-----Original Message----- From: Sent: 23 August 2017 10:28 To: Environment Subject: New dog rules These rules seem to be ok. How will they be enforced? By whom will they be enforced? Are dogs allowed to foul public footpaths across fields or are owners supposed to pick up ? Regards Kirton From: ] Sent: 18 August 2017 19:02 To: Environment Subject: Dogs on leads Hi, Too much emphasis on punitive measures rather than proactive encouragement does not make for good practice. Irresponsible persons are likely to be the owners of un-chipped dogs, allowing foiling and will not have the income to pay the fine! Our MP wisely seeks caution. I'm left wondering about consistency of enforcement, interpretation and understanding of Woolley legislation by owners and those empowered to enforce. Notices in set places like the beaches etc are fine, but areas near roads seems unworkable defining what constitutes a reasonable definition of 'a road' will no doubt rack up legal costs and tie administration down. Focussed and targeted zones seem proportionate and reasonable to manage. Regards Sent from my iPad -----Original Message----- From: Sent: 18 August 2017 19:19 To: Environment Subject: Dogs on leads proposals Dear Sir, Many of these proposals are commonsense and are already observed by responsible dog walkers. However, there are serious problems with one item in the schedule: "Sports grounds, fields, greens and pitches (when in use as such)" It is certainly possible to keep dogs off football/cricket pitches and on a lead (though what about golf courses??) - but the rest of this proposal is simply wrong-headed.
79 VICTORIAN SUFFOLK'S GREAT ECCENTRIC: COLONEL GEORGE TOMLINE 1813-1889' byDAVID ALLEN BISHOP'S GRANDSON, MAVERICK politicianand landed proprietorof almostlimitlesswealth,builderof the FelixstoweRailway and pioneer developer of that town and port, the peppery and eccentric Colonel George Tomline was arguably the most colourful character of Victorian Suffolk.No respecterof either personsor institutions,he quarrelled so acrimoniouslywith the Lord Lieutenant of Lincolnshire,the Marquessof Granby,overthe North Lincolnshiremilitiaregimentof whichhe was honorary colonel, as to require the personal intervention of the Home Secretary, Lord Palmerston,for the maintenance of the publicservice.He challengedthe War Officeso successfully for a time as to render Landguard Fort virtually untenable for several years, and hounded the Chancellorof the Exchequer,Robert Lowe(thoughboth sat in Parliamentfor the sameparty)on the issueof the silvercoinage. His reputation as an arch-litigantwaslegendaryin hislifetime.In November 1858,when Tomline and hisimmediateneighbourSir GeorgeBroke(afterwardsBroke-Middleton)of BrokeHall,Nacton, were embroiledin a protracted boundary dispute,the latter'scousinandjunior legaladviser,Horace Broke,a solicitorof Lincoln'sInn and thus fullyacquainted with Tomline'sawesomereputation in the central courts,sent his clienta solemnwarning: From many things that I have seen and heard, I am convincedthat he is a dangerous man to quarrel with, and that he has the willand the power to be a very nasty enemyin everysenseof the word. He
Suffolk Coastal District Local Plan Core Strategy & Development Management Policies
Suffolk Coastal... ...where quality of life counts Suffolk Coastal District Local Plan Core Strategy & Development Management Policies Development Plan Document July 2013 Cover IMage CreDIt: - scdc Foreword this document, the Core Strategy of the Suffolk Coastal District Local Plan, is the first and central part of our new Local Plan which will guide development across the District until 2027 and beyond. Suffolk Coastal District is a uniquely attractive place to live and work, combining a strong economy with a natural and built environment second to none. those advantages however present us with the challenge of so guiding development that we continue to stimulate and support that economy, we provide attractive and affordable homes for current and future generations, and we achieve all that in a way which preserves and enhances that precious, but sometimes vulnerable, environment. the Core Strategy sets out a vision for the District as we go forward over the next 15 years. objectives derived from that vision, and the Strategic Policies designed to achieve those, do so in a way which recognises and builds on the diversity of the different communities which together make our District the wonderful place it is. they reflect both the opportunities and threats which that diversity brings with it. the Development Management Policies then set out in more detail specific approaches for different aspects or types of development to ensure that each contributes in a consistent way to those objectives and strategies. alongside these clear local aspirations, the Strategy has developed, evolved and been refined over a decade to ensure that it meets both its international obligations in terms of areas designated for their high quality nature conservation interest, and the contribution it can make to the wider sub-national and national economy, within continuously evolving national planning policies for our society as a whole.
