DOCSLIB.ORG

Labour Commitments to FOI

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Campaign for Freedom of Information Suite 102, 16 Baldwins Gardens, London EC1N 7RJ Tel: 020 7831 7477 Fax: 020 7831 7461 Email: [email protected] Web: www.cfoi.org.uk Labour Commitments to Freedom of Information 12 September 2000 rev. 2.0 Hon. President: Godfrey Bradman Parliamentary Co-Chairs: Helen Jackson MP Co-Chairs: James Cornford, Neil McIntosh Archy Kirkwood MP Director: Maurice Frankel Richard Shepherd MP Campaign for Freedom of Information Ltd. Registered in England no. 1781526. Registered office as above Labour Commitments to Freedom of Information General Election Manifesto Pledges October 1974 Promised to “replace the Official Secrets Act by a measure to put the burden on the public authorities to justify withholding information.” April 1979 “In central Government, we will... Introduce a Freedom of Information Bill to provide a system of open government, and enact proposals made by the Government in its White Paper to reform Section Two of the Official Secrets Act.” June 1983 “Labour will take action to enhance democratic rights and ensure greater openness and accountability in the institutions of government... We shall introduce a Freedom of Information Bill, providing for a genuine system of open government and placing the onus on the authorities to justify withholding information.” June 1987 “…the new Parliament will swiftly enact many…worthwhile measures. These will cost little to implement but produce significant improvement in the quality of administration, provision and response to the needs of ordinary citizens. They will include: A Freedom of Information Act, to be accompanied by the repeal of Section Two of the Official Secrets Act.” March 1992 “We will start in our first parliamentary session with a Freedom of Information Act which will open up government to the people. Exceptions will be tightly drawn.” April 1997 Introduction by Tony Blair: “Labour is committed to the democratic renewal of our country through decentralisation and the elimination of excessive government secrecy.” “We are pledged to a Freedom of Information Act, leading to more open government.” Labour Policy Documents December 1997 “This White Paper explains our proposals for meeting another key pledge - to legislate for freedom of information, bringing about more open government. The traditional culture of secrecy will only be broken down by giving people in the United Kingdom the legal right to know. This fundamental and vital change in the relationship between government and governed is at the heart of this White Paper.” Preface by Tony Blair, ‘Your Right to Know’, Cm 3818 December 1997 “This White Paper marks a watershed in the relationship between the government and the people of the United Kingdom. At last there is a government ready to trust the people with a legal right to know. This right is central to a mature democracy… It is a new balance with the scales now weighted decisively in favour of openness.” Foreword by David Clark, ‘Your Right to Know, Cm 3818’ 2 September 1996 “Government is too secretive. Too many decisions are taken behind closed doors without proper consultation with the public. Government then rushes new laws through Parliament and bad legislation is passed. People want to be better informed about what government is up to, and be consulted more. New rules on government openness are needed.” “We will introduce a Freedom of Information Act to stop unnecessary secretiveness in government. This will establish a general right of access to official information held by national, regional and local public bodies, including quangos....” New Politics New Britain: Restoring Trust in the way we are Governed, by Jack Straw, Doug Henderson and Derek Foster September 1991 “The Labour government will introduce a package of reforms designed to strengthen editorial independence, including a Freedom of Information Act and the replacement of the Official Secrets Act.” Arts and Media: Our Cultural Future January 1991 “Labour will introduce a Freedom of Information Act which establishes a general right of access to official information held by national regional and local governments and by public and statutory bodies.” The Charter of Rights Freedom of Information Bills promoted by Labour MPs November 1998 Freedom of Information Bill, introduced by Labour MP Andrew Mackinlay. Labour sponsors included Dr David Clark, Mark Fisher, Chris Mullin, Tony Wright, Rhodri Morgan and Ronnie Campbell June 1992 Right to Know Bill, introduced by Labour MP Mark Fisher. Labour sponsors included Clare Short, Chris Smith, Alistair Darling, Jeff Rooker and Clive Soley February 1992 Right to Information Bill, Labour front bench bill introduced by Robin Corbett. Sponsors included Neil Kinnock, Roy Hattersley, Alistair Darling, Stuart Randall, Joan Lestor, Eric Illsley and Andrew Bennett December 1991 Freedom of Information