DOCSLIB.ORG

Sato Hawii 0085O 10652.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sato Hawii 0085O 10652.Pdf RESTORATION OF HAWAIIAN TROPICAL DRY FORESTS: A BIOCULTURAL APPROACH A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN BOTANY (CONSERVATION BIOLOGY) MAY 2020 By Aimee Y. Sato Thesis Committee: Tamara Ticktin, Chairperson Christian P. Giardina Rakan A. Zahawi Kewords: Tropical Dry Forest, Biocultural, Conservation, Restoration, Natural Regeneration, Social-Ecological 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I thank my graduate committee for steering and guiding me through my thesis work. Dr. Tamara Ticktin, my thesis advisor who has been the greatest kumu (teacher) that I could have asked for in my research. I also thank my two committee members, Dr. Rakan A. Zahawi and Dr. Christian P. Giardina, who both brought their expansive levels of expertise to help develop this thesis. Thank you so much to the hoaʻāina (caretakers/restoration managers) of my two project sites. I thank the hoaʻāina of Kaʻūpūlehu, ‘Aunty’ Yvonne Carter, ‘Uncle’ Keoki Carter, Wilds Brawner, Kekaulike Tomich, Lehua Alapai, Kuʻulei Keakealani, and ‘Aunty’ Hannah Kihalani Springer. Thank you to the hoaʻāina of Auwahi, Art Medeiros, Erica von-Allmen, Ainoa and Kalaʻau Kaiaokamalie, Amy Campbell, Andy Bieber, Robert Pitts, and Kailie Aina. I would also like to acknowledge Kamehameha Schools and the Ulupalakua Ranch for allowing me to conduct this research on their lands. Thank you to the dry forest restoration managers and researchers that participated in the overview survey of Hawaiian dry forests. On Oʻahu Island: Lorena ‘Tap’ Wada, James Harmon and Kapua Kawelo. On Hawaiʻi Island: Elliott Parsons, Rebecca Most, Lena Schnell, Kalā Asing, Jen Lawson, and Susan Cordell. I would like to thank the Ticktin lab, past and present lab members, for being the most supportive lab I could imagine (Smrity Ramavarapu, Julia Douglas, Miles Thomas, Lauren Nerfa, Ashley McGuigan, Zoe Hastings, Reko Libby, Georgia Fredeluces-Hart, Gioconda Lopez Vargas, Katie Kamelamela, Natalie Kurashima, and Rachel Dacks). A special mahalo to Reko Libby and Natalie Kurashima as this long-term collaborative work with Kaʻūpūlehu and the Ticktin lab would not have been possible without both of their previous work. I would also like to thank Maile Wong for assisting with field work at Kaʻūpūlehu. Funding provided by the Beatrice Krauss Fellowship was very helpful in covering research costs. My fellowship with the Hauʻoli Mau Loa Foundation was essential for my graduate school experience, and I am extremely thankful to the Foundation for funding my tuition, for providing me a substantial stipend to allow me to concentrate on my studies, and lastly for providing me with professional development funds to assist me with my research costs as well as investing in my professional development training. Thank you Hauʻoli Mau Loa for believing and investing in local Hawaiʻi students to pursue higher education and become leaders in our home, Hawaiʻi. And last but not least, thank you to my friends and family for supporting me every step of the way. My mom and sister who have been the greatest role models for me. My pillar of support, Phillip Kapu, for taking any role to help me to the finish line. And a special thank you to my two Hālau (Hawaiian School of Learning) families. Nā Hula O Kaohikūkapulani and my kumu, Kapu Kinimaka Alquiza for teaching me Hula and raising me around Hawaiian culture. My family of Hālau ʻŌhiʻa, including my kumu, Kekuhi Kealiikanakaoleohaililani, who has provided me the fertilizer that I needed to grow stronger, and my fellow Hālau members that have become my sisters and brothers who inspire me always. Mahalo. 2 ABSTRACT Worldwide, tropical dry forests are among the most endangered of all tropical forest ecosystems, and tropical dry forests once represented the greatest species diversity among forest types in Hawaiʻi. Current research shows that the extent of native tropical dry forest cover in Hawaiʻi may be as low as 1% of its original cover, with 45% of the tropical dry forest plant species at risk of endangerment. Despite the historical and current relationship of these forests with the wao kanaka (lower elevation human settlement zones), there has been little evaluation on the social-ecological outcomes of a biocultural approach to tropical dry forest restoration. Two forest restoration projects located within Kaʻūpūlehu and Auwahi, have excluded ungulates and removed alien plant species, and have used biocultural approaches to restoration. Drawing on these two sites as case-studies, this thesis discusses the motivations for, and components of a biocultural approach, provides a measure of the ecological success using a case-study of biocultural restoration at Kaʻūpūlehu, and includes an assessment on the status of tropical dry forest restoration projects across Hawaiʻi. This multidisciplinary study shows that the ecological success of the forest is directly interlinked with the social benefits of restoration, and I recommend that conservation and restoration efforts in Hawaiʻi should foster and recognize the continued relationship between the kaiaulu (human community) and kaiaola (ecosystem) of tropical dry forests. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................ 2 ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................... 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................ 4 LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................... 8 LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................ 9 LIST OF APPENDICES ............................................................................................................... 