Appendix F 431 18 JANUARY 2001 432

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix F 431 18 JANUARY 2001 432 Appendix F 431 18 JANUARY 2001 432 and quickest way in which we could remove some of the fear would be to make the single vaccine available to those parents who ask for it? The First Minister: A medical expert sitting on my right tells me that there is no spurious research. We should not dismiss research of such importance from Finland. If concern about the MMR vaccine is expressed throughout the country, people need reassurance. The Executive makes every effort to use science to confirm to people that the MMR vaccine is a safe method. It has also been claimed that there are links with Crohn’s disease and autism, but there is no robust scientific evidence to suggest that that is the case. It is also important to note that the single vaccines carry difficulties and health threats. I will write to Lloyd Quinan to give him a fair amount of background material on the triple vaccine as well as the single vaccine and to say what the Government is doing to reassure people in every public utterance. We want to meet the target of 95 per cent immunisation. We can all attempt to do that. Dr Richard Simpson (Ochil) (Lab): Does the First Minister agree that using terms such as “spurious” to describe the research paper from Measles, Mumps and Rubella Vaccine Finland, which involved 18 years of research and 4. Mr Lloyd Quinan (West of Scotland) (SNP): 2 million individuals, does not serve the case of To ask the First Minister what measures have those parents who have understandable concerns been taken in response to drops in recent years in about the increasing rates of autism? the uptake of the MMR triple vaccination. (S1F- Mr Quinan rose— 775) Dr Simpson: If there is no link between the The First Minister (Henry McLeish): I preface MMR vaccine and autism, there is a danger that my answer by saying that I was glad to see Lloyd those parents are going down a cul-de-sac and Quinan at the launch of the arts exhibition by the pursuing a wholly spurious cause, which may cross-party group on autistic spectrum disorder. It ultimately be damaging for them. is first class. It takes place in the Parliament and allows parliamentarians to participate on issues on The First Minister: I have suggested that which there should be consensus. advocacy of concern should always be put into perspective. There is a danger that the uptake of There are on-going public education measures immunisation will fall. That would not be good for by the Health Education Board for Scotland. The children or for the health of the country. chief medical officer has written to health professionals on several occasions reaffirming that On such issues, we have to build on facts. We expert advice remains that the measles, mumps can do that, and we can ensure that parents and rubella vaccine provides the best protection appreciate it and understand it. We must do as against those three potentially serious diseases, much as we can to reassure them. I take Richard and exhorting them to continue to encourage Simpson’s point entirely. parents to bring their children forward for immunisation. Mr Quinan: On behalf of the many parents and children who provided material for the exhibition, I thank the First Minister for being kind enough to open it for us last week. Does the First Minister agree that the current climate of concern, trepidation and fear that is being experienced by parents over the MMR vaccine is not helped by the introduction of spurious studies from Finland, and that the easiest 16 Appendix G 1081 8 FEBRUARY 2001 1082 why I welcome the MRC research on autism. The problem will not go away. Parents will not change their minds on the vaccine. I look forward The second concern, which is where we to the report of the Health and Community Care politicians come in, is about the efficacy of the Committee, which is likely to be both informative vaccination programme. We cannot just blindly and useful. However, at the end of the day, we will say that we think that something is right, so we will have to come to a decision. We should offer not listen to parents’ concerns. Parents have no parents the choice that they require and deserve. I choice at the moment. While I agree with much of hope that we can reach a point where we agree on what was said in the press release by the RCN, that. the BMA in Scotland and others, I take issue with the paragraph saying that “Parents should be encouraged to discuss any concerns 11:23 they have regarding the vaccination with their