DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 2 Project Description

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 2 Project Description 1 Chapter 2 2 Project Description 3 The Altamont Corridor Express (ACE) Ceres–Merced Extension (Project) would support the 4 extension of ACE service to Merced. The Proposed Project is the extension of ACE service from Ceres 5 to Merced and includes the development of the following facilities. 6 ⚫ The Ceres to Merced Extension Alignment, which consists of upgrades to track, new track, and 7 bridges within the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) Fresno Subdivision between Ceres and 8 Merced.1 9 ⚫ New Turlock, Livingston, and Merced Stations, which are located along the Ceres to Merced 10 Extension Alignment. 11 ⚫ The Merced Layover & Maintenance Facility, which is located in north Merced to support 12 extension operations. 13 In addition, the San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission (SJRRC) has identified the Atwater Station 14 Alternative as an alternative to the Livingston Station. Only one station would be implemented in 15 either Livingston or Atwater. This EIR analyzes both stations at an equal level of detail. The final 16 decision as to whether to adopt the Proposed Project and/or an alternative will be made after 17 completion of the final environmental impact report (EIR) for this Project. This chapter provides 18 information regarding operations and maintenance activities, construction activities, potential right- 19 of-way (ROW) and easement needs, costs and funding sources, and required permits and approvals. 20 2.1 Project Location and Limits 21 As shown in Figure 2-1, the limits of the Project span Stanislaus and Merced Counties. SJRRC proposes 22 to extend ACE passenger rail service from Ceres to Merced by constructing and upgrading tracks 23 within the existing UPRR Fresno Subdivision ROW, a distance of approximately 34 miles. New stations 24 and operating facilities would be constructed along the Ceres to Merced Extension Alignment. Project 25 improvements include portions of the UPRR Fresno Subdivision ROW and additional ROW for new 26 facilities (stations and layover yards) and for any construction or access areas located outside the 27 ROW. 28 2.2 Background 29 SJRRC does not own the tracks on which ACE operates, but instead has entered into passenger rights 30 agreements with both the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (PCJPB, also referred to as 31 Caltrain) and UPRR to operate on portions of their respective tracks. ACE shares tracks with freight 32 trains dispatched by UPRR within the UPRR ROW and with freight trains dispatched by Caltrain in 33 the Caltrain corridor. In addition, other passenger train services (Caltrain, Amtrak Coast Starlight, 34 and Capitol Corridor) also operate on PCJPB and UPRR tracks where ACE trains travel. 1 A subdivision is a portion of railroad or railway that operates under a single timetable (authority for train movement in the area). ACE Ceres–Merced Extension Draft EIR 2-1 April 2021 ICF 00144.20 4 5 dd 99 NORTH LATHROP STATION SAN JOAQUIN CO LEGEND S Lathrop DOWNTOWN County Boundaries Manteca MANTECA STATION Escalon EXISTING LATHROP/MANTECA STATION Urban Areas 120 S Water 120 205 Major Roads Oakdale Railroads S RIPON STATION Existing ACE Route a Ripon S n 108 J o Existing Station Tracy a q 5 u in R S iv Proposed Project e Salida TRACY STATION r Proposed Ceres-Merced Extension 99 Modesto S Proposed Stations MODESTO STATION S Potential Stations S 132 (one will be selected) 580 Merced Layover & Maintenance Facility S CERES STATION Ceres ACE Lathrop-Ceres Extension (CEQA STANISLAUS CO Keyes completed, construction scheduled) Lathrop-Ceres Extension S Lathrop-Ceres Extension Stations 33 5 Turlock S TURLOCK STATION 0 5 10 Existing ACE Route Miles Stockton 26 STOCKTON STATION S Walnut 4 5 24 Creek 4 99 CONTRA COSTA CO SAN JOAQUIN CO LATHROP/MANTECA STATION Delhi MERCED CO Oakland Lathrop Manteca 680 S 120 580 205 120 Oakdale VASCO ROAD STATION 580 Tracy Ripon 108 LIVINGSTON STATION 5 S 580 Pleasanton S S 99 S Livermore 59 S 580 TRACY STATION Modesto Livingston 880 LIVERMORE STATION 132 92 Union PLEASANTON STATION Atwater City Ceres Keys S FREMONT STATION 33 5 ATWATER STATION S Fremont ALAMEDA CO Turlock 165 84 STANISLAUS CO 99 ) AB Newman 680 SANTA CLARA CO Merced 82 101 Delhi MERCED CO 2/12/21 237 S GREAT AMERICA STATION ( 140 S 280 Santa SANTA CLARA STATION Livingston 59 Clara S Atwater MERCED STATION S SAN JOSE DIRIDON STATION 165 00144.20 Merced 85 San Jose 10 Miles 140 99 17 101 Graphics Figure 2-1 Project Location ACE0 Ceres-Merced5 Extension10 Project15 20 1 Inch = 6.31 Miles Scale 1:400,000 San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission Project Description 1 To enhance commuter and intercity rail service and to promote greater transit connectivity between 2 the San Joaquin Valley and the San Francisco Bay Area (Bay Area), SJRRC is proposing to expand ACE 3 service. On August 3, 2018, the SJRRC Board of Commissioners approved the ACE Extension Lathrop 4 to Ceres/Merced EIR (Prior EIR) for Phase I of the extension, which includes the extension of ACE to 5 Ceres with stations in downtown Manteca, Ripon, Modesto, and Ceres. The Prior EIR included a 6 programmatic analysis for Phase II of the extension, which includes the extension of ACE from Ceres 7 to Merced with stations in Turlock, Livingston or Atwater, and Merced. This EIR updates the 8 programmatic analysis previously analyzed for the ACE Extension Ceres to Merced (i.e., Phase II) 9 and includes project-level details that were not previously available. 10 2.3 Proposed Alignment, Stations, and Layover & 11 Maintenance Facility 12 ACE currently does not operate passenger rail services between Ceres and Merced and is proposing 13 to extend passenger rail service from Ceres to Merced on the UPRR Fresno Subdivision. No facilities 14 are proposed as part of the Project between Ceres and Lathrop, though facilities are being pursued 15 as part of a separate previously approved project. Additionally, no facilities are proposed as part of 16 the Project along the existing ACE corridor between Stockton and San Jose. However, where 17 applicable, this EIR analyzes operations impacts of the Project due to increased ridership at existing 18 ACE destination stations in the Bay Area. 19 Specific proposed track improvements, stations, and the layover & maintenance facility are 20 illustrated in Figures 2-1 through 2-7. The environmental footprint is illustrated in Appendix B, ACE 21 Ceres-Merced Extension Environmental Footprint.2 In addition, Appendix C, ACE Ceres-Merced 22 Extension 15% Preliminary Engineering Plans, contains track plans and section drawings, structure 23 plans, roadway plans, utility plans, station plans, and ROW plans for these improvements. 24 The analysis in this EIR would allow subsequent implementation of individual facilities, and 25 prioritization and phasing of facilities. Infrastructure improvements and passenger service can be 26 increased in a phased approach over time. Thus, the development of physical improvements and 27 implementation of ACE service could be phased in over time, as follows. 28 ⚫ Initial improvements: Construction of stations, parking, and key track/infrastructure 29 improvements and commencement of initial service (one or more trains). 30 ⚫ Interim improvements: Construction of additional track improvements, such as the additional 31 new mainline track, at specific areas of train congestion, and possibly additional parking 32 improvements necessary because of increased ridership, which would allow further expansion 33 of service beyond the initial service or expansion. 34 ⚫ Full build: Completion of all proposed improvements and implementation of the full service 35 plans. 36 2 The footprint is defined as the area covered by a facility or affected by construction activities. ACE Ceres–Merced Extension Draft EIR 2-3 April 2021 ICF 00144.20 ne River Tuolum Stockton Subdivision to Lathrop LEGEND E Hatch Rd New Second Mainline Track, Upgrade Existing Track to Second Mainline Track, Shifted Track CERES New Track (CEQA completed, construction scheduled) Station New Mainline Track At-Grade Crossing Modication Tidewater Industrial Lead Industrial Tidewater (CEQA completed, Undercrossing Modication construction scheduled) Extended Culvert Structure B E Whitmore Ave New Bridge Structure Mitchell Rd 0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 Feet Ceres Station S (CEQA completed, MP 117.38 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Miles construction scheduled) Roeding Rd Faith Home RdFaith E Service Rd Fresno Subdivision Central Ave MP 118.72 ( Ceres Main Canal) Ceres Main Canal Ceres MP 119.55 (Irrigation Canal) KEYES 99 E Keyes Rd E Keyes Rd MP 121.21 (East Keyes Rd) N Walnut N Walnut Rd N View Rd Mountain MP 122.21 (West Taylor Rd) C MP 122.22 (Irrigation Canal) E Taylor Rd MP 122.59 (SR99) to Merced Graphics... 