11 CHAPTER 1 ................................................................................................................................. 12 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 12 Study Sites ............................................................................................................................. 17 Auwahi TDF ...................................................................................................................... 17 Kaʻūpūlehu TDF ................................................................................................................ 18 MATERIALS AND METHODS .............................................................................................. 19 Hoaʻāina (Caretakers/Restoration Managers) Analyses ........................................................ 19 Kaiaulu (Human community) Analyses ................................................................................ 20 RESULTS.................................................................................................................................. 22 Personal Relationship to Place .............................................................................................. 22 Hoaʻāina Perspectives ........................................................................................................ 22 Kaiaulu Perspectives .......................................................................................................... 26 Defining Biocultural .............................................................................................................. 27 Hoaʻāina Perspectives ........................................................................................................ 27 Biocultural Measures of Success ........................................................................................... 33 Hoaʻāina Perspectives ........................................................................................................ 33 Impacts of Biocultural Restoration on Kaiaulu ..................................................................... 39 4 Kaiaulu Perspectives .......................................................................................................... 39 DISCUSSION ........................................................................................................................... 42 Restoring the Relationships of Kaiaola (Ecosystem) and Kaiaulu (Community) ................. 43 Biocultural Includes Nā Mea Āpau (Everything) .................................................................. 45 Challenges with a Biocultural Approach ............................................................................... 47 CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................................... 49 CHAPTER 2 ................................................................................................................................. 50 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 50 MATERIALS AND METHODS .............................................................................................. 52 Monitoring Recruitment and Survival ................................................................................... 52 Mapping Ecological Recruitment to Analyze
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pu'u Wa'awa'a Biological Assessment
    PU‘U WA‘AWA‘A BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT PU‘U WA‘AWA‘A, NORTH KONA, HAWAII Prepared by: Jon G. Giffin Forestry & Wildlife Manager August 2003 STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF FORESTRY AND WILDLIFE TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE ................................................................................................................................. i TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................. ii GENERAL SETTING...................................................................................................................1 Introduction..........................................................................................................................1 Land Use Practices...............................................................................................................1 Geology..................................................................................................................................3 Lava Flows............................................................................................................................5 Lava Tubes ...........................................................................................................................5 Cinder Cones ........................................................................................................................7 Soils .......................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Plan for Tyoj5llllt . I-Bland Plants
