DOCSLIB.ORG

The Abolition of the Death Penalty and Its Alternative Sanction in Eastern Europe: Belarus, Russia and Ukraine

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Abolition of the Death Penalty and Its Alternative Sanction in Eastern Europe: Belarus, Russia and Ukraine The abolition of the death penalty and its alternative sanction in Eastern Europe: Belarus, Russia and Ukraine www.penalreform.org The abolition of the death penalty and its alternative sanction in Eastern Europe: Belarus, Russia and Ukraine 1 Contents Acknowledgments 2 Acronyms 3 Introduction 4 Research methodology 5 Executive summary 6 Country-by-country analysis Republic of Belarus 8 Russian Federation 26 Ukraine 40 Comparison of the application and implementation of the death penalty and its alternative sanction in Eastern Europe 51 2 Penal Reform International Acknowledgements This research paper has been created by Penal Reform International (PRI). It was written by Viktoria Sergeyeva and Alla Pokras, and edited by Jacqueline Macalesher. This report is based on national research papers prepared by Irina Kuchvalskaya and Vladimir Khomich (Belarus), Oleg Lysyagin (Russia) and Irina Yakovets (Ukraine). This research paper has been produced in conjunction with Penal Reform International’s project “Progressive Abolition of the Death Penalty and Alternatives that Respect International Human Rights Standards” with the financial assistance of the European Union under the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR) as well as the financial assistance of the Government of the United Kingdom (Department for International Development). The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of Penal Reform International and can in no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union or the Government of the United Kingdom. The abolition of the death penalty and its alternative sanction in Eastern Europe: Belarus, Russia and Ukraine 3 Acronyms CAT Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment CPT European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment CRC Convention on the Rights of the Child ECHR European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms EIDHR European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights EU European Union FSIN Federal Service of Execution of Punishments of Russia GA General Assembly ICCPR International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights NGO Non-Governmental Organisation NPM National Preventive Mechanism ODIHR Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights OPCAT Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment OSCE Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe PACE Parliamentary Assembly for the Council of Europe PED Department of Execution of Punishments of the Belarusian Ministry of Internal Affairs PRI Penal Reform International POC Public Oversight Commission (Russia) SPS State Penitentiary Service (Ukraine) TB Tuberculosis UK United Kingdom UN United Nations UPR Universal Periodic Review USA United States of America 4 Penal Reform International Introduction The death penalty is the ultimate cruel, inhuman and This paper takes a country-by-country approach and degrading punishment. It represents an unacceptable focuses on: denial of human dignity and integrity. It is irrevocable, and where criminal justice systems are open to error DD The legal framework of the death penalty and its or discrimination, the death penalty will inevitably be alternative sanction (life imprisonment). inflicted on the innocent. In many countries that retain the death penalty there is a wide scope of application DD Implementation of both sentences, including which does not meet the minimum safeguards, information on fair trial standards. and prisoners on death row are often detained in conditions which cause physical and/or mental DD Application of the sentence, including an analysis suffering. of the method of execution, the prison regime and conditions of imprisonment. The challenges within the criminal justice system do not end with the institution of a moratorium or with DD Statistical information on the application of the abolition. Many countries that institute moratoria death penalty/life imprisonment. do not create humane conditions for prisoners held indefinitely on ‘death row’, or substitute alternative DD Criminal justice reform processes in general. sanctions that amount to torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment, such as life imprisonment This paper provides detailed and practical without the possibility of parole, solitary confinement recommendations tailored to each country to bring it for long and indeterminate periods of time, and in line with international human rights standards and inadequate basic physical or medical provisions. norms. Punitive conditions of detention and less favourable treatment are prevalent for reprieved death row We hope this research paper will assist advocacy prisoners. Such practices fall outside international efforts towards abolition of the death penalty