DOCSLIB.ORG

Hariyo Ban Program Livelihood Interventions Knowledge And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Submitted to Hariyo Ban Program WWF Nepal P.O. Box 7660, Baluwatar, Kathmandu Hariyo Ban Program Livelihood Interventions (FINAL REPORT) Knowledge and Learning Document 26 June 2019 39- Prachin Marga, Naya Baneshwor, Kathmandu, Nepal; Tel: +977 (1) 4463021; Fax: +977 (1) 4483427 Email: [email protected] Visit us at: www.narma.org.np Final report Hariyo Ban Program Knowledge and Learning Documentation of Livelihood Interventions 26 June 2019 NARMA Consultancy Private Limited 39- Prachin Marga, Naya Baneshwor, Kathmandu, Nepal P.O. Box 13536, Kathmandu Nepal Tel: +977 (1) 4463021 Fax: +977 (1) 4483427 Email: [email protected] Visit us at: www.narma.org.np Table of Contents ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................... I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .....................................................................................................II 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................ 1 1.2 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY ..................................................................................... 1 1.3 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY .............................................................................. 1 1.3.1 Study framework and areas of inquiry .................................................................. 1 1.3.2 Methodology ............................................................................................................. 2 1.4 COVERAGE ............................................................................................................. 4 1.5 LIMITATIONS ........................................................................................................... 4 1.6 STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT ................................................................................... 5 2. LIVELIHOOD INTERVENTIONS IN HARIYO BAN ...................................................... 6 2.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 6 2.2 THEORY OF CHANGE ............................................................................................... 6 2.3 TYPES OF ENTERPRISES SUPPORTED ....................................................................... 7 2.4 NATURE OF SUPPORT .............................................................................................. 7 3. KEY FINDINGS: LEARNINGS FROM THE LIVELIHOOD INTERVENTIONS ............. 9 3.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 9 3.2 LEARNINGS BY AREAS OF INQUIRY ........................................................................... 9 3.2.1 Appropriateness of interventions .......................................................................... 9 3.2.2 Inclusiveness and equity ...................................................................................... 13 3.2.3 Effectiveness of market-based intervention vis a vis equity-based model ..... 15 3.2.4 Market linkages including the involvement of the private sector ..................... 16 3.2.5 Collaboration, linkages and partnerships ............................................................. 18 3.2.6 Outcomes & effect of interventions ..................................................................... 21 3.2.7. Sustainability of interventions ............................................................................... 22 4. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................. 26 4.1 CONCLUSIONS ...................................................................................................... 26 4.1.1 Reduced threats to target species ....................................................................... 26 4.1.2 Market based livelihood alternatives developed and promoted ....................... 27 4.1.3 Community readiness to adapt and benefit from climate change increased .. 28 4.2 RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................. 28 LISTS OF DOCUMENTS CONSULTED .............................................................................. 30 ANNEXES .......................................................................................................................... 31 ANNEX 1: AREAS OF INQUIRY AND INDICATORS ............................................................. 32 ANNEX 2: LIST OF ENTERPRISES AND GRANTS STUDIED ................................................ 33 ANNEX 3: STUDY ENTERPRISES .................................................................................... 