    Recovery Plan for tYOJ5llllt. i-bland Plants RECOVERY PLAN FOR MULTI-ISLAND PLANTS Published by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon Approved: Date: / / As the Nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has responsibility for most ofour nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering the wisest use ofour land and water resources, protecting our fish and wildlife, preserving the environmental and cultural values ofour national parks and historical places, and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Department assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to assure that their development is in the best interests ofall our people. The Department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in island Territories under U.S. administration. DISCLAIMER PAGE Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, sometimes prepared with the assistance ofrecovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Costs indicated for task implementation and/or time for achievement ofrecovery are only estimates and are subject to change. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approval ofany individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, otherthan the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. They represent the official position ofthe U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • List 01 Hawaiian Names 01 Plants
    V\.{). 3 v BOTANICAL BULLETIN NO.2 JUNE. 1913 TERRITORY OF HAWAII BOARD OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY List 01 Hawaiian Names 01 Plants BY JOSEPH F. ROCK Consulting Botanist, Board of Agriculture and Forestry HONOLULU: HAWAIIAN GAZETTE CO., LTD. 1913 ALPHABETICAL LIST OF HAWAIIAN NAMES OF PLANTS. The following list of Hawaiian plant-names has been compiled from various sources. Hillebrand in his valuable Flora of the Hawaiian Islands has given many Hawaiian names, especially of the more common species; these are incorporated in this list with a few corrections. Nearly all Hawaiian plant-names found in this list and not in Hillebrand's Flora were secured from Mr. Francis Gay of the Island of Kauai, an old resident in this Terri­ tory and well acquainted with its plants from a layman's stand­ point. It was the writer's privilege to camp with Mr. Gay in the mountains of Kauai collecting botanical material; for almost every species he could give the native name, which he had se­ cured in the early days from old and reliable natives. Mr. Gay had made spatter prints of many of the native plants in a large record book with their names and uses, as well as their symbolic meaning when occurring in mele (songs) or olioli (chants), at­ tached to them. For all this information the writer is indebted mainly to Mr. Francis Gay and also to Mr. Augustus F. Knudsen of the same Island. The writer also secured Hawaiian names from old na­ tives and Kahunas (priests) in the various islands of the group.
    [Show full text]
  • Game Management Plans to Facilitate Effective Program Implementation
    Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources Division of Forestry and Wildlife Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Program Game Management Program FY17-FY21 Program Narrative W-22-G, Segments 17-21 1 Table of Contents Hawaii Game Management Program ................................................................................................. 4 Budget Schedule ................................................................................................................................. 7 Job Descriptions ................................................................................................................................. 8 Project 1.W-22-GC-1 State of Hawaii Game Program Planning and Coordination .......................... 8 Project 2.W-23-GL-1 Statewide Game Land Access and Acquisition……………………………..10 Project 3.W-29-GR-1 Game Mammal Research: Accurately Estimate Sheep and Goat Survival Rates, Population Demographics and Habitat Use in the Puu Waawaa Forest Reserve and Puu Anahulu GMA: West Hawaii……………………………………………………………...12 Project 4.W-30-NP Nāpuʻu Conservation Project Hawaii Island..…………………………………13 Project 5.W-24-GO-01 Game Operations and Maintenance: Hawaii County - East Hawaii District .......................................................................................................................................................... 14 Project 6.W-24-GO-02 Game Operations and Maintenance Hawaii County - West Hawaii District .........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • United States of America
    anran Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations GLOBAL FOREST RESOURCES ASSESSMENT COUNTRY REPORTS NITED TATES OF MERICA U S A FRA2005/040 Rome, 2005 FRA 2005 – Country Report 040 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA The Forest Resources Assessment Programme Sustainably managed forests have multiple environmental and socio-economic functions important at the global, national and local scales, and play a vital part in sustainable development. Reliable and up- to-date information on the state of forest resources - not only on area and area change, but also on such variables as growing stock, wood and non-wood products, carbon, protected areas, use of forests for recreation and other services, biological diversity and forests’ contribution to national economies - is crucial to support decision-making for policies and programmes in forestry and sustainable development at all levels. FAO, at the request of its member countries, regularly monitors the world’s forests and their management and uses through the Forest Resources Assessment Programme. This country report forms part of the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005 (FRA 2005), which is the most comprehensive assessment to date. More than 800 people have been involved, including 172 national correspondents and their colleagues, an Advisory Group, international experts, FAO staff, consultants and volunteers. Information has been collated from 229 countries and territories for three points in time: 1990, 2000 and 2005. The reporting framework for FRA 2005 is based on the thematic elements of sustainable forest management acknowledged in intergovernmental forest-related fora and includes more than 40 variables related to the extent, condition, uses and values of forest resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Biology of Seed Dormancy-Break and Germination in Convolvulaceae (Asterids, Solanales)
