DOCSLIB.ORG

Fauna of New Zealand 63: Auchenorrhyncha

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fauna of New Zealand 63: Auchenorrhyncha The Copyright notice printed on page 4 applies to the use of this PDF. This PDF is not to be posted on websites. Links should be made to: FNZ.LandcareResearch.co.nz EDITORIAL BOARD Dr R. M. Emberson, c/- Department of Ecology, P.O. Box 84, Lincoln University, New Zealand Dr M. J. Fletcher, Director of the Collections, NSW Agricultural Scientific Collections Unit, Forest Road, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia Dr R. J. B. Hoare, Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Dr M.-C. Larivière, Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Mr R. L. Palma, Natural Environment Department, Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, P.O. Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand SERIES EDITOR Dr T. K. Crosby, Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Fauna of New Zealand Ko te Aitanga Pepeke o Aotearoa Number / Nama 63 Auchenorrhyncha (Insecta: Hemiptera): catalogue M.-C. Larivière1, M. J. Fletcher2, and A. Larochelle3 1, 3 Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand 2 Industry & Investment NSW, Orange Agricultural Institute, Orange NSW 2800, Australia 1 [email protected], 2 [email protected], 3 [email protected] with colour photographs by B. E. Rhode Manaaki W h e n u a P R E S S Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealand 2010 4 Larivière, Fletcher & Larochelle (2010): Auchenorrhyncha (Insecta: Hemiptera) Copyright © Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd 2010 No part of this work covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means (graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping information retrieval systems, or otherwise) without the written permission of the publisher. Cataloguing in publication Larivière, Marie-Claude Auchenorrhyncha (Insecta: Hemiptera) : catalogue / M.-C. Larivière, M. J. Fletcher and A. Larochelle ; with colour photographs by B. E. Rhode. – Lincoln, Canterbury, N.Z. : Manaaki Whenua Press, 2010. (Fauna of New Zealand, ISSN 0111-5383 (print), ISSN 1179-7193 (online) ; no. 63). ISBN 978-0-478-34720-3 (print) ISBN 978-0-478-34721-0 (online) I. Fletcher, M. J. II. Larochelle, André, 1940 Apr. 10– III. Title IV. Series UDC 595.753 Suggested citation: Larivière, M.-C.; Fletcher, M. J.; Larochelle, A. 2010. Auchenorrhyncha (Insecta: Hemiptera): catalogue. Fauna of New Zealand 63, 232 pp. Prepared for publication by the series editor and the authors using computer-based text processing, layout, and printing at Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand. Colour photographs prepared by Dr B. E. Rhode using a 3-CCD colour video camera, software to increase depth-of-field, and the photoprocessing software PhotoShop® To access on-line extracts and medium-resolution pdfs from this series visit: http://fnz.landcareresearch.co.nz/ M~ori text by H. Jacob, Ætaki. Published by Manaaki Whenua Press, Landcare Research, P.O. Box 40, Lincoln, Canterbury, N.Z. Website: http://www.mwpress.co.nz/ Printed by PrintLink Ltd, Wellington Date of publication 16 June 2010 Front cover: Thanatodictya tillyardi Myers, family Dictyopharidae (Illustrator: D. W. Helmore). Publication of the Fauna of New Zealand series is the result of a research investment by the Foundation for Research, Science and Technology. Fauna of New Zealand 63 5 POPULAR SUMMARY HE WHAKARAPOPOTOTANGA Class Insecta Order Hemiptera Suborder Auchenorrhyncha Cicadas, leafhoppers, planthoppers, and allies (Auchenorrhyncha) The Auchenorrhyncha are generally regarded as a suborder of the Hemiptera. They include planthoppers, cicadas, froghoppers, spittlebugs, treehoppers, and