DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Program Abstract

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

HAWAI‘I CONSERVATION CONFERENCE AT A GLANCE Thursday Room 313B/C Plenary Oli by Samuel ‘Ohukani‘ōhi‘a Gon III 8:30 AM Carson Dedication by Steiner McClain, Zedler, Conry, Liebherr 10:45 AM Morning Break - 20 minutes Room 313 B/C Room 313 A Symposium 1: Typhoons and Ecosystems Session 1: Native and Invasive Invertebrates 11:05 AM Cormier (moderator), Kauffman, Kauffman, Miller (moderator), Foote, Schuurman, MacKenzie, Cormier, Robinson Schwarzfeld, Costello, Leblanc* 12:20 PM Lunch - 1 hour 10 minutes Session 2: Native Plants Session 3: Native Vertebrates 1:30 PM Puttock (moderator), Papineau, Scowcroft, Marshall (moderator), Farmer, Kuntz, Tweed, Meason*, Thaxton, Rivers, Durand Reynolds, Zaun, Uyehara* 3:00 PM Afternoon Break - 30 minutes Session 4: Invasive Plants Session 5: Management 3:30 PM Lane-Kamahele (moderator), Leary*, Benitez, Kennedy (moderator), Kinney, Haysmith, Ainsworth, Loh, Johnson, Penniman Goldstein*, Pejchar, Pongkijivorasin*, James 5:00 PM Posters Presentation and Pupus – Room 312 Friday Room 313 B/C Room 313 A Symposium 2: Paleoecology and Conservation 8:30 AM Price (moderator), Hotchkiss, James, Burney, Workshop: Rare Plant Recovery Burney Bruegmann (moderator), Caraway (moderator), Symposium 3: New Models and Maps Bakutis, Kier, Cordell, Hadway 9:55 AM Jacobi (moderator), Jacobi 10:10 AM Morning Break – 20 minutes Symposium 3 (continued): New Models & Maps Symposium 4: Offshore Islets Restoration 10:30 AM Jacobi (moderator), Matsuwaki, Siddiqui, Price, Smith (moderator), Swenson, Howald, Kessler, Laut, Hood, Gon Plentovich, Vanderwerf, Wood NOON Awards Lunch - 1 hour 30 minutes Session 6: Landscapes Session 7: Marine, Aquatic, Coastal 1:30 PM Rowland (moderator), Rutledge, Donoho, Wada (moderator), Walsh, Wagner, Kido, Higashino, Miura, Miller, Mitchell Erickson, Bourke, Iwai 3:00 PM Afternoon Break - 20 minutes Symposium 5: Lowland Wet Forests Session 8: Invasive Vertebrates 3:20 PM Cordell (moderator), Gon, Hughes, Hart, Erickson (moderator), Goltz, Hess, Scheffler, Ostertag, Bender, Menard Rubenstein, Beard, Stanford Summary Session – Room 313 B/C 4:50 PM Comments and Summary by HCA Coordinator Dr. Christopher F. Puttock Oli by Samuel ‘Ohukani‘ōhi‘a Gon III 5:15 PM Dinner Break -2 hours 15 minutes Public Presentation - Room 313 B/C 7:30 PM Susan Middleton *Best Student Presentation Award Competition Hawai‘i’s Restoration Efforts TABLE OF CONTENTS THE 2005 HAWAI‘I CONSERVATION CONFERENCE……………………………………………...… 2 CONFERENCE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………………………………………………………………. 3 REGISTRATION AND MEETING ROOMS AT THE HAWAI‘I CONVENTION CENTER ………….. 4 HAWAI‘I CONVENTION CENTER FLOOR PLAN……………………………………………………... 5 DINING OUT IN WAIKIKI………………………………………………………………………………... 6 HAWAI‘I CONSERVATION CONFERENCE DEDICATION TO DR. HAMPTON CARSON………… 7 PLENARY KEYNOTE SPEAKER BIOGRAPHY: DR. JOY ZEDLER……………………………….... 10 DISTINGUISHED SERVICE AWARDS…………………………………………………….……….….. 12 HAWAI‘I-NEW ZEALAND CONSERVATION EXCHANGE PROGRAM……………………………. 16 FRIDAY EVENING PUBLIC PRESENTATION: NORTHWEST HAWAIIAN ISLANDS: A VISUAL JOURNEY BY MS. SUSAN MIDDLETON….… 18 HAWAI‘I CONSERVATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULE……………………………………….