HARIYO BAN PROGRAM Semiannual Performance Report 15 July 2016

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

HARIYO BAN PROGRAM Semiannual Performance Report 15 July 2016 HARIYO BAN PROGRAM Semiannual Performance Report 15 July 2016 – 30 December 2016 (Cooperative Agreement No: AID-367-A-16-00008) Submitted to: THE UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT NEPAL MISSION Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal Submitted by: WWF in partnership with CARE, FECOFUN and NTNC P.O. Box 7660, Kathmandu, Nepal 1 February 2017 Table of Contents LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ................................................................................................ iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................. 1 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Goal and Objectives .................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Overview of beneficiaries and stakeholders ............................................................................. 2 2.3 Working areas ............................................................................................................................. 3 2. MAJOR ACHIEVEMENTS OF THE REPORTING PERIOD .................................................... 4 2.1 Objective 1: Biodiversity conservation...................................................................................... 4 2.2 Objective 2: Climate change adaptation ................................................................................. 11 2.3 Gender and Social Inclusion .................................................................................................... 18 2.4 Governance ................................................................................................................................ 21 2.5 Highlights of achievements at working unit levels ................................................................. 23 3. OVERARCHING THEMES AND ACTIVITIES.......................................................................... 32 3.1 Startup Activities................................................................................................................... 32 3.2 Small Grant Program ........................................................................................................... 33 3.3 Internship ............................................................................................................................... 33 3.4 Communications.................................................................................................................... 33 3.5 Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning ................................................................................ 34 3.8 Sustainability ......................................................................................................................... 35 4. MANAGEMENT .............................................................................................................................. 35 4.1 Coordination and Collaboration .......................................................................................... 35 4.2 Operating Environment including Risk and Mitigation Plan ........................................... 35 5. OPPORTUNITES AND PROSPECTS FOR NEXT SIX MONTHS ........................................... 36 5.1 Opportunities ......................................................................................................................... 36 5.2 Prospects for the next six months ........................................................................................ 36 ANNEXES ................................................................................................................................................. 37 ii List of Figures Figure 1: Map showing Hariyo Ban working landscapes ............................................................................. 3 Figure 2: Results chain for Objective 1: Improve the conservation and management of GON-identified biodiverse landscapes-CHAL and TAL ........................................................................................................ 5 Figure 3: Results chain for Objective 2: Reducing climate change vulnerability in CHAL and TAL ...... 12 Figure 4: Map showing planned interventions for first year in Shuklaphanta Brahmadev Complex ......... 23 Figure 5: Map showing planned interventions for first year in Bardia-Karnali Complex .......................... 24 Figure 6: Map showing planned interventions for first year in Banke-Kamdi Complex ............................ 25 Figure 7: Map showing planned interventions for first year in Chitwan Barandabar Complex ................. 26 Figure 8: Map showing planned interventions for first year in Seti sub-river basin ................................... 28 Figure 9: Map showing planned interventions for the first year in Marsyangdi sub-river basin ................ 