Groundsure Review with Full Planning

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Groundsure Review with Full Planning Groundsure Review with Full Planning Search Details Prepared for: GoodyBurrett LLP Matter: CC/LC/16801/1/LandRes Client address: St. Martin’s House, 63 West Stockwell Street, Essex, CO1 1HE Property: The Bridge Project, 20 Gainsborough Street, Sudbury, CO10 2EU Data Supplier: Groundsure Sovereign House, Church Street, Brighton, BN1 1UJ Date Returned: Property type: 16/07/2020 Commercial This search was compiled by the Data Supplier above and provided by InfoTrack Ltd - t: 0207 186 8090, e: [email protected]. This search is subject to terms and conditions issued by InfoTrack which can be viewed at www.infotrack.co.uk or supplied on request. This search is also subject to terms and conditions issued by the Data Supplier, available on request. InfoTrack and the Data Supplier above are registered with the Property Codes Compliance Board (PCCB) as subscribers to the Search Code. The PCCB independently monitors how registered firms maintain compliance with the Code. Visit www.propertycodes.org.uk for more information. InfoTrack UK Limited, Level 11, 91 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8RT T: 0207 186 8090 E: [email protected] The Bridge Project, 20 Gainsborough Street, Sudbury, CO10 2EU Written by: R Marten BSc AIEMA AMIEnvSc Professional opinion Reviewed by: F Brocklehurst BSc AIEMA Contaminated Land Low: Acceptable Risk page 4 Flood Risk Negligible page 7 Consultant’s guidance and recommendations inside. © Crown copyright and database rights 2020. Ordnance Survey licence 100035207 Operational Environmental Risk Contaminated land liability Low page 4 Ground Stability Banking security Not identified Is it likely that the property will represent acceptable banking security from a contaminated land Radon perspective? Passed Yes Energy Statutory or 3rd party action Identified page 8 Is there a risk of statutory (e.g. Part 2A EPA 1990) or Transportation third party action being taken against the site? Not identified Unlikely Planning Constraints Environmental liability Identified page 10 Is there a risk that the property value may be impacted due to contaminated land liability issues? Planning Applications Unlikely 155 page 10 [email protected] Ref: IT-8901848 Your ref: IT-8901848 [email protected] Grid ref: 587143 241238 08444 159 000 Date: 16 July 2020 The Bridge Project, 20 Gainsborough Ref: IT-8901848 Street, Sudbury, CO10 2EU Your ref: IT-8901848 Grid ref: 587143 241238 Useful contacts Babergh District Council: Environment Agency National Customer http://www.babergh.gov.uk Contact Centre (NCCC): [email protected] [email protected] 01473 826 622 03708 506 506 Overview of findings and recommendations To save you time when assessing the report, we only provide maps and data tables of features within the search radius that we have identified to be of note. These relate to environmental risks that may have liability implications, affect insurance premiums, property values and/or a lender's willingness to lend. You can view the fully comprehensive library of information we have searched on page 63. Contaminated Land Groundsure has not identified any significant contaminated land issues at the site. As the site is to be redeveloped a Phase 1 Risk Assessment may be required, particularly if the redevelopment is for a highly sensitive end use (i.e. residential purposes). It is worth confirming this with the Planning Department at the Local Authority and if a Phase 1 assessment is necessary, we can undertake this work for you. For a quote, please contact Groundsure at [email protected]. This quotation would include a discount to reflect the data in the report already undertaken for the study area. As a guide, a standard Phase 1 assessment is priced at around £1245 + VAT including disbursements. Flood Risk National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) A site-specific flood risk assessment should be provided for all development in Flood Zones 2 and 3. In Flood Zone 1, an assessment should accompany all proposals involving: sites of 1 hectare or more; land which has been identified by the Environment Agency as having critical drainage problems; land identified in a strategic flood risk assessment as being at increased flood risk in future; or land that may be subject to other sources of flooding, where its development would introduce a more vulnerable use. The NPPF states that the flood risk assessment should identify and assess the risks of all forms of flooding to and from the development and demonstrate how these flood risks will be managed so that the development remains safe throughout its lifetime, taking climate change into account. Those proposing developments should take advice from the emergency services when producing an evacuation plan for the development as part of the flood risk assessment. Contact us with any questions at: Date: 16 July 2020 [email protected] 2 08444 159 000 The Bridge Project, 20 Gainsborough Ref: IT-8901848 Street, Sudbury, CO10 2EU Your ref: IT-8901848 Grid ref: 587143 241238 Other considerations These