DOCSLIB.ORG

Display PDF in Separate

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

rsTPsA W A T o c L S r RELOCATION OF SUFFOLK WATER COMPANY BOREHOLE D SECCOMBE HYDROGEOLOGIST NATIONAL RIVERS AUTHORITY 13 August 1992 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................... 1 2. Description of problem ............................................... 1 3. Licence requirements of new s i t e ..................................... 2 4. Proposed locations ................................................... 3 Dairy Farm, North Lopham ......................................... 3 Lovers Lane, Garboldisham ......................................... 5 Yaxley Crag borehole 3 A 2 ......................................... 7 Cranley borehole 10A ................... .......... ..... 8 5. Catchment water balances ............................................. 9 R. Lt O u s e ........................................................ 9 R. D o v e ............................................................ H 6. Areas of Environmental interest .................................... 12 7. Conclusion............................................................ 14 8. Recommendations..................................................... 15 This book is due for return on or before the last date shown below. Don G>*(1 W*II L»d.. London. N.21 C»l. No. 1208 DG 02342/71 List of Figures Figure 1 - Monthly abstraction data for two boreholes adjacent to Redgrave F e n ........................................................16 Figure 2 - Location for cross-section of R. Lt. O u s e ................. 17 Figure 3 - Geological cross-section of R. Lt O u s e ..................... ..18 Figure 4 - Predicted Drawdowns for TM08/085 ............................ ..19 Figure 5 - Predicted drawdown for TM08/117 ............................ ..20 Figure 6 - Geological cross-section of R. D o v e ..........................21 Figure 7 - Predicted drawdown for Yaxley Crag 3 A ..................... ..22 Figure 8 - Predicted drawdown for Cranley 1 0 A ............................23 Figure 9 - River transfer calculation for R. Lt. O u s e ................. 24 Figure 10 - Total licence quantities for R. Lt. Ouse (33/42) ........... 25 Figure 11 - Stream hydrograph for R. Waveney at Ellingham............. 26 Figure 12 - Stream hydrograph for R. Dove at Oakley P a r k ............. 27 Figure 13 - Total licence quantities for R. Dove ( 3 4 / 1 7 ) ............. .. 28 List of Maps Map 1 - Location of borehole s i t e s .................................... 25 Map 2 - Location of S S S I ' s ............................................. 26 List of Appendices Appendix 1 - Hater level plot for April 1991 Appendix 2 - Details of TM08/085, Dairy Farm, North Lopham Appendix 3 - Details of TM08/117, Lovers Lane, Garboldisham Appendix 4 - Details of Yaxley Crag 3A, Hall Lane, Yaxley Appendix 5 - Details of Cranley 10A, Cranley, Eye Appendix 6 - Nett resource balance for R. Lt. Ouse catchment Appendix 7 - Nett resource balance for R. Dove catchment Appendix 8 - Details of known SSSI's Key to symbols used B Aquifer thickness (m) CCTV Closed circuit Television logging D Distance(m) Fe Iron K Permeability (m/day) MAC Maximum admissable concentration (EC guidlines) Mn Manganese Q Discharge (nr/day) r Radial distance from abstraction well (m) S Storage co-efficient SSSI Site of Special Scientific Interest T Transmissivity (nr/day) t Time (mins) tcmd 1000 nr/day W(u) Well function 1/s Litres per second flowrate pg/1 micrograms (10 ) per litre 1 1. Introduction This report is to investigate water resource implications of relocating a Suffolk Water Company borehole adjacent to Redgrave and Lopham Fens to one of four possible NRA boreholes. It is not intended to make any recommendations which will be influenced by budgetary constraints, but only to comment from a water resources viewpoint. 2. Description of problem Abstraction from two Suffolk Water Company boreholes (TM 04650 79200) adjacent to Redgrave and Lopham Fens has caused the water level within the fens to fall to an unacceptable level. Certain species of flora and fauna have been lost and others are in danger - case in point is the raft spider. Through various discussions between the NRA and Suffolk Water Company it has been agreed that the NRA would examine the feasibility in relocating the abstraction point from the existing site to one of the following sites - Dairy Farm, North Lopham NGR TM 0251 8361 NRA No. TM08/085 - Lovers Lane , GarboIdisham NGR TM 0011 8198 NRA No. TM08/117 - Yaxley Crag borehole 3A2 NGR TM 1205 7351 - Cranley borehole 10A NGR TM 1506 7232 The first two boreholes are part of the Great Ouse Groundwater Scheme and are used for river transfers to the Ely-Ouse scheme. The latter two are part of the Waveney Groundwater Scheme and are used for river support to Suffolk Water Company's Shipmeadow intake. The source of the Lt Ouse and Waveney Rivers is located near many SSSI sites. Therefore, in selecting an appropriate alternative site consideration has to be given to any likely effect extra pumping from either of the four sites would have on sensitive environmental areas. The alternative