DOCSLIB.ORG

MSDC Development Control B Tabled Papers 05.08.2020 PDF 3 MB

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MSDC Development Control B Tabled Papers 05.08.2020 PDF 3 MB Public Document Pack DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE B DATE: WEDNESDAY, 5 AUGUST 2020 9.30 AM VENUE: VIRTUAL MEETING For consideration at the meeting on Wednesday, 5 AUGUST 2020, the following additional or updated papers that were unavailable when the Agenda was printed. TABLED PAPER S Page(s) 5 SA/19/25 CONFIRMATION OF THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING 3 - 8 HELD ON 8 JULY 2020 a DC/20/01677 LAND TO THE WEST OF THE FORMER BACON 9 - 132 FACTORY, ELMSWELL 1. Long Melford Appeal Decision recovered by the Secretary of State. In particular, attention is drawn to the planning balance and overall conclusions arrived at, in particular paragraphs 52 and 53 of the letter. This is considered useful given the similarities of the applications given they are both located outside of the established settlement boundary but adjacent to them and a five-year housing land supply can be demonstrated. It is worth noting the heavy material weight that both the Inspector and the Secretary of State gave towards the delivery of housing. 2. Copy of Suffolk County Council’s emerging five-year prioritised plan for cycling infrastructure particularly noting the inclusion of a route between Elmswell and Woolpit on page 92. Details of the emergent plan were put before Mid Suffolk District Council (23rd July 2020) who have determined to support the County Council’s cycling strategy. For more information about this meeting, including access arrangements and facilities for people with disabilities, please contact the Committee Officer, Committee Services on: 01449 724930 or Email: [email protected] Page 1 This page is intentionally left blank Agenda Item 5 MID SUFFOLK DISTRICT COUNCIL Minutes of the Virtual Meeting of the DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE B held on Wednesday, 8 July 2020 at 09:30am PRESENT: Councillor: Kathie Guthrie (Chair) Barry Humphreys MBE (Vice-Chair) Councillors: James Caston Peter Gould Andrew Mellen Mike Norris Andrew Stringer Rowland Warboys In attendance: Guest(s): Michael Exley Terry Moore David Barker Stephen Hubner Sebastian Blemings Officers: Area Planning Manager (JPG) Development Management Planning Officer (AS) Planning Lawyer (IDP) Governance Officer (RC) Apologies: None. 135 TO RECEIVE ANY DECLARATIONS OF PECUNIARY OR NON-PECUNIARY INTEREST BY MEMBERS 135.1 None declared. 136 DECLARATIONS OF LOBBYING 136.1 Councillor Mellen declared that he had a discussion with the Ward Member in respect of Item 7A - Application DC/19/05915. 137 DECLARATIONS OF PERSONAL SITE VISITS 137.1 Councillor Guthrie declared that she had recently driven past the site for Item 7C - Application DC/20/00263. 138 SA/19/23 CONFIRMATION OF THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD ON 28 APRIL 2020 138.1 It was RESOLVED that the Minutes of the meeting held on 28 April 2020, be confirmed as a true record. Page 3 138.2 It was noted that the Minutes would be signed at the next practicable opportunity. 139 TO RECEIVE NOTIFICATION OF PETITIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COUNCIL'S PETITION SCHEME 139.1 None received. 140 SA/19/24 SCHEDULE OF PLANNING APPLICATIONS 140.1 Prior to the commencement of the meeting, the Chair welcomed everyone to the virtual meeting, outlined the procedure and etiquette to be followed and introduced the officers present. 140.2 It was noted that Item 7B – DC/19/05949 had been withdrawn by officers with the agreement of the Chair and would not be considered at this meeting. In accordance with the Council’s procedure for public speaking on planning applications, representations were made as detailed below: Application No. Representations from DC/19/05915 Michael Exley (Parish Council Representative) Terry Moore (Objector) David Barker (Applicant) Cllr Andrew Stringer (Ward Member) DC/20/00263 Stephen Hubner (Parish Council Representative) Sebastian Blemings (Agent) Cllr Peter Gould (Ward Member) 141 DC/19/05915 LAND NORTH EAST OF, CHAPEL ROAD, MENDLESHAM, SUFFOLK 141.1 Item 7A Application: DC/19/05915 Proposal: Outline Application – Erection of 20 dwellings and creation of vehicular access Site Location: MENDLESHAM – Land north east of Chapel Road Applicant: Mr & Mrs Bauly 141.2 The Case Officer presented the application to the Committee, outlining the proposal before Members, the layout of the site, and the officer recommendation of approval. 