DOCSLIB.ORG

American Political Science Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
American Political Science Review Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.33.19, on 24 Sep 2021 at 03:56:34, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000581 AMERICAN POLITICAL AMERICAN POLITICAL ASSOCIATION SCIENCE SCIENCE REVIEW Volume 114, Issue 3 Issue 114, Volume ISSN: 0003-0554 ISSN: August 2020 LEAD EDITORS David Broockman Alan Jacobs Mark Pickup Clarissa Hayward UC Berkeley, USA University of British Columbia, Simon Fraser University, USA Washington University in St. Louis, Nadia E. Brown Canada Melanye Price USA Purdue University, USA Amaney Jamal Prairie View A&M University, USA Julie Novkov Renee Buhr Princeton University, USA Karthick Ramakrishnan University at Albany, SUNY, USA University of St. Thomas, USA Juliet Johnson UC Riverside, USA Pradeep Chhibber McGill University, Canada Gina Yannitell Reinhardt EDITORS UC Berkeley, USA Michael Jones-Correa University of Essex, UK Sharon Wright Austin Cathy Cohen University of Pennsylvania, USA Andrew Reynolds University of Florida, USA University of Chicago, USA Kimuli Kasara University of North Carolina, USA Michelle L. Dion Katherine Cramer Columbia University, USA Emily Hencken Ritter McMaster University, Canada University of Wisconsin - Madison, Helen M. Kinsella Vanderbilt University, USA Kelly M. Kadera USA University of Minnesota, USA Molly Roberts University of Iowa, USA Paisley Currah Brett Ashley Leeds UC San Diego, USA Celeste Montoya CUNY, USA Rice University, USA Melvin Rogers University of Colorado, Boulder, USA Alexandre Debs Ines Levin Brown University, USA Valeria Sinclair-Chapman Yale University, USA UC Irvine, USA Nita Rudra Purdue University, USA Jacqueline H. R. DeMeritt Jacob T. Levy Georgetown University, USA Dara Strolovitch University of North Texas, USA McGill University, Canada Burcu Savun Princeton University, USA Scott Desposato Pei-te Lien University of Pittsburgh, USA Alli Mari Tripp UC San Diego, USA UC Santa Barbara, USA Ken Scheve https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000581 . University of Wisconsin, Madison, Shirin Deylami Sheryl Lightfoot Stanford University, USA USA Western Washington University, University of British Columbia, USA Melissa Schwartzberg Denise M. Walsh USA Jinee Lokaneeta New York University, USA University of Virginia, USA James N. Druckman Drew University, USA Peregrine Schwartz-Shea S. Laurel Weldon Northwestern University, USA Catherine Lu University of Utah, USA Simon Fraser University, Canada Thad Dunning McGill University, Canada Maya Sen Elisabeth Jean Wood UC Berkeley, USA Juan Pablo Luna Harvard University, USA Yale University, USA Elisabeth Ellis Pontificia Universidad Catolica, Elizabeth Sharrow University of Otago, New Zealand Chile University of Massachusetts Amherst, MANAGING EDITOR Tanisha Fazal Ellen Lust USA Dragana Svraka University of Minnesota, USA University of Gothenburg, Sweden Kathryn Sikkink ADVISORY BOARD FOR Evgeny Finkel Marc Lynch Harvard University, USA ETHICAL RESEARCH Johns Hopkins University, USA Geroge Washington University, USA Laura Sjoberg Catherine Boone Jason Frank Lauren M. MacLean University of Florida, USA/Royal https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms London School of Economics and Cornell University, USA University of Indiana, USA Holloway, UK Political Science, UK Jill Frank Samantha Majic Anand Sokhey Scott Desposato Cornell University, USA CUNY - John Jay College, USA University of Colorado, Boulder, USA UC, San Diego, USA Robert J. Franzese Melanie Manion Sarah Song Macartan Humphries University of Michigan, USA Duke University, USA UC Berkeley, USA WZB Berlin and Columbia University, Lorrie Frasure Isabela Mares Dietland Stolle USA UCLA, USA Yale University, USA McGill University, Canada Lauren Maclean Elisabeth Jay Friedman Valerie Martinez-Ebers Kathleen Thelen Indiana University, USA University of San Francisco, USA University of North Texas, USA Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Layna Mosley Lisa Garcia-Bedolla Seth Masket USA Princeton University, USA UC Berkeley, USA University of Denver, USA Cameron Thies Peri Schwartz-Shea Daniel Gillion Peace A. Medie Arizona State University, USA University of Utah, USA University of Pennsylvania, USA University of Bristol, UK Jakana Thomas Farah Godrej Jamila Michener Michigan State University, USA EDITORIAL BOARD UC