are next steps associated with non-environmental search returns on matters of energy and transport infrastructure, mobile masts, and planning constraints. Energy Wind Existing or proposed wind installations have been identified within 10km. Next steps for consideration: use the details given in the report to find out more about the potential impacts on the property contact the operating company and the relevant Local Authority for further information visit the area in order to more accurately assess the impact this wind development would have on the property Solar Existing or proposed solar installations have been identified within 5km of the property. Next steps for consideration: use the details given in the report to find out more about the potential impacts on the property by contacting the operating company and/or Local Authority visit the area in order to more accurately assess the impact this solar farm would have on the property Projects One or more nationally significant energy infrastructure projects has been identified within 5km of the property. Next steps for consideration: visit the National Infrastructure Planning website at https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/projects/, where further details on nationally significant infrastructure projects, including environmental impact assessments, can be found Planning constraints Visual and cultural designations The property lies within 250m of a visually or culturally protected site or area. Next steps for consideration: seek further guidance from the local planning department on any likely restrictions if considering any property development Contact us with any questions at: Date: 16 July 2020 [email protected] 3 08444 159 000 The Bridge Project, 20 Gainsborough Ref: IT-8901848 Street, Sudbury, CO10 2EU Your ref: IT-8901848 Grid ref: 587143 241238 Consultant's assessment Environmental searches are designed to ensure that significant hazards and risks associated with this property are identified and considered alongside the investment in or purchase of a property. Please see page 2 for further advice. Contaminated Land The Contaminated Land assessment has been completed Past Land Use Low by a qualified environmental consultant and includes a Waste and Landfill Low manual review of our extensive collection of high Current and Recent Industrial Low detailed Ordnance Survey maps and environmental data. Operational environmental Low Please see page 14 for details of the identified issues. risk Current and proposed land use Current land use Groundsure has not been advised by the client (or their advisers) of the current use of the property. Groundsure has therefore made a best judgement based on the available information that the property is likely to be used for commercial purposes. The site has been identified to comprise a building in the north east, three minor units in the north west and two buildings in the south west. The remainder of the plot consists of hardstanding. Proposed land use Groundsure has been advised that the property will be redeveloped for residential purposes. Site location The site lies within a mixed residential and commercial area of Sudbury, Suffolk. Surrounding area North: Gainsborough Street with commercial and residential premises beyond. South: An access road with a commercial building beyond. East: Residential dwellings with gardens. West: Commercial premises and a church. Historical land use On-site The site history, based on a review of Groundsure's high detailed historical mapping, is as follows: 1884 - The site had been developed prior to this date and comprised a building in the north east and adjoining buildings in the north and centre, with a minor unit in the north west and two glasshouses in the south west. Contact us with any questions at: Date: 16 July 2020 [email protected] 4 08444 159 000 The Bridge Project, 20 Gainsborough Ref: IT-8901848 Street, Sudbury, CO10 2EU Your ref: IT-8901848 Grid ref: 587143 241238 1884 - 1925 - No significant changes were observed. 1926 - The glasshouses and the building in the centre had been cleared. Four units were observed across the southern half of the site. 1926 - 1938 - No significant changes were observed. 1955 - The units had undergone further reconfigurations by this time and an additional unit was noted in the centre. 1955 - 1973 - No significant changes were observed. 1976 - The unit in the centre had been cleared and the site had been reconfigured to comprise two buildings in the north east and north west and two units and an open-sided structure in the south west. 1976 - 1989 - No significant changes were observed. 1990 - The open-sided structure had been removed. 2006 - (Aerial Photography) A minor unit was noted in the west, bringing the site into its current format. Surrounding area No potentially contaminative land uses have been identified in proximity to the study site. Environmental permits and register entries No Environmental Permits of concern have been identified on site or in proximity to the property. No entries on the Local Authority's Contaminated Land Register have been identified within 250m of the site.