141.3 The Case Officer and the Area Planning Manager responded to Members’ questions on issues including: changes made to the application since the Page 4 previous refusal, footpath link to the village, location of the floodplain, and the status of the emerging and adopted Mendlesham Neighbourhood Plans. 141.4 Members considered the representation from Michael Exley who spoke on behalf of the Parish Council. 141.5 Members considered the representation from Terry Moore who spoke as an Objector. 141.6 The Objector responded to Members’ questions on issues including: the footpath link and flooding. 141.7 Members considered the representation from David Barker who spoke as the Applicant. 141.8 The Applicant and his consultant responded to Members’ questions on issues including: the footpath link and confirmation that the site is outside the floodplain. 141.9 Members considered the representation from the Ward Member, Councillor Andrew Stringer. 141.10 The Ward Member responded to Members’ questions on issues including: the progress of the emerging Mendlesham Neighbourhood Plan. 141.11 Members debated the application on issues including: the footpath link, the floodplain, and the status of the adopted and the emerging Mendlesham Neighbourhood Plans. 141.12 Councillor Barry Humphreys proposed that the application be approved as detailed in the officer recommendation. Councillor James Caston seconded the Motion. 141.13 The vote was taken by roll call, and by 4 votes to 3 the Motion was carried. 141.14 It was RESOLVED: (1) That subject to the prior agreement of a Section 106 Planning Obligation on appropriate terms to the satisfaction of the Chief Planning Officer to secure: - Provision, management and maintenance of Public Open Space; - 35% onsite delivery of Affordable housing provision; - Financial contribution towards secondary School Pupils’ transport. (2) The Chief Planning Officer be authorised to Grant Outline Planning Permission upon completion of the legal agreement in Resolution (1) above, subject to conditions as summarised below and those as may be deemed necessary by the Chief Planning Officer: Page 5 - Standard - Outline Time Limit Condition and Time Limit for Submission of Reserved Matters - Standard - Reserved Matters Condition - Standard - Approved Plans and Documents Condition - Those required by SCC – Archaeology as recommended - Those required by the Local Lead Flood Authority as recommended - Those required by the Local Highways Authority as recommended - Sustainability measures to be implemented as proposed and agreed - Reserved matters to detail Bin Presentation Points - Reserved matters to propose road layout suitable for Refuse and Recycling collection Vehicles - Those required by Environmental Protection Officers during construction - Fire Hydrant provision details - Ecology Mitigation and Enhancement Measures (Including Hedgehog Fencing) - Lighting Scheme - Biodiversity - Withdrawal of PD Rights - Phasing Plan Concurrently with Reserved Matters (3) And the following informative notes as summarised and those as may be deemed necessary: • Pro active working statement • SCC Highways notes • Support for sustainable development principles • Contaminated Land Note • Ecology / Biodiversity Note • Public Rights of Way Responsibilities Note (4) That in the event of the Planning obligations or requirements referred to in Resolution (1) above not being secured and/or not secured within 6 months that the Chief Planning Officer be authorised to refuse the application on appropriate grounds. 