site may also have an effect on local abstractors and these will have to be considered as well. A map showing the location of the borehole in relation to the proposed sites is presented in Map 1. The location of all known SSSI's and environmentally sensitive areas is presented in Map 2. A water level contour was constructed for April 1991 - presented in Appendix 1. There is a good coverage of water level data within the Lt Ouse area, an average coverage within the Dove area, and a fairly sparse coverage between. However, there is a strong indication that the two GOGWS boreholes will affect the resources of the R. Lt. Ouse (with flow paths running in a westerly direction), while the remaining two boreholes will effect the resources of the R. Dove (with flow paths running in an easterly direction). National Rivers Authority - Relocation of Suffolk Water Company borehole 2 3. Licence requirements of new site The current licence which covers the abstraction from the boreholes adjacent to Redgrave Fen (7/34/16/*G/048) was issued ls‘ April 1969. The licence is an aggregate licence to cover the abstraction from Boreholes adjacent to Redgrave Fen TM 046 792 Abstraction limit = 3637 irr/day Borehole off Cranley Green Road, Eye TM 15447295 Borehole off Roman Road, Mendlesham TM 11756440 Boreholes at High Elm, Syleham TM 209 783 All annual combined abstraction must not exceed a total of 2500 tcma. Actual monthly abstraction data from 1967 to 1990 (inclusive) - see Figure 1 - was used to estimate the historical average annual use. The historical avaerage annual abstraction is estimated to be 2.8tcmd. Suffolk Hater Company have not as yet provided details of the annual abstraction rate for the new site. However, it has been assumed that the daily pumping rate will be 3.6tcmd and the drawdown effect will be based on continuous pumping for 200 days. It must be noted that if Suffolk Water Company abstracted on average 2.8tcmd then any pumping impact, as estimated for 3.6tcmd, would be much less. It is realised that pumping could last longer than 200 days, however, this limit is used to take into consideration the longest expected period of no recharge. National Rivers Authority - Relocation of Suffolk Water Company borehole 3 4. Proposed locations It has been proposed that there are four likely sites to be used as a replacement. These sites in detail are as follows. Dairy Farm, North Lopham NGR TM 0251 8361 NRA No. TM08/085 The 610mm diameter by 160m deep borehole is drilled through 29.0m of Drift (Boulder Clay; glacial sands and gravels) into chalk - see Appendix 2. The borehole was drilled in March 1985 by Smiths (Grimsby) as part of the Great Ouse Groundwater Scheme. The borehole has been acidised at 45 and 100m below ground level. A CCTV log was conducted prior to acidisation but is not available for inspection. The borehole is located approximately 5km from R. Lt. Ouse and within a relatively large extent of Drift. A geological cross-section for the Lt. Ouse and located through this site is presented - see Figure 3 for location and Figure 4 for the cross-section. This shows that the borehole is located within boulder clay overlying chalk. However, the aquifer is categorised as having a low sensitivity to pollution by nitrates leaching from agricultural soils. The water table (when drilled) is within the Drift and, with consideration to the drilling log, the aquifer is considered to be confined. There have been two pump tests. The first pump test was a four daily stage step/recovery test (each step lasting 480mins and recovery averaging 960mins). The maximum drawdown was 11.15m at a maximum discharge rate of 80.5 1/s. The. data was analysed (see Appendix 2.) using both the Bierschenk and Wilson method as well as the Eden and Hazel method. The results are as follows:- Bierschenk and Wilson Method (eiOmins) s = 0.001182Q + 0.0000003703Q2 T = 1032 nr/day Eden and Hazel Method s = 0.0002512Q + 0.00064561ogt0 + 0.0000003864Qr The second pump test was a seven day constant rate test which commenced 31 May 1985 with an average discharge of 62 1/s. The drawdown apparently reached an equilibrium after 2000mins with possible recharge/discharge discontinuities before 30mins. It was considered appropriate to analyse the data using type curves for a leaky confined aquifer (see Appendix 2.). The results were as follows:- o Type curve for leaky confined aquifer Where * — *W(u) = 1; 1/u = 1; s = 1.33m; t = 53.91 mins; r/B = 0.25 Calculated parameters:- T = 375 m2/day S = 0.00106 leakage factor = 919.6m Hydraulic resistance = 2255 days National Rivers Authority - Relocation of Suffolk Water Company borehole 4 The leakage could be coming from o recharge from the R. Lt. Ouse o recharge through the confining Drift o direct recharge from rainfall during the pump test (40.5mm recorded at Harling Farm, East Harling). Data is not available to adequately separate out any possibility or combination of recharge. The value of transmissivity derived from type curve analysis (T=375 nr/day) is consistent with other estimates within the area.
Recommended publications
  • A News and Events Diary from Wildlife and Conservation Groups in the Ipswich Area