and minimum standards, including those established the implementation of humane alternative sanctions under the EU Guidelines on the Death Penalty. in the region. We hope this paper will be of use to researchers, academics, members of the international This research paper focuses on the application of and donor community, and all other stakeholders the death penalty and its alternative sanction in involved in penal reform processes including three countries of Eastern Europe: the Republic of government officials, parliamentarians, prison officials Belarus, the Russian Federation and Ukraine. Its and members of the judiciary. aim is to provide up-to-date information about the laws and practices relating to the application of the March 2012 death penalty in this region, including an analysis of the alternative sanctions to the death penalty and whether they reflect international human rights standards and norms. The abolition of the death penalty and its alternative sanction in Eastern Europe: Belarus, Russia and Ukraine 5 Research methodology Access to information on the application of the death penalty and its alternative sanction is often unavailable or inaccurate in many countries. Statistical information is not always made available by state bodies, and information provided is not always timely, or lacks clarity. Across the Eastern European region in particular, such information is often classified as a state secret. As such, although PRI aimed to undertake an in-depth analysis of legal, policy and practice areas within the remit of this research paper, access to some information was beyond the abilities of the researchers, and therefore gaps in the research remain. A research questionnaire was designed in late 2010 to assist researchers in identifying relevant information. The research questionnaire was designed by PRI in partnership with Sandra Babcock (Northwestern University, USA) and Dirk van Zyl Smit (Nottingham University, UK). The researchers looked at primary sources, such as legislation and case law, as well as interviewed relevant government officials within the various departments of the Ministries of the Interior, the Ministries of Justice, Constitutional Councils, and the Penitentiary Services, as well as with national human rights commissions/Ombudsmen, lawyers and judges, journalists, and members of civil society/ human rights defenders in all three countries, and with a cross-section of death row and life sentenced prisoners where access was made available. The researchers also turned to reports by individuals or organisations with first-hand experience, such as by inter-governmental organisations including reports by UN treaty bodies, the OSCE and Council of Europe, as well as reports by international NGOs such as Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, Death Penalty Worldwide and the World Coalition against the Death Penalty. Reports and articles by journalists and academics were also analysed. The research was completed in January 2012. 6 Penal Reform International Executive Summary The Eastern European region presents a unique its introduction, and a further 156 death sentences picture of a region in various stages of the abolition have been commuted to life imprisonment. Life process: Ukraine has abolished the death penalty imprisonment does not have a maximum tariff for all crimes in law, Russia is abolitionist in practice, however that sentence may be substituted for and Belarus continues to carry out executions. a definite term of imprisonment after serving a While Belarus and Russia are the last two countries minimum of 20 years in prison. To date no lifers have in Europe to abolish the death penalty in law, it is been paroled since life imprisonment has only been in important to note that both of their constitutions place for the last fifteen years. emphasise the exceptional and temporary nature of this punishment. While Russia retains the death penalty in its Criminal Code for five offences, an official moratorium on both Belarus is the only country in Europe that continues sentencing and executions has been in place since to execute. The last executions took place in March February 1999, when the Constitutional Court found 2012. The death penalty is retained for 14 criminal that the death penalty would be unconstitutional until offences (12 in time of peace and two in time of war). jury-trials were established in all 89 regions of the However, since 1989, it has almost always been Russian Federation. The moratorium was extended applied for aggravated murder. According to the by the State Duma in 2006 until 2010. Chechnya was Ministry of Internal Affairs, between
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Prospects for Democracy in Belarus
