DOCSLIB.ORG

North America Offshore Wind

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
North America Offshore Wind Prince Rupert NaiKun (400 MW) NaiKun Wind Development Inc/ENMAX Sandspit NEWFOUNDLAND ALBER TA Saskatoon Bella Bella BRITISH COLUMBIA North America - Offshore Wind Projects Map 2020 MANITOBA SASKATCHEWAN AND LABRADOR Calgary NORTH AMERICA Port Hardy Offshore Wind Projects 2020 Compiled, Designed and Produced by La Tene Maps Kelowna ONTARIO Station House, Shankill, Dublin 18, Ireland. Tel: +353-12847914. e-mail: [email protected] www.latenemaps.com Vancouver Tofino Abbotsford Bellingham Thunder Bay St. Georges Bay (180MW) Atlantic Canada Offshore Developments (Beothuk Energy, CIP) Seattle NORTH DAKOTA WASHINGTON Spokane The Superior Array (650 MW) United States - East Coast OFFSHORE Trillium Power Wind Corporation CANADA Tacoma WIND FARM ALBERTA Aberdeen BRITISH AREAS COLUMBIA SASKATCHEWAN MANITOBA QUEBEC CITY LABRADOR QUEBEC MONTANA Duluth Lake Superior CANADA ONTARIO Sault Ste. Marie QUEBEC Sudbury PRINCE EDWARD NEWFOUNDLAND NORTH DAKOTA Trois-Rivieres MINNESOTA WASHINGTON ISLAND MONTANA MINNESOTA Lake Superior NEW NEW PEI BRUNSWICK Lake Huron NOVA MAINE WISCONSIN SCOTIA Astoria SOUTH DAKOTA VERMONT BRUNSWICK OREGON IDAHO WYOMING NH Lake Ontario MICHIGAN Fredericton IOWA NEW YORK MA Lake Erie NEBRASKA CT RI PENNSYLVANIA NEVADA INDIANA OHIO ILLINOIS USA NJ UTAH MARYLAND Vancouver WEST KANSAS VIRGINIA COLORADO DE Montreal MISSOURI KENTUCKY VIRGINIA Tillamook Sherbrooke Portland TENNESSEE NORTH CALIFORNIA ARKANSAS Ottawa OKLAHOMA CAROLINA Lake Huron ARIZONA NEW MEXICO SOUTH CAROLINA ONTARIO Kauai Hawaii MISSISSIPPI BERMUDAS Oahu ALABAMA GEORGIA Honolulu Minneapolis Molakai TEXAS Lanai Maui LOUISIANA FLORIDA Hawaii SOUTH DAKOTA In February 2011 the government of Ontario NOVA placed a moratorium on all off-shore wind projects. MAINE MEXICO NASSAU BAHAMAS SCOTIA HAVANA Barrie VERMONT CUBA Green Bay AUGUSTA WISCONSINMEXICO CITY HAITI SANTO DOMINGO Wolf Island Shoals (300 MW) IDAHO PORT-AU-PRINCE SAN JUAN MICHIGAN Eugene CANADA KINGSTON Windstream Energy Inc. MONTPELIER OREGON Prince Rupert TORONTO Trillium Power Wind 1 (480+ MW) NaiKun-Haida (400 MW) Trillium Wind Power Corp. Northland Power Inc EDMONTON Sheboygan Bay City NEW Monhegan Is Test Site. Yarmouth (180MW) Sandspit Sioux Falls Portland UMaine Atlantic Canada Offshore Developments Kitchener Lake Ontario HAMPSHIRE New England Aqua Ventus 1 (12WW, 2) (Beothuk Energy, CIP) WYOMING Saginaw Maine Aqua Ventus Syracuse LABRADOR Niagara Falls Rochester Hamilton Portsmouth ALBER TA Saskatoon Milwaukee Muskegon Bella Bella Flint London St. Catharines Grand Rapids Manchester BRITISH Port Huron Samia COLUMBIA MANITOBA Holland SASKATCHEWAN Buffalo NEW YORK Newburyport Humboldt - California Lake Michigan Lowell Calgary Orick ALBANY Detroit Salem Results of Call Port Hardy IOWA MA REGINA For nominated areas for Wind Leases Rockford Ann Arbor Springfield Worcester BOSTON Benton Harbor Lake Erie WINNIPEG Cedar Rapids Evanston Kelowna ONTARIO Evanston Monroe Erie PROVIDENCE Vancouver Chicago Aurora HARTFORD NEBRASKA Davenport QUEBEC New Bedford State Wind Development Areas Tofino Toledo Icebreaker (20.7 MW, 6) Abbotsford South Bend RI A. Gosnold Wind Energy Area Icebreaker Wind Power (LEEDCO & Fred Olsen) Newport B. Martha’s Vinyard Wind Energy Area Bellingham Cleveland CT A C. Block Island MacKinleyville Joliet New London VICTORIA Thunder Bay NEWFOUNDLAND Sandusky 1b St. Georges Bay (180MW) Rhode Island and Massachusetts North/South Area (1200 MW) Omaha Atlantic Canada Offshore Developments B (Beothuk Energy/Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners) Fort Wayne Block Island (30 MW) Ørsted 1 1. Lease OCS-A 0486 - Ørsted (Deepwater Wind) C 1 1a 1a. South Fork Project (130MW, 16) Ørsted Akron 2 1b. Revolution Wind (704MW, 88) Ørsted 2 a 4a 2. Lease OCS-A 0487 - Ørsted (Deepwater Wind) Seattle NORTH DAKOTA ST. JOHN’S Paterson Spokane PENNSYLVANIA 3 2a. Sunrise Wind (880MW, 110) Ørsted (Deepwater Wind) Arcata WASHINGTON 4b New York 6a Eureka Tacoma Peoria 5 Massachusetts Lease Area Aberdeen Newark 7 QUEBEC CITY 6b 3. Bay State Wind (800+ MW), Ørsted/Eversource Energy - Lease OCS-A 