GP, practice Dr Richard Simpson (Ochil) (Lab): Some of nurse or health visitor who will be able to provide detailed what I was going to say has already been said, but information allowing the parent to make an informed I will emphasise some points. We have already choice.” had a member’s debate, initiated by Lloyd Quinan, What is the choice? It is MMR or no vaccination which raised many of the concerns about the at all. Is that a real choice? I am looking forward to MMR vaccine. I am sorry that I missed that our report setting out a range of options. The debate. single vaccine is not necessarily the panacea that Debating this motion when the Health and some people believe—it is untested, untried and Community Care Committee is on the point of brings problems of its own. I will wait until our receiving its report is almost a discourtesy to the report comes out before taking a final position on Parliament because it bounces us into making the matter. It is a complex issue and one to which decisions. I will vote against the motion, although I Parliament must return when we have a little more will keep an open mind on the Health and than three minutes each in which to discuss it. Community Care Committee report. I look forward The Deputy Presiding Officer (Mr George to discussing the issue once I have been able to Reid): We move to the open debate. Members consider all the evidence. I say that as someone have no more than three minutes each. who has read much of the evidence and many of the studies. 11:20 The first challenge to the vaccine is that it is not Shona Robison (North-East Scotland) (SNP): safe. Dr Wakefield recently attacked the vaccine Tommy Sheridan opened the debate by saying as unsafe and suggested that it had been that he does not know whether there is a causal inappropriately licensed. That is invalid for two link between MMR and autism—that goes for most reasons. First, as Malcolm Chisholm mentioned, members, if not all. However, we know that there the number of doses that has been used across are parental fears. We have all met parents who the world demonstrates that there are no real have real concerns. No matter how many safety fears. Secondly, there are the results of the reassurances are given by the Government, the initial Finnish twin study, published in 1986, which BMA or anyone else, a sizeable minority of met the strictest scientific criteria. The study was parents will decide not to give their children the unique and classical—it was a placebo-controlled, MMR vaccine. double-blind twin study and demonstrated the vaccine to be safe. We must accept that over the years there has been growing public scepticism about Government Not only is the vaccine safe, evidence published reassurances. Rightly or wrongly, people no last year by the Finns in the Journal of the longer accept everything that the Government or American Medical Association demonstrated the medical profession says. What can we do? We positive benefits. The Finns were also considering must accept that the result is that some parents another theory, which is held there and which was will choose not to vaccinate their children. That is suggested here by a doctor—I am sorry to say—in the worst possible outcome and puts children in an article in the Daily Record not so long ago: that real danger. Margaret Smith made an important measles is not that bad because it somehow helps point. The BMA press release talks about the immune system. That is complete and utter “informed choice”, yet people are being offered no rubbish. The Finnish study shows that the levels of choice. What is the choice? It is our responsibility asthma, eczema and allergic rhinitis in children to take a pragmatic approach to the matter. In who receive MMR is reduced by between 32 and those cases where parents are refusing MMR, we 67 per cent when compared with those who have should consider offering a single vaccine— had measles. That was a substantial study measles in the first instance, followed by mumps showing that the MMR triple vaccine has benefited and rubella after the required period. the prevention of those diseases. I hope that we will be able to demonstrate that in Scotland, too. 17 Appendix G 1083 8 FEBRUARY 2001 1084 There is no doubt that the individual measles in the country expressing concern and telling me vaccine was an effective vaccine. However, the that there is a network of people who have level of measles in Scotland did not drop until the decided, because of their fear, not to take up the introduction of the triple vaccine. It was not until MMR vaccine.