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge University of Kentucky Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2008 COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY OF SEED DORMANCY-BREAK AND GERMINATION IN CONVOLVULACEAE (ASTERIDS, SOLANALES) Kariyawasam Marthinna Gamage Gehan Jayasuriya University of Kentucky, [email protected] Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Jayasuriya, Kariyawasam Marthinna Gamage Gehan, "COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY OF SEED DORMANCY- BREAK AND GERMINATION IN CONVOLVULACEAE (ASTERIDS, SOLANALES)" (2008). University of Kentucky Doctoral Dissertations. 639. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/gradschool_diss/639 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Kentucky Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION Kariyawasam Marthinna Gamage Gehan Jayasuriya Graduate School University of Kentucky 2008 COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY OF SEED DORMANCY-BREAK AND GERMINATION IN CONVOLVULACEAE (ASTERIDS, SOLANALES) ABSRACT OF DISSERTATION A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the College of Art and Sciences at the University of Kentucky By Kariyawasam Marthinna Gamage Gehan Jayasuriya Lexington, Kentucky Co-Directors: Dr. Jerry M. Baskin, Professor of Biology Dr. Carol C. Baskin, Professor of Biology and of Plant and Soil Sciences Lexington, Kentucky 2008 Copyright © Gehan Jayasuriya 2008 ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY OF SEED DORMANCY-BREAK AND GERMINATION IN CONVOLVULACEAE (ASTERIDS, SOLANALES) The biology of seed dormancy and germination of 46 species representing 11 of the 12 tribes in Convolvulaceae were compared in laboratory (mostly), field and greenhouse experiments.
    [Show full text]
  • *Wagner Et Al. --Intro
    NUMBER 60, 58 pages 15 September 1999 BISHOP MUSEUM OCCASIONAL PAPERS HAWAIIAN VASCULAR PLANTS AT RISK: 1999 WARREN L. WAGNER, MARIE M. BRUEGMANN, DERRAL M. HERBST, AND JOEL Q.C. LAU BISHOP MUSEUM PRESS HONOLULU Printed on recycled paper Cover illustration: Lobelia gloria-montis Rock, an endemic lobeliad from Maui. [From Wagner et al., 1990, Manual of flowering plants of Hawai‘i, pl. 57.] A SPECIAL PUBLICATION OF THE RECORDS OF THE HAWAII BIOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR 1998 Research publications of Bishop Museum are issued irregularly in the RESEARCH following active series: • Bishop Museum Occasional Papers. A series of short papers PUBLICATIONS OF describing original research in the natural and cultural sciences. Publications containing larger, monographic works are issued in BISHOP MUSEUM four areas: • Bishop Museum Bulletins in Anthropology • Bishop Museum Bulletins in Botany • Bishop Museum Bulletins in Entomology • Bishop Museum Bulletins in Zoology Numbering by volume of Occasional Papers ceased with volume 31. Each Occasional Paper now has its own individual number starting with Number 32. Each paper is separately paginated. The Museum also publishes Bishop Museum Technical Reports, a series containing information relative to scholarly research and collections activities. Issue is authorized by the Museum’s Scientific Publications Committee, but manuscripts do not necessarily receive peer review and are not intended as formal publications. Institutions and individuals may subscribe to any of the above or pur- chase separate publications from Bishop Museum Press, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817-0916, USA. Phone: (808) 848-4135; fax: (808) 841-8968; email: [email protected]. Institutional libraries interested in exchanging publications should write to: Library Exchange Program, Bishop Museum Library, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817-0916, USA; fax: (808) 848-4133; email: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Auwahi: Ethnobotany of a Hawaiian Dryland Forest
    AUWAHI: ETHNOBOTANY OF A HAWAIIAN DRYLAND FOREST. A. C. Medeiros1, C.F. Davenport2, and C.G. Chimera1 1. U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, Haleakala Field Station, P.O. Box 369, Makawao, HI 96768 2. Social Sciences Department, Maui Community College, 310 Ka’ahumanu Ave., Kahului, HI 96732 ABSTRACT Auwahi district on East Maui extends from sea level to about 6800 feet (1790 meters) elevation at the southwest rift of leeward Haleakal¯a volcano. In botanical references, Auwahi currently refers to a centrally located, fairly large (5400 acres) stand of diverse dry forest at 3000-5000 feet (915- 1525 meters) elevation surrounded by less diverse forest and more open-statured shrubland on lava. Auwahi contains high native tree diversity with 50 dryland species, many with extremely hard, durable, and heavy wood. To early Hawaiians, forests like Auwahi must have seemed an invaluable source of unique natural materials, especially the wide variety of woods for tool making for agriculture and fishing, canoe building, kapa making, and weapons. Of the 50 species of native trees at Auwahi, 19 species (38%) are known to have been used for medicine, 13 species (26%) for tool-making, 13 species (26%) for canoe building 13 species (26%) for house building, 8 species (16%) for tools for making kapa, 8 species (16%) for weapons 8 species (16%) for fishing, 8 species (16%) for dyes, and 7 species (14 %) for religious purposes. Other miscellaneous uses include edible fruits or seeds, bird lime, cordage, a fish narcotizing agent, firewood, a source of "fireworks", recreation, scenting agents, poi boards, and h¯olua sled construction.
