DOCSLIB.ORG

Suffolk Local Access Forum

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Suffolk Local Access Forum Suffolk Local Access Forum Title: Agenda Meeting Date: 20 October 2011 Author/Contact: Jill Christley Venue: Assington Village Hall, The Street, Assington, CO10 5LW Paper Number 1. 3.00 Welcome, apologies and housekeeping 2. Minutes of previous meeting LAF 11/23 3. Declaration of interest 4. 3.10 Local Nature Partnerships Presentation Genevieve Broad, Biodiversity Officer Suffolk Biodiversity Partnership Local Nature Partnerships – summary LAF 11/24 5. Future of the Public Forest Estate SLAF meeting with Norfolk LAF LAF 11/25 SLAF invitation to Independent Panel on Forestry LAF 11/26 SCC response to Call for Views LAF 11/27 6. SLAF Annual Report 2010/11 LAF 11/28 SLAF Annual Report feedback LAF 11/29 NE LAF Annual Report LAF 11/30 7. SCC budget consultation LAF 11/31 8. SCC Countryside Sites (Dedication of Public LAF 11/32 Rights of Way) – Progress Report 9. Rights of Way Road and Rail Crossings – Update LAF 11/33 A11 Dualling Between Fiveways and Thetford 10. Ipswich Fit for the 21st Century LAF 11/34 Ipswich Waterfront Traffic Management LAF 11/35 11. Correspondence • NE review of OA restrictions LAF 11/36 • National Planning Policy Framework LAF 11/37 • DEFRA consultation on registration of town Verbal and village greens • Management of Commons LAF 11/38 • LAF Chair and Vice Chair meeting Verbal • Herts LAF case study LAF 11/39 • East of England LAF meeting dates LAF 11/40 12. 4.50 Any Other Business 13. 4.55 Public question time 14. 5.00 Dates & Venues of Future Meetings LAF 11/23 Suffolk Local Access Forum Title: Minutes of meeting held in Aspall Room, Kerrison Conference Centre, Stoke Road, Thorndon on 14 July 2011 Meeting Date: 20 October 2011 Author/Contact: Jill Christley Venue: Assington Village Hall, The Street, Assington, CO10 5LW 1. Welcome, apologies and housekeeping. Present: Melinda Appleby (MA), Bryan Collen (Chairman) (BC), Barry Hall (BH), Margaret Hancock (MH), Gordon Merfield (GM), Monica Pipe (MP), Norman Southgate (NS), John Wayman (JW), Anthony Wright (AWr). SCC Officers Present: Beth Barham (minutes), David Falk (DF), Andrew Woodin (AW). Apologies – Lynda Foster (Natural England), David Barker, Ann Langley, Sandy Martin, Mary Norden, Alan Moore, Jane Storey, Mike Taylor. 2. Minutes of previous meeting The minutes of the previous meeting were agreed to be an accurate record. 3. Declaration of interest AWr declared interest in Ipswich Chord where Sustrans are land owners. 4. Natural England (NE) LAF 11/13 and 11/14 refer. AW covered papers and summarised Natural Environment White Paper which concerns how communities can connect better with their natural environment and be involved, appreciate and value the countryside more. In April 2013 an SCC Director of Public Health should be in place to influence local services including accessibility to the countryside. BC commented that nature was often robust giving the example of airfields and the importance of farming in countryside management, which was not recognised in previous White Papers. Under LAF 11/14, DF advised that discussions were being held between SCC, NCC, Wildlife Trusts, Brecks Partnership, AONBs and Biodiversity Partnerships to establish a Norfolk- Suffolk Local Nature Partnership (LNP). The LNP should include at least one representative from LAFs. DF advised that Coastal Access had commenced in Norfolk with a desk exercise in progress. No date had been set yet by Natural England for Coastal Access to commence in Suffolk. ACTION SLAF to request representation on LNP. LAF 11/23 5. Independent Panel on Forestry (IPF) Concern was raised that membership of the panel was mostly land managers and may not include all access users. MA praised the letter on behalf of SLAF to the Independent Panel on Forestry as it may have influenced their decision on where to visit, but highlighted the need for a follow-up letter. MA also mentioned wood fuel project in East Anglia and asked if this could be included in the letter. JW asked if more recent figures on visitor numbers than those presented in the letter were available. AW reviewed the IPF press release and highlighted the intention of the panel to visit a forest in East Anglia. It was agreed that the panel should be invited to visit Thetford Forest as it straddles Suffolk and Norfolk allowing joint representation from SLAF and NLAF. DF highlighted importance of connectivity between Thetford Forest and other areas, including areas of Open Access land, Elveden and King’s Forest. ACTION Confirm that IPF received letter from SLAF. ACTION SLAF to meet NLAF