00144.20 (4/2/21) AB Graphics... 00144.20 (4/2/21) W Monte Vista Ave MP 123.60 (West Monte Vista Ave) E Monte Vista Ave Fresno Subdivision Figure 2-2a Ceres to Merced Extension Alignment TURLOCKACE Ceres-Merced Extension Project MP 124.27 (West Tuolumne Road) E Tuolumne Road Turlock Station (See Figure 2-3) N Mountain View NView Rd Mountain Sperry Rd MP 122.21 (West Taylor Rd) MP 122.22 (Irrigation Canal) E Taylor Rd MP 122.59 (SR99) to Lathrop LEGEND New Second Mainline Track, Upgrade Existing Track to Second Mainline Track, Shifted Track W Monte Vista Ave MP 123.60 (West Monte Vista Ave) E Monte Vista Ave Station Fresno Subdivision At-Grade Crossing Modication TURLOCK Undercrossing Modication Extended Culvert Structure E Tuolumne Road MP 124.27 (West Tuolumne Road) B New Bridge Structure Universal Crossover Turlock Station (See Figure
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Climate Adaptation Report
    Caltrans CCAP: District Interviews Summary October 2019 San Joaquin Council of Governments Climate Adaptation & Resiliency Study Climate Adaptation Report APRIL 2, 2020 1 Climate Adaptation Report March 2020 Contents Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................. 7 Vulnerability Assessment: Key Findings ...................................................................................................... 10 Gaps and Recommendations ...................................................................................................................... 16 Integrating Transportation Resilience into the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP).............................. 17 Next Steps ................................................................................................................................................... 18 Appendix A: Detailed Vulnerability Assessment Report ............................................................................. 20 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • SAN JOAQUIN COUNCIL of GOVERNMENTS MANAGEMENT and FINANCE COMMITTEE MANTECA TRANSIT CENTER 220 Moffat Blvd., Manteca, CA 95336
    P1 SAN JOAQUIN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS MANAGEMENT AND FINANCE COMMITTEE MANTECA TRANSIT CENTER 220 Moffat Blvd., Manteca, CA 95336 HOSTED BY: SAN JOAQUIN REGIONAL TRANSIT DISTRICT Wednesday, August 21, 2019 Noon The San Joaquin Council of Governments is in compliance with the American with Disabilities Act and will make all reasonable accommodations for the disabled to participate in employment, programs and facilities. Persons requiring assistance or auxiliary aid in order to participate should contact Rebecca Calija at (209) 235-0600 at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. A G E N D A 1. Call to Order and Self Introductions 2. Public Comments 3. Approve Minutes of June 19, 2019 Action 4. Local Transportation Fund Policy Action 5. Non Emergency Medical Transportation Annual Review Action 6. Valley Link Project Feasibility Report Discussion 7. Federal Transit Urbanized Area (UZA) Programming for Manteca Action and Tracy 8. Executive Director’s Report 9. Other Matters of Business 10. Adjourn to next regular scheduled meeting of Management and Finance Committee Wednesday, September 18, 2019. Chair: Steve Schwabauer Vice: Laurie Montes City of Lodi City of Stockton P2 AGENDA ITEM 3 P3 SAN JOAQUIN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS MANAGEMENT AND FINANCE COMMITTEE Meeting held at Manteca Transit Center 220 Moffat Blvd., Manteca, CA 95336 June 20, 2019 M I N U T E S 1. The meeting was called to order at 12:00 p.m. by Chair Schnaider. Attendance and Roll Call: Tammy Alcantor, Escalon City Manager; Monica Nino, County Administrator; Stephen Salvatore, Lathrop
    [Show full text]
  • ACE Train Time Schedule & Line Route