    A News and Events Diary from Wildlife and Conservation Groups in the Ipswich Area

    Pantaloon Bee – see page 9 © Matt Garnham September - December 2018 A news and events Produced by the diary from wildlife and conservation groups in the Ipswich area BlueSnippets alien found White Admiral Lydia Woods in town Richard Stewart On the afternoon of Friday June 22nd my wife and I were walking down Westerfield Road in Ipswich and just past the gate into Christchurch Park we saw a white admiral on the pavement. It appeared to be a newly emerged While walking through Kiln Meadow on a warm adult but had probably been caught morning in July, I was more than a little surprised to in a vehicle slipstream. I cupped my hands around it, walked across the be confronted with a bright flash of blue! road and released the butterfly over the park railings. This was one of the On closer inspection I discovered a rather battered looking blue morpho butterfly new species I predicted for the park resting on the ground - not something you’d expect to see in Suffolk. These butterflies in future years as it has steadily been are generally found in Central and South America, although they are a popular choice colonising towards Ipswich. One was for butterfly houses – it’s likely this one escaped from the butterfly house situated at seen and photographed in The Dales Jimmy’s Farm. After taking some photos of this blue alien, I left the butterfly resting in a in 2015. With this in mind more patch of bindweed. While this was a lovely sight to see, hopefully it won’t be a regular honeysuckle, the larval food plant, occurrence.

  • Appropriate Assessment (Submission)

    June 2007 North Norfolk District Council Planning Policy Team Telephone: 01263 516318 E-Mail: [email protected] Write to: Jill Fisher, Planning Policy Manager, North Norfolk District Council, Holt Road, Cromer, NR27 9EN www.northnorfolk.org/ldf All of the LDF Documents can be made available in Braille, large print or in other languages. Please contact 01263 516321 to discuss your requirements. Core Strategy Appropriate Assessment (Submission) Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 The Appropriate Assessment Process 4 3 Consultation and Preparation 5 4 Evidence gathering for the Appropriate Assessment 6 European sites that may be affected 6 Characteristics and conservation objectives of the European sites 8 Other relevant plans or projects 25 5 Appropriate Assessment and Plan analysis 28 Tables Table 4.1 - Broadland SPA/SAC qualifying features 9 Table 4.2 - Great Yarmouth North Denes SPA/SAC 12 Table 4.3 - North Norfolk Coast SPA/SAC qualifying features 15 Table 4.4 - Norfolk Valley Fens SAC qualifying features 19 Table 4.5 - Overstrand Cliffs SAC qualifying features 21 Table 4.6 - Paston Great Barn SAC qualifying features 23 Table 4.7 - River Wensum SAC qualifying features 24 Table 4.8 - Neighbouring districts Core Strategy progress table 27 Table 5.1 - Screening for likely significant effects 29 Table 5.2 - Details of Settlements in policies SS1, SS3, SS5 and SS7 to SS14 and how policy amendments have resulted in no likely significant effects being identified 35 Maps Map 4.1 - Environmental Designations 7 Map 4.2 - Broadland Environmental
  • Fen Management Strategy - Explains the Role of the Strategy and Its Relationship to Other Documents