to discuss joint working on this issue. ACTION SLAF to write to IPF to confirm visit to Thetford Forest and invite them to meet representatives of SLAF and NLAF. 6. Divestment LAF11/20 refers. Countryside Sites AW briefed SLAF on divestment of countryside sites highlighting that emphasis had been given to protecting access as follows: • Clare Country Park – dedicate rights of way on 4 routes including former railway line • Lavenham / Long Melford – dedicate rights of way on former railway lines. There had been concern over liability for maintenance of structures. It had been confimed that responsibility for maintenance of bridges would remain with SCC. • Sudbury – to have a dedicated cycle path. • Greyfriars – path to be dedicated. • Thorpeness – dropped RoW along shingle shore. • Iken/Nacton – dedications of OA land. BH queried how SCC sites would be managed if there is no funding. AW confirmed funding was secured to operate sites until they were disposed. GM queried maintenance of commons (citing Knoddishall Common) by Suffolk Coastal District Council and the position of local community to take on their management. MP mentioned a similar issue at Blaxhall Common. Public Rights of Way AW confirmed reduction in the rights of way budget with alternative options to deliver targets being explored with detailed discussions being held with Eye Town Council and other parishes. NS confirmed off-road driving groups had offered assistance but need to know SCC’s standards to work best in partnership and concern was expressed generally about H&S, training, provision of tools, guidance and legal issues. MA suggested contacting parishes to advise what they could do, including minor vegetation clearance on rights of way and BH suggested using SALC and PC newsletters for communication. LAF 11/23 MA highlighted change in culture was needed to encourage communities and individuals to improve their environment. GM agreed the community approach has been lost. AWr advised that Sustrans carry out maintenance with permission of land owners and stressed the importance of covering health and safety and proper use of tools. BC felt it was important for volunteering to be firmly under the control of SCC. ACTION AW to consider the most appropriate way to engage more comprehensively with parishes. ACTION AW to raise management of commons with SCDC. 7. SLAF Annual Report to Cabinet LAF 10/25 refers. DF confirmed that the Annual Report covered the period August to July. BC highlighted the importance of investing in countryside access to address health issues and safeguard access. Key issues were agreed as: • A11 dualling • Future of forestry • Divestment of countryside sites • Divestment of countryside access • Threat to ROW budgets • Severance of rights of way over railways and trunk roads • HLS • Rail crossings 8. A11 AW advised that a meeting had been held on 30 June 2011 and works were due to commence in 2012 and scheduled to last 2 years. Concern was raised over the budget pressures for the scheme, which could include reducing the height of the underpass from 3.7m to 2.7m (resulting in horse riders having to dismount). Concern was also raised over detour of the footpath at Icklingham to the B1112 underpass and HA’s wish to leave this as a natural surface (grass) path without any surfacing. AWr commented on similarities with situation at Bury St Edmunds where the path was left as shingle surface. On a related subject of Network Rail crossing points, SLAF supported SCC’s position to ensure safe crossings, and the closure of a right of way without replacement was a last resort and only if the path was a very low priority. 9. Correspondence / Update Ipswich Chord and other rail issues DF summarised LAF11/21 and LAF11/22 highlighting safety aspect of a tunnel on this route and the possible impact of anti-social behaviour it might create AWr outlined discussion of ownership and management of the sluice and inclusion of a ramp to enhance access. Brantham rail crossings AW discussed a possible closure of a route by Network Rail (NWR) at a crossing at Brantham. Despite being a popular walk NWR had suggested it was unsafe despite lack of maintenance LAF 11/23 of the path bank and furniture. Alternatives to closure including improvements of steps, control measures or a diversion needed to be considered. BC queried if there was a statutory obligation of NWR to maintain routes. SLAF will support SCC recommendations LTP3 DF advised that LTP3 would be implemented next year and draft documents were available online Coastal AW advised SLAF on development of guidance for land managers where there is a risk of flooding and breaching of sea walls. This should be available at a later meeting. AW described the situation in Orford where the river wall will be raised by adding soil to the existing bank. This will raise the river wall height by approximately 2ft. The works would be carried out in the autumn. The scheme was considerably less expensive than other options, although the scheme design may not be appropriate in all situations. Regional LAFs DF advised that Anna Mangini was the new regional LAF co-ordinator. BH requested copy of meeting notes of LAF regional conference held in Ely 15th March 2011.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Project Title