29 Figure 10: Map showing planned interventions for first year in Daraundi sub- river basin ....................... 31 List of Tables Table 1: Total beneficiaries reached/participated in Biodiversity Conservation activities ........................... 4 Table 2: Summary of progress on biodiversity activities.............................................................................. 6 Table 3: Total beneficiaries reached/participated in Climate Change Adaptation activities ...................... 13 Table 4: Summary of progress on Climate change activities ...................................................................... 14 Table 5: Total beneficiaries reached/participated in GESI related activities .............................................. 18 Table 6: Summary of progress on GESI activities ...................................................................................... 19 Table 7: Total beneficiaries reached/participated in Governance activities ............................................... 21 Table 8: Summary of progress on Governance activities ........................................................................... 22 Table 9: Major interventions and significant achievements in Shuklaphanta-Brahmadev complex .......... 24 Table 10: Major interventions and significant achievements in Bardia-Karnali complex .......................... 25 Table 11: Major interventions and significant achievements in Banke-Kamdi complex ........................... 26 Table 12: Major interventions and significant achievements in Chitwan Barandabhar complex ............... 27 Table 13: Major interventions and significant achievements in Seti sub-river basin ................................. 28 Table 14: Major interventions and significant achievements in Marsyangdi sub-river basin..................... 30 Table 15:Major interventions and significant achievements in Daraundi sub- river basin ......................... 30 Table 16: Progress on the start of activities ................................................................................................ 32 iii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ACA Annapurna Conservation Area ACAP Annapurna Conservation Area Project AWP Annual Work Plan BaNP Banke National Park BIA Biodiversity Important Area BNP Bardia National Park BZ Buffer Zone BZCFUG Buffer Zone Community Forest User Group BZUC Buffer Zone Users Committee CA Conservation Area CAMC Conservation Area Management Committee CAPA Community Adaptation Plan of Action CARE Cooperative for Assistance and Relief Everywhere CBAPU Community-based Anti-Poaching Unit CCA Climate Change Adaptation CDMC Community Disaster Management Committee CFUG Community Forest Users Group CHAL Chitwan-Annapurna Landscape CLA Collaborating, Learning and Adapting CLAC Community Learning and Action Center CNP Chitwan National Park CSO Civil Society Organization DADO District Agriculture Development Office DDC District Development Committee DDRC District Disaster Relief Committee DEOC District Emergency Operations Centre DFO District Forest Office DHM Department Of Hydrology and Meteorology DNPWC Department of National Parks & Wildlife Conservation DRR Disaster Risk Reduction DSCO District Soil Conservation Office DSCWM Department of Soil Conservation and Watershed Management EFLG Environment Friendly Local Governance FECOFUN Federation of Community Forestry Users Nepal FEMMP Framework Environmental Mitigation and Monitoring Plan GBV Gender Based Violence GCF Green Climate Fund iv GESI Gender Equality and Social Inclusion GoN Government of Nepal GRR Green Recovery and Reconstruction HH Household HWC Human Wildlife Conflict ICA Integrated Capacity Assessment ICIMOD International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development IGA Income Generating Activities IRBM Integrated River Basin Management ISWMP Integrated Sub-Watershed Management Plan LAPA Local Adaptation Plan of Action LDRMP Local Disaster Risk Management Plan LHFGs Leasehold Forestry Groups LRP Local Resource Person MCA Manaslu Conservation Area MCAP Manaslu Conservation Area Project MEL Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning MOFALD Ministry of Federal Affairs and Local Development MOFSC Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation MOPE Ministry of Population and Environment MoWCSW Ministry of Women, Children and Social Welfare NAP National Adaptation Plan NCDMC National Network of Community Disaster Management Committees NRM Natural Resource Management NTNC National Trust for Nature Conservation PA Protected Areas PANI Program for Aquatic Natural Resources Improvement PES Payments
Recommended publications
  • January, 2017 Musk Deer, an Endangered and IUCN Appendix I Listed Animal Species, Is Crepuscular