Recommended publications
  • Joint Babergh and Mid Suffolk District Council Landscape Guidance August 2015
    Joint Babergh and Mid Suffolk District Council Landscape Guidance August 2015 Joint Babergh and Mid Suffolk District Council Landscape Guidance 2015 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The landscape of Babergh and Mid Suffolk (South and North Suffolk) is acknowledged as being attractive and an important part of why people choose to live and work here. However current pressures for development in the countryside, and the changing agricultural and recreational practices and pressures, are resulting in changes that in some instances have been damaging to the local character and distinctiveness of the landscape. 1.1.1 Some development is necessary within the countryside, in order to promote a sustainable prosperous and vibrant rural economy. However, such development would be counterproductive if it were to harm the quality of the countryside/landscape it is set within and therefore the quality of life benefits, in terms of health and wellbeing that come from a rural landscape in good condition.1 1.1.2 The Council takes the view that there is a need to safeguard the character of both districts countryside by ensuring new development integrates positively with the existing character. Therefore, a Landscape Guidance has been produced to outline the main elements of the existing character and to outline broad principles that all development in the countryside will be required to follow. 1.1.3 Well designed and appropriately located development in the countryside can capture the benefits of sustainable economic development whilst still retaining and enhancing valuable landscape characteristics, which are so important to Babergh and Mid Suffolk. 1.1.4 The protection and enhancement of both districts landscape is essential not only for the intrinsic aesthetic and historic value that supports tourism and the economy for the area but also to maintain the quality of life for the communities that live in the countryside.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Qualities of the Dedham Vale AONB Evaluation of Area Between Bures and Sudbury
    Special Qualities of the Dedham Vale AONB Evaluation of Area Between Bures and Sudbury Final Report July 2016 Alison Farmer Associates 29 Montague Road Cambridge CB4 1BU 01223 461444 [email protected] In association with Julie Martin Associates and Countryscape 2 Contents 1: Introduction .................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Appointment............................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Background and Scope of Work.............................................................................. 3 1.3 Natural England Guidance on Assessing Landscapes for Designation ................... 5 1.4 Methodology and Approach to the Review .............................................................. 6 1.5 Format of Report ..................................................................................................... 7 2: The Evaluation Area ...................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Landscape Character Assessments as a Framework ............................................. 8 2.2 Defining and Reviewing the Evaluation Area Extent ................................................ 9 3: Designation History ..................................................................................................... 10 3.1 References to the Wider Stour Valley in the Designation of the AONB ................. 10 3.2 Countryside Commission Designation
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Landscape Study of East Bergholt and the Cultural Legacy of John Constable
    Historic Landscape Study of East Bergholt and the Cultural Legacy of John Constable On behalf of East Bergholt Parish Council November 2020 | Project Ref 641 Project Number: 641 Authored by: Claire Browne / Anne Johnson Approved by: Jonathan Edis Date: November 2020 Version: Version 4 Document version M:\LC\Projects\Projects\641 East Bergholt\Reports\V4 Historic Landscape Study of East Bergholt | 2 Executive Summary A historic landscape study of East Bergholt • Most importantly, this study assesses has been undertaken to inform the the landscape sensitivity of key Neighbourhood Plan. The study considers areas around East Bergholt, from a the archaeological dimension of the heritage and cultural point of view. village that stretches back into prehistory, It warns of threats of potential the time depth of the landscape around damage by inappropriate large scale the village documented in Constable’s development, despite Conservation paintings and the modern heritage and Area and AONB status. landscape context of the village. The study has identified the following areas A unique approach and methodology has of archaeological and landscape sensitivity: been used in this study to determine landscape value. It considers the • The former heathland north of the significance of East Bergholt to Constable’s village has archaeological potential. legacy as well as the presence of archaeological and heritage assets. • The historic landscape pattern is still The key findings of the report are as evident north of the village and is follows: highly susceptible to visual impacts. • East Bergholt is a very special English village as the birthplace of the • The former East Bergholt Common / internationally renowned painter John Heath at the centre of the village is Constable, and was his inspiration sensitive to encroachment and erosion throughout his life.
