Metamorphic Mineral Assemblages of Slightly Calcic Pelitic Rocks in And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Metamorphic Mineral Assemblages of Slightly Calcic Pelitic Rocks in And Metamorphic Mineral Assemblages of Slightly Calcic Pelitic Rocks in and around tlie Taconic Allochthon, Southwestern Massachusetts arid Adjacent*» Connecticut and New York GEOLOGICAL StJRVEY PROFESSIONAL PAFER 111 Metamorphic Mineral Assemblages of Slightly Calcic Pelitic Rocks in and around the Taconic Allochthon, Southwestern Massachusetts and Adjacent Connecticut and New York By E-AN ZEN GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 111 A study of progressive regional metamorphism of pelitic schists from the Taconic allochthon of southwestern Massachusetts and its bearing on the geologic history of the area IMTED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1981 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Doyle G. Frederick, Acting Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Zen, E-an, 1928- Metamorphic mineral assemblages of slightly calcic pelitic rocks in and around the Taconic allochthon, south­ western Massachusetts and adjacent Connecticut and New York. (Geological Survey professional paper ; 1113) Bibliography: p. 1. Rocks, Metamorphic. 2. Petrology Taconic Mountains. I. Title. II. Series: United States. Geological Sur­ vey. Professional paper ; 1113. QE475.Z46 552'.4 78-32050 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract ______________ 1 Mineralogy and mineral assemblages—Continued Introduction _______________________ 2 Model mineral compositions—Continued Acknowledgments __________________ 4 Chloritoid _______———_______________ 22 Summary of regional geology _______ 4 Garnet _______—_—__________________ 22 Stratigraphy __________________ 4 Chlorite _______________——_——— 23 Structure ___________•.. 5 Biotite ________________————_ 23 Mineralogy and mineral assemblages 6 Muscovite _____-__—_—————— 23 Muscovite _____________________ 7 Epidote ___________—_____________ 23 Paragonite __________________ 9 Hornblende _________—_-—————— 23 Biotite _______________________ 9 Plagioclase ___________—___________ 23 Chlorite ______________________ 10 Kyanite _____________________________ 23 Chloritoid _____________________ 11 A model multisystem ________________________ 23 Staurolite _______________ 12 Problematic phase relations ___________________ 26 Garnet _______________________ 13 First appearance of chloritoid _————_———___ 26 Kyanite ______________________ 15 The chemography of garnet and the biotite-chlori- Amphiboles ___________________ 15 toid-garnet-chlorite relations _________________ 27 Tremolite _________________ 15 Chloritoid-staurolite relations _———————__ 30 Cummingtonite _______ 15 Kyanite-bearing assemblage _———____________ 33 Hornblende __________ 15 Phase relations involving epidote _ — ___ —— — ___ 34 Epidote ______________________ 16 Relation between epidote-bearing and hornblende- Plagioclase ___________________ 17 bearing assemblages _______————________ 36 Ilmenite _____________ 21 Cummingtonite-bearing assemblages ____________ 37 Magnetite _____________________ 21 Conditions of metamorphism _____ —— — _———_ —— _ 38 Tourmaline ___________________ 21 A retrograde isograd? _——_————_—————___ 42 Quartz _________________ 21 Geologic implications of overburden pressure during Model mineral compositions _____ 22 metamorphism _________——__——_————__ 42 Staurolite _________________ 22 References cited _____——_———_—————————— 42 ILLUSTRATIONS Page FIGURE 1. Generalized geologic map of the study area ____________________—_—_—______ 2 2,3. Triangular diagrams of: 2. Ar'-Al lv-(Fetotai+Mer) compositions of muscovite analyzed by use of the microprobe ____ 8 3. Atomic A(Al-alkalis)FM for biotite samples analyzed by use of the microprobe _-______ 10 4. Photomicrograph of sample 376—1, showing ilmenite sandwiched between chlorite plates _____—__ 11 5. Graphs showing composition profiles across garnet crystals in samples 356-1 and 487-2-4 __________ 14 6. Photomicrographs of cummingtonite assemblages for samples 170-1 and 487-2 ___________ 16 7. Graphs showing composition profiles across a hornblende crystal in sample 102-1 _____—______ 17 8,9. Photomicrographs of: 8. Coexisting Staurolite and epidote in samples 356-1 and 590-1 _______________—_ 17 9. Triply zoned plagioclase from samples 3-3 and 360-1 _________________——_—— 18 10. Graphs showing composition profiles across zoned plagioclase of samples 3-3, 360-1, and 14-1 ______ 19 11. Photomicrographs showing extreme habit adaptation of metamorphic plagioclase to the foliation sur­ face of the rock, sample 423-1, and late plagioclase that includes folded foliation defined by dust trains, sample 340-1 _____________________________________________________________ 20 12. Graph showing manganese content of coexisting garnet and ilmenite (as inclusions in garnet) in sample 356-1 _____________________________________________ 21 13. Photomicrographs of zoned tourmaline, sample 509-1, and of a mantle of tourmaline, sample 102-2_ 22 III IV CONTENTS Page FIGURES 14,15. Diagrams showing: 14. A closed net for the quinary multisystem AWFeO-MgO-CaO-K^O, for the phases epidote- garnet-plagioclase-chlorite-chloritoid-staurolite-biotite-muscovite in the presence of quartz and having H20 and 02 as boundary-value components ———————————————————— 24 15. A part of the multisystematk net of figure 14 containing the four invariant points (St), (Ep), (Bt),and (Cd) _____________________—————————————————————— 26 16. Photomicrographs of chloritoid-biotite assemblages _———————————————————————————— 28 17. ACFM diagram wherein paragonite is projected to the A apex, for phases in coexistence with epidote 35 18. Graph showing experimental pressure-temperature curves pertinent to the mineral assemblages of the study area _____________________——————-—————————————————————— 39 19. Photomicrograph of sample 191-1, showing chlorite rimming magnetite ————————————————— 42 TABLES [Tables follow References Cited] Page TABLE 1. Mineral assemblages in samples of rocks from within and around the Taconic allochthon, south­ western Massachusetts and adjacent parts of Connecticut and New York —————————————— 49 2. Localities from which samples were obtained for mineral-assemblage information ———————————— 54 3. Microprobe data on various minerals in samples of rocks from within and around the Taconic allochthon: A. Muscovite ___________________—________—_—————————————————— 57 B. Biotite ______________________________________________———————— 67 C. Chlorite __________________________________________—_——_————— 75 D. Chloritoid ______________________________________________—_————— 81 E. Staurolite ____________________________________________-_—__ 88 F. Garnet ________________________ __________________——————— 95 G. Kyanite ____________________________________________-__-__ 106 H. Hornblende and cummingtonite ______ — ————————————————————————————— 107 /. Epidote ______________________________-_________________________ 109 J. Plagioclase _________________——————_—_———_—_———————————— 110 K. Ilmenite ____________________________________________________ 117 L. Magnetite ____________________________________________________ 123 4. Conventional wet-chemical analyses and the number of atoms calculated on the basis of the anhydrous formulas for selected minerals ___________——________________—_________ 124 5. Comparison of wet-chemical and microprobe analyses and of the calculated chemical formulas of staurolite from sample 355-1 ____________________________________—__ 126 6. Molar volumes of minerals used to calculate slopes of the univariant curves shown in figure 15 ___ 126 7. Compositions of coexisting chlorite, biotite, chloritoid, and garnet in the presence of muscovite, plagioclase, and quartz ____________________________________________ 127 8. Partial mineral-assemblage data for samples of epidote-bearing assemblages ______________ 127 9. Compositions of coexisting minerals in three hornblende assemblages ___________________ 128 10. Estimates of minimum temperature of metamorphism based on the K/(K+Na) ratios of muscovite compositions and the 2.07-kbar solvus of Eugster and others (1972) and micrroprobe data ——— 128 METAMORPHIC MINERAL ASSEMBLAGES OF SLIGHTLY CALCIC PELITIC ROCKS IN AND AROUND THE TACONIC ALLOCHTHON, SOUTHWESTERN MASSACHUSETTS AND ADJACENT CONNECTICUT AND NEW YORK By E-AN ZEN ABSTRACT stable existence of this phase. Inasmuch as the first ap­ The mineral assemblages from metamorphosed slightly pearance of staurolite is always in chlorite-bearing as­ calcic pelitic rocks of the Taconic Range in southwestern semblages, I suggest that the mapped staurolite zone Massachusetts and adjacent areas of Connecticut and New marker corresponds to a reaction whereby staurolite- York were studied petrographically and chemically. These chlorite becomes stable. The probable lower grade chemi­ rocks vary in metamorphic grade from those below the cal equivalent, for example, chloritoid-aluminum sili­ chloritoid zone through the chloritoid and garnet zones into cate, however, has not been found in the area of study. the kyanite-staurolite zone. Microprobe data on the ferro- Several staurolite-forming reactions discussed in the magnesian minerals show that the sequence of increasing literature are ruled out because of the relative sidero- Fe/ (Fe+Mg) value is, from the lowest, chlorite, biotite, horn­ phility of the minerals. A second staurolite isograd blende, chloritoid, staurolite, garnet. Hornblende, epidote, involves the reaction, chloritoid+chlorite+muscovite= garnet, and plagioclase are the
Recommended publications
  • Geology and Mineral Deposits of the James River-Roanoke River Manganese District Virginia