    Babergh District Council Local Development Framework Draft Core Strategy (Preferred Options) Sustainability Appraisal Report Appendices Part III – Broad Locations and Preferred Policies Stage June 2010 Babergh District Council Local Development Framework: Core Strategy Sustainability Appraisal Report Babergh District Council Local Development Framework Core Strategy Sustainability Appraisal Report Appendices Part III – Broad Locations and Preferred Policies Stage June 2010 Notice This report was produced by Atkins for Babergh District Council for the specific purpose of the Core Strategy Development Plan Document Sustainability Appraisal. This report may not be used by any person other than Babergh District Council without Babergh District Council's express permission. In any event, Atkins accepts no liability for any costs, liabilities or losses arising as a result of the use of or reliance upon the contents of this report by any person other than Babergh District Council. Document History JOB NUMBER: 5088144 DOCUMENT REF: Babergh Core Strategy SAR_V2.2 Appendices Part III.doc 2 Final CS/OP/SM OP CW CW 31.05.10 1 Draft for Comment CS/OP/SM OP AG 12.04.10 Revision Purpose Description Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date Babergh District Council Local Development Framework: Core Strategy Sustainability Appraisal Report Babergh District Council Local Development Framework: Core Strategy Sustainability Appraisal Report Contents Appendices Part III Appendix A - Broad Locations Assessment 6 A.1 Broad Locations Assessment Tables 7 Appendix
    [Show full text]
  • Committee Report
    Committee Report Item No: 1 Reference: B/16/00777 Case Officer: Gemma Pannell Description of Development: Erection of 71 residential dwellings (including market and affordable homes), garages, parking, vehicular access (with Bull Lane), estate roads, public open space, play areas, landscaping, drainage and other infrastructure works. Location: Land on the south side of, Bull Lane, Long Melford Parish: Long Melford Ward: Long Melford Ward Member/s: Cllr. R. Kemp & Cllr. J. Nunn Site Area: 3.1 Conservation Area: Not in Conservation Area Listed Buildings: Within the vicinity of the site: Melford Hall (Grade I) Melford Hall Registered Park and Garden (Grade II*) Bull Lane Farm (Grade II Listed) Barn and Outbuildings to Bull Lane Farmhouse (Grade II Listed) 24 Bull Lane (Grade II Listed) The Old Cottage (Grade II) Received: 07/06/2016 Expiry Date: 16/02/2017 Application Type: Full Planning Application Development Type: Smallscale Major Dwellings Environmental Impact Assessment: N/A Applicant: Hopkins Homes Limited Agent: Bidwells LLP DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION The application, plans and documents submitted by the applicant can be viewed online at https://planning.babergh.gov.uk/online- applications/search.do?action=simple&searchType=Application under the application reference noted above. This includes a full copy of all of the statutory and third party consultation responses. SUMMARY The proposal has been assessed with regard to section 38 (6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, which requires the application to be determined in accordance with the Council’s development plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise. The Council’s adopted development plan policies, the National Planning Policy Framework and all other material considerations have therefore been fully considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Suffolk Local Access Forum