Riverside, USA Cornell University, USA Erica Townsend-Bell Claire Adida Stephan Haggard Michael Minta Oklahoma State University, USA UC San Diego, USA UC San Diego, USA University of Minnesota, USA Ethel Tungchan Phillip Ayoub Kerry Haynie Sara McLaughlin Mitchell York University, Canada Occidental College, USA Duke University, USA University of Iowa, USA Antonio Y. Vázquez-Arroyo Lisa Baldez Errol Henderson Burt Monroe Rutgers University, USA , subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at Dartmouth College, USA Pennsylvania State University, USA Pennsylvania State University, USA Lisa Wedeen Laurie Balfour Yoshiko Herrera Layna Mosley University of Chicago, USA University of Virginia, USA University of Wisconsin - Madison, Princeton University, USA Jessica Weeks Karen Beckwith USA Tamir Moustafa University of Wisconsin - Madison, Case Western Reserve University, Juliet Hooker Simon Fraser University, Canada USA USA Brown University, USA Byron D’Andra Orey Ismail K. White Catherine Boone Macartan Humphreys Jackson State University, USA Princeton University, USA London School of Economics and WZB Berlin and Columbia Elizabeth Maggie Penn Jennifer Wolak Political Science, UK University Emory University, USA University of Colorado, Boulder, USA 24 Sep 2021 at 03:56:34 Janet Box-Steffensmeier Vince Hutchings Ravi Perry Janelle Wong , on Ohio State University, USA University of Michigan, USA Howard University, USA University of Maryland, USA Pamela Brandwein Turkuler Isikel Justin Phillips Deborah J. Yashar University of Michigan, USA Columbia University, USA Columbia University, USA Princeton University, USA 170.106.33.19 Association Office Address and Membership Information: American Political Science Association individual membership dues are: Regular members with in- come of $200,000+, $325; $135,000 –$199,999, $276; $100,000 –$134,999, $246; $80,000 –$99,999, $212; $60,000 –$79,999, $191; $50,000 –$59,999, $175; $40,000 –$49,999, $145; $30,000 –$39,999, $98; under $30,000, $78; life member, $4,000; associate member (can select only one journal for print or online), $75; family member, $34; K-12 educator, $50; student member, $52; unemployed member, $45; retired, $25,000+, $66; retired under $25,000, $40; targeted international member, $45. The amount of the dues allocated for a subscription is $8.00 for an individual membership. Institutional members: level one, $900; level two, $1,250; . IP address: level three, $1,750. Changes of address for members should be completed online or mailed to APSA Member Services, 1527 New Hampshire Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20036-1206. Subscription, Publishing, and Advertising Office Address: Cambridge University Press, One Liberty Plaza, New York, NY 10006; and (outside the United States, Canada, and Mexico) Cambridge University Press, Journals Fulfi llment Department, University Printing House, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8BS, England. Subscription Information: American Political Science Review (ISSN 0003-0554) is published quarterly in February, May, August, and November by Cambridge University Press (One Liberty Plaza, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10006) for the American Political Science Association. Periodicals postage ratepaid at New York, NY, and at additional mailing offices. Annual institutional electronic-only sub scription rate (2020) is US $1642 in the United States, Canada, and Mexico; £943 elsewhere. Annual institutional print-and-electronic subscription rate (2020) is US $1903 in the United States, Canada, and Mexico; £1080 elsewhere. American Political Science Review is sold only as part of a joint subscription with the Perspective on Politics and PS: Political Science & Politics. Single part rate (2020) is US $201 in the United States, Canada, and Mexico; £114 elsewhere. Send address changes in the USA, Canada, and Mexico to: American Political Science Review, https://www.cambridge.org/core Cambridge University Press, Journals Fulfillment Department, One Liberty Plaza, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10006. Send address changes elsewhere to American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, Journals Fulfillment Department, One Liberty Plaza, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10006. © American Political Science Astsociation 2020. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, in any form or by any means, electronic, photocopying, or otherwise, without permission in writing from Cambridge University Press. Policies, request forms, and contacts are available at http://www.cambridge.org/rights/permissions/permission.htm Permission to copy (for users in the U.S.A.) is available from Copyright Clearance Center, http://www.copyright.com, email: [email protected] Downloaded from American Political Science Review Volume 114, Number 3, August 2020 Table of Contents NOTES FROM THE EDITORS .............................................................. v ARTICLES Administrative Records Mask Racially Biased Policing https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000581 . Dean Knox, Will Lowe, and Jonathan Mummolo ................................................. 619 Agenda Seeding: How 1960s Black Protests Moved Elites, Public Opinion and Voting Omar Wasow ...................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • US Racial Politics II New Deal to the Present
    U.S. Racial Politics: New Deal to the Present Political Science 449/549 CRN: 37625 Professor: Joseph Lowndes Office: PLC 919 email: [email protected] Graduate Employee: Course description: In this course, we will examine the ways that race shaped the major political dynamics in the United States from the Great Depression to the present. Materials: There are two books for this course, available in the bookstore. The books are The Unsteady March, by Philip Klinkner and Rogers Smith; and When Affirmative Action Was White, by Ira Katznelson. PS 5549 will have one additional text: Lowndes, Novkov and Warren, eds. Race and American Political Development. All other readings will be available on Canvas. Requirements for 449: This is a heavy reading course 1. Seven in-class quizzes. These quizzes will assess your comprehension of the assigned reading, lectures and class discussions. Your lowest two scores will be dropped. No make-up quizzes are possible. (50% of final grade) 2. Midterm in-class exam (25% of final grade) 3. Final exam (25% of final grade) 4. Participation: Students will be expected to attend class and participate in class discussions. Constructive, informed, respectful participation that contributes directly to conversations about the course material will raise borderline grades; lack of participation may result in lower grades. Requirements for 549: Research paper 18-20 pages, due Wednesday of Finals Week. Meet with me by 4th week with thesis topic to discuss. Policies: Students with disabilities. If you have a documented disability and anticipate needing accommodations in this course, please make arrangements to meet with the professor soon.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to American Political Culture
    Bellevue College INTRODUCTION TO AMERICAN POLITICAL CULTURE Political Science 160/Cultural & Ethnic Studies 160 Item 5361 A (POLS 160) or 5638 (CES 160) (Five Credits)1 Winter 2011 (Jan. 3-March 22), 11:30 a.m.-12:20 p.m. (L-221) Dr. T. M. Tate (425) 564-2169 [email protected] Office: D-200C Office Hours: See MyBC course site Pre-requisite: None Course Description This course treats the ways in which American cultural patterns influence and shape political outcomes and public policy. Study of the political culture may shed light on the nature of the political struggles and on the policy process in general. Political outcomes in the United States are not random but are structured and connected by certain enduring values. We seek answers to questions such as: How do Americans thinks about government, political institutions, social welfare, and the market? What are the origins and sources of American political culture? How has it changed over time, and what factors account for this change? How is American political culture distinctive, and how is it being reshaped in a time of globalization? In the process of this broad inquiry, we necessarily treat concepts such as democracy, liberty, individualism, American “exceptionalism,” political community, and political culture itself. Learning Outcomes On completion of this course, you should be able to: Explain the concept of political culture and its relevance to contemporary political society. 1 One credit hour of this course is online via MyBC. Identify the core values in American political culture and understand their influences on political life. Demonstrate how the political culture influences and shapes American politics and the policy process.
