Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 1984. 22:361-96 Copyright © 1984 by Annual Reviews Inc. All rights reserved

WALL-LESS PROKARYOTES OF PLANTS

J. M. Bove

Laboratoire de Biologie Cellulaire et Moleculaire, INRA et Universite de Bordeaux II, Domaine de la Grande Ferrade, 33140 Pont de la Maye, France

MYCOPLASMA-LIKE ORGANISMS AND SPIROPLASMAS: HISTORICAL ASPECTS AND DEFINITIONS

The first mention of an association between wall-less prokaryotes and plants was published by Doi et al (53) in Japanese in 1967 in a work entitled, "Mycoplasma or PLT:group-like microorganisms found in the phloem ele­ ments of plants infected with mulberry dwarf, potato witches' broom, aster yellows, or paulownia witches' broom."J Similar microorganisms had been seen at about the same time in rice infected with yellow dwarf disease (121). When plants containing the newly discovered microorganisms were given tetracycline treatments, symptom remission occurred as long as the antibiotic application lasted, and the observed microorganisms disappeared temporarily from the phloem of these plants (76, 121). Penicillin treatments had no effect. These results have been amply confirmed (108, 153). Because mycoplasmas were known to be sensitive to tetracycline but not penicillin, whereas the PLT agents were affected by both of these antibiotics (7, 75; see also 50), the microorganisms found by the Japanese workers were considered mycoplasma­ by UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - Smathers Library on 11/04/09. For personal use only.

Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1984.22:361-396. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org like and not chlamydiae-like and have been called mycoplasma-like organisms (MLOs).2 Similar MLOs have since been found to be associated with more than 100 diseases in plants (103). Mycoplasmas and permanent (irreversible) L-variants (161) of bacteria have

'PLT refers to psittacosis-lymphogranuloma-trachoma; the agents of these diseases are the Chlamydiae, a group of obligate intracellular parasites with a Gram-negative type of cell envelope. 2The triviallenn mycoplasma in the phrase MLO is used as a synonym for mollicute and does not imply the genus Mycoplasma. The name mollicute was first proposed in 1967 (59).

361 0066-4286/84/0901-0361 $02. 00 362 BOVE

the same morphology, ultrastructure, filterability, colony type, and behavior toward tetracycline and penicillin (see 50). The differences between L-variants and mycoplasmas lie in their immunological, biochemical, and genomic prop­ erties. These properties cannot be evaluated at the present time, because the agents first discovered by Doi et al have not yet been cultured. Whether these agents are mycoplasma-like or permanent L-variants remains to be seen; in this presentation they will be called MLOs. The term MLO, as used here, refers to pleiomorphic, wall-less prokaryotic microorganisms morphologically and ultrastructurally resembling L-variants or non-helical mycoplasmas and lo­ cated in the sieve tubes of plants carrying symptoms such as leaf yellows (hence the name yellows diseases), leaf mottling, leaf dwarfing, flower virescence, flower dwarfing, witches' brooms, internode shortening, stunting, etc. This definition excludes: (a) pathogenic, sieve-tube-restricted mycoplasmas with helical morphology (the spiroplasmas Sp iroplasma citri and com stunt spiro­ plasma); (b) sieve tube-restricted bacteria-like agents such as the organisms associated with citrus greening (11) or clover club leaf (180) diseases; (c) xylem-confined bacteria such as the Pierce's disease agent (73, 74); and (d) the mollicutes (Acholeplasma sp., Mycoplasma sp., and Sp iroplasma sp.) that occur on the surface of plants and flowers (see below). Being constantly associated with diseased plants but never present in healthy plants, MLOs fulfill the first of Koch's postulates. Since they have never been raised in culture or in a highly purified form, Koch's remaining postulates have not yet been satisfied. There is strong circumstancial evidence that the MLOs are the actual agents of disease, however (96). Strictly speaking, the only wall-less prokaryotes that have been grown in culture and shown to be agents of diseases in plants are the two helical mollicutes: S. cirri, the causal agent of citrus stubborn disease, and com stunt spiroplasma (CSS). Citrus stubborn disease and com stunt have played an important role in the discovery of spiroplasmas. The work on com stunt has revealed the existence of the helical filaments n�med spiroplasmas as well as their constant association with the disease (51). Citrus infected with the stubborn agent was the first plant from which a mollicute was consistently

by UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - Smathers Library on 11/04/09. For personal use only. cultured in California(63) and in France (142, 143). The work from France was Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1984.22:361-396. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org presented at the Symposium on Pathogenic Mycoplasmas at the CIBA Founda­ tion in London in January 1972 (144), where E. A. Freundt from Denmark, D. Taylor-Robinson from England, and J. G. Tully from the US agreed to participate in the characterization of the stubborn organism. One unexpected result of this rewarding international cooperativeeffort was Tully's findingthat the citrus agent was helical and motile and resembled in this respect the not-yet cultured com stunt spiroplasma. This was the first link established between citrus stubborn and com stunt, which hitherto were considered completely foreign to each other. Now their comparative study would yield complementary WALL-LESS PROKARYOTES 363

results and pave the road for the discovery of many more representatives of this new, unexpected group of helical, motile mollicutes. Several review articles have dealt with the discovery of MLOs and spiroplasmas (8, 10, 14, 24, 50, 96, 146, 180). When it was first described (83,84), the agent of citrusgreening disease was thought to be mycoplasma-like, but researchers soon realized that this was not so (143). We now know from in situ studies that this as-yet uncultured prokaryote has a cell wall of the Gram-negative type comprised of an outer membrane and a peptidoglycane layer (65, 68). This explains the symptom remission observed with the penicillin treatment of greening-affected citrus plants (5, 11). The phloem-restricted clover club leaf organism is also a bacterium (180, 188). No media for the cultivation of the greening organism or the clover club leaf agent are known at this time. These two organisms being bacteria-like, they will not be discussed here. The culture and characterization of the two plant pathogenic spiroplasmas, S citri (63, 145) and CSS (25, 187), have led to the discovery of many more spiroplasmas. Understandably, much more work has been devoted to spiroplas­ mas in general than to the as-yet uncultured MLOs. Reviews and articles on spiroplasmas cover their cultivation (17, 24,88); their description, properties, and host range (14,43, 97, 98, 179); their classification and taxonomy (46,48, 77, 172, 178, 182, 184); their cellular and molecular biology (14); their interaction with plant, arthropod, and animal hosts (170); the ecology of spiroplasma diseases (179); the mechanism of spiroplasma pathogenicity (35); the host range of S. citri (20, 128); and stubborn disease (70). Other papers embrace broader subjects: mycoplasmas and yellows diseases (103); mycoplas­ mas, spiroplasmas, and vascular-limited bacteria as plant pathogens (47, 125); mycoplasma infections of plants (9, 10); mycoplasma-plant-insect interrela­ tionships (101,131, 16 9, 181); control of vector-bornemycoplasmas (99, 108, 153); and the evolution of wall-less prokaryotes (95). Finally, Volume 3 of The Mycoplasmas (183) is devoted entirely to plant and arthropod MLOs and spiroplasmas and much information on techniques used in the study of molli­ cutes can be found in Methods in Mycoplasmology (140, 171) and in Plant and

by UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - Smathers Library on 11/04/09. For personal use only. Insect Mycoplasma Techniques (37). This article will present recent advances Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1984.22:361-396. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org and current research approaches in the study of wall-less prokaryotes of plants. The literature on new MLO diseases (106, 107, 124) and new epidemics (93) is not covered.

SPIROPLASMA CLASSIFICATION

The taxonomical description of spiroplasmas in Table l1llustrates the progress made in the last ten years in the exploding fieldof spiroplasmology. Beside the eleven well-defined groups listed there, several other groups or subgroups Table 1 Spiroplasma classification"

Principal DNA homology with (%) Proteins shared with (%) Group or strains G+C Principal Common or binomial name subgroup (ATCC number) (mol %) S.

Spiroplasma citri complex

Citrus stubborn spiTOplasma I-I R8A2(27556) 25-27 100 100 Dicots, leafhoppers Citrus stubborn, Horse- (S. citri) CI89(27665) radish brittle root Israel

Honeybee spiropl asma 1-2 AS 576(29416) 25-27 65 45 Bees Honeybee spiroplas- BC-3(33219) mosis Corn stunt spiroplasma 1-3 1-747(29051) 25-27 49 28 Maize, leafhoppers Corn stunt E275(29320) B655(33289)

277F spiroplasrna 1-4 277F(29761 ) 25-27 18 15 Rabbit tick None known Green leaf bug spiroplasma 1-5 LB-12(33649) 25-27 nd 27 Green leaf bug None known Maryland flower spiro- 1-6 M55(33502) (28-29)b 17 26 Flowers None known plasma ET-I Eristalis fly Cocos spiroplasma 1-7 N525(33287) 25-27 nd 19 Cocos surface None known Periwinkle spiroplasma 1-8 P40 25-27 nd nd Unknown Periwinkle disease Sex ratio organisms II WSRO, NSRO 25-27 Drosophila Sex-ratio trait Spiroplasma floricola III 23-6(29989) 25-27 Rowers, insects Lethargie of beetles. BNRI(33220) OBMG(33221) by UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - Smathers Library on 11/04/09. For personal use only. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1984.22:361-396. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org Spiroplasma apis complex IV B31(33834) 29--31 100 100 Honeybees May disease FI2 29--31 95 91 Flowers FI6 29--31 89 73 Flowers FI 29--31 83 55 Flowers F2 29--31 85 55 Flowers L89 29--31 89 49 Spittelbug None known PPSI(33450) 29--31 80 52 Flowers None known SR3(33095) 29--3 I nd Flowers None known

.spiropJasma 'mirum V SMCA(29335) 29--3 I Rabbit.tick Suckling mouse cataract GT-48(29334) TP-2(33503)

Ixodes spiroplasma VI Y32(33835) 24-26 Ixodes licks None known Monobia spiroplasma VII MQ-1(33825) (27-29)b Monobia wasp None known Syrphid spiroplasma VIII EA-I(33826) 29--31 Eristalis fly None known Cotinus spiroplasma IX CN·5(33827) 29--31 Cotinus beetle None known Mosquilo spiroplasma X AES-1 25-27 Aedes mosquito None known Monobia spiroplasma XI MQ-4 25-27 Monobia wasp None known

aBased on (12,31,77,116,117,17la, 184, P. Carle-Junca, J. M. Bove, unpublished data) bStill under investigation by UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - Smathers Library on 11/04/09. For personal use only. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1984.22:361-396. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org 366 HOVE

presently are being studied, and many more spiroplasmas probably remain to be discovered. Flowers and plant surfaces have proven to be rich sources of spiroplasmas (see below), and new spiroplasmas have recently been found in diverse insect hosts (31). It is likely that many of these microorganisms are inhabitants of the intestines of insects and are transmitted from insect to insect by contamination of the plant surface (31). However, until now only two spiroplasmas have been discovered to be pathogenic to plants, S. citri (sub­ group 1-1) and CSS (Subgroup 1-3). Following a serological analysisof the then-current spiroplasma strains (48), Junca et al proposed the first extensive classification of these organisms in 1980 (77) and included five groups, I-V. This scheme was subsequently revised to include several newly discovered spiroplasmas (184), bringing the number of groups to eight. Table 1, showing eleven groups, is the most recent version of the spiroplasma classification and incorporates new data (12,31, 115-117, 182). It is also the result of a trulyinternational collaborative effort. In Table 1, spiroplasma groups and subgroups are defined not only on the basis of serolog­ ical distinctions (182, 184), but also on recognized characteristics of spiroplas­ mal DNA, particularly the guanine plus cytosine (G + C) content and the DNA-DNA hybridization percentages (15, 77), as well as on spiroplasma protein patterns as defined by one- and two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (36, 117-120). All the spiroplasmas in Table 1 have been cultivated on artificial media except the Drosophila spiroplasmas (group II). The latter are also unique among spiroplasmas in that they are transmitted vertically through the egg. Some of the spiroplasmas are agents that had been grown previously on a variety of substrates but were misidentified as to their microbial nature. The 277F spiroplasma (subgroup 1-4) from rabbit ticks (18) was first grownin 1968 on an artificial medium and described as a spirochete (130). Two other isolates from rabbit ticks (SMCA and GT-48 of group V) were first grown in the chick embryo and described as a virus (27) and as a mycoplasma (190) before they were recognized as spiroplasmas (173, 174). However, most newly discovered spiroplasmas represent previously unknown agents that have been isolated primarily from insects or from the surfaces of

by UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - Smathers Library on 11/04/09. For personal use only. plants and flowers. Clark (30) was the first to find spiroplasmas at high titers in Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1984.22:361-396. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org the hemolymph of honey bees. This critical observation led to the search for spiroplasmas on the surfaces of flowers visited by foraging bees. Indeed, many such "flower" spiroplasmas have since been found, especially in the United States and France (see below). However, as important as the flowerhabitat has been in the discovery of new spiroplasmas, it seems apparent now that this habitat is only an occasional secondary result of the colonization of insects by these organisms (31). A detailed description of the various spiroplasmas in Table 1 is beyond the scope of this review. However, since the spiroplasmas of group I contain the WALL-LESS PROKARYOTES 367

organisms pathogenic to plants, they deserve further attention. Plant-surface spiroplasmas will be examined further below.

