A4 Simple Report 1-Col No Divider Nov 2019

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A4 Simple Report 1-Col No Divider Nov 2019 Issue number: BT-JAC-020631 550-0003-EIA Bramford to Twinstead Scoping Report: Volume 2: Appendices May 2021 Page left intentionally blank National Grid | May 2021 | Bramford to Twinstead i Contents Contents ii Appendix 1.1 Transboundary Supporting Information 2 Appendix 2.1 Relevant Environmental Legislation, Policy and Guidance 6 Appendix 2.2 Local Planning Policy 23 Appendix 4.1 Outline Code of Construction Practice 31 Appendix 6.1 Key Characteristics of Landscape Character Assessment 44 Appendix 6.2 Landscape Assessment Methodology 51 Appendix 6.3 Visual Assessment Methodology 72 Appendix 6.4 Wireline and Photomontage Methodology 81 Appendix 6.5 Arboricultural Survey Methodology 87 Appendix 7.1 Biodiversity Supporting Information 91 Appendix 7.2 Ecology Survey Methodology 103 Appendix 7.3 Draft Habitats Regulations Assessment Screening Report 128 Appendix 17.1 Major Accidents and Disasters Scoping Table 144 Appendix 18.1 Cumulative Effects Assessment Long List Table 153 National Grid | May 2021 | Bramford to Twinstead ii Appendix 1.1 Transboundary Supporting Information National Grid | May 2021 | Bramford to Twinstead iii Page left intentionally blank National Grid | May 2021 | Bramford to Twinstead 1 Appendix 1.1 Transboundary Supporting Information Criteria and Relevant Considerations Result of the Screening Considerations Characteristics of the development: The Bramford to Twinstead project is a proposal to Size of the development consent and build a new c.27km 400kV electricity reinforcement and associated infrastructure between Use of natural resources Bramford in Suffolk and Twinstead in Essex. It includes Production of waste the removal of the existing 132kV overhead line Pollution and nuisances between Burstall Bridge and Twinstead Tee, and a new Risk of accidents substation at Butler’s Wood. It is fully contained within the UK, in the counties of Suffolk and Essex. Use of technologies Some of the resources required for the construction of the project are likely to be obtained from the global market, e.g. steel. It is envisaged that materials would be obtained locally where practicable. It is not likely that any waste, nuisances or accidents would extend beyond the border of the UK. No novel technologies are proposed that have potential for transboundary effects. Location of development and geographical area: The existing land use is largely agricultural land with What is the existing use? interspersed villages. The location of the development is approximately 130km from France (the closest EEA What is the distance to another European Economic state). Area (EEA) state? (Name EEA state) No physical works or impacts are likely to extend What is the extent of the area of a likely impact under beyond the jurisdiction of the UK. the jurisdiction of another EEA state? Environmental importance: There are no European sites within 2km of the project. Are particular environmental values (e.g. protected There are two European sites comprising Ramsar and areas – name them) likely to be affected? Special Protection Area (SPA) designations within 10km of the project. These are primarily designated for a Capacity of the natural environment. range of breeding and overwintering bird populations. A Wetlands, coastal zones, mountain and forest areas, Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) Draft nature reserves and parks, Natura 2000 sites, areas Screening Report has determined that the project is where environmental quality standards already unlikely to significantly affect any European site. exceeded, densely populated areas, landscapes of The project crosses the Dedham Vale Area of historical, cultural or archaeological significance. Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB), which is designated for its national (rather than international) landscape quality and cultural associations. It is the project’s intention to use underground cables within the AONB boundary to reduce the impact on the landscape. The project is likely to result in localised impacts to landscape, cultural heritage (including archaeology), soils, adjacent landowners and residents, biodiversity (including protected species), and the water environment. These impacts would be mitigated to reduce the significance of any effect. These impacts would not result in impacts to any other EEA state. Potential impacts and carrier: The pathways by which impacts could be spread are via By what means could impacts be spread (i.e. what air and water (such as rivers). However, none of the pathways)? anticipated effects are likely impact another EEA state. National Grid | May 2021 | Bramford to Twinstead 2 Criteria and Relevant Considerations Result of the Screening Considerations Extent: The extent of the impacts will vary for different What is the likely extent of the impact (geographical Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) topics. area and size of the affected population)? However, no significant effects are anticipated that could impact on another EEA state. Magnitude: The magnitude of change will vary for different EIA What will the likely magnitude of the change in relevant topics. However, none of the anticipated effects are variables be relative to the status quo, taking into likely to occur at a magnitude that would impact another account the sensitivity of the variable? EEA state. Probability: It is very unlikely that effects from the project would What is the degree of probability of the impact? impact on another EEA state during both normal conditions and exceptional