…… 19 POSTER TITLES AND LOCATION NUMBER………………………………………………………… 27 EXHIBITOR DESCRIPTIONS AND LOCATION NUMBERS………………………………………… 35 MAP OF NI‘IHAU ROOM 312: POSTERS ANDEXHIBITORS……………………………………..…. 36 ABSTRACTS OF THE SYMPOSIA AND THE WORKSHOP…………………………………..……… 37 PRESENTERS AND ABSTRACTS FOR THE PLENARY SESSION, THE SYMPOSIA, THE CONCURRENT SESSIONS AND THE POSTERS…………………………… 39 LIST OF REGISTERED CONFERENCE PARTICIPANTS………………………………………...…. 103 2005 Hawai‘i Conservation Conference Hawai‘i’s Restoration Efforts THE 2005 HAWAI‘I CONSERVATION CONFERENCE Hawai‘i’s Restoration Efforts July 28-29, 2005 Hawai‘i Convention Center, Honolulu, Hawai‘i Sponsored by the Hawai‘i Conservation Alliance The Hawai‘i Conservation Conference provides an annual venue for the interaction of natural resource managers, scientists, students, and the community in Hawai‘i. Through its symposia, presentations, workshops, and poster sessions, the conference brings together the people actively involved in the protection and management of Hawai‘i’s ecosystems. This year’s conference aims to explore the most recent developments in Hawai‘i’s restoration efforts, as well as to present other significant advances in environmental conservation. Mahalo niu loa for your participation and support. The Hawai‘i Conservation Conference is organized by The Hawai‘i Conservation Alliance (HCA). This year, and for the first time, the conference is being held at the Hawai‘i Convention Center and presents a full two-day program with concurrent sessions. This year, the conference is dedicated to memory and work of Dr. Hampton L. Carson (1914-2004). Dr. Carson's work and contributions to conservation are reviewed in the program dedication. His studies in evolution and genetics have greatly contributed to our understanding of conservation genetics and small population dynamics, both being critical elements in the preservation and recovery of rare species. The Hawai‘i Conservation Alliance is a collaborative partnership between eleven federal, state and private organizations that are actively involved in natural resource conservation, management, research and education programs in Hawai‘i today. The HCA began as one of the goals of the Hawai‘i Conservation Biology Initiative in 1986. It was initially formalized as the Secretariat for Conservation Biology, and in 2002 the Secretariat was restructed and given its current title, the Hawai‘i Conservation Alliance. The purpose of this organization has remained the same: to strengthen links between conservation biology and conservation management and to provide annual meeting venues such as conferences, forums, workshops and international exchange programs. Over the nineteen years of its existence, the HCA has grown into a collaborative public-private partnership that strives to facilitate leadership in key conservation efforts in Hawai‘i. Its mission is to provide a unified leadership for the conservation and restoration community in Hawai‘i. The goals of the HCA are: (1) to provide concise information about conservation issues of statewide significance to community leaders; (2) to achieve effective management on 90% of Hawai‘i’s native ecosystems remaining in 2000; (3) to increase support for restoration of rare and endangered species; (4) to increase support for high priority, management-oriented, conservation research; (5) to strengthen the skills of conservation professionals; and (6) to increase public awareness and involvement in conserving and managing Hawai‘i’s ecosystems. 