142 DC/19/05949 LAND TO THE NORTH WEST OF, MASON COURT (KNOWN AS OLD ENGINE MEADOW), MENDLESHAM - ITEM WITHDRAWN BY OFFICERS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE MEETING 142.1 The Area Planning Manager advised Members that the application had been withdrawn by Officers prior to the Committee to consider alternative plans received for this application. 143 DC/20/00263 LAND AT REAR OF CEDAR COTTAGE, THE STREET, OCCOLD, SUFFOLK 143.1 The Committee adjourned for a short comfort break between 11:45am and 12:00pm prior to consideration of Application DC/20/00263. Page 6 143.2 Item 7C Application: DC/20/00263 Proposal: Full Application – Erection of 1 No. dwelling with attached garage Site Location: OCCOLD – Land at rear of Cedar Cottage, The Street Applicant: Hartbuild Ltd 143.3 The Area Planning Manager presented the application to the Committee, outlining the proposal before Members, the layout of the site, and the officer recommendation of approval. 143.4 The Area Planning Manager responded to Members’ questions on issues including: the height of the proposed dwelling and confirmation that the application site is outside the draft local plan boundary. 143.5 Members considered the representation from Stephen Hubner who spoke on behalf of the Parish Council. 143.6 Members considered the representation from Sebastian Blemings who spoke as the Agent. 143.7 The Agent responded to Members’ questions on issues including: landscaping and the size of the proposed dwelling. 143.8 Members considered the representation from the Ward Member, Councillor Peter Gould. 143.9 Members debated the application on issues including: the size, height and dominance of the proposed dwelling in relation to the existing property, development
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Joint Babergh and Mid Suffolk District Council Landscape Guidance August 2015
    Joint Babergh and Mid Suffolk District Council Landscape Guidance August 2015 Joint Babergh and Mid Suffolk District Council Landscape Guidance 2015 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The landscape of Babergh and Mid Suffolk (South and North Suffolk) is acknowledged as being attractive and an important part of why people choose to live and work here. However current pressures for development in the countryside, and the changing agricultural and recreational practices and pressures, are resulting in changes that in some instances have been damaging to the local character and distinctiveness of the landscape. 1.1.1 Some development is necessary within the countryside, in order to promote a sustainable prosperous and vibrant rural economy. However, such development would be counterproductive if it were to harm the quality of the countryside/landscape it is set within and therefore the quality of life benefits, in terms of health and wellbeing that come from a rural landscape in good condition.1 1.1.2 The Council takes the view that there is a need to safeguard the character of both districts countryside by ensuring new development integrates positively with the existing character. Therefore, a Landscape Guidance has been produced to outline the main elements of the existing character and to outline broad principles that all development in the countryside will be required to follow. 1.1.3 Well designed and appropriately located development in the countryside can capture the benefits of sustainable economic development whilst still retaining and enhancing valuable landscape characteristics, which are so important to Babergh and Mid Suffolk. 1.1.4 The protection and enhancement of both districts landscape is essential not only for the intrinsic aesthetic and historic value that supports tourism and the economy for the area but also to maintain the quality of life for the communities that live in the countryside.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Qualities of the Dedham Vale AONB Evaluation of Area Between Bures and Sudbury
