A Time of Crises Consumer Co-Operatives and Their Problems Around 1990

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Time of Crises Consumer Co-Operatives and Their Problems Around 1990 A TIME OF CRISES CONSUMER CO-OPERATIVES AND THEIR PROBLEMS AROUND 1990 Edited by JOHANN BRAZDA and ROBERT SCHEDIWY 4 5 CONTENTS Volumne 1 Page Editors’ Notes 11 Introduction 13 Johann Brazda and Robert Schediwy Great Britain 45 Franz Müller Germany 139 Johann Brazda Sweden 229 Robert Schediwy Netherlands 341 Johannes Reintjes Switzerland 375 Johanna Setzer Volumne 2 Finland 573 Robert Schediwy France 671 Robert Schediwy Italy 817 Johanna Setzer Austria 900 Robert Blaich Japan 1023 Günter Vacek VOLUMNE 1 8 9 EDITORS’ NOTE: Approximately 25 years ago the editors applied in the year 1985 for a grant by the Anniversary Fund of the Austrian Na- tional Bank in order to finance a research project: “Structural changes in Consumer Co-operatives – An International Compari- son”. Based on comparative studies of selected industrial countries with a strong cooperative tradition, the research project should analyse changes in the political, social and economic frame condi- tions of consumer cooperatives. The reason and background to this endeavour were the visible problems of Austria’s “Konsum Österreich”. These problems were similar to the ones that had hit the consumer co-operative move- ments of the Netherlands and of Belgium some years before, and in France even more dramatic events had hit the sector. In Scan- dinavia, too, the 1970s and 1980s had been unkind to the respec- tive co-operative movements. We wanted to look at the structural similarities and the underlying reasons of these crises in order to develop possible strategies for survival and renewed success. Our proposal found the approval of the bank’s scientific com- mittee, and our research team set out to work with enthusiasm even though the amount of money apportioned to us was rather moderate – less than 30,000 Euros in today’s Euro currency, in total. Our japanologist e.g. would have been able to pay himself just one flight to Tokyo and back to Vienna for his share of the money – thank God he had to fly there anyway. Our comparative study, published by an open-minded Interna- tional Co-operative Alliance in 1989 has – unfortunately – be- come something of a legend. We would have preferred a different outcome. Indeed our main (non-scientific) intent behind the study was to awaken the mem- bers and the management of “Konsum Österreich” to the danger their organisation was in. We wanted to blow the whistle of alarm – in vain. 10 11 Introduction The German version of our ten country study met with almost CONSUMER CO–OPERATIVES ON THE complete silence – and the part about Austria was actually DEFENSIVE bought up by the management of “Konsum Austria” in 1988. A SHORT OVERVIEW They thought our cry of alarm was simply “bad publicity”. Seven years later “Konsum Österreich” had to declare insol- vency, and our respective country study (authored by Robert Consumer co-operatives can be regarded as a strategy for disfa- Blaich: “Der rote Riese wankt”, Vienna 1995) was published as a voured members of society - occasionally encouraged by private or negative prophecy come true. institutional benefactors - to pool their strength in order to liberate themselves from material, social and political dependence by collec- A quarter of a century has passed since we have started our tive action.(1) The integrative power of this strategy is evident by the study. We have decided that the (few) scholars still interested in fact that it was able to bring together members of different social the subject should have electronic access to its content. classes as well as of different creeds - as the working together of the It may be outdated but, alas, not all of its messages are obso- christian and atheist founders of the Rochdale pioneers bears lete. So we spoke the first time about a life cycle concept for the witness of. Together with the impulse of resistance to the pauperi- Federative Systems of Cooperatives. sation of the working class in the industrial revolution a structure was created that became extremely important for today’s co-opera- tive movement all over the world. Johann Brazda and Robert Schediwy In this context our study was to look at the processes of consumer Vienna, in September, 2011 co-operative development on various levels:(2) a) The mechanisms whereby certain economic dependencies were overcome were to be analyzed as well as the new dependencies that became part of co-operative success itself. b) The role of the initial enthusiasm of the co-operative members for the task of building co–operatives was to be taken account of as well as the loss in dynamism, the hierarchisation and organiza- tional sclerosis, that often became part of co–operative develop- ment in more recent years. c) The role of member participation was to be looked at in all its positive and also some of its less positive aspects. 