leafhoppers. These insects are highly diverse and form a major component of the plant-feeding fauna of most terrestrial ecosystems. Auchenorrhyncha have adopted varied life habits on nearly Illustration / Whakaahua: Sulix tasmani (Muir), family all continents and islands (except Antarctica) and there may Delphacidae (Illustrator / Kaiwhakaahua: D. W. Helmore). be around 42 000 species described worldwide. The world fauna is divided into roughly 30 to 40 families. The number of species of better known continental faunas such as North America, Europe or Australia may include thousands of spe- Ng~ kihikihi, ng~ peke-rau, ng~ peke-tipu, me Ç r~tou cies. Compared with these larger regions the New Zealand uri tata (ar~, a ng~i Auchenorrhyncha) fauna – currently comprising 12 families, 68 genera and 196 E whakaaetia nuitia ana he pãtoi-iti a ng~i Auchenorrhyncha species – may appear relatively small but what it lacks in size nÇ ng~i Hemiptera. Kei t‘nei karangatanga ng~ ng~rara it makes up for in uniqueness, e.g., 82% of known species do peke-tipu, ng~ kihikihi, ng~ peke-poraka, ng~ p§tara-tuha, not occur anywhere else in the world. From this point of view ng~ peke-r~kau, me ng~ peke-rau. He matahuhua tonu te New Zealand can be regarded as a biodiversity “hot spot” for rÇpã nei, ~, ko r~tou t‘tahi w~hanga nui o ng~ hanga ora kai this group of insects. New genera and species will be discov- tipu o ng~ pãnaha hauropi noho papa. He maha ~ r~tou ered in the future and once fully described the New Zealand urutaunga taha whanonga i ng~ whenua me ng~ moutere fauna may reach 300 to 350 species. katoa (h~unga anÇ Te KÇ pakatanga ki te Tonga), ~, e Auchenorrhyncha can be distinguished from other Hemi- whakapaetia ana kei te ~hua 42 000 ng~ momo i ng~ tini ptera suborders on the basis of three main characteristics: kokonga o te ao, kua oti te whakaahua ~-kupu. NÇ ng~ sucking mouthparts in the form of a beak extending from the wh~nau e 30–40 ‘nei momo. T‘r~ pea kei ng~ mano ng~ back of the head – the name Auchenorrhyncha literally means momo o ‘tahi o ng~ taupori e kaha ake ana te mÇhiotia, “neck-beaks”; relatively short and bristle-like antennae; and p‘r~ i ‘r~ o Amerika ki te Raki, o âropi, o Ahitereiria. Ina forewings of uniform texture (entirely membranous or leath- whakatairitea ng~ mea o konei ki ‘r~, he huinga iti tonu, in~ ery) resting rooflike over the abdomen. r~, 12 ng~ wh~nau, e, 68 ng~ puninga, 196 ng~ momo. In this volume, four questions most commonly asked Engari ahakoa iti, he pounamu. In~ r~, ko t‘tahi 82% o ng~ about a group of insects are being answered: What, where, momo o konei e mÇhiotia ana, k~ore i whenua k‘. N~ reira when and how? What Auchenorrhyncha occur in New Zealand, me k§ p‘nei ake, he w~hi whakahirahira a Aotearoa mÇ te what is their status (e.g., native, introduced from elsewhere, matahuhua-koiora o t‘nei karangatanga pepeke. K~ore e pests, disease vectors)? What are the resources available to kore ka kitea he puninga anÇ, he momo anÇ ~ tÇna w~, ~, ina identify and study them? Where do species and genera occur oti te whakaahua ~-kupu, t‘r~ ka piki te maha o ng~ momo (e.g., geographic distribution in New Zealand and overseas, ki te 300–350. habitats, dispersal abilities)? When are they active (e.g., sea- E toru ng~ ~huatanga matua e noho wehe ai ng~ sonal activity, mating, egg-laying, wintering)? How do they Auchenorrhyncha i ‘r~ atu pãtoi-iti o ng~i Hemiptera: ko live (e.g., food preferences, hostplants, natural enemies)? ng~ w~hanga ngote o te waha – ar~, he ngutu e toro ana atu New Zealand Auchenorrhyncha are generally active dur- i te murikÇ kai — ko te tikanga hoki o te ingoa ing the day and live in lowland to mountain forests and Auchenorrhyncha, ko te “ngutu-kak§”; ko te poto o ng~ shrublands, although a number of groups are typically found pãhihi — me te tarakina te rite; kotahi anÇ te kakano o ng~ in more open habitats, such as tussock grasslands, and in parihau o mua (he kiriuhi katoa, he kirikau katoa r~nei) e subalpine environments. Native species usually live within noho ‘tuanui’ mai ana ki te puku. the confines of their natural habitats but some species also I t‘nei putanga, ka whakautua ng~ momo p~tai e wh~ e live in modified ecosystems and exotic tree plantations. De- uia nuitia ana mÇ ng~ aitanga pepeke, koia ‘nei: he aha, kei pending on families and genera, species can be predominantly hea, ~hea, p‘hea? He aha ng~ Auchenorrhyncha kei Aotearoa active on low plants, trees and shrubs, or even the ground e noho ana, he aha Ç r~tou tãranga (e.g., he momo m~ori, surface. Hostplants are known for less than 20% of species. he r~waho, he momo takakino, he whakawhiti tahumaero)? The recognisable features and biology of the immature stages He aha ng~ rauemi e w~tea ana hei tautohu, hei rangahau i (nymphs) are unknown for the majority of species. Anec- ng~ pepeke nei? Kei hea ake ng~ momo me ng~ puninga dotal evidence suggests that parasitic wasps, birds, predatory (e.g., i Aotearoa, i t~w~hi, ng~ k~inga noho, te kaha ki te beetles, spiders, and mites may be among the major natural whakap§rara haere)? }hea ka kori ake (e.g., ng~ koringa ~- enemies of New Zealand Auchenorrhyncha. Overall, about kaupeka, te whakaputa uri, te wh~nau hua, te ~hua i te 25% of the fauna is short-winged or wingless. Active dispersal takurua)? He p‘hea te ~hua o te noho (e.g., ng~ tino kai, ng~ by flight is therefore unlikely for these species. tipu ka ~ta nohoia, ng~ hoariri m~ori)? (continued overleaf) (haere tonu) 6 The described New Zealand fauna, with 196 species, is Ko te nuinga o ng~ Auchenorrhyncha o Aotearoa, he about 13% the size of the known Australian fauna which has kori awatea. Kitea ai i ng~ ngahere me ng~ w~hi ururua mai around 1500 species.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hemiptera: Fulgoroidea: Delphacidae)
    Liang & Jiang: First Record and a New Species of Punana 351 PUNANA SINICA NEW SPECIES AND FIRST RECORD OF THE GENUS FROM CHINA (HEMIPTERA: FULGOROIDEA: DELPHACIDAE) AI-PING LIANG AND GUO-MEI JIANG Department of Entomology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences 19 Zhongguancun Road, Beijing 100080, P.R. China ABSTRACT Punana sinica Liang sp. nov. (Hemiptera: Fulgoroidea: Delphacidae) is described and illus- trated from Sichuan, southwest China. This represents the first record of the genus Punana Muir from China and the fifth known species of Punana. The new taxon extends the range of the genus Punana northward considerably, previously known only from southeast Asia and south India. A key for separation of the species of Punana is included. Key Words: Punana, new species, Delphacidae, Fulgoroidea, China RESUMEN Se describe y se ilustra Punana sinica sp. nov. (Hemiptera: Fulgoroidea: Delphacidae) de Si- chuan, en el suroeste de China. Este representa el primer registro del género Punana Muir en China y la quinta especie de Punana conocida en el mundo. Este nuevo taxón extiende la distribución geográfica del género Punana hacia el norte considerablemente, que antes se co- nocía solamente en el suroeste de Asia y en el sur de la India. The Delphacidae is the largest family of the The genus Punana was described by Muir Fulgoroidea, comprising more than 2000 de- (1913) for P. brunnea Muir from Borneo. Asche scribed species in approximately 300 genera and (1983) correctly separated Punana from six subfamilies worldwide (Asche 1985, 1990). Neopunana (8 species, the Caribbean) and Equa- Members of the group are predominantly mono- systatus (monotypic, Ecuador).