Summer 2015 SuffolkThe Argus The Newsletter of the Suffolk Branch of Butterfly Conservation photo Bill Stone Small Tortoiseshell on nectar-rich Erysimum ‘Bowles Mauve’ on nectar-rich Small Tortoiseshell Summer 2015 Volume 63 1 2014 Butterfly Report 2014 Butterfly Report 2014 Butterfly Report The SuffolkDistribution Argus of Suffolk’s 2014Distribution Butterfly2014seven Butterfly BAPof Report Suffolk’s species Report seven BAP species Dingy Skipper 2014 Distribution of Suffolk’s ϭƐŝŐŚƟŶŐ seven BAP species 2-9 max seen DistributionsevenDistribution2014 BAP of Butterfly Suffolk’s species of Suffolk’s Report 10+ max seen 2014 Butter!y Report seven BAPseven species BAP species Distribution of Suffolk’s Distribution of Su"olk’s seven BAP BAP species species (Pages 11-14) Silver-studded Blue: 2014 tŚŝƚĞͲůĞƩĞƌ,ĂŝƌƐƚƌĞĂŬϮϬϭϰ ϭƐŝŐŚƟŶŐ ϭƐŝŐŚƟŶŐ 2-9 max seen 2-9 max seen 10+ max seen 10+ max seen White Admiral 2014 Grayling 2014 ϭƐŝŐŚƟŶŐ ϭƐŝŐŚƟŶŐ 2-9 max seen 2-9 max seen 10+ max seen 10+ max seen Wall: 2014 ^ŵĂůů,ĞĂƚŚϮϬϭϰ ϭƐŝŐŚƟŶŐ ϭƐŝŐŚƟŶŐ 2-9 max seen 2-9 max seen 10+ max seen 10+ max seen 2 Summer 2015 Contents Branch Contacts 4 New Members 5 Wider Countryside Butterfly Survey 5 2014 Butterfly Report 6 Purdis Heath SSSI Update May 2015 18 Notes on the Photos of Day-flying Moths 20 AGM 20 Photographic Competition 21 Six of The Best in 2014 - Part Two 22 New Beginnings 23 Seventy-Four Years Later 23 Farmers Do Listen - Sometimes! 24 Editorial Peter Maddison When this newsletter drops onto your WKH$*0'HWDLOVRIERWKWKHFRPSHWLWLRQ GRRUPDWRU,QER[RXUKLJKVXPPHUEXWWHUÀLHV DQGWKHQHZYHQXHIRUWKH$*0DUHZLWKLQ will be emerging.