Recommended publications
  • Scottish Parliament Report
    European Committee 3rd Report, 2002 Report on the Inquiry into the Future of Cohesion Policy and Structural Funds post 2006 SP Paper 618 £13.30 Session 1 (2002) Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2002. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Copyright Unit, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by The Stationery Office Ltd. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office is independent of and separate from the company now trading as The Stationery Office Ltd, which is responsible for printing and publishing Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body publications. European Committee 3rd Report, 2002 Report on the Inquiry into the Future of Cohesion Policy and Structural Funds post 2006 European Committee Remit and membership Remit: 1. The remit of the European Committee is to consider and report on- (a) proposals for European Communities legislation; (b) the implementation of European Communities legislation; and (c) any European Communities or European Union issue. 2. The Committee may refer matters to the Parliamentary Bureau or other committees where it considers it appropriate to do so. 3. The convener of the Committee shall not be the convener of any other committee whose remit is, in the opinion of the Parliamentary Bureau, relevant to that of the Committee. 4. The Parliamentary Bureau shall normally propose a person to be a member of the Committee only if he or she is a member of another committee whose remit is, in the opinion of the Parliamentary Bureau, relevant to that of the Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Spice Briefing
    MSPs BY CONSTITUENCY AND REGION Scottish SESSION 1 Parliament This Fact Sheet provides a list of all Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) who served during the first parliamentary session, Fact sheet 12 May 1999-31 March 2003, arranged alphabetically by the constituency or region that they represented. Each person in Scotland is represented by 8 MSPs – 1 constituency MSPs: Historical MSP and 7 regional MSPs. A region is a larger area which covers a Series number of constituencies. 30 March 2007 This Fact Sheet is divided into 2 parts. The first section, ‘MSPs by constituency’, lists the Scottish Parliament constituencies in alphabetical order with the MSP’s name, the party the MSP was elected to represent and the corresponding region. The second section, ‘MSPs by region’, lists the 8 political regions of Scotland in alphabetical order. It includes the name and party of the MSPs elected to represent each region. Abbreviations used: Con Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party Green Scottish Green Party Lab Scottish Labour LD Scottish Liberal Democrats SNP Scottish National Party SSP Scottish Socialist Party 1 MSPs BY CONSTITUENCY: SESSION 1 Constituency MSP Region Aberdeen Central Lewis Macdonald (Lab) North East Scotland Aberdeen North Elaine Thomson (Lab) North East Scotland Aberdeen South Nicol Stephen (LD) North East Scotland Airdrie and Shotts Karen Whitefield (Lab) Central Scotland Angus Andrew Welsh (SNP) North East Scotland Argyll and Bute George Lyon (LD) Highlands & Islands Ayr John Scott (Con)1 South of Scotland Ayr Ian
    [Show full text]
  • Msps Not Standing Or Not Returned in the 2003
    SESSION 1 MSPS NOT STANDING OR NOT Scottish RETURNED IN THE 2003 ELECTION Parliament Fact sheet A number of MSPs did not return to the Scottish Parliament in Session 2. They either did not stand for re-election or they stood as a candidate but were not re-elected. MSPs: Historical This fact sheets is divided into two sections. The first section lists Series those MSPs who stood for re-election but failed to win a seat. The second section lists those MSPs who were serving at the end of the 25 October 2005 first parliamentary session (31 March 2003) but chose not to stand for re-election. Abbreviations used: Con Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party Ind Independent Lab Scottish Labour LD Scottish Liberal Democrats SNP Scottish National Party 1 MSPs that stood for re-election but failed to win a seat Brian Fitzpatrick Lab Strathkelvin & Bearsden Kenny Gibson SNP Glasgow Rhoda Grant Lab Highlands & Islands Iain Gray Lab Edinburgh Pentlands Keith Harding Con Mid Scotland & Fife John McAllion Lab Dundee East Irene McGugan SNP North East Scotland Lyndsay McIntosh Con Central Scotland Angus Mackay Lab Edinburgh South Fiona McLeod SNP West of Scotland Gil Paterson SNP Central Scotland Lloyd Quinan SNP West of Scotland Michael Russell SNP South of Scotland Dr Richard Simpson Lab Ochil Elaine Thomson Lab Aberdeen North Andrew