DOCSLIB.ORG

GREAT BIOLOGISTS of the WORLD

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GREAT BIOLOGISTS of the WORLD Biology Series-1 (English) GREAT BIOLOGISTS of THE WORLD Collected & Edited by Assisted by Prof. Sunil D. Purohit Dr. Renu Tripathi Published by Society for Promotion of Science Education and Research 11-12, New Ganpati Nagar-A, Bohra Ganesh Marg, Udaipur (Rajasthan) N ISSIO D MI N AN VIS IO Promong Excellence in Science Educaon and Research Through Sciencezaon (Science S e n s i z a o n ) , S u p p o r v e Teaching, Conceptual and Pracce Learning and Training as a part of Academic Social Responsibility Program (ASRP) SPSER SPSER Published by Society for Promotion of Science Education and Research 11-12, New Ganpati Nagar-A, Bohra Ganesh Marg, Udaipur-313001 (Rajasthan) e-mail : [email protected] First Edition : 2019 Printed by : Apex Printing House Contribution Amount: Rs. 10.00 only Great Biologists of the World 40 GREAT BIOLOGISTS OF THE WORLD Collected and Edited by Professor Sunil Dutta Purohit Former Head, Department of Botany Mohanlal Sukhadia University, Udaipur (Raj.) Assisted by Dr. Renu Tripathi (Sukhwal) New Middle East International School, Riyadh Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Financial Support Dr. Renu-Sunil Dutt Tripathi Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Published by Society for Promotion of Science Education and Research 11-12, New Ganpati Nagar-A, Bohra Ganesh Marg, Udaipur (Rajasthan) Great Biologists of the World 41 CONTENTS 1. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 1 2. Robert Hooke 4 3. Carolus Linnaeus 8 4. Edward Jenner 12 5. Charles Darwin 16 6. Louis Pasteur 20 7. Gregor Mendel 24 8. Robert Koch 28 9. Alexander Fleming 32 10. Max Delbruck 35 1 Antonie van Leeuwenhoek Father of Microbiology Antonie van Leeuwenhoek is known as Father of Microbiology. Leeuwenhoek for the first time demonstrated the presence of microorganisms in the environment which could not be seen with the naked eyes.With the help of microscopes created by him, he observed in different water samples, the presence of tiny motile objects which he designated them as ‘Animalcules’. These tiny objects turned out to be Bacteria as we know them today. Leeuwenhoek with this discovery opened up altogether a new area of scientific investigation which had great impact on human civilization. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek was born on October 24, 1632 in a picturesque old town of Delft in Holland. His father was a basket maker and mother, the daughter of a brewer. Leeuwenhoek earned his livelihood as a cloth merchant and it was common for him to use small lenses to check the quality of clothes that he used to sell as draper. Rare sense of his curiosity in observing other objects through his lenses opened up a new area of scientific enquiry for him. He spent lot of his spare time constructing simple microscopes composed of double convex lenses held between two silver plates. Leeuwenhoek not only recorded every minute detail of his observations but also sent detailed letters to Great Biologists of the World 2 the Royal Society of London, describing his observations. There were a record 372 letters in all, written by Leeuwenhoek throughout his long life of ninety years. The last letter of Leeuwenhoek was mailed by her daughter after his death along with a cabinet containing 26 of his finest and most beloved silver microscopes. It was clear from his descriptions that he saw both bacteria and protozoa. He is believed to have created about 400 microscopes, of which, 7 are still present in the Natural History Museum of London. Discovery of microorganisms by Leeuwenhoek ended the long held myth that life spontaneously appeared from the non- living organisms. This further solved the mystery and confirmed that spoilage of the food, making of wine and turning milk into cheese involved microorganisms. It is interesting to note that Leeuwenhoek had a very little knowledge on how to present his scientific observations. This was reflected in the series of his letters written to the Royal Society of London. The letters were written in colloquial Dutch and often began with some simple talk about life in Delft, or his personal habits, his pet dog, or his business upturns and downturns, and then moved on to describing an amazing variety of microscopic observations. His scientific observations were made with painstaking care and exactness and this approach made him the most respected microscopist in the world. Leeuwenhoek had said “My work, which I have done for a long time, was not pursued in order to gain the praise I now enjoy, but chiefly from a craving after knowledge, which I notice resides in me more than in most other men”. The Royal Society of London, in the year 1680 conferred on him the membership of the society which was a rare honor for a person who did not have a formal scientific training! He