Parkway bridges I‐205 to I‐580 $35,000,000 2023 Caltrans Intercity Rail In Stockton, Construct Passenger track connections and Facility grade separate the BNSF Stockton Stockton Subdivision and Diamond UPRR Fresno Subdivision Intersection of SJ11‐ Grade diamond crossing the BNSF and 2024 6001 SJRRC Separation UP railroads. $19,622,477 2025 Table 6-1: 2018 Regional Transportation Plan Project List - Mainline Highway Improvements Category t n te c u g D io o je I at s l ro O /R min P m e er ar va ffic l P r iv e am o t Y r ra M # fo on am el e g pr wa ec rs P In ti N D p T e oj T ID t ic y o on ro A to n r fie R S c d it t t P e P ti 8 O je l A n IP N ris cil st ta les IP P en R IF e 01 T P ro u a o o i T E p K T Id 2 C P P J F Project Description Project Limits C T M F N O M R (Widen the eastbound SR 120 to southbound SR 99 connector ramp from one-lane to two-lanes; Remove the Austin Road overcrossing and replace with a new 4 lane structure spanning SR 99 and UPRR; Add a new connecting road from Austin Road to Woodward Ave and Moffat Blvd and modify the existing UPRR gated crossing at Woodward Ave;Temporarily close the Austin SR 99/120 Road northbound entrance and On SR-120 from Main Street (P.M. 5.13) to SR- Connector Project southbound exit ramps, resulting in a 99 and on SR-99 from SR-120 to Olive Avenue SJ14-1004 112-0000-0421 Caltrans Phase 1A partial interchange.) (P.M. 6.22) $52,419,765 2015 2019 2023 X X I-205 Managed Widen from 6 to 8 lanes SJ07-1003 Caltrans Lanes (inside/outside) Alameda County Line to Eleventh Street $95,874,000 2022 2028 X I-205 Managed Widen from 6 to 8 lanes SJ14-1001 Caltrans Lanes (inside/outside) Eleventh Street to MacArthur Drive $102,000,000 2022 2028 X X I-205 Managed Widen from 6 to 8 lanes SJ14-1002 Caltrans Lanes (inside/outside) MacArthur Drive to I-5 $100,000,000 2022 2028 X Widen to add HOV lanes with HOV Connector Ramps to I-205 and SR- SJ07-1008 Caltrans I-5 HOV Mossdale 120 I-205 to Louise Avenue (P.M.
Recommended publications
  • SAN JOAQUIN COUNCIL of GOVERNMENTS MANAGEMENT and FINANCE COMMITTEE MANTECA TRANSIT CENTER 220 Moffat Blvd., Manteca, CA 95336

    SAN JOAQUIN COUNCIL of GOVERNMENTS MANAGEMENT and FINANCE COMMITTEE MANTECA TRANSIT CENTER 220 Moffat Blvd., Manteca, CA 95336

    P1 SAN JOAQUIN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS MANAGEMENT AND FINANCE COMMITTEE MANTECA TRANSIT CENTER 220 Moffat Blvd., Manteca, CA 95336 HOSTED BY: SAN JOAQUIN REGIONAL TRANSIT DISTRICT Wednesday, August 21, 2019 Noon The San Joaquin Council of Governments is in compliance with the American with Disabilities Act and will make all reasonable accommodations for the disabled to participate in employment, programs and facilities. Persons requiring assistance or auxiliary aid in order to participate should contact Rebecca Calija at (209) 235-0600 at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. A G E N D A 1. Call to Order and Self Introductions 2. Public Comments 3. Approve Minutes of June 19, 2019 Action 4. Local Transportation Fund Policy Action 5. Non Emergency Medical Transportation Annual Review Action 6. Valley Link Project Feasibility Report Discussion 7. Federal Transit Urbanized Area (UZA) Programming for Manteca Action and Tracy 8. Executive Director’s Report 9. Other Matters of Business 10. Adjourn to next regular scheduled meeting of Management and Finance Committee Wednesday, September 18, 2019. Chair: Steve Schwabauer Vice: Laurie Montes City of Lodi City of Stockton P2 AGENDA ITEM 3 P3 SAN JOAQUIN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS MANAGEMENT AND FINANCE COMMITTEE Meeting held at Manteca Transit Center 220 Moffat Blvd., Manteca, CA 95336 June 20, 2019 M I N U T E S 1. The meeting was called to order at 12:00 p.m. by Chair Schnaider. Attendance and Roll Call: Tammy Alcantor, Escalon City Manager; Monica Nino, County Administrator; Stephen Salvatore, Lathrop
  • ACE Train Time Schedule & Line Route