    Fen Management Strategy - Explains the Role of the Strategy and Its Relationship to Other Documents

    CONTENTS Acknowledgements Purpose & use of the fen management strategy - explains the role of the strategy and its relationship to other documents Summary - outlines the need for a fen management strategy Introduction - Sets the picture of development and use of fens from their origins to present day Approach to producing strategy - Methodology to writing the fen management strategy Species requirements: This section provides a summary of our existing knowledge concerning birds, plants, mammals and invertebrates associated with the Broads fens. This information forms a basis for the fen management strategy. Vegetation resource Mammals Birds Invertebrates Summary of special features for each valley: This section mainly identifies the botanical features within each valley. The distribution of birds, mammals and invertebrates is either variable or unknown, and so has been covered only in a general sense in the section on species requirements. However, where there is obvious bird interest concentrated within particular valleys, this has been identified. The botanical section provides a summary analysis of the fen vegetation resource survey and considers the relative importance of fen vegetation in a local and national context. A summary of the chemical variables of the soils for each valley has also been included. Ant valley Bure valley Muckfleet valley Thurne valley Waveney valley Yare valley The fen resource for the future: Identifies aims and objectives to restore fens to favourable nature conservation state Environmental constraints and opportunities - Using the fen management strategy: - During the fen vegetation resource survey, chemical variables of the substratum associated with various plant communities were measured. The purpose of these measurements was to provide some indication of the importance of substrate to the plant communities.
  • Rights of Way Improvement Plan 2007-2017

    Rights of Way Improvement Plan 2007-2017

    Norfolk County Council at your service Rights of Way Improvement Plan 2007-2017 Foreword by Cabinet Member with responsibility for Public Rights of Way Foreword I am pleased to be able to introduce There were an estimated 3.6 billion this Rights of Way Improvement Plan leisure trips to the countryside in for Norfolk 2007 - 2017. It heralds a 2005, with the average spend per trip new era extending opportunities to being £13.38. The estimated total visit the Norfolk countryside to all of value to the rural economy was £9.4 our community. billion. The Norfolk Local Access Forum, the Broads Local Access Forum, and County I see great benefit in the Council aligning Council Officers have contributed to this its major statutory transport planning plan. Significant public involvement was documents on walking, cycling, horse- secured through a consultation campaign; riding, soft-road driving, transport planning Citizens’ Panel research, and direct and health. Again, treating statutory and approaches made to disability, elderly, permissive countryside access like public ethnic, and Sure Start groups. On 20 transport, as part of the wider transport October 2004, a public conference of network, will make opportunities for interested parties discussed both the getting out and about more useful and assessment and proposed objectives. enjoyable. Enhanced management and Norfolk County Council’s countryside awareness should result from more access work has long recognised the people getting involved and sharing breadth of benefits that the service can responsibility. Understanding of the bring. Just three examples:- scope of the Council’s work, and satisfaction with it, should be boosted as Half-an-hour’s walking a day helps to the public gets directly involved in prevent high blood pressure and planning and monitoring progress.
  • Hannah Booth Report Greater Norwich Water Cycle Study 2020-01-23

    Hannah Booth Report Greater Norwich Water Cycle Study 2020-01-23

    Greater Norwich Water Cycle Study Greater Norwich Authorities Draft for consultation Project number: 60593120 February 2020 Greater Norwich Water Cycle Study Draft for consultation Greater Norwich Authorities AECOM Quality information Prepared by Checked by Verified by Approved by Hannah Booth Amy Ruocco Carl Pelling Amy Ruocco Graduate Water Senior Water Consultant Regional Director Senior Water Consultant Consultant Laura Soothill Graduate Engineer Christina Bakopoulou Flood Risk Engineer Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position 01 27/11/2019 Draft for comment CP Carl Pelling Regional Director 02 28/01/2020 Draft for CP Carl Pelling Regional Director consultation 03 05/02/2020 Draft for CP Carl Pelling Regional Director consultation Position statement February 2020 This report represents a working draft of the GNLP Outline Water Cycle Study. Consultation is ongoing with Anglian Water Services, the Environment Agency and Natural England who have not yet signed off the study conclusions and it is therefore subject to change. Further updates are also required to align with some recent changes to housing numbers and extension of the plan period to 2038 agreed in December 2019. These will be incorporated into the final report. Prepared for: Broadland District Council, Norwich City Council and South Norfolk District Council Prepared by: AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited Midpoint, Alencon Link Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 7PP United Kingdom T: +44(0)1256 310200 aecom.com © 2020 AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client.
  • Suffolk Argus