    [Show full text]
  • SLHC Calendar Spring 2020
    SUFFOLK LOCAL HISTORY COUNCIL EVENTS 7 March 2020 Societies Day Blackbourne Community Centre Elmswell Autumn 2020 Autumn Starts at 9.45am (doors open 9.00am) SEE advert below — 25 April 2020 Recorders Day Blackbourne Community Centre Elmswell 10.00am (doors open 9.30am) Spring 2020 6 June 2020 Focus on...Bury St Edmunds and its houses, Calendar How old is that house? (application form printed in newsletter) 26 September 2020 Focus on...The Ipswich Waterfront (application form printed in newsletter) Early notifications: 10 October 2020 - Peter Northeast Conference 14 November 2020 - Annual General Meeting speaker and venue tbc Benefits of Membership: · a twice yearly journal, the Suffolk Review, which publishes current research on Suffolk local history; · a twice yearly Newsletter keeping members in touch with the local history scene across the county of Suffolk; · a twice yearly Calendar of Events listing lec- tures, courses and exhibitions of interest to lo- Founded in 1953, the Suffolk Local History cal historians; Council (SLHC) is a registered educational · an annual lecture on a topic of recent historical charity, financed by its members, that exists research at our AGM held each November; to promote the study of local history and to · an annual local history conference featuring encourage historical research in the county of talks and presentations of recent historical re- Suffolk. SLHC also supports a network of lo- search; cal history recorders in towns and villages · access to Day Meetings hosted by our member throughout the county. Membership is open societies to learn more about their area of Suf- to individuals, local history societies, historical folk; groups and museums.
    [Show full text]
  • Display PDF in Separate
    rsTPsA W A T o c L S r RELOCATION OF SUFFOLK WATER COMPANY BOREHOLE D SECCOMBE HYDROGEOLOGIST NATIONAL RIVERS AUTHORITY 13 August 1992 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................... 1 2. Description of problem ............................................... 1 3. Licence requirements of new s i t e ..................................... 2 4. Proposed locations ................................................... 3 Dairy Farm, North Lopham ......................................... 3 Lovers Lane, Garboldisham ......................................... 5 Yaxley Crag borehole 3 A 2 ......................................... 7 Cranley borehole 10A ................... .......... ..... 8 5. Catchment water balances ............................................. 9 R. Lt O u s e ........................................................ 9 R. D o v e ............................................................ H 6. Areas of Environmental interest .................................... 12 7. Conclusion............................................................ 14 8. Recommendations..................................................... 15 This book is due for return on or before the last date shown below. Don G>*(1 W*II L»d.. London. N.21 C»l. No. 1208 DG 02342/71 List of Figures Figure 1 - Monthly abstraction data for two boreholes adjacent to Redgrave F e n ........................................................16 Figure 2 - Location for cross-section of R. Lt. O u s e ................. 17 Figure 3 - Geological
    [Show full text]
  • Cover Spring 2020.Pub
    SUFFOLK LOCAL HISTORY COUNCIL EVENTS 7 March 2020 Societies Day Blackbourne Community Centre Elmswell Autumn 2020 Autumn Starts at 9.45am (doors open 9.00am) SEE advert below — 25 April 2020 Recorders Day Blackbourne Community Centre Elmswell 10.00am (doors open 9.30am) Spring 2020 6 June 2020 Focus on...Bury St Edmunds and its houses, Calendar How old is that house? (application form printed in newsletter) 26 September 2020 Focus on...The Ipswich Waterfront (application form printed in newsletter) Early notifications: 10 October 2020 - Peter Northeast Conference 14 November 2020 - Annual General Meeting speaker and venue tbc Benefits of Membership: · a twice yearly journal, the Suffolk Review, which