35 i Acronyms and Abbreviations ACA : Annapurna Conservation Area BZCFUG Buffer Zone Community Forestry User Group BZUC : Buffer Zone User Committee CARE : Cooperative for Assistance and Relief Everywhere DCPA : District Coffee Producers Association CF : Community Forestry CFUG : Community Forestry User Group CHAL : Chitwan Annapurna Landscape FECOFUN : Federation of Community Forestry Users in Nepal GoN : Government of Nepal HH : Households NCPA Nepal Coffee Producers Association NTNC : National Trust for Nature Conservation PS : Private Sector PWBR : Participatory Well Being Ranking RF : Revolving Fund RM : Rural Municipality SGP : Small Grants Program SBKI : Sagar Bee Keeping Industry TAL : Terai Arc Landscape WBR : Well Being Ranking WWF : World Wildlife Fund i Executive Summary Hariyo Ban phase two is a five year programme implemented in the Chitwan Annapurna Landscape (CHAL) and Tarai Arc Landscape (TAL) with the objectives of improving conservation and management of CHAL and TAL landscapes and by reducing climate change vulnerability in these landscapes. Livelihoods intervention or development of market based livelihood alternatives is an expected result under the biodiversity objective intended to contribute to this objective by raising the economic status of the beneficiaries and weaning them off of their dependency on forest. This study consisted of studying the commercial enterprises implemented as part of the livelihood interventions and review of relevant reports to document knowledge and learnings The overall objective of this task is to produce a valuable document on livelihoods interventions supported by the Hariyo Ban Program with strong ownership of the partners and stakeholders. A study framework was developed and applied to guide the steps of a participatory and reiterative methodology that focused on the processes initiated to determine and implement the interventions, inputs applied, intended as well as unintended outcomes achieved and the lessons learnt therein. The study adopted an inductive inquiry method, where semi-structured questionnaires were administered in the form of Focused Group Discussion (FGD) and semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders. The FGDs and KI interviews were guided by the seven areas of inquiry: Appropriateness of interventions (relevance to Hariyo Ban goal) Inclusiveness and equity Effectiveness of market based model vis a vis equity based Market linkages and involvement of private sector Collaboration, linkages and partnerships Outcomes/effects of intervention Sustainability of interventions Out of a total of 59 enterprises implemented, 16 enterprises under regular program and 2 enterprise supported under Small Grant Projects (SGP) were studied. The enterprises studied included 9 small, 5 medium and 2 large enterprises as per the definition of Hariyo Ban. This included 7, 4, 3 and 2 enterprises implemented by WWF, NTNC, FECOFUN and CARE Nepal respectively. The SGP were implemented by WWF engaging Sagar Bee Keeping Industry and Organic Valley Private Ltd. The enterprises were situated in Banke and Kanchanpur Districts of TAL landscape and Kaski, Tanahu, Chitwan and Nawalparasi Districts of TAL landscape. All the interventions or enterprises were implemented through NRM based oragnisations such as the CFUGs and BZFUGs located adjacent to biodiversity hot spots like Panchase Protected Forest, Chitwan National Park and Shuklaphanta National Park. As a result, majority of beneficiaries and participants of the enterprises were from poor and forest dependent households (HHs) among which most were women, including women from dalit, ex Kamaiya and ethnic minorities. Hariyo Ban support to these enterprises were in the form of financial support through grant and establishment of a revolving fund. Technical support was provided for skills development and operation and management capacity building in the form of trainings (on site and off site) and learning visits to relevant ongoing projects/activities elsewhere. Support modality also included material inputs such as seedlings, manure, tools and equipment. Some of the key findings from this study are that due to a parallel development of increased income from the implementation of the enterprises, improved transportation system in the rural ii areas and increased availability of LPG and biogas access and affordability to use LPG and biogas, dependency of the peoples on forest resources has decreased. Likewise, increased planting of fodder trees and grasses in and around own farm as well as in leased land has also drastically reduced the need for these beneficiaries to depend on forest for livestock. The study revealed that by providing alternative livelihood opportunities
Recommended publications
  • Voice of Senior Citizens, Dec. Issue

