This Document Has Been Prepared to Commemorate the Researchers Who Have Made Great Efforts in Plankton and Related Studies
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
And the Winner Should Be
EDITORIAL And the winner should be… It is time that the tremendous contribution made by Carl Woese to microbiology, medicine and biology as a whole is rewarded by the Nobel committee. Among microbiologists, Carl Woese’s achievements are isolates can allow rapid disease diagnosis. As culturing is well known. His most lauded accomplishments include the not required, sequence analysis can be used to diagnose recognition of an entirely new domain of organisms, many different infectious diseases and is now common in the Archaea1, and the subsequent introduction of the clinical diagnostic laboratories. In the case of Whipple’s three-domain phylogeny2 that is now widely recognized as disease, it even led to the identification of a previously the most accurate reflection of the relatedness of all organ- unknown bacterium (Tropheryma whipplei) as the cause4. isms. We are so used to using neatly organized taxonomic Second, using 16S rRNA-based phylogeny, it is possible to trees to demonstrate the relationships between different study the human microbiota at a detailed level. In recent microorganisms that it is easy to forget that not so long ago years, we have begun to obtain a comprehensive picture the classification of bacteria was considered hopeless. In of the composition of the human-associated microbiota 1963 Roger Stanier, then one of the foremost researchers in various niches, including the gut, skin and oral cavity. in the field of bacterial classification, proclaimed that “The This has led to the insight that shifts in the gut-associated ultimate scientific goal of biological classification cannot microbiota are associated with diseases such as Crohn’s be achieved in the case of bacteria” (REF. -
Mycology from the Library of Nils Fries
CENTRALANTIKVARIATET catalogue 82 MYCOLOGY from the library of nils fries CENTRALANTIKVARIATET catalogue 82 MYCOLOGY from the library of nils fries stockholm mmxvi 15 centralantikvariatet österlånggatan 53 111 31 stockholm +46 8 411 91 36 www.centralantikvariatet.se e-mail: [email protected] bankgiro 585-2389 medlem i svenska antikvariatföreningen member of ilab grafisk form och foto: lars paulsrud tryck: eo grafiska 2016 Vignette on title page from 194 PREFACE It is with great pleasure we are now able to present our Mycology catalogue, with old and rare books, many of them beautifully illustrated, about mushrooms. In addition to being fine mycological books in their own right, they have a great provenance, coming from the libraries of several members of the Fries family – the leading botanist and mycologist family in Sweden. All of the books are from the library of Nils Fries (1912–94), many from that of his grandfather Theodor (Thore) M. Fries (1832–1913), and a few from the library of Nils’ great grandfather Elias M. Fries (1794–1878), “fa- ther of Swedish mycology”. All three were botanists and professors at Uppsala University, as were many other members of the family, often with an orientation towards mycology. Nils Fries field of study was the procreation of mushrooms. Furthermore, Nils Fries has had a partiality for interesting provenances in his purchases – and many international mycologists are found among the former owners of the books in the catalogue. Four of the books are inscribed to Elias M. Fries, and it is probable that more of them come from his collection. Thore M. -
History of the Department of Microbiology 1868 – 2009
June 2015 HISTORY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MICROBIOLOGY 1868 – 2009 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 1 A HISTORY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MICROBIOLOGY 1868 – 2009 This 141 year history of the Department of Microbiology includes an article (Chapter 1), written and published in 1959 by the Department, which covers the period 1868 to 1959. I joined the Department in 1953, and my recounting of the Department’s history includes personal observations as well as anecdotes told to me by H. O. Halvorson and others. Later I realized what a unique experience it had been to join a first-class