    [Show full text]
  • Citizenship Denationalized (The State of Citizenship Symposium)
    Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies Volume 7 Issue 2 Article 2 Spring 2000 Citizenship Denationalized (The State of Citizenship Symposium) Linda Bosniak Rutgers Law School-Camden Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ijgls Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Bosniak, Linda (2000) "Citizenship Denationalized (The State of Citizenship Symposium)," Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies: Vol. 7 : Iss. 2 , Article 2. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ijgls/vol7/iss2/2 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Citizenship Denationalized LINDA BOSNIAK° INTRODUCTION When Martha Nussbaum declared herself a "citizen of the world" in a recent essay, the response by two dozen prominent intellectuals was overwhelmingly critical.' Nussbaum's respondents had a variety of complaints, but central among them was the charge that the very notion of world citizenship is incoherent. For citizenship requires a formal governing polity, her critics asserted, and clearly no such institution exists at the world level. Short of the establishment of interplanetary relations, a world government is unlikely to take form anytime soon. A good thing too, they added, since such a regime would surely be a tyrannical nightmare.2 * Professor of Law, Rutgers Law School-Camden; B.A., Wesleyan University; M.A., University of California, Berkeley; J.D., Stanford University.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Quotas, Norms, and Politics
    Politics & Gender, 2 (2006), 101–128. Printed in the U.S.A. CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON GENDER AND POLITICS Gender Quotas II In the previous issue, scholars Jane Mansbridge, Mark P. Jones, and Miki Caul Kittilson addressed a series of questions about gender quota laws. Are quotas a good idea? Should more countries adopt them? Should the United States consider them? In this issue, three additional scholars weigh in. Lisa Baldez considers the pros and cons of gender quota laws on the basis of research she has done on the adoption and implementation of a gender quota law in Mexico. Mona Lena Krook maintains that the adoption of gender quota laws often reveals the deep-rooted nature of gender discrim- ination in existing processes of candidate recruitment. Finally, Medha Nani- vadekar reflects on the lessons that can be drawn about gender quota laws from the example of the reserved seats for women in India, a measure that “created 1 million slots for women.” The Pros and Cons of Gender Quota Laws: What Happens When You Kick Men Out and Let Women In? Lisa Baldez, Dartmouth College Gender Quotas, Norms, and Politics Mona Lena Krook, Washington University in St. Louis Are Quotas a Good Idea? The Indian Experience with Reserved Seats for Women Medha Nanivadekar, Shivaji University Published by Cambridge University Press 1743-923X/06 $12.00 for The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association. © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association. DOI: 10.1017/S1743923X06061010 101 102 Politics & Gender 2(1) 2006 The Pros and Cons of Gender Quota Laws: What Happens When You Kick Men Out and Let Women In? Lisa Baldez, Dartmouth College What country currently boasts the highest percentage of women in par- liamentary office? If you ask most people, they will guess one of the Nordic countries: Sweden, Norway, Finland, or Denmark.
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Movements and Democratic Transition in Chile, Brazil, East
    The City University of New York !"#$%&'()"*$#$%+'(,%-(.$#"/0,+1/(20,%'1+1"%(1%(3415$6(70,8156(9,'+(:$0#,%;6(,%-(<"5,%- =>+4"0?'@A(B1',(7,5-$8 C">0/$A(3"#D,0,+1*$(<"51+1/'6(E"5F(GH6(I"F(G(?=D0F6(JKKG@6(DDF(JHGLJMJ <>N51'4$-(N;A(Ph.D. Program in Political Science of the City University of New York C+,N5$(OPBA(http://www.jstor.org/stable/4150176 . =//$''$-A(KQRKSRJKQQ(QSAGK Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at . http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=phd. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Women's Numbers Elevate Women's
    Why Women’s Numbers Elevate Women’s Influence, and When They Don’t: Rules, Norms and Authority in Political Discussion Christopher F. Karpowitz, Tali Mendelberg, and Lauren Mattioli Abstract: Critical mass theory argues that women’s numbers are a major cause of women’s status and authority in a group. Applications of the theory to political settings have yielded mixed support for the theory. We unpack one mechanism that can explain when, why and how numbers aid women. That mechanism is the norm of communication during group discussion. Our focus is on how women build or lose authority while they interact with men. We argue that numbers – and group procedures – shape norms that advance or hinder women’s authority. Women’s authority in turn affects the group’s decision about economic redistribution – the higher women’s authority, the higher the group’s generosity to the poor. We suggest that future work further explore how rules and norms affect women’s status in a group by equalizing their participation and influence, with the ultimate goal being equal gender authority. Keywords: gender, norms, groups, deliberation, critical mass, decision rule, majority, unanimity, gender composition, authority, influence Introduction Political psychology naturally locates the individual at the heart of politics, and so it is no wonder that it investigates gender as a feature of the individual. Venerable questions in that tradition include: how a woman thinks about politics (Burns and Kinder 2012; Burns et al. 2001; Huddy et. al 2008; Sapiro 2003), votes (Dolan 1998; Kaufmann 2006; Kaufmann and Petrocik 1999; Mueller 1988; Steffensmeier, et al.