    ACE train time schedule & line map San Jose View In Website Mode The ACE train line (San Jose) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) San Jose: 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM (2) Stockton: 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest ACE train station near you and ƒnd out when is the next ACE train arriving. Direction: San Jose ACE train Time Schedule 10 stops San Jose Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Stockton Station 949 Channel St, Stockton Tuesday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Lathrop/Manteca Station Wednesday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Tracy Station Thursday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Friday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Vasco Road Station South Vasco Road, Livermore Saturday Not Operational Livermore Station Pleasanton Station 403 Old Bernal Av, Pleasanton ACE train Info Direction: San Jose Fremont Station Stops: 10 37275 Fremont Bl, Fremont Trip Duration: 132 min Line Summary: Stockton Station, Lathrop/Manteca Great America Station Station, Tracy Station, Vasco Road Station, West Tasman Drive, Santa Clara Livermore Station, Pleasanton Station, Fremont Station, Great America Station, Santa Clara Station, Santa Clara Station San Jose Station Railroad Avenue, Santa Clara San Jose Station Direction: Stockton ACE train Time Schedule 10 stops Stockton Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM San Jose Station Tuesday 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM Santa Clara Station Railroad Avenue, Santa Clara Wednesday 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM Great America Station Thursday 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM
    [Show full text]
  • Altamont Corridor Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor Altamontaltamont Corridor Corridor Vision: Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor
    Altamont Corridor Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor AltamontAltamont Corridor Corridor Vision: Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor What is the Altamont Corridor Vision? The Altamont Corridor that connects the San Joaquin Valley to the Bay Area is one of the most heavily traveled, most congested, and fastest growing corridors in the Northern California megaregion. The Bay Area Council estimates that congestion will increase an additional 75% between 2016 and 2040. To achieve state and regional environmental and economic development goals, a robust alternative is needed to provide a sustainable / reliable travel choice and greater connectivity. The Altamont Corridor Vision is a long-term vision to establish a universal rail corridor connecting the San Joaquin Valley and the Tri-Valley to San Jose, Oakland, San Francisco and the Peninsula. This Vision complements other similar investments being planned for Caltrain, which is in the process of electrifying its corridor and rolling stock; Capitol Corridor, which is moving its operations to the Coast Subdivision as it improves its service frequency and separates freight from passenger service; a new Transbay Crossing, which would allow for passenger trains to flow from Oakland to San Francisco; the Dumbarton Rail Crossing, which is being studied to be brought back into service; and Valley Rail, which will connect Merced and Sacramento. The Vision also complements and connects with High- Speed Rail (HSR), and would enable a one-seat ride from the initial operating segment in the San Joaquin Valley throughout the Northern California Megaregion. One-Hour One-Seat One Shared Travel Time Ride Corridor Shared facilities, Oakland, Stockton, Express service, integrated Peninsula, Modesto modern rolling ticketing, San Jose stock timed connections • The limited stop (two intermediate stops) travel time between Stockton and San Jose is estimated to be 60 minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16
    California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16 December 2005 California Department of Transportation ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor SUNNE WRIGHT McPEAK, Secretary Business, Transportation and Housing Agency WILL KEMPTON, Director California Department of Transportation JOSEPH TAVAGLIONE, Chair STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER JEREMIAH F. HALLISEY, Vice Chair GOVERNOR BOB BALGENORTH MARIAN BERGESON JOHN CHALKER JAMES C. GHIELMETTI ALLEN M. LAWRENCE R. K. LINDSEY ESTEBAN E. TORRES SENATOR TOM TORLAKSON, Ex Officio ASSEMBLYMEMBER JENNY OROPEZA, Ex Officio JOHN BARNA, Executive Director CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1120 N STREET, MS-52 P. 0 . BOX 942873 SACRAMENTO, 94273-0001 FAX(916)653-2134 (916) 654-4245 http://www.catc.ca.gov December 29, 2005 Honorable Alan Lowenthal, Chairman Senate Transportation and Housing Committee