department, and I resolved to play a role in maintaining its research stature. Ralph Wolfe 2 Department of Microbiology History of the Headship: 1950 – 1959 Halvor Halvorson 1960 – 1963 Kim Atwood 1963 – 1972 Leon Campbell 1972 – 1982 Ralph DeMoss 1982 – 1987 Samuel Kaplan 1987 – 1990 Jordan Konisky 1990 – 1991 Ralph Wolfe (Acting Head) 1991 – 1997 Charles Miller 1997 – 2002 John Cronan 2003 – 2004 Jeffrey Gardner (Acting Head) 2005 – Present John Cronan 3 Organization of the History of the Department In Chapters 2 to 6 the data are divided into Academic Decades, each containing the following sections: Section I, an overview of the decade; Section II, some events for each year of the decade; Section III, a summary of the research interests, honors received, publications, and invited off-campus lectures or seminars for each faculty member. These data have been obtained from the annual reports of the faculty submitted to the departmental secretary. 4 CHAPTER 1 1868 – 1959 During this time period the name of the Department was Department of Bacteriology (Anecdotes by Ralph Wolfe) A SHORT HISTORY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF BACTERIOLOGY H. -
Archief 2017 Commissie Tot Redactie Van Archief En Werken Prof
Archief 2017 Commissie tot redactie van Archief en Werken prof. dr. H. (Henk) Nellen, voorzitter dr. F. (Francien) Petiet, secretaris dr. J.P. (Jan Piet) Bekker drs. I.J. (Ivo) van Loo dr. F.F.X. (Frits) Smulders dr. W. (Willem) Peene M.J (Marianne) Vader, MA drs. G. (Gerrie) Wisse Redactieadres Koninklijk Zeeuwsch Genootschap der Wetenschappen Redactie Archief Kousteensedijk 7 4331 JE Middelburg [email protected] ISSN 0116-594X Archief Mededelingen van het Koninklijk Zeeuwsch Genootschap der Wetenschappen 2017 Hugo Schorer Voorwoord 5 Stefan van Belzen Zeeland onder vuur Organisatie van maritime security door de Staten van Zeeland, 1467–1506 9 Huib J. Zuidervaart ‘Scientia’ in Middelburg rond 1600 De wisselwerking tussen academici, kooplieden en handwerkers in het vroeg- moderne Middelburg: essentieel voor de creatie van ’s werelds eerste verrekijker? 43 Elsbeth Blok-den Braber Vensterglazen, toneel en verzenboeken: het spel van de Veerse rederijkerskamer Missus Scholieren (1681–1796) 101 Jan-Willem de Winter Gehavende steden De krimp van middeleeuwse havensteden in Zeeland 123 Jan de Vetten ‘Bisamratten’. De Communistische Partij van Nederland (CPN) en de Watersnoodramp van 1953 147 Jaarverslag 2017 167 Voorwoord Hugo Schorer VOORWOORD 7 Voor u ligt de editie 2017 van Archief, het jaarboek van het Koninklijk Zeeuwsch Genootschap der Wetenschappen, dat voor het eerst in 1856 verscheen. In Archief 2017 vindt u verschillende boeiende artikelen. Ook doen zoals gebruikelijk onze conservatoren verslag van de vermeldenswaardige gebeurtenissen met betrekking tot onze verzamelingen, zoals aanwinsten, schenkingen, onderzoeken, bruiklenen, etc. Voor de jaarverslagen van de secretaris en van onze commissies en werkgroe- pen mogen wij u in het vervolg verwijzen naar onze recent vernieuwde website, www.kzgw.nl. -
Reader 19 05 19 V75 Timeline Pagination
Plant Trivia TimeLine A Chronology of Plants and People The TimeLine presents world history from a botanical viewpoint. It includes brief stories of plant discovery and use that describe the roles of plants and plant science in human civilization. The Time- Line also provides you as an individual the opportunity to reflect on how the history of human interaction with the plant world has shaped and impacted your own life and heritage. Information included comes from secondary sources and compila- tions, which are cited. The author continues to chart events for the TimeLine and appreciates your critique of the many entries as well as suggestions for additions and improvements to the topics cov- ered. Send comments to planted[at]huntington.org 345 Million. This time marks the beginning of the Mississippian period. Together with the Pennsylvanian which followed (through to 225 million years BP), the two periods consti- BP tute the age of coal - often called the Carboniferous. 136 Million. With deposits from the Cretaceous period we see the first evidence of flower- 5-15 Billion+ 6 December. Carbon (the basis of organic life), oxygen, and other elements ing plants. (Bold, Alexopoulos, & Delevoryas, 1980) were created from hydrogen and helium in the fury of burning supernovae. Having arisen when the stars were formed, the elements of which life is built, and thus we ourselves, 49 Million. The Azolla Event (AE). Hypothetically, Earth experienced a melting of Arctic might be thought of as stardust. (Dauber & Muller, 1996) ice and consequent formation of a layered freshwater ocean which supported massive prolif- eration of the fern Azolla. -