0500 OLYMPIA Fort Collins BISMARCK Allentown Fairways North Eureka MONTANA Duluth Lake Superior 4a. Vinyard Wind (800 MW), (CIP/Avangrid) - Lease OCS-A 0501 Pittsburgh WEA 4b. Park City Wind (800 MW), (CIP/Avangrid) - Lease OCS-A 0501 HELENA Sault Ste. Marie PRINCE EDWARD Fairways South WEA Sudbury INDIANA ISLAND OHIO 5. Equinor - Lease OCS-A 0520 Trois-Rivieres MINNESOTA NEW BRUNSWICK HARRISBURG Long Island or New York Area 6a. Mayflower Wind (800MW), EDPR/Shell- Lease OCS-A 0521 Redwood Coast Energy Authority 6b. Mayflower Wind II (800MW), Shell/EDPR - Lease OCS-A 0521 Astoria 1 2 Hudson North Equinor - Lease OCS-A 0512 Provo Fredericton 7. Liberty Wind (1200MW), (CIP/Avangrid) - Lease OCS-A 0522 WEA 1. Empire Wind (1000MW, 60+) Mainstream Renewable Power Inc TRENTON Vancouver ILLINOIS 2. Broadwalk Wind (1000MW, 60+) Montreal Philadelphia Note on NY Bight Call Tillamook Portland Sherbrooke Algonquin Power Fund (America Inc) Lake Huron Ottawa (Fairways North & South and Hudson North & South) MAINE NJ The companies listed below made nominations In February 2011 the government of Ontario Avangrid Renewables LLC Minneapolis SALEM placed a moratorium on all off-shore wind projects. Avangrid Renewables LLC Cierco Corporation HALIFAX EC&R (E.on) Renewanles Development LLC SOUTH DAKOTA SAINT PAUL Dayton East Wind LLC Equinor Wind US LLC VERMONT EDf Renewables Reno Northcoast Floating Wind LLC Barrie Hudson South WEA Horizon Wind Power PIERRE Green Bay Kingston AUGUSTA NOVA SCOTIA Northland Power America LLC IDAHO WISCONSIN MICHIGAN Wolf Island Shoals (300 MW) Innogy US Renewable Projects wpd Offshore Alpha Humboltd Eugene OREGON Windstream Energy Inc. MONTPELIER MARYLAND Atlantic City PNE Wind USA Inc. Trillium Power Wind 1 (480 MW) 1 US Wind Inc UTAH Sheboygan TORONTO Trillium Wind Power Corp. NEW Baltimore BOISE Bay City It has been reported that a sale process will progress in 2020 Sioux Falls HAMPSHIRE Portland Kitchener Lake Ontario Monhegan Is. Test Site. Cincinnati Saginaw DOVER New Jersey Lease Area Morro Bay & Diablo Canyon WYOMING Kansas City University of Maine 2 CONCORD Yarmouth (180MW) Independence Hamilton Niagara Falls Syracuse New England Aqua Ventus 1 (12WW, 2) 1. Atlantic Shores (1200MW+), EDF/Shell - New Jersey North Lease Area OCS-A 0499 North Rochester Portsmouth Muskegon St. Catharines Maine Aqua Ventus Atlantic Canada Offshore Developments 2a MADISON Milwaukee Flint London WEST WASHINGTON, D.C. 2. Ocean Wind (1100MW, 90), Ørsted - New Jersey South Lease Area OCS-A 0498 South Grand Rapids (Beothuk Energy/Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners) Morro Bay Colorado Springs Port Huron Samia Manchester Holland LANSING ANNAPOLIS Cape May 2a. Ocean Wind II (850MW), Ørsted - New Jersey South Lease Area OCS-A 0498 South Results of Call Buffalo NEW YORK Newburyport Lake Michigan Lowell State Wind Development Areas Delaware Lease Area North Mainstream Renewable Power Inc ALBANY DE Detroit MA Salem A. Gosnold Wind Energy Area VIRGINIA Alexandria Garden State Offshore Energy (680MW), Ørsted - Lease OCS-A 0482 (450 MW) For nominated areas COLORADO KANSAS IOWA B. Martha’s Vinyard Wind Energy Area Avangrid Renewables LLC UNITED STATES Rockford Ann Arbor St. Louis Springfield Worcester BOSTON C. Block Island Delaware Lease Area South Santa Rosa Lake Erie Castle Wind LLC Cedar Rapids Evanston Benton Harbor Evanston Monroe Erie Skipjack (120MW, 10), Ørsted - Lease OCS-A 0519 Cierco Corporation Icebreaker (20.7 MW, 6) Rhode Island and Massachusetts North/South Area (1200 MW) for Wind Leases Chicago PROVIDENCE EC&R (E.on) Renewanles Development LLC Aurora Icebreaker Wind Power 1. Lease OCS-A 0486 - Ørsted (Deepwater Wind) NEBRASKA Davenport Toledo HARTFORD New Bedford 2 Maryland Lease Area EDF Renewables Development Inc. Pueblo DES MOINES (LEEDCO & Freed Olsen) 1a. South Fork Project (130MW, 16) Ørsted 1 South Bend Cleveland Newport EDP Renewables (EDPR) North America LLC New London RI 1b. Revolution Wind (704MW, 88) Ørsted Ocean City 2 MarWin I+II (986 MW), US Wind Inc. - OCS-A 0490 Joliet A Louisville CHEYENNE Sandusky 2. Lease OCS-A 0487 - Ørsted (Deepwater Wind) Equinor Wind US LLC Omaha PENNSYLVANIA B C 1 Fort Wayne Block Island (30 MW,5) Ørsted 1 Mission Floating Wind US LLC 1a 2a. Sunrise Wind (880MW, 110) Ørsted (Deepwater Wind) Vallejo Akron 2 Northland Power America LLC Paterson Evansville2 a 4a NEVADA 3 4b wpd Offshore Alpha Morro Bay New York 5 Massachusetts Lease Area Eureka Peoria 6a Lexington CALIFORNIA SALT LAKE CITY Newark 6b 7 3. Bay State Wind (800+ MW), Ørsted/Eversource Energy - Lease OCS-A 0500 Humboldt Fort Collins LINCOLN Fairways North OF AMERICA Allentown NJ 4a. Vinyard Wind (800 MW), (CIP/Avangrid) - Lease OCS-A 0501 Call Area for information and nominations INDIANA OHIO Pittsburgh HARRISBURG Fairways South 1 4b. Park City Wind (800 MW), (CIP/Avangrid) - Lease OCS-A 0501 The following companies made nominations Provo 2 Long Island or New York Area Algonquin Power Fund (America Inc) 5. Equinor - Lease OCS-A 0520 Wichita ILLINOIS Hudson Nth Equinor - Lease OCS-A 0512 6a. Mayflower Wind (800MW), EDPR/Shell- Lease OCS-A 0521 VIRGINIA Modesto wpd Offshore AlphaHumboltd Philadelphia 1. Empire Wind (1000MW, 60+) San Francisco Avangrid Renewables LLC COLUMBUS 2. Broadwalk Wind (1000MW, 60+) 6b. Mayflower Wind II (800MW), Shell/EDPR - Lease OCS-A 0521 DENVER INDIANAPOLIS 7. Liberty Wind (1200MW), (CIP/Avangrid) - Lease OCS-A 0522 RICHMOND Cierco Corporation SPRINGFIELD Dayton EC&R (E.on) Renewanles Development
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Meridian Wind Project Hyde County, South Dakota Application to The
    Meridian Wind Project Hyde County, South Dakota Application to the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission for a Facility Permit April 23, 2020 MERIDIAN WIND PROJECT, LLC 3760 State Street, Suite 200 Santa Barbara, CA 93105 Applicant: Meridian Wind Project, LLC Address: 3760 State Street, Suite 200 Santa Barbara, CA 93105 Authorized Representative: Casey Willis, Senior Advisor, Project Development Signature: Phone: 805-569-6185 Email: [email protected] Application for Facility Permit Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Project Overview .............................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Names of Participants (Administrative Rules of South Dakota [ARSD] 20:10:22:06) ...................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Name of Owner and Manager (ARSD 20:10:22:07) ........................................ 1-2 1.4 Facility Permit Application Content and Organization .................................... 1-2 1.4.1 Completeness ChecK ........................................................................ 1-3 2.0 PURPOSE OF, AND DEMAND FOR, THE WIND ENERGY FACILITY (ARSD 20:10:22:08, 20:10:22:10) ............................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Renewable Power Demand ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Offshore Wind Power Economic Impact Assessment
    U.S. Offshore Wind Power Economic Impact Assessment Issue Date | March 2020 Prepared By American Wind Energy Association Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Current Status of U.S. Offshore Wind .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Lessons from Land-based Wind ...................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Announced Investments in Domestic Infrastructure ............................................................................................................................ 5 Methodology ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Input Assumptions ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Modeling Tool ........................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Monitoring and Mitigation Policies and Practices at Offshore Wind Installations in the United States and Europe