    Special Qualities of the Dedham Vale AONB Evaluation of Area Between Bures and Sudbury Final Report July 2016 Alison Farmer Associates 29 Montague Road Cambridge CB4 1BU 01223 461444 [email protected] In association with Julie Martin Associates and Countryscape 2 Contents 1: Introduction .................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Appointment............................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Background and Scope of Work.............................................................................. 3 1.3 Natural England Guidance on Assessing Landscapes for Designation ................... 5 1.4 Methodology and Approach to the Review .............................................................. 6 1.5 Format of Report ..................................................................................................... 7 2: The Evaluation Area ...................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Landscape Character Assessments as a Framework ............................................. 8 2.2 Defining and Reviewing the Evaluation Area Extent ................................................ 9 3: Designation History ..................................................................................................... 10 3.1 References to the Wider Stour Valley in the Designation of the AONB ................. 10 3.2 Countryside Commission Designation
    [Show full text]
  • Project Title
    Babergh District Council Local Development Framework Draft Core Strategy (Preferred Options) Sustainability Appraisal Report Appendices Part III – Broad Locations and Preferred Policies Stage June 2010 Babergh District Council Local Development Framework: Core Strategy Sustainability Appraisal Report Babergh District Council Local Development Framework Core Strategy Sustainability Appraisal Report Appendices Part III – Broad Locations and Preferred Policies Stage June 2010 Notice This report was produced by Atkins for Babergh District Council for the specific purpose of the Core Strategy Development Plan Document Sustainability Appraisal. This report may not be used by any person other than Babergh District Council without Babergh District Council's express permission. In any event, Atkins accepts no liability for any costs, liabilities or losses arising as a result of the use of or reliance upon the contents of this report by any person other than Babergh District Council. Document History JOB NUMBER: 5088144 DOCUMENT REF: Babergh Core Strategy SAR_V2.2 Appendices Part III.doc 2 Final CS/OP/SM OP CW CW 31.05.10 1 Draft for Comment CS/OP/SM OP AG 12.04.10 Revision Purpose Description Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date Babergh District Council Local Development Framework: Core Strategy Sustainability Appraisal Report Babergh District Council Local Development Framework: Core Strategy Sustainability Appraisal Report Contents Appendices Part III Appendix A - Broad Locations Assessment 6 A.1 Broad Locations Assessment Tables 7 Appendix
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Landscape Study of East Bergholt and the Cultural Legacy of John Constable
    Historic Landscape Study of East Bergholt and the Cultural Legacy of John Constable On behalf of East Bergholt Parish Council November 2020 | Project Ref 641 Project Number: 641 Authored by: Claire Browne / Anne Johnson Approved by: Jonathan Edis Date: November 2020 Version: Version 4 Document version M:\LC\Projects\Projects\641 East Bergholt\Reports\V4 Historic Landscape Study of East Bergholt | 2 Executive Summary A historic landscape study of East Bergholt • Most importantly, this study assesses has been undertaken to inform the the landscape sensitivity of key Neighbourhood Plan. The study considers areas around East Bergholt, from a the archaeological dimension of the heritage and cultural point of view. village that stretches back into prehistory, It warns of threats of potential the time depth of the landscape around damage by inappropriate large scale the village documented in Constable’s development, despite Conservation paintings and the modern heritage and Area and AONB status. landscape context of the village. The study has identified the following areas A unique approach and methodology has of archaeological and landscape sensitivity: been used in this study to determine landscape value. It considers the • The former heathland north of the significance of East Bergholt to Constable’s village has archaeological potential. legacy as well as the presence of archaeological and heritage assets. • The historic landscape pattern is still The key findings of the report are as evident north of the village and is follows: highly susceptible to visual impacts. • East Bergholt is a very special English village as the birthplace of the • The former East Bergholt Common / internationally renowned painter John Heath at the centre of the village is Constable, and was his inspiration sensitive to encroachment and erosion throughout his life.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee Report