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 73, Number
    New Zealand Science Review Vol 73 (3–4) 2016 Symposium on Systematics and Biodiversity in honour of Dr Dennis P. Gordon Official Journal of the New Zealand Association of Scientists ISSN 0028-8667 New Zealand Science Review Vol 73 (3–4) 2016 Official Journal of the New Zealand Association of Scientists P O Box 1874, Wellington www.scientists.org.nz A forum for the exchange of views on science and science policy Managing Editor: Allen Petrey Contents Guest Editor: Daniel Leduc Production Editor: Geoff Gregory Editorial .....................................................................................................................................................61 Proceedings of a Symposium on Systematics and Biodiversity: Past, Present and Future, National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research, Wellington, April 2016 Bryozoa—not a minor phylum – Dennis P. Gordon and Mark J. Costello ..................................................63 The contribution of Dennis P. Gordon to the understanding of New Zealand Bryozoa – Abigail M Smith, Philip Bock and Peter Batson ................................................................................67 The study of taxonomy and systematics enhances ecological and conservation science – Ashley A. Rowden ............................................................................................................................72 Taxonomic research, collections and associated databases – and the changing science scene in New Zealand – Wendy Nelson .............................................................................79
    [Show full text]
  • Charles R. Bartlett & Gernot Kunz (2015) A
    Zootaxa 3963 (4): 598–600 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Erratum ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3963.4.7 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:374DEA43-B853-4291-8CB9-17C59DE8BDDB CHARLES R. BARTLETT & GERNOT KUNZ (2015) A new genus and species of delphacid planthopper (Hemiptera: Fulgoroidea: Delphacidae) from Central America with a preliminary regional species list. Zootaxa, 3946(4): 510–518. Table 1 was inadvertently omitted from the text. It is provided as follows. Table 1. List of delphacid species found in Costa Rica and adjacent countries (L = literature record, S = specimen record, E = error). Costa Species Nicaragua Rica Panama References and Comments Delphacidae Asiracinae: Asiracini Metcalf 1943, Maes & O’Brien 1988, Maes & Tellez Robleto 1988, Bartlett Copicerus irroratus Swartz, 1802 L, S L, S L, S et al. 2014 Asiracinae: Idiosystanini Metcalf 1943, Maes & Tellez Robleto 1988, Hedrick-Zeller & Wilson 2010; Pentagramma bivittata Crawford, 1914 L, S L, S Bartlett et al. 2014 Asiracinae: Tetrasteirini Tetrasteira solata Barringer & Bartlett, 2011 L, S Barringer & Bartlett 2011 Tetrasteira trimaculata Barringer & Bartlett 2011 L, S L, S Barringer & Bartlett 2011 Asiracinae: Ugyopini Ugyops brunneus (Fowler, 1905) L Fowler 1905, Metcalf 1943 Ugyops godmani (Fowler, 1905) L L, S Fowler 1905, Metcalf 1943 Ugyops palliatus Fennah, 1964 L Fennah 1964 Ugyops stigmatus (Crawford, 1914) L, S Crawford, 1914, Metcalf 1938, 1943 Ugyops sp. S Plesiodelphacinae Crawford, 1914, Maes & O’Brien Burnilia pictifrons (Stål, 1864) L 1988 Burnilia n. sp. S Delphacinae: Saccharosydnini Neomalaxa flava Muir, 1918 S S Maes & O’Brien 1988, Maes & Saccharosydne saccharivora Tellez Robleto 1988, Bartlett et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Programa Fondecyt Informe Final Etapa 2015 Comisión Nacional De Investigacion Científica Y Tecnológica Version Oficial Nº 2
    PROGRAMA FONDECYT INFORME FINAL ETAPA 2015 COMISIÓN NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACION CIENTÍFICA Y TECNOLÓGICA VERSION OFICIAL Nº 2 FECHA: 24/12/2015 Nº PROYECTO : 3130417 DURACIÓN : 3 años AÑO ETAPA : 2015 TÍTULO PROYECTO : EVOLUTIONARY AND DEVELOPMENTAL HISTORY OF THE DIVERSITY OF FLORAL CHARACTERS WITHIN OXALIDALES DISCIPLINA PRINCIPAL : BOTANICA GRUPO DE ESTUDIO : BIOLOGIA 1 INVESTIGADOR(A) RESPONSABLE : KESTER JOHN BULL HEREÑU DIRECCIÓN : COMUNA : CIUDAD : REGIÓN : METROPOLITANA FONDO NACIONAL DE DESARROLLO CIENTIFICO Y TECNOLOGICO (FONDECYT) Moneda 1375, Santiago de Chile - casilla 297-V, Santiago 21 Telefono: 2435 4350 FAX 2365 4435 Email: [email protected] INFORME FINAL PROYECTO FONDECYT POSTDOCTORADO OBJETIVOS Cumplimiento de los Objetivos planteados en la etapa final, o pendientes de cumplir. Recuerde que en esta sección debe referirse a objetivos desarrollados, NO listar actividades desarrolladas. Nº OBJETIVOS CUMPLIMIENTO FUNDAMENTO 1 1. Creating a database of morphological TOTAL La base de datos ya se encuentra en el sistema characters of perianth and androecium in the 52 PROTEUS y cuenta con el 733 registros genera of the Oxalidales from data gained from correspondientes a información acerca de 24 literature revision and direct observation of living variables morfológicas para 56 taxa de los collection and herbaria. Traits to be considered Oxalidales representando las siete familias y 51 are: presence or absence of calix and corolla, géneros del orden. aestivation pattern of calix and corolla, number of stamina, number of androecial cycles, relative position of stamina cycles (alternate-opposite), direction of stamen initiation, kind of stamina proliferation (primary or secondary). 2 2. Reconstructing the character state evolution of TOTAL Se ha hecho el estudio de reconstrucción de the abovementioned attributes using the available estados de carácter en base a parsimonia con phylogenetic data.