    [Show full text]
  • Kapunakea Long Range Management Plan 2016-2021
    Kapunakea Preserve, West Maui, Hawaiʻi Final Long-Range Management Plan Fiscal Years 2016-2021 Submitted to the Department of Land & Natural Resources Natural Area Partnership Program Submitted by The Nature Conservancy – Hawai‘i Operating Unit April 2015 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 1 ANNUAL DELIVERABLES SUMMARY .............................................................................................................. 5 RESOURCE SUMMARY................................................................................................................................... 7 General Setting ................................................................................................................................ 7 Flora and Fauna................................................................................................................................ 7 MANAGEMENT.............................................................................................................................................. 8 Management Considerations........................................................................................................... 8 Management Units ..................................................................................................................................... 14 Management Programs .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of the New World Diploid Cottons (Gossypium L., Malvaceae) Based on Sequences of Three Low-Copy Nuclear Genes
    P1. Syst. Evol. 252: 199-214 (2005) Plant Systematics DO1 SO. 1007/~00606-004-0294-0 and Evo1utiua Printed in Austria Phylogeny of the New World diploid cottons (Gossypium L., Malvaceae) based on sequences of three low-copy nuclear genes I. ~lvarez',R. cronn2, and J. F. wende13 '~ealJardin Botiinico de Madrid, CSIC, Madrid, Spain 2 Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Corvallis, Oregon, USA 3 Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA Received October 4, 2004; accepted December 15, 2004 Published online: May 9, 2005 O Springer-Verlag 2005 Abstract. American diploid cottons (Gossypium L., Introduction subgenus Houzingenia Fryxell) form a monophy- letic group of 13 species distributed mainly in New World, diploid Gossypium species com- western Mexico, extending into Arizona, Baja prise a morphological and cytogenetic California, and with one disjunct species each in (D-genome) assemblage (Cronn et al. 2002, the Galapagos Islands and Peru. Prior phylogenetic Endrizzi et al. 1985, Wendel 1995, Wendel and analyses based on an alcohol dehydrogenase gene Cronn 2003) that taxonomically is recognized (AdhA) and nuclear ribosomal DNA indicated the as subgenus Houzingenia (Fryxell 1969, 1979, need for additional data from other molecular 1992). This group of plants includes 11 species markers to resolve phylogenetic relationships with- distributed primarily in SW Mexico and in this subgenus. Toward this end, we sequenced extending northward into Arizona, in addition three nuclear genes, the anonymous locus A1341, to two other species with disjunct distributions an alcohol dehydrogenase gene (AdhC), and a cellulose synthase gene (CesA 1b). Independent and in Peru and the Galapagos Islands (Fryxell combined analyses resolved clades that are congru- 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • TAXON:Hyptis Pectinata