    Committee Report Item No: 1 Reference: B/16/00777 Case Officer: Gemma Pannell Description of Development: Erection of 71 residential dwellings (including market and affordable homes), garages, parking, vehicular access (with Bull Lane), estate roads, public open space, play areas, landscaping, drainage and other infrastructure works. Location: Land on the south side of, Bull Lane, Long Melford Parish: Long Melford Ward: Long Melford Ward Member/s: Cllr. R. Kemp & Cllr. J. Nunn Site Area: 3.1 Conservation Area: Not in Conservation Area Listed Buildings: Within the vicinity of the site: Melford Hall (Grade I) Melford Hall Registered Park and Garden (Grade II*) Bull Lane Farm (Grade II Listed) Barn and Outbuildings to Bull Lane Farmhouse (Grade II Listed) 24 Bull Lane (Grade II Listed) The Old Cottage (Grade II) Received: 07/06/2016 Expiry Date: 16/02/2017 Application Type: Full Planning Application Development Type: Smallscale Major Dwellings Environmental Impact Assessment: N/A Applicant: Hopkins Homes Limited Agent: Bidwells LLP DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION The application, plans and documents submitted by the applicant can be viewed online at https://planning.babergh.gov.uk/online- applications/search.do?action=simple&searchType=Application under the application reference noted above. This includes a full copy of all of the statutory and third party consultation responses. SUMMARY The proposal has been assessed with regard to section 38 (6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, which requires the application to be determined in accordance with the Council’s development plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise. The Council’s adopted development plan policies, the National Planning Policy Framework and all other material considerations have therefore been fully considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Suffolk Local Access Forum
    Suffolk Local Access Forum Title: Agenda Meeting Date: 12 April 2012 Author/Contact: Jill Christley Venue: Walberswick Village Hall Paper Number 1. 3.00 Welcome, apologies and housekeeping 2. Minutes of previous meeting LAF 12/07 3. Declaration of interest 4. 3.10 Lynda Foster Presentation Lead Adviser (Essex and Suffolk) People and Partnerships, Natural England 5. 3.40 Coastal Guidance for Land Managers – Total LAF 12/08 Environment 6. 3.55 National LAF Conference LAF 12/09 7. 4.05 Babergh Green Infrastructure Framework LAF 12/10 8. 4.10 Independent Forestry Panel – visit to East Anglia LAF 12/11 9. 4.25 A11 Underpass LAF 12/12 10. 4.35 Correspondence / updates: • Letter from Richard Benyon MP, Minister for LAF 12/13 Natural Environment and Fisheries • Rights of Way and Rail Crossings – update LAF 12/14 • Suffolk and Norfolk Local Nature LAF 12/15 Partnership 11. 4.50 Any Other Business 12. 4.55 Public question time 13. 5.00 Dates & Venues of Future Meetings LAF 12/07 Suffolk Local Access Forum Title: Minutes of meeting held in SALC meeting room, Claydon on 12 January 2012 Meeting Date: 12 April 2012 Author/Contact: Jill Christley Venue: Walberswick Village Hall. 1. Welcome, apologies and housekeeping. Present: Melinda Appleby (MA), David Barker (DB), Bryan Collen (Chairman) (BC), Barry Hall (BH), Margaret Hancock (MH), Ann Langley (AL), Sandy Martin (SM), Alan Moore (AM), Mary Norden (MN), Monica Pipe (MP), Norman Southgate (NS), Mike Taylor (MT), John Wayman (JW), Anthony Wright (AWr). SCC Officers Present: Jill Christley (minutes), David Falk (DF), Jackie Gillis (JG), Steve Kerr (SK), Alan Thorndyke (AT), Andrew Woodin (AW).