2 2005 Hawai‘i Conservation Conference Hawai‘i’s Restoration Efforts CONFERENCE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Mahalo to the following persons and organizations: Conference Organizing Committee: Stephen E. Miller (Conference Chair), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Lee-Ann Choy (Meeting Logistics Coordinator), Pacific Rim Concepts LLC; Betsy Gagné and Randy Kennedy, Hawai‘i Division of Forestry and Wildlife; Christopher F. Puttock, Hawai‘i Conservation Alliance; Bruce Casler, Waimea Valley Audubon Center; Ron Walker formerly with Hawai‘i Division of Forestry and Wildlife and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Jonathan Price, Smithsonian Institution, and Annie Marshall and Lorena Wada, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Special thanks are given to Ken Kaneshiro and his staff at the Center for Conservation Research and Training, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa for handling all Conference financial issues; to Barbara Maxfield of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for assistance with media contacts; and to Kriste Trousdale for assistance with the web presentation. Presentation Coordinator: Ron Cannarella, Hawai‘i Division of Forestry and Wildlife. Poster Coordinators: Bruce Casler, Waimea Valley Audubon Center; and Ron Walker formerly with Hawai‘i Division of Forestry and Wildlife and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Best Student Presentation Award Judges: Karen Poiani, The Nature Conservancy; Jim Jacobi, U.S.Geological Survey; and Robert Cowie, Center for Conservation Research and Training, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa. Best Student Poster Award Judges: Bill Steiner, U.S. Geological Survey; Randy Kennedy, Hawai‘i Division of Forestry and Wildlife; and J. Boone Kauffman, U.S.D.A. Forest Service. Distinguished Service Award: Betsy Gagné, Hawai‘i Division of Forestry and Wildlife. Hawai‘i Conservation Alliance Members: University of Hawai‘i, Center for Conservation Research and Training, Ken Kaneshiro, Rob Cowie; Hawai‘i Division of Forestry and Wildlife, Paul Conry, Randy Kennedy; The Nature Conservancy, Karen Poiani, Sam Gon; U.S. Forest Service, J.Boone Kauffman; U.S.D.A. Fish & Wildlife Service, Jeff Newman, Stephen E. Miller (HCA Chairperson); Bishop Museum, Allen Allison; U.S. Geological Survey, Bill Steiner, Jim Jacobi; National Park Service, Don Reeser, Melia Lane-Kamahele; Kamehameha Schools, Peter Simmon, Ulalia Woodside, Nāmaka Whitehead; Ducks, Unlimited, Adonia Henry, Tom Dwyer. HCA Executive Committee: Stephen E. Miller, Current Chairperson Christopher F. Puttock, Past Chairperson Randall Kennedy, Incoming Chairperson For more information, contact The Hawai‘i Conservation Alliance at: University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa 3050 Maile Way, Gilmore 409 Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96822 Phone: 808-956-6894 Email: [email protected] Web: www.hawaiiconservationalliance.org 2005 Hawai‘i Conservation Conference 3 Hawai‘i’s Restoration Efforts REGISTRATION AND MEETING ROOMS AT THE
Recommended publications
  • Recovery Plan for Tyoj5llllt . I-Bland Plants