became famous and a stream of visitors started pouring in his home, Great Biologists of the World 3 some time leading to loss of his privacy and causing discomfiture to him. One day Peter the Great, the Emperor of Russia called on him to see his instruments. He had to carry his instruments to a Yacht by which the Emperor had come through a canal, and he did not want to attract crowd by visiting the home of Leeuwenhoek. Leeuwenhoek was very secretive in nature and was not willing to share the art of making microscopes to anyone during his lifetime. He passed away in the year 1723. Leeuwenhoek will be remembered for astounding and detailed nature of his discoveries which revolutionized our lives in more than several ways. Great Biologists of the World 4 2 Robert Hooke A Natural Philosopher who Discovered Cell Robert Hooke was a noted natural scientist who made variety of observations on natural world. He is known as ‘Renaissance Man’ of 17th Century England for his work in sciences which covered areas such as Philosophy, Architecture, Chemistry, Astronomy, Physics and Biology including construction of scientific instruments. His most notable discovery was about cells, a term which he coined for microscopic honeycomb cavities in sliced cork. He was a true polymath who studied comets, the motion of light, the rotation of Jupiter, gravity, human memories and the properties of air. He invented or improved all the five meteorological instruments such as Barometer, Thermometer, Hydroscope, Rain Gauge and Wind Gauge. He developed and printed a form to record weather data. Hooke explained the basis of the phenomenon of elasticity known as Hooke’s Law. Robert Hooke was born on July 18, 1635 at Freshwater on the Isle of Wight, Hampshire in England. His father John Hooke was a priest of England and the Curate of Freshwater’s Church of All Saints. His mother Cecily Glyles was second wife of his father. Hooke was educated mostly at home during his early years due to ill health. He was a quick learner and had Great Biologists of the World 5 great interest in painting and making of mechanical toys and models. Unfortunately, his father passed away in 1748 when Hooke was only 13 years old. His father left a meager 40 Pound Sterling (INR 3500) as inheritance. With this amount in hand he went to London and was first apprenticed to painter Peter Lely and Samuel Cowper and proved fairly good at art, but he left because the fumes of the paint adversely affected his health. He enrolled at the Westminster School in London, where he received a solid academic education including Latin, Greek and Hebrew and also gained training as an instrument maker. After graduating from Westminster School, Robert Hooke took admission in Christ Church College of the University of Oxford. He studied experimental science here. In 1655, at 20 years of age, Robert Hooke became an assistant to a well known chemist Robert Boyle. He was working with Boyle when he discovered Boyle’s Law and helped him in construction and operation of Boyle’s Air-Pump. He worked with Boyle for seven consecutive years till 1762, after which he was appointed as the curator of experiments for the Royal Society of London. He held this position for 40 years. Initially the Royal Society of London was not in a position to pay anything to him for the Curator’s position. Hooke eventually got paid for the curatorship when he was appointed as a professor of Geometry at Gresham College in London in the year 1665. While he was already working with Boyle, he also came in contact with an eminent architect Christopher Wren, natural philosopher John Wilkins and Isaac Newton who were also associated with the society. Hooke became Fellow of the Society in the year 1663. In 1665, he published his famous book ‘Micrographia’ (meaning- Small drawings) in which he documented the observations he had made through various lenses of a microscope Great Biologists of the World 6 in a period of about nine months. It featured many drawings, such as that of a detailed flea and a slice of cork observed through the microscope. Hooke was the first person to use the word ‘Cell’ to identify microscopic structures when he was describing cork. The word ‘Cell’ for these structures came to his mind due to its resemblance to cells inhabited by Christian Monks in a Monastery. It is considered to be one of the most important scientific books ever written, which became a bestseller during that time. In the year 1670s he postulated that gravitational pull applies to all celestial bodies. He stated that it decreases with distance and in its absence the body would tend to move in a straight line. He could not give any evidence for this hypothesis. In the year 1678 publication of Hooke’s ‘Lectures of Spring’ shared his theory of elasticity which later on came to be known as Hooke’s Law.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aristotle's Essentialism Revisited
