DOCSLIB.ORG

Scoping Study on Addressing Illegal Harvesting of Aquatic Endangered, Threatened Or Protected (Etp) Species for Consumption and Trade

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Scoping Study on Addressing Illegal Harvesting of Aquatic Endangered, Threatened Or Protected (Etp) Species for Consumption and Trade Christelle Dyc – PhD in biology an ecology, environmental Abidjan, 20th October 2017 pollution specialization https://www.wabicc.org/en/resource-centers/documents/ SCOPING STUDY ON ADDRESSING ILLEGAL HARVESTING OF AQUATIC ENDANGERED, THREATENED OR PROTECTED (ETP) SPECIES FOR CONSUMPTION AND TRADE As part of the West Africa biodiversity and Climate Change (WABiCC) program DELIVERABLE N°6: FINAL SCOPING REPORT ON “ADDRESSING ILLEGAL HARVESTING OF AQUATIC ENDANGERED, THREATENED OR PROTECTED (ETP) SPECIES FOR CONSUMPTION, AND TRADE” Email: [email protected] Tel.: +225 44 02 19 17 (Côte d’Ivoire) / +32 495 496 007 (Belgium) Christelle Dyc – PhD in biology an ecology, environmental Abidjan, 20th October 2017 pollution specialization Table of content 1. Categorization of the issue ............................................................................................................................... 3 1.1. Chondrichthyans ....................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1.1. sharks, rays excluded .......................................................................................................................... 3 a) Status ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1.2. Rays ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 a) Status ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1.3. Conservation actions for shark and ray species............................................................................... 6 1.2. Actinopterygii ............................................................................................................................................ 8 1.2.1. Syngnathidae ........................................................................................................................................ 8 a) Status ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 b) Conservation actions .............................................................................................................................. 9 1.3. Aquatic Mammalia ..................................................................................................................................... 9 1.3.1. Cetaceans ............................................................................................................................................. 9 c) Status ...................................................................................................................................................... 9 d) Conservation actions ............................................................................................................................ 11 1.3.2. Hippopotamus .................................................................................................................................... 12 e) Status .................................................................................................................................................... 12 f) Conservation actions ............................................................................................................................ 13 1.3.3. Manatees ............................................................................................................................................. 15 a) Status .................................................................................................................................................... 15 b) Conservation actions ............................................................................................................................ 16 1.4. Reptilia ..................................................................................................................................................... 17 1.4.1. Crocodiles ........................................................................................................................................... 17 a) Status .................................................................................................................................................... 17 b) Conservation actions ............................................................................................................................ 19 1.4.2. Marine turtles ...................................................................................................................................... 19 a) Status .................................................................................................................................................... 19 b) Conservation actions ............................................................................................................................ 22 1.5. Aquatic Aves ........................................................................................................................................... 26 a) Status .................................................................................................................................................... 26 b) Conservation actions ............................................................................................................................ 29 2. Annexes ............................................................................................................................................................ 