The Ukrainian Weekly 2003, No.43

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Ukrainian Weekly 2003, No.43 www.ukrweekly.com INSIDE:• Instructions for new Diversity Visa Lottery — page 3. • Ukrainian American Veterans hold 56th national convention — page 4. • Adrian Karatnycky speaks on Ukraine’s domestic and foreign affairs — page 9. Published by the Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal non-profit association Vol. LXXI HE No.KRAINIAN 43 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, OCTOBER 26, 2003 EEKLY$1/$2 in Ukraine HistorianT says UPulitzer awarded Russian-UkrainianW dispute over Tuzla escalates by Roman Woronowycz Yanukovych called for calm and the use of to Duranty should be revoked Kyiv Press Bureau diplomacy to defuse the situation. “We cannot allow this to turn into armed by Andrew Nynka 1932 be revoked, The New York Times KYIV – A diplomatic tussle that began reported. The letter asked the newspaper conflict,” warned Mr. Yanukovych on PARSIPPANY, N.J. – A noted with the construction of a dike by Russia to for its comments on Mr. Duranty’s work. October 21. “We must resolve this at the Columbia University professor of history link the Russian Taman Peninsula with the As part of its review of Mr. Duranty’s negotiating table.” has said in a report – commissioned by Ukrainian island of Tuzla in the Kerch work, The New York Times commis- On October 22 the prime minister’s The New York Times and subsequently Strait escalated to full-blown crisis begin- sioned Dr. von Hagen, an expert on early office announced that Mr. Yanukovych had sent to the Pulitzer Prize Board – that the ning on October 20 when Moscow question canceled a trip to Estonia and would fly 20th century Soviet history, to examine Ukraine’s sovereignty over the tiny island 1931 dispatches of Pulitzer Prize winner nearly all of what Mr. Duranty wrote for instead to Moscow on October 24 to meet Walter Duranty showed “a serious lack of and demanded proof of the country’s right with his Russian counterpart, Mikhail The New York Times in 1931. to it. balance.” “After reading through a good portion Kasyanov, to address the Tuzla issue. The Twenty-six days after Russian construc- agreement to meet came only after Mr. Prof. Mark von Hagen said in an inter- of Duranty’s reporting for 1931, I was tion vehicles began an unannounced con- Yanukovych made a personal phone call to view with The Ukrainian Weekly on disappointed and disturbed by the overall struction project to build a dike into the Mr. Kasyanov’s office. Earlier in the day October 23 that Mr. Duranty’s reporting picture he painted of the Soviet Union for Kerch Strait in the direction of Tuzla Island, Russian officials said the Tuzla matter from the Soviet Union could be charac- that period,” Dr. von Hagen wrote. “But terized as “cynical in tone and apologist a five-mile strip of land sparsely populated would be discussed only at a previously after reading so much of Duranty in 1931 mostly with pensioners and vacationers, the scheduled meeting of foreign ministers set in purpose and effect in terms of justify- it is far less surprising to me that he ing what the Stalinist regime was up to.” area had become the central focus of an for October 30. would deny in print the famine of 1932- international dispute bordering on armed Russian President Vladimir Putin, who “That lack of balance and uncritical 1933.” acceptance of the Soviet self-justification conflict. until that point had remained uncharacteris- Asked if his opinion of Mr. Duranty’s The same day that Moscow announced for its cruel and wasteful regime was a tically quiet as the crisis evolved, ordered reporting would change if he were to via diplomatic note that it questioned disservice to the American readers of The Krasnodar Krai officials to halt construction examine only those 13 articles for which Ukraine’s sovereignty over Tuzla, Kyiv New York Times and the liberal values of the dike on October 22. The Ukrainian Mr. Duranty won the Pulitzer Prize, Dr. supplanted a border guard detachment that they subscribe to and to the historical press reported that construction was sus- von Hagen replied with a resolute no. had been carrying out border defense exer- experience of the peoples of the Russian pended for an hour near midnight, but The reporting for which he won the cises since October 10 with 14 gunboats and Soviet empires and their struggle for resumed early in the morning of October Pulitzer Prize was “quintessential of the and aircraft to patrol the area around the a better life,” Dr. von Hagen wrote in his 23. Ukrainian government television stated problems of Mr. Duranty’s analysis,” Dr. Ukrainian-Russian border, which is found on October 23 that Presidents Putin and 4,138-word report. von Hagen said. The professor said that 150 meters southeast of the shore of Tuzla. The New York Times commissioned Kuchma had held their first telephone con- Mr. Duranty’s award “diminishes the Two days later, with