    University of Missouri, St. Louis IRL @ UMSL Theses Graduate Works 4-15-2013 Accommodating Species Evolution: Aristotle’s Essentialism Revisited Yin Zhang University of Missouri-St. Louis, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://irl.umsl.edu/thesis Recommended Citation Zhang, Yin, "Accommodating Species Evolution: Aristotle’s Essentialism Revisited" (2013). Theses. 192. http://irl.umsl.edu/thesis/192 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Works at IRL @ UMSL. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of IRL @ UMSL. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Accommodating Species Evolution: Aristotle’s Essentialism Revisited by Yin Zhang B.A., Philosophy, Peking University, 2010 A Thesis Submitted to The Graduate School at the University of Missouri – St. Louis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in Philosophy May 2013 Advisory Committee Jon D. McGinnis, Ph.D. Chairperson Andrew G. Black, Ph.D. Berit O. Brogaard, Ph.D. Zhang, Yin, UMSL, 2013, p. i PREFACE In the fall of 2008 when I was a junior at Peking University, I attended a lecture series directed by Dr. Melville Y. Stewart on science and religion. Guest lecturers Dr. Alvin Plantinga, Dr. William L. Craig and Dr. Bruce Reichenbach have influenced my thinking on the relation between evolution and faith. In the fall of 2010 when I became a one-year visiting student at Calvin College in Michigan, I took a seminar directed by Dr. Kelly J. Clark on evolution and ethics. Having thought about evolution/faith and evolution/ethics, I signed up for Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scientist from a Flourishing Sex-Life to Modern DNA Technology
    The Scientist From a Flourishing Sex-life to Modern DNA Technology Linnaeus the Scientist ll of a sudden you are standing there, in the bo- tanic garden that is to be Linnaeus’s base for a whole lifetime of scientific achievements. It is a beautiful spring day in Uppsala, the sun’s rays warm your heart as cheerfully as in your own 21st century. The hus- tle and bustle of the town around you break into the cen- trally located garden. Carriage wheels rattle over the cob- blestones, horses neigh, hens cackle from the house yards. The acrid smell of manure and privies bears witness to a town atmosphere very different from your own. You cast a glance at what is growing in the garden. The beds do not look particularly well kept. In fact, the whole garden gives a somewhat dilapidated impression. Suddenly, in the distance, you see a young man squat- A ting down by one of the beds. He is looking with great concentration at a small flower, examining it closely through a magnifying glass. When he lifts his head for a moment and ponders, you recognise him at once. It is Carl von Linné, or Carl Linnaeus as he was originally called. He looks very young, just over 20 years old. His pale cheeks tell you that it has been a harsh winter. His first year as a university student at Uppsala has been marked by a lack of money for both food and clothes as well as for wood to warm his rented room. 26 linnaean lessons • www.bioresurs.uu.se © 2007 Swedish Centre for School Biology and Biotechnology, Uppsala University, Sweden.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Dahlia Myths.Pub
    Cavanilles’ detailed illustrations established the dahlia in the botanical taxonomy In 1796, the third volume of “Icones” introduced two more dahlia species, named D. coccinea and D. rosea. They also were initially thought to be sunflowers and had been brought to Spain as part of the Alejandro Malaspina/Luis Neé expedition. More than 600 drawings brought the plant collection to light. Cavanilles, whose extensive correspondence included many of Europe’s leading botanists, began to develop a following far greater than his title of “sacerdote” (priest, in French Abbé) ever would have offered. The A. J. Cavanilles archives of the present‐day Royal Botanical Garden hold the botanist’s sizable oeu‐ vre, along with moren tha 1,300 letters, many dissertations, studies, and drawings. In time, Cavanilles achieved another goal: in 1801, he was finally appointed professor and director of the garden. Regrettably, he died in Madrid on May 10, 1804. The Cavanillesia, a tree from Central America, was later named for this famousMaterial Spanish scientist. ANDERS DAHL The lives of Dahl and his Spanish ‘godfather’ could not have been any more different. Born March 17,1751, in Varnhem town (Västergötland), this Swedish botanist struggled with health and financial hardship throughout his short life. While attending school in Skara, he and several teenage friends with scientific bent founded the “Swedish Topographic Society of Skara” and sought to catalogue the natural world of their community. With his preacher father’s support, the young Dahl enrolled on April 3, 1770, at Uppsala University in medicine, and he soon became one of Carl Linnaeus’ students.
