DOCSLIB.ORG

Animals, Identity and Cosmology: Mortuary Practice in Early Medieval Eastern England Clare Eleanor RAINSFORD Submitted for the D

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Animals, Identity and Cosmology: Mortuary Practice in Early Medieval Eastern England Clare Eleanor RAINSFORD Submitted for the D Animals, Identity and Cosmology: Mortuary Practice in Early Medieval Eastern England Item Type Thesis Authors Rainsford, Clare E. Rights <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/3.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by- nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />The University of Bradford theses are licenced under a <a rel="license" href="http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Licence</a>. Download date 26/09/2021 13:22:38 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10454/17224 Animals, Identity and Cosmology: Mortuary Practice in Early Medieval Eastern England Clare Eleanor RAINSFORD Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Archaeological and Forensic Sciences Faculty of Life Sciences University of Bradford 2017 Abstract Clare Eleanor Rainsford Animals, Identity & Cosmology: Mortuary Practice in Early Medieval Eastern England Keywords: zooarchaeology, animals, burial, ritual, cemetery, Anglo-Saxon, cremation, inhumation, Norfolk. The inclusion of animal remains in funerary contexts was a routine feature of Anglo-Saxon cremation ritual, and less frequently of inhumations, until the introduction of Christianity during the 7th century. Most interpretation has focused either on the animal as symbolic of identity or as an indication of pagan belief, with little consideration given to the interaction between these two aspects. Animals were a fundamental and ubiquitous part of early medieval society, and their contribution to mortuary practices is considered to be multifaceted, reflecting their multiple roles in everyday life. This project considers the roles of animals in mortuary practice between the 5th-7th centuries across five counties in eastern England – Norfolk, Suffolk, Lincolnshire, Cambridgeshire and Essex – in both cremation and inhumation rites. Animal remains have been recognised in 5th to 7th century burials in eastern England from an early date, and the quality of the existing archives (both material and written) is investigated and discussed as an integral part of designing a methodology to effectively summarise data across a wide area. From the eastern England dataset, four aspects of identity in mortuary practice are considered in terms of their influence on the role of animals: choice of rite (cremation/inhumation); human biological identity (age & gender); regionality; and changing expressions of belief and status in the 7th century. The funerary role of animals is argued to be based around broadly consistent cosmologies which are locally contingent in their expression and practice. i Acknowledgements “You must depend upon affection, reading, knowledge, skill – more of each than you have…” Wendell Berry (2013: 354) This research was funded by an Arts & Humanities Research Council Studentship under the Collaborative Doctoral Award scheme, with Norwich Castle Museum as the partner organisation. Within this project, I have benefited from the support of my three supervisors – Dr Julie Bond and Dr Jo Buckberry from the University of Bradford, and Dr Tim Pestell from Norwich Castle Museum. The comments and support received have helped make this thesis what it is. Thanks also to my co- student, Michelle Williams-Ward, who shared the data collection and the data from Illington and Markshall. The following people provided access to unpublished data, reports, articles or theses, without which this research would be much the poorer: Jo Caruth (Lakenheath); Kenneth Penn (Field Dalling); Kris Poole (PhD thesis; Sedgeford); James Nottingham (MSc thesis on Oakington); Katie McCullough-French (PhD thesis on Midlands cremations); Lucy Sladen (MA thesis on Kent inhumation burials). Thanks to Karen Weston for creating the maps used in this thesis with her GIS wizardry. David Orton kindly provided access to University of York lab space and reference collections; and Eva Fairnell showed me how to use MS Word properly. For conversations which helped knock my thinking into shape, I am indebted to the research community at the University of Bradford. Most particularly, I am also indebted to Terry O’Connor and David Roberts, for being the best kind of friends, colleagues and readers. The process of research involved a lot of largely unfunded travelling, mostly between Yorkshire and East Anglia. A number of people made this possible for me, whether by having me to stay when I was working and grumpy, or looking after house, home and the succession of hamsters over the many times I was away: namely, Sarah Shailes, Carol Backhouse, Karen Weston, Valerie Clay, Sian Eastwood, Jo Nic, Lucy Pell-Walpole, Terry & Sonia O’Connor, and particularly my parents, without whose support this wouldn’t have happened. ii This thesis was fuelled by the music of Show of Hands and Public Service Broadcasting, and approximately 2,920 cups of Yorkshire Tea. iii List of Contents Abstract………………………………………………………………………………i Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………...ii List of Contents…………………………………………………………………….iv List of Figures...…………………………………………………………………….x List of Tables….…………………………………………………………………...xv 470AD……………………………………………………………………………..xvii Chapter 1: Introduction 1.1 Introduction .............................................................................................. 1 1.1.1 Research Aims & Direction ................................................................... 