    Recovery Plan for Tyoj5llllt . I-Bland Plants

    Recovery Plan for tYOJ5llllt. i-bland Plants RECOVERY PLAN FOR MULTI-ISLAND PLANTS Published by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon Approved: Date: / / As the Nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has responsibility for most ofour nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering the wisest use ofour land and water resources, protecting our fish and wildlife, preserving the environmental and cultural values ofour national parks and historical places, and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Department assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to assure that their development is in the best interests ofall our people. The Department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in island Territories under U.S. administration. DISCLAIMER PAGE Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, sometimes prepared with the assistance ofrecovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Costs indicated for task implementation and/or time for achievement ofrecovery are only estimates and are subject to change. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approval ofany individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, otherthan the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. They represent the official position ofthe U.S.
  • Sato Hawii 0085O 10652.Pdf

    Sato Hawii 0085O 10652.Pdf

    RESTORATION OF HAWAIIAN TROPICAL DRY FORESTS: A BIOCULTURAL APPROACH A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN BOTANY (CONSERVATION BIOLOGY) MAY 2020 By Aimee Y. Sato Thesis Committee: Tamara Ticktin, Chairperson Christian P. Giardina Rakan A. Zahawi Kewords: Tropical Dry Forest, Biocultural, Conservation, Restoration, Natural Regeneration, Social-Ecological 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I thank my graduate committee for steering and guiding me through my thesis work. Dr. Tamara Ticktin, my thesis advisor who has been the greatest kumu (teacher) that I could have asked for in my research. I also thank my two committee members, Dr. Rakan A. Zahawi and Dr. Christian P. Giardina, who both brought their expansive levels of expertise to help develop this thesis. Thank you so much to the hoaʻāina (caretakers/restoration managers) of my two project sites. I thank the hoaʻāina of Kaʻūpūlehu, ‘Aunty’ Yvonne Carter, ‘Uncle’ Keoki Carter, Wilds Brawner, Kekaulike Tomich, Lehua Alapai, Kuʻulei Keakealani, and ‘Aunty’ Hannah Kihalani Springer. Thank you to the hoaʻāina of Auwahi, Art Medeiros, Erica von-Allmen, Ainoa and Kalaʻau Kaiaokamalie, Amy Campbell, Andy Bieber, Robert Pitts, and Kailie Aina. I would also like to acknowledge Kamehameha Schools and the Ulupalakua Ranch for allowing me to conduct this research on their lands. Thank you to the dry forest restoration managers and researchers that participated in the overview survey of Hawaiian dry forests. On Oʻahu Island: Lorena ‘Tap’ Wada, James Harmon and Kapua Kawelo. On Hawaiʻi Island: Elliott Parsons, Rebecca Most, Lena Schnell, Kalā Asing, Jen Lawson, and Susan Cordell.
  • Comparative Biology of Seed Dormancy-Break and Germination in Convolvulaceae (Asterids, Solanales)

    Comparative Biology of Seed Dormancy-Break and Germination in Convolvulaceae (Asterids, Solanales)

    University of Kentucky UKnowledge University of Kentucky Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2008 COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY OF SEED DORMANCY-BREAK AND GERMINATION IN CONVOLVULACEAE (ASTERIDS, SOLANALES) Kariyawasam Marthinna Gamage Gehan Jayasuriya University of Kentucky, [email protected] Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Jayasuriya, Kariyawasam Marthinna Gamage Gehan, "COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY OF SEED DORMANCY- BREAK AND GERMINATION IN CONVOLVULACEAE (ASTERIDS, SOLANALES)" (2008). University of Kentucky Doctoral Dissertations. 639. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/gradschool_diss/639 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Kentucky Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION Kariyawasam Marthinna Gamage Gehan Jayasuriya Graduate School University of Kentucky 2008 COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY OF SEED DORMANCY-BREAK AND GERMINATION IN CONVOLVULACEAE (ASTERIDS, SOLANALES) ABSRACT OF DISSERTATION A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the College of Art and Sciences at the University of Kentucky By Kariyawasam Marthinna Gamage Gehan Jayasuriya Lexington, Kentucky Co-Directors: Dr. Jerry M. Baskin, Professor of Biology Dr. Carol C. Baskin, Professor of Biology and of Plant and Soil Sciences Lexington, Kentucky 2008 Copyright © Gehan Jayasuriya 2008 ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY OF SEED DORMANCY-BREAK AND GERMINATION IN CONVOLVULACEAE (ASTERIDS, SOLANALES) The biology of seed dormancy and germination of 46 species representing 11 of the 12 tribes in Convolvulaceae were compared in laboratory (mostly), field and greenhouse experiments.
  • *Wagner Et Al. --Intro