1.1. FROM BENEVOLENCE TO INSTITUTIONS OF THE WORKING CLASS On the European continent most consumer co-operatives before 1885 were founded “from above” i.e. under the patronage of persons 12 13 Johann Brazda/Robert Schediwy Introduction coming from the existing social elite (big landowners, factory The ideology of consumer co-operatives spread in Europe by the owners etc.). According to the dogma of laissez-faire liberalism enormously influential book by Holyoake (5) on the Rochdale pio- (whose deficiencies were clear to the more farsighted members of neers in the 1860‘s was one mostly taken up by lower middle classes this elite) co–operatives were meant to mitigate the problems of the and an economic elite of industrial workers and favoured by enligh- industrial revolution and to act as a kind of mild “countervailing tened benefactors. According to G. Mazzini e.g. there was no power” - thereby stabilizing the system as a whole. Consumer co– antagonism between labour and capital and between the social operatives were regarded as a means to reduce the cost of living for classes. He saw the cooperatives as an instrument to change society workers, small businessmen or state officials. This was an idea that in a non revolutionary manner. They were to be a motor of Italian their employers as well were able to favour in a view of enlightened national unification in a spirit of cooperation. self-interest, since it would tend to reduce the upward pressure on The radical wing of the workers’ movements then in their forma- wages if the wage-earners were able to buy more goods for the same tive years at first opposed these concepts strictly. Especially the amount of money. A favourable factor in this context was the relative marxists showed great distrust with regard to consumer co-operati- backwardness of a distribution system characterized by a multitude ves.(6) The Italian socialist leader F. Turati wrote in 1896 that of small outlets, enormous markups and strong indebtedness on the consumer cooperatives would become part of the existing order of consumer as well as on the small shopowner level. This created a society without solving any problem or liberating anybody. Coopera- certain economic pressure to make commerce more efficient as had tives would be reduced to an instrument of propaganda.(7) happened to production by the advent of machinery and the dra- matic fall in costs accompanying it. The big founding-wave of consumer co-operatives on the Euro- pean continent, however, was already closely tied up with the Among the leading “benefactors” propagating co-operatives on organized workers’ movement. During the last decade of the 19th the European continent we can name de Boyve and Auguste Fabre in century and the first decade of the present century every major France as well as Eduard Pfeiffer and Hermann Schulze-Delitzsch in country of Europe witnessed the birth of thousands of new consumer Germany, the leading Swedish cooperators von Kraemer and von co-operatives. Partially it was a true grass-roots movement, which Koch, tax collector Kupper in Holland, Guiseppe Mazzini in Italy, the practically forced the political leaders of the working class to accept philanthropist Heinrich Zschokke in Switzerland.(3) In Great Brit- the idea of consumer co-operation as part of the workers’ movement. ain Robert Owen played a similar role some generations before, even Partially the example of the heavily politicized Belgian co-opera- though his ideas and practical attempts were more far-reaching tives, above all the “Vooruit” (“Forward”) of Gent convinced the than those of other co-operative pioneers. In Japan the social political strategists that co-operatives could have organizational as reformer Kagawa Toyohiko played a similar but even more success- well as financial advantages for the party and the unions too. A co- ful role around the middle of this century. operative building could house other institutions of the labour From the commentary to Austria’s law on co–operatives dating movement as well, blacklisted unionists could find employment in from 1873 - the heyday of Austria’s short-lived liberalism - we can the co-operative sector and co-operatives could help the families of judge how even a parliament elected by less than 5 per cent of a members on strike ...(8) The Italian socialist C. Trevos saw coopera- population and consisting mainly of representatives of the weal- tives actually as an instrument to finance the party and as valuable thiest classes could see co-operatives with a favourable eye: This law tools in cases of long and difficult union battles.(9) was meant to “mitigate the social question” (i.e. the mass poverty These concepts, however, were not necessarily apt to increase the brought about by the industrial revolution) “without questioning the economic stability of newly-founded co-operatives, usually hampe- property of the possessing classes” at the same time “extracting the red by a lack of capital, lack of expertise in management and poorer classes from the erroneous teachings of communism”.(4) 14 15 Johann Brazda/Robert Schediwy Introduction accounting as well as by the immediate desire of the members to earn 1.2.