Bill, introduced by Archy Kirkwood (Lib). Labour sponsors included Chris Smith and Jeff Rooker July 1984 Freedom of Information (No 2) Bill, introduced by David Steel (Lib). Labour sponsors included Bruce George and Robin Corbett January 1981 Freedom of Information Bill, introduced by Labour MP Frank Hooley. Labour sponsors included Robin Cook, Michael Meacher, Jeff Rooker, Christopher Price and Philip Whitehead July 1979 Freedom of Information Bill, introduced by Michael Meacher. Labour sponsors included Robin Cook, Christopher Price and Phillip Whitehead January 1979 Official Information Bill, introduced by Clement Freud (Lib). Labour sponsors included Robin Cook and Jeff Rooker 3 July 1978 Official Information Bill, introduced by Robin Cook. Labour sponsors included Jeff Rooker, Jo Richardson, Robert Kilroy-Silk, Max Madden, Christopher Price, Ronald Atkins, George Cunningham and Tom Litterick December 1977 Freedom of Information Bill, introduced by Labour MP Ronald Atkins. Labour sponsors included Robin Cook, Robin Corbett, Tom Litterick and Dennis Canavan February 1977 Freedom of Information and Privacy Bill introduced by Labour MP Tom Litterick. Ministerial Statements Tony Blair, Prime Minister 10/10/97 “The new Labour Government is committed to a major decentralisation and devolution of power across the United Kingdom, as well as to a Freedom of Information Act. I believe that by bringing decision-making closer to the people, we will be better able to protect their fundamental rights and freedoms.” Speech at the Council of Europe Summit, Strasbourg 20/2/97 “We also propose a Freedom of Information Act to open up our secretive processes. After the Scott inquiry, can anyone be in any serious doubt that such an Act is necessary?” Opposition Day debate on the constitution 14/9/96 “The case for a Freedom of Information Act and the incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights into British law is now generally agreed outside the Conservative Party and even by some within it.” The Economist Summer 1996 “It is time to sweep away the cobwebs of secrecy which hang over far too much government activity. If trust in the people means anything then there can be no argument against a Freedom of Information Act.” Progress Magazine 25/3/96 “...I think it is true to say that... the efforts of the Campaign have kept this issue high on the political agenda and we now have a situation where action on this issue is supported by four voters in five. It is not some isolated constitutional reform that we are proposing with a Freedom of Information Act. It is a change that is absolutely fundamental to how we see politics developing in this country over the next few years... When a health scare like BSE occurs, the public want to know the facts, people want to know what the scientific advice is in full, and they need to be sure that the public interest has always come first. They want to know if there was any relaxation of regulations which resulted in public safety being compromised. They want to know what the risks are and whether the food they eat and the food they feed to their children is safe, and they want to know how to find out. And the whole sorry saga of how this matter has been handled has resulted in the loss of public trust in government. It is because we have given so many absolute assurances in the past, so categorically, without necessarily providing the information to back it up that there is such little faith in what is said now. The 4 only way to begin to restore people’s trust is therefore to be completely open about what the risks are... The crucial question is does the government regard people’s involvement in politics as being restricted to periodic elections? Or, does it regard itself as in some sense in a genuine partnership with people? And the government’s attitude to what it is prepared to tell people and the knowledge it will share with them says a great deal about where it stands on that matter. My argument is that if a government is genuine about wanting a partnership with the people who it is governing, then the act of government itself must be seen in some sense as a shared responsibility and the government has to empower the people and give them a say in how that politics is conducted. In today’s world, I believe that there is a limit to what government can do, and the power of society or community to act and to influence the lives of the individuals within it depends on a far more diverse and diffuse set of relationships than, if you like, a concept of government that would have been more natural or more easily explicable forty or fifty years ago. I don’t believe it is possible for government to govern effectively now, unless it governs in some sense in a relationship of partnership with the people whom it is governing. It is one of the reasons why decentralisation of power is actually in the interests of government.
Recommended publications
  • Durham Research Online