    TAXON: Hyptis pectinata (L.) Poit. SCORE: 14.0 RATING: High Risk Taxon: Hyptis pectinata (L.) Poit. Family: Lamiaceae Common Name(s): comb hyptis Synonym(s): Mesosphaerum pectinatum (L.) Kuntze Assessor: Chuck Chimera Status: Assessor Approved End Date: 21 Mar 2016 WRA Score: 14.0 Designation: H(Hawai'i) Rating: High Risk Keywords: Aromatic Herb, Crop Weed, Environmental Weed, Unpalatable, Small-Seeded Qsn # Question Answer Option Answer 101 Is the species highly domesticated? y=-3, n=0 n 102 Has the species become naturalized where grown? 103 Does the species have weedy races? Species suited to tropical or subtropical climate(s) - If 201 island is primarily wet habitat, then substitute "wet (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) (See Appendix 2) High tropical" for "tropical or subtropical" 202 Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) (See Appendix 2) High 203 Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) y=1, n=0 n Native or naturalized in regions with tropical or 204 y=1, n=0 y subtropical climates Does the species have a history of repeated introductions 205 y=-2, ?=-1, n=0 y outside its natural range? 301 Naturalized beyond native range y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2), n= question 205 y 302 Garden/amenity/disturbance weed 303 Agricultural/forestry/horticultural weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see Appendix 2) y 304 Environmental weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see Appendix 2) y 305 Congeneric weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2) y 401 Produces spines, thorns or burrs y=1, n=0 n 402 Allelopathic 403 Parasitic y=1, n=0 n 404 Unpalatable to grazing animals y=1, n=-1 y 405 Toxic to animals y=1, n=0 n 406 Host for recognized pests and pathogens 407 Causes allergies or is otherwise toxic to humans y=1, n=0 n 408 Creates a fire hazard in natural ecosystems 409 Is a shade tolerant plant at some stage of its life cycle Tolerates a wide range of soil conditions (or limestone 410 y=1, n=0 y conditions if not a volcanic island) Creation Date: 22 Mar 2016 (Hyptis pectinata (L.) Poit.) Page 1 of 16 TAXON: Hyptis pectinata (L.) Poit.
    [Show full text]
  • Atoll Research Bulletin No. 311 a Bibliography of Plant
    ATOLL RESEARCH BULLETIN NO. 311 A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF PLANT CONSERVATION IN THE PACIFIC ISLANDS: ENDANGERED SPECIES, HABITAT CONVERSION, INTRODUCED BIOTA BY ROBERT A. DEFILIPPS ISSUED BY NATIONAL MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION WASHINGTON, D.C., U.S.A. October 1987 @ COPYKTGHT 1.987 by IIAIJP~I' J GECIGRAPIITC SOCIETY & HAWAIIAN TELEPHONE COMPANY - -a]. 1 r i.~htsreserved Permission to use or reprint must be obtained in writing from ~awai'iGeographic Society .5A*.* Northern / I .LYCU." An 18 x 25" (45 x 62 cm) en- .I.. "l-*ln i Y",W Mariana 1.................................................................. I I rour* rrc,rr courllllor I ........ I largement of this map is avail- able postpaid for $5; the same size, deluxe edition, sent rolled in a tube via airmail is $10. A complete list of available maps will be sent on request. Send orders, requests for informa- tion, and suggestions to: Hawai'i Geographic Society Post Office Box 1698 Honolulu, 96806-1698, HAWAII 2oS-53&-3S52 ......... 80U-323-3723-~h5~......... I i I A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF PLANT CONSERVATION IN THE PACIFIC ISLANDS: ENDANGERED SPECIES, HABITAT CONVERSION, INTRODUCED BIOTA BY ROBERT A. DEFILIPPS Introduction To plant conservationists who must fervently gather botanical intelligence against a time-frame of rapidly dwindling plant populations and habitats, the following statements expressed by M.-H. Sachet and F.R. Fosberg (1955, 1971) are both pertinent and self-explanatory: "The great unsolved problem of modern scientific methodology is that of bibliography, that of knowing what has been accomplished already. In starting any line of investigation the scientist is faced with the choice of ignoring his predeces- sors, possibly wasting much time on work that has already been done and missing valuable information and ideas, or of spending a large proportion of his time in study of current and past literature on the field.
    [Show full text]