situations such as accidents. Is the impact likely to occur as a consequence of normal conditions or exceptional situations such as accidents? Duration: No significant effects are anticipated that could impact Is the impact likely to be temporary, short-term or long- on another EEA state. term? Is the impact likely to relate to the construction, operation or decommissioning phase of the activity? Frequency: No significant effects are anticipated that could impact What is likely to be the temporal pattern of the impact? on another EEA state. Reversibility: No significant effects are anticipated that could impact Is the impact likely to be reversible or irreversible? on another EEA state. Cumulative impacts: There are a number of other proposed developments Are other major developments close by? within the Scoping Boundary and beyond, including proposed housing developments to the east of Hadleigh and east of Sudbury. The potential cumulative effects will be assessed within the EIA. However, no significant effects are anticipated that could impact on another EEA state. National Grid | May 2021 | Bramford to Twinstead 3 Appendix 2.1 Relevant Environmental Legislation, Policy and Guidance National Grid | May 2021 | Bramford to Twinstead iv Page left intentionally blank National Grid | May 2021 | Bramford to Twinstead 5 Appendix 2.1 Relevant Environmental Legislation, Policy and Guidance 1. Purpose of this Document The application for development consent would be considered by the Secretary of State primarily on the policies in the relevant National Policy Statements (NPSs), as described in Scoping Report Chapter 2: Regulatory and Planning Policy Context. However, when undertaking an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), the wider environmental legislation, policy and guidance relevant to the assessment is considered. This appendix sets out the environmental legislation, policy and guidance that is considered relevant to the project. This includes guidance produced by the local planning authorities where this is considered to be relevant to the EIA. Table 1.1 sets out the environmental legislation and policy relevant to the project. Table 1.2 sets out the relevant guidance that has been used to inform the technical chapters or guide the proposed assessment methodology. General environmental legislation, policy and guidance, which apply to more than one topic, are presented first in the respective tables, followed by topic-specific legislation, policy and guidance. A summary of the Infrastructure Planning (EIA) Regulations 2017, the relevant NPS (EN-1 and EN-5), the Electricity Act 1989, the Planning Act 2008 and the National Planning Policy Framework is provided in Chapter 2: Regulatory and Planning Policy Context. Table 1.1: Relevant Environmental Legislation and Policy Name/Reference Why it is Relevant to the Project How it Has Been Used/Assessed on the Project General environmental legislation that is relevant to more than one receptor National Grid is a statutory undertaker and under Section 85 of the Act has a duty to conserve and enhance the An assessment of the impacts on the SSSIs will be included within The Act increases measures for the management and protection the Environmental Statement (ES). of Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs). The project crosses Hintlesham Woods SSSI. The Act includes provision for public access to the countryside and Public Rights of Way and through open access land. The project The application for development consent will include a list of Countryside and Rights of Way crosses multiple Public Rights of Way within the Order Limits footpaths crossed by the project and any required temporary Act 2000 comprising bridleways, byways, footpaths, restricted byways, Long diversions or closures. Distance Walking Routes and cycle routes. Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONBs) are designated The duties under Section 85 of the Act were considered as part of under the Act, which sets out the requirements for conservation the decision making around undergrounding within
Recommended publications
  • The Spindle SEPT/Oct 2014 Cycleclubsudbury.Com
    The Spindle SEPT/oCT 2014 cycleclubsudbury.com Yet Another Bumper Edition ! on a more structured effort this year with a bit of 'proper training' and using a more specific aero bike than his trusty Eddy Merckx in the Summer lingers on and when it finally 2nd half of the series. disappears, it will leave us all wondering where it It all came good for him as he reaped the all went. During the last two months, a lot has rewards for his efforts. happened , with the rebirth of our CCS Road He boldly told me he enjoyed the experience, Race taking pride of place. but as I was always told, if you're enjoying it, Held on perfect summer’s day, Darren Rule's you ain't trying hard enough! So maybe more slick organisation of it all gave us an event to be to come for next season then David? proud of with many, many of you out there The ding dong battle for breaking new club helping towards its success. Just one unhelpful records has continued right through the season 'motorist' from Joe Public disrupted the final with Jonathan Weatherley regaining the 10mile sprint to the line for but as I was reminded by record which he had briefly held before Rob more than one observer, 'That's Racing'! Davies pinched it from him. He also tried out It made quite an impressive sight to see the the ultra fast course up in Hull where Rob had 'peloton' race around our local roads preceded posted his record ride recently and beat the by an array official’s cars and motorbike outriders current time by 6 secs with a 20.38.