    [Show full text]
  • International Auchenorrhyncha Congress
    Program and Abstracts and Program 16 th I NTERNATIONAL Cuc Phuong NP, th Vietnam 16 July 2 nd - 8 th 2019 A INTERNATIONAL UCHENORRHYNCHA AUCHENORRHYNCHA CONGRESS C ONGRESS 12 th International Workshop on Leafhoppers and Planthoppers of Economic Signicance 12 th International Workshop on Leafhoppers and Planthoppers o Planthoppers and on Leafhoppers Workshop International Program and Abstracts f Economic Signi0cance f Economic Organized by: Vietnam National Museum of Nature, VAST 16th INTERNATIONAL AUCHENORRHYNCHA CONGRESS 12 th International Workshop on Leafhoppers and Planthoppers of Economic Signicance Cuc Phuong NP, Vietnam July 2nd - 8 th , 2019 Program and Abstracts Organized by: Vietnam National Museum of Nature, VAST IAC 2019 July 2 nd -8 th 2019, Cuc Phuong, Vietnam 16 th International Auchenorrhyncha Congress and the 12 th International Workshop on Leafhoppers and Planthoppers of Economic Significance (IAC 2019) is being organized by the following committees: Organizers: Vietnam National Museum of Nature, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology Organizing Committee: 1. Nguyen Trung Minh, Chairman (VNMN) 2. Tran The Lien (MARD) 3. Nguyen Thanh Vinh (MONRE) 4. Vu Van Lien (VNMN) 5. Phan Ke Long (VNMN) 6. Truong Quang Bich (Cuc Phuong NP) 7. Do Van Lap (Cuc Phuong NP) 8. Pham Hong Thai (VNMN) 9. Nguyen Quoc Binh (VNMN) 10. Pham Dinh Sac (VNMN) 11. Nguyen Thien Tao (VNMN) 12. Nguyen Thanh Tuan (VNMN) Scientific Committee: 1. Thierry Bourgoin, Chairman (France) 2. Murray Fletcher (Australia) 3. Chris Dietrich (USA) 4. Vladimir Gnezdilov (Russia) 5. Masami Hayashi (Japan) 6. Mike Wilson (UK) 7. Vu Quang Con (Vietnam) 8. Pham Hong Thai (Vietnam) 9.