    ACE Train Time Schedule & Line Route

    ACE train time schedule & line map San Jose View In Website Mode The ACE train line (San Jose) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) San Jose: 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM (2) Stockton: 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest ACE train station near you and ƒnd out when is the next ACE train arriving. Direction: San Jose ACE train Time Schedule 10 stops San Jose Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Stockton Station 949 Channel St, Stockton Tuesday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Lathrop/Manteca Station Wednesday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Tracy Station Thursday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Friday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Vasco Road Station South Vasco Road, Livermore Saturday Not Operational Livermore Station Pleasanton Station 403 Old Bernal Av, Pleasanton ACE train Info Direction: San Jose Fremont Station Stops: 10 37275 Fremont Bl, Fremont Trip Duration: 132 min Line Summary: Stockton Station, Lathrop/Manteca Great America Station Station, Tracy Station, Vasco Road Station, West Tasman Drive, Santa Clara Livermore Station, Pleasanton Station, Fremont Station, Great America Station, Santa Clara Station, Santa Clara Station San Jose Station Railroad Avenue, Santa Clara San Jose Station Direction: Stockton ACE train Time Schedule 10 stops Stockton Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM San Jose Station Tuesday 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM Santa Clara Station Railroad Avenue, Santa Clara Wednesday 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM Great America Station Thursday 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM
  • Altamont Corridor Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor Altamontaltamont Corridor Corridor Vision: Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor

    Altamont Corridor Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor Altamontaltamont Corridor Corridor Vision: Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor

    Altamont Corridor Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor AltamontAltamont Corridor Corridor Vision: Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor What is the Altamont Corridor Vision? The Altamont Corridor that connects the San Joaquin Valley to the Bay Area is one of the most heavily traveled, most congested, and fastest growing corridors in the Northern California megaregion. The Bay Area Council estimates that congestion will increase an additional 75% between 2016 and 2040. To achieve state and regional environmental and economic development goals, a robust alternative is needed to provide a sustainable / reliable travel choice and greater connectivity. The Altamont Corridor Vision is a long-term vision to establish a universal rail corridor connecting the San Joaquin Valley and the Tri-Valley to San Jose, Oakland, San Francisco and the Peninsula. This Vision complements other similar investments being planned for Caltrain, which is in the process of electrifying its corridor and rolling stock; Capitol Corridor, which is moving its operations to the Coast Subdivision as it improves its service frequency and separates freight from passenger service; a new Transbay Crossing, which would allow for passenger trains to flow from Oakland to San Francisco; the Dumbarton Rail Crossing, which is being studied to be brought back into service; and Valley Rail, which will connect Merced and Sacramento. The Vision also complements and connects with High- Speed Rail (HSR), and would enable a one-seat ride from the initial operating segment in the San Joaquin Valley throughout the Northern California Megaregion. One-Hour One-Seat One Shared Travel Time Ride Corridor Shared facilities, Oakland, Stockton, Express service, integrated Peninsula, Modesto modern rolling ticketing, San Jose stock timed connections • The limited stop (two intermediate stops) travel time between Stockton and San Jose is estimated to be 60 minutes.
  • California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16

    California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16

    California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16 December 2005 California Department of Transportation ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor SUNNE WRIGHT McPEAK, Secretary Business, Transportation and Housing Agency WILL KEMPTON, Director California Department of Transportation JOSEPH TAVAGLIONE, Chair STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER JEREMIAH F. HALLISEY, Vice Chair GOVERNOR BOB BALGENORTH MARIAN BERGESON JOHN CHALKER JAMES C. GHIELMETTI ALLEN M. LAWRENCE R. K. LINDSEY ESTEBAN E. TORRES SENATOR TOM TORLAKSON, Ex Officio ASSEMBLYMEMBER JENNY OROPEZA, Ex Officio JOHN BARNA, Executive Director CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1120 N STREET, MS-52 P. 0 . BOX 942873 SACRAMENTO, 94273-0001 FAX(916)653-2134 (916) 654-4245 http://www.catc.ca.gov December 29, 2005 Honorable Alan Lowenthal, Chairman Senate Transportation and Housing Committee State Capitol, Room 2209 Sacramento, CA 95814 Honorable Jenny Oropeza, Chair Assembly Transportation Committee 1020 N Street, Room 112 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear: Senator Lowenthal Assembly Member Oropeza: On behalf of the California Transportation Commission, I am transmitting to the Legislature the 10-year California State Rail Plan for FY 2005-06 through FY 2015-16 by the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) with the Commission's resolution (#G-05-11) giving advice and consent, as required by Section 14036 of the Government Code. The ten-year plan provides Caltrans' vision for intercity rail service. Caltrans'l0-year plan goals are to provide intercity rail as an alternative mode of transportation, promote congestion relief, improve air quality, better fuel efficiency, and improved land use practices. This year's Plan includes: standards for meeting those goals; sets priorities for increased revenues, increased capacity, reduced running times; and cost effectiveness.
  • 1.7.3 Project Environmental Impact Report