    [Show full text]
  • SUFFOLK Extracted from the Database of the Milestone Society
    Entries in red - require a SUFFOLK Extracted from the database of the Milestone Society National ID Grid Reference Road Parish Location Position SU_BGIW00 TM 3372 8917 A144 BUNGAY Bungay Centre by the road SU_BGIW00A TM 351 881 A144 BUNGAY SE of Bungay on the verge SU_BGIW01 TM 3493 8814 A144 ST MARY SOUTH ELMHAM OTHERWISE HOMERSFIELD St Mary's Parish by the road SU_BGIW02 TM 3614 8724 A144 ST JOHN ILKETSHALL St John's by the road SU_BGIW04 TM 3739 8377 A144 ST LAWRENCE ILKETSHALL Ilketshall St Lawrence by the road SU_BGIW05 TM 3812 8269 A144 SPEXHALL Spexhall Hall by the road SU_BGIW06 TM 3850 8126 A144 SPEXHALL Spexhall by the road SU_BGIW07 TM 390 796 A144 HALESWORTH Bramfield Road by the road SU_BGIW08 TM 38964 78093 was A144 HALESWORTH Bungay Road, just before new bypass by lamp post SU_BGIW09 TM 3842 7682 A144 HALESWORTH Halesworth by the road SU_BGIW10 TM 397 756 A144 WENHASTON WITH MELLS HAMLET Mells by the road SU_BGIW11 TM 3982 7421 A144 BRAMFIELD Bramfield by the road SU_BGIW12 TM 4008 7268 A144 BRAMFIELD Bramfieldhall Wood by the road SU_BUCA10 TM 0054 5903 road ONEHOUSE Lower Road, 5m NW of Lodge Cottage by the road SU_BUSC03 TL 89291 67110 A143 GREAT BARTON E of The Forge, The Street on verge, back to high cut hedge SU_BUSC05 TL 91912 68913 A143 PAKENHAM E of Queach Farm by the road SU_BUSC07 TL 94258 71190 A143 IXWORTH THORPE N of roundabout with A1088 on open verge SU_BUSC08 TL 95393 72317 A143 STANTON Bury Road, Alecock's Grave on verge just W of crossroads SU_BUSC11 TL 9930 7420 A143 HEPWORTH Hepworth South Common by
    [Show full text]
  • Babergh District Council
    Draft recommendations on the new electoral arrangements for Babergh District Council Consultation response from Babergh District Council Babergh District Council (BDC) considered the Local Government Boundary Commission for England’s draft proposals for the warding arrangements in the Babergh District at its meeting on 21 November 2017, and made the following comments and observations: South Eastern Parishes Brantham & Holbrook – It was suggested that Stutton & Holbrook should be joined to form a single member ward and that Brantham & Tattingstone form a second single member ward. This would result in electorates of 2104 and 2661 respectively. It is acknowledged the Brantham & Tattingstone pairing is slightly over the 10% variation threshold from the average electorate however this proposal represents better community linkages. Capel St Mary and East Bergholt – There was general support for single member wards for these areas. Chelmondiston – The Council was keen to ensure that the Boundary Commission uses the correct spelling of Chelmondiston (not Chelmondistan) in its future publications. There were comments from some Councillors that Bentley did not share common links with the other areas included in the proposed Chelmondiston Ward, however there did not appear to be an obvious alternative grouping for Bentley without significant alteration to the scheme for the whole of the South Eastern parishes. Copdock & Washbrook - It would be more appropriate for Great and Little Wenham to either be in a ward with Capel St Mary with which the villages share a vicar and the people go to for shops and doctors etc. Or alternatively with Raydon, Holton St Mary and the other villages in that ward as they border Raydon airfield and share issues concerning Notley Enterprise Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Impact Assessment for Local Plan Site Allocations Stage 1: Strategic Appraisal