    Ecological Monitoring and Mitigation Policies and Practices at Offshore Wind Installations in the United States and Europe August 2020 Michael C. Allen, Ph.D., Postdoctoral Research Associate, Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, Matthew Campo, Senior Research Specialist, Environmental Analysis & Communications Group, Rutgers University Prepared for the New Jersey Climate Change Alliance (https://njadapt.rutgers.edu/). Working Group Members: John Cecil, New Jersey Audubon Tim Dillingham, American Littoral Society Patty Doerr, The Nature Conservancy of New Jersey Russell Furnari, PSEG Kevin Hassell, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Anthony MacDonald, Urban Coast Institute at Monmouth University Martha Maxwell-Doyle, Barnegat Bay Partnership David Mizrahi, Ph.D., New Jersey Audubon Technical Reviews and Acknowledgments Joseph Brodie, Ph.D. Jeanne Herb Marjorie Kaplan, Dr.P.H. Josh Kohut, Ph.D. Richard Lathrop, Ph.D. Julie Lockwood, Ph.D. Douglas Zemeckis, Ph.D. https://doi.org/doi:10.7282/t3-wn1p-cz80 1 ABSTRACT Offshore wind energy is poised to expand dramatically along the eastern United States. However, the promise of sustainable energy also brings potential impacts on marine ecosystems from new turbines and transmission infrastructure. This whitepaper informs government officials, scientists, and stakeholders in New Jersey about the current policies and monitoring methods other jurisdictions use to monitor potential ecological impacts from offshore wind installations. We reviewed policy documents in the eastern U.S. and Europe, reviewed the scientific literature, and conducted stakeholder interviews in Spring 2020. We found: 1. Short-term (3-5 year) project-specific efforts dominate coordinated regional and project life duration ecological monitoring efforts at offshore wind farms in North America and Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Wind Summit September 25, 30, and October 7
    Offshore Wind Summit September 25, 30, and October 7, 2020 National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & The Embassy of Denmark 1 Introductory Remarks Jessica Rackley, Energy & Environment Program Director, NGA Center for Best Practices Michael Guldbrandtsen, Counselor, Embassy of Denmark Thank You to our Sponsors States with Clean Energy Goals Source: NGA, 2020 Offshore Wind Technical Potential Source: NREL, 2016 Offshore Wind Energy Resource Assessment for the United States Today’s Virtual Meeting: Zoom Controls The Zoom menu bar appears at the If you don’t see the menu bar, move your bottom of the Zoom window once the meeting begins. mouse slightly and the bar will appear. Chat your questions Introductory Remarks Michael Guldbrandtsen Counselor Embassy of Denmark Welcome Remarks Tim Blute Director NGA Center for Best Practices Introduction to the Day – Offshore Wind Update Thomas Brostrøm CEO Ørsted North America, Offshore Offshore Wind Summit Thomas Brostrøm, CEO Ørsted North America, Offshore Offshore Wind Update September 25, 2020 Ranked most sustainable company in the world 2 Significant transformation of Ørsted over the past decade 1 Note 1: Figures taken from Ørsted’s Annual Report 2019. Excluding Radius (power distribution business which was divested during 2019) Note 2: ROCE target for 2019-2025 3 Note 3: International share calculated based on Group EBITDA excl. divestments and miscellaneous un-allocated costs totalling 16 DKKbn The first major energy company to reach net-zero emissions in its energy generation – We will become carbon neutral by 2025. – This will make Ørsted the first major energy company to reach net-zero emissions in its energy generation – far ahead of science-based decarbonization targets for limiting global warming to 1.5°C.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Offshore Wind Market Report & Insights 2020
    RAMPION OFFSHORE WIND FARM — COURTESY OF ATKINS THE BUSINESS NETWORK FOR OFFSHORE WIND U.S. OFFSHORE WIND MARKET REPORT & INSIGHTS 2020 MEMBERS ONLY The Business Network for Offshore Wind’s2020 U.S. Offshore Wind Market and Insights offers an analysis of federal and state government activity to better understand how it may affect your business planning and the industry holistically. The federal government has turned its attention to the burgeoning industry to offer more regulation. Congress and federal agencies beyond the Department of Interior’s Bureau of Ocean and Energy Management and U.S. Department of Energy are now affecting how the offshore wind industry will operate into the future. This report also discusses how some of the challenges facing offshore wind are being addressed. The health and safety of workers – whether onshore or