State Capitol, Room 2209 Sacramento, CA 95814 Honorable Jenny Oropeza, Chair Assembly Transportation Committee 1020 N Street, Room 112 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear: Senator Lowenthal Assembly Member Oropeza: On behalf of the California Transportation Commission, I am transmitting to the Legislature the 10-year California State Rail Plan for FY 2005-06 through FY 2015-16 by the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) with the Commission's resolution (#G-05-11) giving advice and consent, as required by Section 14036 of the Government Code. The ten-year plan provides Caltrans' vision for intercity rail service. Caltrans'l0-year plan goals are to provide intercity rail as an alternative mode of transportation, promote congestion relief, improve air quality, better fuel efficiency, and improved land use practices. This year's Plan includes: standards for meeting those goals; sets priorities for increased revenues, increased capacity, reduced running times; and cost effectiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • Alameda I 680 Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plan
    Alameda I-680 Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plan 1 DocuSign Envelope ID: 68DB90D3-75C6-4545-BEE4-4EF3E608995F 6-1-2020 6/24/2020 DocuSign Envelope ID: 68DB90D3-75C6-4545-BEE4-4EF3E608995F Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................ i Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Caltrans Policy Development .............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Senate Bill 1 and the Solutions for Congested Corridors Program ..................................................... 1 1.3 Document Structure............................................................................................................................ 2 1.4 Stakeholders ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Chapter 2: Corridor Goals, Objectives and Performance Metrics ................................................................ 3 Chapter 3: Corridor Overview ....................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Corridor Limits .................................................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Route Significance ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Perseverance & Progress Work Program and Budget
    2020/2021 Work Program and Budget Perseverance & Progress Built on solid ground, SJRRC will continue through this unprecedented crisis with vision and momentum. ® Table of Contents ® Executive Summary............................3 SJJPA..............................................11 ® Planning.............................................4 Organizational Chart.........................13 Operations.........................................6 Capital Budget.................................14 Stockton Diamond..............................8 ACE Operating Budget.....................15 Capital Projects..................................9 SJJPA Operating Budget .................16 The San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission Board of Directors Christina Fugazi Debby Moorhead Scott Haggerty Chair, City of Stockton Commissioner, City of Manteca Commissioner, Alameda County Leo Zuber Nancy Young John Marchand Vice Chair, City of Ripon Commissioner, City of Tracy Commissioner, City of Livermore Bob Elliott Doug Kuehne Commissioner, San Joaquin County Commissioner, City of Lodi Stacey Mortensen Executive Director 2020/2021 Work Program and Budget 2 Executive Summary The San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission is built on a ing forward and provides much needed jobs for many private solid foundation of political leadership, staff commitment planners, engineers, architects, and construction contractors. and adaptability. The difficult years of the 1998 ACE start- The Valley Rail Program will continue to press forward in the up, the 2003 dot.com implosion, and the 2009 full recession coming year with multiple environmental processes to keep have prepared the agency to deal with the unknowns of the the entire Program on-track and set to deliver transforma- coming year. Staff is prepared to work with less, cover extra tional service expansion for both ACE and the San Joaquins. workload and find ways to leverage and share resources with Also, included in the Capital Program are key passenger other partners.