    Project update: January, 2017 Musk deer, an endangered and IUCN Appendix I listed animal species, is crepuscular (active during dawn or dusk). Being a small mammal, and residing on a dense cover, it is mostly inconspicuous. But the most notable indicator in its habitat are its latrines. Therefore, this project has identified that latrines should be the prime focus for musk deer study and conservation. In this context, we have collected fresh latrine samples and will assess the population through the DNA study. The preliminary scientific visit has been accomplished; during the visit, we have identified five Village Development Committees (VDCs) - Pisang, Manang, Bharka, Nawal, Ghyaru and Khangsar - as the potential habitats of the musk deer in the Manang district, Annapurna Conservation Area. Among them, forests of Pisang and Manage were intensively surveyed and fresh latrines were also collected. Further, from each site, we had collected fresh latrines for the five times and the total latrines were collected in 10 days. Fresh latrine samples were collected every morning, 7-11 am. Collected fresh latrine samples were stored in different tubes containing ethanol and silica separately. We had collected 126 samples, in total, and sent to laboratory for further analysis. Furthermore, p otential habitat of these two VDCs were categorised into three types of forests viz. pine forest (Pinus wallichina dominanted), Mixed forest (Abies, Pinus wallichina and Betula utilits all are present) and Betula forest (Betula utilis dominated). During the preliminary visit, a musk deer was found to be killed by poachers and the pod was already removed from the body; sorrowfully, the deer was hung in a tree.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Lake Basin Management Plan of Lake Cluster of Pokhara Valley, Nepal (2018-2023)
    Integrated Lake Basin Management Plan Of Lake Cluster of Pokhara Valley, Nepal (2018-2023) Nepal Valley, Pokhara of Cluster Lake Of Plan Management Basin Lake Integrated INTEGRATED LAKE BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN OF LAKE CLUSTER OF POKHARA VALLEY, NEPAL (2018-2023) Government of Nepal Ministry of Forests and Environment Singha Durbar, Kathmandu, Nepal Tel: +977-1- 4211567, Fax: +977-1-4211868 Government of Nepal Email: [email protected], Website: www.mofe.gov.np Ministry of Forests and Environment INTEGRATED LAKE BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN OF LAKE CLUSTER OF POKHARA VALLEY, NEPAL (2018-2023) Government of Nepal Ministry of Forests and Environment Publisher: Government of Nepal Ministry of Forests and Environment Citation: MoFE, 2018. Integrated Lake Basin Management Plan of Lake Cluster of Pokhara Valley, Nepal (2018-2023). Ministry of Forests and Environment, Kathmandu, Nepal. Cover Photo Credits: Front cover - Rupa and Begnas Lake © Amit Poudyal, IUCN Back cover – Begnas Lake © WWF Nepal, Hariyo Ban Program/ Nabin Baral © Ministry of Forests and Environment, 2018 Acronyms and Abbreviations ACA Annapurna Conservation Area ADB Asian Development Bank ARM Annapurna Rural Municipality BCN Bird Conservation Nepal BLCC Begnas Lake Conservation Cooperative BMP Budhi Bazar Madatko Patan CBD Convention on Biological Diversity CBS Central Bureau of Statistics CF Community Forest CFUG Community Forest User Group CITES Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora DADO District Agriculture Development Office DCC District Coordination
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality in Pokhara: a Study with Microbiological Aspects
    A Peer Reviewed TECHNICAL JOURNAL Vol 2, No.1, October 2020 Nepal Engineers' Association, Gandaki Province ISSN : 2676-1416 (Print) Pp.: 149- 161 WATER QUALITY IN POKHARA: A STUDY WITH MICROBIOLOGICAL ASPECTS Kishor Kumar Shrestha Department of Civil and Geomatics Engineering Pashchimanchal Campus, Pokhara E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Obviously, water management is challenging issue in developing world. Dwellers of Pokhara use water from government supply along with deep borings and other sources as well. Nowadays, people are also showing tendency towards more use of processed water. In spite of its importance, quality analysis of water has been less emphasized by concerned sectors in our cities including Pokhara. The study aimed for qualitative analysis of water in the city with focus on microbiological aspects. For this purpose, results of laboratory examination of water samples from major sources of government supply, deep borings, hospitals, academic institutions as well as key water bodies situated in Pokhara were analyzed. Since water borne diseases are considered quite common in the area, presence of coliform bacteria was considered for the study to assess the question on availability of safe water. The result showed that all the samples during wet seasons of major water sources of water in Pokhara were contaminated by coliform bacteria. Likewise, in all 20 locations of Seti River, the coliform bacteria were recorded. Similar results with biological contamination in all samples were observed after laboratory examination of more than 60 locations of all three lakes: Phewa Lake, Begnas Lake and Rupa Lake in Pokhara. The presence of such bacteria in most of the water samples of main sources during wet seasons revealed the possibilities of spreading water related diseases.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study from Nepal