construction mov- versation on the matter that day, but did not Dr. von Hagen to write an independent prize’s value.” ing to within 200 meters of Tuzla Island, assessment of Mr. Duranty’s reporting on give details. “It should never have been awarded in Ukraine’s President Leonid Kuchma cur- Later on October 23 Ukraine’s the Soviet Union after the newspaper the first place,” Dr. von Hagen said. “I tailed a state visit to Latin America to return Verkhovna Rada, in an uncharacteristic received a letter from the Pulitzer Prize started reading [Mr. Duranty’s work from to Kyiv to keep rein over an increasingly show of unity, passed a resolution con- Board in July. 1931] and kept saying: this is apology, vitriolic dialogue between the diplomats of demning the Russian actions as “an In the letter, the board said it was clearly apology.” the two states. Upon arrival, Mr. Kuchma unfriendly act that will force Ukraine to responding to “a new round of demands” immediately flew to the island to meet with revise its current relations with the Russian (Continued on page 18) that the prize awarded to Mr. Duranty in Ukrainian officials monitoring the construc- Federation,” with 369 of the 450 members tion of the dike, which the Ukrainian and of the parliament supporting the declaration. Russian press refer to as a dam. The island, ownership of which until House of Representatives adopts As the Ukrainian president returned from now had never been in dispute, lies in a Brazil, Ukrainian border troops moved pon- body of water that Kyiv and Moscow have resolution on Famine of 1932-1933 toon boats into place to block any attempt to found difficulty in delimiting. Russia would extend the dike into Ukrainian territory. like to leave both the Kerch Strait and the Meanwhile Ukraine’s Armed Forces con- Sea of Azov undelimited and in common WASHINGTON – The U.S. House of famine in order to suppress criticism of ducted unexpected military training exercis- ownership, while Ukraine is seeking a more Representatives on October 20 adopted the Soviet regime”; es at Chauda, located 70 kilometers (50 traditional border delimitation and demarca- House Resolution 356 “Expressing the • “Western observers and scholars who miles) south of Tuzla at the southern tip of tion. sense of the House of Representatives reported accurately on the existence of the Kerch Peninsula. The one-day training, Russia has defended the building of the regarding the man-made famine that the famine were subjected to disparage- which Ukrainian military officials said was dike as a necessary decision made by offi- occurred in Ukraine in 1932-1933” by a ment and criticism in the West for their planned in advance, included live-fire exer- cials of the Krasnodar Krai, who insist the vote of 382-0. reporting of the famine”; cises and the use of MiG 29 and SU-27 jet dike would control ecological damage to The resolution was introduced by • “the Soviet regime and many schol- aircraft. the coast of the Taman Peninsula. Henry Hyde (R-Ill.), chairman of the ars in the West continued to deny the With authorities on both sides of the con- Ukraine said it believes the real point House International Relations existence of the famine until the collapse frontation increasingly warning that the sit- behind the construction is to reconnect the Committee, with Christopher Smith (R- of the Soviet regime in 1991 resulted in uation could escalate out of control, island with Russian territory to change the N.J.), chairman of the Helsinki many of its archives being made accessi- Ukraine’s Prime Minister Viktor territorial configuration of the Kerch Strait Commission, and Tom Lantos (D-Calif.), ble, thereby making possible the docu- and give Moscow a hedge in ranking member of the House mentation of the premeditated nature of border delimitation talks. International Relations Committee, as the famine and its harsh enforcement”; Although nearly every original co-sponsors. • “the final report of the United States Russian politician and diplo- The resolution makes the following government’s Commission on the mat has stated that Russia points: Ukraine Famine, established on has no intention of connect- • “many Western observers with first- December 13, 1985, concluded that the ing to the Ukrainian island, victims were ‘starved to death in a man- hand knowledge of the famine, including no one has explained where made famine’ and that ‘Joseph Stalin and construction will end. The New York Times correspondent those around him committed genocide The crisis began when Walter Duranty, who was awarded a against Ukrainians in 1932-1933’ ”; Russia began construction Pulitzer Prize in 1932 for his reporting • although the Ukraine famine was one of the dike from its Taman from the Soviet Union, knowingly and of the greatest losses of human life in the The tiny island of Tuzla, located in the Kerch Strait, Peninsula in the direction of deliberately falsified their reports to is highlighted in the rectangle below Kerch.