    [Show full text]
  • And the Winner Should Be
    EDITORIAL And the winner should be… It is time that the tremendous contribution made by Carl Woese to microbiology, medicine and biology as a whole is rewarded by the Nobel committee. Among microbiologists, Carl Woese’s achievements are isolates can allow rapid disease diagnosis. As culturing is well known. His most lauded accomplishments include the not required, sequence analysis can be used to diagnose recognition of an entirely new domain of organisms, many different infectious diseases and is now common in the Archaea1, and the subsequent introduction of the clinical diagnostic laboratories. In the case of Whipple’s three-domain phylogeny2 that is now widely recognized as disease, it even led to the identification of a previously the most accurate reflection of the relatedness of all organ- unknown bacterium (Tropheryma whipplei) as the cause4. isms. We are so used to using neatly organized taxonomic Second, using 16S rRNA-based phylogeny, it is possible to trees to demonstrate the relationships between different study the human microbiota at a detailed level. In recent microorganisms that it is easy to forget that not so long ago years, we have begun to obtain a comprehensive picture the classification of bacteria was considered hopeless. In of the composition of the human-associated microbiota 1963 Roger Stanier, then one of the foremost researchers in various niches, including the gut, skin and oral cavity. in the field of bacterial classification, proclaimed that “The This has led to the insight that shifts in the gut-associated ultimate scientific goal of biological classification cannot microbiota are associated with diseases such as Crohn’s be achieved in the case of bacteria” (REF.
    [Show full text]
  • Instr Uct Or's Guide Science
    Scientists Of The Past SCIENCE Lesson Objectives • Students will compare and contrast how the rules of society restricted the progress of science in the past. • Students will list several famous scientists from history. Activities Checklist In this lesson, the student will • Watch the instructional video about how the rules of society restricted the progress of science in the past and the scientists who, over time, were able to break away from these restrictions • Interact with My Book and learn about how the rules of society restricted the progress of science in the past • Complete the crossword puzzle, in the Science Activities Workbook, by determining the scientist who made each cited discovery • Complete all learning activities assessing understanding of the sequence of scientifi c events and discoveries Video Summary Students are given a modern-day scenario of reading something aloud in front of the classroom to better understand the stress scientists felt during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, when they were presenting new scientifi c theories to society. Scientists of the past were not always respected. Sometimes publicly voicing their scientifi c opinions could result in jail, exile, or even death. Religion determined what could or could not be accepted as explanations and discoveries. When a scientist would come up with a new explanation for why something occurred in nature, he or she would often have to argue the claim against the church -- and the church always won. After many, many years, the scientifi c community was able to break away from the church, resulting in numerous scientifi c endeavors. Some of the most famous scientists include Anton van Leeuwenhoek (improved the microscope), Carl Linnaeus (developed the classifi cation of life on Earth), Charles Darwin (developed the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection), and Albert Einstein (worked within mathematics, GUIDE INSTRUCTOR’S physics, and astronomy).
    [Show full text]
  • Linnaeus at Home
    NATURE-BASED ACTIVITIES FOR PARENTS LINNAEUS 1 AT HOME A GuiDE TO EXPLORING NATURE WITH CHILDREN Acknowledgements Written by Joe Burton Inspired by Carl Linnaeus With thanks to editors and reviewers: LINNAEUS Lyn Baber, Melissa Balzano, Jane Banham, Sarah Black, Isabelle Charmantier, Mark Chase, Maarten Christenhusz, Alex Davey, Gareth Dauley, AT HOME Zia Forrai, Jon Hale, Simon Hiscock, Alice ter Meulen, Lynn Parker, Elizabeth Rollinson, James Rosindell, Daryl Stenvoll-Wells, Ross Ziegelmeier Share your explorations @LinneanLearning #LinnaeusAtHome Facing page: Carl Linnaeus paper doll, illustrated in 1953. © Linnean Society of London 2019 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrival system or trasmitted in any form or by any means without the prior consent of the copyright owner. www.linnean.org/learning “If you do not know Introduction the names of things, the knowledge of them is Who was Carl Linnaeus? Contents Pitfall traps 5 lost too” Carl Linnaeus was one of the most influential scientists in the world, - Carl Linnaeus A bust of ‘The Young Linnaeus’ by but you might not know a lot about him. Thanks to Linnaeus, we Bug hunting 9 Anthony Smith (2007). have a naming system for all species so that we can understand how different species are related and can start to learn about the origins Plant hunting 13 of life on Earth. Pond dipping 17 As a young man, Linnaeus would study the animals, plants, Bird feeders 21 minerals and habitats around him. By watching the natural world, he began to understand that all living things are adapted to their Squirrel feeders 25 environments and that they can be grouped together by their characteristics (like animals with backbones, or plants that produce Friendly spaces 29 spores).