SPIROPLASMAS OF GROUP I

Origin and Host

Subgroup 1-1 of the spiroplasma classification is devoted to S. elm and subgroup 1-3 to CSS. Both of these spiroplasmas are confined to the phloem and are regarded as intracellular pathogens. Both organisms are transmitted by leafhopper vectors, with spiroplasma replication occurring within insect host tissues. Although S. citri causes an economically important disease in citrus (stubborn disease) and is associated with (45, 135) and responsible for (60) brittle root of horseradish, many other plants can be infected with the organism, and a number of plant hosts are susceptible to experimental infections (20, 128). In these infections, the disease is frequently more severe than in citrus infections, but S. citri has never been found to cause flower virescence or phyllody. In a few instances where S. citri has been isolated from plants showing virescence, mixed infections have been found (see below). CSS (subgroup 1-3) has a much smaller host range than S. citri. In addition to com (Zea mays L.) and Mexican teosinte (Z. mays L. mexieana), Z. perennis and Z. dipioperennis are susceptible to CSS (122). In addition, CSS has been transmitted experimentally by the leafhopper Euseelidius variegatus to peri­ winkle, broad bean (Viciafaba), and rye grass (Lotium sp.) (102). In the field, CSS is transmitted by Dalbulus maidis and D. elimatus. Other leafhoppers are experimental vectors (122). Com stunt is widespread through South, Central, and North America and has been reported in Jamaica by Eden-Green. It has never been reported in Europe and the Mediterranean area. In addition to CSS, com can also be infected by an MLO, the agent associated with maize bushy stunt (122). The first spiroplasmas identified in honey bees (30) were those assigned to subgroup 1-2. These organisms are pathogenic to the bee, and additional spiroplasmas identical to the bee isolates were later recovered from flower

by UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - Smathers Library on 11/04/09. For personal use only. surfaces (41, 48). However, in France a well-known disease of honey bees Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1984.22:361-396. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org (May disease) was found to be associated with group IV spiroplasmas (115, 116). Thus, spiroplasmas from two distinct groups are now clearly documented as bee pathogens. Subgroup 1-4 is represented at this point by a single spiroplasma (strain 277F) (18). Although this organism was recovered from rabbit ticks, additional isolates will be required to clearly establish the true host origin. Subgroup 1-5 spiroplasmas also contain a single representative (strain LB-12), recovered from the green leaf bug (Trigonotylus ruficornis) in Taiwan (87). Spiroplasmas in subgroup 1-6 represent three organisms recovered from the surface of flowers 368 BOVE

(185). Subgroup 1-7 contains two isolates from coconut palms (56, 58). In contrast to the intracellular location of S. citri and CSS, flower and plant spiroplasmas in subgroups 1-6 and 1-7 have been found only on plant surfaces. At this time, there is no evidence that these new subgroup members are associated with any plant disease. Finally, a new sieve-tube-restricted spiro­ plasma (see below), only the third such organism after S. citri and CSS, is tentatively classified in subgroup 1-8.

Genome Size and Guanine Plus Cytosine Content S. citri has been found to have a genome size close to 109 daltons (85, 145). Similar values have been found for group III and group IV spiroplasmas. The guanine plus cytosine (G + C) content of the DNA of strains within the group 1 complex has been examined extensively (15, 77, 85). The DNAs of most group I spiroplasmas, including those of subgroups 1-5 and 1-7 (P. Carle-Junca, unpublished observation) have been found to have 26 ± I mole percent G + C. The DNA of spiroplasma M55 (subgroup 1-6) was found to have a somewhat higher G + C content and needs further work.

Relatedness of Group I Spiroplasmas The spiroplasmas of the first three subgroups in Table 1 show significant heterologous crossing in all serological tests, including growth inhibition, deformation, metabolism inhibition, and ELISA (182, 184). Spiroplasma 277F (subgroup 1-4) clearly crossreacts in'a number of serological procedures with the com stunt spiroplasma E275 (subgroup 1-3) and with spiroplasmas of subgroups 1-5, 1-6, and 1-7 (184). Little or no serological cross has been observed between 277F and strains of eitherS. citri (subgroup 1- 1) or honey bee spiroplasmas (subgroup 1-2). DNA-DNA hybridization, EcoRI restriction enzyme analysis of DNA, and comparisons of spiroplasma protein maps support the serological results (12).

Classification and Pathogenicity S. citri (subgroup 1-1), the honey bee spiroplasma (subgroup 1-2), and CSS by UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - Smathers Library on 11/04/09. For personal use only.

Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1984.22:361-396. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org (subgroup 1-3) are aU clearly pathogenic organisms (Table 1). Since a number of susceptible and diseased hosts are readily available within each of these subgroups, a respectable collection of individual spiroplasma strains have become available for intragroup comparisons. Such comparisons have shown remarkable homogeneity within representatives of subgroups 1- 1,1-2, and 1-3. Thus, an individual spiroplasma strain within each of these subgroups can be specifically identified with a variety of techniques. This is possible despite the fact that these organisms show intergroup relatedness as measured by serology, DNA hybridization, and cell protein analysis. Subgroup1- 1 spiroplasma strains have received a specific taxonomic designation (S. citri). Since it is of con- WALL-LESS PROKARYOTES 369

siderable practical importance to distinguish between pathogenic spiroplasmas, and because differences in DNA-DNA homology are within acceptable levels for the erection of prokaryote species designations, Latin binomials for the honey bee spiroplasmas (subgroup 1-2) and com stunt spiroplasmas (subgroup 1-3) appear appropriate (12, 182). Assigning them such names amounts to elevating the spiroplasmas of subgroups 1-2 and 1-3 to the rank of species, as was proposed earlier (46).

SPIROPLASMA CITRI: A PATHOGEN AND A MODEL

For many reasons, S. cirri is probably the most studied of all the spiroplasmas. It was the first cultured mollicute of plant origin; moreover, cultures became available as early as 1970 and have been freely distributed for international collaboration. It is the causal agent of citrus stubborn disease, one of the major diseases of citrus in the Old as well as in the New World; it is also the cause of brittle root disease of horse radish in the eastern United States. It infects many plant species, and it is a model for biological and biochemical studies. The discovery of S. cirri plasmids opens the way to recombinant DNA technology and spiroplasma genetics. In the following paragraphs, emphasis will be put on recent results.

Growth and Division

S. citri grows from short elementary helices into longer parental helices that divide by constriction to produce elementary helices again (66). Membrane synthesis during growth and division can occur a priori over the entire surface of the organism or at specific growing zones. Researchers have investigated the question by pulse labeling the growing zones of the membrane with tritiated amino acids and by using quantitative high-resolution autoradiography to visualize the growing zones on the helices (67). The data obtained in this way suggest that S. citri helices grow and divide according to the scheme in Figure 1.

by UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - Smathers Library on 11/04/09. For personal use only. This growth model is very similar to the unit cell model described for Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1984.22:361-396. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org Escherichia coli (54). In this model, the organisms grow at one site when they are less than a certain critical length, and at two sites when they are more than this length. In the case of S. citri. the elementary helix can be compared to the unit cell defined for E. coli. In most species of mollicutes, DNA replication and cell division are not closely coordinated; however, in Mycoplasma gallisepticum cell division by binary fission is synchronous with DNA replication (132). In the case of S. citri, the elongation observed around the constriction zone may play a role in the segregation of DNA strands in the two newly formed elementary helices. 370 HOVE

� ------� ..... lhour Figure I Scheme for spiroplasma growth. The growing zones are represented by dark areas. For simplicity's sake. the helical morphology of the organism is not shown. An elementary helix with one blunt end and one tapered end (a) develops into an elementary helix with two blunt ends (b). Growth starts at one end. as represented by the dark area on the organism (e). At the same time. parental helicesready to divide (A) grow around the constriction (B) to yield two elementaryhelices with one blunt end and one labeled. tapered end (C). This tapered end may tum into a blunt end (C/). In agreement with the radioactive labeling data. the percentage of elementary helices with two blunt ends labeledat one end is 63%. while the percentage of helices with a labeled tapered end is 37%. The presence of elementary or parental helices labeledat two sites is explained on the right side of this figure. It implies that an elementary helix already labeled at one end grows into a four-tum parental helix and then becomes labeled in the middle at the place where a constriction will occur. This constriction will lead to the formation of two elementary helices. one with labels at both ends and one with a label at only one end.

Enzymesfor DNA Replication and Transcription S. citri has been shown to contain three DNA polymerases: ScA, ScH, and ScC (22, 23). These three enzymes have different elution properties on diethylami­ noethyl cellulose. ScA is not inhibited by N-ethylmaleimide (NEM), but both

ScB and ScC are NEM-sensitive. Ethanol slightly stimulates ScA , whereas

by UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - Smathers Library on 11/04/09. For personal use only. SeB and ScC are inhibited. Other comparative properties of the three enzymes Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1984.22:361-396. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org have been studied. The honey bee spiroplasma BC3 (subgroup 1-2) and the flower spiroplasma BNR I (group III) also contain three DNA polymerases. Spiroplasma Be3 is serologically related to S. citri, the two sprioplasmas being members of group I (Table I). Interestingly, each of the three DNA polymerases of strain HC3 seems to be similar to the respective enzyme of S. citri. However. flowerspiroplasma BNRI. unrelated to S. citri, contains DNA polymerases showing some differences from those of S. citri. In any case, spiroplasmas have three DNA polymerases and in this respect they do not differ from bacteria. WALL-LESS PROKARYOTES 371

The situation is quite different with DNA-dependent RNA-polymerase. It is well known that the antibiotic rifampicin inhibits bacterial growth. In E. coli, rifampicin inhibits RNA transcription by binding to the B subunit of RNA­ polymerase. In contrast to test results on Eubacteria, none of the mollicutes tested was inhibited by rifampicin; those examinated were My coplasma mycoides, Ureaplasma urealyticum, Acholeplasma laidlawii (see also 38), S. citri, S. apis, and honey bee spiroplasma B88 (subgroup 1-2). Furthermore, the spiroplasma RNA-polymerases were purified to the stage where the enzyme required added DNA for activity and were tested for rifampicin sensitivity. While as little as 0.01 mg of the antibiotic inhibited 50% of the activity of theE. coli enzyme, concentrations as high as 100 mg were required for 50% inhibi­ tion of the spiroplasma RNA-polymerases (64). These results show that the spiroplasma enzymes are essentially insensitive to rifampicin. In preliminary experiments (A. Gadeau, C. Mouches, J. M. Bove, unpublished data), the subunit structure of the RNA-polymerase of spiroplasma B88 was compared with that of E. coli and Halohacterium halobium, a member of the Archaebac­ teria. The spiroplasma enzyme with four major subunits (130 kd, 117 kd, 49 kd, and 40 kd) had a structure resembling neither that of the Eubacteria nor of the Archaebacteria. The two large subunits (130 kd and 117 kd) were definitely smaller than the two large subunits ofE. coli (160 and 155 kd for subunits Band B' respectively). In conclusion, these results suggest that all mollicutes might be insensitive to rifampicin. This property would distinguish them from the Eubacteria but not from the Archaebacteria. According to recent hypotheses (see 95), mollicutes represent degenerate eubacterial forms and, instead of being primitive ances­ . tors of prokaryotes, can be regarded as the most highly evolved of the prokary­ otes. During this evolution, the property of RNA-polymerase to bind rifampi­ cin probably has been lost.

Ribosomal RNA Operons The eubacterial chromosome is known to carryseveral repeats of the ribosomal RNA (rRNA) operon. E. coli has seven and Bacillus subtilis at least ten rRNA

by UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - Smathers Library on 11/04/09. For personal use only. operons; H. halobium, an Archaebacterium, has only one. The number of Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1984.22:361-396. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org rRNA operons in the DNA of spiroplasmas and other mollicutes has been examined recently (139). First the DNA was digested with restriction endonu­ cleases. Then the fragmented DNA was electrophoresed in agarose-gels, trans­ ferred to nitrocellulose filters, and hybridized with a variety of DNA probes containing portions of one of the rRNA operons of E. coli. Analysis of the hybridization bands showed that spiroplasmas as well as all other mollieutes tested carry only one or two rRNA operons and that rRNA genes in molli­ cutes are linked together in the same fashion as in E. coli: that is, 16 S-23 S-5 S. The data also imply a marked nucleotide sequence homology along 372 BOVE

the rRNA operon of E. coli and the RNA operons of the various mollicutes (139).

Presence of S. Citri Plasmid Sequences in Other Spiroplasmas Plasmids play a significant role in the biology of microorganisms in the functions for which they code (pathogenicity, antibiotic resistance, etc) and in their dissemination of genetic information. Many spiroplasmas, including several S. citri strains, contain plasmids of between 2 and 50 kilobase pairs (kbp) (3, 14, 138). However, so far all spiroplasma plasmids are cryptic, i.e. none has been associated with a given phenotypic character. Also, the ex­ perimental transfer of a plasmid from one spiroplasma to another has not yet been achieved and, more generally, transfer of genetic material between mollicutes has not yet been described. Two plasmids, pMHI with 7 kbp and 26 mol% G + C, and pM41 with 8 kbp and 22 mol% G + C, have been purified from S. citri strains MH and M4 respectively. The MH strain was cultured from a stubborn-affected sweet orange tree growing in Morocco, strain M4 from a naturally infected periwin­ kle also from Morocco. On the basis of G + C content and restriction enzyme mapping, the two plasmids are different. Using recombinant DNA technology, the linearized pMHI plasmid was introduced into E. coli plasmid vector pBR328 and was cloned in E. coli (110). This is the first time that a mollicute plasmid has been cloned in a bacterium. However, when used in similar experiments, plasmid pM41 could not be cloned. This plasmid is identical to plasmid pH 2000, which has been isolated from S. citri strain ASPI (3). Cloning experiments with pH 2000 have also failed. The reasons for these failures are unclear. Radioactive probes of plasmids pMH 1 and pM41 were used to investigate the occurrence of these plasmid sequences in other spiroplasmas. Plasmid pM41 from S. citri strain M4 was present in three additional S. citri strains (ASP!, Iran, Arizona) but was not present in several others, including strain MH, the source of pMHI. It also occurred in the following spiroplasmas: strain 275 of the CSS, tick spiroplasma 277 F, and Cocos spiroplasma N525 (113).

by UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - Smathers Library on 11/04/09. For personal use only. Plasmid pMHl was found as a free 7-kbp plasmid only in S. citri strain MH. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1984.22:361-396. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org Interestingly, however, the pMH 1 probe hybridized strongly with high molecu­ lar weight DNA of several S. citri strains and of strains of spiroplasmas other than S. citri. These results suggest that pMHI sequences might be integrated into the genome of these spiroplasma strains (111, 112).