    Voice of Senior Citizens, Dec. Issue

    AGEING IN NEPALI PRESS (Nov. 1-30, 2015) ADVOCACY Participated in the Campaign Ageing Nepal Kathmandu, November, 2015 Ageing Nepal participated in the Global Climate March Campaign to mark the COP21 of 29th November. On 29th November the leaders and head of the state of more than 190 countries came together for climate talks in Paris. The world took part in the Global Climate March, calling on leaders to use the opportunity of the UN climate talks in Paris to accelerate progress in the fight against climate change. Ageing Nepal organized various supportive campaign activities like: TV Talk show, Radio Talk show, article publication on the importance of COP21, workshop, petition handover to the government authorities and so on before 29th Nov. Similarly in the major event of the 29th Nov. various activities were conducted in different districts. The following table presents campaign activities and related districts. S.N. Activities Districts 1. Rallies Elephant Horse Cart Chitwan Rickshaw Older Person Jhapa Student Kathmandu 2. Cultural Dance Syangja 3. Paragliding with Banners Kaski 4. Joined a Rally Lalitpur Each campaign activities was conducted under the main banner of COP21 and campaign materials like non- plastic bags, pamphlets, stickers were distributed to participants of the campaign. Ph: +977-01-4485827 Email: [email protected] Website: www.ageingnepal.org 1 Major Highlights of the Campaign Total media mobilization: Print media: 1; Television programme: 2; Radio programme: 1 Total people reached with Media: 9,000,000 Total
  • List of Publications WIN 1 Nov, 06

    List of Publications WIN 1 Nov, 06

    WINROCK INTERNATIONAL POLICY ANALYSIS IN AGRICULTURE AND RELATED RESOURCE MANAGEMENT LIST OF PUBLICATIONS (Listed by Series Name/Author's Name/Title/Year) A. NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PAPER SERIES (until 1989): Office Copy 1. Bachchu Prasad Koirala, "Economics of Land Reform in Nepal: Case Study of Dhanusha District", July 1987. 2. Om Prasad Gurung, "Interrelationships among Pasture, Animal Husbandry and Agriculture: Case Study of Tara", July 1987. 3. C.M. Pokharel, "Community Fish Farming in Nepal Tarai: Case Study of Bhawanipur and Hanuman Nagar", July 1987. 4. Mahesh Prasad Pant, "Community Participation in Irrigation Management: Case Study of Solma Irrigation Project in East Nepal", August 1987. 5. Bandana Pradhan, "Animal Nutrition and Pasture Fodder Management: The Case of Mahespur", November 1987. 6. Prakash Dev Pant, "Socioeconomic Consequences of Land Ownership Polarization in Nepal: Case Study of Nemuwatole Village", November 1987. 7. Badri Jha, "Evaluation of Land Tenure System: Case Study of Jaisithok Village ", November 1987. 8. Upendra Gautam, "Institution Building and Rural Development in Nepal: Gadkhar Water Users' Committee", November 1987. 9. Parashar B. Malla, "Group Fish Farming Under the Small Farmers Development Project at Chandranagar", December 1987. 10. S.P. Shrestha, "Community-managed Irrigation Systems: Case Study of Arughat- Vishal Nagar Pipe Irrigation Project", December 1987. 11. Bimal Prasad Dhungel, "Sociocultural and Legal Arrangements for Grazing on Public Land: Case Study of Bahadurganj", December 1987. 12. Murari M. Aryal, "Participatory Irrigation Management: Case Study of Bhadrutar and Hakuwa Canals",December 1987. 1 13. Ramesh Bista, "Cross-Sectional Variations and Temporal Changes in Land Area under Tenancy and their Implications for Agricultural Productivity", January 1989.
  • Strengthening the Role of Civil Society and Women in Democracy And

    Strengthening the Role of Civil Society and Women in Democracy And

    HARIYO BAN PROGRAM Monitoring and Evaluation Plan 25 November 2011 – 25 August 2016 (Cooperative Agreement No: AID-367-A-11-00003) Submitted to: UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT NEPAL MISSION Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal Submitted by: WWF in partnership with CARE, FECOFUN and NTNC P.O. Box 7660, Baluwatar, Kathmandu, Nepal First approved on April 18, 2013 Updated and approved on January 5, 2015 Updated and approved on July 31, 2015 Updated and approved on August 31, 2015 Updated and approved on January 19, 2016 January 19, 2016 Ms. Judy Oglethorpe Chief of Party, Hariyo Ban Program WWF Nepal Baluwatar, Kathmandu Subject: Approval for revised M&E Plan for the Hariyo Ban Program Reference: Cooperative Agreement # 367-A-11-00003 Dear Judy, This letter is in response to the updated Monitoring and Evaluation Plan (M&E Plan) for the Hariyo Program that you submitted to me on January 14, 2016. I would like to thank WWF and all consortium partners (CARE, NTNC, and FECOFUN) for submitting the updated M&E Plan. The revised M&E Plan is consistent with the approved Annual Work Plan and the Program Description of the Cooperative Agreement (CA). This updated M&E has added/revised/updated targets to systematically align additional earthquake recovery funding added into the award through 8th modification of Hariyo Ban award to WWF to address very unexpected and burning issues, primarily in four Hariyo Ban program districts (Gorkha, Dhading, Rasuwa and Nuwakot) and partly in other districts, due to recent earthquake and associated climatic/environmental challenges. This updated M&E Plan, including its added/revised/updated indicators and targets, will have very good programmatic meaning for the program’s overall performance monitoring process in the future.