    *Wagner Et Al. --Intro

    NUMBER 60, 58 pages 15 September 1999 BISHOP MUSEUM OCCASIONAL PAPERS HAWAIIAN VASCULAR PLANTS AT RISK: 1999 WARREN L. WAGNER, MARIE M. BRUEGMANN, DERRAL M. HERBST, AND JOEL Q.C. LAU BISHOP MUSEUM PRESS HONOLULU Printed on recycled paper Cover illustration: Lobelia gloria-montis Rock, an endemic lobeliad from Maui. [From Wagner et al., 1990, Manual of flowering plants of Hawai‘i, pl. 57.] A SPECIAL PUBLICATION OF THE RECORDS OF THE HAWAII BIOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR 1998 Research publications of Bishop Museum are issued irregularly in the RESEARCH following active series: • Bishop Museum Occasional Papers. A series of short papers PUBLICATIONS OF describing original research in the natural and cultural sciences. Publications containing larger, monographic works are issued in BISHOP MUSEUM four areas: • Bishop Museum Bulletins in Anthropology • Bishop Museum Bulletins in Botany • Bishop Museum Bulletins in Entomology • Bishop Museum Bulletins in Zoology Numbering by volume of Occasional Papers ceased with volume 31. Each Occasional Paper now has its own individual number starting with Number 32. Each paper is separately paginated. The Museum also publishes Bishop Museum Technical Reports, a series containing information relative to scholarly research and collections activities. Issue is authorized by the Museum’s Scientific Publications Committee, but manuscripts do not necessarily receive peer review and are not intended as formal publications. Institutions and individuals may subscribe to any of the above or pur- chase separate publications from Bishop Museum Press, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817-0916, USA. Phone: (808) 848-4135; fax: (808) 841-8968; email: [email protected]. Institutional libraries interested in exchanging publications should write to: Library Exchange Program, Bishop Museum Library, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817-0916, USA; fax: (808) 848-4133; email: [email protected].
  • 1 DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife

    1 DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife

    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 08/04/2016 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2016-17322, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 [Docket No. FWS–R9–ES–2008–0063; 92300-1113-0000-9B] RIN 1018–AU62 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Amending the Formats of the Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, amend the format of the Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants (Lists) to reflect current practices and standards that will make the regulations and Lists easier to understand. The Lists, in the new format, are included in their entirety and have been updated to correct identified errors. 1 DATES: This rule is effective [INSERT DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Don Morgan, Ecological Services Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA, 22041; telephone 703– 358–2171. If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants (Lists), found in title 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 50 CFR 17.11 for wildlife and 50 CFR 17.12 for plants, contain the names of endangered species and threatened species officially listed pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C.
  • Kapunakea Long Range Management Plan 2016-2021

    Kapunakea Long Range Management Plan 2016-2021

    Kapunakea Preserve, West Maui, Hawaiʻi Final Long-Range Management Plan Fiscal Years 2016-2021 Submitted to the Department of Land & Natural Resources Natural Area Partnership Program Submitted by The Nature Conservancy – Hawai‘i Operating Unit April 2015 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 1 ANNUAL DELIVERABLES SUMMARY .............................................................................................................. 5 RESOURCE SUMMARY................................................................................................................................... 7 General Setting ................................................................................................................................ 7 Flora and Fauna................................................................................................................................ 7 MANAGEMENT.............................................................................................................................................. 8 Management Considerations........................................................................................................... 8 Management Units ..................................................................................................................................... 14 Management Programs .............................................................................................................................
  • TAXON:Hyptis Pectinata