    An Eastern Slavic Brotherhood: The Determinative Factors Affecting Democratic Development in Ukraine and Belarus Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Nicholas Hendon Starvaggi, B.A. Graduate Program in Slavic and East European Studies The Ohio State University 2009 Thesis Committee: Trevor Brown, Advisor Goldie Shabad Copyright by Nicholas Hendon Starvaggi 2009 Abstract Following the collapse of the Soviet Union, fifteen successor states emerged as independent nations that began transitions toward democratic governance and a market economy. These efforts have met with various levels of success. Three of these countries have since experienced “color revolutions,” which have been characterized by initial public demonstrations against the old order and a subsequent revision of the rules of the political game. In 2004-2005, these “color revolutions” were greeted by many international observers with optimism for these countries‟ progress toward democracy. In hindsight, however, the term itself needs to be assessed for its accuracy, as the political developments that followed seemed to regress away from democratic goals. In one of these countries, Ukraine, the Orange Revolution has brought about renewed hope in democracy, yet important obstacles remain. Belarus, Ukraine‟s northern neighbor, shares many structural similarities yet has not experienced a “color revolution.” Anti- governmental demonstrations in Minsk in 2006 were met with brutal force that spoiled the opposition‟s hopes of reenacting a similar political outcome to that which Ukraine‟s Orange Coalition was able to achieve in 2004. Through a comparative analysis of these two countries, it is found that the significant factors that prevented a “color revolution” in Belarus are a cohesive national identity that aligns with an authoritarian value system, a lack of engagement with U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The EU and Belarus – a Relationship with Reservations Dr
    BELARUS AND THE EU: FROM ISOLATION TOWARDS COOPERATION EDITED BY DR. HANS-GEORG WIECK AND STEPHAN MALERIUS VILNIUS 2011 UDK 327(476+4) Be-131 BELARUS AND THE EU: FROM ISOLATION TOWARDS COOPERATION Authors: Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck, Dr. Vitali Silitski, Dr. Kai-Olaf Lang, Dr. Martin Koopmann, Andrei Yahorau, Dr. Svetlana Matskevich, Valeri Fadeev, Dr. Andrei Kazakevich, Dr. Mikhail Pastukhou, Leonid Kalitenya, Alexander Chubrik Editors: Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck, Stephan Malerius This is a joint publication of the Centre for European Studies and the Konrad- Adenauer-Stiftung. This publication has received funding from the European Parliament. Sole responsibility for facts or opinions expressed in this publication rests with the authors. The Centre for European Studies, the Konrad-Adenauer- Stiftung and the European Parliament assume no responsibility either for the information contained in the publication or its subsequent use. ISBN 978-609-95320-1-1 © 2011, Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V., Sankt Augustin / Berlin © Front cover photo: Jan Brykczynski CONTENTS 5 | Consultancy PROJECT: BELARUS AND THE EU Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck 13 | BELARUS IN AN INTERnational CONTEXT Dr. Vitali Silitski 22 | THE EU and BELARUS – A Relationship WITH RESERvations Dr. Kai-Olaf Lang, Dr. Martin Koopmann 34 | CIVIL SOCIETY: AN analysis OF THE situation AND diRECTIONS FOR REFORM Andrei Yahorau 53 | Education IN BELARUS: REFORM AND COOPERation WITH THE EU Dr. Svetlana Matskevich 70 | State bodies, CONSTITUTIONAL REALITY AND FORMS OF RULE Valeri Fadeev 79 | JudiciaRY AND law
    [Show full text]
  • POLL: HUMAN RIGHTS RANKED LOW in BELARUS More Belarusians Value the Right to Life and to Free Education Over Rights Such As Freedom of Speech and Free Elections
    POLL: HUMAN RIGHTS RANKED LOW IN BELARUS More Belarusians value the right to life and to free education over rights such as freedom of speech and free elections This memo presents key results of a public opinion poll on Belarusians’ perception of human rights, commissioned by Belarus Helsinki Committee (BHC) and implemented by SATIO. Pact provided technical expertise to BHC in drafting this memo because it believes that the Belarusian human rights sector would benefit from an evidence-based approach to addressing the priority needs of its constituency, while simultaneously creating demand for a wider range of human rights issues. “Recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice, and peace in the world.”1 This is the very first sentence of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which is ratified by all UN member countries, including Belarus. Respect for human rights depends on the willingness of the state to ensure respect for human rights on one hand, and willingness of the people to defend their rights on the other hand. However, in the countries believed to be “not free” according to international measures, for instance, Belarus,2 one cannot rely on political will to ensure human rights protection. In such countries, the readiness of people to stand up for their rights, and the knowledge of tools to protect human rights are critically important. From April to June, 2013, the BHC commissioned a nation-wide representative survey3 on human rights and human rights organizations in Belarus.