  • Identity-Based Conflict and the Role of Print Media in the Pahadi Community of Contemporary Nepal Sunil Kumar Pokhrel Kennesaw State University

    Kennesaw State University DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University Dissertations, Theses and Capstone Projects 7-2015 Identity-Based Conflict and the Role of Print Media in the Pahadi Community of Contemporary Nepal Sunil Kumar Pokhrel Kennesaw State University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/etd Part of the International and Area Studies Commons, Peace and Conflict Studies Commons, and the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Pokhrel, Sunil Kumar, "Identity-Based Conflict and the Role of Print Media in the Pahadi Community of Contemporary Nepal" (2015). Dissertations, Theses and Capstone Projects. Paper 673. This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses and Capstone Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. IDENTITY-BASED CONFLICT AND PRINT MEDIA IDENTITY-BASED CONFLICT AND THE ROLE OF PRINT MEDIA IN THE PAHADI COMMUNITY OF CONTEMPORARY NEPAL by SUNIL KUMAR POKHREL A Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in International Conflict Management in the College of Humanities and Social Sciences Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia March 2015 IDENTITY-BASED CONFLICT AND PRINT MEDIA © 2015 Sunil Kumar Pokhrel ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Recommended Citation Pokhrel, S. K. (2015). Identity-based conflict and the role of print media in the Pahadi community of contemporary Nepal. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia, United States of America. IDENTITY-BASED CONFLICT AND PRINT MEDIA DEDICATION My mother and father, who encouraged me toward higher study, My wife, who always supported me in all difficult circumstances, and My sons, who trusted me during my PhD studies.
  • Solid Waste Management

    Solid Waste Management

    Technical Assistance Consultant’s Report Project Number: 36188 November 2008 NEPAL: Preparing the Secondary Towns Integrated Urban Environmental Improvement Project (Financed by the: Japan Special Fund and the Netherlands Trust Fund for the Water Financing Partnership Facility) Prepared by: Padeco Co. Ltd. in association with Metcon Consultants, Nepal Tokyo, Japan For Department of Urban Development and Building Construction This consultant’s report does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB or the Government concerned, and ADB and the Government cannot be held liable for its contents. (For project preparatory technical assistance: All the views expressed herein may not be incorporated into the proposed project’s design. TA 7182-NEP PREPARING THE SECONDARY TOWNS INTEGRATED URBAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Volume 3: SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT in association with TA 7182-NEP PREPARING THE SECONDARY TOWNS INTEGRATED URBAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FINAL REPORT Volume 3: SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT June 2010 Prepared for the Asian Development Bank and the Government of Nepal in association with Tsunashima No. 2 Building METCON Consultants 3-20-12 Yushima P.O. Box 4412 Bunkyo-ku 43 / 15 Dandibaba Marg, Tangal, Tokyo 113-0034 Kathmadu-2, Japan Nepal Tel: +81-3-5812-1091 Tel: +977-1-441-2902 Fax: +81-3-5812-1092 Fax: +977-1- 441-8478 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Acronyms ADB Asian Development Bank CBS Central Bureau of Statistics CCFUG Charpala Community Forest User Group CDM Clean Development Mechanism DDC
  • Nepal's Birds 2010