    Suffolk Argus

    Autumn 2017 SuffolkThe Argus The Newsletter of the Suffolk Branch of Butterfly Conservation Photo: Tony Fox Photo: Tony Common Blue pair at The Haven, Aldeburgh beach August 2017 Autumn 2017 Volume 70 1 The Suffolk Argus Comma larva, pupa and adult at Belstead Nature Reserve See Kevin Ling’s article on Page 10 Photos: Kevin Ling Shrike at work.......... article on Page 13 Impaled Swallowtail Photo: Jillian Macready 2 Autumn 2017 Contents Editorial 5 Letter from the High Sheriff of Suffolk 6 A14 Project, Newmarket 7 Urban Buzz 9 Belstead’s Nature Reserves 10 Observations on the Small Heath 12 Observing a Silver-washed Fritillary 12 AGM 13 Shrike at Work 13 Butterfly Thieves 14 Events Round Up 14 A future Suffolk Butterfly 16 Do you have a little time to spare and would like to help the Branch? Perhaps you have the inclination at the back editor. Collating Word documents and of your mind that you would like to help discussing the newsletter’s layout with the a conservation organisation but you don’t designer/printer is the backbone of the job. want to become involved in committee work. Then you might consider taking on Why not contact me to discuss the options? the role of The Suffolk Argus newsletter Peter Maddison [email protected] New Members New Members are warmly welcomed and that you will be able to take part in the to the Suffolk Branch. We hope you find recording of butterflies and join some of our your membership interesting and enjoyable events and work parties.
  • Environment Subject: New Dog Rules Thes

    Environment Subject: New Dog Rules Thes

    -----Original Message----- From: Sent: 23 August 2017 10:28 To: Environment Subject: New dog rules These rules seem to be ok. How will they be enforced? By whom will they be enforced? Are dogs allowed to foul public footpaths across fields or are owners supposed to pick up ? Regards Kirton From: ] Sent: 18 August 2017 19:02 To: Environment Subject: Dogs on leads Hi, Too much emphasis on punitive measures rather than proactive encouragement does not make for good practice. Irresponsible persons are likely to be the owners of un-chipped dogs, allowing foiling and will not have the income to pay the fine! Our MP wisely seeks caution. I'm left wondering about consistency of enforcement, interpretation and understanding of Woolley legislation by owners and those empowered to enforce. Notices in set places like the beaches etc are fine, but areas near roads seems unworkable defining what constitutes a reasonable definition of 'a road' will no doubt rack up legal costs and tie administration down. Focussed and targeted zones seem proportionate and reasonable to manage. Regards Sent from my iPad -----Original Message----- From: Sent: 18 August 2017 19:19 To: Environment Subject: Dogs on leads proposals Dear Sir, Many of these proposals are commonsense and are already observed by responsible dog walkers. However, there are serious problems with one item in the schedule: "Sports grounds, fields, greens and pitches (when in use as such)" It is certainly possible to keep dogs off football/cricket pitches and on a lead (though what about golf courses??) - but the rest of this proposal is simply wrong-headed.
  • Biodiversity Action Plan

    Biodiversity Action Plan

    BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN April 2018 BROADS IDB – BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN Front cover images (L-R) Marsh Harrier ©Artur Rydzewski; Norfolk Hawker © Milo Bostock; Water Soldier; Water Vole; Berney Marshes ©Mike Page; BIDB Digger BROADS IDB – BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN FOREWORD This Biodiversity Action Plan (Second Edition) has been prepared by the Broads Internal Drainage Board in accordance with the commitment in the Implementation Plan of the DEFRA Internal Drainage Board Review for IDB’s, to produce their own Biodiversity Action Plans by April 2010. As such, the original version was published in January 2010. This revised version aims to continue to align the Broads IDB with biodiversity policy and more specifically, the Biodiversity document for England, “Biodiversity 2020: A strategy for Englands’ Wildlife and Ecosystem Services” and build on the Government’s 25 Year Environmental Plan; A Green Future. In doing so, the document strives to demonstrate the Board’s commitment to fulfilling its duty as a public body under the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006 to conserve biodiversity. Many of the Board’s activities have benefits and opportunities for biodiversity, not least its water level management and watercourse maintenance work. It is hoped that this Biodiversity Action Plan will help the Board to maximise the biodiversity benefits from its activities and demonstrate its contribution to the targets as part of the Biodiversity 2020 strategy and achieve wider environmental improvement within its catchments. The Board has adopted the Biodiversity Action Plan as one of its policies and subject to available resources is committed to its implementation. It will review the plan periodically and update it as appropriate.
  • Transactions of the Norfolk and Norwich Naturalists' Society