offshore – are a paramount tenet within the industry. Particular- ly at this time, the offshore industry remains proactive in its response to the coronavirus epidemic, having put in place telework directives, eliminating unnecessary travel, and following government guidelines. As a result of these protocols, Europe has reported minimal disruptions to the supply chains and the 15 offshore wind projects in the U.S., remain in the planning and development stages. It is too soon to know exactly how the global COVID-19 epidemic disruption will affect the U.S. offshore wind in- dustry. Our main concern centers around the economic hardship a long-term shutdown and recession would place on secondary and tertiary U.S. suppliers. It is important to point out, however, that there is almost 10GWs of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • WIND ENERGY Renewable Energy and the Environment
    WIND ENERGY Renewable Energy and the Environment © 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC WIND ENERGY Renewable Energy and the Environment VaughnVaughn NelsonNelson CRC Press Taylor Si Francis Group BocaBoca RatonRaton LondonLondon NewNewYor Yorkk CRCCRC PressPress isis an an imprintimprint ofof thethe TaylorTaylor && FrancisFrancis Group,Group, anan informa informa businessbusiness © 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group 6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300 Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742 © 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC CRC Press is an imprint of Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business No claim to original U.S. Government works Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 International Standard Book Number-13: 978-1-4200-7568-7 (Hardcover) This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher cannot assume responsibility for the valid- ity of all materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and publishers have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all material reproduced in this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish in this form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may rectify in any future reprint. Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or uti- lized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopy- ing, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the publishers.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Term Contracts for Offshore Wind Energy Generation
    D.P.U. 21-40 Responses to the Department’s First Set of Information Requests Attachment DPU 1-12 Page 1 of 156 H.O.: Alice Davey February 23, 2021 Patrick Woodcock Commissioner Department of Energy Resources 100 Cambridge St. Suite 1020, Boston, MA 02114 Subject: 1600 MW Offshore Wind RFP The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) defined Environmental Justice as follows: “Environmental justice (EJ) is the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color, national origin, or income with respect to the development, implementation and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations and policies”. In other words, Environmental Justice is racial justice. As currently drafted, the 1600 MW Offshore Wind RFP fails to make support of environmental justice an important element of the RFP selection criteria, thus leaving the opportunity for the project to have a profound environmental and economic impact on the Commonwealth’s too numerous environmental justice communities to the good will of project developers. We can and must do better. This is the largest such project in the Commonwealth’s history and represents a capital investment of between $4-5B. The workers and companies engaged in this solicitation have a leg up to become the leaders of tomorrow’s offshore wind industry. Your Administration projects that half of Massachusetts’ energy may come from offshore wind by 2050. This solicitation represents just the beginning of what will be tens of billions of dollars’ worth of economic activity and tens of thousands of jobs in the decades ahead. Choices made today set the course for industry growth and workforce development for the years to come.