    Nepal's Birds 2010

    Bird Conservation Nepal (BCN) Established in 1982, Bird Conservation BCN is a membership-based organisation Nepal (BCN) is the leading organisation in with a founding President, patrons, life Nepal, focusing on the conservation of birds, members, friends of BCN and active supporters. their habitats and sites. It seeks to promote Our membership provides strength to the interest in birds among the general public, society and is drawn from people of all walks OF THE STATE encourage research on birds, and identify of life from students, professionals, and major threats to birds’ continued survival. As a conservationists. Our members act collectively result, BCN is the foremost scientific authority to set the organisation’s strategic agenda. providing accurate information on birds and their habitats throughout Nepal. We provide We are committed to showing the value of birds scientific data and expertise on birds for the and their special relationship with people. As Government of Nepal through the Department such, we strongly advocate the need for peoples’ of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation participation as future stewards to attain long- Birds Nepal’s (DNPWC) and work closely in birds and term conservation goals. biodiversity conservation throughout the country. As the Nepalese Partner of BirdLife International, a network of more than 110 organisations around the world, BCN also works on a worldwide agenda to conserve the world’s birds and their habitats. 2010 Indicators for our changing world Indicators THE STATE OF Nepal’s Birds
  • CHITWAN-ANNAPURNA LANDSCAPE: a RAPID ASSESSMENT Published in August 2013 by WWF Nepal

    CHITWAN-ANNAPURNA LANDSCAPE: a RAPID ASSESSMENT Published in August 2013 by WWF Nepal

    Hariyo Ban Program CHITWAN-ANNAPURNA LANDSCAPE: A RAPID ASSESSMENT Published in August 2013 by WWF Nepal Any reproduction of this publication in full or in part must mention the title and credit the above-mentioned publisher as the copyright owner. Citation: WWF Nepal 2013. Chitwan Annapurna Landscape (CHAL): A Rapid Assessment, Nepal, August 2013 Cover photo: © Neyret & Benastar / WWF-Canon Gerald S. Cubitt / WWF-Canon Simon de TREY-WHITE / WWF-UK James W. Thorsell / WWF-Canon Michel Gunther / WWF-Canon WWF Nepal, Hariyo Ban Program / Pallavi Dhakal Disclaimer This report is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of Kathmandu Forestry College (KAFCOL) and do not necessarily reflect the views of WWF, USAID or the United States Government. © WWF Nepal. All rights reserved. WWF Nepal, PO Box: 7660 Baluwatar, Kathmandu, Nepal T: +977 1 4434820, F: +977 1 4438458 [email protected] www.wwfnepal.org/hariyobanprogram Hariyo Ban Program CHITWAN-ANNAPURNA LANDSCAPE: A RAPID ASSESSMENT Foreword With its diverse topographical, geographical and climatic variation, Nepal is rich in biodiversity and ecosystem services. It boasts a large diversity of flora and fauna at genetic, species and ecosystem levels. Nepal has several critical sites and wetlands including the fragile Churia ecosystem. These critical sites and biodiversity are subjected to various anthropogenic and climatic threats. Several bilateral partners and donors are working in partnership with the Government of Nepal to conserve Nepal’s rich natural heritage. USAID funded Hariyo Ban Program, implemented by a consortium of four partners with WWF Nepal leading alongside CARE Nepal, FECOFUN and NTNC, is working towards reducing the adverse impacts of climate change, threats to biodiversity and improving livelihoods of the people in Nepal.
  • Nepal: Phase II (1 April 2010 –31 March 2012)

    Nepal: Phase II (1 April 2010 –31 March 2012)