    [Show full text]
  • Names of Botanical Genera Inspired by Mythology
    Names of botanical genera inspired by mythology Iliana Ilieva * University of Forestry, Sofia, Bulgaria. GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2021, 14(03), 008–018 Publication history: Received on 16 January 2021; revised on 15 February 2021; accepted on 17 February 2021 Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2021.14.3.0050 Abstract The present article is a part of the project "Linguistic structure of binomial botanical denominations". It explores the denominations of botanical genera that originate from the names of different mythological characters – deities, heroes as well as some gods’ attributes. The examined names are picked based on “Conspectus of the Bulgarian vascular flora”, Sofia, 2012. The names of the plants are arranged in alphabetical order. Beside each Latin name is indicated its English common name and the family that the particular genus belongs to. The article examines the etymology of each name, adding a short account of the myth based on which the name itself is created. An index of ancient authors at the end of the article includes the writers whose works have been used to clarify the etymology of botanical genera names. Keywords: Botanical genera names; Etymology; Mythology 1. Introduction The present research is a part of the larger project "Linguistic structure of binomial botanical denominations", based on “Conspectus of the Bulgarian vascular flora”, Sofia, 2012 [1]. The article deals with the botanical genera appellations that originate from the names of different mythological figures – deities, heroes as well as some gods’ attributes. According to ICBN (International Code of Botanical Nomenclature), "The name of a genus is a noun in the nominative singular, or a word treated as such, and is written with an initial capital letter (see Art.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Mammals Are Called Mammals: Gender Politics in Eighteenth-Century Natural History Author(S): Londa Schiebinger Source: the American Historical Review, Vol
    Why Mammals are Called Mammals: Gender Politics in Eighteenth-Century Natural History Author(s): Londa Schiebinger Source: The American Historical Review, Vol. 98, No. 2 (Apr., 1993), pp. 382-411 Published by: American Historical Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2166840 Accessed: 22/01/2010 10:27 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=aha. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. American Historical Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The American Historical Review. http://www.jstor.org Why Mammals Are Called Mammals: Gender Politics in Eighteenth-Century Natural History LONDA SCHIEBINGER IN 1758, IN THE TENTH EDITION OF HIS Systema naturae, Carolus Linnaeus introduced the term Mammaliainto zoological taxonomy.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Department of Microbiology 1868 – 2009
    June 2015 HISTORY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MICROBIOLOGY 1868 – 2009 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 1 A HISTORY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MICROBIOLOGY 1868 – 2009 This 141 year history of the Department of Microbiology includes an article (Chapter 1), written and published in 1959 by the Department, which covers the period 1868 to 1959. I joined the Department in 1953, and my recounting of the Department’s history includes personal observations as well as anecdotes told to me by H. O. Halvorson and others. Later I realized what a unique experience it had been to join a first-class department, and I resolved to play a role in maintaining its research stature. Ralph Wolfe 2 Department of Microbiology History of the Headship: 1950 – 1959 Halvor Halvorson 1960 – 1963 Kim Atwood 1963 – 1972 Leon Campbell 1972 – 1982 Ralph DeMoss 1982 – 1987 Samuel Kaplan 1987 – 1990 Jordan Konisky 1990 – 1991 Ralph Wolfe (Acting Head) 1991 – 1997 Charles Miller 1997 – 2002 John Cronan 2003 – 2004 Jeffrey Gardner (Acting Head) 2005 – Present John Cronan 3 Organization of the History of the Department In Chapters 2 to 6 the data are divided into Academic Decades, each containing the following sections: Section I, an overview of the decade; Section II, some events for each year of the decade; Section III, a summary of the research interests, honors received, publications, and invited off-campus lectures or seminars for each faculty member. These data have been obtained from the annual reports of the faculty submitted to the departmental secretary. 4 CHAPTER 1 1868 – 1959 During this time period the name of the Department was Department of Bacteriology (Anecdotes by Ralph Wolfe) A SHORT HISTORY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF BACTERIOLOGY H.