    1.7.3 Project Environmental Impact Report

    Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Introduction The Tri-Valley–San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority (Authority) is proposing the Valley Link Project, which is being evaluated on a project level in this Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR). This chapter provides a brief overview of the Proposed Project and alternatives; the Project goals and objectives; Project background and context; an overview of the environmental review process; and the scope, content, and organization of the Draft EIR. Figure 1-1. Valley Link Project Geographic Segments 1.2 Project Overview 1.2.1 Proposed Project The Proposed Project is a new 42-mile, 7-station passenger rail project that will connect the existing Dublin/Pleasanton Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Station in Alameda County to the approved Altamont Corridor Express (ACE) North Lathrop Station in San Joaquin County (Figure 1-1). Valley Link will use existing transportation corridors: the existing Interstate (I-) 580 corridor (11.7 miles) in the Tri-Valley; the Alameda County Transportation Corridor right-of-way (ROW) through the Altamont Pass (14.5 miles); and the existing Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) Corridor (16.1 miles) in Northern San Joaquin County. The Proposed Project includes the following stations: ⚫ Dublin/Pleasanton (BART Intermodal) Valley Link Draft EIR 1-1 December 2020 ICF 00004.19 Tri-Valley – San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority Introduction ⚫ Isabel (Livermore) ⚫ Greenville (Livermore) ⚫ Mountain House (San Joaquin County) ⚫ Downtown Tracy Station (Tracy) ⚫ River Islands Station (Lathrop) ⚫ North Lathrop Station (ACE Intermodal) The Proposed Project also includes the proposed Tracy Operation and Maintenance Facility (OMF), which would be located in the City of Tracy.
  • 2-5-21 SJRRC Agenda Packet

    2-5-21 SJRRC Agenda Packet

    Chair, Christina Fugazi, City of Stockton Commissioner, Nancy Young, City of Tracy Vice Chair, Leo Zuber, City of Ripon Commissioner, Kathy Miller, San Joaquin County Commissioner, Jose Nuno, City of Manteca Commissioner, Melissa Hernandez, Alameda County Commissioner, Lily Mei, City of Fremont Commissioner, Mikey Hothi, City of Lodi Executive Director, Stacey Mortensen SAN JOAQUIN REGIONAL RAIL COMMISSION TELECONFERENCE BOARD MEETING February 5, 2021 – 8:00 am Call-In Information: +1 (571) 317-3122 Access Code: 314-618-965 GoToMeeting Link: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/314618965 SPECIAL NOTICE Coronavirus COVID-19 In accordance with the Governor’s Executive Order N-29-20, San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission Board Members will be attending this meeting via teleconference or videoconference. Members of the public may observe the meeting by dialing +1 (571) 317- 3122 with access code: 314-618-965 or log-in using a computer, tablet or smartphone at GoToMeeting.com using link: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/314618965 Please note that all members of the public will be placed on mute until such times allow for public comments to be made. If a person wishes to make a public comment during the meeting, to do so they must either 1) use GoToMeeting and will have the option to notify SJRRC staff by alerting them via the “Chat” function or they can 2) contact SJRRC staff via email at [email protected] in which staff will read the comment aloud during the public comment period. Emailed public comments should be limited to approximately 240 words as comments will be limited to two (2) minutes per comment.
  • SJRRC February 2021 Board Packet

    SJRRC February 2021 Board Packet

    Chair, Christina Fugazi, City of Stockton Commissioner, Nancy Young, City of Tracy Vice Chair, Leo Zuber, City of Ripon Commissioner, Kathy Miller, San Joaquin County Commissioner, Jose Nuno, City of Manteca Commissioner, Melissa Hernandez, Alameda County Commissioner, Lily Mei, City of Fremont Commissioner, Mikey Hothi, City of Lodi Executive Director, Stacey Mortensen SAN JOAQUIN REGIONAL RAIL COMMISSION TELECONFERENCE BOARD MEETING February 5, 2021 – 8:00 am Call-In Information: +1 (571) 317-3122 Access Code: 314-618-965 GoToMeeting Link: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/314618965 SPECIAL NOTICE Coronavirus COVID-19 In accordance with the Governor’s Executive Order N-29-20, San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission Board Members will be attending this meeting via teleconference or videoconference. Members of the public may observe the meeting by dialing +1 (571) 317- 3122 with access code: 314-618-965 or log-in using a computer, tablet or smartphone at GoToMeeting.com using link: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/314618965 Please note that all members of the public will be placed on mute until such times allow for public comments to be made. If a person wishes to make a public comment during the meeting, to do so they must either 1) use GoToMeeting and will have the option to notify SJRRC staff by alerting them via the “Chat” function or they can 2) contact SJRRC staff via email at [email protected] in which staff will read the comment aloud during the public comment period. Emailed public comments should be limited to approximately 240 words as comments will be limited to two (2) minutes per comment.
  • Agenda Shall Be Made Available Upon Request in Alternative Formats to Persons with a Disability, As Required by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C