    [Show full text]
  • Int Cat Css Blr 30785 E
    The Cost of Speaking Out Overview of human rights abuses committed by Belarusian authorities during peaceful protests in February-March 2017 © Truth Hounds Truth Hounds E [email protected] /facebook.com/truthhounds/ W truth-hounds.org IPHR - International Partnership for Human Rights Square de l'Aviation 7A 1070 Brussels, Belgium E [email protected] @IPHR W IPHRonline.org /facebook.com/iphronline CSP - Civic Solidarity Platform W civicsolidarity.org @CivicSolidarity /facebook.com/SivicSolidarity Crimea SOS E [email protected] /facebook.com/KRYM.SOS/ W krymsos.com Table of contents 1. Introduction and methodology 4 2. Chronological overview of events 5 2.1. February protests against the law on taxing the unemployed 5 2.2. March wave of administrative arrests of civil society activists and journalists 6 2.3. Increasing use of force by law enforcement officials 7 2.4. Criminal and administrative arrests prior to the 25 March Freedom Day protest in Minsk 9 2.5 Ill-treatment, excessive use of force and arbitrary detentions by police on 25 March - Freedom Day in Minsk 10 2.6 Raid of NGO HRC Viasna office and detention of 57 human rights defenders 14 2.7. Further arrests and reprisals by the authorities 14 2.8. Criminal cases related to allegations of attempted armed violence 16 3. Police use of force and arbitrary detentions during assemblies 17 3.1. International standards 17 3.2. Domestic legislation 18 3.2. Structure of the law enforcement services 19 3.4. Patterns of human rights abuses 19 4. Overview of concerns related to violations of freedom of assembly 20 4.1.
    [Show full text]
  • BELARUS Restrictions on the Political and Civil Rights of Citizens Following the 2010 Presidential Election
    BELARUS Restrictions on the Political and Civil Rights of Citizens Following the 2010 Presidential Election of person. Article 4: No one shall be held in slavery Article 1: All human beings are born free and equal or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms. Article 5: No one shall be subjected to in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Article 6: Everyone has the right to recognition spirit of brotherhood. Article 2: Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, everywhere as a person before the law. Article 7: All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimi- without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, nation to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination. Article 8: Everyone has the right to an effective rem- basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person edy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty. by law. Article 9: No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, Article 3: Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security June 2011 564a Uladz Hrydzin © This report has been produced with the support of the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA).
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 22 September 2017
    United Nations A/72/493 General Assembly Distr.: General 22 September 2017 Original: English Seventy-second session Agenda item 72 (c) Promotion and protection of human rights: human rights situations and reports of special rapporteurs and representatives Situation of human rights in Belarus* Note by the Secretary-General The Secretary-General has the honour to transmit to the General Assembly the report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Belarus, Miklós Haraszti, submitted in accordance with Human Rights Council resolution 32/26. * The present report was submitted after the deadline to take into account information received by the Special Rapporteur during his trip to Minsk in July 2017. 17-16691 (E) 031017 *1716691* A/72/493 Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Belarus Summary The present report is submitted by the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Belarus in accordance with Human Rights Council resolution 32/26. The report examines the relationship between the unique features of governance of Belarus and its situation of human rights. It concludes that one of the main structural reasons for both the entrenched systemic abuse of human rights and the cyclical waves of mass repression in the country is that all powers are assumed by the executive branch, chiefly the President and the presidential administration. Although the Constitution provides for the separation of powers and respect for human rights, the reality is a monolithic power structure with laws and governance aimed at maintaining the concentration of powers and an absence of effective human rights guarantees.