    Final Report Small-Scale Aquaculture Program AwF-Nepal: Phase II (1 April 2010 –31 March 2012) Prepared by Ram C Bhujel1, Madhav K Shrestha2, Hare Ram Devkota3 and Agni Nepal3 1Asian Institute of Technology (AIT), Thailand 2Institute of Agriculture and Animal Sciences (IAAS), Chitwan, Nepal 3Nepal Agriculture Research Council (NARC) July 2012 Executive Summary This report is the summary of activities and outcomes of the AwF-Nepal Project Phase II accomplished during the project period (1 April 2010 – 31 March 2012). This project is the extension and expansion of the 2- year AwF-Nepal project initiated in Rainas Tar, Lamjung in 2008. Ninety (90) families were supported to incorporate small-scale aquaculture in their farming system in three districts; namely, Lamjung (Dhamilikuwa, Chakratirtha and Valayakharka), Gorkha (Putlikhet) and Nawal Parasi (Dedhgaon). Farmers were organized in five groups of 14, 15, 23, 22 and 16 respectively. Project was expanded to two locations namely; Valayakharka (Lamjung) and Dedhgaon (Nawal Parasi) in the second year after successful launching in three locations during the first year (2011). Overall average size of the pond was 49m2with a range of 29 - 75 m2. Total fish production per family ranged from 7.6 - 126 kg with the overall average of 37kg. Out of which over half (51%, range 18-61%) was sold. Without proper feeding, productivity of ponds remained reasonably high i.e. 7.2 ton per ha (range 1.9-21.2 ton/ha). Among the five groups, the group in Gorkha showed excellent results. Total production of the group reached to 1.9 to in 2010 which increased to 2.8 ton in 2011 with the productivity of 14.6 and 21.2 ton per ha respectively which demonstrated the possibility of earnings (up to US$3.38 per capita per day) required to cross the poverty bench mark (1.25) set by the World Bank.
  • Transmission Cov-Web

    Transmission Cov-Web

    MESSAGE FROM THE MANAGING DIRECTOR It gives me great pleasure to pen these words for the Transmission Directorate and the Project Management Directorate’s joint year book on the occasion of Nepal Electricity Authority’s 36th anniversary. Transmission and Project Management Directorate together have been essential in bridging the growth in generation and distribution in Nepal. With the growing infrastructure within these directorates, we have been able to evacuate large amounts of power being produced or purchased in the country to anywhere within the rapidly growing electricity network which is the Integrated Nepal Power System (INPS). Work in the field of transmission line can be exceptionally challenging especially this year with the Covid-19 pandemic still looming over us, but both the directorates have pulled through and I would like to congratulate the Transmission Directorate and PMD for yet another successful year adding 604.74 ckt. km and 2134 MVA . This fiscal year also marked the completion and inauguration of 400 kV Dhalkebar the first of its kind, marking the entry of Nepal in the Extra High Voltage 400 kV system. This has been regarded as a remarkable milestones in the Nepalese power system. The completion of Dana-Kushma 220 kV transmission line and 132 kV Samudratar -trishuli 3B hub transmission line in this year has also made the system robust. The long troubled Singati- Lamosaghu transmission line has also seen its 1st circuit completed this year. I am also glad to note that work is ongoing in these directorates to [insert what has been going on in planning and system improvement/ upgradation sector].
  • Forest Management Audit 2016

    Forest Management Audit 2016

    Forest Management and Conservation (District Forest Office- Bara, Chitwan, Nawalparasi, and Rupandehi) Final Report of Environment Audit, 2016 (2072) l lll lllll lllll llll lll l Office of the Auditor General, Nepal Kathamandu, Nepal. 1 Forest Management and Conservation (District Forest Office- Bara, Chitwan, Nawalparasi, and Rupandehi) Final report of Environment Audit, 2016 (2072) Introduction 1. Background - Forest is one of important renewable national resources. Effective management and proper use of this resource could significantly contribute in economic and social development of a country, protection of environment and availability of essential goods and services to the majority of people residing in remote area. If forest resources are not properly managed, many environment problems may emerge Key Performance Indicator (KPI) caused by the degradation of forest • Systematic demarcation of forest resources. Sustainable and scientific • Removing Forest Encroachment • Implementation of Agreement management of forests are imperative to • Protection and monitoring of address the concerns of climate change and afforestation • REDD (Reducing Emissions from Controlling grazing and forest fire Deforestation and Forest Degradation). • Controlling export smuggling Existing Forest Policy and laws aim to • Scientific forest management achieve economic and social development through implementation of developed concepts in sustainable forest management, environment protection, bio-diversity and climate change. District Forest Offices have been
  • C E N T R a L W E S T E