Suffolk Shoreline Management Plan 2 Natural and Built Environment Baseline
Suffolk Shoreline Management Plan 2 Natural and Built Environment Baseline Suffolk Coastal District Council/Waveney District Council/Environment Agency November 2009 Final Report 9S8393 HASKONING UK LTD. ENVIRONM ENT Rightwell House Bretton Peterborough PE3 8DW United Kingdom +44 (0)1733 334455 Telephone +44 (0)1733 262 243 Fax info@peterborough.royalhaskoning.com E-mail www.royalhaskoning.com Internet Document title Suffolk Shoreline Management Plan 2 Natural and Built Environment Baseline Status Final Report Date November 2009 Project name Suffolk SMP 2 Project number 9S4195 Reference 9S4195/CCR/RKKH/Pboro Drafted by Rosie Kelly & Kit Hawkins Checked by Kit Hawkins Date/initials check KRH 20 / 05 / 2008 Approved by Mat Cork Date/initials approval MC 20 / 05 / 2008 CONTENTS Page GLOSSARY OF TERMS VI 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Structure of Report 1 1.3 Area of Interest 2 2 OVERVIEW OF STATUTORY DESIGNATIONS 4 2.1 Introduction 4 2.1.1 Compensation – managed realignment 5 2.2 Ramsar sites 6 2.2.1 Alde-Ore Estuary 6 2.2.2 Broadland 9 2.2.3 Deben Estuary 10 2.2.4 Minsmere-Walberswick 10 2.2.5 Stour and Orwell Estuaries 11 2.3 Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) 13 2.3.1 Alde, Ore and Butley Estuaries 16 2.3.2 Benacre to Easton Lagoons 16 2.3.3 The Broads SAC 17 2.3.4 Minsmere – Walberswick Heaths and Marshes 19 2.3.5 Orfordness and Shingle Street 20 2.4 Special Protection Areas (SPAs) 21 2.4.1 Alde-Ore Estuary 23 2.4.2 Benacre to Easton Bavents 24 2.4.3 Broadlands 24 2.4.4 Deben Estuary 25 2.4.5 Minsmere-Walberswick 25 2.4.6 Sandlings
Watsonia, 17, 183-198 (1988) 183 Plant Records Records for publication must be submitted to the appropriate vice-county Recorder (see Vice-county Recorders (1985)), and not the Editors. The records must normally be of species, hybrids or subspecies of native or naturalized alien plants belonging to one or more of the following categories: 1st or 2nd v.c. record, 1st post- 1930 v.c. record; only extant v.c. locality, or 2nd such locality; a record of an extension of range by more than 100 km. Such records will also be accepted for the major islands in v.cc. 102-104 and 110. Only 1st records can be accepted for Rubus, Hieracium and hybrids. Records for subdivisions of vice-counties will not be treated separately; they must therefore be records for the vice-county as a whole. Records of Taraxacum are now being dealt with separately, by Dr A. J. Richards, and will be published at a later date. New records for Irish vice counties are published elsewhere, usually in the Irish Naturalists' Journal. Records are arranged in the order given in the List of British vascular plants by J. E. Dandy (1958) and his subsequent revision (Watsonia, 7: 157- 178 (1969)). All records are field records unless otherwise stated. With the exception of collectors' initials, herbarium abbreviations are those used in British and Irish herbaria by D. H. Kent & D. E. Alien (1984) . The following signs are used: • before the record: to indicate a new vice-county record. t before the species number: to indicate that the plant is not a native species of the British Isles.
Ploszajski Lynch Consulting Ltd. Suffolk Coastal District Council Open Spaces Assessment October 2014 CONTENTS EXECUTUVE SUMMARY 1 1 INTRODUCTION 11 2 THE SUFFOLK COASTAL CONTEXT 16 3 STRATEGIC INFLUENCES ON PROVISION 21 4 DEMAND FOR OPEN SPACE 29 5 SUPPLY OF OPEN SPACE 38 6 THE CURRENT SUPPLY-DEMAND BALANCE 80 7 THE FUTURE SUPPLY-DEMAND BALANCE 90 8 PLANNING POLICY CONSIDERATIONS 91 9 ACTION PLAN 93 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The aims of the assessment 1) The aims of the assessment are to: To inform SCDC on the open space and recreational areas that are required to serve existing and new development, covering both the demand for and use of existing open space identifying areas of deficiency or surplus and highlighting priority locations for future provision. To identify the likely level of funding available from identified bodies, assisting in the delivery of the assessment and its action plan to ensure the area has access to good quality local and regional open space environments. To prioritise any funding for open space maintenance or projects from local authority budgets, including from the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) or Section 106. To identify the provision needed to support measures to promote greater physical activity locally. To establish the longer term sustainability of open spaces and ancillary features such as car parking and on-going funding or management. To review existing local standards of both provision and accessibility and recommend prioritised solutions in the form of amendments, improvements or continued use of existing standards. What the assessment covers 2) The assessment covers the following types of publicly accessible open space: Parks and gardens.