Recommended publications
  • Mapping: Key Figures National Report: United Kingdom Ica-Eu Partnership
    MAPPING: KEY FIGURES NATIONAL REPORT: UNITED KINGDOM ICA-EU PARTNERSHIP TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND CONTEXT ........................................................................... 2 i. Historical background ........................................................................................... 2 ii. Public national statistics ....................................................................................... 4 iii. Research methodology......................................................................................... 5 II. KEY FIGURES ......................................................................................................... 6 iv. ICA member data ................................................................................................. 7 v. General overview .................................................................................................. 7 vi. Sector overview .................................................................................................... 8 III. GRAPHS................................................................................................................. 11 vii. Number of cooperatives by type of cooperative: ............................................... 11 viii. Number of memberships by type of cooperative: .............................................. 12 ix. Number of employees by type of cooperative: .................................................. 13 x. Turnover by type of cooperative in EUR: ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Teaching Resource Pack About the Rochdale Pioneers and the Origins of the Modern Co-Operative Movement
    Pioneers magical mystery game rules printing guide A teaching resource pack about the Rochdale Pioneers and the origins of the modern co-operative movement. © The Co-operative College 2012 Printing Guide Facilitator guide Answer sheet Player sheet Posters Ideally to be printed in A2 Square boards Print in A3, cut and laminate Counters A4, 2 for page. Cut out and build A teaching resource pack about the Rochdale Pioneers and the origins of the modern co-operative movement. © The Co-operative College 2012 rules 1. Choose a partner and pick a counter (there are 12 different counters) to form a team. 2. Each team will take turns to throw the dice and move the number of places shown on the dice up the board. If you reach the end then you turn around and work your way back down again. 3. When you land on a number you should go and find the poster with the same number. This will be somewhere around the room. 4. Read the information on the poster and look out for any: NAMES, PLACES, NUMBERS, FOOD or DATES. 5. Write these in the spaces on your clue sheet. 6. Tick off the number of the poster below so that you know which you have visited. 7. Now return to the board, throw the dice again, and move to another number and visit that poster. 8. Keep going until you have been to all the posters. 9. Now return to the start and collect your Story Sheet. Fill in the blanks to complete the story. You should have collected all the information you need on your clue sheet.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles and Practices in the 21St Century
    A1457 Cooperatives: Principles and practices in the 21st century Kimberly A. Zeuli and Robert Cropp ABOUT THE COVER IMAGE: The “twin pines” is a familiar symbol for cooperatives in the United States.The Cooperative League of the USA, which eventually became the National Cooperative Business Association (NCBA), adopted it as their logo in 1922.The pine tree is an ancient symbol of endurance and immor- tality.The two pines represent mutual cooperation—people helping people. C OOPERATIVES: q Publication notes ii C ont Chapter 1 1 An introduction to cooperatives Chapter 2 5 ents Historical development of cooperatives throughout the world Chapter 3 15 Cooperative history, trends, and laws in the United States Chapter 4 27 Cooperative classification Chapter 5 39 Alternative business models in the United States Chapter 6 49 Cooperative roles, responsibilities, and communication Chapter 7 59 Cooperative financial management Chapter 8 69 Procedures for organizing a cooperative Chapter 9 77 A summary of cooperative benefits and limitations Notes 81 Glossary 85 Cooperative resources 89 PRINCIPLES & PRACTICES IN THE 21ST CENTURY i Kimberly Zeuli and Robert Cropp, Assistant Publication notes Professor and Professor Emeritus in the This publication is the fourth and most extensive Department of Agricultural and Applied revision of the Marvin A. Schaars’ text, Cooperatives, Economics, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Principles and Practices, University of Wisconsin are responsible for all of the editing and most Extension—Madison, Publication A1457, July 1980. of the revised text. The following individuals What has come to be known simply as “the also contributed to various chapters: Schaars book,” was originally written in 1936 by David Erickson, Director of Member Relations, Chris L.
