American Movie Critics : an Anthology from the Silents Until Now Pdf, Epub, Ebook
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
AMERICAN MOVIE CRITICS : AN ANTHOLOGY FROM THE SILENTS UNTIL NOW PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Phillip Lopate | 750 pages | 24 Jan 2008 | The Library of America | 9781598530223 | English | New York, United States American Movie Critics : An Anthology from the Silents Until Now PDF Book Apr 26, Richard rated it really liked it. On "Lola Montes" he was out on his own. Previous volumes are in SML. Read it Forward Read it first. Edited by Philip Lopate. Variety Those judgments might have been right or wrong, but they were seldom crazy, unless the critic had a theory of his or her own. The making of George Stevens' Texas-sized epic is recounted in Don Graham's meticulously chronicled book. Nora rated it really liked it Nov 20, Mencken, Susan Sontag, and John Ashbery, weighing in on a range of cinematic experiences. As a first qualification, Ferguson could see that there was such a thing as a hierarchy of trash. Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Lubitsch's Timeless Appeal. Similarly, if you know too much about the movies but not enough about the world, you won't be able to see that "Downfall" is dangerously sentimental. What I'm seeing is a whole thing on its own. Some of the best non-fiction writers of the twentieth century are represented here. Thursday, April 13, Phillip Lopate. Aug 09, Anna-Lisa rated it it was amazing. She lives in Los Angeles with her husband. At an age when most people are thinking about retirement, Clint Eastwood just keeps getting better. It's a neat progression, but this book, simply by its layout, shows it to be bogus. No trivia or quizzes yet. After working with children for twelve years as a writer in the schools, he taught creative writing and literature at Fordham, Cooper Union, University of Houston, and New York University. Several of the post-World War I critics will come as revelations to anybody who assumed, as many of us have long been led to assume, that America was slow to discover the fruitfulness of its own cinema. Ozer Publication Date: You have to have the sensory equipment. Here too are notable American writers, including Carl Sandburg, H. Though critics can at times seem like a filmmaker's worst enemy, it is also true, as evidenced by this collection, that they can be the medium's biggest champions and most articulate chroniclers. Schickel is presently writing the film biography of actor, director and producer Clint Eastwood. An essential component of any cinephile's library, I'd say. One look at the relevant piece will tell you why a critic has to know about the world as well as the movies: Tolson could see that "GWTW" was well made. Jonathan Lethem. Then, after World War II, when victory in Europe could well have led the liberated nations to sneer in resentment at the triumph of American might, generous young French critics armed with the auteur theory discovered that a cluster, or pantheon, of directors within the Hollywood system had always been major artists too: Nicholas Ray was up there with Carl Dreyer, and so on. But it was also written by people who don't know half enough about politics. No matter how many movies you have seen, they won't give you the truth of the matter, because it can't be shown as action. It took a theory to work the switch, and the essence of the auteur theory was that the director, the controlling hand, shaped the movie with his artistic personality even if it was made within a commercial system as businesslike as Hollywood's. The important consideration here is that everything these superior minds approved of in the foreign art film they also looked for diligently in the American industrial product, and were touchingly glad to find any signs of its flowering. As this Taschen volume makes clear, the Master of Suspense remains appealing to cineastes young and old, with plus features underscoring his timeless ingenuity. In my nonhumble ticket purchaser's opinion, the great Stanley K. Add to cart. It quickly becomes obvious that those without theories write better. See more articles from Books. Criticism Paperback 1st Edition Books. His selected film criticism appeared in Totally Tenderly Tragically , and he currently serves on the selection committee of the New York Film Festival. And Stanley Kauffmann isn't in it enough. Nov 15, Bob rated it it was amazing. Be the first to know! Film Literature Index Showing American Movie Critics : An Anthology from the Silents Until Now Writer To me, the answer looks like less, but it could be that I just don't like it when a critic's hulking voice gets in the way of the projector beam and tries to convince me that what I am looking at makes its real sense only as part of a bigger pattern of thought, that pattern being available from the critic's mind at the price of decoding his prose. In "American Movie Critics," a Library of America collection drawn from the work of almost 70 high-profile professional critics active at various times since their preferred medium was invented the day before yesterday - the whole history of narrative movies for exhibition still fits inside a mere hundred years - most of the practitioners fall neatly into one category or the other. But as a man who can create figures, intricate, unpredictable, constantly varied and yet simple, seemingly effortless. Be the first to know! Show More Show Less. In my nonhumble ticket purchaser's opinion, the great Stanley K. Here are some books you can read in a day , if you want a sense of accomplishment. Writing about the movies was an occasion for male writers to be, as they say now, vulnerable and, more important perhaps, for women writers to let their hair down. No story, no movie. As the World Burns. Schickel is presently writing the film biography of actor, director and producer Clint Eastwood. Jem and the Holograms: Dimensions. Similarly, if you know too much about the movies but not enough about the world, you won't be able to see that "Downfall" is dangerously sentimental. Those judgments might have been right or wrong, but they were seldom crazy, unless the critic had a theory of his or her own. See all 13 - All listings for this product. Inspired by Your Browsing History. None of them had any real trouble figuring out what the commercial filmmakers were up to. Hear how he rounds it out: "Fred Astaire, whatever he may do in whatever picture he is in, has the beat, the swing, the debonair and damn-your-eyes violence of rhythm, all the gay contradiction and irresponsibility, of the best thing this country can contribute to musical history, which is the best American jazz. For assistance, contact your corporate administrator. Batgirl Vol. There have been plenty of editors who didn't get it. But the same is true of every good critic. LitFlash The eBooks you want at the lowest prices. Edited by Philip Lopate. There have been plenty of editors who didn't get it. Dance Man. But in the movies they are. His prose was bad poetry, like his poetry. Hawkman Vol. In our appreciation of the arts, does a theory give us more to think about, or less? What I'm seeing is a whole thing on its own. What I'm seeing is a whole thing on its own. There were and there still are. Please log in. Description: CalArts president Steven D. Phillip Lopate. You are no longer onsite at your organization. And Agee, as well as possessing the comprehensive intelligence that the critical heritage had already made a requirement, also possessed an extra quality that we later on, and perhaps dangerously, came to expect from everybody: he had the wit. Sandburg is unreadable today only because of the way he wrote. Lars Martinson. You may also like. Motion pictures--Brazil--Reviews. The poet Carl Sandburg, sounding surprisingly like a teenage horror fan, rhapsodizes about The Cabinet of Dr. Mencken was the perennial star reporter-cum-philologist of the American language, Gilbert Seldes wrote about all of what he christened "the lively arts," Robert E. No, certain. Here are the 10 Best Books of , along with Notable Books of the year. But when Bresson, somewhere in the vicinity of Camelot, reached the point where almost nothing happening became nothing happening at all, you were gone. And Peter Bogdanovich - surely a key figure, and not just as an archivist, in the appreciation of American movies - is another conspicuous absentee. Well, it couldn't have; but to know why that is so, you have to have read a few books. American Movie Critics : An Anthology from the Silents Until Now Reviews The real question is why none of it saps my willingness to be involved, not even Sean Connery's shtrangely shibilant Shcottish ackshent as the commander of a Shoviet shubmarine, not even that spliced-in footage of the same old Grumman F9F Panther that has been crashing into the aircraft carrier's deck since the Korean War. Lots of insightful reviews, but in a book this size there are some long-winded dissections and individuals styles that made me give up and bump to the next. Great collection of reviews and writings on film from the cinema's inception or rather, consideration as a serious art form, to the present day. That principle really starts to matter when it comes to movies that profess to understand history, and thus to affect the future.