    Transactions of the Norfolk and Norwich Naturalists' Society

    20 NOV 2Q02 I FXCHA^O'-"> 1 Norfolk Bird Report - 2001 Editor: Giles Dunmore Editorial 95 Review of the Year 98 Wetland Bird Surveys for Breydon and The Wash 1 05 Norfolk Bird Atlas 1 07 Systematic List 1 09 Introductions, Escapes, Ferals and Hybrids 248 Earliest and Latest Dates of Summer Migrants 253 Latest and Earliest Dates of Winter Migrants 254 Non-accepted and non-submitted records 255 Contributors 256 Ringing Report 258 Hunstanton Cliffs: a Forgotten Migration Hotspot 268 1 Yellow-legged Gulls in Norfolk: 1 96 -200 1 273 Marmora’s Warbler on Scolt Head - a first for Norfolk 28 Pallas’s Grasshopper Warbler at Blakeney Point - the second for Norfolk 283 Blyth’s Pipit at Happisburgh in September 1 999 - the second for Norfolk 285 Norfolk Mammal Report - 2001 Editor: Ian Keymer Editorial 287 Bats at Paston Great Barn 288 Memories of an ex-editor 298 Harvest Mice: more common than suspected? 299 Are we under-recording the Norfolk mink population? 301 National Key Sites for Water Voles in Norfolk 304 A Guide to identification of Shrews and Rodents 309 Published by NORFOLK AND NORWICH NATURALISTS’ SOCIETY Castle Museum, Norwich, NRl 3JU (Transactions Volume 35 part 2 October 2002) Please note that the page numbering in this report follows on from part 1 of the Transactions pub- lished in July 2002 ISSN 0375 7226 www.nnns.org.uk Keepsake back numbers are available from David & Iris Pauli, 8 Lindford Drive, Eaton, Norwich NR4 6LT Front cover photograph: Tree Sparrow (Richard Brooks) Back cover photograph: Grey Seal (Graeme Cresswell) NORFOLK BIRD REPORT - 2001 Editorial x On behalf of the Society 1 am pleased to present the annual report on the Birds of Norfolk.
  • Greater Norwich Infrastructure Investment Plan 2018-19 to 9 Subject 2022-23

    Greater Norwich Infrastructure Investment Plan 2018-19 to 9 Subject 2022-23

    Report to Cabinet Item 07 February 2018 Report of Director of regeneration and development Greater Norwich Infrastructure Investment Plan 2018-19 to 9 Subject 2022-23 Purpose To consider the Greater Norwich Infrastructure Investment Plan 2018-19 to 2022- 23. Recommendations 1. To approve the projects in Norwich to be included in the Greater Norwich Infrastructure Investment Plan 2018-19 to 2022-23 with the first year forming the Annual Growth Programme for 2018-19. 2. To recommend the draft of the Greater Norwich Infrastructure Investment Plan 2018-19 to 2022-23 to the Greater Norwich Growth Board (GNGB) for approval. Corporate and service priorities The report helps to meet the corporate priority a prosperous and vibrant city. Financial implications The total pooled CIL income for greater Norwich (from Broadland, South Norfolk and the city council) is currently projected to be as follows: INCOME To date 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ Balance 3,396,917 brought forward Actual CIL 3,214,589 receipts Forecast 4,719,530 7,271,195 9,586,646 10,956,189 10,179,162 8,853,709 CIL receipts Cumulative 3,396,917 6,611,506 11,331,035 18,602,230 28,188,876 39,145,265 49,324,427 58,178,136 income The report seeks £1,005,000 from pooled CIL for projects commencing in 2018-19 in Norwich. £55,000 is included in the council’s 5 year capital programme commencing in 2018-19 for the projects to be taken forward by the city council.
  • Place Shaping Panel