Recommended publications
  • The Role of Bohdan Khmelnytskyi and the Kozaks in the Rusin Struggle for Independence from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth: 1648--1649
    University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor Electronic Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Major Papers 1-1-1967 The role of Bohdan Khmelnytskyi and the Kozaks in the Rusin struggle for independence from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth: 1648--1649. Andrew B. Pernal University of Windsor Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd Recommended Citation Pernal, Andrew B., "The role of Bohdan Khmelnytskyi and the Kozaks in the Rusin struggle for independence from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth: 1648--1649." (1967). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 6490. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/6490 This online database contains the full-text of PhD dissertations and Masters’ theses of University of Windsor students from 1954 forward. These documents are made available for personal study and research purposes only, in accordance with the Canadian Copyright Act and the Creative Commons license—CC BY-NC-ND (Attribution, Non-Commercial, No Derivative Works). Under this license, works must always be attributed to the copyright holder (original author), cannot be used for any commercial purposes, and may not be altered. Any other use would require the permission of the copyright holder. Students may inquire about withdrawing their dissertation and/or thesis from this database. For additional inquiries, please contact the repository administrator via email ([email protected]) or by telephone at 519-253-3000ext. 3208. THE ROLE OF BOHDAN KHMELNYTSKYI AND OF THE KOZAKS IN THE RUSIN STRUGGLE FOR INDEPENDENCE FROM THE POLISH-LI'THUANIAN COMMONWEALTH: 1648-1649 by A ‘n d r e w B. Pernal, B. A. A Thesis Submitted to the Department of History of the University of Windsor in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Faculty of Graduate Studies 1967 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • From Region to Region 15-Day Tour to the Most Intriguing Places of Ancient
    Ukraine: from region to region 15-day tour to the most intriguing places of ancient Ukraine All year round Explore the most interesting sights all over Ukraine and learn about the great history of the country. Be dazzled by glittering church domes, wide boulevards and glamorous nightlife in Kyiv, the capital city; learn about the Slavonic culture in Chernihiv and dwell on the Cossacks epoch at the other famous towns; admire the palace and park complexes, imagining living in the previous centuries; disclose the secrets of Ukrainian unique handicrafts and visit the magnificent monasteries. Don’t miss a chance to drink some coffee in the well-known and certainly stunning Western city Lviv and take an opportunity to see the beautiful Carpathian Mountains, go hiking on their highest peak or just go for a stroll in the truly fresh air. Get unforgettable memories from Kamyanets-Podilsky with its marvelous stone fortress and take pictures of the so called “movie-star fortress” at Khotyn. Day 1, Kyiv Meeting at the airport in Kyiv. Transfer to a hotel. Accommodation at the hotel. Welcome dinner. Meeting with a guide and a short presentation of a tour. Day 2, Kyiv Breakfast. A 3-hour bus tour around the historical districts of Kyiv: Golden Gate (the unique monument which reflects the art of fortification of Kievan Rus), a majestic St. Sophia’s Cathedral, St. Volodymyr’s and St. Michael’s Golden Domed Cathedrals, an exuberant St. Andrew’s Church. A walk along Andriyivsky Uzviz (Andrew’s Descent) – Kyiv’s “Monmartre” - where the peculiar Ukrainian souvenirs may be bought.