    Durham Research Online

    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 11 October 2011 Version of attached le: Published Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Masterman, R. and Mitchell, J. (2001) 'Devolution and the centre.', in The state of the nations 2001 : the second year of devolution in the United Kingdom. Thorverton: Imprint Academic, pp. 175-196. Further information on publisher's website: http://www.booksonix.com/imprint/bookshop/ Publisher's copyright statement: Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk 8 Devolution and the Centre' Roger Masterman and James Mitchell INTRODUCTION Much of the debate on devolution before the enactment of the various pieces of devolution legislation was parochial. It had been parochial in concentrat- ing on the opportunities, problems and implications of devolution within Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland; little attention had been paid to devo- lution's impact UK on the as a whole or on the `centre' - Whitehall and Westminster.
  • Crossing the Floor Roy Douglas a Failure of Leadership Liberal Defections 1918–29 Senator Jerry Grafstein Winston Churchill As a Liberal J

    Crossing the Floor Roy Douglas a Failure of Leadership Liberal Defections 1918–29 Senator Jerry Grafstein Winston Churchill As a Liberal J

    Journal of Issue 25 / Winter 1999–2000 / £5.00 Liberal DemocratHISTORY Crossing the Floor Roy Douglas A Failure of Leadership Liberal Defections 1918–29 Senator Jerry Grafstein Winston Churchill as a Liberal J. Graham Jones A Breach in the Family Megan and Gwilym Lloyd George Nick Cott The Case of the Liberal Nationals A re-evaluation Robert Maclennan MP Breaking the Mould? The SDP Liberal Democrat History Group Issue 25: Winter 1999–2000 Journal of Liberal Democrat History Political Defections Special issue: Political Defections The Journal of Liberal Democrat History is published quarterly by the Liberal Democrat History Group 3 Crossing the floor ISSN 1463-6557 Graham Lippiatt Liberal Democrat History Group Editorial The Liberal Democrat History Group promotes the discussion and research of 5 Out from under the umbrella historical topics, particularly those relating to the histories of the Liberal Democrats, Liberal Tony Little Party and the SDP. The Group organises The defection of the Liberal Unionists discussion meetings and publishes the Journal and other occasional publications. 15 Winston Churchill as a Liberal For more information, including details of publications, back issues of the Journal, tape Senator Jerry S. Grafstein records of meetings and archive and other Churchill’s career in the Liberal Party research sources, see our web site: www.dbrack.dircon.co.uk/ldhg. 18 A failure of leadership Hon President: Earl Russell. Chair: Graham Lippiatt. Roy Douglas Liberal defections 1918–29 Editorial/Correspondence Contributions to the Journal – letters, 24 Tory cuckoos in the Liberal nest? articles, and book reviews – are invited. The Journal is a refereed publication; all articles Nick Cott submitted will be reviewed.
  • Harold Wilson Obituary

    Harold Wilson Obituary

    Make a contribution News Opinion Sport Culture Lifestyle UK World Business Football UK politics Environment Education Society Science Tech More Harold Wilson obituary Leading Labour beyond pipe dreams Geoffrey Goodman Thu 25 May 1995 09.59 EDT 18 Lord Wilson of Rievaulx, as he came improbably to be called - will not go down in the history books as one of Britain's greatest prime ministers. But, increasingly, he will be seen as a far bigger political figure than contemporary sceptics have allowed far more representative of that uniquely ambivalent mood of Britain in the 1960s and a far more rounded and caring, if unfulfilled, person. It is my view that he was a remarkable prime minister and, indeed, a quite remarkable man. Cynics had a field day ridiculing him at the time of his decline. Perhaps that was inevitable given his irresistible tendency to behave like the master of the Big Trick in the circus ring of politics - for whom there is nothing so humiliating as to have it demonstrated, often by fellow tricksters, that the Big Trick hasn't worked. James Harold Wilson happened to be prime minister leading a left wing party at a time when the mores of post-war political and economic change in Britain (and elsewhere) were just beginning to be perceived. Arguably it was the period of the greatest social and industrial change this century, even if the people - let alone the Wilson governments - were never fully aware of the nature of that change. Social relationships across the entire class spectrum were being transformed.
  • Z675928x Margaret Hodge Mp 06/10/2011 Z9080283 Lorely