    Place Shaping Panel

    Place Shaping Panel Agenda Date Monday 18 January 2021 Members of the Place Shaping Panel Time Cllr P E Bulman Cllr S Lawn (Chairman) (Vice Chairman) 6pm Cllr N J Brennan Cllr G K Nurden Cllr S M Clancy Cllr L A Starling Cllr N J Harpley Cllr D M Thomas Place Cllr L H Hempsall Cllr J M Ward To be hosted remotely at: Thorpe Lodge Conservative Liberal Democrat Substitutes Substitutes 1 Yarmouth Road Cllr A D Crotch Cllr J A Neesam Cllr J F Fisher Cllr S Riley Thorpe St Andrew Cllr R R Foulger Norwich Cllr R M Grattan Cllr D King Cllr G F Peck Labour Substitute Cllr C E Ryman-Tubb Cllr B Cook Contact James Overy tel (01603) 430540 Broadland District Council Thorpe Lodge 1 Yarmouth Road Thorpe St Andrew Norwich NR7 0DU E-mail: [email protected] If any Member wishes to clarify details relating to any matter on the agenda they are requested @BDCDemServices to contact the relevant Director / Assistant Director. Public Attendance This meeting will be live streamed for public viewing via the following link: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZciRgwo84-iPyRImsTCIng. If a member of the public would like to attend to ask a question, or make a statement on an agenda item, please email your request to [email protected] no later than 5.00pm on 13 January 2021. 1 A G E N D A Page No 1 To receive declarations of interest under Procedural Rule no 8 3 2 Apologies for absence 3 Minutes of meeting held on 4 January 2021 5 4 Matters arising therefrom (if any) 5 Greater Norwich Growth Board: Joint Five-Year Investment Plan 9 Trevor Holden Managing Director 2 Agenda Item: 1 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST AT MEETINGS When declaring an interest at a meeting Members are asked to indicate whether their interest in the matter is pecuniary, or if the matter relates to, or affects a pecuniary interest they have, or if it is another type of interest.
  • 2019 No.146 August

    2019 No.146 August

    The Norfolk Natterjack AUGUST 2019 Number 146 . Researching The quarterly bulletin Norfolk s Wildlife of the Norfolk & Norwich Naturalists’ Society www.nnns.org.uk Norfolk & Norwich Naturalists’ Society Founded 1869 Reg. Charity No. 291604 Officers of the Society 2019/20 President: S. Barnes Vice Presidents: Dr R E Baker,A L Bull, R C Hancy, P W Lambley, D I Richmond Chairman: C Chapman, 14 Travers Court, Runton House Close, West Runton, Cromer, NR27 9RA. Tel: 01263 837038 Mobile: 07833463034 Email: [email protected] Secretary: J Emerson, 108 Sleaford Green, Norwich, NR3 3JT. Tel: 01603 961939 Email: [email protected] Assistant Secretary: F J L Farrow (address below) Treasurer: Position vacant Assistant Treasurer: J Froud (address below) Membership Committee: J Hubbard, 30 Church Lane, Hindolveston, Dereham, Norfolk, NR20 5BT Tel: 07713 681406 Email: [email protected] Secretary: J Froud, Westward Ho, 4 Kingsley Road, Norwich, NR1 3RB. Tel: 01603 440444 Email: [email protected] Programme Committee: Ms D L Cheyne, Wood House, Free Lane, Ditchingham, Bungay, NR35 2DW. Tel: 01986 894277 Secretary: Dr S R Martin, 3 St John's Close, Hethersett, Norwich, NR9 3DQ. Tel: 01603 810327 Email: [email protected] Publications Committee: Dr A R Leech, 3 Eccles Road, Holt, NR25 6HJ. Tel: 01263 712282 Email: [email protected] Secretary: Dr J Parmenter, Alpha House, 37 Station Road, Reedham, Norfolk NR13 3TB. Tel: 07710252468 Email: [email protected] Editor, Transactions: Dr N W Owens, 22 Springfield Close, Weybourne, Holt, NR25 7TB. Tel: 01263 588410 Email: [email protected] Editors, Bird & Mammal Report: Birds: A M Stoddart, 7 Elsden Close, Holt, NR25 6JW.