3 1.1.2 Objectives ............................................................................................. 4 1.2 Locating the Project ................................................................................. 6 1.2.1 Defining Animal Remains ...................................................................... 6 1.2.2 Temporal and Spatial Boundaries ......................................................... 8 1.2.3 Role of the Norfolk CDA ...................................................................... 10 1.3 Early Anglo-Saxon England: Society, Burial and Belief ......................... 12 1.3.1 Society ................................................................................................ 12 1.3.2 Burial ................................................................................................... 14 1.3.3 Belief ................................................................................................... 17 1.3.4 Conclusions ........................................................................................ 19 Chapter 2: The Nature of Belief 2.1 Animal Remains in Anglo-Saxon Mortuary Context: A Short Historiography .............................................................................................. 21 2.1.1 Origins................................................................................................. 21 2.1.2 Cremations and Inhumations: Bodies of Evidence .............................. 23 2.1.2.1 Cremation .................................................................................. 24 2.1.2.2 Inhumation ................................................................................. 27 2.1.3 Flogging a Dead Horse? Anglo-Saxon Horse Burials and Mortuary Ritual ............................................................................................................ 30 2.1.4 Conclusions ........................................................................................ 33 2.2 ReTheorising Animal Inclusions: From Eschatology to Cosmology ....... 34 2.2.1 Animal Transformations & Shamanism ............................................... 34 2.2.2 The Anglo-Saxon Funeral as Remembrance ...................................... 37 iv 2.2.3 What did this Sheep Mean To You? Animals, Identity and Cosmology ..................................................................................................................... 39 2.3 Animals and Belief Beyond The Grave .................................................. 41 2.3.1 Anglo-Saxon Animals – An Exercise In Source Pluralism ................... 42 2.3.2 Animals in Anglo-Saxon England: Non-mortuary Contexts ................. 45 2.3.2.1 Early Anglo-Saxon Animals: The Settlement Evidence ............. 45 2.3.2.2 The Later Anglo-Saxon Period and the Christianisation of the Animalscape .......................................................................................... 48 2.3.3 An Anglo-Saxon Cosmology? ............................................................. 52 2.4 Summary................................................................................................ 55 Chapter 3: Data Quality and Validity 3.1 Constructing a Dataset .......................................................................... 57 3.2 Data Quality: A Norfolk Case Study ....................................................... 58 3.2.1 Cremation ........................................................................................... 60 3.2.2 Inhumation .......................................................................................... 63 3.2.3 Summary ............................................................................................. 66 3.3 Inhumation Cemeteries .......................................................................... 68 3.3.1 On Determining Intentionality of Deposits ........................................... 68 3.3.2 Mortuary Feasting and Disarticulated Bone ........................................ 73 3.3.2.1 Methods ..................................................................................... 74 3.3.2.2 Caister-by-Yarmouth
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dynamics of Religious Ritual: Migration and Adaptation in Early Medieval Britain
    Dynamics of Religious Ritual: Migration and Adaptation in Early Medieval Britain A Dissertation SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Brooke Elizabeth Creager IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Peter S. Wells August 2019 Brooke Elizabeth Creager 2019 © For my Mom, I could never have done this without you. And for my Grandfather, thank you for showing me the world and never letting me doubt I can do anything. Thank you. i Abstract: How do migrations impact religious practice? In early Anglo-Saxon England, the practice of post-Roman Christianity adapted after the Anglo-Saxon migration. The contemporary texts all agree that Christianity continued to be practiced into the fifth and sixth centuries but the archaeological record reflects a predominantly Anglo-Saxon culture. My research compiles the evidence for post-Roman Christian practice on the east coast of England from cemeteries and Roman churches to determine the extent of religious change after the migration. Using the case study of post-Roman religion, the themes religion, migration, and the role of the individual are used to determine how a minority religion is practiced during periods of change within a new culturally dominant society. ii Table of Contents Abstract …………………………………………………………………………………...ii List of Figures ……………………………………………………………………………iv Preface …………………………………………………………………………………….1 I. Religion 1. Archaeological Theory of Religion ...………………………………………………...3 II. Migration 2. Migration Theory and the Anglo-Saxon Migration ...……………………………….42 3. Continental Ritual Practice before the Migration, 100 BC – AD 400 ………………91 III. Southeastern England, before, during and after the Migration 4. Contemporary Accounts of Religion in the Fifth and Sixth Centuries……………..116 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Author's Accepted Manuscript AQY-RE-18-124 Accepted 6/12/18