    Z675928x Margaret Hodge Mp 06/10/2011 Z9080283 Lorely

    Z675928X MARGARET HODGE MP 06/10/2011 Z9080283 LORELY BURT MP 08/10/2011 Z5702798 PAUL FARRELLY MP 09/10/2011 Z5651644 NORMAN LAMB 09/10/2011 Z236177X ROBERT HALFON MP 11/10/2011 Z2326282 MARCUS JONES MP 11/10/2011 Z2409343 CHARLOTTE LESLIE 12/10/2011 Z2415104 CATHERINE MCKINNELL 14/10/2011 Z2416602 STEPHEN MOSLEY 18/10/2011 Z5957328 JOAN RUDDOCK MP 18/10/2011 Z2375838 ROBIN WALKER MP 19/10/2011 Z1907445 ANNE MCINTOSH MP 20/10/2011 Z2408027 IAN LAVERY MP 21/10/2011 Z1951398 ROGER WILLIAMS 21/10/2011 Z7209413 ALISTAIR CARMICHAEL 24/10/2011 Z2423448 NIGEL MILLS MP 24/10/2011 Z2423360 BEN GUMMER MP 25/10/2011 Z2423633 MIKE WEATHERLEY MP 25/10/2011 Z5092044 GERAINT DAVIES MP 26/10/2011 Z2425526 KARL TURNER MP 27/10/2011 Z242877X DAVID MORRIS MP 28/10/2011 Z2414680 JAMES MORRIS MP 28/10/2011 Z2428399 PHILLIP LEE MP 31/10/2011 Z2429528 IAN MEARNS MP 31/10/2011 Z2329673 DR EILIDH WHITEFORD MP 31/10/2011 Z9252691 MADELEINE MOON MP 01/11/2011 Z2431014 GAVIN WILLIAMSON MP 01/11/2011 Z2414601 DAVID MOWAT MP 02/11/2011 Z2384782 CHRISTOPHER LESLIE MP 04/11/2011 Z7322798 ANDREW SLAUGHTER 05/11/2011 Z9265248 IAN AUSTIN MP 08/11/2011 Z2424608 AMBER RUDD MP 09/11/2011 Z241465X SIMON KIRBY MP 10/11/2011 Z2422243 PAUL MAYNARD MP 10/11/2011 Z2261940 TESSA MUNT MP 10/11/2011 Z5928278 VERNON RODNEY COAKER MP 11/11/2011 Z5402015 STEPHEN TIMMS MP 11/11/2011 Z1889879 BRIAN BINLEY MP 12/11/2011 Z5564713 ANDY BURNHAM MP 12/11/2011 Z4665783 EDWARD GARNIER QC MP 12/11/2011 Z907501X DANIEL KAWCZYNSKI MP 12/11/2011 Z728149X JOHN ROBERTSON MP 12/11/2011 Z5611939 CHRIS
  • Contemporary Perspectives and Engagements of Post-Crisis Social Movements Within the British Welfare State

    Contemporary Perspectives and Engagements of Post-Crisis Social Movements Within the British Welfare State