    Suffolk Local Access Forum Title: Agenda Meeting Date: 12 April 2012 Author/Contact: Jill Christley Venue: Walberswick Village Hall Paper Number 1. 3.00 Welcome, apologies and housekeeping 2. Minutes of previous meeting LAF 12/07 3. Declaration of interest 4. 3.10 Lynda Foster Presentation Lead Adviser (Essex and Suffolk) People and Partnerships, Natural England 5. 3.40 Coastal Guidance for Land Managers – Total LAF 12/08 Environment 6. 3.55 National LAF Conference LAF 12/09 7. 4.05 Babergh Green Infrastructure Framework LAF 12/10 8. 4.10 Independent Forestry Panel – visit to East Anglia LAF 12/11 9. 4.25 A11 Underpass LAF 12/12 10. 4.35 Correspondence / updates: • Letter from Richard Benyon MP, Minister for LAF 12/13 Natural Environment and Fisheries • Rights of Way and Rail Crossings – update LAF 12/14 • Suffolk and Norfolk Local Nature LAF 12/15 Partnership 11. 4.50 Any Other Business 12. 4.55 Public question time 13. 5.00 Dates & Venues of Future Meetings LAF 12/07 Suffolk Local Access Forum Title: Minutes of meeting held in SALC meeting room, Claydon on 12 January 2012 Meeting Date: 12 April 2012 Author/Contact: Jill Christley Venue: Walberswick Village Hall. 1. Welcome, apologies and housekeeping. Present: Melinda Appleby (MA), David Barker (DB), Bryan Collen (Chairman) (BC), Barry Hall (BH), Margaret Hancock (MH), Ann Langley (AL), Sandy Martin (SM), Alan Moore (AM), Mary Norden (MN), Monica Pipe (MP), Norman Southgate (NS), Mike Taylor (MT), John Wayman (JW), Anthony Wright (AWr). SCC Officers Present: Jill Christley (minutes), David Falk (DF), Jackie Gillis (JG), Steve Kerr (SK), Alan Thorndyke (AT), Andrew Woodin (AW).
    [Show full text]
  • Full Parish Council Meeting 02/07/2020 – Approved Minutes
    LONG MELFORD PARISH COUNCIL The Parish Offices, Cordell Road, Long Melford, Suffolk CO10 9EH Tel: 01787 378084 Email: [email protected] Full Parish Council Minutes of Meeting Meeting called for 7:30pm, Thursday 2nd July 2020 Location Conducted by remote videoconferencing due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Councillors present I. Bartlett, M. Clayton, R. Delderfield, J. Ewbank, R. Kemp, L. Malvisi, C. Michette, R. Michette, J. Nunn (Chair), L. Tipper, D. Watts, J. Watts Councillors absent J. Lines Also attending D. Lovelock (Parish Clerk) The Chair opened the meeting at 7:33pm. The following Agenda items were addressed. 20/07-1 Apologies for Absence The Clerk advised that no apologies for absence had been received. 20/07-2 Declarations of Interest and Requests for Dispensation No declarations of interest were made by Councillors. The Clerk advised that no requests for dispensation had been received. 20/07-3 Confirmation of the Accuracy of Minutes Cllr. D. Watts noted that while the minutes were accurate, there had been a proposal at the 4th June meeting to consider a civic award during the current meeting but it was not on the Agenda. Cllr. Bartlett explained that it had subsequently been established that civic awards had to be dealt with under the Council's Civic Awards Policy. The Clerk confirmed this to be the case, and said that he would circulate a copy of the Policy and award nomination forms to Councillors within the next few days. Resolved – That the minutes for the Full Parish Council Meeting held on 4th June 2020 be accepted and signed by the Chair as providing an accurate record.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovered Appeal: Land Off Station Road, Long Melford, Suffolk (Ref: 3214377
    Our ref: APP/D3505/W/18/3214377 Stuart Carvel Your ref: n/a Gladman Developments Ltd Gladman House Alexandria Way Congleton Cheshire 1 April 2020 CW12 1LB Dear Sir, TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 – SECTION 78 APPEAL MADE BY GLADMAN DEVELOPMENTS LTD LAND OFF STATION ROAD, LONG MELFORD, SUFFOLK APPLICATION REF: DC/18/00606 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to say that consideration has been given to the report of Kenneth Stone BSc Hons DipTP MRTPI, who held a public inquiry between 25 June 2019 and 2 July 2019 into your appeal against the failure of Babergh District Council to determine your application for outline planning permission for the erection of up to 150 dwellings with public open space, landscaping and sustainable drainage system (SuDS), and vehicular access point from Station Road, with all matters reserved except means of access, in accordance with application ref: DC/18/00606, dated 8 February 2018. 2. On 25 June 2019, this appeal was recovered for the Secretary of State's determination, in pursuance of section 79 of, and paragraph 3 of Schedule 6 to, the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. Inspector’s recommendation and summary of the decision 3. The Inspector recommended that the appeal be allowed and planning permission granted, subject to conditions. 4. For the reasons given below, the Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector’s conclusions, except where stated, and agrees with his recommendation. He has decided to allow the appeal and grant planning permission. 5. A copy of the Inspector’s report (IR) is enclosed.