    [Show full text]
  • The Planthopper Genus Trypetimorpha: Systematics and Phylogenetic Relationships (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Tropiduchidae)
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL HISTORY, 1993, 27, 609-629 The planthopper genus Trypetimorpha: systematics and phylogenetic relationships (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Tropiduchidae) J. HUANG and T. BOURGOINt* Pomological Institute of Shijiazhuang, Agricultural and Forestry Academy of Sciences of Hebei, 5-7 Street, 050061, Shijiazhuang, China t Mus#um National d'Histoire Naturelle, Laboratoire d'Entomologie, 45 rue Buffon, F-75005, Paris, France (Accepted 28 January 1993) The genus Trypetimorpha is revised with the eight currently recognized species described or re-described. Four new species are described and seven new synonymies are proposed. Within Trypetimorphini sensu Fennah (1982), evidences for the monophyly of each genus are selected, but Caffrommatissus is transferred to the Cixiopsini. Monophyly of Trypetimorphini, restricted to Trypetimorpha and Ommatissus, is discussed. A key is given for the following Trypetimorpha species: (1) T. fenestrata Costa ( = T. pilosa Horvfith, syn. n.); (2) T. biermani Dammerman (= T. biermani Muir, syn. n.; = T. china (Wu), syn. n.; = T. formosana Ishihara, syn. n.); (3) T. japonica Ishihara ( = T. koreana Kwon and Lee, syn. n.); (4) T. canopus Linnavuori; (5) T. occidentalis, sp. n. (= T. fenestrata Costa, sensu Horvfith); (6) T. aschei, sp. n., from New Guinea; (7) T. wilsoni, sp. n., from Australia; (8) T. sizhengi, sp. n., from China and Viet Nam. Study of the type specimens of T. fenestrata Costa shows that they are different from T. fenestrata sensu Horvfith as usually accepted, which one is redescribed here as T. occidentalis. KEYWORDS: Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Tropiduchidae, Trypetimorpha, Ommatissus, Cafrommatissus, systematics, phylogeny. Downloaded by [University of Delaware] at 10:13 13 January 2016 Introduction This revision arose as the result of a study of the Chinese Fulgoromorpha of economic importance (Chou et al., 1985) and the opportunity for J.H.
    [Show full text]
  • Correlation of Stylet Activities by the Glassy-Winged Sharpshooter, Homalodisca Coagulata (Say), with Electrical Penetration Graph (EPG) Waveforms
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Journal of Insect Physiology 52 (2006) 327–337 www.elsevier.com/locate/jinsphys Correlation of stylet activities by the glassy-winged sharpshooter, Homalodisca coagulata (Say), with electrical penetration graph (EPG) waveforms P. Houston Joosta, Elaine A. Backusb,Ã, David Morganc, Fengming Yand aDepartment of Entomology, University of Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA bUSDA-ARS Crop Diseases, Pests and Genetics Research Unit, San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center, 9611 South Riverbend Ave, Parlier, CA 93648, USA cCalifornia Department of Food and Agriculture, Mt. Rubidoux Field Station, 4500 Glenwood Dr., Bldg. E, Riverside, CA 92501, USA dCollege of Life Sciences, Peking Univerisity, Beijing, China Received 5 May 2005; received in revised form 29 November 2005; accepted 29 November 2005 Abstract Glassy-winged sharpshooter, Homalodisca coagulata (Say), is an efficient vector of Xylella fastidiosa (Xf), the causal bacterium of Pierce’s disease, and leaf scorch in almond and oleander. Acquisition and inoculation of Xf occur sometime during the process of stylet penetration into the plant. That process is most rigorously studied via electrical penetration graph (EPG) monitoring of insect feeding. This study provides part of the crucial biological meanings that define the waveforms of each new insect species recorded by EPG. By synchronizing AC EPG waveforms with high-magnification video of H. coagulata stylet penetration in artifical diet, we correlated stylet activities with three previously described EPG pathway waveforms, A1, B1 and B2, as well as one ingestion waveform, C. Waveform A1 occured at the beginning of stylet penetration. This waveform was correlated with salivary sheath trunk formation, repetitive stylet movements involving retraction of both maxillary stylets and one mandibular stylet, extension of the stylet fascicle, and the fluttering-like movements of the maxillary stylet tips.