    Language Documentation & Conservation Special Publication No. 13 (July 2017) Documenting Variation in Endangered Languages ed. by Kristine A. Hildebrandt, Carmen Jany, and Wilson Silva, pp. 152-179 http://nlfrc.hawaii.edu/ldc/ 8 http://handle.net/24753 Areal Analysis of Language Attitudes and Practices: A Case Study from Nepal Kristine A. Hildebrandt and Shunfu Hu Southern Illinois University Edwardsville This paper has two aims. One aim is to consider non-structural (language attitude and use) variables as valid in the field of dialect and linguistic geography in an inner Himalayan valley of Nepal, where four languages have traditionally co- existed asymmetrically and which demonstrate different degrees of vitality vs. endangerment. The other aim is an application of modified spatiality as it aligns with speaker attitudes and practices amidst recent and ongoing socio-economic and population changes. We demonstrate that variation in self-reported attitudes and practices across languages in this region can be explained as much with adjusted spatial factors (labeled ‘social space’) as with traditional social factors (e.g. gender, age, formal education, occupation, etc.). As such, our study contributes to a dis- course on the role and potential of spatiality in sociolinguistic analyses of smaller language communities. 1. INTRODUCTION. In a recent paper on sampling in dialectology research, Buchstaller and Alvanides lament that until recently, “The majority of sociolinguistic work [could] be described as spatially naïve, using geographical space merely as a canvas…on to which the results of linguistic analysis [could] be mapped.” (2013: 96). This need for inclusion and testing of different types of spatial factors alongside social ones is increasingly being addressed in regions like the United States and Great Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • Hariyo Ban Program Ii
    HARIYO BAN PROGRAM II Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning (MEL) Plan Date: [April 4, 2017] Version: Final [Contract/Agreement] Number: [AID-367-A-16-00008] Activity Start Date and End Date: [July 15, 2016 to July 14, 2021] Submitted by: [WWF in partnership with CARE, FECOFUN and NTNC] [Baluwatar, Kathmandu, Nepal] Tel: [977 1-4410942] Email: [[email protected]] This document was produced for review by the1 United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by WWF Nepal. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. © WWF 2016 All rights reserved Any reproduction of this publication in full or in part must mention the title and credit WWF. Published by WWF Nepal PO Box: 7660 Baluwatar, Kathmandu, Nepal T: +977 1 4434820, F: +977 1 4438458 [email protected], www.wwfnepal.org/hariyobanprogram Disclaimer This plan is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Acronoyms and Abbreviation ........................................................... 2 1. Introduction .......................................................................................... 4 2. Hariyo Ban II Conceptual Model and Result Framework ..................... 5 3. Theory of Change ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vulnerability and Impacts Assessment for Adaptation Planning In
    VULNERABILITY AND I M PAC T S A SSESSMENT FOR A DA P TAT I O N P LANNING IN PA N C H A S E M O U N TA I N E C O L O G I C A L R E G I O N , N EPAL IMPLEMENTING AGENCY IMPLEMENTING PARTNERS SUPPORTED BY Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation, Department of Forests UNE P Empowered lives. Resilient nations. VULNERABILITY AND I M PAC T S A SSESSMENT FOR A DA P TAT I O N P LANNING IN PA N C H A S E M O U N TA I N E C O L O G I C A L R E G I O N , N EPAL Copyright © 2015 Mountain EbA Project, Nepal The material in this publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit uses, without prior written permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. We would appreciate receiving a copy of any product which uses this publication as a source. Citation: Dixit, A., Karki, M. and Shukla, A. (2015): Vulnerability and Impacts Assessment for Adaptation Planning in Panchase Mountain Ecological Region, Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal: Government of Nepal, United Nations Environment Programme, United Nations Development Programme, International Union for Conservation of Nature, German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety and Institute for Social and Environmental Transition-Nepal. ISBN : 978-9937-8519-2-3 Published by: Government of Nepal (GoN), United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety (BMUB) and Institute for Social and Environmental Transition-Nepal (ISET-N).