31 2.1. Status information of the identified Chondrichthyan species ............................................................ 31 2.2. Status information of the identified Actinopterygii species ............................................................... 33 2.3. Status information of the identified aquatic Mammalia species......................................................... 33 2.4. Status information of the identified aquatic Reptilia species ............................................................. 35 2.5. Status information of the identified aquatic Aves species ................................................................. 36 3. Bibliography ..................................................................................................................................................... 40 2 Email: [email protected] Tel.: +225 44 02 19 17 (Côte d’Ivoire) / +32 495 496 007 (Belgium) Christelle Dyc – PhD in biology an ecology, environmental Abidjan, 20th October 2017 pollution specialization 1. CATEGORIZATION OF THE ISSUE 1.1. CHONDRICHTHYANS Chondrichthyan fishes included sharks, rays and chimaeras. In the present work, only sharks and rays are discussed. The term shark was used for the hammerhead, sawfish and shark species while the term ray was used for the ray and guitarfish species. Experts stated that chondrichthyan extinction risk is considered as higher than most other vertebrates: five of the seven most threatened families are rays and only one-third of species are considered as safe (Dulvy et al., 2014). In addition, one-quarter of the chondrichthyan population are threatened, according to IUCN Red List criteria, due to targeted and incidental overfishing. Fishery pressure is indeed increasing due to (i) lesser access of targeted population species as they are declining and (ii) high and/or rising value of their derived products (e.g. meat, fins, livers and gill rakers) (Lack and Sant, 2009). In West Africa, the global status of chondrichthyan species is worsening and some are already locally extinct (e.g. the sawfish and the guitarfish) while others (e.g. the great hammerhead shark) are threatened. A decreasing trend is observed in the region which is most likely due to the fewer availability of the species (e.g. the almost complete disappearance of the sawfish species, and a scarcity of guitarfish and large hammerhead sharks (Diop and Dossa, 2011)). Among the shark and ray related products, fins are reported as one of the most valuable seafood products. Twenty- six to seventy-three millions of specimens are caught and traded yearly for a value ranging from US$400 to US$ 550 millions (Clarke and Bjorndal, 2007). The main driver of shark fishing is the globalized trade to meet the Asian demand for shark fin soup1. In the past 20 years, the Asian chondrichthyan fin market was indeed the driving force behind the fishing business. Hong Kong, Taiwan and, to a lesser extent, Singapore and Japan were the final destinations of almost all the worldwide production of chondrichthyan fins. In West Africa, two main networks are operating in the shark and ray trade context. The first one is linked to the local market and targeted the meat (i.e. salted-dried or smoked) while the second one is linked to South East Asia export market and mainly targeted the fins. The environment of the west African coast is considered as fully exploited and amongst the most intensively fished areas worldwide (Zeeberg, Corten and de Graaf, 2006). The high market value, especially of fins, led to the development of targeted small scale and semi-industrial fishery activities among which artisanal fishery seems to account for the higher number of chondrichthyan catch (Diop and Dossa, 2011). Fishermen
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (Etp) Species in West Africa
    Issue Brief AN OVERVIEW OF THE ILLEGAL HARVEST OF AQUATIC ENDANGERED, THREATENED OR PROTECTED (ETP) SPECIES IN WEST AFRICA AQUATIC WILDMEAT: THE PLIGHT OF THREATENENED AQUATIC SPECIES Throughout West Africa, declining fisheries resources and rising human populations have accelerated the displacement WHAT IS AQUATIC BUSHMEAT? of many communities from their traditional food sources. This Aquatic wild meat, sometimes referred to in turn is driving new forms of aquatic meat consumption, as as aquatic bushmeat, is defined as the meat well as the rise of illegal local and international trade aimed at of aquatic species harvested and used by revenue generation. As a consequence, this aquatic harvest is humans as food resources, medicines and/ now seriously impacting large aquatic mammal, reptile and avian or cultural/ traditional items (e.g. religious biodiversity in the region. This aquatic harvest is ‘falling through items). Aquatic wildmeat includes marine the cracks’ between environment and fisheries Ministries, mammals such as manatees, cetaceans and agencies and international processes. hippopotamus, reptiles such as crocodiles and marine turtles, fish (sharks and rays), and In West Africa, as worldwide, aquatic species have been aquatic birds (herons, pelicans and storks harvested for decades by local populations. Some of the most amongst others). famous human uses are (1) the trade of the hawksbill marine turtle’ shell (bekko) through Japanese networks, (2) the consumption of manatee’s or marine turtle’s meat by coastal populations and (3) the harvest of sharks for their fins for the Asian market (Miliken & Tokunaga 1987; Groombridge & Luxmoore 1989; Diop & Dossa 2011). A WIDE VARIETY OF AQUATIC SPECIES ARE THREATENED Over time, aquatic bushmeat consumption, increasing human populations and poorly enforced measures punishing the use or trade of these aquatic species, could threaten the survival of many aquatic species.