    [Show full text]
  • SLHC Calendar Spring 2020
    SUFFOLK LOCAL HISTORY COUNCIL EVENTS 7 March 2020 Societies Day Blackbourne Community Centre Elmswell Autumn 2020 Autumn Starts at 9.45am (doors open 9.00am) SEE advert below — 25 April 2020 Recorders Day Blackbourne Community Centre Elmswell 10.00am (doors open 9.30am) Spring 2020 6 June 2020 Focus on...Bury St Edmunds and its houses, Calendar How old is that house? (application form printed in newsletter) 26 September 2020 Focus on...The Ipswich Waterfront (application form printed in newsletter) Early notifications: 10 October 2020 - Peter Northeast Conference 14 November 2020 - Annual General Meeting speaker and venue tbc Benefits of Membership: · a twice yearly journal, the Suffolk Review, which publishes current research on Suffolk local history; · a twice yearly Newsletter keeping members in touch with the local history scene across the county of Suffolk; · a twice yearly Calendar of Events listing lec- tures, courses and exhibitions of interest to lo- Founded in 1953, the Suffolk Local History cal historians; Council (SLHC) is a registered educational · an annual lecture on a topic of recent historical charity, financed by its members, that exists research at our AGM held each November; to promote the study of local history and to · an annual local history conference featuring encourage historical research in the county of talks and presentations of recent historical re- Suffolk. SLHC also supports a network of lo- search; cal history recorders in towns and villages · access to Day Meetings hosted by our member throughout the county. Membership is open societies to learn more about their area of Suf- to individuals, local history societies, historical folk; groups and museums.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Parish Council Meeting 02/07/2020 – Approved Minutes
    LONG MELFORD PARISH COUNCIL The Parish Offices, Cordell Road, Long Melford, Suffolk CO10 9EH Tel: 01787 378084 Email: [email protected] Full Parish Council Minutes of Meeting Meeting called for 7:30pm, Thursday 2nd July 2020 Location Conducted by remote videoconferencing due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Councillors present I. Bartlett, M. Clayton, R. Delderfield, J. Ewbank, R. Kemp, L. Malvisi, C. Michette, R. Michette, J. Nunn (Chair), L. Tipper, D. Watts, J. Watts Councillors absent J. Lines Also attending D. Lovelock (Parish Clerk) The Chair opened the meeting at 7:33pm. The following Agenda items were addressed. 20/07-1 Apologies for Absence The Clerk advised that no apologies for absence had been received. 20/07-2 Declarations of Interest and Requests for Dispensation No declarations of interest were made by Councillors. The Clerk advised that no requests for dispensation had been received. 20/07-3 Confirmation of the Accuracy of Minutes Cllr. D. Watts noted that while the minutes were accurate, there had been a proposal at the 4th June meeting to consider a civic award during the current meeting but it was not on the Agenda. Cllr. Bartlett explained that it had subsequently been established that civic awards had to be dealt with under the Council's Civic Awards Policy. The Clerk confirmed this to be the case, and said that he would circulate a copy of the Policy and award nomination forms to Councillors within the next few days. Resolved – That the minutes for the Full Parish Council Meeting held on 4th June 2020 be accepted and signed by the Chair as providing an accurate record.
    [Show full text]
  • Display PDF in Separate
    rsTPsA W A T o c L S r RELOCATION OF SUFFOLK WATER COMPANY BOREHOLE D SECCOMBE HYDROGEOLOGIST NATIONAL RIVERS AUTHORITY 13 August 1992 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................... 1 2. Description of problem ............................................... 1 3. Licence requirements of new s i t e ..................................... 2 4. Proposed locations ................................................... 3 Dairy Farm, North Lopham ......................................... 3 Lovers Lane, Garboldisham ......................................... 5 Yaxley Crag borehole 3 A 2 ......................................... 7 Cranley borehole 10A ................... .......... ..... 8 5. Catchment water balances ............................................. 9 R. Lt O u s e ........................................................ 9 R. D o v e ............................................................ H 6. Areas of Environmental interest .................................... 12 7. Conclusion............................................................ 14 8. Recommendations..................................................... 15 This book is due for return on or before the last date shown below. Don G>*(1 W*II L»d.. London. N.21 C»l. No. 1208 DG 02342/71 List of Figures Figure 1 - Monthly abstraction data for two boreholes adjacent to Redgrave F e n ........................................................16 Figure 2 - Location for cross-section of R. Lt. O u s e ................. 17 Figure 3 - Geological
    [Show full text]
  • Recovered Appeal: Land Off Station Road, Long Melford, Suffolk (Ref: 3214377
    Our ref: APP/D3505/W/18/3214377 Stuart Carvel Your ref: n/a Gladman Developments Ltd Gladman House Alexandria Way Congleton Cheshire 1 April 2020 CW12 1LB Dear Sir, TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 – SECTION 78 APPEAL MADE BY GLADMAN DEVELOPMENTS LTD LAND OFF STATION ROAD, LONG MELFORD, SUFFOLK APPLICATION REF: DC/18/00606 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to say that consideration has been given to the report of Kenneth Stone BSc Hons DipTP MRTPI, who held a public inquiry between 25 June 2019 and 2 July 2019 into your appeal against the failure of Babergh District Council to determine your application for outline planning permission for the erection of up to 150 dwellings with public open space, landscaping and sustainable drainage system (SuDS), and vehicular access point from Station Road, with all matters reserved except means of access, in accordance with application ref: DC/18/00606, dated 8 February 2018. 2. On 25 June 2019, this appeal was recovered for the Secretary of State's determination, in pursuance of section 79 of, and paragraph 3 of Schedule 6 to, the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. Inspector’s recommendation and summary of the decision 3. The Inspector recommended that the appeal be allowed and planning permission granted, subject to conditions. 4. For the reasons given below, the Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector’s conclusions, except where stated, and agrees with his recommendation. He has decided to allow the appeal and grant planning permission. 5. A copy of the Inspector’s report (IR) is enclosed.