Expression in E. Coli of the Spiralin Cistron of S. Citri Spiralin or protein 39 (120) is the major membrane protein of S. citri (186, 189) and is strongly antigenic. Rabbit antibodies against whole S. citri cells react strongly with spiralin (117). Several S. citri-specific monoclonal antibody WALL-LESS PROKARYOTES 373

(MCA)-producing clones have also been obtained; they have all been directed against spiralin (117). ELISA (29, 148) offers a convenient and sensitive technique for detecting S. citri proteins. It has been used to screen E. coli clones that were transformed with restricted S. citri DNA fragments inserted into E. coli plasmid vector pBR328 (C. Mouches, T. Candresse, C. Saillard, G. Barroso, J. M. Bove, unpublished data). One E. coli transformant reacted strongly in ELISA with S. citri polyclonal antiserum. The same transformant also reacted positively to monospecific antiserum against spiralin. The spiralin from E. coli has an electrophoretic mobility slightly smaller than that from S. citri. This result suggests that spiralin occurs in E. coli essentially as a preprotein, as do the results of tryptic digests. The restriction fragment coding for spiralin in E. coli measures 6.5 kbp and is much larger than required for spiralin expression. A strong promoter is probably present in the sequences flanking the spiralin cistron. Even though spiralin is specific to S. citri, the spiralin restriction fragment hybridizes with the DNA of all spiroplasmas tested. The flanking sequences are probably involved in this hybridization. These results show that at least one gene from S. citri, the spiralin gene, can be expressed in a bacterium. This opens the way to physical mapping of S. citri genes on the spiroplasma genome.

S. Citri Viruses in Plants and Their Effect on Symptom Expression There are three S. citri viruses. SpVl (89, 90) is a unenveloped rod 230--280 nm by 10--15 nm with circular, single-stranded DNA (J. Renaudin, J. M. Bove, unpublished data). SpV2 is a long-tailed polyhedron ch;:rracteristic of type B bacteriophages (32, 34). SpV3 is a short-tailed polyheqral virus with double-stranded linear DNA; it is peculiar in that it emerges from infected cells in buds of membranes (32, 33). Many S. citri isolates are infected with both SpVI and SpV3, and these viruses are often seen in primocultures of S. citri from citrus. SpV2 is seen much more rarely; it is specific to S. citri. However, Sp V 1 and Sp V3 have been seen in the cultures of many spiroplasmas other than

by UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - Smathers Library on 11/04/09. For personal use only. S. citri. Some S. citri cultures contain all three viruses. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1984.22:361-396. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org Recently, it was reported for the first time that viruses can be produced by spiroplasmas within infected host plants (1, 2). In these experiments, two strains of S. citri have been used. One, SP-A, is severe; once infected, plants die of lethal wilting within 12 weeks. The other .strain, SPV3, produces unusually mild symptoms and the plants live. Electron microscopy revealed that not only viruses similar to SpV3 (2) but also to SpVl and SpV2 (1) were produced in a periwinkle infected with the mild SPV3 strain of S. citri. Sap filtrates from this plant contained virus particles that gave rise to plaques on lawns of the lethal SP-A strain of S. citri. Periwinkle plants grafted first with 374 BOVE

the lethal strain and subsequently with the mild, virus-producing strain de­ veloped only mild symptoms and did not die. The dual-infected plants con­ tained relatively low concentrationsof spiroplasmas and high titers of virus; the spiroplasmas were distorted and swollen. These experiments suggest that spiroplasma viruses play a role in preventing the usual lethal effect of the severe strain of S. citri. They probably exert this action by decreasing the number and viability of the spiroplasmas within the plant. Dual infections of periwinkles with S. citri and MLOs also prevent lethal wilting (see below). A fourth spiroplasma virus, SpV4, was discovered recently in strainB63 of the honey bee spiroplasmas of subgroup 1-2. This strain was cultured from a honey bee that was captured from Morocco. The virus is isometric and has a diameter of 27 nm; its single-stranded DNA is circular and has a molecular weight of 1.5-1.7 x 106 d. SpV4 forms clear plaques on lawns of spiroplasma G1 (subgroup 1-2); it infects only spiroplasmas of subgroup 1-2 (J. Renaudin, M. C. Pascarel, J. M. Bove, unpublished data). Transfection of spiroplasma Gl with SpV4 DNA has been achieved (M. C. Pascarel, J. Renaudin, J. M. Bove, unpublished data). Viruses similar to SpV4 but specific to S. citri are being sought in S. citri isolates from stubborn-affected trees.

Interactions of Insect Cells in Culture with S. Citri and Other Spiroplasmas Insects are primary hosts for many mollicutes (31, 181), but little is known about the interactions between mycoplasmas and the cells, tissues, or organs of the insect hosts. Techniques and insect cell lines are now available to study these interactions in vitro. One Drosophila (Dm-I) and two leafhopper (AS-2 and AC-20) cell lines have been used to study the attachment and pathogenicity of spiroplasmas and mycoplasmas (162). Cytopathic effects have been observed with most of the spiroplasmas, leading to death of the insect cells. With dark field and DNA staining microscopy, adsorption of spiroplasmas to AS-2 and AC-20 cells has been detected. While spiroplasmas 277F (subgroup 1-4) and B88 (subgroup 1-2) adsorbed heavily, S. citri and CSS showed slight

by UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - Smathers Library on 11/04/09. For personal use only. adsorption. In addition, non-helical forms of S. citri and other spiroplasmas Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1984.22:361-396. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org within the leafhopper cells were shown to be present. The identity of the non-helical forms of S. citri was confirmed serologically by indirect immuno­ fluorescence. Intracellular location and non-helical morphology of spiroplas­ mas in insect cells corresponded with in vivo findings, Le. that in leafhopper tissues S. citri and CSS are not helical and reside inside the cells (92, 168). In AS-2 and AC-20.cuItures the titers measured with B88, 277F, BNRI, and PPS-l were similar to the ones in the fresh LB cell culture medium. CSS did not mUltiply. However, S. citri reached nearly two logs higher titers in AS-2 and AC-20 cultures than in fresh LB medium. WALL-LESS PROKARYOTES 375

S. citri was also shown to grow to higher titers in "conditioned" LB medium, in which AS-2 cells were grown for three days and then were removed by filtration,than in fresh LB medium alone. This and similar experiments suggest that the conditioned medium contains a cell-derived factor that stimulates the growth of S. citri. Studies along these lines might offer an approach to reinvestigating the culture of MLOs.

NATURAL TRANSMISSION OF S. CITRI AND THE DISCOVERY OF A NEW SIEVE- TUBE-RESTRICTED SPIROPLASMA

In California, the natural spread of S. citri and its implications for the control of stubborn diseasehave received much attention (19). Vector transmission of S. citri occurs mainly in the summer months and affects essentially young trees. The amount of spread can be particularly high in certain years; in these cases, stubbornepidemics result (70). Three leafhoppershave been shown in Califor­ nia to be vectors of S. citri: Neoaliturus (ex Circulifer) tenellus, Scaphytopius nitridus, and Scaphytopius acutus delongi (129). Obviously, the range of plants found to be naturally infected with S. citri depends on the nature of the leafhopper vectors prevalent in a given area. N. tenellus. the sugar beet leafhopper, seems to be one of the active S. citri vectors in California; it also transmits curly top virus. Transmission of S. citr; by N. tene/lus (91) and the relationship between the spiroplasma and the vector (92) have been carefully studied. S. citri can be cultured from N. tene/lus leafhoppers collected not only in Californiabut also in southcentral Washington, several hundred miles northof the citrus-growing area of California(12 9). N. tenellus has a wide distribution, being known in Central and North America from Mexico to Canada, in Florida and the West Indies, in South Africa, in the Mediterranean Basin and the Near East. Cruciferous plants are hosts of the leafhopper (20), and this factor might explain the large number of cruciferous plants found to be naturally infected with S. citri in California. In this connection, an interesting development has

by UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - Smathers Library on 11/04/09. For personal use only. occurred on the East Coast of the US. The causal agent of the long-known Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1984.22:361-396. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org brittle root disease of horseradish, a cruciferous plant, has recently been identifiedas S. citri, and one of the vectors is N. tenellus (60). Another vector is Macrosteles fascifrons, common in horseradish fields in Illinois (126). In Morocco, Syria, and Iraq, to mention only a few countries,citrus stubborn disease is widespread and in certain orchards a high proportion of trees are contaminated. The wide distribution of stubborn disease in the Mediterranean area and in the Near and Middle East is probably because diseased bud wood is used in these areas. A second reason is natural spread, for which experimental evidence is now available (123). For instance, in Morocco 24% of 264 peri- 376 BOVE

winkle plants near a sweet orange orchard were exposed to natural infection from July to October 1980. They were contaminated with S. citri. as demon­ strated by lethal wilting as well as by ELISA and culturing of the spiroplasma (9). In Syria, a great number of young sweet orange trees propagated from stubborn-free budwood were found infected with S. citri (16). These studies have been greatly facilitated by the fact that it is possible to detect S. citri using ELISA (29, 147-149) and culture of the organism. When mature citrus leaves from the summer flush of growth are collected in October, a high proportion of stubborn trees are found positive by both ELISA and culture of S. cirri (J. M. Bove, A. Fos, M. Gamier, C. Saillard, J. C. Vignault, unpublished data). Having anS. citri positive ELISA reaction on a sample from which a spiroplas­ rna culture also has been obtained is already serological evidence that the cultured spiroplasma is S. citri. The leafhoppers involved in the natural spread of S. citri in the Mediterra­ neanhave not yet been identified. N. tenellus, the California vector, is known to be present in Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Spain, and Morocco (61, 62). In several surveys of leafhoppersin Morocco, Turkey, and Syria beginning in 1978 (A. Fos, J. Bonfils,J. M. Bove, C. Saillard, J. C. Vignault, unpublished data), we foundN. tenellus in very few instances and in very small numbers. N. haematoceps. a closely related species, was present in somewhat higher num­ bers and was even one of the dominant leafhopper species caught in yellow traps placed in periwinkle beds near a stubborn-infected Valencia late sweet orange orchard in Morocco (A. Fos, unpublished data; 9). It is interesting to note that as early as 1953 Frazier (61) also found N. haematoceps to be the dominant form ofNeoaliturus. From these data it seems that N. haematoceps is a good vector candidate for the natural spread of S. citri in the Mediterranean area. In the Adana region of Turkey, where citrus stubborn is a serious problem, N. haematoceps. also named N. opacipennis. is a well-known leafhopper species; it is the supposed vector of beet curly top virus in Turkey. The case for its involvement in S. citri transmission has received strong support from work carried out in nearby Syria in October 1983 (1. M. Bove, A. Fos, M. Gamier, C. Saillard, J. C. Vignault, unpublished data). We found large

by UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - Smathers Library on 11/04/09. For personal use only. populations of N. haematoceps, unmixed with other leafhopperspecies, in one Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1984.22:361-396. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org particular biotope on Cheiranthus cheiri and Matthiola annua plants near Afamia in the Ghab region, a major sugar beet-producing region in Syria. Spiroplasma isolates were cultured from several samples of 10--15 insects from this group and identified as S. citri. Several samples of five insects also tested positively for S. citri in the ELISA test. In 1978, S. citri had been cultured from one sample ofN. haematoceps in Morocco (13). Experimental transmissions of S. citri by N. haematoceps is the next step. Spread of S. citri in Syria was studied by exposing periwinkle plants to natural infection in several locations during the summer of 1983 (1. M. Bove, WALL-LESS PROKARYOTES 377

A. Fos, M. Garnier, C. Saillard, J. C. Vignault, unpublished data). Symp­ tomatic periwinkles were analyzed for S. citri infection with ELISA and culture techniques. Helical and non-helical organisms in their sieve tubes were ex­ amined by electron microscopy. While some periwinkles showed a positive reaction to ELISA and gave a spiroplasma isolate identified as S. citri, other periwinkles yielded a spiroplasma culture but reacted negatively to ELISA for S. citri. The spiroplasma cultured from the ELISA-negative periwinkles, named P40, was examined for serological relatedness to other spiroplasmas using ELISA and metabolism inhibition. Spiroplasma P40 was found to be related to group I spiroplasmas and more particularly to spiroplasma LB12 (subgroup 1-5); we found no relationships with spiroplasmas of any other groups (C. Saillard, J. C. Vignault, J. M. Bove, R. F. Whitcomb, J. G. Tully, unpublished data). Sieve tubes of the periwinkles from which spiroplasma P40 was cultured were filled with helical organisms. These periwinkles, when examined with ELISA using an antiserum against spiroplasma P40, showed a strong positive reaction; under the same conditions S. citri-infected periwinkles had a negative reaction. These results show that spiroplasma P40 and the helical organism seen in the symptomatic Syrian periwinkles are the same. Hence, spiroplasma P40 is a sieve-tube-restricted organism, not a surface contaminant. It is also highly likely that spiroplasma P40 is a plant pathogen, although its pathogenicity will have to be confirmedby leafhopper transmissions of pure P40 culture to periwinkles. It is interesting to note that the P40 spiroplasma, as well as the two previously known sieve-tube­ restricted p'athogenic spiroplasmas, S. citri and the CSS, tum out to be mem­ bers of serogroup I spiroplasmas, P40 being confined to the new subgroup 1-8. Finally, the periwinkles from which spiroplasma P40 was cultured became infected as a result of natural transmission, very probably via leafhopper vectors. The original diseased host on which the insect vector acquired the P40 agent remains to be identified.

MLO AND THE PRESENCE OF MOLLICUTES ON THE SURFACE OF PLANTS AND FLOWERS by UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - Smathers Library on 11/04/09. For personal use only. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1984.22:361-396. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org In recent years one of the most interesting developments in the field of mollicute study has been finding that plants can carry true acholeplasmas, mycoplasmas, and spiroplasmas on their surfaces. These mollicutes are orphans in that they are not associated with diseases of the plants on which they are found. It may be, however, that they are not orphans in hosts other than plants, as will be shown below for three flower spiroplasmas. The presence of these orphan mollicutes also offers a possible explanation for earlier reports' that some groups of workers occasionally were able to cultivate mollicutes from diseased plants carrying sieve-tube MLOs while many others were not 378 HOVE

(69; see also 50). In some cases, the cultured mollicute might have been a contamination from ingredients used to prepare the growth medium; serum especially has been shown to be a source of contamination. But in other cases it is likely that the cultured mollicute could have been a surface organism.

Spiroplasmas Clark (30) discovered that a seasonal disease of honey bees occurring in May and June is due to a spiroplasma (Table 1, subgroup 1-2). He thought that the bees became contaminated while foraging on flowers and as a result started to look for spiroplasmas on such flowers. He was able to isolate spiroplasmas BNRI and OBMG from tulip tree and magnolia flowersrespectively (Table 1, serogroup III). but these were unrelated to the honey bee spiroplasmas. Many more flower spiroplasmas since have been discovered (42, 109, 114, 185,).