    Author’s Accepted Manuscript AQY-RE-18-124 Accepted 6/12/18 to appear in Antiquity and subject to further type/proofing edits. Please cite final version. This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution, re-sale or use in derivative works. © Cambridge University Press Memories of Migration? So-called “Anglo-Saxon” Burial Costume of the Fifth Century AD James M. Harland. DFG-Kolleg-Forschergruppe, “Migration and Mobility in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages,” Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Keplerstraße 2, 72074 Tübingen, Germany. [email protected]. Abstract It is often alleged that wearers of the burial kit which began to appear in lowland Britain in the fifth century AD began to construct new forms of ethnic community by doing so. This article considers the empirical basis for this assertion, and assesses it in light of approaches to ethnic constructivism proposed by Rogers Brubaker (2004) and Andreas Wimmer (2013). The article finds the basis for such assertions lacking, and appeals for the development of new interpretative approaches to the study of early medieval mortuary archaeology in Britain. Introduction Ethnic identity is a situational construct which fashions communities through real and fictive stories and memories. Studies of early Anglo-Saxon burial archaeology have long recognized this, and scepticism of the putatively “Germanic” culture of graves in England can be found as early as Hills (1979). Early doubts, however, largely depended upon the absence of empirical evidence rather than querying of the categories proposed, and most works pre-2000 simply took a constructivist approach to culture historical interpretation (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Sighted Surfaces Ocular Agency in Early Anglo-Saxon Cremation Burials
    Sighted Surfaces Ocular Agency in Early Anglo-Saxon Cremation Burials Ruth Nugent & Howard Williams Abstract The art of early Anglo-Saxon cremation urns is rich, diverse and rarely explored beyond its presumed status as reflecting the earliest Germanic settlers in fifth-century eastern and southern England (Williams 2005a). We consider why and how decorated cinerary urns operated in funerals through their haptic and visual qualities. In particular, recurring overt and abstract depictions of eyes, as well as apertures in the urn body, suggest the cremated dead were perceived as being inherently sensing and ‘sighted’ even after their fiery transformation. Introduction Alluding in no small measure to Julian D. Richards’ (1987; 1992) ground-breaking investigation of the mortuary symbolism of early Anglo-Saxon urn form and decora- tion, Neil Price has recently noted what an ‘… extraordinary resource [Anglo-Saxon funerary urns] represent for the symbolic repertoire of early English mortuary behaviour’ (Price 2010a:xvi). This paper aims to build on this statement. Rather than seeking to decode urn decoration in the manner suggested by Richards, we explore the sensory agency of the art on cinerary urns in early Anglo-Saxon England. In doing so, the study draws upon recent debates that have foregrounded the active roles of imagery in constituting links with the supernatural and shared senses of past and present in Migration Period Europe (e.g. Behr 2010) and wider discussions of the material agency of art (Gell 1992; 1998). While this discussion has, to date, largely focused on metalwork, we argue that the decoration of cinerary urns held a commemorative significance in the mortuary arena by emphasising the pot as containing, protecting, storing and perhaps also ‘reanimating’ the dead.
    [Show full text]
  • Parish Registers and Transcripts in the Norfolk Record Office
    Parish Registers and Transcripts in the Norfolk Record Office This list summarises the Norfolk Record Office’s (NRO’s) holdings of parish (Church of England) registers and of transcripts and other copies of them. Parish Registers The NRO holds registers of baptisms, marriages, burials and banns of marriage for most parishes in the Diocese of Norwich (including Suffolk parishes in and near Lowestoft in the deanery of Lothingland) and part of the Diocese of Ely in south-west Norfolk (parishes in the deanery of Fincham and Feltwell). Some Norfolk parish records remain in the churches, especially more recent registers, which may be still in use. In the extreme west of the county, records for parishes in the deanery of Wisbech Lynn Marshland are deposited in the Wisbech and Fenland Museum, whilst Welney parish records are at the Cambridgeshire Record Office. The covering dates of registers in the following list do not conceal any gaps of more than ten years; for the populous urban parishes (such as Great Yarmouth) smaller gaps are indicated. Whenever microfiche or microfilm copies are available they must be used in place of the original registers, some of which are unfit for production. A few parish registers have been digitally photographed and the images are available on computers in the NRO's searchroom. The digital images were produced as a result of partnership projects with other groups and organizations, so we are not able to supply copies of whole registers (either as hard copies or on CD or in any other digital format), although in most cases we have permission to provide printout copies of individual entries.