    [Show full text]
  • This Content Downloaded from 132.174.254.159 on Tue, 08 Dec
    This content downloaded from 132.174.254.159 on Tue, 08 Dec 2015 11:09:27 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions LETTERS FROM HEAVEN: POPULAR RELIGION IN RUSSIA AND UKRAINE This content downloaded from 132.174.254.159 on Tue, 08 Dec 2015 11:09:27 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions This page intentionally left blank This content downloaded from 132.174.254.159 on Tue, 08 Dec 2015 11:09:27 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Edited by JOHN­PAUL HIMKA and ANDRIY ZAYARNYUK Letters from Heaven Popular Religion in Russia and Ukraine UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO PRESS Toronto Buffalo London This content downloaded from 132.174.254.159 on Tue, 08 Dec 2015 11:09:27 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions www.utppublishing.com © University of Toronto Press Incorporated 2006 Toronto Buffalo London Printed in Canada ISBN­13: 978­0­8020­9148­2 ISBN­10: 0­8020­9148­2 Printed on acid­free paper Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Letters from heaven : popular religion in Russia and Ukraine / edited by John•Paul Himka and Andriy Zayarnyuk. ISBN­13: 978­0­8020­9148­2 ISBN­10: 0­8020­9148­2 1. Russia – Religion – History. 2. Ukraine – Religion – History. 3. Religion and culture – Russia (Federation) – History. 4. Religion and culture – Ukraine – History. 5. Eastern Orthodox Church – Russia (Federation) – History. 6. Eastern Orthodox Church – Ukraine – History. I. Himka, John•Paul, 1949– II. Zayarnyuk, Andriy, 1975– BX485.L48 2006 281.9 947 C2006­903711­6 University of Toronto Press acknowledges the financial assistance to its publishing program of the Canada Council for the Arts and the Ontario Arts Council.
    [Show full text]
  • 8. Ukraine's Long and Winding Road to the European Charter for Regional Or Minority Languages
    8. Ukraine's long and winding road to the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages Bill Bowring and Myroslava Antonovych 1. Introduction This paper tackles the paradoxical role played by the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages (ECRML) both in the formulation of government policy, and in the turbulent politics of Ukraine, and the vexed question of the status of the Russian language in the country. The authors contend that the charter has achieved great symbolic signifi- cance in Ukraine. However, the actual content of its ratification remains the subject of confusion. That is, ratification and implementation of the charter have become strictly political rather than policy objectives, not only leading to surprising reversals in the ratification process (Ukraine has ratified it not once but twice), but also to implementation in forms not anticipated in the charter itself. It is ironical that the ECRML was designed: ... [to allay] the fears of governments, who would have reacted negatively to anything seen as posing a threat to national unity of the territorial integrity of the state, but which were more open to accepting the existence of cultural and linguistic diversity on their territories.1 In Ukraine the ECRML has played a very different role. This "symbolic capital" of the charter is explored in the following account and analysis of its history in Ukraine from 1996 to the present. The paper is organised as follows. The authors start with the unintended consequences of Ukraine's ratification of the ECRML and next proceed to an exploration of the interplay of the linguistic and political history of Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Article
    Numerical Simulation of Propagation of the Black Sea and the Azov Sea Tsunami Through the Kerch Strait L. I. Lobkovsky1, R. Kh. Mazova2,*, E. A. Baranova2, A. M. Tugaryov2 1Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation 2Nizhny Novgorod State Technical University n. a. R. E. Alekseev, Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation *e-mail: [email protected] The present paper deals with the potential strong tsunamigenic earthquakes with the sources localized in the Black and Azov seas at the entrance and exit of the Kerch Strait, respectively. Since, at present time, the tsunami hazards are usually assessed for the critical earthquake magnitude values, potential strong earthquakes with a magnitude M = 7 are studied. The seismic sources of elliptical form