    [Show full text]
  • Document.Pdf
    CONFIDENTIAL OFFERING MEMORANDUM This Investment Memorandum (“Memorandum”) is furnished to prospective purchasers solely to facilitate the purchaser’s consideration of the property known as Smokey Trail Apartments (510 Smokey Trail Drive) located in Limon, CO (“Property”). The Memorandum contains proprietary information and was prepared by Olive Real Estate Group, Inc. using information compiled from sources we consider to be reliable. However, the Seller makes no representations or warranties herein and the building is being sold in an “as is, where-is” condition. By receipt of this Memorandum, you agree that: (a) the Memorandum and its contents are of a confidential nature and that you will hold and treat it in strictest confidence; (b) you will not reproduce, transmit or disseminate the information contained in the Memorandum through any means, or disclose this Memorandum or any of its contents to any other entity without the prior written authorization of Olive Real Estate Group, Inc. nor will you use this Memorandum or any of its contents in any fashion or manner detrimental to the interests of Olive Real Estate Group, Inc. or seller; and (c) upon request you will return the Memorandum without retaining any copy or extracting any portion thereof. This Memorandum does not purport to be all-inclusive or to contain all the information which prospective purchasers may desire. Certain documents, including leases and other materials, are described herein in summary form. The summaries are not complete descriptions of the full agreements. Interested parties are expected to review all such documents independently. Financial projections are provided for reference purposes only and are based on assumptions relating to the general economy, competition and other factors beyond the control of Olive Real Estate Group, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Enbridge's Energy Infrastructure Assets
    Enbridge’s Energy Infrastructure Assets Last Updated: Aug. 4, 2021 Energy Infrastructure Assets Table of Contents Crude Oil and Liquids Pipelines .................................................................................................... 3 Natural Gas Transmission Pipelines ........................................................................................... 64 Natural Gas Gathering Pipelines ................................................................................................ 86 Gas Processing Plants ................................................................................................................ 91 Natural Gas Distribution .............................................................................................................. 93 Crude Oil Tank Terminals ........................................................................................................... 96 Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines ................................................................................................... 110 NGL Fractionation ..................................................................................................................... 111 Natural Gas Storage ................................................................................................................. 112 NGL Storage ............................................................................................................................. 119 LNG Storage ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Building North Carolina's Offshore Wind Supply Chain the Roadmap for Leveraging Manufacturing and Infrastructure Advantages
    Building North Carolina's Offshore Wind Supply Chain The roadmap for leveraging manufacturing and infrastructure advantages March 2021Subtitle Copyright This report and its content is copyright of BVG Associates LLC - © BVG Associates 2021. All rights are reserved. Disclaimer This document is intended for the sole use of the Client who has entered into a written agreement with BVG Associates LLP (referred to as “BVGA”). To the extent permitted by law, BVGA assumes no responsibility whether in contract, tort including without limitation negligence, or otherwise howsoever, to third parties (being persons other than the Client) and BVGA shall not be liable for any loss or damage whatsoever suffered by virtue of any act, omission or default (whether arising by negligence or otherwise) by BVGA or any of its employees, subcontractors or agents. A Circulation Classification permitting the Client to redistribute this document shall not thereby imply that BVGA has any liability to any recipient