Wilson SNP Central Scotland MSPs that did not stand for re-election Name Party Constituency or Region Colin Campbell SNP West of Scotland Dorothy-Grace Elder Ind Glasgow Dr Winnie Ewing SNP Highlands & Islands Duncan Hamilton SNP Highlands & Islands Ian Jenkins LD Tweeddale, Ettrick & Lauderdale Rt Hon Henry McLeish Lab Central Fife Rt Hon Sir David Steel KBE LD Lothians Kay Ullrich SNP West of Scotland Ben Wallace Con North East Scotland John Young OBE Con West of Scotland Scottish Parliament Fact sheet 2 Contacting the Public Information Service For more information you can visit our website at http://www.scottish.parliament.uk or contact the Public Information Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting of the Parliament
    MEETING OF THE PARLIAMENT Thursday 23 March 2000 Volume 5 No 10 £5.00 Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2000. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Copyright Unit, Her Majesty‘s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by The Stationery Office Ltd. Her Majesty‘s Stationery Office is independent of and separate from the company now trading as The Stationery Office Ltd, which is responsible for printing and publishing Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body publications. CONTENTS Thursday 23 March 2000 Debates Col. INFRASTRUCTURE (PUBLIC INVESTMENT) ........................................................................................................... 881 Motion—[Fiona Hyslop]—moved. Amendment—[Ms Alexander]—moved. Amendment—[Miss Goldie]—moved. Fiona Hyslop (Lothians) (SNP) .................................................................................................................... 881 The Minister for Communities (Ms Wendy Alexander) ................................................................................ 888 Miss Annabel Goldie (West of Scotland) (Con) ........................................................................................... 893 Mr Keith Raffan (Mid Scotland and Fife) (LD) ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download (14MB)
    https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ Theses Digitisation: https://www.gla.ac.uk/myglasgow/research/enlighten/theses/digitisation/ This is a digitised version of the original print thesis. Copyright and moral rights for this work are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This work cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Enlighten: Theses https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] Politics, Pleasures and the Popular Imagination: Aspects of Scottish Political Theatre, 1979-1990. Thomas J. Maguire Thesis sumitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the Department of Theatre, Film and Television Studies, Glasgow University. © Thomas J. Maguire ProQuest Number: 10992141 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10992141 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • Cera: Lcaguc <Gg
    No. 133 Spring / Summer 2006 €4.00 Stg. £3.00 • Super Casino Threat in Scotland • Diwan - Partners of Breizh Council • Jailed for Welsh Language • Irish Language News • Stannary Appeal to Europe • Newodhow • Jamys y Cowle R.I.P. • The Great Deception - Can the EU Survive? ' \ 0 \ i e , \ z L ) ALBA: AN COMANN CEILTEACH “ " w BREIZH: AR KEVRE KELTIEK CYMRU: YR UNDEB CELTAIDD ÉIRE: AN CONRADH CEILTEACH KERNOW: AN KESUNYANS KELTEK MANNIN: YN COMMEEYS CELTIAGH cera: lcaguc <gg Summary Scotland’s First Minister Jack McConnell has called for a debate on establishing an official national anthem for Scotland. This Alb a opinion was put forward during the Commonwealth Games which uses the cringe worthy Scotland the Brave as Scotland's anthem as opposed to Flower of Scotland which is used at football and rugby matches and is more widely recognised as the Deasbad air Oran Nàiseanta do dh’Alba national anthem. In addition to these options, several other songs have been suggested as Tha feum air deasbad air dé an t-óran possibilities. Alternatively a brand new náiseanta oifigeil a bu choir a bhith aig Alba anthem might be chosen. a réir a’ Phriomh Mhinistear, Seac MacConnail BPA. Nochd am beachd seo arms a’ Mháirt nuair a bha Geamaichean a’ Cho-fhlaitheis a’ dol air adhart arm an Astráilia. Ged a thathar a’ Gaelic Spellchecker launched cleachdadh Fliir na h-Alba mar oran náiseanta aig geamaichean rugbaidh is ball- A Gaelic spellchecker has been produced coise is tachartasan spórs eile mar as ábhaist, by the European Language Initaitive, the thathar a’ cleachdadh Scotland the Brave same team which created Faclair na mar oran náiseanta aig geamaichean a’ Cho- Parlamaid, the official Gaelic-English fhlaitheis.