    Babergh & Mid Suffolk District Councils Heritage Impact Assessment for Local Plan Site Allocationsx Stage 1: strategic appraisal Final report Prepared by LUC October 2020 Babergh & Mid Suffolk District Councils Heritage Impact Assessment for Local Plan Site Allocations Stage 1: strategic appraisal Project Number 11013 Version Status Prepared Checked Approved Date 1. Draft for review R. Brady R. Brady S. Orr 05.05.2020 M. Statton R. Howarth F. Smith Nicholls 2. Final for issue R. Brady S. Orr S. Orr 06.05.2020 3. Updated version with additional sites F. Smith Nicholls R. Brady S. Orr 12.05.2020 4. Updated version - format and typographical K. Kaczor R. Brady S. Orr 13.10.2020 corrections Bristol Land Use Consultants Ltd Landscape Design Edinburgh Registered in England Strategic Planning & Assessment Glasgow Registered number 2549296 Development Planning London Registered office: Urban Design & Masterplanning Manchester 250 Waterloo Road Environmental Impact Assessment London SE1 8RD Landscape Planning & Assessment landuse.co.uk Landscape Management 100% recycled paper Ecology Historic Environment GIS & Visualisation Contents HIA Strategic Appraisal October 2020 Contents Cockfield 18 Wherstead 43 Eye 60 Chapter 1 Copdock 19 Woolverstone 45 Finningham 62 Introduction 1 Copdock and Washbrook 19 HAR / Opportunities 46 Great Bicett 62 Background 1 East Bergholt 22 Great Blakenham 63 Exclusions and Limitations 2 Elmsett 23 Great Finborough 64 Chapter 4 Sources 2 Glemsford 25 Assessment Tables: Mid Haughley 64 Document Structure 2 Great Cornard
    [Show full text]
  • Suffolk Coastal Local Development Framework Core Strategy - Preferred Options
    Sustainability Appraisal of the Suffolk Coastal Local Development Framework Core Strategy - Preferred Options including Development Control Policies and Strategic Housing Locations also including Appropriate Assessment – screening & scoping December 2008 Suffolk Coastal District Council is grateful to the Research & Intelligence Group, Planning and Performance Improvement, Suffolk County Council, upon whose work this appraisal is based Sustainability Appraisal 1 CONTENTS Page Non-technical summary 4 1.1 Non-technical summary 1.2 Likely significant effects of core strategy policies 1.3 Likely significant effects of development control policies 1.4 Difference the process has made 1.5 How to comment on the report Introduction 6 2. Introduction 2.1 Purpose of the report 2.2 Compliance with SEA directive and regulations 3. Method of appraisal 3.1 Approach to sustainability appraisal 3.2 Who carried out the sustainability appraisal 3.3 Who was consulted, when and how 3.4 Difficulties encountered 4. State of the environment in Suffolk Coastal 4.1 description of baseline characteristics 4.2 Predicted future baseline 4.3 Main issues and problems identified 4.4 Assumptions and limitations on information 5. Sustainability objectives 5.1 Links to other policies, plans and programmes 5.2 The SA framework 5.3 Compatibility of SA and Plan objectives 5.4 Mitigation Core Strategy policies 22 6. Appraisal of core strategy 6.1 Statutory purpose 6.2 Links with national policy & other plans 6.3 Core strategy policies and options 6.4 Significant effects 6.5 Mitigation 6.6 Uncertainties and risks 6.7 Other observations 6.9 Implementation & proposals for monitoring Development Control policies 30 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Essex County Neighbourhood Watch Association
    BRAINTREE AND DISTRICT NEIGHBOURHOOD WATCH Affiliated to Essex County Neighbourhood Watch Association which is a registered Charity No: 1168988 THE WEEKLY NEIGHBOURHOOD WATCH NEWSLETTER TWO PAGE ISSUE Monday 8th February 2021 Number: 572 Email: [email protected] THEFTS OF MOTOR VEHICLES ASHEN Ashen Road THEFTS FROM MOTOR VEHICLES Between Feb 2nd 22:00hrs and Feb 5th 07:53hrs. FEERING London Road Suspect unknown stole a white Citreon Dispatch van. Between Feb 1st 18:00hrs and Feb 2nd 05:04hrs. BRAINTREE Suspect unknown gained entry to a secure white lorry Mountbatten Road and items removed Between Feb 4th 23:00hrs and Feb 5th 09:39hrs. WITHAM Suspect unknown entered a dwelling house and stole Cherry Tree Rise car keys and removed a Kia Pro Ceed from the drive way February 3rd between 01:00hrs and 06:48hrs. in which there was £50 cash and Nat West & Barclay Suspect unknown moved a vehicle to open the back and bank cards side doors and removed tools valued at £120. Frobisher Way Allectus Wrdy Between Feb 4th 23:00hrs and Feb 5th 06:41hrs. Between Feb 1st 23:00hrs and Feb 2nd 06:54 hrs. Suspect unknown gained entry to a house by jemmying Suspect unknown broke into a black Ford Rover and the front doo and took two sets of car keys and removed stole tools valued at £500 a silver Nissan Qashqai from the drive way BRAINTREE Coggeshall Road Martens Meadow Between Jan 30th 23:40hrs and Jan 31st 06:38hrs. Between Jan 29th 18:00hrs and Jan 30th 07:37hrs. Suspect unknown gained entry to property and stole Suspect unknown broke into a vehicle and stole a wallet three sets of car keys and removed a Toyota IGo and a credit and debit cards which were used in a store Volvo V60 from the driveway purchasing items.
    [Show full text]
  • Lamarsh Village Hall Magazine Contact Bret & Rosemary Johnson 227988
    Look Out The Parish Magazine for Alphamstone, Lamarsh, Great & Little Henny Middleton, Twinstead and Wickham St Pauls May 2020 www.northhinckfordparishes.org.uk WHO TO CONTACT Team Rector: Revd. Margaret H. King [email protected] 269385 mobile - 07989 659073 Usual day off Friday Team Vicar: Revd. Gill Morgan [email protected] 584993 Usual day off Wednesday Team Curate: Revd. Paul Grover [email protected] 269223 Team Administrator: Fiona Slot [email protected] (working hours 9:00 am - 12 noon Monday, Tuesday and Thursday). 278123 Reader: Mr. Graham King 269385 The Church of St Barnabas, Alphamstone Churchwardens: Desmond Bridge 269224 Susan Langan 269482 Magazine Contact: Melinda Varcoe 269570 [email protected] The Church of St Mary the Virgin, Great & Little Henny Churchwarden: Jeremy Milbank 269720 Magazine Contact: Stella Bixley 269317 [email protected] The Church of the Holy Innocents, Lamarsh Churchwarden: Andrew Marsden 227054 Magazine Contact: Bret & Rosemary 227988 [email protected] Johnson The Church of All Saints, Middleton Churchwarden: Sue North 370558 Magazine Contact: Jude Johnson 582559 [email protected] The Church of St John the Evangelist, Twinstead Churchwardens: Elizabeth Flower 269898 Henrietta Drake 269083 Magazine Contact: Cathy Redgrove 269097 [email protected] The Church of All Saints, Wickham St. Pauls Churchwarden: Janice Rudd 269789 Magazine Contact: Susannah Goodbody 269250 [email protected] www.northhinckfordparishes.org.uk Follow us on facebook : www.facebook.com/northhinckfordparishes Magazine Editor: Magazine Advertising: Annie Broderick 01787 269152 Anthony Lyster 0800 0469 069 1 Broad Cottages, Broad Road The Coach House Wickham St Pauls Ashford Lodge Halstead.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the Greenstead Green and Halstead Rural Parish Council Meeting Held on Wednesday 13Th November 2019 at Greenstead
    Minutes of the Greenstead Green and Halstead Rural Parish Council meeting held on Wednesday 13th November 2019 at Greenstead Green Village Hall at 7.30pm These are draft minutes and yet to be agreed by the Parish Council. Present. Cllr. Bill Dixey. Cllr. Paul Foster. Chairman. Cllr. Derek Hambling Cllr. Ian Pleasance Cllr. Derek Mason. Vice-Chairman. Cllr. Pat Wickes. Amanda Degnan – Clerk to the Parish Council. District Cllr. Peter Schwier (arrived 20.45) 8 members of the public 93/19 Apologies for absence. Cllr. Chris Butler, County Cllr. Jo Beavis. 94/19 Declarations of interest. To declare any pecuniary or non-pecuniary interests in accordance with the Code of Conduct. None were declared. 