are considered. When choosing the source location in the northeast of the Black Sea, the most seismically dangerous areas of the basin under consideration are allowed for. Numerical simulation is carried out within the framework of the nonlinear shallow water equations with the dissipative effects taken into account. Two possible scenarios of tsunami propagation at the chosen source locations are analyzed. The wave characteristics are obtained for a tsunami wave motion both from the Black Sea through the Kerch Strait to the Azov Sea. The symmetrical problem for a tsunami wave propagation from the Azov Sea through the Kerch Strait to the Black Sea is also considered. Spectral analysis of the tsunami wave field is carried out for the studied basin. The wave and energy characteristics of the tsunami waves in the area of the bridge across the Kerch Strait are subjected to the detailed examination and assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Borders in Flux: Ukraine As a Case Study of Russia's Approach to Its
    Borders in Flux: Ukraine as a Case Study of Russia’s Approach to its Borders Marek Menkiszak Abstract This paper examines the contemporary border between Ukraine and Russia as a case study of Russia’s approach to its borders. Two research questions are addressed: Firstly, what does the annexation of Crimea by Russia as well as its attempts to further undermine Ukraine’s territorial integrity in its eastern region of Donbas say about Russia’s peculiar approach to Ukraine and its borders? Secondly Whether and To what extent does Russia’s approach represent a broader pattern of Russia’s policy towards its borders? This paper is divided into three parts: the first part gives a brief account of the modern history of the Russian-Ukrainian border; the second part focuses on peculiar Russian approaches to Ukraine revealed during the current Russian-Ukrainian crisis; the third part puts “the Ukrainian case” into broader conceptual frameworks. This paper concludes that Russia’s recognition of the territorial integrity and the borders of the post-Soviet states is conditional and depends mainly on their participation in Russia-led integration projects. Introduction On March 18, 2014, Russian President Vladimir Putin and the new pro-Moscow leaders of Crimea signed an agreement between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Crimea (an autonomous region of Ukraine, which illegally declared its independence on February 27 and was acknowledged on March 17, when the so called Republic of Crimea was formally created) on the accession of the latter to
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine and Russia People, Politics, Propaganda and Perspectives 
    EDITED BY i AGNIESZKA PIKULICKA-WILCZEWSKA & RICHARD SAKWA Ukraine and Russia People, Politics, Propaganda and Perspectives This e-book is provided without charge via free download by E-International Relations (www.E-IR.info). It is not permitted to be sold in electronic format under any circumstances. If you enjoy our free e-books, please consider leaving a small donation to allow us to continue investing in open access publications: http://www.e-ir.info/about/donate/ i Ukraine and Russia People, Politics, Propaganda and Perspectives EDITED BY AGNIESZKA PIKULICKA-WILCZEWSKA & RICHARD SAKWA ii E-International Relations www.E-IR.info Bristol, England First published 2015 New version 2016 ISBN 978-1-910814-14-7 (Paperback) ISBN 978-1-910814-00-0 (e-book) This book is published under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC 4.0 license. You are free to: • Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material Under the following terms: • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. • NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission. Please contact [email protected] for any such enquiries. Other than the license terms noted above, there are no restrictions placed on the use and dissemination of this book for student learning materials / scholarly use.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Transatlantic 01/C