other than the Client. This document is protected by copyright and may only be reproduced and circulated in accordance with the Circulation Classification and associated conditions stipulated in this document and/or in BVGA’s written agreement with the Client. No part of this document may be disclosed in any public offering memorandum, prospectus or stock exchange listing, circular or announcement without the express and prior written consent of BVGA. Except to the extent that checking or verification of information or data is expressly agreed within the written scope of its services, BVGA shall not be responsible in any way in connection with erroneous information or data provided to it by the Client or any third party, or for the effects of any such erroneous information or data whether or not contained or referred to in this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Wind Market and Economic Analysis
    Offshore Wind Market and Economic Analysis Annual Market Assessment Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy Client Contact Michael Hahn, Patrick Gilman Award Number DE-EE0005360 Navigant Consulting, Inc. 77 Bedford Street Suite 400 Burlington, MA 01803-5154 781.270.8314 www.navigant.com February 22, 2013 U.S. Offshore Wind Market and Economic Analysis Annual Market Assessment Document Number DE-EE0005360 Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy Michael Hahn Patrick Gilman Prepared by: Navigant Consulting, Inc. Lisa Frantzis, Principal Investigator Lindsay Battenberg Mark Bielecki Charlie Bloch Terese Decker Bruce Hamilton Aris Karcanias Birger Madsen Jay Paidipati Andy Wickless Feng Zhao Navigant Consortium Member Organizations Key Contributors American Wind Energy Association Jeff Anthony and Chris Long Great Lakes Wind Collaborative John Hummer and Victoria Pebbles Green Giraffe Energy Bankers Marie DeGraaf, Jérôme Guillet, and Niels Jongste National Renewable Energy Laboratory Eric Lantz Ocean & Coastal Consultants (a COWI company) Brent D. Cooper, P.E., Joe Marrone, P.E., and Stanley M. White, P.E., D.PE, D.CE Tetra Tech EC, Inc. Michael D. Ernst, Esq. Offshore Wind Market and Economic Analysis Page ii Document Number DE-EE0005360 Notice and Disclaimer This report was prepared by Navigant Consulting, Inc. for the exclusive use of the U.S. Department of Energy – who supported this effort under Award Number DE-EE0005360. The work presented in this report represents our best efforts and judgments based on the information available at the time this report was prepared. Navigant Consulting, Inc. is not responsible for the reader’s use of, or reliance upon, the report, nor any decisions based on the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Enbridge's Economic Impact on Colorado
    Enbridge’s economic impact on Colorado Enbridge, a North American energy These activities deliver a variety As the world’s population grows, delivery leader, was established of economic benefits to multiple we’ll need all forms of energy—crude in 1949 and exists to fuel people’s American states—and these aspects oil, natural gas, renewables—to meet quality of life. of our operations also fuel people’s rising global energy demand. As a quality of life, whether they’re: company with both pipelines and wind We move a very large slice of turbines, Enbridge is delivering energy North America’s oil, natural gas and • well-paying jobs in towns and cities; security and driving transformation natural gas liquids, safely and reliably. • tax revenue that can help build toward a lower-carbon economy. We operate North America’s premium schools, hospitals and roads; natural gas transmission franchise, • procurement spending that We’re proud to deliver economic crude oil and liquids pipeline business, stimulates local economies; or benefits in the states where we and natural gas utility business. • grants and volunteer labor for do business. community-strengthening projects. 1 Norman Wells Zama Fort St. John Athabasca Fort McMurray Cheecham Kirby Lake Edmonton Hardisty Kerrobert Calgary Vancouver Regina Lethbridge Cromer Seattle Fredericton Rowatt Gretna Halifax Clearbrook Montreal Minot Superior Bualo Edgar Toronto Boston Westover Sarnia Dawn Bualo Energy assets, Casper Stockbridge New York operations and projects Chatham Leidy Guernsey Oakford Channahon Philadelphia Enbridge’s operations, projects, Gurley Toledo and/or asset ownership interests Flanagan Chicago Steckman in Colorado include: • DCP Midstream natural gas gathering Ridge lines and processing facilities in the Salisbury Accident Denver/Fort Collins, Grand Junction and Denver Kit Carson areas.
    [Show full text]