95/19 (a) To approve the minutes of the previous meeting. Approved. (b) Matters arising from the minutes of the previous meeting not on the agenda. Footpath 46 – Action: Clerk to chase, Defibrillator training 2nd November 2019- only 3 people turned up, so the training obligation was not met as at least 8 people were needed. It may require another training session otherwise the funding might have to be returned to the Big Lotto Fund. Action: Cllr. Mason to pass details onto Clerk. Crocklands pavement and dip in road – Clerk had reported this to Essex County Council (ECC) Highways who are investigating it. Football practice – Clerk reported that they had found somewhere else to practice. Earls Colne Airfield Liaison Committee – Cllr. Wickes reported that there may be a meeting later this month. Item 79/19 Constantine Cottages hedge – they have been written to. Planning update: Braintree District Council (BDC) decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Braintree District Protected Lanes Assessments July 2013
    BRAINTREE DISTRICT PROTECTED LANES ASSESSMENTS July 2013 1 Braintree District Protected Lanes Assessment July 2013 2 Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 5 2 Background ............................................................................................... 5 2.1 Historic Lanes in Essex ..................................................................... 5 2.2 Protected Lanes Policy in Essex ....................................................... 6 2.3 Protected Lanes Policy in Braintree District Council .......................... 7 3 Reason for the project .............................................................................. 7 4 Protected Lanes Assessment Procedure Criteria and Scoring System .... 9 4.1 Units of Assessment .......................................................................... 9 4.2 Field Assessment ............................................................................ 10 4.2.1 Photographic Record ................................................................ 10 4.2.2 Data Fields: .............................................................................. 10 4.2.3 Diversity .................................................................................... 11 4.2.4 Historic Integrity ........................................................................ 15 4.2.5 Archaeological Potential ........................................................... 17 4.2.6 Aesthetic Value........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MEMBERS Bedfordshire Berkshire
    MEMBERS The list of all members of the Southdown Sheep Society is updated monthly. Please note that due to data protection regulations only those members who have granted their permission have full information displayed. Please note also that whilst all current members are listed, not all members have stock for sale. Please contact the Southdown Sheep Society Office ([email protected] or 01986 782251) for more information Bedfordshire Drewery Rosemary, 01326 My Dream Flock Drysdale Mrs Sarah, 00977 Littlecote Hayes Sally, 01317 Horton Hush Paula, 01075 Pen Ash Mead Terry & Lesley, Holly Bar Farm, Hollingdon, 00738 Holly Bar Soulbury, Leighton Buzzard, Beds, LU7 0DN, Tel:01525 270135, Email:[email protected] Paton Anna, Tower View Farm, 2 Ravensden Road, 01037 Lawton Wilden, Bedfordshire, MK44 2QS, Tel:01234 772627, Mobile:07917 032150, Email:[email protected] Paynter H J, 00005 Broadreed Berkshire Anstie George, Glebe, Deadmore Lane, Newtown, 01152 Glebefield Newbury, Berkshire, RG20 9DL, Tel:01635 278339, Mobile:07973 394091, Email:[email protected] Backshall Robert H, 00286 Caesars Barber Matthew, 01345 Baaaber Stanley Clare & Ian, June Rose, Benson Holme, Padworth, 01006 Mousefields Nr Reading, Berkshire, RG7 4JR, Mobile:07778 766970 / 07786 708955, Email:[email protected] Buckinghamshire Aylward Veronica, 01279 Hobbs Hill Cooper B N, 00610 Glandore Geary Debbie, 01303 Petsoe Jack Joshua, 01361 Dovecote Kempthorne C & L, 01262 Turtlefields Sparke Messrs G & M, Warren Farm, Stewkley, Bucks, 01247 Northumbria LU7 0LU, Mobile: 07968 182020, Email:[email protected] Cambridgeshire Aves William A, 00994 Hill Top Dane Mr & Mrs L C, South Villa, 46 Great Fen Road, 00529 Great Fen Soham, Ely, Cambs, CB7 5UH, Tel:01353 721216, Mobile:07548 669529, Email:[email protected] Goldsworthy Esq.