    [Show full text]
  • European Cooperative Movement – Background and Common Denominators
    The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University Food and Resource Economic Institute European Cooperative Movement – Background and Common Denominators. Jarka Chloupkova Unit of Economics Working Papers 2002/4 European Cooperative Movement – Background and common denominators By Jarka Chloupková* The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University Department of Economics and Natural Resources E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Influenced by the legacy of command economies, the recent agricultural cooperation in Central and Eastern Europe is, compared to EU countries, marked by a different pattern. Based on simplified ownership incentive approach, this paper distinguishes between the fundamental features of communist, post-communist and democratic cooperatives. While in most Central and Eastern Europe there are more production cooperatives than marketing / supplying (secondary) cooperatives, in EU countries the ratio is reversed in favour of the secondary cooperatives. The more common utilisation of secondary cooperatives that enable a vertical integration might be one of many reasons for more competitive agricultural sector in the EU. Based on circumstantial historical evidence, and the influence of internal and external factors, this paper identifies three common steps that form pre-requisites to a successful cooperative development. The paper closes with noting that these three steps might not be directly applicable to the CEEC situation. * The author would like to thank Ingrid Henriksen, Kostas Karantininis, Niels Kærgård, Karsten Kyed, Henrik B. Olesen and participants of the Øresund Seminar, May 15th, 2002 for valuable comments on earlier versions of the paper. This working paper presents a collection of material for understanding a range of cooperative related issues and subsequently the base for paper entitled as: “Will post-communist cooperatives work?: Social capital dynamics and the performance of cooperatives”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rochdale Principles
    Principle 5 Study Group The Co-operative Movement: Beginnings Part Two The Rochdale Principles Recommended reading: G. D. H. Cole’s very helpful book “A Century Of Co- operation”. It was published in 1944 by the Co-operative Union, Holyoake House, Manchester, to celebrate the Rochdale Pioneers Centenary. Pages 64 – 74 explain the Rochdale principles. https://www.principle5.coop/books/a-century-of-co-operation (21st December 2019 marked the 175th anniversary of the opening of the Toad Lane store). Johnston Birchall’s book ‘Co-op: the people’s business’ is an excellent starting place for anyone wanting to study the Co-operative Movement. The story right from the beginning has a direct bearing on the modern day Co-operative Movement. I would encourage anyone who is interested in the movement to read this book. https://www.principle5.coop/books/co-op-the-peoples-business I have used both these books. Quotations from Birchall, Co-op: the people’s business in blue. 1. Democratic Control. One member one vote irrespective of member’s shareholding or the amount of purchases made in the store. Democracy was at the very root of the agitation for the Charter and an essential foundation for the co-operative. (NOTE: The members of the Co-operative Wholesale Society (CWS) were not individuals but Societies of widely varying scale. In this case, the members voting rights depended on the amount of purchases made from the CWS. This is still the way that the CWS successor ‘The Co-operative Group’ organises voting rights for their corporate members). The Pioneers left very little to chance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Co-Operative Model in Practice
    The Co-operative Model in Practice International perspectives Edited by Diarmuid McDonnell and Elizabeth Macknight The Co-operative Model in Practice: International perspectives A CETS Resource published with the support of the Scottish Government and the Economic and Social Research Council. The Co-operative Model in Practice is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Users are free to copy, distribute and transmit this work, as well as adapt it, as long as the following conditions are met: Attribution – You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Noncommercial – You may not use this work for commercial purposes. Share Alike – If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one. The Co-operative Model in Practice is open access, meaning it is free to download online. Copyright © Selection and editorial matter, Diarmuid McDonnell and Elizabeth Macknight The publisher has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for any external or third-party internet websites referred to in this book, and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate. First published 2012 ISBN 978-0-9555342-3-2 The Co-operative Model in Practice: International perspectives Contents List of figures and tables ii Contributors iii Acknowledgements v Introduction – the co-operative model in practice 1 1. A different commonwealth: the co-operative movement in Scotland 3 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Home Learning