    [Show full text]
  • West Africa Biodiversity and Climate Change (WA Bicc)
    Christelle Dyc – PhD in biology an ecology, environmental Abidjan, 20th October 2017 pollution specialization West Africa Biodiversity and Climate Change (WA BiCC) SCOPING STUDY ON ADDRESSING ILLEGAL HARVESTING OF AQUATIC ENDANGERED, THREATENED OR PROTECTED (ETP) SPECIES FOR CONSUMPTION AND TRADE DELIVERABLE N°6: FINAL SCOPING REPORT ON “ADDRESSING ILLEGAL HARVESTING OF AQUATIC ENDANGERED, THREATENED OR PROTECTED (ETP) SPECIES FOR CONSUMPTION, AND TRADE” Email: [email protected] Tel.: +225 44 02 19 17 (Côte d’Ivoire) / +32 495 496 007 (Belgium) Christelle Dyc – PhD in biology an ecology, environmental Abidjan, 20th October 2017 pollution specialization Table of content 1. Categorization of the issue ............................................................................................................................... 3 1.1. Chondrichthyans ....................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1.1. sharks, rays excluded .......................................................................................................................... 3 a) Status ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1.2. Rays ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 a) Status .....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download The
    ISSN 1198-6727 Fisheries Centre Research Reports 2011 Volume 19 Number 2 Tracking the international trade of seahorses (Hippocampus species) Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, Canada Tracking the international trade of seahorses ( Hippocampus species) by Melissa Evanson, Sarah J. Foster, Stefan Wiswedel & Amanda C. J. Vincent Fisheries Centre Research Reports 19(2) 104 pages © published 2011 by The Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia 2202 Main Mall Vancouver, B.C., Canada, V6T 1Z4 ISSN 1198-6727 Fisheries Centre Research Reports 19(2) 2011 TRACKING THE INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN SEAHORSES (HIPPOCAMPUS SPECIES ) by Melissa Evanson, Sarah J. Foster, Stefan Wiswedel & Amanda C. J. Vincent CONTENTS Page DIRECTOR ’S FOREWORD ......................................................................................................................................... 1 ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 METHODS ............................................................................................................................................................... 5 Trade Data Sources...................................................................................................................................... 5 Trade
    [Show full text]
  • TRAFFIC Bulletin Volume 32, No. 1
    TRAFFIC 1 BULLETIN VOL. 32 NO. 1 32 NO. VOL. TRAFFIC is a leading non-governmental organisation working globally on trade in wild animals and plants in the context of both biodiversity conservation and sustainable development. For further information contact: The Executive Director TRAFFIC David Attenborough Building Pembroke Street Cambridge CB2 3QZ UK Telephone: (44) (0) 1223 277427 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.traffic.org IMPACT OF TRADE AND CLIMATE CHANGE ON NARWHAL POPULATIONS With thanks to The Rufford Foundation for contributimg to the production costs of the TRAFFIC Bulletin DRIED SEAHORSES FROM AFRICA TO ASIA is a strategic alliance of APRIL 2020 EEL TRADE REVIEW The journal of TRAFFIC disseminates information on the trade in wild animal and plant resources 32(1) NARWHAL COVER FINAL.indd 1 05/05/2020 13:05:11 GLOBAL TRAFFIC was established TRAFFIC International David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3QZ, UK. in 1976 to perform what Tel: (44) 1223 277427; E-mail: [email protected] AFRICA remains a unique role as a Central Africa Office c/o IUCN, Regional Office for Central Africa, global specialist, leading and PO Box 5506, Yaoundé, Cameroon. Tel: (237) 2206 7409; Fax: (237) 2221 6497; E-mail: [email protected] supporting efforts to identify Southern Africa Office c/o IUCN ESARO, 1st floor, Block E Hatfield Gardens, 333 Grosvenor Street, and address conservation P.O. Box 11536, Hatfield, Pretoria, 0028, South Africa Tel: (27) 12 342 8304/5; Fax: (27) 12 342 8289; E-mail: [email protected] challenges and solutions East Africa Office c/o WWF TCO, Plot 252 Kiko Street, Mikocheni, PO Box 105985, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 253 ▸ 1 November 2012 Reportersharing Stories of Imperial’S Community