    [Show full text]
  • Purpose, Wells Should Have Been Able to Abandon the Descriptive Level Of
    110 111 purpose, Wells should have been I,15) . Although we can tentatively Merovingian period metalwork from Roman to Medieval times . able to abandon the descriptive identify 'Angles' and 'Saxons' in Lower Saxony. level of his analysis and expand the material from archaeological The six English papers tackle A useful feature of this fest­ the general model through its ap­ excavations, 'Jutes' have always a wide range of subjects on settle­ schrift must be the comprehensive plication to the specific situa­ proved difficult to locate with ments, artefacts and cemeteries. bibliography of Myres' published tion, and such work has been done certainty. These eternal problems , Catherine Hills discusses the works . However, the book has a few with far greater expertise and suc­ then, could be seen as inspira­ origin and dating of barred zoo­ shortcomings. There is no index and cess by Frankenstein and Rowlands. tional for the papers in this book. morphic bone combs, many of which some of the Continental papers hav~ It is therefore difficult to see All the contributors refer, in some have been found in her excavation been translated into English and that Wells' book makes any original way, to one of these three peoples, at Spong Hill. Vera Evison presents seem to have lost their original contribution to, or expands on, whether on the Continent or in distribution maps of certain early crispness in the process . The these earlier studies of essential­ England, The title of this fest­ artefact types and aims to demon­ figures and maps and bibliographies ly the same problem. schrift could be called an all­ strate parallels between some for each paper come after the embracing one; it signifies not English grave groups and 4th/5th paper's text but the plates are * * * only the peoples on whose material century 'Germanic' burials on the grouped together at the back of the culture Myres based most of his Continent.
    [Show full text]
  • Regalia and Weaponry in Early Anglo-Saxon Royal Graves Archaeologia John Hines
    V. THE ROLE OF WEAPONS AND WEAPONRY IN POLITICAL AND MILITARY LEADERSHIP BALTICA 8 BALTICA FIT FOR A KING? REGALIA AND WEAPONRY IN EARLY ANGLO-SAXON ROYAL GRAVES ARCHAEOLOGIA JOHN HINES Abstract The excavation of a princely grave of the early seventh century at Prittlewell, Essex, in 2003, is the starting point for a review of the development of kingship in early Anglo-Saxon England. Emphasis is placed upon the equally important contributions of history and archaeology. It is also argued that it is essential to balance the attention given to the immediate contexts in England with the long-term development of kingship amongst the Germanic peoples. Valuable supplementary evidence is found in the terminology of kingship and lordship in Germanic philology, as well as the comparative study of Continental Fürstengräber of the Roman Iron Age. Key words: Anglo-Saxon, archaeology, burial, kingship, Prittlewell, Sutton Hoo. Early-medieval kingship 1938; Genrich 1954; Wegewitz 1977). It has proved rather easy to lose sight of that situation when German- In our many efforts to understand how the organization ic kingship in the middle of the first millennium AD V of society developed amongst the Germanic-speaking is considered principally in the light of the different THE ROLE peoples over the two thousand years from the Iron Age, scope for political leadership in the context of the great OF WEAPONS before the birth of Christ, to the High Middle Ages, the war-bands, such as those of the Goths, which invaded AND WEAPONRY history of kingship remains one of the most fundamen- and conquered the more southerly parts of the Roman IN POLITICAL tal challenges for archaeological and historical scholar- Empire in Europe, and are therefore better illuminated AND MILITARY ship.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ROMAN and ANGLO-SAXON CEMETERY at GREAT CASTERTON: the 1966 EXCAVATION Peter Liddle
    THE ROMAN AND ANGLO-SAXON CEMETERY AT GREAT CASTERTON: THE 1966 EXCAVATION Peter Liddle Based on a report by Guy Grainger and Christine Mahany, with contributions from Bernard Denston, Helena Hamerow and John Shepherd This paper, which is based on a completed monograph written by Guy Grainger from notes and records by Christine Mahany, presents the results of an excavation in 1966 of Roman and Anglo-Saxon burials on the north side of the Roman defences of Great Casterton. The main conclusion is that Roman burials, in all probability, continue into the fifth century in an extensive area north of the walled town. At some stage in the later fifth century, Anglo-Saxon cremation burials were buried to the east, while somewhat later (where there is a relationship), Anglo-Saxon inhumation burials are also present. INTRODUCTION Circumstances of the excavation During the course of road-widening operations in Ryhall Road by Rutland County Council in September 1966, F. Rotherham, the foreman in charge of the work, noticed that human bones and Saxon pottery were being disturbed by the mechanical excavator. He immediately informed Nottingham University, and Stamford and Oakham Museums. An emergency excavation was accordingly undertaken, firstly by J. L. Barber of Oakham School Museum and the late Malcolm Dean, and subsequently by Christine Mahany for the Stamford Archaeological Research Committee on behalf of the Ministry of Public Building and Works. The excavation continued for six weeks. The Assistant Supervisor was C. S. B. Young, but otherwise the labour was provided entirely by volunteers. In view of the nature of the emergency it was decided to concentrate the available resources on recovering as much as possible of the plan of the cemetery, and not to attempt to excavate underlying features.