    TAXON:Hyptis Pectinata

    TAXON: Hyptis pectinata (L.) Poit. SCORE: 14.0 RATING: High Risk Taxon: Hyptis pectinata (L.) Poit. Family: Lamiaceae Common Name(s): comb hyptis Synonym(s): Mesosphaerum pectinatum (L.) Kuntze Assessor: Chuck Chimera Status: Assessor Approved End Date: 21 Mar 2016 WRA Score: 14.0 Designation: H(Hawai'i) Rating: High Risk Keywords: Aromatic Herb, Crop Weed, Environmental Weed, Unpalatable, Small-Seeded Qsn # Question Answer Option Answer 101 Is the species highly domesticated? y=-3, n=0 n 102 Has the species become naturalized where grown? 103 Does the species have weedy races? Species suited to tropical or subtropical climate(s) - If 201 island is primarily wet habitat, then substitute "wet (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) (See Appendix 2) High tropical" for "tropical or subtropical" 202 Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) (See Appendix 2) High 203 Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) y=1, n=0 n Native or naturalized in regions with tropical or 204 y=1, n=0 y subtropical climates Does the species have a history of repeated introductions 205 y=-2, ?=-1, n=0 y outside its natural range? 301 Naturalized beyond native range y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2), n= question 205 y 302 Garden/amenity/disturbance weed 303 Agricultural/forestry/horticultural weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see Appendix 2) y 304 Environmental weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see Appendix 2) y 305 Congeneric weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2) y 401 Produces spines, thorns or burrs y=1, n=0 n 402 Allelopathic 403 Parasitic y=1, n=0 n 404 Unpalatable to grazing animals y=1, n=-1 y 405 Toxic to animals y=1, n=0 n 406 Host for recognized pests and pathogens 407 Causes allergies or is otherwise toxic to humans y=1, n=0 n 408 Creates a fire hazard in natural ecosystems 409 Is a shade tolerant plant at some stage of its life cycle Tolerates a wide range of soil conditions (or limestone 410 y=1, n=0 y conditions if not a volcanic island) Creation Date: 22 Mar 2016 (Hyptis pectinata (L.) Poit.) Page 1 of 16 TAXON: Hyptis pectinata (L.) Poit.
  • Phylogeny and Morphological Evolution of the Chenopodiaceae-Amaranthaceae Alliance Donald B

    Phylogeny and Morphological Evolution of the Chenopodiaceae-Amaranthaceae Alliance Donald B

    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2003 Phylogeny and morphological evolution of the Chenopodiaceae-Amaranthaceae alliance Donald B. Pratt Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Botany Commons, and the Genetics Commons Recommended Citation Pratt, Donald B., "Phylogeny and morphological evolution of the Chenopodiaceae-Amaranthaceae alliance " (2003). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 613. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/613 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
  • Phylogenetic Analyses of Amaranthaceae Based on Matk DNA Sequence Data with Emphasis on West African Species

    Phylogenetic Analyses of Amaranthaceae Based on Matk DNA Sequence Data with Emphasis on West African Species

    Turk J Bot Research Article 33 (2009) 153-161 © TÜBİTAK doi:10.3906/bot-0707-15 Phylogenetic Analyses of Amaranthaceae Based on matK DNA Sequence Data with Emphasis on West African Species Oluwatoyin T. OGUNDIPE1,*, Mark CHASE2 1Department of Botany and Microbiology, University of Lagos, Akoka, Lagos, NIGERIA 2Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK Received: 19.07.2007 Accepted: 28.04.2009 Abstract: Comparative sequencing of the chloroplast matK coding and non-coding regions was used to examine relationship among the species of Amaranthaceae with emphasis on the West African species and other closely related family such as Chenopodiaceae, Portulacaceae, and Caryophyllaceae. Phylogenetic analysis of the matK sequences alone and in combination using maximum parsimony methods produced monophyletic lineage of Amaranthaceae-Chenopodiaceae. Our results indicated that a polyphyletic Celosieae as sister to an Amaranthus-Chemissoa lineage. Subfamily Amaranthoideae is paraphyletic to the core Gomphrenoids. This study also shows that the polyphyly of Amarantheae is apparent and so is the polyphyly of Amaranthinae. Key Words: Amaranthaceae, matK, Phylogenetic analyses Introduction Amaranthaceae and Chenopodiaceae are similar in Amaranthaceae, commonly called the Amaranth their morphology, anatomy, and phytochemistry (Brown, family, contains about 65 genera and 900 species. They 1810; Bentham & Hooker, 1880; Baillo, 1887; Volkens, are widespread and cosmopolitan in distribution but most 1893; Carolin, 1983; Kuhn et al., 1993; Townsend, abundant in tropics, subtropics, and warm-temperate 1993). Furthermore, based on serological studies, it is regions, evidently absent from alpine and arctic regions. believed that Amaranthaceae and the related sister family Centres of diversity for Amaranthaceae are south-western Chenopodiaceae should be merged together (Baillon, North America, Central America, South America, and 1887 & Mallingson, 1922).
  • Disparity, Diversity, and Duplications in the Caryophyllales