    [Show full text]
  • PISA Style Scientific Literacy Question on the Origin of Species
    PISA Style Scientific Literacy Question On the Origin of Species – Text 1 Read the following extract from Charles Darwin’s book ‘On the Origin of Species’ ‘Can it then be thought improbable, seeing that variations useful to man have undoubtedly occurred, that other variations useful in some way to each being in the great and complex battle of life, should sometimes occur in the course of thousands of generations? If such do occur, can we doubt (remembering that many more individuals are born than can possibly survive) that individuals having an advantage, however slight, over others, would have the best chance of surviving and procreating their kind? On the other hand, we may feel that any variation in the least degree injurious would be rigidly destroyed’. Question 1 : ON THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES In this piece of text, Darwin is explaining his theory of evolution. He called this A Natural Selection B Adaptation C Inheritance D Variation Question 2 : ON THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES At the time, Darwin’s theory was not widely accepted. Which of the reasons below would explain why people did not support his idea? Reason why people did not support Darwin’s theory Yes or No ? There was little scientific evidence to support his theory Yes / No The theory of creationism as taught by the church was widely Yes / No believed and accepted People did not know about Darwin’s theory because there was no Yes / No radio or television Other scientists had come up with similar theories to Darwin Yes / No Question 3 : ON THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES Mali says that the theory of natural selection as described by Darwin in the text does not apply so well for humans.
    [Show full text]
  • Father of Modern Taxonomy Carl Linnaeus
    The roots of evolutionary History of Evolutionary Thought thinking Learning objectives: 2008 will mark the 150th anniversary 1. To describe major historical events and of the reading of addresses on the theory of key contributors to the development of Aristotle the theory of evolution. evolution by natural selection by Wallace and Darwin, but the roots of evolutionary thinking 384-322 BC 2. To outline the key components of Darwin’s are usually traced back to the Greek philosopher theory of evolution by natural selection. Aristotle. Aristotle developed the idea of a natural order “Scala Readings: Your text does not cover this topic (except naturae”, in which all forms of life were linked in a for box 2.1 and scattered parts of Ch. 2). “chain of being”. However, the people and events mentioned have Aristotle thought of species as unchanging and Wikipedia entries. reflecting a divine order. 336-2 1 336-2 2 Carl Linnaeus: father of Carl Linnaeus: father of modern taxonomy modern taxonomy Linnaeus is credited with developing the binomial Linnaeus recognized that individuals within a nomenclature system, in which each species name Linnaeus Linnaeus 1707-1778 species are capable of interbreeding, while 1707-1778 has two parts individuals in different species could not interbreed. Genus name + specific epithet = species name Linnaeus believed in the ‘balance of nature’, with each Cucurbita pepo = cultivated pumpkin species having a place in the divine plan. Species do Homo sapiens = modern human not change or go extinct. Later in life, Linnaeus acknowledged that new species Linnaeus also saw species as nested within broader could be formed by hybridization (by crossing groups, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Veterinary Parasitology
    Andrei Daniel MIHALCA Textbook of Veterinary Parasitology Introduction to parasitology. Protozoology. AcademicPres Andrei D. MIHALCA TEXTBOOK OF VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY Introduction to parasitology Protozoology AcademicPres Cluj-Napoca, 2013 © Copyright 2013 Toate drepturile rezervate. Nici o parte din această lucrare nu poate fi reprodusă sub nici o formă, prin nici un mijloc mecanic sau electronic, sau stocată într-o bază de date, fără acordul prealabil, în scris, al editurii. Descrierea CIP a Bibliotecii Naţionale a României Mihalca Andrei Daniel Textbook of Veterinary Parasitology: Introduction to parasitology; Protozoology / Andrei Daniel Mihalca. Cluj-Napoca: AcademicPres, 2013 Bibliogr. Index ISBN 978-973-744-312-0 339.138 Director editură – Prof. dr. Carmen SOCACIU Referenţi ştiinţifici: Prof. Dr. Vasile COZMA Conf. Dr. Călin GHERMAN Editura AcademicPres Universitatea de Ştiinţe Agricole şi Medicină Veterinară Cluj-Napoca Calea Mănăştur, nr. 3-5, 400372 Cluj-Napoca Tel. 0264-596384 Fax. 0264-593792 E-mail: [email protected] Table of contents 1 INTRODUCTION TO PARASITOLOGY ..................................................................................... 1 1.1 DEFINING PARASITOLOGY. DIVERSITY OF PARASITISM IN NATURE. ................................................. 1 1.2 PARASITISM AS AN INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTION ............................................................................... 2 1.3 AN ECOLOGICAL APPROACH TO PARASITOLOGY ................................................................................... 5 1.4
    [Show full text]