    [Show full text]
  • San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission Teleconference Board Meeting
    Chair, Christina Fugazi, City of Stockton Commissioner, Nancy Young, City of Tracy Vice Chair, Leo Zuber, City of Ripon Commissioner, Kathy Miller, San Joaquin County Commissioner, Jose Nuño, City of Manteca Commissioner, Melissa Hernandez, Alameda County Commissioner, Lily Mei, City of Fremont Commissioner, Mikey Hothi, City of Lodi Executive Director, Stacey Mortensen SAN JOAQUIN REGIONAL RAIL COMMISSION TELECONFERENCE BOARD MEETING June 4, 2021 – 8:00 am Call-In Information: +1 (646) 749-3122 Access Code: 185-391-325 GoToMeeting Link: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/185391325 SPECIAL NOTICE Coronavirus COVID-19 In accordance with the Governor’s Executive Order N-29-20, San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission Board Members will be attending this meeting via teleconference or videoconference. Members of the public may observe the meeting by dialing +1 (646) 749- 3122 with access code: 185-391-325 or log-in using a computer, tablet or smartphone at GoToMeeting.com using link: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/185391325 Please note that all members of the public will be placed on mute until such times allow for public comments to be made. If a person wishes to make a public comment during the meeting, to do so they must either 1) use GoToMeeting and will have the option to notify SJRRC staff by alerting them via the “Chat” function or they can 2) contact SJRRC staff via email at [email protected] in which staff will read the comment aloud during the public comment period. Emailed public comments should be limited to approximately 240 words as comments will be limited to two (2) minutes per comment.
    [Show full text]
  • West Contra Costa High-Capacity Transit Study
    West Contra Costa High-Capacity Transit Study FINAL TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #4 Summary and Evaluation of Prior Studies September 2015 West Contra Costa High-Capacity Transit Study Document Version Control Revision Updated By Organization Description of Revision Date Incorporate feedback from BART 8/14/2015 Doris Lee Parsons Brinckerhoff Board Member City of Richmond staff requested that South Richmond Transportation 8/20/2015 Doris Lee Parsons Brinckerhoff Connectivity Plan be included. Tech memo updated to note that this plan is covered in Section 2.15 Incorporated edits to address SMG 8/27/2015 Doris Lee Parsons Brinckerhoff and TAC feedback 9/16/15 Tam Tran Parsons Brinckerhoff Made minor edits related to tense Document Sign-off Name Date Signature Rebecca Kohlstrand 09/16/15 ii Draft Summary and Evaluation of Prior Studies September 2015 West Contra Costa High-Capacity Transit Study Table of Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 West Contra Costa County Transportation Setting ........................................... 1 1.2 Study Purpose .................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Purpose of this Technical Memorandum ........................................................... 3 2 Review OF Prior Studies .................................................................................... 4 2.1 BART West Contra Costa Extension Study, 1983 ...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Station Profiles
    2015 BART Station Profile Study Station Profiles – Non-Home Origins STATION PROFILES – NON-HOME ORIGINS This section contains a summary sheet for selected BART stations, based on data from customers who travel to the station from non-home origins, like work, school, etc. The selected stations listed below have a sample size of at least 200 non-home origin trips: • 12th St. / Oakland City Center • Glen Park • 16th St. Mission • Hayward • 19th St. / Oakland • Lake Merritt • 24th St. Mission • MacArthur • Ashby • Millbrae • Balboa Park • Montgomery St. • Civic Center / UN Plaza • North Berkeley • Coliseum • Oakland International Airport (OAK) • Concord • Powell St. • Daly City • Rockridge • Downtown Berkeley • San Bruno • Dublin / Pleasanton • San Francisco International Airport (SFO) • Embarcadero • San Leandro • Fremont • Walnut Creek • Fruitvale • West Dublin / Pleasanton Maps for these stations are contained in separate PDF files at www.bart.gov/stationprofile. The maps depict non-home origin points of customers who use each station, and the points are color coded by mode of access. The points are weighted to reflect average weekday ridership at the station. For example, an origin point with a weight of seven will appear on the map as seven points, scattered around the actual point of origin. Note that the number of trips may appear underrepresented in cases where multiple trips originate at the same location. The following summary sheets contain basic information about each station’s weekday non-home origin trips, such as: • absolute number of entries and estimated non-home origin entries • access mode share • trip origin types • customer demographics. Additionally, the total number of car and bicycle parking spaces at each station are included for context.