    [Show full text]
  • The First New Zealand Insects Collected on Cook's
    Pacific Science (1989), vol.43, 43, nono.. 1 © 1989 by UniversityUniversity of Hawaii Press.Pres s. All rights reserved TheThe First New Zealand Zealand InsectsInsects CollectedCollectedon Cook'sCook's Endeavour Voyage!Voyage! 2 J. R. H. AANDREWSNDREWS2 AND G.G . W. GIBBSGmBS ABSTRACT:ABSTRACT: The Banks collection of 40 insect species, species, described by J. J. C.C. Fabricius in 1775,1775, is critically examined to explore the possible methods of collection and to document changesto the inseinsectct fauna andto the original collection localities sincsincee 1769.The1769. The aassemblagessemblageof species is is regarded as unusual. unusual. It includes insects that are large large and colorful as well as those that are small and cryptic;cryptic; some species that were probably common were overlooked, but others that are today rare were taken.taken. It is concluded that the Cook naturalists caught about 15species with a butterfly net, but that the majority (all CoColeoptera)leoptera) were discoveredin conjunction with other biobiologicallogical specimens, especially plantsplants.. PossibPossiblele reasons for the omission ofwetwetasas,, stick insects, insects, etc.,etc., are discussed. discussed. This early collection shows that marked changesin abundance may have occurred in some speciespeciess since European colonizationcolonization.. One newrecord is is revealed:revealed: The cicada NotopsaltaNotopsaltasericea sericea (Walker) was found to be among the Fabricius speci­speci­ mens from New Zealand,Zealand, but itsits description evidentlyevidently
    [Show full text]
  • The Leafhoppers of Minnesota
    Technical Bulletin 155 June 1942 The Leafhoppers of Minnesota Homoptera: Cicadellidae JOHN T. MEDLER Division of Entomology and Economic Zoology University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station The Leafhoppers of Minnesota Homoptera: Cicadellidae JOHN T. MEDLER Division of Entomology and Economic Zoology University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Accepted for publication June 19, 1942 CONTENTS Page Introduction 3 Acknowledgments 3 Sources of material 4 Systematic treatment 4 Eurymelinae 6 Macropsinae 12 Agalliinae 22 Bythoscopinae 25 Penthimiinae 26 Gyponinae 26 Ledrinae 31 Amblycephalinae 31 Evacanthinae 37 Aphrodinae 38 Dorydiinae 40 Jassinae 43 Athysaninae 43 Balcluthinae 120 Cicadellinae 122 Literature cited 163 Plates 171 Index of plant names 190 Index of leafhopper names 190 2M-6-42 The Leafhoppers of Minnesota John T. Medler INTRODUCTION HIS bulletin attempts to present as accurate and complete a T guide to the leafhoppers of Minnesota as possible within the limits of the material available for study. It is realized that cer- tain groups could not be treated completely because of the lack of available material. Nevertheless, it is hoped that in its present form this treatise will serve as a convenient and useful manual for the systematic and economic worker concerned with the forms of the upper Mississippi Valley. In all cases a reference to the original description of the species and genus is given. Keys are included for the separation of species, genera, and supergeneric groups. In addition to the keys a brief diagnostic description of the important characters of each species is given. Extended descriptions or long lists of references have been omitted since citations to this literature are available from other sources if ac- tually needed (Van Duzee, 1917).
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Insects: a Hidden Biodiversity Crisis? 1
    Chapter 7—Terrestrial Insects: A Hidden Biodiversity Crisis? 1 Chapter 7 Terrestrial Insects: A Hidden Biodiversity Crisis? C.H. Dietrich Illinois Natural History Survey OBJECTIVES Like most other elements of the biota, the terrestrial insect fauna of Illinois has undergone drastic change since European colonization of the state. Although data are sparse or entirely lacking for most species, it is clear that many formerly abundant native species are now exceedingly rare while a few previously uncommon or undocumented species, both native and exotic, are now abundant. Much of this change may be attributable to fragmentation and loss of native habitats (e.g., deforestation, draining of wetlands, agricultural conversion and intensification, urbanization), although other factors such as invasion by exotic species (including plants, insects and pathogens), misuse of pesticides, and improper management of native ecosystems have probably also been involved. Data from Illinois and elsewhere in the north temperate zone provide evidence that at least some groups of terrestrial insects have undergone dramatic declines over the past several decades, suggesting that insects are no less vulnerable to anthropogenic environmental change than other groups of organisms Yet, insects continue to be under-represented on official lists of threatened or endangered species and conservation programs focus primarily on vertebrates and plants. This chapter summarizes available information on long-term changes in the terrestrial insect fauna of Illinois, reviews possible causes for these changes, highlights some urgent research needs, and provides recommendations for conservation and management of terrestrial insect communities. INTRODUCTION Insects are among the most important “little things that run the world” (1).