    [Show full text]
  • Forced Labor and Pervasive Violations of Workers’ Rights in Belarus
    FORCED LABOR AND PERVASIVE VIOLATIONS OF WORKERS’ RIGHTS IN BELARUS Article 1: All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood. Article 2: Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty. Article 3: Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person. Article 4: No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms. Article 5: No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, December 2013 / N°623a The FIDH and Human Rights Center Viasna Mission The gross, systematic, and widespread violations of political and civil rights in Belarus have been the subject of numerous reports prepared by both international and Belarusian observers. I. INTRODUCTION ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 0HDQZKLOH3UHVLGHQW/XNDVKHQNRDQGJRYHUQPHQWRIÀFLDOVLQJHQHUDODUHXVLQJDQ\IRUXPWKH\FDQ to stress that Belarus is a model of social and economic rights by contrasting the robust guarantees its residents receive with the situation of residents in neighboring countries who suffered a number of II. LABOR AS A CORE VALUE… AND AN UNLIMITED OBLIGATION ------------- 11 economic upheavals folowing the fall of the Soviet Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Hearing on Democracy and Human Rights in Belarus
    House Foreign Affairs Committee Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission Hearing on Democracy and Human Rights in Belarus May 6, 2021- 10:00 a.m. Virtual, via WebEx Statement of David J. Kramer Senior Fellow, Steven J. Green School of International& Public Affairs Florida International University Page 1 of 6 Dear Co-Chair McGovern and Co-Chair Smith, Members of the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission: I’m grateful for this opportunity to appear before you today on an issue near and dear to my heart: democracy and human rights in Belarus. I greatly admired the passion and dedication the late Congressman Tom Lantos had for human rights not just in Belarus but around the world. This Commission is a wonderful tribute to his great and enduring legacy. I’ve also had the privilege of working with both co-chairs back when I served in the U.S. Department of State and when I was president of Freedom House, and it is fitting that the two of you, longstanding and steadfast supporters of human rights, co- chair this commission. Co-Chair Smith, given today’s subject matter, let me pay special tribute to you for your authorship of the Belarus Democracy Act and its various updates. And Co-Chair McGovern, your support for the Magnitsky Act was invaluable. My last visit to Belarus was in 2007, when I was Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs, but I since have followed developments there closely and have been inspired by the determination of the Belarusian people to live in a free society, if given the opportunity.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom in the World, Belarus
    4/30/2020 Belarus | Freedom House FREEDOM IN THE WORLD 2020 Belarus 19 NOT FREE /100 Political Rights 5 /40 Civil Liberties 14 /60 LAST YEAR'S SCORE & STATUS 19 /100 Not Free Global freedom statuses are calculated on a weighted scale. See the methodology. https://freedomhouse.org/country/belarus/freedom-world/2020 1/16 4/30/2020 Belarus | Freedom House Overview Belarus is an authoritarian police state in which elections are openly rigged and civil liberties are curtailed. After permitting limited displays of liberalism during the pursuit of better relations with the European Union (EU) and the United States, the government visibly backtracked to strengthen control over the scarce space for freedom. Key Developments in 2019 Candidates affiliated with President Alyaksandr Lukashenka won every lower- house seat in the November parliamentary election. The two legislators unaffiliated with Lukashenka in the last parliament were kept off the ballot. In March, Marina Zolotoya, editor in chief of independent news site TUT.by, was fined over a 2018 allegation that the outlet illegally accessed the output of state-run wire agency BeITA. In May, authorities arrested over 100 Roma in the city of Mahiliou after a police officer was found dead, though they were released several days later. The head of Lukashenka’s office apologized, but the interior minister denied accusations of xenophobia surrounding the arrests. Political Rights A. Electoral Process A1 0-4 pts Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? 0 / 4 https://freedomhouse.org/country/belarus/freedom-world/2020 2/16 4/30/2020 Belarus | Freedom House The president is elected for five-year terms without limits.