    [Show full text]
  • Megaregion Working Group Agenda
    MEGAREGION WORKING GROUP AGENDA Friday, June 25, 2021 12:30 PM – 2:30 PM SUPERVISOR ALFREDO PEDROZA, NAPA COUNTY Meeting location – (Vice-Chair) You are invited to a Zoom Meeting SUPERVISOR NATE Join from a PC, Mac, iPad, iPhone or Android device: MILEY, ALAMEDA COUNTY Please click this URL to join. https://sjcog.zoom.us/j/98750744809 SUPERVISOR JIM SPERING, SOLANO COUNTY Or Telephone: (669) 900-6833 MAYOR AMY Webinar ID: 987 5074 4809 WORTH, CITY OF ORINDA 1. Call to Order/ Roll Call of MegaRegion Members 2. Presentation - John Robert Smith, Transportation for America 3. Refresh of March Meeting; June Agenda Overview & Purpose– Diane Nguyen, SJCOG SUPERVISOR ROBERT Executive Director RICKMAN, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY (Chair) 4. Candidate Megaregion Capital Project Priorities—Discussion led by agency staff. VICE-MAYOR GARY SINGH, CITY OF MANTECA 5. Spotlight - Planning/Project Concept Priorities –Discussion led by Executive Directors. MAYOR NANCY YOUNG, CITY OF TRACY 6. Public Communications – anyone person wishing to address the megaregion working COUNCILMEMBER group on non-agendized items may do so at this time. Please use the “raise hand” LEO ZUBER, CITY OF RIPON feature (for video participants) or press *9 for phone participants. 7. Wrap up/next steps for September –Diane Nguyen, SJCOG Executive Director 8. Adjourn to next meeting at 12:30 p.m. to 2:30 p.m., September 24, 2021. SUPERVISOR BONNIE GORE, PLACER COUNTY MAYOR MIKE KOZLOWSKI, CITY OF FOLSOM COUNCILMEMBER LUCAS FRERICHS, CITY OF DAVIS SUPERVISOR DON SAYLOR, YOLO COUNTY 1 Agenda Item #3 Refresh of March Meeting 2 MEGAREGION GROUP APPROVED FRAMEWORK FOR MEGAREGION TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENT STRATEGY (Approved at March 26, 2021 meeting) Objective: To develop a set of “framing principles” that will guide potential shared interests in transportation investments among the megaregional partners.
    [Show full text]
  • San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission
    Chair, Christina Fugazi, City of Stockton Commissioner, Nancy Young, City of Tracy Vice Chair, Leo Zuber, City of Ripon Commissioner, Bob Elliott, San Joaquin County Commissioner, Bob Johnson, City of Lodi Commissioner, Scott Haggerty, Alameda County Commissioner, Debby Moorhead, City of Manteca Commissioner, John Marchand, City of Livermore Executive Director, Stacey Mortensen SAN JOAQUIN REGIONAL RAIL COMMISSION This Agenda shall be made available upon request in alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. § 12132) and the Ralph M. Brown Act (California Government Code § 54954.2). Persons requesting a disability related modification or accommodation in order to participate in the meeting should contact San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission (SJRRC) staff, at (209) 944-6220, during regular business hours, at least twenty-four hours prior to the time of the meeting. All proceedings before the Commission are conducted in English. Anyone wishing to address the SJRRC Board is advised to have an interpreter or to contact SJRRC during regular business hours at least 48 hours prior to the time of the meeting so that SJRRC can provide an interpreter. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on this agenda will be made available upon request in both English and Spanish for public inspection at the Office of the Executive Director located at 949 East Channel Street, Stockton, California, 95202 during normal business hours or by calling (209) 944-6220. The Agenda is available on the San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission website: www.acerail.com.
    [Show full text]