    Issue 253 ▸ 1 November 2012 reporterSharing stories of Imperial’s community fringe benefits Visitors to the first Imperial Fringe take things to heart as they get to grips with our research → centre pages £35 MILLION FORWARD LONDON AWARD FOR THINKING BIKEATHON IMPERIAL Dr Simon Professor Dazzi HEFCE support Schultz on the on cycling 95 for Imperial value of looking miles with his West to the future patient PAGE 3 PAGE 7 PAGE 12 2 >> newsupdate www.imperial.ac.uk/reporter | reporter | 1 November 2012 • issue 253 Researchers unite to open up about animal research EDITOR’S CORNER Imperial has joined medical charities, remain high overall, with 66 per cent research funders, the pharmaceuti- of people supporting animal experi- cal industry and other universities mentation for medical research, Pregnant in signing a declaration for greater 40 per cent want to know more openness on animal research fol- before they form a firm opinion. pause lowing signs of a decrease in public Professor Maggie Dallman, “I hope this declaration will give s upport for animal research. Principal of the Faculty of Natural organisations and scientists the con- The results of a recent Ipsos Sciences, said: “Animal research fidence to speak out with the support As a number of you might Mori poll commissioned by the is a small but vital part of scientific of the wider research community.” know this is my final government reveal a 10 percentage and medical research in the UK. Ter- The declaration was signed by issue of Reporter before point decrease in public support for rorist activity by animal extremists in more than 40 research organisations, I go on maternity leave.
    [Show full text]
  • Concerted Action for the Common Guitarfish, Largetooth Sawfish And
    CONVENTION ON UNEP/CMS/COP13/Doc.28.2.8 MIGRATORY 24 September 2019 SPECIES Original: English 13th MEETING OF THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES Gandhinagar, India, 17 - 22 February 2020 Agenda Item 28.2 PROPOSAL FOR A CONCERTED ACTION FOR THE COMMON GUITARFISH (Rhinobatos rhinobatos) LISTED ON APPENDIX II OF THE CONVENTION, THE LARGETOOTH SAWFISH (Pristis pristis) LISTED ON APPENDIX I AND II OF THE CONVENTION AND THE SMALLTOOTH SAWFISH (Pristis pectinata) LISTED ON APPENDIX I and II OF THE CONVENTION* Summary: The Government of Gabon has submitted the attached proposal for a Concerted Action for the Common Guitarfish (Rhinobatos rhinobatos) the Largetooth Sawfish (Pristis pristis), and Smalltooth Sawfish (Pristis pectinata) in accordance with the process elaborated in Resolution 12.28. *The geographical designations employed in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the CMS Secretariat (or the United Nations Environment Programme) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The responsibility for the contents of the document rests exclusively with its author UNEP/CMS/COP13/Doc28.2.8 PROPOSAL FOR A CONCERTED ACTION FOR THE COMMON GUITARFISH (Rhinobatos rhinobatos) LISTED ON APPENDIX II OF THE CONVENTION, THE LARGETOOTH SAWFISH (Pristis pristis) LISTED ON APPENDIX I AND II OF THE CONVENTION AND THE SMALLTOOTH SAWFISH (Pristis pectinata) LISTED ON APPENDIX I and II OF THE CONVENTION* (i). Proponent: Government of Gabon Agence Nationale des Parcs Nationaux du Gabon - ANPN (National Parks Agency of Gabon) Contact: Aurelie Flore KOUMBA PAMBO, Conseiller Scientifique (ii).