The Charles Knight-Joseph Hooker Correspondence
A man tenax propositi: transcriptions of letters from Charles Knight to William Jackson Hooker and Joseph Dalton Hooker between 1852 and 1883 David J. Galloway Hon. Research Associate Landcare Research, and Te Papa Tongarewa [email protected] Geoscience Society of New Zealand miscellaneous publication 133J December 2013 Published by the Geoscience Society of New Zealand Inc, 2013 Information on the Society and its publications is given at www.gsnz.org.nz © Copyright David J. Galloway, 2013 Geoscience Society of New Zealand miscellaneous publication 133J ISBN 978-1-877480-36-2 ISSN 2230-4495 (Online) ISSN 2230-4487 (Print) This document is available as a PDF file that can be downloaded from the Geoscience Society website at: http://www.gsnz.org.nz/information/misc-series-i-49.html Bibliographic Reference Galloway D.J. 2013: A man tenax propositi: transcriptions of letters from Charles Knight to William Jackson Hooker and Joseph Dalton Hooker between 1852 and 1883 Geoscience Society of New Zealand miscellaneous publication 133J. 88 pages. A man tenax propositi: transcriptions of letters from Charles Knight to William Jackson Hooker and Joseph Dalton Hooker between 1852 and 1883 Contents Introduction 3 Charles Knight correspondence at Kew 5 Acknowledgements 6 Summaries of the letters 7 Transcriptions of the letters from Charles Knight 15 Footnotes 70 References 77 Figure 1: Dr Charles Knight FLS, FRCS 2 Figure 2: Group photograph including Charles Knight 2 Figure 3: Page of letter from Knight to Hooker 14 Table 1: Comparative chronology of Charles Knight, W.J. Hooker and J.D. Hooker 86 1 Figure 1: Dr Charles Knight FLS, FRCS Alexander Turnbull Library,Wellington, New Zealand ¼-015414 Figure 2: Group taken in Walter Mantell‟s garden about 1865 showing Charles Knight (left), John Buchanan and James Hector (right) and Walter Mantell and his young son, Walter Godfrey Mantell (seated on grass). -
Un Estudi Atribueix L'invent Del Telescopi a L'òptic Gironí Joan Roget
Un estudi atribueix l´invent del telescopi a l´òptic gironí Joan Roget Un estudi atribueix l´invent del telescopi a l´òptic gironí Joan Roget Diari de Girona La revista History Today ha publicat un article en el qual es revela que l'inventor del telescopi no va ser l´holandés d´origen alemany Hans Lippershey, com fins ara s´apuntava, sinó que la idea la va tenir un gironí de nom Joan Roget. Aquesta revelació coincideix amb l'any en el qual es compleix el 400 aniversari de l'invent d'aquest aparell. La història porta la firma de Nick Pelling, informàtic, consultor i historiador en potència. Un deixeble de Galileu, Jeroni Sirturo, ja havia atribuit l´invent a Roget. Malgrat que va desenvolupar la seva activitat professional a Girona, el seu nom no surt citat en la premsa gironina dels últims dos-cents anys ni existeix, en principi, documentació sobre un personatge que, de cop i volta, pot convertir-se en famós 400 anys després.El gironí Joan Roget ja havia estat mencionat en alguns estudis i treballs però es tracta d´un personatge poc conegut. Arran d´aquesta tesi que proposa Pelling i que a continuació s´explica, tots nosaltres tindrem present a l`´òptic i inventor gironí del telescopi:Joan Roget. La tesi de Pelling és basa del treball d'un altre català, José María Simón de Guilleuma (1886-1965), que va rastrejar les empremtes fugisseres de Roget i va morir sense completar del tot la seva tasca. La història que planteja Pelling és laberíntica però es llegeix com una novel·la negra. -
Going Through the Motions Some Further Considerations About the Perpetuum Mobile of Cornelis Drebbel, Based on a Manuscript Discovered by Dr