    [Show full text]
  • Breckland Definitive Statement of Public Rights Of
    Norfolk County Council Definitive Statement of Public Rights of Way District of Breckland Contains public sector information c Norfolk County Council; Available for re-use under the Open Government Licence v3: http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/ Statement downloaded 16th January 2021; latest version available online at: https://www.norfolk.gov.uk/out-and-about-in-norfolk/public-rights-of-way/ map-and-statement-of-public-rights-of-way-in-norfolk/definitive-statements Document compiled by Robert Whittaker; http://robert.mathmos.net/ PARISH OF ASHILL Footpath No. 1 (South Pickenham/Watton Road to Houghton Common Road). Starts from fieldgate on South Pickenham/Watton Road and runs eastwards to enter Houghton Common Road opposite western end of Footpath No. 5. Bridleway No. 2 (South Pickenham/Watton Road to Peddars Way). Starts from South Pickenham/Watton Road and runs south westwards and enters Peddars Way by Caudle Hill. Footpath No 5 (Houghton Common to Church Farm) Starts from Houghton Common Road opposite the eastern end of Footpath No. 1 and runs eastwards to TF 880046. From this point onwards the width of the path is 1.5 metres and runs north along the eastern side of a drainage ditch for approximately 94 metres to TF 879047 where it turns to run in an easterly direction along the southern side of a drainage ditch for approximately 275 metres to TF 882048. The path then turns south running on the western side of a drainage ditch for approximately 116 metres to TF 882046, then turns eastwards to the south of a drainage ditch for approximately 50 metres to TF 883047 where it turns to run southwards on the western side of a drainage ditch for approximately 215 metres to TF 883044 thereafter turning west along the northern side of a drainage ditch and hedge for approximately 120 metres to TF 882044.
    [Show full text]
  • BRECKLAND MANOR £850,000 Correct File and Location
    The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. BRECKLAND MANORBRECKLAND £850,000 IP24 1RW NORFOLK, WRETHAM, FREEHOLD ILLINGTON ROAD WRETHAM, NORFOLK, IP24 1RW A charming country residence set in a rural location on the edge of the village of Wretham. At the end of a long private driveway, you discover Breckland Manor. This delightful property appointed over three levels with three reception rooms & cellar. Cloakroom, Kitchen/breakfast room with Aga, walk in pantry & utility room. Two large Art Deco, original bathrooms, six large bedrooms with amazing views of the countryside, an attic bedroom and double garage. Grounds extend to approximately three acres. There are field shelters with post and rail fencing to the well-drained paddocks. Excellent train links from Thetford on main line to Cambridge & Norwich. One change for access to London. Quick access to the A11. Breckland Manor is located in a beautiful, rural setting, amongst open farmland. There is evidence of the original building dating back to the 1700’s. The current house was built in the early 20th Century during the Arts and Crafts movement and later extended in the 1960’s with the addition of the garage and bedrooms above. The neighbouring property, Breckland Cottage, has right of way over the Manor’s private drive. The annex to Breckland Manor is a single story, one bedroom, bathroom and kitchen/lounge and was occupied by the present owner’s father.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal and Human Depictions on Artefacts from Early Anglo-Saxon Graves in the Light of Theories of Material Culture
    Animal and human depictions on artefacts from early Anglo-Saxon graves in the light of theories of material culture Submitted by Leah Moradi to the University of Exeter as a dissertation for the degree of Master of Arts by Research in Archaeology in January 2019 This thesis is made available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this dissertation which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. Signature: …………………………………………………………. Abstract This dissertation explores the relationship between animal and human motifs on early Anglo-Saxon (AD 450–650) artefacts and the individuals with whom the objects are buried, as well as the wider communities to which they belong. A sample of sites was taken from the two historical regions of East Anglia and Wessex, compiling data such as object type and material, sex and age of individuals, and the human and animal motifs depicted. From a total of 32 sites, 5560 graves were analyzed; of these, 198 graves from 28 sites contained artefacts with anthropomorphic and/or zoomorphic decoration. Anthropological and material culture theories of totemism, shamanism, animism, and object agency were employed in the interpretation of results to consider the symbolic meaning of anthropomorphically- and zoomorphically-decorated objects, and how they may have reflected the social organization and ideologies of communities in early Anglo-Saxon England.