They fall into five groups or subgroups: 1-2, 1-6, 1-7, III, and IV.

SPIROPLASMAS OF SUBGROUP 1-2 The spiroplasmas of subgroup 1-2 have been cultured from two sources, infected honey bees and the surfaces of flowers. Some were isolated in the eastern United States from the flowers of Bidens pilosa (strains GI, G2) and Tilia americana (strain BW) (41, 44). Spiroplasmas of subgroup 1-2 also occur in France (114) on flowers(strain F3) and in honey bees (strains B24, B25, B27. B29, B62) and in California on flowers (136). The flower isolates from the United States and France were shown to be pathogenic in the honey bee. It is the first exampie of an orphan spiroplasma with no pathological role on the plant host that is pathogenic in an insect host.

SPIROPLASMAS OF SUBGROUP 1-6 Whitcomb (185) has recently isolated spiroplasmas from flowers in Maryland. Serology (185) and protein analysis (12) show these isolates to be somewhat related to one of the members of group I, the rabbit tick spiroplasma 277F, hence the tentative classification of these spiroplasmas in group I, subgroup 6.

by UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - Smathers Library on 11/04/09. For personal use only. SPIROPLASMAS OF SUBGROUP 1-7 Spiroplasmas of subgroup 1-7 were iso­ Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1984.22:361-396. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org lated from both healthy and lethal yellowing-diseased tissues of coconut palms (56, 58). They are serologically related to spiroplasmas 277F and BC3, and they represent a new subgroup (1-7) within the S. citri group (Table 1) (12).

SPIROPLASMAS OF GROUP III The spiroplasmas first isolated by Clark from tulip trees and magnolia flowers belongto serogroup III. Davis (40) has also cultured such spiroplasmas from tulip tree flowers and has proposed the name Sp iroplasma floricola for these agents (49). An interesting development has arisen from the work of Giannotti & Vago on WALL-LESS PROKARYOTES 379

the "lethargie" disease of cockchafer grubs (Melolontha melolontha) (17S). They were able to culture a spiroplasma from affected grubs and reproduced the disease by reinjecting the spiroplasma into normal grubs. Further investigation showed that the lethargy spiroplasma seems serologically identical to the flower spiroplasmas of serogroup III (J. G. Tully, J. M. Bove, J, Giannotti, unpublished results)! This is the second example of a spiroplasma harmless on its plant host but pathogenic in its insect host.

SPIROPLASMAS OF GROUP IV While the flower spiroplasmas of groups 1-2, 1-6, 1-7, and IIIhave DNA with 25-27 mole% (G + C), those of serogroup IV have a G + C content of 29-3 1%. The first spiroplasma of this group was isolated from the surface of powder puff (Calliandra haematocephala) flowers in Florida (the PPS I strain)(10 9) and tulip tree flowers in Connecticut (the SR3 strain) (40). These early flower isolations were followed by many others not only from the Central United States (185) but also from continental France (strains PI, P2, P4, PI2, F16) and Corsica (strain P2S) (77, 114, 176). Group IV spiroplasmas were also obtained from honey bees in Morocco (strain B13) and in California (136) and from froghoppers (Cercopidae) in Corsica (strain L89). Extensive serological work (117, I71a) as well as two-dimensional protein analysis on polyacrylamide gels (117) have been devoted to many of these spiroplasmas and have greatly contributed to the classification of these organisms in a new, distinctive group, group IV , A new development concerning the group IV spiroplasmas has occurred recently (114, 115, 116), Honey bees affected by a disorder resembling the classical May disease in southwesternPr ance were found to contain numerous spiroplasmas in their digestive tract and hemolymph. Two strains (B31 and B39) were cultured and shown to be pathogenic to the honey bee. They were characterized and found to be related to group IV members. Spiroplasmas nearly identical to the B3l and B39 strains were also recovered from the surfaces of fl owers collected within the area visited by bees from the diseased hives. The name Sp iroplasma ap is has been proposed for the group IV spiro­ plasmas (116). S. ap is is the third example of a spiroplasma harmless on its

by UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - Smathers Library on 11/04/09. For personal use only. plant host but pathogenic in its insect host. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1984.22:361-396. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org Acholeplasma and Mycoplasma Species Non-helical mollicutes have been cultured from tulip tree (39), melaleuca and jasmin (109), and Lactuca perennis (c. Saillard, J. C. Vignault, unpublished data) flowers.Presumed acholeplasmas related by serology but unrelated to any described species have been isolated from powder puff (PP2 strain), lemon (Ll strain), and grapefruit fl owers in Florida (1OS, 109); the G + C content of these acholeplasmas is 27%, lower than that of several known acholeplasmas, which is 32%. These three strains form a cluster, and the Ll strain (ATCC 33453) has 380 BOVE

been chosen as a type strain for the group. This group has been shown to be unrelated in DNA-DNA homology comparisons with the eight currently recog­ nized acholeplasma species (163). Several presumed acholeplasmas have also been cultured from flowers collected in the Central United States (185). These strains were serologically related to the Florida PP2 organism. All these isolates are tentatively identified as new strains of an unnamed mollicute species that appears to be widely distributed geographically on plant surfaces (185). Known species of Acholeplasma and Mycoplasma have also been isolated. A. occu/i, A. axanthum, A. laidlawii, and M. verecundum have been cultured from such vegetables as endive, cabbage, and broccoli purchased at supermar­ kets (160). The strains of A. axanthum isolated from coconut palms in Jamaica (57) are probably surface organisms and not the causal MLOs of coconut lethal yellowing, since McCoy has never been able to isolate A. axanthum from diseased palms in Horida (R. E. McCoy, personal communication). Similarly, a mollicute has been cultured (177) from aborted seeds of apples affected by proliferation, a disease characterized by the presence of MLOs in the sieve tubes. The triply cloned organism grows in simple media and requires cholesterol (J. G. Tully, unpublished data) . It is probably a member of the genus Mycoplasma. but no serological relationships with any of the known Mycoplasma species have been detected. Hence, the apple mycoplasma seems to be a new species. This coulc\ be considered an argument in favor of its involvement in proliferation disease, but there are at least two arguments against it: (a) only one apple isolate of the organism has been obtained so far, in spite of several isolation attempts, and (b) optimum growth temperature is close to 43°C, a temperature apparently too high to explain symptom expression in apple trees in the field.

LACK OF EVIDENCE FOR RELATEDNESS OF MLOs TO S. CITRI AND OTHER KNOWN MOLLICUTES

by UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - Smathers Library on 11/04/09. For personal use only. In their attempts to culture MLOs, researchers have sometimes obtained Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1984.22:361-396. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org mollicutes from MLO-infected plants. Cultures of A. laidlawii have been recovered from periwinkles infected with the phyllQdy-virescence MLO (69). The antiserum against thi� A. laidlawii strainshowed a strong positive reaction to antigens of the cultured organism during ELISA testing but a negative reaction to extracts of rhe phyllody periwinkle. Similar experiments (147) showed the stolbur MLO in periwinkles to be unrelated to a bovine mycoplas­ ma (Leach serogroup 7) recovered from the stolbur-affected periwinkles. In addition, ELISA showed that neither phyl�ody nor stolbur MLOs were related WALL-LESS PROKARYOTES 381

to A. axanthum, A. modicum, A. granularum, and A. occuli (147). Finally, 25 MLO strains found in periwinkles or other host plants showed negative ELISA results with antisera againSt S. citri and A. laidlawii (52). ELISA has also been widely used in the search for serological relationships between MLOs and S. citri. When carried out with S. citri antiserum, ELISA

showed strongpositive reactions toward crude homogenates of S. citri-infected periwinkles (4, 28, 29, 147-149), citrus (16, 71, 148, 149), and leafhoppers (4, 71, 147, 149). However, the reaction was negative not oilly with healthy plant material but also with extracts of periwinkles infected with the following MLOs: phyllody-virescence, stolbur-flower dwarfing, apple proliferation (Seemuller strain), virescence transmitted by dodder (Cuscuta campestris) from Opuntia tuna monstrosa to periwinkle, and chloraniy (149; c. Saillard, unpublished data). MLOs from apple, cabbage, gladiolus, hydrangea, primula, and European aster yellows, clover phyllody (Dutch and English strains) (28), and American aster yellows (104) also elicited a negative reaction. Hence, ELISA detected no serological relationship between MLOs and S. citri in particular . Another approach (164) also failed to detect a relationship between MLOs and S. citri or Sp iroplasma in general. Spiroplasmas contain long flexible fibrils composed of a single protein of molecular weight 55,000 (166). This fibril proteiriis a Sp iroplasma-specific antigen (165). It has been detected in all spiroplasmas tested, including the poorly helical ASP-l strain, but has not been found in several Mycoplasma spp. and Acholeplasma spp. that were examined. Hence, a technique was developed (164) with which the fibril antigen can be detected in diseased plants. This technique involves gel electrophoresis of detergent-solubilized plant material, blot transfer of the separated proteins to nitrocellulose filters, and, finally, serological detection of the antigens. The sensitivity of the technique is comparable to that of ELISA. By this method the fibril antigen has been detected in S. citri- and CSS-infected periwinkles but not in periwinkles infected with MLOs of clover phyllody, clover disease, cabbage disease, European aster yellows, primula disease, hydrangea disease, or apple disease. The test was also negative with the cactus Op untia tuna monstrosa.

by UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - Smathers Library on 11/04/09. For personal use only. The number of MLOs per gram of tissue (1010) was well within the detection Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1984.22:361-396. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org limits of the method. In conclusion, none of the MLOs tested in the above studies showed any relationship to Sp iroplasma or Acholeplasma. Among these MLOs were those associated with O. tuna monstrosa, aster yellows, and decline-affected pear trees. It is therefore surprising that other workers have been able to culture S. citri from plants infected with precisely these three MLOs. One reason for these contradictory results might be the fact that some plant infections are caused by a combination of an MLO and S. citri. 382 BOYE

DOUBLE INFECTIONS OF PLANTS WITH AN MLO AND S. CITRI

Oldfield (127) was the first to report the occurrence of double infections of S. citri and MLO in brassicaceous plants and periwinkles in California. He showed that the leafhopper N. tenellus, an active vector of S. citri, can also transmit a virescence MLO. In fact, field-collected N. tenellus leafhoppers, when caged with periwinkles, transmitted the following agents:

1. S. citri alone. In this case, the infected plants showed severe chlorosis, S. citri could be cultured from them, and they died within 3-5 months. 2. A virescence MLO alone. In this case, the infected plants showed viresc­ ence symptoms, S. citri could not be isolated, and electron microscopy detected only MLOs in the sieve tubes. The plants lived. 3. S. citri plus a virescence MLO. In this case, the plants showed virescence symptoms but no severe chlorosis, S. citri could be isolated, and the plants lived. Furthermore, the leafhopper Scaphytopius nitridus selectively trans­ mitted S. citri from the doubly infected donor periwinkles to healthy periwinkles. The latter developed severe chlorosis but no virescence and died prematurely, in contrast to the donor periwinkles, which lived.

Further confirmation of the occurrence of double infections comes from the work of Kloepper & Garrot (78) in California. These workers have isolated S. citri from peach and cherry trees affected by typical symptoms of X-disease. However, the number of trees from which S. citri could be isolated was very small: 6 out of 111 peach treestested and 16 out of 459 cherry trees examined. The trees from which no S. citri culture was obtained contained only non­ helical MLOs in their sieve tubes, while 4 cherry trees from which S. citri was isolated contained both MLOs and filamentous forms that resembled spiroplas­ mas. These results were confirmed and extended in later experiments (79). S. citri was isolated from only a small percentage of X- diseased cherry samples, and the spiroplasma was also found present in symptomless trees. These results support the conclusion that the etiological agent of X -disease is not S. citri and

by UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - Smathers Library on 11/04/09. For personal use only. that spiroplasmas are distinct fromthe MLOs. The association of S. citri with Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1984.22:361-396. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org X-diseased trees is probably a chance coinfection with S. citri thatalso occurs in symptomless trees and does not contribute to the symptoms of X-disease (79). A spiroplasma serologically indistinguishable from S. citri has been cultured from pear trees showing pear decline (133). While these data were first interpreted to mean that S. citri was the causal agent of pear decline, in later experiments S. citri was isolated in only 4 of 330 isolation attempts. On the basis of this result and others, it was eventually concluded that the isolated spiroplasma was not the causal agent of pear decline and that S. citri may occur as part of a mixed infection with the pear decline agent in the same plants (137). S. citri has been isolated from lettuce with aster yellows (AY) symptoms (8 1, WALL-LESS PROKARYOTES 383

94, 100, 133) and has been implicitely considered the causal agent of aster yellows. Final success in cultivating the "aster yellows mycoplasmas" was attributed essentially to the choice of source material, diseased lettuce plants (98). Kloepper & Garrot (78) also tried to isolate S. citri from A V-affected plants. They were unable to culture S. citri from 14 AV-affected lettuce plants and 48 A Y-affected plantago plants; however, 4 out of 53 A Y-affected peri­ winkles yielded an S. citri culture. Plantago plants showing an atypical form of A Y were also tested for S. citri isolation; in this case, S. citri was consistently cultured, with an isolation frequency greater than 90%. Here again, mixed infections explain the results. The 14 lettuce plants, the 48 plantagos, and the 53 periwinkles showing typical AY (virescence) symptoms were all infected with the A Y MLO, but 4 of the periwinkles were doubly infected and carried S. citri in addition to the MLO, a situation very similar to the one that Oldfield observed in Southern California(see above). The plantago plants with atypical symptoms of A Y that consistently yielded S. citri were probably infected with S. citri alone. Hence, their symptoms were those of an S. citri infection and not those associated with the typical AY MLO. This conclusion is further sup­ ported by the fact that S. citri is serologically unrelated to the MLO found in AY-affected plants (158). Thus, it appears that the "Aster yellows spiroplasma" (98), S. citri, is irrelevant to aster yellows disease. The aster yellows controversy has been thoroughly discussed in two recent reviews (156, 179), and additional argu­ ments against a spiroplasmal etiology for A Y have been presented. Contamina­ tion in the laboratory or in the greenhouse from S. citri-infected leafhoppers must also be considered. In conclusion, active natural transmission of S. citri and MLOs by insect vectors results not only in plants infected with S. citri or MLOs alone, but also in double infections, where S. citri and MLOs are present in the same plant. Single and double infections can be effected experimentally in periwinkle by graft inoculations (150). In single infections, periwinkle plants show character­ istic symptoms when inoculated with phyllody-virescence, stolbur-flower dwarfing, or chloranty MLOs, for example. Infected with S. citri, they show

by UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - Smathers Library on 11/04/09. For personal use only. lethal wilting six weeks after inoculation and exposure to temperatures close to Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1984.22:361-396. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org 32°C, the temperatures at which S. citri grows best. In double infections, when S. citri and an MLO were inoculated at the same time, the periwinkles showed symptoms of MLO infection but no lethal wilting, even though they were kept at 32°C. S. citri was present in these plants; it could be cultured from them and was detected by ELISA. Similar results were obtained when the periwinkles were first infected with the MLO, and later with S. citri, at a time (four weeks post-inoculation) when MLO symptoms had already appeared. Plants that received S. citri first and an MLO four weeks thereafter developed lethal wilting, but after twelve weeks rather than six weeks in the absence of the MLO. 384 BOYE