    Year 8 History Revision Booklet 3 1. How did Manchester and Rochdale change during the Industrial Revolution? 2. Why was Jack the Ripper never caught? 3. How have people from Rochdale and Greater Manchester fought for their rights? Home Learning 4. How did WW1 impact the lives of people on the Home and Western Fronts? Task 1 – Key words: give a definition of each of these key terms from the Power and Protest topic. Key words Definitions Protest Suffragette Suffragist Massacre Peterloo Reform Government Democracy Cavalry Hussar Yeomanry Militant Radical Task 2 – Read the information on the next slide about 4 key movements of the 19th and early 20th century. Use 4 colours to highlight the origins, aims, actions and outcomes of each movement. Then compete the PEE paragraph below. Origins – When did it start? Who were the Actions – What methods did they use to Outcomes – What were the consequences of Aims – What did the protesters want to change? leaders? achieve their aims? their protest? Did they achieve their aims? Imagine you are now living back in 19th century Rochdale, you need to decide which of these 4 movement groups you would join and support. Practice your PEE paragraphs to explain why you would join this movement. Remember to include the details of your aims; what methods will you use; and how will you know you have achieved your aims? ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Gillian Lonergan EN
    THE UK CO-OPERATIVE MOVEMENT IN THE XIXTH CENTURY Gillian Lonergan In the UK, the number of co-operative societies increased dramatically during the nineteenth century. It was estimated that there were around 350 co-operatives in the 1830s, by the 1890s, that number was approaching 1,400 with 1 million members. The majority of these were consumer co-operatives but there were producer co-operatives in a wide range of manufacturing sectors. In 1893 Benjamin Jones – who had known several of the Rochdale Pioneers as a young man and later formally opened the Rochdale Pioneers Museum – travelled round the UK finding out about the productive societies, their history and how they operated. His book Co-operative Production is a fascinating read. With the industrial revolution, more people were moving into towns and cities and they needed a supply of good quality unadulterated food at reasonable prices and using fair weights and measures. Working people in the first half of the nineteenth century did not have much control over their lives, as members of a co-operative, they could work towards improving their communities and living conditions. These factors helped to ensure the success of the consumer co-operative model. Consumer co-operatives started to work together, sometimes informally, sometimes in formal arrangements, building a bakery or dairy to serve two or three local societies for example. In 1869, the Co-operative Union, the national co-operative federation was formed at the first of the annual UK Co-operative Congresses. The Co-operative Union helped co-operative societies with information and advice and brought them together in regular meetings so they could learn from and support each other.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Comprehension
    Reading Comprehension Before you read or listen to this storybook, look at the cover. • What do you think the book will be about? • Why do you think so? • Who are the main characters? • Where are they? And when? Arriving at the museum • Where does this story take place? • Why is a museum like a time machine? • What would you expect to find inside? • Can you spot the two main characters? • What does co-operation mean? Dressing up • What kind of shop is this? • What things did it sell? • What happened when the main characters got dressed up as Victorian children? • What time period would you like to visit? Meeting the Pioneers • What happened on 21st December 1844? • Who were the Rochdale Pioneers? • What did they do? • Why did they need to use a wheelbarrow? • Why is their shop now a museum? On Toad Lane • How has this scene changed since 1844? • What can the children smell and hear? • How do you think they are feeling? • What differences can you see between rich and poor people? Child workers • Where are these barefoot children going? • Do you think they are rich or poor? • What kind of work did they do? • Should children be made to work? • Does it still happen today? In the mill • How do the main characters feel now? • Why is the boy in danger? • What other dangers are present? • If you owned the mill what would you do to improve conditions for your workers? By the canal • How much money did the children earn? • Would you choose dry bread as a snack? • What is the horse doing? • Where are the children going? • What might happen if they
    [Show full text]
  • Rochdale Retrospect
    Chapter Six TOWARDS A MUNICIPAL BOROUGH : 1800-1856 A POET SELLS THE MANOR . EORGE GORDON BYRON, sixth Baron Byron of Rochdale, was the last of his family to be Lord of the Rochdale Manor. ; It is well known that he spent much of his time abroad ; in 1810, G aged 22, he swam the Hellespont, in 1822 he attended at Rome the funeral of the drowned Shelley ; it was in the same year, from Genoa, that Byron wrote to James Dearden regarding the thirty-year-old lawsuit over the Rochdale manorial rights and coal mines : " Sir, You and I have now been eighteen years at law with various success . Of the original occasion of this suit I have no great knowledge, since I inherited it and was a child when it began, and for ought I know may arrive at second childhood before it terminates ." He continues, "a mode might be found of combining . the adjustment of our lawsuit and the sale of the remainder of the manor . ", having already mentioned his thoughts of settling permanently in Italy or elsewhere, but, in fact, he had inherited encumbered estates and his own extravagances led him into further debts . In another letter, once in the possession of Mr . A. 3 . Law, he wrote " If we must sell, sell Rochdale ." In 1823 the Manor was sold to James Dear- den, whose house " The Orchard," north of the river and almost opposite that older house " The Wood," became known as " The Manor House ." It would be pleasant to think that Byron, as had been reported, actually stood at the top of the Church Steps and said " Fair breaks the morn o'er the distant hills," but it is difficult enough to establish that he ever came to Rochdale.