    [Show full text]
  • Dc/21/02319 Land to the East Of, Station Road, Long Melford, Suffolk
    Committee Report Item No: 6B Reference: DC/21/02319 Case Officer: Katherine Hale Ward: Long Melford Ward Member/s: Cllr John Nunn. Cllr Elisabeth Malvisi RECOMMENDATION – GRANT PLANNING PERMISSION WITH CONDITIONS Description of Development Submission of Details (Reserved Matters) and Discharge of Conditions 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, 16, 21, 22 and 24 under Outline Planning Permission DC/18/00606. Appearance, Landscaping, Layout and Scale for the erection of 150no dwellings and associated infrastructure. Members are advised that the conditions referred to relate to: Condition 5: Open Market Housing Mix Condition 7: Biodiversity Enhancement Strategy for Protected and Priority Species Condition 9: Construction Management Plan Condition 10: Construction Environmental Management Plan Condition 11: Construction Surface Water Management Plan Condition 13: Noise and Vibration Protection Scheme Condition 16: Surface Water Drainage Condition 21: Energy Assessment Condition 22: Archaeological WSI Condition 24: Scheme to Direct Existing High Voltage Overhead Lines NB – Whilst these conditions do overlap with the Reserved Matters, the discharge of conditions was delegated to Officers under Outline application DC/18/00606. Location Land To The East Of, Station Road, Long Melford, Suffolk CO10 9HP Expiry Date: 20/07/2021 Application Type: RES - Reserved Matters Development Type: Major Small Scale - Dwellings Applicant: Bloor Homes Agent: Mr James Bailey Parish: Long Melford Site Area: 8.23 hectares Density of Development: Gross Density (Total Site): 18.22
    [Show full text]
  • Route Options Consultations Appendices Part 2
    The result of this consultation will help decide whether or not this project continues. We want you to be able to make an informed response to this consultation. This booklet explains where the routes may be, where you can find more information, and how you can let us know what you think using our questionnaire. Why we are asking? We want to ask the local community what they think about the idea and understand how the routes may effect people. 3 The project is in the early stages and no final decisions have been made yet. Work would need to be done to decide on the right route, and get planning permission and funding before the route can be built. There will be another consultation with more information if the project progresses. The earliest a new road could be built would be 2027. The timeline on the next page shows the steps to construction. 4 Ipswich Northern Route timeline Options assessment We looked at the possible routes Consultation This is where we are now - asking the public what they think of the route options. Strategic Outline Business Case We will look at how the new Preferred route selected road can help us meet our business case The preferred route is chosen Outline Business Case We will put together our Consultation business case We will go back to people and ask them what they think Planning/Consents We will apply to get the approval to build the road Full Business Case We will present our business case to government and Construction council leaders The building of the new road will begin 5 We need to think carefully about what Suffolk needs to grow, and support the businesses and the people who already live and work here.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Appraisal