    [Show full text]
  • American Political Science Review
    AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW AMERICAN https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000060 . POLITICAL SCIENCE https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms REVIEW , subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at 08 Oct 2021 at 13:45:36 , on May 2018, Volume 112, Issue 2 112, Volume May 2018, University of Athens . May 2018 Volume 112, Issue 2 Cambridge Core For further information about this journal https://www.cambridge.org/core ISSN: 0003-0554 please go to the journal website at: cambridge.org/apsr Downloaded from 00030554_112-2.indd 1 21/03/18 7:36 AM LEAD EDITOR Jennifer Gandhi Andreas Schedler Thomas König Emory University Centro de Investigación y Docencia University of Mannheim, Germany Claudine Gay Económicas, Mexico Harvard University Frank Schimmelfennig ASSOCIATE EDITORS John Gerring ETH Zürich, Switzerland Kenneth Benoit University of Texas, Austin Carsten Q. Schneider London School of Economics Sona N. Golder Central European University, and Political Science Pennsylvania State University Budapest, Hungary Thomas Bräuninger Ruth W. Grant Sanjay Seth University of Mannheim Duke University Goldsmiths, University of London, UK Sabine Carey Julia Gray Carl K. Y. Shaw University of Mannheim University of Pennsylvania Academia Sinica, Taiwan Leigh Jenco Mary Alice Haddad Betsy Sinclair London School of Economics Wesleyan University Washington University in St. Louis and Political Science Peter A. Hall Beth A. Simmons Benjamin Lauderdale Harvard University University of Pennsylvania London School of Economics Mary Hawkesworth Dan Slater and Political Science Rutgers University University of Chicago Ingo Rohlfi ng Gretchen Helmke Rune Slothuus University of Cologne University of Rochester Aarhus University, Denmark D.
    [Show full text]
  • Solidarity and the Promo
    16 inequality and solidarity iwmpost continued from page 13 cio-economic inequality, the Euro- access to power, or does it take the peans looked to their governments Commemoration agency of the disadvantaged them- and the EU for redistributive poli- Ceremony selves? Katherine Newman’s analysis cies. As Claus Offe remarked: “We of the effects of taxation in the US can legislate standards for clean air; On the first evening of the con- Solidarity and the Promotion of Good Life below the federal level demonstrat- why does it not seem possible to leg- ference, a commemoration ceremony ed how state actions can create, or islate for lower Gini coefficients?” ◁ in memoriam Krzysztof Michalski at least exacerbate, inequality. Alfred 1) OECD: Divided We Stand. Why (1948–2013), founding Rector of Gusenbauer pointed out in his con- Inequality Keeps Rising, 2011. the IWM, took place at the Museum report 2) of Applied Arts Vienna. In his cluding remarks that, furthermore, Congressional Budget Office: Trends in the Distribution of Household Income between memory, Michael Sandel, Anne T. people are much more critical of the 1979 and 2007, 2011. and Robert M. Bass Professor of The economic downturn and the rigorous austerity Government at Harvard University inequalities created by the state than 3) Richard G. Wilkinson and Kate Pickett: and member of the IWM Academic policies that followed the banking and financial crisis of those created by the markets. How- The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better, Bloomsbury Press: Advisory Board, gave a lecture on ever, in their suggested solutions, London, 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • SOC 585: Racial and Ethnic Politics in the US
    Spring 2018 Prof. Andra Gillespie 217E Tarbutton 7-9748 [email protected] Office Hours: Wednesdays 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. (12-2 p.m. the first Wednesdays of the month) or by appointment Emory University Department of Political Science SOC 585/POLS 585 Racial and Ethnic Politics in the US This course is designed to introduce graduate students to some of the canonical readings, both historical and contemporary, in racial and ethnic politics. While African American politics will be a central theme of this course, this course intentionally introduces students to key themes in Latino/a and Asian American politics as well. By the end of the course, students should be conversant in the major themes of racial and ethnic politics in the US. Required Readings The following books have been ordered and are available at the Emory Bookstore: Cathy Cohen. 1999. The Boundaries of Blackness. Michael Dawson. 1994. Behind the Mule. Megan Francis. 2014. Civil Rights and the Making of the Modern American State. Lorrie Frasure-Yokeley. 2015. Racial and Ethnic Politics in American Suburbs. Christian Grose. 2011. Congress in Black and White. Ian Haney-Lopez. 1997, 2007. White By Law. Carol Hardy-Fanta et al. 2016. Contested Transformation: Race, Gender and Political Leadership in 21st Century America. Rawn James. 2013. Root and Branch. Donald Kinder and Lynn Sanders. 1994. Divided by Color. Taeku Lee and Zoltan Hajnal. 2011. Why Americans Don’t Join the Party. Michael Minta. 2011. Oversight. Stella Rouse. 2013. Latinos in the Legislative Process Katherine Tate. 2010. What’s Going On? Katherine Tate.
    [Show full text]
  • Does the U.S. Constitution Need an Equal Rights Amendment?