    [Show full text]
  • Essex County Council (The Commons Registration Authority) Index of Register for Deposits Made Under S31(6) Highways Act 1980
    Essex County Council (The Commons Registration Authority) Index of Register for Deposits made under s31(6) Highways Act 1980 and s15A(1) Commons Act 2006 For all enquiries about the contents of the Register please contact the: Public Rights of Way and Highway Records Manager email address: [email protected] Telephone No. 0345 603 7631 Highway Highway Commons Declaration Link to Unique Ref OS GRID Statement Statement Deeds Reg No. DISTRICT PARISH LAND DESCRIPTION POST CODES DEPOSITOR/LANDOWNER DEPOSIT DATE Expiry Date SUBMITTED REMARKS No. REFERENCES Deposit Date Deposit Date DEPOSIT (PART B) (PART D) (PART C) >Land to the west side of Canfield Road, Takeley, Bishops Christopher James Harold Philpot of Stortford TL566209, C/PW To be CM22 6QA, CM22 Boyton Hall Farmhouse, Boyton CA16 Form & 1252 Uttlesford Takeley >Land on the west side of Canfield Road, Takeley, Bishops TL564205, 11/11/2020 11/11/2020 allocated. 6TG, CM22 6ST Cross, Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 4LN Plan Stortford TL567205 on behalf of Takeley Farming LLP >Land on east side of Station Road, Takeley, Bishops Stortford >Land at Newland Fann, Roxwell, Chelmsford >Boyton Hall Fa1m, Roxwell, CM1 4LN >Mashbury Church, Mashbury TL647127, >Part ofChignal Hall and Brittons Farm, Chignal St James, TL642122, Chelmsford TL640115, >Part of Boyton Hall Faim and Newland Hall Fann, Roxwell TL638110, >Leys House, Boyton Cross, Roxwell, Chelmsford, CM I 4LP TL633100, Christopher James Harold Philpot of >4 Hill Farm Cottages, Bishops Stortford Road, Roxwell, CMI 4LJ TL626098, Roxwell, Boyton Hall Farmhouse, Boyton C/PW To be >10 to 12 (inclusive) Boyton Hall Lane, Roxwell, CM1 4LW TL647107, CM1 4LN, CM1 4LP, CA16 Form & 1251 Chelmsford Mashbury, Cross, Chelmsford, Essex, CM14 11/11/2020 11/11/2020 allocated.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Governance Review Committee AGENDA
    Community Governance Review Committee AGENDA Wednesday, 12th July 2017 at 5.00 PM Council Chamber, Braintree District Council, Causeway House, Bocking End, Braintree, CM7 9HB THIS MEETING IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC (Please note this meeting will be audio recorded) www.braintree.gov.uk Members of the Community Governance Review Committee are requested to attend this meeting to transact the business set out in the Agenda. Membership:- Councillor J Abbott Councillor Mrs J Pell Councillor P Barlow Councillor Mrs W Schmitt (Chairman) Councillor Mrs J Beavis Councillor R van Dulken Councillor Mrs D Garrod Councillor Mrs S Wilson Councillor Mrs J Money Members unable to attend the meeting are requested to forward their apologies for absence to the Governance and Members Team on 01376 552525 or email [email protected] by 3pm on the day of the meeting. A WRIGHT Acting Chief Executive Page 1 of 38 INFORMATION FOR MEMBERS - DECLARATIONS OF INTERESTS Declarations of Disclosable Pecuniary Interest, Other Pecuniary Interest or Non- Pecuniary Interest Any member with a Disclosable Pecuniary Interest, other Pecuniary Interest or Non- Pecuniary Interest must declare the nature of their interest in accordance with the Code of Conduct. Members must not participate in any discussion of the matter in which they have declared a Disclosable Pecuniary Interest or other Pecuniary Interest or participate in any vote, or further vote, taken on the matter at the meeting. In addition, the Member must withdraw from the chamber where the meeting considering the business is being held unless the Member has received a dispensation from the Monitoring Officer.
    [Show full text]