    Policy, protest and power: contemporary perspectives and engagements of post-crisis social movements within the British welfare state Gregory White PhD University of York Social Policy and Social Work March 2017 2 In memory of Mark Fisher (1968 – 2017) & Dedicated to the international anti-fascist movement 3 4 “Normally, when one challenges the conventional wisdom – that the current economic and political system is the only possible one – the first reaction you are likely to get is a demand for a detailed architectural blueprint of how an alternative system would work, down to the nature of its financial instruments, energy supplies, and policies of sewer maintenance. Next, one is likely to be asked for a detailed program of how this system will be brought into existence. Historically, this is ridiculous.” David Graeber “If, in fact, representational politics is only unreasonable, then it is to… moments of rational disruption, those events and occurrences that interrupt the everyday flow of a political discourse which thinks it’s being practical but is… incredibly unstable, that a true kind of [liberation] emerges.” Nina Power 5 6 Abstract Contemporary social policy in the UK is at a critical impasse: the ongoing government austerity programme has presented an unprecedented challenge to civil society organisations, trade unions and social movements as to questions of social justice and inequality. These challenges have manifested as: (1) tackling entrenched neoliberal narratives surrounding the welfare state; (2) organising and coordinating direct action and a (non-) institutional response. From the perspective of post-crisis social movements (such as Occupy London and UK Uncut), there has been a focus on non- institutional methods – often manifested in the form of direct action – to address social and economic injustices.
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)

    Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)

    Friday Volume 571 29 November 2013 No. 85 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Friday 29 November 2013 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2013 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 527 29 NOVEMBER 2013 528 House of Commons European Union (Referendum) Bill Further consideration of Bill, not amended in the Public Bill Committee Friday 29 November 2013 Clause 1 The House met at half-past Nine o’clock REFERENDUM ON THE UNITED KINGDOM’S PRAYERS MEMBERSHIP OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Amendment proposed: 35, page 1, leave out lines 8 and 9 and insert [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] ‘Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union?’.—(Mike Gapes.) BILL PRESENTED Question put, That the amendment be made. The House proceeded to a Division. UNITED KINGDOM PARLIAMENT (SOVEREIGNTY)BILL Presentation and First Reading (Standing Order No. 57) Mr Speaker: I ask the Serjeant at Arms to investigate Mr William Cash, supported by Mr Bernard Jenkin, the delay in both the Aye and No Lobbies. Mr John Redwood, Sir Edward Leigh, Sir Gerald Howarth, The House having divided: Ayes 3, Noes 244. Mr John Baron, Mr Peter Bone, Jacob Rees-Mogg, Henry Smith, Chris Heaton-Harris, Mr James Clappison Division No. 141] [9.35 am and Sir Richard Shepherd, presented a Bill to make provision for the supremacy of the sovereignty of the AYES United Kingdom Parliament in relation to the United Bailey, Mr Adrian Tellers for the Ayes: Kingdom’s membership of the European Union; and Gapes, Mike Susan Elan Jones and for connected purposes.
  • 39 Mcnally Radice Friends and Rivals Review

    39 Mcnally Radice Friends and Rivals Review

    REVIEWS the result is a refreshing mix Dr Tim Benson is Director of the that makes fascinating reading Political Cartoon Society, an organi- for anyone interested in cur- sation for those interested in history rent affairs, one which will also and politics through the medium of be appreciated by students of cartoons. politics, history, journalism and Visit www.politicalcartoon.co.uk cartoon art. When personal ambitions collide, mutual co-operation is precluded Giles Radice: Friends and Rivals: Crosland, Jenkins and Healey (Little, Brown & Co., 2002), 382 pp. Reviewed by Tom McNally et us start with the con- narrative parallels Dangerfield’s clusion. Giles Radice has The Strange Death of Liberal Eng- Lwritten an important land in seeking to explain how book, a very readable book and both a political establishment and one that entirely justifies the a political philosophy lost its way. many favourable reviews it has I watched this story unfold received since its publication in first of all as a Labour Party re- September 2002. By the device searcher in the mid- and late them. In that respect Tony Blair of interweaving the careers and sixties, then as International Sec- and Gordon Brown did learn the ambitions of Anthony Crosland, retary of the Labour Party from lessons of history by cementing Roy Jenkins and Denis Healey, 1969–74 (the youngest since their own non-aggression pact, Radice is able to tell the tale of Denis Healey, who served in the and reaped their full reward for the rise and fall of social democ- post from 1945–52), followed by so doing.
  • TOP SELLOUT PAGES 4 and 5 State Pays