    Babergh District Council Local Development Framework Submission Core Strategy Sustainability Appraisal Appendices Part III September 2011 Babergh District Council Local Development Framework: Core Strategy Sustainability Appraisal Report Appendices Babergh District Council Local Development Framework Submission Core Strategy Sustainability Appraisal Report Appendices Part III September 2011 Notice This report was produced by Atkins and Babergh District Council for the specific purpose of the Submission Core Strategy Development Plan Document Sustainability Appraisal. This report may not be used by any person other than Babergh District Council without Babergh District Council's express permission. In any event, Atkins accepts no liability for any costs, liabilities or losses arising as a result of the use of or reliance upon the contents of this report by any person other than Babergh District Council. Document History JOB NUMBER: 5088144 DOCUMENT REF: Babergh Core Strategy SAR_V4.0 Appendices Part III.doc 4 Final OP OP CW CW 30.09.11 3 Draft for comment EB/OP OP CW CW 17.06.11 2 Final for consultation CS/OP/SM OP CW CW 31.05.10 1 Draft for Comment CS/OP/SM OP AG 12.04.10 Revision Purpose Description Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date 2 Babergh District Council Local Development Framework: Core Strategy Sustainability Appraisal Report Appendices Contents Appendix A – Broad Locations Assessment 4 A.1 Broad Locations Assessment Tables 5 Appendix B – Growth Scenarios Assessment Tables 62 Appendix C – Responses to Consultation on
    [Show full text]
  • 9 Groundwater Flooding
    ENVIRONMENTAL LTD PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT HOWLETTS OF LAVENHAM PREMISES SUDBURY ROAD LAVENHAM SUDBURY SUFFOLK Goldfinch Environmental Limited Proposed Residential Development, Howletts of Lavenham Premises, Sudbury Road, Lavenham, Sudbury, Suffolk. GeoEnvironmental Desk Study Report – Phase 1 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT HOWLETTS OF LAVENHAM PREMISES SUDBURY ROAD LAVENHAM SUDBURY SUFFOLK GEOENVIRONMENTAL DESK STUDY Report Ref.: 0750/1 Prepared by : D Sargeant D Sargeant BSc FGS Date: January 2021 Page 1 of 21 Environmental Limited Goldfinch 19 Palmer Street, Walsham Le Willows, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, IP31 3BZ Tel: 01359 258681 Goldfinch Environmental Limited Proposed Residential Development, Howletts of Lavenham Premises, Sudbury Road, Lavenham, Sudbury, Suffolk. GeoEnvironmental Desk Study Report – Phase 1 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 3 2. LIMITATIONS 4 3. LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY SETTING 5 4. SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION 6 5. SITE HISTORY 8 6. PRELIMINARY QUALITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT 16 7. RECOMMENDATIONS FOLLOWING PRELIMINARY RISK ASSESSMENT 19 8. CONCLUSIONS 20 FIGURES - Figure 1 Site Location Plan - Figure 2 Proposed Layout Plan APPENDICES - Appendix 1 ‘Groundsure’ Report Page 2 of 21 Environmental Limited Goldfinch 19 Palmer Street, Walsham Le Willows, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, IP31 3BZ Tel: 01359 258681 Goldfinch Environmental Limited Proposed Residential Development, Howletts of Lavenham Premises, Sudbury Road, Lavenham, Sudbury, Suffolk. GeoEnvironmental Desk Study Report – Phase 1 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT HOWLETTS OF LAVENHAM PREMISES SUDBURY ROAD, LAVENHAM SUDBURY SUFFOLK 1. INTRODUCTION. 1.1 General. This report describes the findings of a geoenvironmental desk study undertaken by Goldfinch Environmental Limited on the instruction of Mr S Howlett (the Client), via the offices of KLH Architects Ltd, at a site located off Melford Road, Sudbury, Suffolk.