    [Show full text]
  • SLR I24.Indd
    scottishleftreviewIssue 24 September/October 2004 Contents Comment ........................................................2 A new vision for a model parliament............12 John McAllion Feedback.........................................................4 Profit and Parliament ...................................14 Briefing ...........................................................5 David Miller Was this the settled will?................................6 Afraid of the bathroom mirror......................16 Derrick Whyte Susan Deacon New parliament, new view .............................8 Opposing but not imposing...........................18 Jim and Margaret Cuthbert Rob Gibson Silence built in ..............................................10 The ideas leaders..........................................20 Chris Thomson Lorna Bett The only mistake here is to believe that these diagnoses are Comment somehow unlinked or even mutually exclusive. In fact, these things are all true and all contribute to and feed off each other. f you stop and think about it, it makes no sense that a minute But why should this have happened? A suspicious Parliament Ibefore midnight on a friend’s birthday we studiously don’t cry has been created and this is in part because of the problem happy birthday; we do this because if we didn’t choose arbitrary of proximity. If you remove the Tories from the equation the moments to stop and take stock then we probably wouldn’t stop political parties in Scotland form an almost seamless strand to take stock at all. So it may be nothing more than a moving of political positions which moves across a comparatively of the furniture but the move to the Scottish Parliament’s new compact area of land between the left and the centre left. So Holyrood building feels like it could have the potential to be in a context in which the political parties think they have no some sort of fresh start.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 3 Crime and Punishment Devolution Travel
    The Best of 25 Years of the Scottish Review Issue 3 Crime and Punishment Devolution Travel Edited by Islay McLeod ICS Books To Kenneth Roy, founder of the Scottish Review, mentor and friend, and to all the other contributors who are no longer with us. First published by ICS Books 216 Liberator House Prestwick Airport Prestwick KA9 2PT © Institute of Contemporary Scotland 2020 Cover design: James Hutcheson All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form, or by any means without the prior permission of the publisher. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978-1-8382831-2-4 Contents Crime and Punishment 1 Dancing with a stranger Magnus Linklater (1996) 2 Insider George Chalmers (1999) 11 Alice's year Fiona MacDonald (1999) 16 Anne Frank and the prisoners Paula Cowan (2009) 23 She took her last breath handcuffed to a guard Kenneth Roy (2013) 26 The last man to be hanged in Scotland returns to haunt us Kenneth Roy (2014) 29 Inside the Vale Prisoner 65595 (2016) 32 The truth about knife crime Kenneth Roy (2016) 36 Crack central Maxwell MacLeod (2016) 39 Rape, and the men who get away with it Kenneth Roy (2017) 42 Polmont boys Kenneth Roy (2017) 44 Spouses who kill Kenneth Roy (2018) 47 Still banging them up Kenneth Roy (2018) 50 The death in prison of Katie Allan Kenneth Roy (2018) 53 Fear and loathing in the gym Kenneth Roy (2018) 55 In defence of 'not proven' verdicts Alistair R
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Parliament Elections
    RESEARCH PAPER 99/50 Scottish Parliament 8 SEPTEMBER 1999 Elections: 6 May 1999 This paper presents a summary of the results of the first elections to the Scottish Parliament which took place on 6 May 1999. The paper gives information on voting patterns and turnout for Scotland as a whole and for constituencies and electoral regions. This revised edition of the paper includes figures on second votes by constituency. The data used are taken from returns made by returning officers rather than press reports. Readers may also be interested in Research Paper 99/51 which covers the elections to the Welsh Assembly and Research Paper 99/52 which looks at the local elections in Great Britain. Bryn Morgan SOCIAL AND GENERAL STATISTICS SECTION HOUSE OF COMMONS LIBRARY Recent Library Research Papers include: 99/35 The Control of High Hedges 25.03.99 99/36 The Right to Buy 30.03.99 99/37 Economic Indicators 01.04.99 99/38 Genetically Modified Crops and Food 31.03.99 99/39 The Health Bill [HL] [Bill 77 of 1998-99] 08.04.99 99/40 The Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Bill [HL] [Bill 74 of 1998-99] 14.04.99 99/41 The Football (Offences and Disorder) Bill [Bill 17 of 1998-99] 