    CHANGING TRANSATLANTIC SECURITY RELATIONS This book uses the concept of a strategic triangle as an organizing principle for the study of the security relationship between the United States, the EU and Russia and provides a fresh look at the development of transatlantic security relations after September 11. To understand these relations the contributors have explored each of the three actors in the triangle. The volume first analyses the actor capability of the EU in the transatlantic context and explains how the Union can maintain such a capability, despite the controversy surrounding the proposed EU Constitution. Secondly, as Russia is now able to play a role in this strategic relationship, this book demonstrates how Russia needs to develop its democratic system and mod- ernise its economy more if it is to become fully integrated into the new strategic triangle. Finally, this volume provides a qualified assessment of the role of the new strategic triangle in the broader scheme of US grand strategy and strives to answer the question: under what US grand strategy, if any, might the strategic triangle be an important way of characterizing the security relationship among the United States, Russia and the EU? This book will be of interest to students and researchers in security and strategic studies and international relations. Jan Hallenberg is professor of political science at the Swedish National Defence College. He specializes in US foreign policy and transatlantic security relations. Håkan Karlsson is a specialist on US strategy and nuclear weapons. His publications include Bureaucratic Politics and Weapons Acquisition: The Case of the MX ICBM Program (two volumes, 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Oil Spill in the Kerch Strait Ukraine Post-Disaster Needs Assessment
    Oil Spill in the Kerch Strait Ukraine Post-Disaster Needs Assessment European Commission United Nations Environment Programme UA-460 Oil Spill in the Kerch Strait Ukraine Post-Disaster Needs Assessment European Commission United Nations Environment Programme UA-460 Introduction operations on Tuzla Island – situated north of the shipwreck in the middle of the Strait and one of On 11 November 2007, a strong storm in the Kerch the main affected areas. Seventeen technical Strait (which connects the Sea of Azov with the units were engaged in clean-up efforts and fifteen Black Sea and separates Ukraine from the Russian ships performed oil spill contingency operations Federation) blew winds of up to 35 m/s and waves of in the Kerch Strait. The European Commission (EC) up to five meters. The storm resulted in thirteen vessels immediately offered assistance for “preparing the being sunk, stranded, or damaged and the incident environmental assessment as to the magnitude of the caused loss of life, of property, and environmental catastrophe as well as allocation of technical and harm. The four vessels that sank were: motor tanker financial resources to remediate its impact.” Volgoneft-139 (Russian Flag), motor vessel Volnogorsk, motor vessel Nahichevan (Russian Flag), and motor On 16 November 2007, the Government of Ukraine vessel Kovel (Russian Flag).1 Russian motor vessel accepted the EC’s offer of assistance. From 18-24 Volgoneft-139 initially leaked approximately 1,300 November 2007, the EC Monitoring and Information tonnes of fuel oil into the sea. Treacherous weather Centre (MIC)2 deployed a mission. A team of five conditions at sea (18-20 m/s wind, 2.5 m waves), experts was deployed [to Ukraine] immediately; hampered any clean-up efforts in the sea during the this team included a representative from the Joint initial 24 hours, resulting in oil being transported to the UNEP/OCHA Environment Unit to “assist the Ukrainian shorelines on both sides of the Kerch Strait.
    [Show full text]
  • About Some Environmental Consequences of Kerch Strait Bridge Construction
    Hydrology 2018; 6(1): 1-9 http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/hyd doi: 10.11648/j.hyd.20180601.11 ISSN: 2330-7609 (Print); ISSN: 2330-7617 (Online) About Some Environmental Consequences of Kerch Strait Bridge Construction Romashchenko Mykhailo Ivanovych, Yatsiuk Mykhailo Vasylovych, Shevchuk Sergiy Аnatoliyovych, Vyshnevskyi Viktor Ivanovych, Savchuk Dmytro Petrovych Institute of Water Problems and Land Reclamation NAAS, Kyiv, Ukraine Email address: [email protected] (M. I. Romashchenko), [email protected] (M. V. Yatsiuk), [email protected] (S. A. Shevchuk) To cite this article: Romashchenko Mykhailo Ivanovych, Yatsiuk Mykhailo Vasylovych, Shevchuk Sergiy Аnatoliyovych, Vyshnevskyi Viktor Ivanovych, Savchuk Dmytro Petrovych. About Some Environmental Consequences of Kerch Strait Bridge Construction. Hydrology. Vol. 6, No. 1, 2018, pp. 1-9. doi: 10.11648/j.hyd.20180601.11 