    [Show full text]
  • Diet of Breeding White-Throated and Black Swifts in Southern California
    DIET OF BREEDING WHITE-THROATED AND BLACK SWIFTS IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ALLISON D. RUDALEVIGE, DESSlE L. A. UNDERWOOD, and CHARLES T. COLLINS, Department of BiologicalSciences, California State University,Long Beach, California 90840 (current addressof Rudalevige:Biology Department, Universityof California,Riverside, California 92521) ABSTRACT: We analyzed the diet of nestling White-throated(Aeronautes saxatalis) and Black Swifts (Cypseloidesniger) in southern California. White- throatedSwifts fed their nestlingson bolusesof insectsmore taxonomicallydiverse, on average(over 50 arthropodfamilies represented), than did BlackSwifts (seven arthropodfamilies, primarfiy ants). In some casesWhite-throated Swift boluses containedprimarily one species,while other bolusesshowed more variation.In contrast,all BlackSwift samplescontained high numbersof wingedants with few individualsof other taxa. Our resultsprovide new informationon the White-throated Swift'sdiet and supportprevious studies of the BlackSwift. Swiftsare amongthe mostaerial of birds,spending most of the day on the wing in searchof their arthropodprey. Food itemsinclude a wide array of insectsand some ballooningspiders, all gatheredaloft in the air column (Lack and Owen 1955). The food habitsof a numberof speciesof swifts have been recorded(Collins 1968, Hespenheide1975, Lack and Owen 1955, Marfn 1999, Tarburton 1986, 1993), but there is stilllittle informa- tion availablefor others, even for some speciesthat are widespreadand common.Here we providedata on the prey sizeand compositionof food broughtto nestlingsof the White-throated(Aerona u tes saxa talis) and Black (Cypseloidesniger) Swifts in southernCalifornia. The White-throatedSwift is a commonresident that nestswidely in southernCalifornia, while the Black Swift is a local summerresident, migrating south in late August (Garrettand Dunn 1981, Foersterand Collins 1990). METHODS When feedingyoung, swifts of the subfamiliesApodinae and Chaeturinae return to the nest with a bolusof food in their mouths(Collins 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • Marginal Evidence for Taro Production in Northern New Zealand
    LETTER REPLY TO BARBER: Marginal evidence for taro production in northern LETTER New Zealand between 1200 and 1500 CE Matthew Prebblea,1, Atholl J. Andersona, Paul Augustinusb, Joshua Emmittc, Stewart J. Fallond, Louise L. Fureye, Simon J. Holdawayc, Alex Jorgensenc, Thegn N. Ladefogedc,f, Peter J. Matthewsg, Jean-Yves Meyerh, Rebecca Phillippsc, Rod Wallacec, and Nicholas Porchi We welcome Barber’s (1) comments and are grateful for not meet widely accepted criteria for high-precision the opportunity to respond. Our study of wetland taro dating, as they contain mixed carbon sources (9). (Colocasia esculenta) gardens during the initial coloni- 3) Description of crop ecosystems: Ancient crop ecosys- zation period (ICP) (1200 to 1500 CE) in New Zealand tems cannot be described without comprehensive did not overlook the evidence from the Aupouri Penin- analyses of biological remains from archaeological sula (2–4). We agree that gardens were probably estab- contexts. At Polynesian arrival, the Motutangi wet- lished on mainland New Zealand, within the climate lands were dominated by the large-statured conifer envelope shown in figure 1 of our paper (4), but in areas Dacrydium cupressinum, requiring repeated firing to that lacked large-statured forests at Polynesian arrival. establish gardens, and Restionaceae (3), most likely However, the fossil evidence from Motutangi does not Apodasmia similis, a rush which dominates the mar- meet the 3 criteria for defining ICP taro gardens met in gins of regularly flooded estuaries or lakes and out- our study of Ahuahu and subtropical French Polynesia: competes other plants in nutrient-poor soils (10). This densely spreading rush likely posed difficulties for 1) Reliable fossil proxies: We identify pollen, the crop cultivation, although taro may have been com- most reliable fossil proxy for taro (5), but also clus- petitive if grown in clumps over multiple sea- ters of small globular orbicular starch grains inside sons.
    [Show full text]