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Anglo-Saxon' Burial Costume of the Fifth Century AD
    Memories of migration? The ‘Anglo-Saxon’ burial costume of the fifth century AD James M. Harland* It is often claimed that the mortuary traditions that appeared in lowland Britain in the fifth century AD are an expression of new forms of ethnic identity, based on the putative mem- orialisation of a ‘Germanic’ heritage. This article considers the empirical basis for this assertion and evaluates it in the light of previously proposed ethnic constructivist approaches. No sound basis for such claims is identified, and the article calls for the develop- ment of new interpretative approaches for the study of early medieval mortuary archaeology in Britain. Keywords: Britain, Anglo-Saxon, ethnicity, migration, mortuary archaeology Introduction Ethnic identity is a situational construct that fashions communities through real and fictive stories and memories. Studies of early Anglo-Saxon burial archaeology have long recognised this, and scepticism regarding the putatively ‘Germanic’ culture of some graves in England can be found as early as Hills (1979). Such early doubts, however, depended largely upon the absence of evidence for ‘Germanic’ material culture, rather than a questioning of the eth- nic categories proposed. The arguments for the interpretation of this material culture derive largely from studies of ‘Germanic’ material on the European continent—to which British scholarship sometimes makes unquestioning reference, and most works published before 2000 simply adopted a constructivist approach to culture-historical interpretation. These works introduced the notion that ethnic identity is a situational construct, rather than a static * Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, DFG Center for Advanced Studies 2496 ‘Migration and Mobility in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages’, Keplerstraße 2, Tübingen 72074, Germany (Email: james.harland@philo- sophie.uni-tuebingen.de) © Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Old English Ecologies: Environmental Readings of Anglo-Saxon Texts and Culture
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Dissertations Graduate College 12-2013 Old English Ecologies: Environmental Readings of Anglo-Saxon Texts and Culture Ilse Schweitzer VanDonkelaar Western Michigan University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations Part of the Literature in English, British Isles Commons, and the Medieval Studies Commons Recommended Citation VanDonkelaar, Ilse Schweitzer, "Old English Ecologies: Environmental Readings of Anglo-Saxon Texts and Culture" (2013). Dissertations. 216. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations/216 This Dissertation-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. OLD ENGLISH ECOLOGIES: ENVIRONMENTAL READINGS OF ANGLO-SAXON TEXTS AND CULTURE by Ilse Schweitzer VanDonkelaar A dissertation submitted to the Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of English Western Michigan University December 2013 Doctoral Committee: Jana K. Schulman, Ph.D., Chair Eve Salisbury, Ph.D. Richard Utz, Ph.D. Sarah Hill, Ph.D. OLD ENGLISH ECOLOGIES: ENVIRONMENTAL READINGS OF ANGLO-SAXON TEXTS AND CULTURE Ilse Schweitzer VanDonkelaar, Ph.D. Western Michigan University, 2013 Conventionally, scholars have viewed representations of the natural world in Anglo-Saxon (Old English) literature as peripheral, static, or largely symbolic: a “backdrop” before which the events of human and divine history unfold. In “Old English Ecologies,” I apply the relatively new critical perspectives of ecocriticism and place- based study to the Anglo-Saxon canon to reveal the depth and changeability in these literary landscapes.
    [Show full text]