    [Show full text]
  • Ghana Included in the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES)
    IDENTIFICATION GUIDE The Species of Ghana Included in the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) YEAR 2018 IDENTIFICATION GUIDE The CITES Species of Ghana Born Free USA thanks the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) for funding this guide and the Ghana authorities for their support. See the last section for a list of useful contacts, including the organizations displayed above. PHOTOS: MICHAEL HEYNS, BROCKEN INAGLORY, GEORGE CHERNILEVSKY, ALEX CHERNIKH, HANS HILLEWAERT, DAVID D’O, JAKOB FAHR TABLE OF CONTENTS How to use this guide ..........................................1 CHORDATA / ELASMOBRANCHII What is CITES? ..............................................3 / Carcharhiniformes ........................................101 What is the IUCN Red List? .....................................10 / Lamniformes .............................................101 How to read this guide ........................................13 / Orectolobiformes .........................................102 What the IUCN colors mean ....................................15 / Pristiformes ..............................................103 Steps for CITES permits .......................................17 Presentation of shark and ray species listed in CITES in West Africa ........19 CHORDATA / ACTINOPTERI / Syngnathiformes ..........................................103 CHORDATA / MAMMALIA / Artiodactyla ..............................................51 ARTHROPODA / ARACHNIDA / Carnivora ................................................53
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT Director’S Message
    2017 ANNUAL REPORT Director’s Message Amanda in Howe Sound, British Columbia, Canada. Photo by Amanda Vincent/ Dear friends Project Seahorse I am so pleased to share some of the Project Seahorse findings and doings from 2017. It was a rich and full year, not least because I was on sabbatical from my UBC professorial post from September to December. That meant I could spend time on field visits and policy development, both of which I love. It also meant I had time and opportunity to refl ect on marine conservation in general and on our Project Seahorse work in particular. Allow me to share a few of those experiences and thoughts. Six weeks in India, the majority of it surveying bottom trawl landing sites with Tanvi Vaidyanathan, hugely supported Project Seahorse’s decision to throw a lot of time and eff ort at ending this absurdly wasteful method of extracting marine life. It’s time to target our take and stop trawling. Five weeks in southern Chile and Argentina allowed me to wallow in marine wildlife and help support the most southerly populations of seahorses in the new world. It was clear from working with Diego Luzzatto (IUCN SSC Specialist Group member) that the Project Seahorse combination of a research and management feedback loop would serve the Patagonian seahorses very well. Five weeks in China gave me hope that the country might be mobilizing for marine conservation. Xiong Zhang and I spent time encouraging better enforcement of new laws directed at phasing out bottom trawling, planning the establishment of MPAs and training young colleagues who will fight for the ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Revision of the Seahorses Hippocampus Rafinesque 1810 (Actinopterygii: Syngnathiformes): Taxonomy and Biogeography with Recommendations for Further Research
    Zootaxa 4146 (1): 001–066 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2016 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4146.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:35E0DECB-20CE-4295-AE8E-CB3CAB226C70 ZOOTAXA 4146 A global revision of the Seahorses Hippocampus Rafinesque 1810 (Actinopterygii: Syngnathiformes): Taxonomy and biogeography with recommendations for further research SARA A. LOURIE1,2, RILEY A. POLLOM1 & SARAH J. FOSTER1, 3 1Project Seahorse, Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, The University of British Columbia, 2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada 2Redpath Museum, 859 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2K6, Canada 3Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by E. Hilton: 2 Jun. 2016; published: 29 Jul. 2016 SARA A. LOURIE, RILEY A. POLLOM & SARAH J. FOSTER A global revision of the Seahorses Hippocampus Rafinesque 1810 (Actinopterygii: Syngnathiformes): Taxonomy and biogeography with recommendations for further research (Zootaxa 4146) 66 pp.; 30 cm. 1 Aug. 2016 ISBN 978-1-77557-509-2 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-77557-534-4 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2016 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/j/zt © 2016 Magnolia Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated, in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from the publisher, to whom all requests to reproduce copyright material should be directed in writing.