14.04.99 99/42 The Road Haulage Industry: costs and taxes 19.04.99 99/43 Disability Rights Commission Bill [HL] [Bill 73 of 1998-99] 20.04.99 99/44 Unemployment by Constituency - March 1999 21.04.99 99/45 Adoption (Intercountry Aspects) Bill [Bill 18 of 1998-99] 22.04.99 99/46 Local Elections - Proposals for Reform 28.04.99 99/47 Economic Indicators 04.05.99 99/48 Kosovo: Operation "Allied Force" 29.04.99 99/49 The Northern Ireland (Location of Victims' Remains) Bill 07.05.99 [Bill 92 of 1998-99] Research Papers are available as PDF files: • to members of the general public on the Parliamentary web site, URL: http://www.parliament.uk • within Parliament to users of the Parliamentary Intranet, URL: http://hcl1.hclibrary.parliament.uk Library Research Papers are compiled for the benefit of Members of Parliament and their personal staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Europe Matters Issue 6 Dec-00
    Europe Matters Issue 6 Dec-00 Welcome Editorial Welcome to the 6th issue of Europe Matters – the electronic newsletter of the Scottish Parliament’s European Committee. Since I last wrote, the Committee has been extremely busy. As well as carrying out our usual role of carefully scrutinising European documentation, we have among other things: • Produced reports on subjects as diverse as Structural Funds, Scottish Aquaculture and Football Transfers • Met Commissioners Franz Fischler, Michel Barnier and Anna Diamantopoulou on their visits to Scotland • Met the Ambassadors of Sweden and Germany • Forged links with the Committees responsible for European issues in Westminster, Wales and Northern Ireland • Attended the inaugural meeting of the Scottish Executive’s European Structural Funds Forum • Began laying the groundwork for two major Committee Inquiries. Firstly on the reform of the Common Fisheries Policy and secondly on what the EU means to the people of Scotland • Called for evidence on the issue of Structural Funds applications There have also been changes in the make up of the Committee. We say goodbye to Allan Wilson and Tavish Scott - who have been promoted to positions in the Scottish Executive. Also, Bruce Crawford, who will now be the SNP’s Transport Spokesperson and Dr Winnie Ewing who is taking up a position on the important Public Petitions Committee. I thank them for all their hard work on the committee and wish them well. As a consequence, we also welcome two new members from the SNP, Lloyd Quinan and Richard Lochhead. Finally, on behalf of the Committee and myself, have a merry Christmas and a happy New Year! Hugh Henry MSP All the news Funds, Football, Fish-farming - Committee issues 3 major reports We have recently published three major reports demonstrating the unique diversity of our remit.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. ProQuest Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 UMI UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE QUESTIONS TO THE HRST MINISTER OF SCOTLAND A Dissertation SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy BY JEFFERY J. GENTRY Norman, Oklahoma 2003 UMI Number: 3082962 UMI UMI Microform 3082962 Copyright 2003 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 © Copyright by Jeffery J.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Report to Be Forwarded to Them Should Give Notice at the Document Supply Centre
    EUROPEAN COMMITTEE Tuesday 26 March 2002 (Afternoon) Session 1 £5.00 Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2002. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Copyright Unit, Her Majesty‟s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by The Stationery Office Ltd. Her Majesty‟s Stationery Office is independent of and separate from the company now trading as The Stationery Office Ltd, which is responsible for printing and publishing Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body publications. CONTENTS Tuesday 26 March 2002 Col. ITEM IN PRIVATE .................................................................................................................................. 1405 EXECUTIVE BRIEFINGS ......................................................................................................................... 1406 WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE............................................................................................................ 1413 CONVENER’S REPORT .......................................................................................................................... 1416 EC/EU LEGISLATION (IMPLEMENTATION) ................................................................................................ 1420 SCRUTINY..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]