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison Growing Stock, Carbon Stock and Biodiversity in and Around Banke National Park, Nepal
    International Journal of Advanced Research in Botany (IJARB) Volume 5, Issue 4, 2019, PP 1-9 ISSN No. (Online) 2455-4316 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2455-4316.0504001 www.arcjournals.org Comparison Growing Stock, Carbon Stock and Biodiversity in and Around Banke National Park, Nepal Ganesh Bahadur Khadka1, Ram Asheshwar Mandal2*, Ajay Bhakta Mathema3 1Department of Forests and Soil Conservation 2,3School of Environmental Science and Management(SchEMS), Kathmandu, Nepal *Corresponding Author: Ram Asheshwar Mandal, School of Environmental Science and Management(SchEMS), Kathmandu, Nepal Abstract: Forests offer life and love to the living beings therefore, they perform enormous functions like ecosystem services, biodiversity and carbon stock but such researches are limited in Nepal. Therefore, this st udy was objectively carried out to compare the growing stock, carbon stock and biodiversity in and around Banke National Park (BaNP). The map of the study was prepared it was divided into six blocks were delineated specifically. Altogether 90 sample plots, particularly, 15 plots in each block were laid in the field. Circular nested plots having 8.92, 5.64, 1 and 0.56 m radius were established in the field to measure tree, poles, sapling and seedlings respectively. The soil samples were collected from 0–10, 10–20, and 20–30 cm depth. The diameter (at 1.3 m) and height of trees/poles/sapling were measured. The biomass was estimated using equation of Chave et al, and soil carbon was analyzed using Walkley and Black method. It was found that 104 trees/ha, 416poles/ha and 1991saplings/ha in BaNP.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Individual Responses: Khangsar MM3
    Selected Individual Responses: Khangsar_MM3 Interview carried out on 16 June, 7:30 pm Khangsar VDC, ward no 2, Khangsar, Nepal Audio recording with Marantz PMD660 and Audio-Technica omnidirectional stereo hand- held microphone General and Personal Information 1. What is your name? Pema Ongkel Gurung 2. What is your age? 43 3. What is your mother-tongue? Ngisjanba 4. From what clan are you? Gurung- caste, Lamchhane - clan 5. What languages do you speak now in your regularly daily life? More Ngisjanpa, less Nepali. 6. Where were you born and how long did you live there? Khangsar VDC – 2. 7. Do you live in Kathmandu all year through? 3 months in winter. 8. Does your whole immediate family live in Kathmandu? Parents in Kathmandu. 9. How frequently do you return to your village? After 3 months. 10. How long do you stay in village? 9 months. 11. How often do you travel outside of your village? Sometimes goes to Pokhara because his son studies there. 12. Where do you typically go to, or for what purpose? Sometimes goes to Pokhara because his son studies there. 13. Which months do you travel in usually? - 14. Are your parents living now? Both living. 15. Where are your parents from? Are their mother-tongue languages the same as yours? If not, what are their mother-tongue languages? Both from Khangsar. 16. Do you have siblings? Are you the eldest, or the youngest, or are you in the middle? 6 children. He is fifth child. 17. When you were a child, what languages did you speak with your siblings? Nepali.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal
    SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics Acknowledgements The completion of both this and the earlier feasibility report follows extensive consultation with the National Planning Commission, Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), World Food Programme (WFP), UNICEF, World Bank, and New ERA, together with members of the Statistics and Evidence for Policy, Planning and Results (SEPPR) working group from the International Development Partners Group (IDPG) and made up of people from Asian Development Bank (ADB), Department for International Development (DFID), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), UNICEF and United States Agency for International Development (USAID), WFP, and the World Bank. WFP, UNICEF and the World Bank commissioned this research. The statistical analysis has been undertaken by Professor Stephen Haslett, Systemetrics Research Associates and Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand and Associate Prof Geoffrey Jones, Dr. Maris Isidro and Alison Sefton of the Institute of Fundamental Sciences - Statistics, Massey University, New Zealand. We gratefully acknowledge the considerable assistance provided at all stages by the Central Bureau of Statistics. Special thanks to Bikash Bista, Rudra Suwal, Dilli Raj Joshi, Devendra Karanjit, Bed Dhakal, Lok Khatri and Pushpa Raj Paudel. See Appendix E for the full list of people consulted. First published: December 2014 Design and processed by: Print Communication, 4241355 ISBN: 978-9937-3000-976 Suggested citation: Haslett, S., Jones, G., Isidro, M., and Sefton, A. (2014) Small Area Estimation of Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal, Central Bureau of Statistics, National Planning Commissions Secretariat, World Food Programme, UNICEF and World Bank, Kathmandu, Nepal, December 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • GALA) – the University of Greenwich Open Access Repository
    Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (GALA) – the University of Greenwich open access repository http://gala.gre.ac.uk __________________________________________________________________________________________ Citation: Budhathoki, Prabhu (2012) Developing conservation governance strategies: holistic management of protected areas in Nepal. PhD thesis, University of Greenwich. __________________________________________________________________________________________ Please note that the full text version provided on GALA is the final published version awarded by the university. “I certify that this work has not been accepted in substance for any degree, and is not concurrently being submitted for any degree other than that of (name of research degree) being studied at the University of Greenwich. I also declare that this work is the result of my own investigations except where otherwise identified by references and that I have not plagiarised the work of others”. Budhathoki, Prabhu (2012) Developing conservation governance strategies: holistic management of protected areas in Nepal. ##thesis _type## , ##institution## Available at: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/9453/ __________________________________________________________________________________________ Contact: [email protected] DEVELOPING CONSERVATION GOVERNANCE STRATEGIES: HOLISTIC MANAGEMENT OF PROTECTED AREAS IN NEPAL PRABHU BUDHATHOKI A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Greenwich for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. April 2012 DECLARATION I certify that this work has not been accepted in substance for any degree, and is not concurrently being submitted for any degree other than that of Doctor of Philosophy being studied at the University of Greenwich. I also declare that this work is the result of my own investigations except where otherwise identified by references and that I have not plagiarized the work of others. Candidate: Prabhu Budhathoki …………………………………… Supervisor: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • ZSL National Red List of Nepal's Birds Volume 5
    The Status of Nepal's Birds: The National Red List Series Volume 5 Published by: The Zoological Society of London, Regent’s Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK Copyright: ©Zoological Society of London and Contributors 2016. All Rights reserved. The use and reproduction of any part of this publication is welcomed for non-commercial purposes only, provided that the source is acknowledged. ISBN: 978-0-900881-75-6 Citation: Inskipp C., Baral H. S., Phuyal S., Bhatt T. R., Khatiwada M., Inskipp, T, Khatiwada A., Gurung S., Singh P. B., Murray L., Poudyal L. and Amin R. (2016) The status of Nepal's Birds: The national red list series. Zoological Society of London, UK. Keywords: Nepal, biodiversity, threatened species, conservation, birds, Red List. Front Cover Back Cover Otus bakkamoena Aceros nipalensis A pair of Collared Scops Owls; owls are A pair of Rufous-necked Hornbills; species highly threatened especially by persecution Hodgson first described for science Raj Man Singh / Brian Hodgson and sadly now extinct in Nepal. Raj Man Singh / Brian Hodgson The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of participating organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of any participating organizations. Notes on front and back cover design: The watercolours reproduced on the covers and within this book are taken from the notebooks of Brian Houghton Hodgson (1800-1894).
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening the Role of Civil Society and Women in Democracy And
    HARIYO BAN PROGRAM Monitoring and Evaluation Plan 25 November 2011 – 25 August 2016 (Cooperative Agreement No: AID-367-A-11-00003) Submitted to: UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT NEPAL MISSION Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal Submitted by: WWF in partnership with CARE, FECOFUN and NTNC P.O. Box 7660, Baluwatar, Kathmandu, Nepal First approved on April 18, 2013 Updated and approved on January 5, 2015 Updated and approved on July 31, 2015 Updated and approved on August 31, 2015 Updated and approved on January 19, 2016 January 19, 2016 Ms. Judy Oglethorpe Chief of Party, Hariyo Ban Program WWF Nepal Baluwatar, Kathmandu Subject: Approval for revised M&E Plan for the Hariyo Ban Program Reference: Cooperative Agreement # 367-A-11-00003 Dear Judy, This letter is in response to the updated Monitoring and Evaluation Plan (M&E Plan) for the Hariyo Program that you submitted to me on January 14, 2016. I would like to thank WWF and all consortium partners (CARE, NTNC, and FECOFUN) for submitting the updated M&E Plan. The revised M&E Plan is consistent with the approved Annual Work Plan and the Program Description of the Cooperative Agreement (CA). This updated M&E has added/revised/updated targets to systematically align additional earthquake recovery funding added into the award through 8th modification of Hariyo Ban award to WWF to address very unexpected and burning issues, primarily in four Hariyo Ban program districts (Gorkha, Dhading, Rasuwa and Nuwakot) and partly in other districts, due to recent earthquake and associated climatic/environmental challenges. This updated M&E Plan, including its added/revised/updated indicators and targets, will have very good programmatic meaning for the program’s overall performance monitoring process in the future.
    [Show full text]