    Dartmouth College Dartmouth Digital Commons Open Dartmouth: Published works by Dartmouth faculty Faculty Work 1-2006 Does the U.S. Constitution Need an Equal Rights Amendment? Lisa Baldez Dartmouth College Lee Epstein Washington University Andrew D. Martin Washington University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.dartmouth.edu/facoa Part of the American Politics Commons Dartmouth Digital Commons Citation Baldez, Lisa; Epstein, Lee; and Martin, Andrew D., "Does the U.S. Constitution Need an Equal Rights Amendment?" (2006). Open Dartmouth: Published works by Dartmouth faculty. 1765. https://digitalcommons.dartmouth.edu/facoa/1765 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Work at Dartmouth Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Dartmouth: Published works by Dartmouth faculty by an authorized administrator of Dartmouth Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Does the U.S. Constitution Need an Equal Rights Amendment? Lisa Baldez, Lee Epstein, and Andrew D. Martin ABSTRACT For over 3 decades, those engaged in the battle over the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA), along with many scholarly commentators, have argued that ratification of the amendment will lead U.S. courts (1) to elevate the standard of law they now use to adjudicate claims of sex discrimination, which, in turn, could lead them (2) to find in favor of parties claiming a denial of their rights. We investigate both possibilities via an examination of constitutional sex discrimination litigation in the 50 states—over a third of which have adopted ERAs. Employing methods especially developed for this investigation, we find no direct effect of the ERA on case outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Albert Shaw of the Review of Reviews
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Political History History 1974 Albert Shaw of the Review of Reviews Lloyd J. Graybar Eastern Kentucky University Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Thanks to the University of Kentucky Libraries and the University Press of Kentucky, this book is freely available to current faculty, students, and staff at the University of Kentucky. Find other University of Kentucky Books at uknowledge.uky.edu/upk. For more information, please contact UKnowledge at [email protected]. Recommended Citation Graybar, Lloyd J., "Albert Shaw of the Review of Reviews" (1974). Political History. 15. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_political_history/15 Albert Shaw of the Review of Reviews This page intentionally left blank Albert Sha-w of the Review of Reviews * * * * * An lntel/ectua/ Biography Lloyd ]. Graybar The University Press of Kentucky ISBN: 978-0-8131-5271-4 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 73-80464 Copyright © 1974 by The University Press of Kentucky A statewide cooperative scholarly publishing agency serving Berea College, Centre College of Kentucky, Eastern Kentucky University, Georgetown College, Kentucky Historical Society, Kentucky State University, Morehead State University, Murray State University, Northern Kentucky State College, Transylvania University, University of Kentucky, University of Louisville, and Western Kentucky University. Editorial and Sales Offices: Lexington, Kentucky 40506 To the memory of M and M This page intentionally left blank Contents Acknowledgments tx Preface xt 1 Buckeye and Hawkeye, 1857-1881 1 2 At the Johns Hopkins and Elsewhere, 1882-1884 16 3 In Minneapolis and Abroad, 1884-18go 30 4 Dr. Shaw and His Review) 1891-1920 46 5 The Ideal City, 1891-1900 70 6 The Average Man 91 7 Hand in Hand with T.
    [Show full text]
  • Women and the American Political Process Winter 2018
    Department of Political Science POSC259: Women and the American Political Process Winter 2018 Contact Information Course Instructor: Professor Jennifer Merolla Office: Watkins Hall 2222 Phone: 951-827-4612 E-mail: [email protected] Office hours: Mondays, 11:30 to 1:00, or by appointment Course Schedule Semester: Winter 2018 Meeting day, time: Fridays, 10:10-1:00 Course Location: Watkins 2145 Course Description This course is a general introduction to the field of women and politics. We will examine the ways in which gender enters and shapes politics, primarily in the U.S. context. We begin by defining and conceptualizing gender and considering women’s group consciousness and how that shapes activism. We then look more closely at women as citizens with respect to their voting behavior and mass opinions. The next part of the course deals with women as candidates, exploring various barriers to female candidates, as well as opportunities. The final section of the course considers gender and representation in government and policymaking. The class format is a seminar, and thus is largely based on class discussion. Background Preparations (Prerequisites) There are no prerequisites for this course. Student Learning Outcomes: By the end of this course, students will be able to: 1. Understand the major strands of research in women and politics. 2. Critically assess the academic literature on women and politics. 3. Integrate the academic literature on women and politics. 4. Develop an original research paper/project in women and politics. 5. Refine communication skills in seminar participation and assignments. 6. Improve writing skills in course assignments.
    [Show full text]