    TOP SELLOUT PAGES 4 and 5 State Pays

    ODESIA CRISIS - THOMSON TI ODESIA CRISIS - THOMSON TI M CAMPAIGN LAUNCHED TO KS WITH SMITH 'TOP SELLOUT PAGES 4 AND 5 State pays out on torture claim A SOUTH AFRICAN Supreme Court case in which Ovambea held under the Terrorism Act leged crueand brutl assaults -including electric shock torture - by members of the Security Branch, has been settled out of court. The South African Government last month paid bout £1,80 towards the costs of an urgent applicatlion, made in December last year for a court order to protect a 68-yearold OG'v. delanee. Gabriel Mbitdi, from aaults by the Police. The mtoney has beeu,-paid -without prejudiee a wand tdt any asos whatever of the truth of correctnessof the afideavts filed 1.u oinaof the apiplication, especilly to relation to alleged asiiaulb Mbindl was released from Jail inFebrsary thi yot, after having been held as a 'witness cor ight-aad-a-b.1f moaths. He was nsh charged hnd was paid sout £45 'witiressO fees n his release. The application was brought tort'mb ityuwete. than appearing to court Terrorism At. It cited he )f Justice and polle officins as the day, but sh il looms foir Cleaver I DGE CLEAVER, 32,ar-eld eaeBak Panther lada r d sir edntor of RaompartsMagauno utaned with so erly raters to jl in Caifornia, as hs trial an atempted wards ehares oresAs tO pross whae raeiaved an uorent appel fromn t e atioal Comtee to dafuad ldridae r, for help in the tawgous so kep hisn m at of jap owr to his trial.
  • Thecoalition

    Thecoalition

    The Coalition Voters, Parties and Institutions Welcome to this interactive pdf version of The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Please note that in order to view this pdf as intended and to take full advantage of the interactive functions, we strongly recommend you open this document in Adobe Acrobat. Adobe Acrobat Reader is free to download and you can do so from the Adobe website (click to open webpage). Navigation • Each page includes a navigation bar with buttons to view the previous and next pages, along with a button to return to the contents page at any time • You can click on any of the titles on the contents page to take you directly to each article Figures • To examine any of the figures in more detail, you can click on the + button beside each figure to open a magnified view. You can also click on the diagram itself. To return to the full page view, click on the - button Weblinks and email addresses • All web links and email addresses are live links - you can click on them to open a website or new email <>contents The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Edited by: Hussein Kassim Charles Clarke Catherine Haddon <>contents Published 2012 Commissioned by School of Political, Social and International Studies University of East Anglia Norwich Design by Woolf Designs (www.woolfdesigns.co.uk) <>contents Introduction 03 The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Introduction The formation of the Conservative-Liberal In his opening paper, Bob Worcester discusses Democratic administration in May 2010 was a public opinion and support for the parties in major political event.
  • FPC Event 28/5/04 8:59 Am Page 1