publishes current research on Suffolk local history; · a twice yearly Newsletter keeping members in touch with the local history scene across the county of Suffolk; · a twice yearly Calendar of Events listing lec- tures, courses and exhibitions of interest to lo- Founded in 1953, the Suffolk Local History cal historians; Council (SLHC) is a registered educational · an annual lecture on a topic of recent historical charity, financed by its members, that exists research at our AGM held each November; to promote the study of local history and to · an annual local history conference featuring encourage historical research in the county of talks and presentations of recent historical re- Suffolk. SLHC also supports a network of lo- search; cal history recorders in towns and villages · access to Day Meetings hosted by our member throughout the county. Membership is open societies to learn more about their area of Suf- to individuals, local history societies, historical folk; groups and museums.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSJOURNAL Winter 2017 [email protected] Charity No
    NEWSJOURNAL Winter 2017 www.sudburysociety.org.uk [email protected] charity no. 265228 Floodlit spire to disappear? Sadly, the United Reformed Church is closing down and a new home for the Society must be found. Many venues have been viewed but as yet no permanent home has been found. In the meantime, our January meeting will be in All Saints Church Hall in Church Street. An iconic part of our landscape Cows. How much do we know about them? Ranger Adrian Walters is often asked questions about the cattle on the Common Lands such as: what breed are they? Where do they go in the winter? The Society learned much at his latest talk. Read about it on page 8 Under the apple tree Halt! Who goes there? It was real sandals-and-sunhats There was much more than weather on the day of the gunpowder, treason and plot, Garden Party. Local songsters as we discovered on our visit to The Chordettes boogie-woogied Parliament. Who knew that the through a repertoire of Fifties cellars are searched by soldiers music and the grounds of before the State Opening; that Black our President’s house looked Rod is a person, not an object; that magnificent.Story and pictures every year a Parliamentary hostage on page 7 is taken? Learn more on page 6 Six basic strokes Will it ever be the is all it takes same again? Sixty years ago, most shops Move forward. Embrace change. proudly displayed a hand-written But at what price? sign over the front door; now, in Your Chairwoman discusses the the age of digital transfer printing, implications of a new-look Sudbury they are rare indeed.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Plan 2011-2031 Core Strategy & Policies
    Note: this version shows modifications made post-Hearing May 2013 and is a working draft for guidance only. (Text only – no maps) Babergh Development Framework Local Plan 2011-2031 Submission Draft Core Strategy & Policies Part 1 of Babergh’s New Local Plan Contents & List of Policies Executive Summary i Section 1: Introduction and Context 1.1 Introduction: Role of the Local Plan Part 1: Core Strategy 1 1.2 Structure of the Document 1 1.3 Summary of Position on the RSS (East of England Plan) 2 1.4 Key Characteristics and Issues for the Future 2 1.5 People and Places in Babergh 10 1.6 Vision, Objectives and Strategy 11 1.7 Objectives for Shaping Babergh’s Future 13 CS0 Applying the Presumption in Favour of Sustainable Development in 15 Babergh Section 2: 2.1 Settlement Pattern 16 2.2 Growth – How Much, and Where Will it Go? 22 2.3 Level of Economic Growth 24 2.4 Level of Housing Growth 25 2.5 Relationship of Jobs Growth to Housing Growth 26 2.6 Cross Boundary Connections and Joint Working 27 2.7 Strategy for Growth 30 CS1 Settlement Pattern Policy 31 CS2 Strategy for Growth and Development 32 2.8 Managing Future Growth 35 CS3 Chilton Woods Strategic Land Allocation and Strategy for Sudbury / 36 Great Cornard CS3a Strategic Broad Location – East of Sudbury / Great Cornard 39 CS4 Strategy for Hadleigh 41 CS5 Strategy for Growth in Babergh’s Ipswich Fringe 44 CS5a Sproughton Strategic Employment Land Allocation 47 CS5b Wherstead Strategic Employment Land Allocation 48 CS6a Brantham Regeneration Area Allocation 50 CS6 Strategy for Development