    C E N T R a L W E S T E

    Bhijer J u m l a Saldang N E P A L - W E S T E R N R E G I O N Patarasi Chhonhup f Zones, Districts and Village Development Committees, April 2015 Tinje Lo M anthang Kaingaon National boundary Zone boundary Village Development Comm ittee boundary Phoksundo Chhosar Region boundary District boundary Gothichour Charang Date Created: 28 Apr 2015 Contact: [email protected] Data sources: WFP, Survey Department of Nepal, SRTM Website: www.wfp.org 0 10 20 40 Rim i Prepared by: HQ, OSEP GIS The designations employed and the presentation of material in M I D - W E Dho S T E R N the map(s) do not imply the expression of any opinion on the Kilom eters part of WFP concerning the legal or constitutional status of any Map Reference: country, territory, city or sea, or concerning the delimitation of its ± frontiers or boundaries. Sarmi NPL_ADMIN_WesternRegion_A0L Pahada © World Food Programme 2015 Narku Chharka Liku Gham i Tripurakot Kalika K A R N A L I FAR-W ESTERN Lhan Raha MID-W ESTERN BJ a Hj a Er kRo It Surkhang Bhagawatitol Juphal D o l p a M u s t a n g W ESTERN Lawan Suhu Chhusang CENTRAL Gotam kot EASTERN Dunai Majhphal Mukot Kagbeni Sahartara Jhong Phu Nar Syalakhadhi Sisne Marpha Muktinath Jom som Tangkim anang Tukuche Ranm am aikot M a n a n g Baphikot Jang Pipal Pwang R u k u m Kowang Khangsar Ghyaru Mudi Pokhara M y a g d i Bhraka Sam agaun Gurja Ransi Hukam Syalpakha Kunjo Thoche W LeteE S T Manang E R N Chokhawang Kanda Narachyang Sankh Shova Chhekam par Kol Bagarchhap Pisang Kuinem angale Marwang Taksera Prok Dana Bihi Lulang Chim khola
  • BIODIVERSITY, PEOPLE and CLIMATE CHANGE Final Technical Report of the Hariyo Ban Program, First Phase

    BIODIVERSITY, PEOPLE and CLIMATE CHANGE Final Technical Report of the Hariyo Ban Program, First Phase

    BIODIVERSITY, PEOPLE AND CLIMATE CHANGE Final Technical Report of the Hariyo Ban Program, First Phase Volume Two Detailed Annexes HARIYO BAN PROGRAM This final technical report for Hariyo Ban Program Phase One is submitted to the United States Agency for International Development Nepal Mission by World Wildlife Fund Nepal in partnership with CARE, the Federation of Community Forest Users Nepal and the National Trust for Nature Conservation, under Cooperative Agreement Number AID-367-A-11-00003. © WWF Nepal 2017 All rights reserved Citation Please cite this report as: WWF Nepal. 2017. Biodiversity, People and Climate Change: Final Technical Report of the Hariyo Ban Program, First Phase. WWF Nepal, Hariyo Ban Program, Kathmandu, Nepal. Cover photo credit © Karine Aigner/WWF-US Disclaimer: This report is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of WWF and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. 7 April, 2017 Table of Contents ANNEX 5: HARIYO BAN PROGRAM WORKING AREAS ......................................................................... 1 ANNEX 6: COMMUNITY BASED ANTI-POACHING UNITS FORMED/REFORMED ................................. 4 ANNEX 7: SUPPORT FOR INTEGRATED SUB-WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLANS ........................... 11 ANNEX 8: CHARACTERISTICS OF PAYMENTS FOR ECOSYSTEM SERVICES SCHEMES PILOTED ......... 12 ANNEX 9: COMMUNITY ADAPTATION PLANS OF ACTION PREPARED .............................................