    Agenda Shall Be Made Available Upon Request in Alternative Formats to Persons with a Disability, As Required by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C

    Chair, Christina Fugazi, City of Stockton Commissioner, Nancy Young, City of Tracy Vice Chair, Leo Zuber, City of Ripon Commissioner, Bob Elliott, San Joaquin County Commissioner, Debby Moorhead, City of Manteca Commissioner, Scott Haggerty, Alameda County Commissioner, John Marchand, City of Livermore Commissioner, Doug Kuehne, City of Lodi Executive Director, Stacey Mortensen SAN JOAQUIN REGIONAL RAIL COMMISSION TELECONFERENCE BOARD MEETING Call-In Information: 1 (408) 650-3123 Conference Access Code: 322-881-829 GoToMeeting Link: https://www.gotomeet.me/acerail/sjrrc-board-meeting-may SPECIAL NOTICE Coronavirus COVID-19 In accordance with the Governor’s Executive Order N-29-20, San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission Board Members will be attending this meeting via teleconference. Members of the public may observe the meeting by dialing 1 (408) 650-3123 with access code: 322-881-829 or log-in using a computer, tablet or smartphone at GoToMeeting.com using link: https://www.gotomeet.me/acerail/sjrrc-board-meeting-may. Please note that all members of the public will be placed on mute until such times allow for public comments to be made. If a person wishes to make a public comment during the meeting, to do so they must either 1) use GoToMeeting and will have the option to notify SJRRC staff by alerting them via the “Chat” function or they can 2) contact SJRRC staff via email at [email protected] in which staff will read the comment aloud during the public comment period. Public comments will be limited to two (2) minutes per comment. This Agenda shall be made available upon request in alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C.
  • ACE Ceres–Merced Extension Project PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD: THURSDAY, APRIL 22, 2021 – MONDAY, JUNE 7, 2021 DATE: April 22, 2021

    ACE Ceres–Merced Extension Project PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD: THURSDAY, APRIL 22, 2021 – MONDAY, JUNE 7, 2021 DATE: April 22, 2021

    NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF A DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ACE Ceres–Merced Extension Project PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD: THURSDAY, APRIL 22, 2021 – MONDAY, JUNE 7, 2021 DATE: April 22, 2021 TO: Agencies, Organizations, and Interested Parties FROM: San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission SUBJECT: Notice of Availability of a Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR) for the ACE Ceres- Merced Extension Project (SCH #2018012014) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission (SJRRC), acting as lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), has prepared a Draft EIR for the Altamont Corridor Express (ACE) Ceres–Merced Extension Project (Project). A. Project Description SJRRC proposes to extend ACE passenger rail service along approximately 34-miles from Ceres to Merced. The Proposed Project would include the development of the following facilities. • The Ceres to Merced Extension Alignment, which consists of upgrades to track, new track, and bridges within the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) Fresno Subdivision between Ceres and Merced.1 • The Turlock, Livingston, and Merced Stations, which are located along the Ceres to Merced Extension Alignment. • The Merced Layover & Maintenance Facility, which is located in north Merced to support extension operations. Project Alignment, Stations, and Layover & Maintenance Facility Ceres to Merced Extension Alignment The proposed extension to Merced would construct a combination of track upgrades and new track, which would result in a second mainline on the UPRR Fresno Subdivision between Ceres and Merced. These proposed track upgrades and new track for the Ceres to Merced Extension Alignment would be located east or west of the existing mainline track. Approximately 26 miles of new mainline track will be installed as part of the Project and will be located between existing sidings, which will also be upgraded.
  • 3.17 Transportation and Traffic