Going through the motions Some further considerations about the perpetuum mobile of Cornelis Drebbel, based on a manuscript discovered by Dr. Alexander Marr by Dr. James M. Bradburne (figures added by F. Franck) London Knowledge Lab, Institute of Education 4 June 2006 The Perpetuum Mobile is not the only invention of Cornelis Drebbel (1572-1633), nor perhaps even the most significant, but it is certainly the one for which he was best known by his contemporaries, and the one of which he remained most proud. It is also the instrument about which most has been written – both by his contemporaries and by modern scholars. What was Drebbel’s famous instrument, how did it actually work, and why was it so important to the late Renaissance court? What can we add to the extensive accounts of Drebbel and his most famous work? Figure 2. PPM by Villard de Honnecourt Figure 1. PPM by Pierre de Maricourt The search for a device that would continue to move by means of its own power dates to Antiquity. Early attempts date as far back as the Archimedes screw, and Arabic sources tell of countless attempts to create perpetual motions using mills and water. The principles commonly used to power perpetual motion machines were often discovered independently of one another, and dissemination fragmentary or discontinuous when it occurred at all. For example, in the 12th century the Indian astronomer and mathematician Bhaskara (1114-1185) described a Perpetuum Mobile made of a wheel with containers attached to its rim, partly filled with mercury. Only a few decades later, in 1235, Villard de Honnecourt described a similar overbalanced wheel with seven hammers attached to its rim. -
Veterinary Parasitology
Andrei Daniel MIHALCA Textbook of Veterinary Parasitology Introduction to parasitology. Protozoology. AcademicPres Andrei D. MIHALCA TEXTBOOK OF VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY Introduction to parasitology Protozoology AcademicPres Cluj-Napoca, 2013 © Copyright 2013 Toate drepturile rezervate. Nici o parte din această lucrare nu poate fi reprodusă sub nici o formă, prin nici un mijloc mecanic sau electronic, sau stocată într-o bază de date, fără acordul prealabil, în scris, al editurii. Descrierea CIP a Bibliotecii Naţionale a României Mihalca Andrei Daniel Textbook of Veterinary Parasitology: Introduction to parasitology; Protozoology / Andrei Daniel Mihalca. Cluj-Napoca: AcademicPres, 2013 Bibliogr. Index ISBN 978-973-744-312-0 339.138 Director editură – Prof. dr. Carmen SOCACIU Referenţi ştiinţifici: Prof. Dr. Vasile COZMA Conf. Dr. Călin GHERMAN Editura AcademicPres Universitatea de Ştiinţe Agricole şi Medicină Veterinară Cluj-Napoca Calea Mănăştur, nr. 3-5, 400372 Cluj-Napoca Tel. 0264-596384 Fax. 0264-593792 E-mail: [email protected] Table of contents 1 INTRODUCTION TO PARASITOLOGY ..................................................................................... 1 1.1 DEFINING PARASITOLOGY. DIVERSITY OF PARASITISM IN NATURE. ................................................. 1 1.2 PARASITISM AS AN INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTION ............................................................................... 2 1.3 AN ECOLOGICAL APPROACH TO PARASITOLOGY ................................................................................... 5 1.4 -
The 'True Inventor'
The ‘true inventor’ of the telescope. A survey of 400 years of debate Huib J. Zuidervaart There is no nation which has not claimed for itself the remarkable invention of the telescope: indeed, the French, Spanish, English, Italians, and Hollanders have all maintained that they did this. Pierre Borel, De vero telescopii inventore (1656) I. introduction Cultural Nationalism and Historical Constructs Who invented the telescope? From the very moment the telescope emerged as a useful tool for extending man’s vision, this seemingly simple question led to a bewildering array of answers. The epigram above, written in the mid- seventeenth century, clearly illustrates this point. Indeed, over the years the ‘invention’ of the telescope has been attributed to at least a dozen ‘inventors,’ from various countries1. And the priority question has remained problematic for four centuries. Even in September 2008, the month in which the 400th anniversary of the ‘invention’ was celebrated in The Netherlands, a new claim was put forward, when the popular monthly