    Disparity, Diversity, and Duplications in the Caryophyllales

    Research Disparity, diversity, and duplications in the Caryophyllales Stephen A. Smith1, Joseph W. Brown1, Ya Yang2, Riva Bruenn3, Chloe P. Drummond3, Samuel F. Brockington4, Joseph F. Walker1, Noah Last2, Norman A. Douglas3 and Michael J. Moore3 1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48103, USA; 2Department of Plant Biology, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 1445 Gortner Avenue, St Paul, MN 55108, USA; 3Department of Biology, Oberlin College, 119 Woodland St, Oberlin, OH 44074-1097, USA; 4Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK Summary Author for correspondence: The role played by whole genome duplication (WGD) in plant evolution is actively debated. Stephen A. Smith WGDs have been associated with advantages such as superior colonization, various adapta- Tel: +1 734 615 5510 tions, and increased effective population size. However, the lack of a comprehensive mapping Email: [email protected] of WGDs within a major plant clade has led to uncertainty regarding the potential association Received: 30 May 2017 of WGDs and higher diversification rates. Accepted: 28 July 2017 Using seven chloroplast and nuclear ribosomal genes, we constructed a phylogeny of 5036 species of Caryophyllales, representing nearly half of the extant species. We phylogenetically New Phytologist (2017) mapped putative WGDs as identified from analyses on transcriptomic and genomic data and doi: 10.1111/nph.14772 analyzed these in conjunction with shifts in climatic occupancy and lineage diversification rate. Thirteen putative WGDs and 27 diversification shifts could be mapped onto the phylogeny. Key words: Caryophyllales, climatic occupancy, diversification rates, duplications, Of these, four WGDs were concurrent with diversification shifts, with other diversification phylogenomics.
  • Santalum Freycinetianum Var. Lanaiense Lanai Sandalwood (‘Iliahi)

    Santalum Freycinetianum Var. Lanaiense Lanai Sandalwood (‘Iliahi)

    Santalum freycinetianum var. lanaiense Lanai sandalwood (‘iliahi) 5-Year Review Summary and Evaluation U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office Honolulu, Hawaii 5-YEAR REVIEW Species reviewed: Santalum freycinetianum var. lanaiense / Lanai sandalwood (‘iliahi) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION ........................................................................................... 3 1.1 Reviewers .......................................................................................................................3 1.2 Methodology used to complete the review:................................................................. 3 1.3 Background: .................................................................................................................. 3 2.0 REVIEW ANALYSIS........................................................................................................ 5 2.1 Application of the 1996 Distinct Population Segment (DPS) policy......................... 5 2.2 Recovery Criteria.......................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Updated Information and Current Species Status .................................................... 7 2.4 Synthesis.......................................................................................................................14 3.0 RESULTS .........................................................................................................................16 3.1 Recommended Classification:...................................................................................
  • What Is the Evidence That Invasive Species Are a Significant Contributor to the Decline Or Loss of Threatened Species? Philip D

    What Is the Evidence That Invasive Species Are a Significant Contributor to the Decline Or Loss of Threatened Species? Philip D

    Invasive Species Systematic Review, March 2015 What is the evidence that invasive species are a significant contributor to the decline or loss of threatened species? Philip D. Roberts, Hilda Diaz-Soltero, David J. Hemming, Martin J. Parr, Richard H. Shaw, Nicola Wakefield, Holly J. Wright, Arne B.R. Witt www.cabi.org KNOWLEDGE FOR LIFE Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................. 1 Abstract .................................................................................................................................... 3 Keywords ................................................................................................................................. 4 Definitions ................................................................................................................................ 4 Background .............................................................................................................................. 5 Objective of the review ............................................................................................................ 7 The primary review question: ....................................................................................... 7 Secondary question 1: ................................................................................................. 7 Secondary question 2: ................................................................................................. 7 Methods