Southern Review": an Episode in Southern Intellectual History, 1935-1942
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1980 The S" outhern Review": an Episode in Southern Intellectual History, 1935-1942. Ronda Cabot Tentarelli Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Tentarelli, Ronda Cabot, "The S" outhern Review": an Episode in Southern Intellectual History, 1935-1942." (1980). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 3576. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/3576 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark it is an indication that the film inspector noticed either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, or duplicate copy. Unless we meant to delete copyrighted materials that should not have been Rimed, you will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photo graphed the photographer has followed a definite method in “sectioning” the material. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. For any illustrations that cannot be reproduced satisfactorily by xerography, photographic prints can be purchased at additional cost and tipped into your xerographic copy. Requests can be made to our Dissertations Customer Services Department. 5. Some pages in any document may have indistinct print. In all cases we have filmed the best available copy. University M icrofilms International 300 N. ZEEB ROAD, ANN ARBOR, Ml 48106 18 BEDFORD ROW, LONDON WC1R 4EJ, ENGLAND 8110430 T e ntarelli, R o n d a C abot THE "SOUTHERN REVIEW": AN EPISODE IN SOUTHERN INTELLECTUAL HISTORY, 1935-1942 The Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical Ph.D. Col. 1980 University Microfilms International300 N. Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48106 Copyright 1981 by Tentarelli, Ronda Cabot All Rights Reserved THE SOUTHERN REVIEW: AN EPISODE ST SOUTHERN INTELLECTUAL HISTORY, 1935-1942 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by Ronda Cabot Tentarelli B.A., Reed College, 1974 M.A., Louisiana State University, 1976 December 1980 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS As is anyone who earns a Ph.D., I am indebted to many people for their various forms of assistance. I am especially beholding to Drs. Burl Noggle and Lewis P., Simpson for their insistence on the importance of this project and their careful attention to my work throughout my career as a graduate student. The other members of my committee, Drs. M. T. Carleton, Gary A. Crump, and Anne C. Loveland, have provided help in many ways, some of which they are probably unaware. Dr. John Loos, Chairman of the Department of History, has also been very en couraging, as was the late T. Harry Williams. Louis D. Rubin, Jr., and Cleanth Brooks graciously assented to interviews, and my conversations with them added inestimably to the dissertation. I was unable to discuss the Southern Re view with Robert Penn Warren, but his contributions to Southern letters supplied an inspiration that would otherwise have been lacking. My fellow graduate students in the History department at LSU have made acquiring a doctorate a very enjoyable experience. The discussions of baseball and movies with close friends prob ably had more to do with this dissertation that any one of us realizes. Graduate school, certainly, would not have been as much fun without our conversations, and the dissertation would iii not have been however good it is without my colleagues' encouragement. My parents, Lloyd H. Cabot and Marlene C. Finell, of course, have contributed in a more intangible fashion. Their respect for education, their financial and emotional support, and their love of history and literature are just a few of the many things they have given me. Of all the people I might mention I owe the most to my grandmother, Lillian Feldman, and my husband, Vincent Michael Tentarelli. My grandmother has long dreamed of a granddaughter with a doctorate, and I am happy if only because I was somehow able to make that dream come true. As for Vincent, his sar castic (I trust) remarks regarding the value, or lack thereof, of history, his incessant nagging at me to do my work, and his refusal to invest his entire person in my academic career, mean more to me than anything else. PREFACE In the spring of 1935 a new type of literary magazine appeared. Unlike the old literary quarterlies such as the Dial and the Hound and the Horn, it discussed political and economic matters. Unlike the more political magazines such as the New Republic and the New Masses, it discussed liter ature outside of a political context. Unlike older journals of the South such as the Sewanee Review and the Virginia Quar terly Magazine, this new journal self-consciously related poetry and politics to the twentieth-century South. This new literary magazine was the Southern Review, published by Louis iana State University from 1935 to 1942. If for no other reason, the Southern Review is important in the history of American literaty magazines. The Review merits consideration on other grounds as well. To begin with, it was a significant part of the so-called Southern Renascence, that apparently sudden and sustained literary activity that began in the late 1920s and ended sometime after World War II. The same forces that produced the Renascence in general brought forth the Southern Review in particular. Thus we can examine the Review in the same way we might examine Absalom! Absalom! or "Ode to the Confederate Dead," as a product of certain non- literary forces acting upon Southern thinkers in the first part iv i V of the twentieth century. In addition to being another of the literary commodities of the period, the Southern Review actively participated in the Southern Renascence. It published the fiction, poetry, and criticism of several major Southern writers. It evaluated these works in critical articles. And it introduced several new Southern authors to American readers. The magazine also shared with the Southern Renascence a point of view. The important writers of this period found the material promises of the "New South" neither real nor de sirable. Instead, these people and the editors of the Review regarded the relationships between past and present, tradition and change, individual and community as central to modern lit erature and society. They felt that exchanging a traditional past for modern conveniences and a higher standard of living was a bad bargain. They had sincere doubts about the advan tages of industrialism and capitalism, and they resented the control that cities of the northeast had over the literary marketplace. This distrust of the American economic and social system brings the Review out of a strictly Southern arena and places it in the midst of American intellectual history in the 1930s. Throughout the decade writers analyzed American society and found it lacking in one way or another. Most historians agree, however, that intellectuals in the 19 30s generally drifted toward the left of the political spectrum, the left ranging from the more socialistic aspects of the New Deal to communism. vi Although the Southern Review did not present only one opinion on the matter, and in fact published articlies by socialist Norman Thomas, Marxist Frederic Schuman, and leftist Sidney Hook, its perspective lay definitely to the right of most American thought in the period. In this way the Review serves as an interesting counterpoint to the mainstream of American intellectual activity in the thirties. In order to substantiate these claims of the Southern Review1s importance, I will examine the magazine's historical context and its contents. I do not intend to present an ac count of the history of the Southern Review — that has been done. Rather, I want to put the Southern Review in the context of American and Southern intellectual history in the 1930s and to analyze its contents as an expression of the specific themes and points of view of the Southern Renascence. This will in clude the examination of what appear to be strictly literary matters, but, as I trust will be made clear, strictly liter ary matters often have extra-literary implications, even for New Critics. ABSTRACT This is a study of the Southern Review, a cultural quarterly published at Louisiana State University from 1935 to 1942, and edited by Charles Pipkin, Cleanth Brooks, and Robert Penn Warren.