Received: November 29, 2017; Accepted: December 18, 2017; Published: January 16, 2018 Abstract: After the annexation of the Crimean peninsula by the Russian Federation, the construction of the Kerch bridge crossing, which has not been coordinated with Ukraine, has been started, which in the near future may lead to the destruction of the unique flora and fauna of the Black and Azov Seas. The results of the Kerch Strait Bridge construction consequences for the environment are presented. The main sources of data were the materials of remote sensing (RS), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), European Space Agency (ESA), US Geological Survey (USGS), literary sources, as well as the results of Tuzla Island survey carried out before the beginning of construction. The data regarding ecologic and hydrologic situation caused by the Kerch Strait Bridge construction were processed for the period between 2014 and 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Pavlo Zaitsev
    PAVLO ZAITSEV Translated and edited by GEORGE S.N. LUCKYJ Taras Shevchenko A LI FE PAVLO ZAITSEV Translated and edited by George S.N. Luckyj Taras Shevchenko is undoubtedly Ukraine's greatest literary genius and national hero. His extraordinary life-story is recounted in this classic work by Pavlo Zaitsev. Born in 1814, the son of a poor serf, Shevchenko succeeded in winning his freedom and became an art student in St Petersburg. In 1847 he was arrested for writing revolutionary poetry, forced into the army, and exiled to deserted outposts of the Russian empire to undergo an incredible odys­ sey of misery for ten years. Zaitsev's re­ counting of Shevchenko's ordeal is a moving portrait of a man able not only to survive extreme suffering but to transform it into poetry that articulated the aspirations of his enslaved nation. To this day Ukrainians observe a national day of mourning each year on the anniversary of Shevchenko's death. Zaitsev's biography has long been recog­ nized by scholars as defmitive. Originally written and typeset in the 1930s, the manuscript was confiscated fro m Zaitsev by Soviet authori- ties when they annexed Galicia in 1939. The author still had proofs, however, which he revised and published in Munich in 1955. George luckyj's translation, the first in English, now offers this indispensable biography to a new audience. CEORCE S . N. LUCKYJ is Professor Emeritus of Slavic Studies, University of Toronto. He is the author of Literary Politics in tire Soviet Ukraine and Between Gogol and Shevclre11ko, and editor of Shm:henko and the Critics.
    [Show full text]
  • Dominant Narratives in Russian Political and Media Discourse During the Ukraine Crisis
    The University of Manchester Research Dominant Narratives in Russian Political and Media Discourse during the Ukraine Crisis Link to publication record in Manchester Research Explorer Citation for published version (APA): Hutchings, S., & Szostek, J. (2015). Dominant Narratives in Russian Political and Media Discourse during the Ukraine Crisis. In A. Pikulicka-Wilcewska, & R. Sakwa (Eds.), Ukraine and Russia: People, Politics, Propaganda and Perspectives E-International Relations Publishing. http://www.e-ir.info/2015/04/28/dominant-narratives-in- russian-political-and-media-discourse-during-the-crisis/ Published in: Ukraine and Russia Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on Manchester Research Explorer is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Proof version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Explorer are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Takedown policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please refer to the University of Manchester’s Takedown Procedures [http://man.ac.uk/04Y6Bo] or contact [email protected] providing relevant details, so we can investigate your claim. Download date:04. Oct. 2021 EDITED COLLECTION E-IR.INFO Ukraine and Russia: People, Politics, Propaganda and Perspectives Ukraine and Russia: People, Politics, Propaganda and Perspectives i Ukraine and Russia: People, Politics, Propaganda and Perspectives EDITED BY AGNIESZKA PIKULICKA-WILCZEWSKA & RICHARD SAKwa Ukraine and Russia: People, Politics, Propaganda and Perspectives ii E-International Relations www.E-IR.info Bristol, UK 2015 The material herein is published under a Creative Commons License CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.
    [Show full text]