History Today published a rather speculative article, in which the author, Nick Pelling, suggested that the hon- our of the invention should nòt go to the Netherlands, but rather to Catalonia on the Iberian Peninsula.2 Pelling’s claim was picked up by the Manchester 1 Over the years the following candidates have been proposed as the ‘inventor of the telescope’: (1) from the Netherlands: Hans Lipperhey, Jacob Adriaensz Metius, Zacharias Jansen and Cornelis Drebbel, to which in this paper – just for the sake of argument – I will add the name ‘Lowys Lowyssen, geseyt Henricxen brilmakers’; (2) from Italy: Girolamo Fracastoro, Raffael Gualterotti, Giovanni Baptista Della Porta and Galileo Galilei; from (3) England: Roger Bacon, Leonard Digges and William Bourne (4) from Germany Jacobus Velser and Simon Marius; (5) from Spain: Juan Roget, and (6) from the Arabian world: Abul Hasan, also known as Abu Ali al-Hasan ibn al-Haith- am. -
Front Matter
Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-08872-6- The Correspondence of Charles Darwin: Volume 22: 1874 Frederick Burkhardt and James A. Secord Frontmatter More information THE CORRESPONDENCE OF CHARLES DARWIN Editors frederick burkhardt james a. secord † samantha evans shelley innes francis neary alison m. pearn anne secord paul white Associate Editors anne schlabach burkhardt † rosemary clarkson andrew corrigan elizabeth smith ruth goldstone muriel palmer © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-08872-6- The Correspondence of Charles Darwin: Volume 22: 1874 Frederick Burkhardt and James A. Secord Frontmatter More information This edition of the Correspondence of Charles Darwin is sponsored by the American Council of Learned Societies. Its preparation is made possible by the co-operation of Cambridge University Library and the American Philosophical Society. The Advisory Committee for the edition, appointed by the Management Board, has the following members: Gillian Beer Tim Birkhead Janet Browne Sibyl R. Golden Daniel Grossman Sandra Herbert Mandy Hill Randal Keynes Simon Keynes Gene Kritsky John Parker Support for editing has been received from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, the Arts and Humanities Research Coun- cil, the British Academy, the British Ecological Society, the Evolution Education Trust, the Isaac Newton Trust, the John Templeton Foundation, the National Endowment for the Humanities, the National Science Foundation, the Natural Environment Research Council, the Pew Charitable Trusts, the Royal Society of London, the Stifterverband für die Deutsche Wissenschaft, and the Wellcome Trust. The National Endowment for the Humanities funding of the work was under grants nos. -
William Colenso Early Influences.Pdf
1 Introduction After William Colenso died the Royal Society published an obituary that included the following comment: “From the date of his arrival in New Zealand Mr. Colenso took an active interest in the history, folk- lore, habits, languages, &c., of the natives, and being gifted with the love of natural history and of travel, a cultivated mind, an iron constitution, and methodical habits as an observer, collector, and recorder, all of which he used to the best advantage during a long life, it is not surprising that he was regarded as the Nestor of science in a colony in which his arrival antedated its foundation.” The listed attributes imply an educated man – a scientist. This is a contrast with his biographers’ accounts of his early life. In his book “The Controversial Colensos”, the Cornish historian A L Rowse summed up William’s education as an apprenticeship as a printer and bookbinder for 7 years from the age of 15 (i.e. 5 September 1826 to 1833). During this time he developed his hobby of botany and became a youthful member of the Penzance Natural History and Antiquarian Society. Rowse described him as “as largely self-educated as a printer; he was intelligent and not ill-read”. Rowse mentioned that the Cornish missionary Henry Martyn (1781-1812) may have had an influence on the aspirations of William and his cousin John William, the future Bishop of Natal, but he made no mention of the scientific influences in William’s home town of Penzance, particularly during his formative years between 1816 and 1833.