    FPC Event 28/5/04 8:59 Am Page 1

    FPC Event 28/5/04 8:59 am Page 1 The Global Exchange Forum Social Capital: A policy tool for North and South? Conference Report On March 29th 2004, The Foreign Policy Centre, commissioned by the Barrow Cadbury Trust, convened a conference to discuss the potential of social capital as a policy tool for Northern and Southern policymaking communities. Participants included representatives from governments, NGOs and the academic world in Europe, Latin America, the Middle East and Africa, as well as senior officials from both the Cabinet Office and Home Office in the UK. The aim of the conference was to improve channels of communication between these communities and create networks between Northern and Southern policy practitioners. Sessions explored ways in which social capital has been understood in different contexts and how it has been applied in key policy areas. In particular, the event focused on three areas: the empowerment of women, conflict resolution and diversity. Speakers ranged from political figures such as Barbara Roche MP and the Brazilian Minister for Race Relations, Matilde Ribeiro, to leading experts such as Anthony Giddens, Ted Cantle, Michael Woolcock and David Halpern, among others. FPC Event 28/5/04 8:59 am Page 2 some light on the policy applications of social capital that Foreword emerged from the workshops. Her comments are drawn from experiences of projects from Northern Ireland, the Middle East, Sri Lanka and Latin America. Details of how social capital can be used to improve service delivery are outlined in the contributions from Michael Woolcock of the World Bank and David Halpern from the Strategy Unit.
  • Covid-19: Joint Statement to the Chancellor of the Exchequer

    Covid-19: Joint Statement to the Chancellor of the Exchequer

    COVID-19: JOINT STATEMENT TO THE CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER Rt Hon RISHI SUNAK We write on behalf of Birmingham’s business community, including the Greater Birmingham Chambers of Commerce, Birmingham City Council, the Greater Birmingham & Solihull Local Enterprise Partnership, the Institute of Directors West Midlands, the Federation of Small Businesses, MPs, Lords, Trade Unions and Business Improvement Districts following the announcement yesterday that the City was to be subject to further enhanced restrictions. Birmingham now falls into the “High Level” category of restrictions (Tier 2) which amongst other things will prevent the mixing of households in social settings. This alone will have a devastating impact on an already fragile hospitality sector. We acknowledge and appreciate that Government is making incredibly difficult decisions in unprecedented times. But these are also difficult and unprecedented times for our employees, constituents and members, many of whom have had to live with the uncertainty that Covid-19 has brought over the spring and summer months which now seems likely to extend for the duration of the winter. Prior to Covid-19 Birmingham was booming with an economy second only to London in size at £31.9bn. Our tourism and hospitality sectors were worth £13bn employing close to 76,000 people. The Council and Greater Birmingham Chambers of Commerce wrote to you last week setting out the steps that the Government needed to take to help limit the impact of coronavirus on the City. These included:- (a) Taking an evidence-informed approach to the implementation of restrictions, so if a threshold is met (such as the rate of infection per 100,000) work is undertaken to fully understand the sources of infection in a geographic area to enable the tailoring of restrictions accordingly.
  • Multinational Corporate Networks and the Diffusion of Skill-Selective Immigration Policies Vivienne Born University of Pennsylvania, Vivienne.Born@Gmail.Com

    Multinational Corporate Networks and the Diffusion of Skill-Selective Immigration Policies Vivienne Born University of Pennsylvania, [email protected]

    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2019 Getting The Best Of Us: Multinational Corporate Networks And The Diffusion Of Skill-Selective Immigration Policies Vivienne Born University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the International Relations Commons, and the Organizational Behavior and Theory Commons Recommended Citation Born, Vivienne, "Getting The Best Of Us: Multinational Corporate Networks And The Diffusion Of Skill-Selective Immigration Policies" (2019). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 3359. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/3359 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/3359 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Getting The Best Of Us: Multinational Corporate Networks And The Diffusion Of Skill-Selective Immigration Policies Abstract Populist backlash has emerged as an alarming trend shaping immigration policy across the developed world in recent years. At the same time, a less-sensationalized pattern has appeared in the form of policies designed to attract the highly skilled. In the face of so much anti-immigration sentiment, how can we understand this push for global talent? One possibility is that these seemingly divergent agenda are but two sides of the same coin. Policymakers and members of the business community point to labor shortages and a global war for talent as justifications for skill-selective policies. Yet some in the academic community contest that the evidence for these concerns is lacking. This gives rise to a two-pronged question. Is there really a competition between states? And how can we understand the role of corporations in advancing the international mobility of the highly skilled? This dissertation offers a theory of the multinational corporation (MNC) as the instrument of international policy diffusion.