Standing Environment Group for the Greater Thames Estuary
Standing Environment Environment Group for the Greater Thames Estuary Arrangements for the provision of environmental advice in pollution incidents affecting sea and estuarial water and shoreline between and including Lowestoft to Ramsgate. Part One - General Overview PENULTIMATE DRAFT 8 September, 2011 M.C. King Greater Thames Estuary Standing Environment Group Operational Guidance Document (version one) July 2004 Page 0 of 91 Table of Contents 1 DISTRIBUTION LIST: ..........................................................................................................................3 2 RECORD OF AMENDMENTS............................................................................................................5 3 PREFACE……………........................................................................................................................6 4 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................................7 5 SCOPE OF THIS DOCUMENT..........................................................................................................7 6 THE STANDING ENVIRONMENT GROUP FOR THE GREATER THAMES ESTUARY ...........................8 6.1 TERMS OF REFERENCE. ............................................................................................................................. 8 6.2 SCOPE OF GROUP FUNCTIONS ................................................................................................................ 8 6.3 AREA OF OPERATION ..............................................................................................................................
Appendix L Essex and South Suffolk Shoreline Management Plan 2 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report
Appendix L Essex and South Suffolk Shoreline Management Plan 2 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report Environment Agency April 2010 Final Report 9T4884 NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY Introduction This report provides an assessment of the environmental impacts of the Essex and South Suffolk Shoreline Management Plan (SMP). The assessment is informed by the appraisal process within the SMP. The assessment seeks to establish the environmental impacts of the SMP, to evaluate the overall impact of the SMP and to suggest monitoring and mitigation to address any negative impacts. The overriding theme which emerges in this assessment is that the determination of actual impacts is extremely difficult due to the long timeline and uncertainties surrounding the plan and its impacts. The assessment does however confirm that the SMP provides for a wide range of positive impacts, and where negative impacts occur, they are the result of policy which seeks to maintain other environmental values. The Essex and South Suffolk Coast Essex has one of the longest coastlines of any English county, and this study covers approximately 440 km of coast between Landguard Point (the most southerly point of Felixstowe) and Southend. It is an unusual coastline incorporating a series of interlinked estuaries with open coast between them. The estuarine areas are dominated by muddy intertidal flats and saltmarshes, whilst the open coast has more varied features including clay sea cliffs and shingle, sandy and muddy beaches. Overall the coastline is predominantly low lying and protected by flood embankments or sea walls, together with groynes. As areas have been reclaimed from the sea, significant amounts of grazing marsh are at or below sea level.
rsTPsA W A T o c L S r RELOCATION OF SUFFOLK WATER COMPANY BOREHOLE D SECCOMBE HYDROGEOLOGIST NATIONAL RIVERS AUTHORITY 13 August 1992 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................... 1 2. Description of problem ............................................... 1 3. Licence requirements of new s i t e ..................................... 2 4. Proposed locations ................................................... 3 Dairy Farm, North Lopham ......................................... 3 Lovers Lane, Garboldisham ......................................... 5 Yaxley Crag borehole 3 A 2 ......................................... 7 Cranley borehole 10A ................... .......... ..... 8 5. Catchment water balances ............................................. 9 R. Lt O u s e ........................................................ 9 R. D o v e ............................................................ H 6. Areas of Environmental interest .................................... 12 7. Conclusion............................................................ 14 8. Recommendations..................................................... 15 This book is due for return on or before the last date shown below. Don G>*(1 W*II L»d.. London. N.21 C»l. No. 1208 DG 02342/71 List of Figures Figure 1 - Monthly abstraction data for two boreholes adjacent to Redgrave F e n ........................................................16 Figure 2 - Location for cross-section of R. Lt. O u s e ................. 17 Figure 3 - Geological