    [Show full text]
  • Eighteenth Meeting of the Conference of the Parties Colombo, Sri Lanka, May 23-June 3
    CoP18 Prop. xx CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA ____________________ Eighteenth Meeting of the Conference of the Parties Colombo, Sri Lanka, May 23-June 3 CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS FOR AMENDMENT OF APPENDICES I AND II A. Proposal Inclusion of the two species commonly referred to as the white-spotted wedgefish, Rhynchobatus australiae and Rhynchobatus djiddensis, in Appendix II in accordance with Article II paragraph 2(a) of the Convention and satisfying Criterion A and B in Annex 2a of Resolution Conf. 9.24 (Rev. CoP17). Inclusion of all other species in the Family Rhinidae (wedgefish): Rhynchobatus cooki, Rhynchobatus immaculatus, Rhynchobatus laevis, Rhynchobatus luebberti, Rhynchobatus palpebratus, Rhynchobatus springeri, Rhynchorhina mauritaniensis, Rhina ancylostoma, and any other putative species of Family Rhinidae in Appendix II in accordance with Article II paragraph 2(b) of the Convention and satisfying Criterion A in Annex 2b of Resolution Conf. 9.24 (Rev. CoP17). Qualifying Criteria (Conf. 9.24 Rev. CoP17) Annex 2a, Criterion A. It is known, or can be inferred or projected, that the regulation of trade in the species is necessary to avoid it becoming eligible for inclusion in Appendix I in the near future: Rapid recent declines in populations of Rhynchobatus australiae and Rhynchobatus djiddensis of 80% or more, meeting Appendix I listing criteria for marine species of low productivity, are already documented in some regions (e.g., Jabado et al. 2017; Jabado 2018). Using the precautionary approach where data is lacking, and given the global footprint of tangle and gill net fisheries, similar declines are likely throughout much of the species range.
    [Show full text]
  • Wedgefishes : Family Rhinidae
    9 WEDGEFISHES Family Rhinidae P.R. Last, W.T. White & B. Séret Wedgefishes are medium to large, shark-like rays (0.7–3.1 m TL as adults and weighing at least 227 kg) with a variably depressed trunk, weakly formed disc, and a head either thickened and broadly domed, or flattened wedge-shaped or rounded. Pectoral fins are triangular and join the body behind eye level. The nostrils are long and narrow, and usually lie oblique to a small horizontal mouth with rounded to oval teeth that lack distinct cusps. The anterior nasal flaps are poorly developed and do not form a nasal curtain. The spiracles are large with 0–3 skin folds along their hind margin. A robust tail is slightly longer than the disc, and has two upright dorsal fins (the first above the pelvic fins), and a well-developed bilobed caudal fin with a strongly concave posterior margin. Its pelvic fins are moderately sized, angular and are not divided into two lobes. The skin is covered with minute denticles and there is a variably developed series of thorns along the dorsal mid-line, and usually 2–3 short series on each shoulder. Dorsal surface mainly yellowish to greyish brown and white ventrally. Often with rows of white spots or ocelli, and often a black blotch on each pectoral fin (pectoral marking) that is variably surrounded by white spots (marking generally most obvious in young). The undersurface of the snout can have a blackish marking. The family now includes 10 valid species from 3 genera: Rhina, Rhynchobatus and Rhynchorhina.
    [Show full text]
  • International Trophy Hunting
    International Trophy Hunting March 20, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45615 SUMMARY R45615 International Trophy Hunting March 20, 2019 International trophy hunting is a multinational, multimillion-dollar industry practiced throughout the world. Trophy hunting is broadly defined as the killing of animals for recreation with the Pervaze A. Sheikh purpose of collecting trophies such as horns, antlers, skulls, skins, tusks, or teeth for display. The Specialist in Natural United States imports the most trophies of any country in the world. Congressional interest in Resources Policy trophy hunting is related to the recreational and ethical considerations of hunting and the potential consequences of hunting for conservation. For some, interest in trophy hunting centers on particular charismatic species, such as African lions, elephants, and rhinoceroses. Congress’s Lucas F. Bermejo Research Associate role in addressing international trophy hunting is limited, because hunting is regulated by laws of the range country (i.e., the country where the hunted species resides). However, Congress could address trophy hunting through actions such as regulating trophy imports into the United States or providing funding and technical expertise to conserve hunted species in range countries. International trophy hunting generates controversy because of its potential costs and benefits to conservation, ethical considerations, and its contribution to local economies in range states. Proponents of trophy hunting contend that the practice provides an estimated millions of dollars for the conservation of species in exchange for the hunting of a proportionally small number of individuals. Further, they argue that trophy hunting can create incentives for conserving habitat and ecosystems where hunted animals roam and, in some impoverished areas in range countries, can provide a means of income, employment, and community development.
    [Show full text]