    [Show full text]
  • Suffolk Local Access Forum
    Suffolk Local Access Forum Title: Agenda Meeting Date: 14 July 2011 Author/Contact: Jill Christley Venue: Aspall Room, Kerrison Conference Centre, Stoke Road, Thorndon, nr eye, Suffolk, IP23 7JG Paper Number 1. 3.00 Welcome, apologies and housekeeping 2. Minutes of previous meeting LAF11/12 3. Declaration of interest 4. 3.10 Natural England • Lynda Foster Presentation Lead Advisor, People and Partnerships (Norfolk and Suffolk) • Natural Environment White Paper LAF 11/13 • Local Nature Partnerships LAF 11/14 • Coastal Access Verbal 5. 3.45 Independent Panel on Forestry • Minutes of meetings LAF11/15, 11/16, 11/17 • SLAF letter LAF11/18 • Correspondence with The Ramblers Verbal – AW • Norfolk LAF LAF11/19 6. 4.00 Divestment • Countryside Sites LAF11/20 • Rights of Way Verbal – AW 7. 4.15 SLAF Annual Report to Cabinet LAF10/25 8. 4.25 A11 Verbal – AW 9. 4.35 Correspondence / Update • Ipswich Chord o SCC Response LAF11/21 o Network Rail Reply LAF11/22 • LTP3 Verbal – DF • Coastal Verbal – AW • LAF coordinator Verbal – DF 10. 4.50 Any Other Business 11. 4.55 Public question time 12. 5.00 Dates & Venues of Future Meetings END LAF 11/12 Suffolk Local Access Forum Title: Minutes of meeting held in Westleton Village Hall, on 7 April 2011 Meeting Date: 14 July 2011 Author/Contact: Jill Christley Venue: Aspall Room, Kerrison Conference Centre, Stoke Road, Thorndon, nr Eye, Suffolk, IP23 7JG Minutes of meeting held in Westleton Village Hall on 7 April 2011. 1. Welcome, apologies and housekeeping. Present: Melinda Appleby (MA), David Barker (DB), Bryan Collen (Chairman), (BC), Barry Hall (BH), Ann Langley (AL), Sandy Martin (SM), Gordon Merfield (GM), Alan Moore (AM), Mary Norden (MN), Norman Southgate (NS), John Wayman (JW), Anthony Wright (AWr).
    [Show full text]
  • STATDEC Register Working Copy
    For further information please contact the SUFFOLK COUNTY COUNCIL REGISTER OF DECLARATIONS MADE UNDER SECTION 31(6) OF THE HIGHWAYS ACT 1980 Definitive Map team on 01473 264774 or email us at: [email protected] IPSWICH Links to PDF of DEPOSIT RECORDS ITEM DISTRICT DATE DEPOSIT Post Code of Address of land owner if different from Plan (or plan and Links to PDF of LANDOWNER PROPERTY NAME PARISH ADDITIONAL PARISHES EXPIRY OFFICE TYPE OF DEPOSIT Notes NUMBER COUNCIL RECEIVED land owner declaration property statement if Statement DATE ARCHIVE combined) NUMBER Aldringham-cum- 1 Thorpeness Ltd Land at Aldringham & Thorpeness Thorpeness Suffolk Coastal 30/11/1934 29/11/1940 A142/2 Statement with plan Thorpe 2 MoD RAF Bentwaters Eyke Rendlesham Suffolk Coastal 12/07/1983 11/07/1989 2458/08/16 Statement with plan Manor Farm, Ixworth Thorpe and lands at and around Ixworth & Ixworth 3 F Hiam Ltd Brandon St Edmundsbury 13/01/1984 12/01/1990 2593/01 Statement with plan Limeklin Farm, Brandon Thorpe 4 JS Blyth & Sons Ltd. Land at Fenbridge Lane East Bergholt Stratford St Andrew Babergh 27/01/1984 26/01/1990 2593/02 Statement with plan pp Hilliard & Ward 5 Sotterly Farms Ltd Sotterly Farms Henstead Ellough, Sotterly, Weston Waveney 05/04/1984 05/04/1990 A2545/3 Statement with plan Blaxhall, Tunstall, Gedgrave, Land at Campsea Ashe Estate, Gedgrave Hall Farm and Statement with plan and 6 E & H Greenwell Campsea Ash Butley, Sudbourne, Chillesford, Suffolk Coastal 13/08/1984 13/08/1990 2593/60 Butley Abbey Farm Statutory Declaration Orford Statement with plan and 7 E Baker Ltd Hole Farm Great Waldingfield Babergh 13/08/1984 13/08/1990 2593/147 Statutory Declaration Statement with plan & 8 W J Revell Land at Manor Farm, Ilketshall St Andrew Ilketshall St Andrew Waveney 16/08/1984 16/08/1990 2593/145 Statutory Declaration 9 Simper Farms, pp R N Simper Land at Manor Farm, Bawdsey Bawdsey Alderton Suffolk Coastal 28/08/1984 27/08/1990 2593/149 Statement with plan Lands at Grove Farm Rendham, Part of Manor Farm Friday St.