There is good reason to think that the severity of symptoms shown by an S. citri-infected plant increases with the number of S. citri helices present in that plant. This number is influenced by temperature. In plants grown at 32°C, S. citri helices are much more numerous than in those exposed at lower tempera­ tures (84). In doubly infected periwinkles, where the presence of MLOs has prevented lethal wilting due to S. citri, electron microscopy is able to detect many plieomorphic MLOs but few S. citri helices in the sieve tubes, even though ELISA and/or culture has detected S. citri. In California, it has been found that field-infected broccoli plants contain a lower spiroplasma population in double infections than in single ones (80). It thus seems that MLO multi­ plication somehow interfers with the multiplication of S.citri. In this way, S. citri concentration is prevented from developing sufficiently to induce lethal Wilting. Some of theplants doubly infected with graft inoculation were indistinguish­ able from periwinkles naturally infected in Morocco, Turkey, and Syria (150). On the basis of their symptom expression, both the naturally and the ex­ perimentally infected periwinkles seemed to be infected by an MLO only, yet ELISA and/or culture could detect the presence of S. citri. The last example to be discussed concerns the ornamental cactus Opuntia tuna monstrosa from which S. citri has been cultured (26, 82). This spiroplas­ rna has been assumed to be the causal agent of the "monstrosa condition" of O. tuna, even though, as Christi!lnsen and co-workers pointed out (26), electron microscopy of O. tuna monstrosa material has never revealed the helical organisms. On the other hand, ELISA failed to detect S. citri in O. tuna monstrosa material (52) and we obtained the same result (C. Saillard, J. M. Bove, unpublished data). Furthermore, we were never able to culture S. citri from monstrosa cactus material (J. C. Vignault, J. M. Bove, unpublished data; 164). Finally, a virescence-inducing MLO was transmitted from O. tuna monstrosa to periwinkle by dodder (Cuscuta campestris) (c. Saillard, J. M. Bove, unpublished data), and S. citri could not be detected in the periwinkles by ELISA or culture. Therefore, the monstrosa cactus used in thisresearch was infected with a virescence-inducing MLO, but its infection with S. citri is very

by UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - Smathers Library on 11/04/09. For personal use only. doubtful. Furtherstudies aredefinitely required to elucidate the etiology of the Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1984.22:361-396. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org monstrosa condition of O. tuna. One prerequisite in these studies should be to use the same plant material. Some cactus might have a mixed infection (MLO + S. citri), others a single infection (MLO).

PURIFI CATION OF ML Os: AN APPROACH TO THEIR CHARACTERIZATION

So far, no MLOs have been cultured. As an alternative to their cultivation, several groups of workers have attempted their purification(4, 21,28, 86, 151, WALL-LESS PROKARYOTES 385

157, 158). Even though the partially purified MLO preparations have been used to study the ultrastructure of MLOs (152), their lipid composition (154), and their proteins (159), major efforts have been directed toward the production of antisera (21, 28, 155, 158). Immunosera were first used in double diffusion tests (155); more recently immunosorbent electron microscopy (IEM) (21, 158) and especially ELISA (28) have become the prderred techniques. This work takes advantage of previous experience in the use of ELISA to detect S. citri in plants and insects (29, 147-149) and in the use of plants infected with S. citri (4, 28) or the com stunt spiroplasma (55, 134) as models or positive control systems. MLO preparations from affected plants are, at the present stage, not yet free of contaminating host plant antigens; the antisera obtained from them often show high anti-plant activity. This activity can be reduced by extensively cross-absorbing the antisera with antigens from healthy plants (28). In addition, a new indirect ELISA test using immunoglobulin F (ab'h fragments in the coating step, whole antiserum as the second antibody, and immunoglobulin Fc fragments in the conjugate has been developed (6) and applied to the detection of MLO antigens (28). Considerable improvement in limiting background reactions due to anti-plant activity was achieved by diluting the already CroSS­ absorbed whole antiserum used as the second antibody in an extract of healthy plants (28). Another way of decreasing background reaction is to prepare the MLO antigens needed to raise the antiserum from a host other than those to be tested (28). One application of this approach is to use MLO-infected leafhop­ pers to prepare the antigens for immunizing and applying the antiserum to the detection of the MLO in plants. In this way, the agent ofJlavescence doree from infected Vicia Ja ba plants was seen with IEM using antibodies raised in the leafhopper Euscelidius variegatus (21). This elegant approach can now be applied to determining the serological relationships between various MLOs. This is an important problem, and the first results along these lines have already appeared. Antisera have been obtained from periwinkle plants infected with either S. citri or the clover phyllody MLO and used in the new indirect ELISA men­ tioned above (28). The antibodies were able to specifically detect their homolo­ gous antigens. The clover phyllody antiserum reacted to extracts of plants by UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - Smathers Library on 11/04/09. For personal use only. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1984.22:361-396. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org infected with the clover phyllody MLO whether the infected plant was peri­ winkle or clover, or whether the clover phyllody strain was from England or the Netherlands; it also reacted to strawberry plants affected by green petal disease. Interestingly, clover phyllody and strawberry green petal diseases have been reported to share a common etiology on the basis of transmission experiments; now, the first direct serological confirmation of this relationship has been obtained (28). Finally, the clover phyllody antiserum did not react with MLO from apple, cabbage, dahlia, gladiolus, hydrangea, or primula. Similar studies involving ELISA and IEM have been carried out with antisera against MLOs from aster (Callistephus chinensis) plants infected with the A Y MLO (158). 386 BOYE

Until now, attempts to characterize MLOs were essentially based on the reactions they induced in their plant or insect hosts. The above data clearly indicate the feasibility of investigating serological specificity and relationships among the MLOs themselves, without having to culture the organism in vitro (28). The production of an antiserum would not require live organisms, nor would highly purifiedMLO preparations be needed, if ways could be found to reduce background reactions, as indicated above. However, for certain studies, such as morphology and etiology examinations, it might be necessary to preserve the structure of the MLOs and to use live, unfixed organisms. With these objec­ tives in mind, a technique has been developed in which the sieve elements of periwinkle plants infected with S. citri, MLOs, or the bacterial clover c;lubleaf agent were separated from other cell types by partial digestion of the plant tissues with cellulase and macerozyme (86). The microorganisms present in the sieve elements from diseased plants could be seen clearly through the cell walls when viewed through dark field microscopy. In sieve elements from plants infected with pear decline, aster yellows, or tomato big bud agent, no helical microorganisms were seen, but pleiomorphic bodies of predominantly filamentous form were present. The sieve elements could be ruptured by osmotic shock, and this provided another way to studying MLO morphology further. All MLOs observed in this way had the same morphology. Similar results were obtained previously using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of MLOs after the fr eeze fracture of aster plants affected with either clover phyllody or aster yellows (72). Only a few MLOs have been examined with SEM, but the results obtained do not invalidate the conclusion drawn from traditional transmission electron microscopy: namely, that the MLOs associ­ ated with one disease are morphologically indistinguishable from those associ­ ated with another. While the partially purified MLO preparations have been mainly used to produce antisera for serological investigations of MLOs, they have not yet been employed to study biochemical or biophysical properties, probably because such studies require a purificationlevel higher than that for antisera production.

by UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - Smathers Library on 11/04/09. For personal use only. Efforts along these lines should prove fruitful, however. MLO DNA can be Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1984.22:361-396. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org extracted from purified MLO preparations and analyzed by techniques that have already been developed for genuine mycoplasmas. One of these tech­ niques is a restriction enzyme analysis of the DNA. This technique (14, 15) was originally developed to study MLO DNA, but it was never applied to MLO DNA because MLO purification techniques had not yet been able to produce MLO DNA pure enough to be analyzed. However, it has been found most useful for the characterization of Acholeplasma, Mycoplasma, and Sp iroplas­ rna species (15, 141). In another approach, the DNA from one MLO can be radioactively labeled by nick translation and used for DNA-DNA hybridization WALL-LESS PROKARYOTES 387

with unlabeled DNA from other MLOs. The determination of G + C content does not even require extraction of the DNA. The partially purified MLO preparation can be submitted directly to equilibrium centrifugation in cesium chloride; the G + C content can be calculated from the buoyant density of the DNA band. This technique has been used to determine the G + C content of the unculturable Drosophila spiroplasma (77). The techniques developed for one- or two-dimensional analyses of myco­ plasma proteins on polyacrylamide gels (36, 117, 119, 167) have not been sufficiently adapted to purified MLO preparations. With the very sensitive protein staining methods now available, only limited amounts of proteins are required. In this way, MLO-specific protein spots can be identified on the gels and used to prepare highly specific rabbit or guinea pig antisera. Such mono­ specific antibodies have been prepared against single S. citri proteins ( 117) and they stand as witnesses for the feasability of this approach. Monoclonal antibodies (MCAs) can also provide monospecific immuno­ globulins against individual proteins. MCAs have been prepared against S. citri (117), and both S. citri-specific and non-specific MCA secreting hybridoma clones have been obtained. All the specific MCAs were directed against one single S. citri protein: spiralin, the main membrane protein of S. citri. The nonspecific MCAs gave positive ELISA results not only with S. citri but also with spiroplasmas other than S. citri (117). Application of the hybridoma technique to MLOs seems highly promising in that only partially purified MLO preparations are required. In spite of much circumstantial evidence concerning their pathogenic role in yellows diseases, MLOs have not yet been strictly shown to be the causal agents of the diseases in which they are seen. Some of the techniques presented in this section might eventually lead to preparations of live MLOs pure enough not only for biochemical , biophysical, and serological characterizations, but for the fulfillment of Koch's postulates as well.

CONCLUSION

by UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - Smathers Library on 11/04/09. For personal use only. Three types of wall-less prokaryotes are associated with plants: the sieve-tube­ Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1984.22:361-396. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org specific, yellows disease-associated MLOs; the pathogenic spiroplasmas, also sieve-tube-specific; and the mollicutes (Spiroplasma, Acholeplasma, Myco­ plasma) found on the surfaces of plants and flowers. Among the agents associated with or responsible for diseases in plants, only the spiroplasmas have been cultured. The plant pathogenic spiroplasmas may not be limited to S. citri and CSS. Other spiroplasmas might yet be found to be plant pathogens; spiroplasma P4Q is one such candidate. MLOs have not yet been cultured and their true nature remains unknown. Techniques for their purification are being developed and progress has already been made toward understanding their 388 BOVE

serological character and relationships. More and more evidence accumulates to indicate that spiroplasmas, especially S. citri. do not derive from MLOs. Double infections of plants with both S. citri and an MLO are well documented and offer at least one explanation of why S. citri occasionally can be cultured from MLO-infected plants, such as periwinkles with aster yellows, pear trees with decline, and O. tuna with the monstrosa condition. The well-known presence of mollicutes on the surface of both healthy and diseased plants now makes understandable why mycoplasmas can occasionally be cultured from MLO-infected hosts. The isolation of S. citri and Acholeplas­ rna sp. from healthy and lethal yellowing-affected coco tissues is a good illustration of this point. The culturable spiroplasmas, especially S. citri, have lent themselves to numerous studies on their biological, biochemical, and immunological prop­ erties. The cloning of a spiroplasma plasmid and the expression of a spiroplas­ rna gene in E. coli open the way to sp�roplasma genetics based on recombinant DNA technology. Transfection of spiroplasmas with viral DNA shows that these organisms can be transformed and that viral DNA might become a vector for cloning in mollicutes. Host-parasite models using spiroplasma-insect systems, at the level of the whole organism or at the level of the cell, might throw light on mycoplasma pathogenicity, a still poorly understood phenom­ enon. Finally, the close interrelationship between the mycoplasmas and their plant and insect hosts makes the ecology of the wall-less prokaryotes of plants a fascinating subject.

Literature Cited

1. Alivizatos, A. S., Markham, P. G., van, S. M. Garnsey, L. W. Timmer, pp. Townsend, R. 1982. Spirophlsma viruses 103-8. Riverside, Calif. : IOCV, Dept. in plants. 4th Inti. Congr. Inti. Org . Plant Patho! ., Univ. Calif. Mycoplasmol. (10M). Tokyo. 1-7 6. Barbara, D. J., Clark, M. F. 1982. A September. Abstr. P-74. 124 pp. simple indirect ELISA using F (ab 'h 2. Alivazatos. A. S., Townsend. R., Mark­ fragments of immunoglobulin. 1. Gen. ham, P. G. 1982. Effects of i'nfection Viral. 58:315-22 with a spiroplasma virus on the symp­ 7. Barker, L. F. 1968. Determination of toms produced by Spiroplasma citri. antibiotic susceptibility of rickettsiae and by UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - Smathers Library on 11/04/09. For personal use only.

Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1984.22:361-396. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org Ann. Appl. Bioi. 101:85-91 chlamydiae in BSC-l cell structures. 3. Archer, D. B., Best, J., Barber, C. 1981. Antimicrob. Ag. Chemother. pp. 425-28 Isolation and re striction mapping of a 8. Bove, J. M. 1975. Les mycoplasmes. La spiroplasma plasmid. J. Gen. Microbiol. recherche. 6:210-20 126:511-14 9. Bove, J. M. 1981. Mycoplasma infec­ 4. Archer, D. B., Townsend, R., Mark­ tions of plants. Israel J. Med. Sci. ham, P. G. 1982. Detection of Spiroplas­ 17:572-85 rna citri in plants and insect hosts by 10. Bove, J. M. 1982. Les spiroplasmes, ELISA. Plant Pathol. 31:299--306 nouveaux mycoplasmes pathogenes des 5. Aubert, B., Bove, J. M. 1980. Effect of vegetaux et des animaux. In Les Mala­ penicillin or tetracycline injections of cit­ dies des Plantes (llIe joumees fran!raises rus trees affected by greening disease d'etudes d'informations). ACTA, 149 under field conditions in Reunion Island. rue de Bercy , 75595 Paris cedex 12. InProc. 8th Conj. IOCV, ed. E. C. Cala- Paris, Octobre 1979, pp. 379--427 WALL-LESS PROKARYOTES 389

11. Bove, J. M., Bonnet, P., Gamier, M., C., Larrue, J., Fleury, A., Boudon, E. Aubert, B. 1980. Penicillin and tetracy­ 1982. Purification serologique et cline treatments of greening disease­ observation ultra-microscopique de l'a­ affected citrus plants in the glasshouse, gent pathogene (MLO) de la flavescence and the bacterial nature of the procaryote don<:e de la vigne dans les extraits liquides associated with greening. See Ref. 5, pp. de !eves (Vicia !a ba L.) malades. C. R. 91-102 Seances Soc. Bioi. 176(5):723-29 12. Bove, J. M., Mouches, C., Carle-Junca, 22. Charron, A., Bebear, c., Brun, G., Yot, P., Degorce-Dumas, J. R., Tully, J. G., P., Latrille, J., Bove, J. M. 1979. Whitcomb, R. F. 1984. Spiroplasmas of Separation and partial characterization of group I: the Sp iroplasma cirri cluster. two deoxyribonucleic acid polymerases Yale J. Bioi. Med. In press from Spiroplasma citri. J. Bacteriol. 13. Bove, J. M., Moutous, G., Saillard, C., 140(3):763-68 Fos, A., Bonfils, J., Vignault, J. e., 23. Charron, A., Castroviejo, M., Bebear, Nhami, A., Abassi, M., Kabbage, K., e., Latrille, I., Bove, I. M. 1982. A third Hafidi , B., Mouches, C., Viennot­ DNA polymerase from Sp iropiasma citri Bourgin, G. 1979. Mise en evidence de and two other spiroplasmas. J. Bacteriol. Sp iroplasma citri, 1 'agent causal de la 149(3): 1138-4 1 maladie du "stubborn" des agrumes dans 24. Chen, T. A., Davis, R. E. 1979. Cultiva­ 7 cicadelles du Maroc. C. R. Acad. Sci. tion of spiroplasmas. See Ref. 14, pp. Paris, ser. D. 288:335-38 65-82 14. Bove. J. M., Saillard, C. 1979. Cell biol­ 25. Chen, T. A., Liao, C. H. 1975. Com ogy of spiroplasmas. In The Mycoplas­ stunt spiroplasma: Isolation, cultivation mas: 1I1 . Plant and Insect Mycoplasmas. and proof of pathogenicity. Science ed. R. F. Whitcomb, J. G. Tully, pp. 188:1015-17 83-153. New York: Academic 26. Christiansen, C., Freundt, E. A., Mara­ 15. Bove, J. M., Saillard, C., Junca, P. , De­ morosch, K. 1980. Identity of cactus and gorce-Dumas, J. R., Ricard, B., Nhami, lettuce spiroplasmas with Spiroplasma A., Whitcomb, R. F., Williamson, D., cirri as determined by DNA-DNA hy­ Tully, J. G. 1982. Guanine-plus-cytosine bridization. Curro Microbiol. 4:353- content, hybridization percentages, and 56 BeoRI restriction enzyme profiles of spi­ 27. Clark, H. F., Rorke, L. B. 1979. Spiro­ roplasmal DNA. Rev. In/. Dis. 4:SI29- plasmas of tick origin and their 36 pathogenicity. See Ref. 14, pp. 155-74 16. Bove, J. M., Saillard, e., Vignault, J. 28. Clark, M. F., Barbara, D. J., Davies, D. C., Fos, A. 1984. Citrus stubborndisease L. 1983. Production and characteristics in Irak and Syria: Correlation between of antisera to Sp iroplasma citri and clo­ symptom expression and detection of ver phyllody-associated antigens derived Sp iroplasma citri by culture and ELISA. from plants. Ann. Appl. Bioi. 103:251- Proc. 9th Conf. IOCV, Argentina. River­ 59 side, Calif. : IOCV, Dept. Plant Pathol., 29. Clark, M. F. , FJegg, C. L., Bar-Joseph, Univ. Calif. In press M., Rottem, S. 1978. The detection of 17. Bove, J. M., Whitcomb, R. F., McCoy, Sp iroplasma citri by enzyme-linked im­ R. E. 1983. Culture techniques for spiro­ munosorbent assay (ELISA). Phyto­ plasmas from plants. See Ref. 171, pp. pathol. 92:332-37 225-34 30. Clark, T. B. 1977. Spiroplasma sp.: A 18. Brinton, L. P., Burgdorfer, W. 1976. new pathogen in honey bees. J. Inver­ Cellular and subcellular organization of febr. Palhol. 29: 112-13 the 277F agent, a spiroplasma from rabbit 31. Clark, T. B, 1982. Spiroplasmas: Di­ by UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - Smathers Library on 11/04/09. For personal use only.

Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1984.22:361-396. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org tick (Haemaphysalis leporispalutris versity of arthropod reservoirs and host­ (A cari: ixodidael)}. Inti. J. Syst. Bacter­ parasite relationships. Science 217:57- iol. 26:554-60 59 19. Calavan, E. C., Ka1oostian, G. H., Old­ 32. Cole, R. M. 1979. Mycoplasma and spir­ field, G. N., Nauer, E. M., Gumpf, D. J. oplasma viruses: Ultrastructure . In The 1977. Natural spread ofSp iroplasma citri Mycop lasmas: I. Cell Biology, ed. M. F. by insect vectors and its implications for Barile, S._ Razin, pp. 385-410. New control of stubborn disease of citrus. York: Academic Proc. 1m. Soc. Citriculture, 3:900---2 33. Cole, R. M., Mitchell, W. O., Garon, C. 20. Calavan, E. C., Oldfield, G. N. 1979. F. 1977. Sp iroplasmavirus citri 3: Propa­ Symptomatology of spiroplasmal plant gation, purification, proteins and nucleic diseases. See Ref. 14, pp. 37-64 acid. Science. 198:1262-63 21. Caudwell, A. , Meignoz, R., Kuszala, 34. Cole, R. M., Tully, J. G., Popkin, T. J., 390 HOVE

Bove, J. M. 1973. Morphology, ultra­ plasmaIike organisms. and vascular­ structure and bacteriophage infection of limited fastidious walled bacteria. In the helical mycoplasma-like organism Phytopathogenic Prokaryotes, ed. M. (Spiroplasma citri gen. nov., sp. nov.) Mount, G. Lacy, 1:491-513. New York: cultured from "stubborn" disease of cit­ Academic rus. J. Bacteriol. 115(1):367-86 48. DaviS, R. E., Lee, L M .• Basciano, L. K. 35. Daniels. M. J. 1983. Mechanisms of 1979. Spiroplasmas: Serological group­ spiroplasma pathogenicity. Ann. Rev. ing of strains associated with plants and Phytopathol. 21:29-43 insects . Can. J. Microbial. 25:861-6 36. Daniels. M. J., Archer, D. B., Stephens. 49. Davis, R. E., Lee, I. M., Worley, J. F. M. A., Townsend, R., Longland. J. M., 1981. Spiropiasma jloricoia, a new spe­ Best, J. 1980. Comparison of spiroplas­ cies isolated from surfaces of flowers of mas by polyacrylamide gel elec­ the tulip tree Liriodendron tulipifera L. trophoresis of cell proteins. Curro Micro­ Int. J. Syst. Bact. 31(4):456-64 bioi. 4:377-80 50. Davis, R. E., Whitcomb, R. F. 1971. 37. Daniels, M. J., Markham, P. G., eds. Mycoplasmas, rickettsiae, and chlamy­ 1982. Plant and Insect Mycoplasma diae: Possible relation to yellows diseases Te chniques. London: Croom Helm 369 and other disorders of plants and insects. pp. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 9: 119-44 38. Das, J., ManiIoff, 1. 1976. Replication of 51. Davis, R. E., Worley, 1. F. , Whitcomb, mycoplasmavirus MVL5 1. IV. Inhibi­ R. F., Ishijima, T., Steere, R. L. 1972. tion of viral synthesis by rifampin. J. Helical filaments produced by a myco­ Virol. 18(3):969-76 plasma-like organism associated with 39. Davis, R. E. 1977. Cell wall-free pro­ corn stunt disease. Science 176:521- karyotes harbored in flowers. Proc. 3rd 3 Meet. Int. Counc. Lethal Yellowing . 52. De Leeuw, G. T. N., Polak-Vogelzang , Palm Beach County. Florida, Oct.-Nov. A. A., Hagenaars, A. M. 1983. Absence 1977. (Abstr.) of serological relationship between 40. Davis, R. E. 1978. Spiroplasma associ­ several mycoplasma-like organisni ated with flowers of the tulip tree . "strains", Sp iroplasma citri. com stunt (Liriodendron tulipifera). Can. J. Micro­ spiroplasma and Acholeplasma laidlawii. bioi. 24:954-59 determined by the enzyme-linked im­ 41. Davis, R. E. 1978. Spiroplasmas from munosorbent assay (ELISA). Phytapath. flowers of Bidens pilosa L. and honey Z. 107:31-36 bees in Florida: Relationship to honey 53. Doi, Y .• Teranaka, M., Yora, K., bee spiroplasma AS576 from Maryland. Asuyana, H. 1967. Mycoplasma or Phytopathol. News. 12(7):PO-7 (Abstr.) P.L.T. group-like microorganisms found 42. Davis, R. E. 1978. Spiroplasmas: Helical in the phloem elements of plants infected cell wall-freeprokaryotes in diverse habi­ with mulberry dwarf potato witches' tats. Proc. ROC US Coop . Sci. Sem. broom, aster yellows or paxlownia witch­ Mycoplasma Diseases of Plants. NSC es' broom. Ann. Phytopathol. Soc. Jp n. Symposium Series 1, pp. 59-64 33:259-66 43 . Davis, R. E. 1979. Spiroplasmas: Newly 54. Donachie, W. D., Begg, K. 1. 1970. recognized arthropod-borne pathogens. Growth of the bacterial cell. Nature In Leafhopper Vectors aiuI PlantDisease 227:1220-24 Agents. ed. K. Maramorosch. K. F. Har­ 55. Eden-Green, S. 1. 1982. Detection of ris, pp. 451-84. New York: Academic com stunt spiroplasma in vivo by ELISA 44. Davis, R. E. 1981. The enigma of the using antisera to extracts from infected

by UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - Smathers Library on 11/04/09. For personal use only. flower spiroplasmas. In · Mycop lasma corn plants (Zea mays). Plant Pathol. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1984.22:361-396. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org Diseases of Trees and Shrubs. ed. K. 31:289-97 Maramorosch, S. P. Raychaudhuri, pp. 56. Eden-Green, S. J., Archer, D. B., Tully, 259-79. New York: Academic ' 1. G .• Waters, H. 1983. Further studies 45. Davis, R. E. , Fletcher, J. 1983. Spiro­ on a spiroplasma isolated from coconut plasma citri in Maryland: Isolation from palms in Jamaica. Ann. Appl. Bioi. field-grown plants of horseradish 102:127-34 (Armoracia rusticana) with brittle root 57. Eden-Green, S. J., Tully, J. G. 1979. symptoms. Plant Dis. 67:900-3 Isolation of Achaleplasma spp from 46. Davis. R. E .• Lee. L M. 1982. Compara­ coconut palms affected by lethal yellow­ tive properties of spiroplasmas and ing disease in Jamaica. Curro Microbial. emerging taxonomic concepts: A propos­ 2:311 al. Rev. Inf. Dis. 4:S122-28 58. Eden-Green, S. J., Waters, H. 1981. 47. Davis, R. E., Lee, I. M. 1982. Isolation and preliminary characteriza­ Pathogenicity of spiroplasmas, myco- tion of a spiroplasma from coconut palms WALL-LESS PROKARYOTES 391