    3.17 Transportation and Traffic

    Environmental Impact Analysis Tri-Valley – San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority Transportation and Traffic 3.17 Transportation and Traffic 3.17.1 Introduction This section describes the regulatory setting and environmental setting for transportation and traffic in the vicinity of the Proposed Project (including all track variants, technology variants, and the Greenville and Mountain House initial operating segments [IOS]) and the alternatives analyzed at an equal level of detail (Southfront Road Station Alternative, Stone Cut Alignment Alternative, West Tracy Operation and Maintenance Facility [OMF] Alternative, Mountain House Station Alternative, and Downtown Tracy Station Parking Alternatives 1 and 2). It also describes the impacts on transportation and traffic that would result and mitigation measures that would reduce significant impacts, where feasible. There would be no differences in the physical impacts related to hydrology and water quality due to the diesel multiple unit (DMU), hybrid battery multiple unit (HBMU), battery-electric multiple unit (BEMU), or diesel locomotive haul (DLH) technology variants, so the discussion in this section does not discuss those variants. Potential impacts associated with implementation of the Proposed Project and the alternatives analyzed at an equal level of detail assume the larger environmental footprint at proposed and alternative stations associated with a potential IOS (i.e., Greenville IOS, Mountain House IOS, Southfront Road Station Alternative IOS, and Mountain House Alternative IOS) and/or the expanded parking in 2040. As such, the analysis of the Proposed Project and the alternatives analyzed at an equal level of detail below considers the potential impacts associated with a potential IOS and/or the expanded parking in 2040.
  • Chapter [Click Here and Type Chapter Number]

    Chapter [Click Here and Type Chapter Number]

    U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Railroad Administration Record of Decision Bay Area to Central Valley High-Speed Train 1. Introduction The California High-Speed Rail Authority (Authority) and the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), an operating administration of the U.S. Department of Transportation, prepared a joint programmatic environmental impact report/environmental impact statement (EIR/EIS) to evaluate a broad corridor between the Bay Area and Central Valley for the California High-Speed Train (HST) system (Program EIR/EIS herein discussed). As a joint document, the EIR/EIS was prepared in compliance with both the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The Authority is the state lead agency for purposes of compliance with CEQA and the FRA is the lead Federal agency for purposes of compliance with NEPA. In November 2005, the Authority and FRA approved the statewide HST system program for intercity travel in California between the major metropolitan centers of Sacramento and the San Francisco Bay Area in the north, through the Central Valley, to Los Angeles and San Diego in the south. The system, proposed by the Authority, is about 800-miles long, with electric propulsion and steel-wheel-on-steel-rail trains capable of maximum operating speeds 220 miles per hour (mph) (354 kilometers per hour [kph]) on a mostly dedicated system of fully grade-separated, access-controlled steel tracks and with state- of-the-art safety, signaling, communication, and automated train control systems. As part of the November 2005 decision on the statewide HST system, the Authority and FRA selected, for further project-level study and implementation planning, a series of alignments and station locations for the HST system.
  • Work Program & Budget FY21 22

    Work Program & Budget FY21 22

    BREAKING NEW GROUND FY21/22 Breaking New Ground on Valley Rail, Work Program and Budget Ridership Recovery, and Beyond. ® TABLE OF CONTENTS ® Executive Summary............................3 Organizational Chart.........................13 Operations.........................................4 ACE Operating Budget.....................14 Customer Engagement......................6 SJJPA Operating Budget .................15 Capital Projects..................................8 Capital Budget.................................16 Planning...........................................11 THE SAN JOAQUIN REGIONAL RAIL COMMISSION BOARD OF DIRECTORS Christina Fugazi Jose Nuño Melissa Hernandez Chair, City of Stockton Commissioner, City of Manteca Commissioner, City of Dublin Leo Zuber Nancy Young Lily Mei Vice Chair, City of Ripon Commissioner, City of Tracy Commissioner, City of Fremont Kathy Miller Mike Hothi Commissioner, San Joaquin County Commissioner, City of Lodi Stacey Mortensen Executive Director 2020/2021: Work Program and Budget 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY With the State of California readying to re-open all facets of Breaking New Ground in the Safety programs means incor- the economy on June 15, 2021, the Rail Commission is ready porating the ongoing sanitizing and distance protocols to to respond with concerted efforts toward rail service recovery keep passengers safe during various high-virus seasons that and restoration. Ridership on both the ACE and San Joaquins may be encountered in the future, as well as, seeking more services has been steadily increasing and the new fiscal year technology-based approaches to reducing trespassers in the brings a much-needed sense of optimism and opportunity. rail corridors and incidents at grade crossings. In terms of accessibility, it means moving beyond typical train fare and This past year, the agency navigated the many uncertainties marketing programs and digging into the issue of making surrounding the pandemic and continued to provide essen- the trains more available from a means-based perspective.