    [Show full text]
  • Vision for Prosperity
    SUDBURY Vision for Prosperity Delivering a Vision for Prosperity 12 October 2017 Welcome 01 WE WANT YOUR HELP TO SHAPE THE FUTURE OF GREATER SUDBURY YOUR AREA – YOUR PRIORITIES udbury is a fantastic place to work, live and visit, “Greater Sudbury” is more than just the town’s and has so much to offer to make the town and boundary line. Sudbury is a major employment, Sits wider catchment area better. We appreciate leisure and retail destination in Babergh District, so there is a raft of wonderful organisations, projects its influence is far reaching. For this reason, there are and initiatives which help support our people, place, more people that should have a say about its future and the local economy all of which make Sudbury the than just those who live in the town. success it is today. But places continually grow and evolve – they are never finished – so we also recognise We’d like you to think about: that Sudbury plays a crucial role in our future growth of • “Greater Sudbury” rather than just the town. This the District. will help to establish a common understanding There is a need to capture and build on what we of the key priorities and growth areas, where already have, and tie the different organisations and investment is best placed, where commercial their projects together to establish a clear way forward, investment may come from, and potential making it clear what is going to happen, when, and intervention measures to make it happen for us all. who will deliver the above vision.
    [Show full text]
  • Sudbury Relief Road: Strategic Outline Business Case
    REPORT NO 1.0 SUDBURY RELIEF ROAD: STRATEGIC OUTLINE BUSINESS CASE CONFIDENTIAL MARCH 2017 SUDBURY RELIEF ROAD: STRATEGIC OUTLINE BUSINESS CASE Suffolk County Council Final Confidential Project no: 70020874 Date: March 2017 – WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff 70 Chancery Lane London WC2A 1AF Phone: +44 020-7314-5000 Fax: +44 020-7314-5111 www.wsp-pb.com QUALITY MANAGEMENT ISSUE/REVISION FIRST ISSUE REVISION 1 REVISION 2 REVISION 3 Remarks First Draft Second Draft Final Final V2 Date 03/01/2017 03/01/2017 09/02/2017 15/03/2017 Prepared by Helen Scott Helen Scott Helen Scott Helen Scott Signature Checked by Jon Noble Jon Noble Jon Noble Jon Noble Signature Authorised by Jon Noble Jon Noble Jon Noble Jon Noble Signature Project number 70020874 70020874 70020874 70020874 Report number 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 ii PRODUCTION TEAM CLIENT Suffolk County Council Dave Watson WSP | PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF Associate Jon Noble Principal Krissel Alcaraz Engineer Helen Scott Sudbury Relief Road: Strategic Outline Business Case WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Suffolk County Council Project No 70020874 March 2017 Confidential iii 1 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................1 2 SETTING THE SCENE .................................................................2 3 STRATEGIC CASE ......................................................................7 3.1 BUSINESS STRATEGY .................................................................................. 7 3.2 STRATEGIC AIMS .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]