in Jamaica. J. Gen. Microbiol. 124:263- malike organisms after freeze fracture of 70 plant tissues affected with clover phyl­ 59. Edward, D. G., Freundt, E. A. 1967. lody and aster yellows. Phytopathol. Proposal for Mollicutes as name of the 68:677-80 class established for the order Mycoplas­ 73. Hopkins, D. L. 1977. Diseases caused by matales. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 17:267-8 leafhopper-borne, rickettsia-like bacteri­ 60. Fletcher, 1. , Schultz, G. A., Davis, R. a. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 15 :277-94 E., Eastman, C. E., Goodman, R. M. 74. Hopkins, D. L. 1983. Gram-negative, 1981. Brittle root disease of horseradish: xylem-limited bacteria in plant disease. Evidence for an etiological role of Sp iro­ Phytopathol. 73:347-50 plasl1Ul citri. Phytopathol. 71:1073- 75. Hurst, E. W. 1962. Experimental che­ 80 motherapy of infection with agents of the 61. Frazier, N. W. 1953. A survey of the psittacosis-lymphogranuloma-trachoma mediterraneanregion of the beet leafhop­ group. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 98:275- per. J. Econ. Entomol. 46:551-55 78 62. Freitag, J. G., Frazier, N. W., Huffaker, 76. Ishiie, T., Doi, Y., Yora, K., Asuyama, C. B. 1955. Cross breeding beet leafhop­ H. 1967. Suppressive effects of antibiot­ pers from California and French Moroc­ ics of tetracycline group on symptom de­ co. J. Econ . Entomol. 48:341-42 velopment of mulberry dwarf disease. 63. Fudl-Allah, A. F.-S. A., Calavan, E. C., Ann. Phytopathol. Soc. Japan. 33:267- Igwegbe, E. C. K. 1972. Culture of a 75 (In Japanese) mycoplasma-like organism associated 77. Junca, P., Saillard, C, Tully, J. G., Gar­ with stubborn disease of citrus. Phyto­ cia-Jurado, 0., Degorce-Dumas, J. R., pathol. 62:729-31 Mouches, C., Vignault, 1. C, Vogel, R. , 64. Gadeau, A., Mouches, C., Bove, J. M. McCoy, R., Whitcomb, R., Williamson, 1982. Resistance of mollicutes to rifam­ D., Latrille, J., Bove, J. M. 1980. Carac­ picine. See Ref. 1, Abst. P- 127. 177 pp. terisation de spiroplasmes isoles d'in­ 65. Garnier, M., Bove, J. M. 1983. Trans­ sectes et de fleurs de France Continen­ mission of the organism associated with tale, de Corse et du Maroc . Proposition citrus greening disease from sweet pour une classification des spiroplasmes. orange to periwinkle (Vinca rosea) by C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris. 290: 1209-12 dodder (Cuscuta campestris) . Phyto­ 78. Kloepper, J. W., Garrot, D. G. 1980. pathol. 73: 1 358-63 Relation of in vivo morphology to isola­ 66. Garnier, M., Clerc, M., Bove, J. M. tion of plant spiroplasmas. Curro Micro­ 1981. Growth and division of spiroplas­ bioi. , 4:365-70 mas: Morphology of S. citri during 79. Kloepper, J. W., Garrott, D. G. 1983. growth cycle in liquid medium. J. Bac­ Evidence for a mixed infection of spiro­ teriol. 147(2):642-52 plasmas and nonhelical mycoplasmalike 67. Garnier, M., Clerc, M., Bove, J. M. organisms in cherry with X-disease. Phy­ 1984. Growth and division ofSpirop las­ topathol. 73:357-60 ma citri: Elongation of elementary 80. Kloepper, J. W., Garrott, D. G., Old­ helices. J. Bacteriol. 158:23-28 field, G. N. 1982. Quantificationof plant 68. Gamier, M., Danel, N., Bove, J. M. pathogenic spiroplasmas from infected 1984. Etiology of citrus greening dis­ plants. Phytopathol. 72:577-8 1 ease. Ann. Microbiol. (Inst. Pasteur) 81. Kondo, F., Maramorosch, K., McIn­ 135A: 169-79 tosch, A. H., Varney, E. H. 1977. Aster 69. Giannotti , J. 1974. Cultures de molli­ yellows spiroplasmas: Isolation and cul­ cutes 11 partir de plantes atteintes de tivation in vitro . Proc. Am. Phytopathol. jaunisse et d'insectes vecteurs . Colloq. Soc. 4:190 by UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - Smathers Library on 11/04/09. For personal use only.

Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1984.22:361-396. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org Inst. Natl. Sante Med. Les mycoplasmesl 82. Kondo, F., McIntosh, A. H., Padhi, S. mycoplasmas 33:99-106 B., Maramorosch, K. 1976. A spiroplas­ 70. Gumpf, D. J., Calavan, E. C. 1981. rna isolated from the ornamental cactus Stubborn disease of citrus. See Ref. 44, Opuntia tuna monstrosa. Proc. Soc. pp. 97-134 Gen. Microbiol. 3:154 71. Hafidi, B., Bencheqroun, N., Fisher, H. 83. Lafleche, D., Bove, J. M. 1970. Struc­ J., Van der Veken, J. 1979. Application tures de type mycoplasme dans les de la technique immunoenzymatique feuilles d'orangers atteints de la maladie "ELISA" pour la detection de Sp iroplas­ du greening. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris. I1Ul citri, agent de la maladie du stubborn 270: 1915-17 des agrumes dans les orangeraies maro­ 84. Lafleche, D., Bove, J. M. 1970. Myco­ caines. Parasitica 35: 141-5 1 plasmes dans les agrumes atteints de 72. Haggis, G. H., Sinha, R. C. 1968. Scan­ greening, de stubborn ou de maladies ning electron microscopy of mycoplas- similaires. Fruits 25:455-65 392 BOVE

85. Lee, I. M., Davis, R. E. 1980. DNA 100. Maramorosch, K., Kondo, F. 1978. As­ homology among diverse spiropiasma ter yellows spiroplasma: Infectivity and strains representing several serological association with a rod-shaped virus: Zbl. groups. Can. 1. Microbiol. 26: 1356--63 Bakt. Hyg., I. Abt. Orig. A241:196 86. Lee, I. M., Davis, R. E. 1983. Phloem­ (Abstr.) limited prokaryotes in sieve elements iso­ 101. Markham, P. 1982. The "yellows" plant lated by enzyme treatment of diseased diseases: Plant hosts and their interaction plant tissues. Phytopathol. 73:1 540-43 with the pathogens. See Ref. 37, pp. 82- 87 . Lei, J. D., Su, H. J., Chen, T. A. 1979. 100 Spiroplasmas isolated from green leaf 102. Markham, P. G., Townsend, R., Plas­ bug Trigonotylus ruficornis Geoffroy. kilt, K., Saglio, P. 1977. Transmission See Ref. 42, pp. 89-98 of corn stunt to dicotyledonous plants. 88. Liao, C. H., Chen, T. A. 1982. Media Plant Dis. Rep. 61:342-45 and methods for culture of spiroplasmas. 103. McCoy, R. E. 1979. Mycoplasmas and See Ref. 37, pp. 175-200 yellows diseases. See Ref. 14, pp. 229- 89. Liss, A., Cole, R. M. 1981. Spiroplas­ 64 mavirus group I: Isolation, growth, and 104. McCoy, R. E., Basham, H. G. 1982. properties. Curro Microbial. 5:357-62 Lack of serological relationship between 90. Liss, A., Cole, R. M. 1982. Spiroplas­ the aster yellows agent and Spiroplasma mal viruses: Group I characteristics. Rev. citri determined by ELISA assay. See InJ. Dis . 4:S115-9 Ref. 1, Abst. P-70. 120 pp. 91. Liu, H. Y., Gumpf, D. J., Oldfield, G. 105. McCoy, R. E., Basham, G. H., Tully, J. N., Calavan, E. C. 1983. Transmission G., Rose, D. 1982. Isolation of a new of Spiroplasma citri by Circulifer tenel­ Acholeplasma from flowers in Florida. Ius. Phytopathol. 73:582-85 Rev. lnf. Dis. 4:5274 92. Liu, H. Y., Gympf, D. J., Oldfield, G. 106. McCoy, R. E., Mi11er, M. E., Williams, N., Calavan, E. C. 1983. The rela­ D. S. 1980. Lethal yellowing in Texas tionship of Spiroplasma citri and Circu­ phoenix palms. Principes 24(4): 179-80 lifertenellus. Phytopathol. 73:585-90 107. McCoy , R. E., Tsai, J. H., Norris, R. C. 93. Lovisolo, 0., Lisa, V., D'Agostino, G., 1983. Pigeon pea witches' broom in Flor­ Loche, P., Fresu , B. 1982. Grave malat­ ida. Plant Dis 67:443-45 tia del pomodoro associata a micoplasmi, 108. McCoy, R. E., Williams, D. S. 1982. in Sardegna. In Aui Giornate Fitopatho­ Chemical treatment for control of plant logiche-5upplemento, pp. 35-41. Bo­ mycoplasma diseases. See Ref. 37, pp. logna: Coop. Lib. Univ. Edit. 152-73 94. Lowe, S. K., Raju, B. C. 1978. The 109. McCoy, R. E., Williams, D. S., Tho­ morphology of spiroplasmas associated mas, D. L. 1978. Isolation of mycoplas­ with aster yellows and pear decline dis­ mas from flowers. See Ref. 42, pp. 75- ease: A comparative study by negative 81 staining in vitro . Phytopathol. News. 110. Mouches, c., Barroso, G., Bove, J. M. 12:216 1983. Characterization and molecular 95. Maniloff, J. 1983. Evolution of wall-less cloning in Escherichia coli of a plasmid prokaryotes. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 37: from the mollicute Sp iroplasma citri. 1. 477-99 Bacteriol. 156(2):952-55 96. Maramorosch, K. 1976. Plant mycoplas­ 111. Mouches, c., Barroso, G., Gadeau, A., ma diseases. In Encyclopedia of Plant Bove, J. M. 1984. Plasmids and recom­ Physiology. New Series. Vol. 4. Phys­ binant DNA from Spirop/asma citri and iological Plant Pathology, ed. R. Heite­ other spiroplasmas. See Ref. 16 112. Mouches, Barroso, G. , Gadeau, A., by UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - Smathers Library on 11/04/09. For personal use only. fuss, P. H. Williams, pp. 150-7 1. New c.,

Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1984.22:361-396. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org York: Springer-Verlag Bove, J. M. 1984. Characterization of 97. Maramorosch, K. 1980. Spiroplasmas of two cryptic plasmids from Spiroplasma plants and animals: An overview. India: citri and occurrence of their DNA se­ Nat. Acad. Sci. Gold Jub. Comm. Vol. quences among various spiroplasmas. 20 pp. Ann. Microbiol. (lnst. Pasteur) 98. Maramorosch, K. 1981. Spiroplasmas: 135A: 17-24 Agents of animal and plant diseases. 113. Mouches, C., Bove, J. M. 1984. Aplas­ Bioscience 31(5):374-80 mid from S. citri strain M4 hybridizes 99. Maramorosch, K. 1982. Control of vec­ with extrachromosomal DNAs from tor-borne mycoplasmas. In Pathogens, other spiroplasmas, including corn stunt Vectors and Plant Diseases, ed. K. Har­ spiroplasma E275, tick spiroplasma 277F ris, K. Maramorosch, pp. 265-95. New and coco spiroplasma N525. Yale J. Bioi. York: Academic Med. In prcss WALL-LESS PROKARYOTES 393

114. Mouches, c., Bove, J. M., Albisetti, J. like organisms as plant pathogens. Ann. 1984. Pathogenicity of Spiroplasma apis Rev. Phytopathol. 17:37-58 and other spiroplasmas for honey bees in 126. O'Hayer, K. W., Schultz, G. A., East­ southwestern France. Ann. Microbial. man, C. E., Fletcher, J., Goodman, R. (lnst. Pasteur) 135A: 151-55 M. 1982. Transmission of Sp iroplasma 115. Mouches, c., Bove, J. M., Albisetti, J., citri by the aster leafhopper Macrosteles Clark, T. B., Tully, J. G. 1982. A spiro­ fa scifrons (Homoptera: cicadellidae). plasma of serogroup IV causes a May­ Ann. Appl. Bioi. 102:311-18 disease like disorder of honeybees in 127. Oldfield, G. N. 1982. A virescence agent southwestern France. Microb. Eco!. 8: transmitted by Circulifer tenetlus 387-99 (Baker); aspects of its plant host range 116. Mouches, C., Bove, J. M., Tully, J. G., and association with Sp iroplasma citri. Rose, D. L. , McCoy, R. E., Carle­ Rev. Inf. Dis. 4:S248 Junca, P., Garnier, M., Saillard, C. 128. Oldfield, G. N., Calavan, E. C. 1981. 1983. Sp iroplasma apis, a new species Sp iroplasma citri: Non rutaceous hosts. from the honey-bee Apis mellifera. Ann. In Description and Illustration of Virus Microbial. (Inst. Pasteur) 134A:383- and Virus-Like Diseases of Citrus: A Col­ 97 lection of Color Slides Vo l. IV. ed. J. 117. Mouches, C., Candresse, T., McGarrity, Bove, R. Vogel. Paris: IRFA, 6 rue G. J., Bove, J. M. 1984. Analysis of Gem!ral Clergerie, 75 116 Paris, France spiroplasma proteins: Contribution to the 129. Oldfield, G. N., Kaloostian, G. H. 1978. taxonomy of group IV spiroplasmas and Vectors and host range of the citrus stub­ the characterization of spiroplasma pro­ born disease pathogen, Sp iroplasma cit­ tein antigens. Yale J. Bioi. Med. In press rio See Ref. 42, pp. 119-25 118. Mouches, c., Duthil, P., Vignault, J. c., 130. Pickens, E. G., Gerloff, R. F., Burgdor­ Protopapadakis, F., Nhami, A., Tully, J. fer, W. 1968. Spirochetes on the rabbit G., Bove, J. M. 1980. Characterization tick Haemaphysalis leporispalustris of spiroplasmas by polyacrylamide gel (Packard) . I: Isolation and preliminary analysis of their proteins and enzymes. characterization. J. Bacterial. 95:291-99 See Ref. 5, pp. 134-44 131. Purcell, A. H. 1982. Insect vector rela­ 119. Mouches, C., Menara, A., Tully, J. G., tionships with procaryotic plant path­ Bove, J. M. 1982. Polyacrylamide gel ogens. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 20:397- analysis of spiroplasmal proteins and its 417 contribution to the taxonomy of spiro­ 132. Quinlan, D. C., Maniloff, J. 1972. Mem­ plasmas. Rev. Inf. Dis. 4:S141-47 brane association of the deoxyribonucleic 120. Mouches, C., Vignault, J. C., Tully, J. acid growing point region in Mycoplasma G., Whitcomb, R. F. , Bove, J. M. 1979. gallisepticum. J. Bacterial. 112: 1375 Characterization of spiroplasmas by onc­ 133. Raju, B. c., Nyland, G. 1978. Effects of and two-dimensional protein analysis on different media on the growth and mor­ polyacrylamide slab gel. Curro Micro­ phology of three newly isolated plant bial. 2:69-74 spiroplasmas. Phytopathol. News . 12: 121. Nasu, S., Sugiura, M., Wakimoto, T., 216 (Abstr. 418) Iida, T. T. 1967. On the etiologic agent 134. Raju, B. C., Nyland, G. 1981. Enzymc­ of rice yellow dwarf disease. Ann. Phyto­ linked immunosorbent assay for the de­ pathol. Soc. Japan. 33:343-44. In tection of corn stunt spiroplasma in plant Japanese and insect tissues. Current Microbial. 122. Nault, L. 1980. Maize bushy stunt and 5:101-4 corn stunt: A comparison of disease 135. Raju, B. c., Nyland, G., Backus, E. A., symptoms, pathogen host ranges and McLean, D. L. 1981. Association of a by UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - Smathers Library on 11/04/09. For personal use only.

Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1984.22:361-396. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org vectors . Am. Phytopathol. Soc. 70(7): spiroplasma with brittle root of horserad­ 659-62 ish. Phytopathol. 71(10): 1067-72 123. Nhami, A., Bove, J. M., Bove, C.,Mon­ 136. Raju, B. C., Nyland, G., Meikle, T., sion, M., Garnier, M. Saillard, C., Purcell, A. H. 1981. Helical, motile Moutous, G., Fos, A. 1980. Natural mycoplasmas associated with flowers transmission of Sp iroplasma citri to peri­ and honey bees in California. Can. J. winkles in Morocco. See Ref. 5, pp. Microbiol. 27(2):249-53 153-6 1 137. Raju, B. C., Nyland, G., Purcell, A. H. 124. Nienhaus, F. 1979. Li4'�hen-Degenera­ 1983. Current status of the etiology of tion durch Rickettsien-Ahnliche Bakte­ pear decline. Phytopathol. 73:350-53 rien. Allgemeine Forstzeitschrift , 6 138. Ranhand, J. M., Mitchell, W. O., Pop­ 125. Nienhaus, F. , Sikora, R. A. 1979. Myco­ kin, T. J .. Cole. R. M. 1980. Covalently plasmas, spiroplasmas, and rickettsia- closed circular deoxyribonucleic acids in 394 BOVE

spiroplasmas. J. Bacteriol. 143:1 194- of ELISA to the detection of Spiroplasma 9 citri in plants and insects. See Ref. 5, pp. 139. Razin, S., Glaser, G., Amikam, D. 145-52 1984. Molecular and biological features ISO. Saillard, C., Vignault, J. c., Fos, A., of mollicutes (Mycoplasmas). Ann. Mi­ Bove, J. M. 1984. Spiroplasma citri crobiol. (lnst. Pasteur) . 135A9-15 induced lethal wilting of periwinkles is 140. Razin, S., Tully, J. G., eds. 1983. prevented by prior or simultaneous in­ Methods in Mycoplasmology, Mycoplas­ fection of the periwinkle by an MLO. ma Characterization. Vol. I. New York: Ann. Microbiol. (Inst. Pasteur) . 135A: Academic. 504 pp. 163-68 141. Razin, S., Tully, J. G., Rose, D. L., 151. Sinha, R. C. 1974. Purification of myco­ Barile, M. F. 1983. DNA cleavage pat­ plasma-like organisms from China aster terns as indicators of genotypic heter­ plants affected with clover phyllody. ogeneity among strains of Acholeplasma Phytopathol. 64(8): 1156-58 and Mycoplasma species. J. Gen. Micro­ 152. Sinha, R. C. 1976. Ultrastructure of bioi. 129: 1935-44 mycoplasma-like organisms purified 142. Saglio, P., Lafleche , D., Bonissol, C., from clover phyllody-affected plants. J. Bove, J. M. 1971. Culture in vitro des Ultrastr. Res. 54: 183-89 mycoplasmes associes au stubborn des 153. Sinha, R. C. 1979. Chemotherapy of agrumes et leur observation au micro­ mycoplasmal plant diseases. See Ref. 14, scope eiectronique. C. R. Acad. Sci. pp. 309-35 272: 1387-90 154. Sinha, R. C. 1979. Lipid composition of 143. SagJio, P., Lafleche , D., Bonissol, C., mycoplasma-like organisms purified Bove , J. M. 1971. Isolement, culture et from clover phyllody and aster yellows­ observation au microscope electronique affected plants. Phytopathol. Z. 96: 132- des structures de type mycoplasme as so­ 39 ciees a la maladie du stubborn des 155. Sinha, R. C. 1979. Purification and agrumes et leur comparaison avec les serology of mycoplasma-like organisms structures observees dans Ie cas de la from aster yellow-infected plants. Can . maladie du greening des agrumes. Phys­ J. Plant Pathot. 1:65-120 iol. VCg . 9:569-82 156. Sinha, R. C. 1984. The aster yellows 144. Saglio, P. , Lafleche, D., L'Hospital, controversy: Current status. Yale J. Bioi. M., Dupont, G., Bove, J. M. 1972. Med. In press Isolation and growth of citrus mycoplas­ 157. Sinha, R. C. 1983. Physical techniques mas . In Pathogenic Mycoplasmas: A for purification of mycoplasmas from ClBA Foundation Symposium, pp. 187- plant tissues. See Ref. 17, pp. 243- 203. Amsterdam: Elsevier-Excerpta 47 Medica 158. Sinha, R. C., Benhamou, N. 1983. De­ 145. Saglio, P., L'Hospital, M., Lafleche , tection of mycoplasma-like organism­ D., Dupont, G., Bove, J. M., Tully, J. antigens from aster yellows diseased G., Freundt, E. A. 1973. Sp iroplasma plants by two serological methods. Phy­ citri gen. and sp. n.: A mycoplasma-like topathol. 73:1199-202 organism associated with stubborn dis­ 159. Sinha, R. C., Madhosingh, C. 1980. Pro­ ease of citrus. Inti. J. Syst. Bacteriol. teins of mycoplasma-like organisms puri­ 23: 191-204 fied from clover phyllody and aster yel­ 146. Saglio, P., Whitcomb, R. F. 1979. Di­ lows-affected plants. Phytopathol. Z. versity of wall-less prokaryotes in plant 99:294-300 vascular tissue, fungi, and invertebrate 160. Somerson, N. N., Kocka, J. M., Del

by UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - Smathers Library on 11/04/09. For personal use only. animals. See Ref. 14, pp. 1-36 Giudice, R., Rose, D. L., 1982. Isolation Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1984.22:361-396. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org 147. Saillard, C. 1981. Caracterisation et tax­ of acholeplasmas and a mycoplasma onomie des sp iroplasmes. These de Doc­ from vegetables. Appl. Environ. Micro­ teur de 3e cycle, N" d'ordre: 78. Univer­ bioi. 43:412-17 site de Bordeaux II, Mai 1981 161. Sonnenwirth, A. c., McGee, Z. A., 148. Saillard, C., Dunez, J., Garcia-Jurado, Davis, B. D. 1980. Other pathogenic 0., Nhami, A., Bove, J. M. 1978. De­ microorganisms; L-phase variants (L­ tection de Sp iroplasma citri dans les fo rms). In Microbiology, ed. B. D. agrumes et les pervenches par la tech­ Davis, R. Dulbecco, H. N. Eisen, H. S. nique immunoenzymatique ELISA. C. Ginsberg . Hagerstown, Maryland: Har­ R. Acad. Sci. Paris 286: 1 245-8 per & Row. 803 pp. 3rd ed. 149. Saillard, C., Garcia-Jurado, 0., Bove, J. 162. Steiner, T., McGarrity, G. J., Bove, J. M., Vignault, J. c., Moutous, G., Fos, M., Philips, D. M., Garnier, M. 1984. A., Bonfils , J., Nhami, A., Vogel, R., Insect cell cultures to study attachment Viennot-Bourgin, G. 1980. Application and pathogenicity of spiroplasmas and WALL-LESS PROKARYOTES 395

mycoplasmas. Ann. Microbiol. (Inst. caryotes intracellulaires chez les inver­ Pasteur). 135A:47-53 tebres. Colloq. Inst. Natl. Sante Rech . 163. Stephens, E. B .• Aulakh, G. S., McCoy. MM. Les mycoplasmeslmycoplasmas . R. E .• Rose . D. L.. Tully. J. G .. Barile, 33:265-72 M. F. 1981. Lack of genetic relatedness 176. Vignault, J. C., Bove, J. M., Saillard, among some animal and plant achole­ C., Vogel. R., Farro , A., Venegas, L., plasmas by nucleic acid hybridization. Stemmer, W .• Aoki. S .• McCoy. R .• AI­ Curro Microbiol. 5:367-70 Beldawi. A. S .• Larue, M., Tuzcu. 0., 164. Townsend. R. 1983. Mycoplasma-like Ozsan. M., Nhami, A., Abassi. M .• organisms from plants with "yellows" Bonfils, J .• Moutous. G., Fos. A .• diseases lack a spiroplasma-specific anti­ Poutiers. F .• Viennot-Bourgin. G. 1980. gen. J. Gen. M icrobiol. 129: 1959-64 Mise en culture de spiroplasmes 11 partir 165. Townsend. R .. Archer. D. B. 1983. Fi­ de materiel vegetal et d' insectes prove­ bril protein in an antigen specificto Spir­ nant de pays circummediterraneens el du oplasma. J. Gen. Microbiol. 129: 199- Proche-Orient. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris . 200 290:775-80 166. Townsend. R., Archer. D. B .• Plaskitt. 177. Vignaull. J. c., Saillard. c.. Tully, J. K. A. 1980. Purification and preliminary G .• Mouches, c., Bove. J. M .. Bern­ characterization of spiroplasma fibrils. J. hard , R. 1982. Attempts 10 culture and Bacteriol. 142:694-700 characterize mycoplasma-like organisms 167. Townsend. R., Daniels, M. J. 1982. from fruit affected with apple prolifera­ Physicochemical characterization of tion disease. Rev. In/. Dis. 4:S248 plant and insect mycoplasmas. See Ref. 178. Whitcomb. R. F. 1980. The genus Spiro­ 37, pp. 268-306 plasma . Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 34:677- 168. Townsend, R., Markham. P. G., Plas­ 709 kitt, A. K. 1977. Multiplication and mor­ 179. Whitcomb. R. F. 1981. The biology of phology of Spiroplasma citri in the spiroplasmas. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 26: leafhopper Euscelis plebejus. Ann. Appl. 397-425 Bioi. 87:307- 13 180. Whitcomb. R. F. , Black. L. M. 1982. 169. Tsai, J. H. 1979. Vector transmission of Plant and arthropod mycoplasmas: A his­ mycoplasmal agents of plant diseases. torical perspective. See Ref. 37. pp. 40- See Ref. 14, pp. 265-307 81 170. Tully, J. G. 1982. Interaction of spiro­ 181. Whitcomb. R. F .• Bove. J. M. 1983. plasmas with plant, arthropodand animal Mycoplasma-plant-insect interrelation­ hosts. Rev. Inf. Dis. 4:SI 93-99 ships. In Methods in Mycoplasmology. 171. Tully, J. G., Razin, S., eds. 1983. Mycoplasma Characterization . Volume Methods in Mycoplasmology. Diagnostic I, ed. S. Razin. J. G. Tully, pp. 21-25 . Mycoplasmology. Vol. II. New York! New York: Academic London: Academic. 440 pp. 182. Whitcomb. R. F .• Clark. T. B .• Tully. J. 171a. Tully, J. G., Rose, D. L. Garcia­ G .• Chen. T. A., Bove. J. M. 1984. Jurado, 0., Vignault, J. c., Sailhird, c., Serological classification of spiroplas­ Bove,J. M., McCoy , R. E., Williamson, mas: Current status. Yale J. Bioi. Med. In D. L. 1980. Serological analysis ofa new press group of spiroplasmas. Curro Microbiol. 183. Whitcomb. R. F .• Tully. J. G. 1979. The 3:369-72 Mycoplasmas: III . Plant and Insect 172. Tully, J. G., Whitcomb, R. F. 1979. The Mycoplasmas. New York: Academic. genus Spiroplasma. In The Prokaryotes 35 1 pp. (Springer-Verlag Handbook), ed. M. P. 184. Whitcomb. R. F .• Tully. J. G .• Clark. T.

.•

by UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - Smathers Library on 11/04/09. For personal use only. Starr, H. Stolp, H. G. Truper, A. B Williamson. D. L. , Bove. J. M. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1984.22:361-396. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org Balows, H. G. Schlegel. Berlin: 1982. Revised serological classification Springer-Verlag of spiroplasmas, new provisional groups. 173. Tully, J. G., Whitcomb, R. F., Clark, H. and recommendations for serotyping F., Williams<,m, D. L. 1977. Pathogenic of isolates. Curro Microbiol. 7:291- mycoplasmas: Cultivation and vertebrate 96 pathogenicity of a new spiroplasma. Sci­ 185. Whitcomb. R. F., Tully, J. G., Rose. D. ence. 195:892-94 L.. Stephens, E. B., Smith, A .• McCoy. 174. Tully, J. G., Whitcomb, R. F., William­ R. E .• Barile. M. F. 1982. Wall-less pro­ son, D. L., Clark, H. F. 1976. Suckling karyotes from fal l flowers in central mouse cataract agent is a helical wall-free United Slales and Maryland. Curro Mic­ prokaryote (spiroplasma) pathogenic for robiol. 7:285-90 vertebrates . Nature 259(5539): 117-20 186. Whitcomb. R. F., Tully. J. G .• Wro­ 175. Vago, C., Giannotti, J., Meynadier, G., blewski, H. 1984. Spiralin: Major mem­ Morel, G. 1974. Recherches sur les pro- brane protein specific for subgroup I-I 396 BOVE

spiroplasmas. Curro Microbiol. 9:7-12 ten, S. 1977. Purification and character­ 187. Williamson, D. L., Whitcomb, R. F. ization of spiralin, the main protein of 1975. Plant mycoplasmas: A cultivable Spiroplasma citri membrane. Biochim . spiroplasma causes com stunt disease. Biophys. Acta 465:275-89 Science 188:1018--20 190. Zeigel, R. F., Clark, H. F. 1974. Elec­ 188. Windsor, I. M., Black, L. M. 1973. Re­ tron microscopy of the suckling mouse mission of symptoms of clover club leaf cataract agent: A noncultivable animal fo llowing treatment with penicillin. Phy­ pathogen possibly related to mycoplas­ topathol. 64:44-46 ma. Infect. Immun. 9:430-43 189. Wroblewski, H., Johansson, K. E., Hjer- by UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA - Smathers Library on 11/04/09. For personal use only. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1984.22:361-396. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org