    [Show full text]
  • For Coöperation and the Abolition of Capital, Or, How to Get Beyond Our Extractive Punitive Society and Achieve a Just Society
    Columbia Law School Scholarship Archive Faculty Scholarship Faculty Publications 2020 For Coöperation and the Abolition of Capital, Or, How to Get Beyond Our Extractive Punitive Society and Achieve a Just Society Bernard E. Harcourt Columbia Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Banking and Finance Law Commons, Bankruptcy Law Commons, Business Organizations Law Commons, Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Environmental Law Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons, and the Securities Law Commons Recommended Citation Bernard E. Harcourt, For Coöperation and the Abolition of Capital, Or, How to Get Beyond Our Extractive Punitive Society and Achieve a Just Society, COLUMBIA PUBLIC LAW RESEARCH PAPER NO. 14-672 (2020). Available at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/2708 This Working Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at Scholarship Archive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarship Archive. For more information, please contact [email protected]. For Coöperation and the Abolition of Capital Or, How to Get Beyond Our Extractive Punitive Society and Achieve a Just Society Bernard E. Harcourt September 1, 2020 New York, New York Version 1.0 Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3702010 © Bernard E. Harcourt – All Rights
    [Show full text]
  • Consumer Co-Operatives and the Rochdale Principles Today Christopher S
    Osgoode Hall Law Journal Article 5 Volume 15, Number 1 (June 1977) Consumer Co-operatives and the Rochdale Principles Today Christopher S. Axworthy Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj Article Citation Information Axworthy, Christopher S.. "Consumer Co-operatives and the Rochdale Principles Today." Osgoode Hall Law Journal 15.1 (1977) : 137-164. http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj/vol15/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Osgoode Hall Law Journal by an authorized editor of Osgoode Digital Commons. CONSUMER CO-OPERATIVES AND THE ROCHDALE PRNICIPLES TODAY By CHRISTOPHER S. AXWORTHY* A. INTRODUCTION In 1974, Canada's 2,274 co-operatives conducted in excess of $4,930,500,000 worth of business. They had 1,963,000 members and assets of $2,289,400,000.1 There is little doubt, therefore, that they are important constituents of the Canadian economic scene. The first consumer co-operative store in Canada was opened by miners in Stellarton, Nova Scotia. The oldest consumer co-operative still in operation is also in Nova Scotia-the British Canadian Co-operative Society, at Sydney Mines. 2 The most successful, however, is the Calgary Co-operative Associa- tion, with sales in 1974 of $61.5 million and more than 100,000 members.8 In spite of the obvious monetary importance of co-operatives generally, no definition appears to have universal, or even widespread, acceptance. Paul Lambert, Professor of Economics at Liege, Belgium, and a noted co-operative theorist, in Studies In The Social Philosophy of Co-operation, defines a co- operative as "an enterprise formed and directed by an association of users, applying within itself the rules of democracy, and directly intended to serve both its own members and the community as a whole."4 This statement illustrates a number of important aspects.
    [Show full text]