    [Show full text]
  • Sudbury Relief Road: Strategic Outline Business Case
    REPORT NO 1.0 SUDBURY RELIEF ROAD: STRATEGIC OUTLINE BUSINESS CASE CONFIDENTIAL MARCH 2017 SUDBURY RELIEF ROAD: STRATEGIC OUTLINE BUSINESS CASE Suffolk County Council Final Confidential Project no: 70020874 Date: March 2017 – WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff 70 Chancery Lane London WC2A 1AF Phone: +44 020-7314-5000 Fax: +44 020-7314-5111 www.wsp-pb.com QUALITY MANAGEMENT ISSUE/REVISION FIRST ISSUE REVISION 1 REVISION 2 REVISION 3 Remarks First Draft Second Draft Final Final V2 Date 03/01/2017 03/01/2017 09/02/2017 15/03/2017 Prepared by Helen Scott Helen Scott Helen Scott Helen Scott Signature Checked by Jon Noble Jon Noble Jon Noble Jon Noble Signature Authorised by Jon Noble Jon Noble Jon Noble Jon Noble Signature Project number 70020874 70020874 70020874 70020874 Report number 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 ii PRODUCTION TEAM CLIENT Suffolk County Council Dave Watson WSP | PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF Associate Jon Noble Principal Krissel Alcaraz Engineer Helen Scott Sudbury Relief Road: Strategic Outline Business Case WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Suffolk County Council Project No 70020874 March 2017 Confidential iii 1 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................1 2 SETTING THE SCENE .................................................................2 3 STRATEGIC CASE ......................................................................7 3.1 BUSINESS STRATEGY .................................................................................. 7 3.2 STRATEGIC AIMS .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MSDC Development Control B Tabled Papers 05.08.2020 PDF 3 MB
    Public Document Pack DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE B DATE: WEDNESDAY, 5 AUGUST 2020 9.30 AM VENUE: VIRTUAL MEETING For consideration at the meeting on Wednesday, 5 AUGUST 2020, the following additional or updated papers that were unavailable when the Agenda was printed. TABLED PAPER S Page(s) 5 SA/19/25 CONFIRMATION OF THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING 3 - 8 HELD ON 8 JULY 2020 a DC/20/01677 LAND TO THE WEST OF THE FORMER BACON 9 - 132 FACTORY, ELMSWELL 1. Long Melford Appeal Decision recovered by the Secretary of State. In particular, attention is drawn to the planning balance and overall conclusions arrived at, in particular paragraphs 52 and 53 of the letter. This is considered useful given the similarities of the applications given they are both located outside of the established settlement boundary but adjacent to them and a five-year housing land supply can be demonstrated. It is worth noting the heavy material weight that both the Inspector and the Secretary of State gave towards the delivery of housing. 2. Copy of Suffolk County Council’s emerging five-year prioritised plan for cycling infrastructure particularly noting the inclusion of a route between Elmswell and Woolpit on page 92. Details of the emergent plan were put before Mid Suffolk District Council (23rd July 2020) who have determined to support the County Council’s cycling strategy. For more information about this meeting, including access arrangements and facilities for people with disabilities, please contact the Committee Officer, Committee Services on: 01449 724930 or Email:
    [Show full text]
  • Babergh District Council, Planning Policy Team, Corks Lane, Hadleigh, Ipswich, Suffolk, IP7 6SJ
    Appendix A Babergh Development Framework Draft Core Strategy - April 2010 (Preferred Options plus Issues & Options) Table of Contents Introduction 3 Spatial Portrait and Key Issues 9 Spatial Vision and Objectives 16 Spatial Strategy 19 Social and Physical InfrastructureSocial, Physical and Green 39 Infrastructure Planning for Mixed and Balanced Communities 44 Planning for a Sustainable Economy - employment, town centres and 54 tourism Sustainable Development – Planning for Climate Change 64 Built and Natural Environment 73 Monitoring and Implementation 76 Glossary 84 Appendix 1: Local Plan Policies to be Replaced by the Babergh Core 87 Strategy Appendix 2: Evidence Base 88 Appendix 3: Summary of the linkages between sustainable community 90 objectives and the Core Strategy objectives and policies Appendix 4: Housing Trajectory 96 Appendix 5: Summary of advantages and disadvantages of the broad 97 locations/directions of growth Appendix 6: Delivery of Infrastructure 111 Appendix 7: Monitoring framework for the Babergh Core Strategy 114 Appendix 8: Implementation framework for the Babergh Core Strategy 118 Table 1: Housing requirements to 2031 21 Table 2: Geographical distribution of Key Service Centres and Other 23 Villages across the district Table 3: Distribution of housing across the district to 2031 30 2 1. Introduction The Local Development Framework 1.1 In September 2004 the government introduced a new planning system to manage spatial planning in England. The new planning system is aimed at place shaping and bringing together policies for development and use of land and is no longer just focussed on land use planning. It requires Local Authorities to prepare Local Development Frameworks (LDF). The LDF consists of a number of planning documents containing the local authority’s planning policies and proposals that together with the Regional Spatial Strategy forms the spatial plan for the district.
    [Show full text]