    [Show full text]
  • Dc/21/02319 Land to the East Of, Station Road, Long Melford, Suffolk
    Committee Report Item No: 6B Reference: DC/21/02319 Case Officer: Katherine Hale Ward: Long Melford Ward Member/s: Cllr John Nunn. Cllr Elisabeth Malvisi RECOMMENDATION – GRANT PLANNING PERMISSION WITH CONDITIONS Description of Development Submission of Details (Reserved Matters) and Discharge of Conditions 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, 16, 21, 22 and 24 under Outline Planning Permission DC/18/00606. Appearance, Landscaping, Layout and Scale for the erection of 150no dwellings and associated infrastructure. Members are advised that the conditions referred to relate to: Condition 5: Open Market Housing Mix Condition 7: Biodiversity Enhancement Strategy for Protected and Priority Species Condition 9: Construction Management Plan Condition 10: Construction Environmental Management Plan Condition 11: Construction Surface Water Management Plan Condition 13: Noise and Vibration Protection Scheme Condition 16: Surface Water Drainage Condition 21: Energy Assessment Condition 22: Archaeological WSI Condition 24: Scheme to Direct Existing High Voltage Overhead Lines NB – Whilst these conditions do overlap with the Reserved Matters, the discharge of conditions was delegated to Officers under Outline application DC/18/00606. Location Land To The East Of, Station Road, Long Melford, Suffolk CO10 9HP Expiry Date: 20/07/2021 Application Type: RES - Reserved Matters Development Type: Major Small Scale - Dwellings Applicant: Bloor Homes Agent: Mr James Bailey Parish: Long Melford Site Area: 8.23 hectares Density of Development: Gross Density (Total Site): 18.22
    [Show full text]
  • Route Options Consultations Appendices Part 2
    The result of this consultation will help decide whether or not this project continues. We want you to be able to make an informed response to this consultation. This booklet explains where the routes may be, where you can find more information, and how you can let us know what you think using our questionnaire. Why we are asking? We want to ask the local community what they think about the idea and understand how the routes may effect people. 3 The project is in the early stages and no final decisions have been made yet. Work would need to be done to decide on the right route, and get planning permission and funding before the route can be built. There will be another consultation with more information if the project progresses. The earliest a new road could be built would be 2027. The timeline on the next page shows the steps to construction. 4 Ipswich Northern Route timeline Options assessment We looked at the possible routes Consultation This is where we are now - asking the public what they think of the route options. Strategic Outline Business Case We will look at how the new Preferred route selected road can help us meet our business case The preferred route is chosen Outline Business Case We will put together our Consultation business case We will go back to people and ask them what they think Planning/Consents We will apply to get the approval to build the road Full Business Case We will present our business case to government and Construction council leaders The building of the new road will begin 5 We need to think carefully about what Suffolk needs to grow, and support the businesses and the people who already live and work here.
    [Show full text]