    [Show full text]
  • 14 Activating the 'Human Factor': Do the Roots of Neoliberal
    FORUM FOR ANTHROPOLOGY AND CULTURE, 2018, NO 14 ACTIVATING THE ‘HUMAN FACTOR’: DO THE ROOTS From Fieldwork WrittenFrom to Text OF NEOLIBERAL SUBJECTIVITY LIE IN THE ‘STAGNATION’? Forum Sergei Alymov № 14 2018 From Fieldwork to Written Text Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, Russian Academy of Sciences for Anthropology and Culture and Culture Anthropology for Forum 32a Leninskiy Av., Moscow, Russia Expeditions Reviews Forum Articles Personalia [email protected] 2018 №14 A b s t r a c t: This article examines the ideas of Soviet philosophers and economists of the 1970s and 80s about personality / Soviet man. The author analyses the views of official philosophers of the conservative and liberal camps on the nature of developed socialism. The reformers (A. P. Butenko, A. S. Tsipko) stressed the growth of the significance of the individual in a modern society and economy, connecting the ‘humanisation’ of society with a growth in consumption and the development of the personality. The orthodox (R. I. Kosolapov) cited the definition of labour as the native essence of man given by Marx. In creating the model of Soviet man, they orientated themselves on the image of the industrial worker (G. L. Smirnov). In their opinion his activity was founded on the coincidence of the interests of the personality and society. This concept was attacked by the criticism that it took no account of ‘human nature’. The reformers pointed to the ‘selfish interests of the person’ and activity connected with them as a biological given. The ‘tough’ peasant often figured as a symbol of this. ‘Activating the human factor’ became a topical point on the reformers’ agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Putin's Popularity
    The Popularity of Russian Presidents Why did Boris Yeltsin’s approval rating fall drastically, whereas Vladimir Putin’s surged during his first months and remained at unprecedented heights throughout his presidency? Analyzing time series of presidential approval since 1993, I find that the popularity of each closely followed perceptions of economic performance, which, in turn, reflected objective economic indicators. Perceptions of the political situation contributed, but these were caused in part by economic perceptions. Most other factors invoked by commentators had only marginal, temporary effects. Simulations suggest the sudden improvement in the Russian economy in 1999 would have carried Putin—or another Kremlin candidate—to victory in the 2000 election without any war in Chechnya or terrorist bombings. Had Yeltsin presided over Putin’s economy, simulations suggest he would have been similarly popular. Had Putin been president in the 1990s, his rating would have sunk even lower than Yeltsin’s. Daniel Treisman Department of Political Science University of California, Los Angeles 4289 Bunche Hall Los Angeles California 90095 [email protected] 12 May 2008 Preliminary draft, comments welcome. I thank Tim Frye, Scott Gehlbach, Arnold Harberger, Brian Richter, Richard Rose, and Jeff Timmons for comments. 1 Introduction Since his appointment as prime minister in August 1999, Vladimir Putin has become by far the most popular politician in Russia’s recent history. During his first three months, the share of respondents saying that on the whole they approved of Putin’s performance jumped from 31 to 78 percent. This astronomical rating followed him when, in January 2000, he became acting president.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents and Abstracts
    Экономическая социология. Т. 14. № 4. Сентябрь 2013 www.ecsoc.hse.ru Contents and Abstracts Editor’s Foreword (Vadim Radaev)5 Tatyana I. Zaslavskaya (9 September 1927 — 23 August 2013) �����������������������������������������������������������������������8 Interviews The Russian Professional Sociological Society Needs More Independent Experts Igor Zadorin interviewed by Andrey Yakovlev ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������10 Abstract At the end of 2012 and early 2013, the Higher School of Economics and the Association of Russian Economic Think Tanks (ARETT) conducted a project devoted to modern conditions and trends in the development of think-tanks as a significant segment of independent research in Russia and their roles in the formation of economic policy. An interview with the President of the New Economic Association, Victor Polterovich, carried out within the framework of this project, can be found in the previous volume of Economic Sociology (2013. Vol. 14. No. 3). In-depth interviews with the heads of economic think-tanks and independent economic experts were enriched by several talks with the heads of centres for sociological research, including a conservation with Igor Zadorin, Director General of ZIRCON Research Group. Economic Sociology’s editorial staff is much obliged to Igor Zadorin and Andrey Yakovlev (as team leader of the HSE-ARETT project) for the opportunity to publish the full text of this interview. Keywords: expert community; independent expertise; think tanks; sociological research. New Texts Natalia Firsova Predictors of Innovative Consumption Practices: Internet Shopping Adoption in Russian Households ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������27 Abstract This paper is aimed at answering the question of why some people engage in innovative consumption practices earlier than others, through analysis of Internet shopping predictors.
    [Show full text]