    Geology and Mineral Deposits of the James River-Roanoke River Manganese District Virginia GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1008 Geology and Mineral ·Deposits oftheJatnes River-Roanoke River Manganese District Virginia By GILBERT H. ESPENSHADE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1008 A description of the geology anq mineral deposits, particularly manganese, of the James River-Roanoke River district UNITED STAT.ES GOVERNMENT, PRINTING. OFFICE• WASHINGTON : 1954 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Douglas McKay, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. CONTENTS· Page Abstract---------------------------------------------------------- 1 Introduction______________________________________________________ 4 Location, accessibility, and culture_______________________________ 4 Topography, climate, and vegetation _______________ .,.. _______ ---___ 6 Field work and acknowledgments________________________________ 6 Previouswork_________________________________________________ 8 GeneralgeologY--------------------------------------------------- 9 Principal features ____________________________ -- __________ ---___ 9 Metamorphic rocks____________________________________________ 11 Generalstatement_________________________________________ 11 Lynchburg gneiss and associated igneous rocks________________ 12 Evington groUP------------------------------------------- 14 Candler formation_____________________________________ 14 Archer Creek formation________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Inverted Metamorphic Sequence in the Sikkim Himalayas: Crystallization History, P–T Gradient and Implications
    J. metamorphic Geol., 2004, 22, 395–412 doi:10.1111/j.1525-1314.2004.00522.x Inverted metamorphic sequence in the Sikkim Himalayas: crystallization history, P–T gradient and implications S. DASGUPTA1 ,J.GANGULY2 AND S. NEOGI3 1Department of Geological Sciences, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700 032, India 2Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson 85721, AZ, USA ([email protected]) 3Central Petrology Laboratory, Geological Survey of India, Kolkata 700 016, India ABSTRACT The metapelitic rocks of the Sikkim Himalayas show an inverted metamorphic sequence (IMS) of the complete Barrovian zones from chlorite to sillimanite + K-feldspar, with the higher grade rocks appearing at progressively higher structural levels. Within the IMS, four groups of major planar structures, S1,S2 and S3 were recognised. The S2 structures are pervasive throughout the Barrovian sequence, and are sub-parallel to the metamorphic isograds. The mineral growth in all zones is dominantly syn-S2. The disposition of the metamorphic zones and structural features show that the zones were folded as a northerly plunging antiform. Significant bulk compositional variation, with consequent changes of mineralogy, occurs even at the scale of a thin section in some garnet zone rocks. The results of detailed petrographic and thermobarometric studies of the metapelites along a roughly E–W transect show progressive increase of both pressure and temperature with increasing structural levels in the entire IMS. This is contrary to all models that call for thermal inversion as a possible reason for the origin of the IMS. Also, the observation of the temporal relation between crystallization and S2 structures is problematic for models of post-/late-metamorphic tectonic inversion by recumbent folding or thrusting.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State Minerals Checklist
    Division of Geology and Earth Resources MS 47007; Olympia, WA 98504-7007 Washington State 360-902-1450; 360-902-1785 fax E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.dnr.wa.gov/geology Minerals Checklist Note: Mineral names in parentheses are the preferred species names. Compiled by Raymond Lasmanis o Acanthite o Arsenopalladinite o Bustamite o Clinohumite o Enstatite o Harmotome o Actinolite o Arsenopyrite o Bytownite o Clinoptilolite o Epidesmine (Stilbite) o Hastingsite o Adularia o Arsenosulvanite (Plagioclase) o Clinozoisite o Epidote o Hausmannite (Orthoclase) o Arsenpolybasite o Cairngorm (Quartz) o Cobaltite o Epistilbite o Hedenbergite o Aegirine o Astrophyllite o Calamine o Cochromite o Epsomite o Hedleyite o Aenigmatite o Atacamite (Hemimorphite) o Coffinite o Erionite o Hematite o Aeschynite o Atokite o Calaverite o Columbite o Erythrite o Hemimorphite o Agardite-Y o Augite o Calciohilairite (Ferrocolumbite) o Euchroite o Hercynite o Agate (Quartz) o Aurostibite o Calcite, see also o Conichalcite o Euxenite o Hessite o Aguilarite o Austinite Manganocalcite o Connellite o Euxenite-Y o Heulandite o Aktashite o Onyx o Copiapite o o Autunite o Fairchildite Hexahydrite o Alabandite o Caledonite o Copper o o Awaruite o Famatinite Hibschite o Albite o Cancrinite o Copper-zinc o o Axinite group o Fayalite Hillebrandite o Algodonite o Carnelian (Quartz) o Coquandite o o Azurite o Feldspar group Hisingerite o Allanite o Cassiterite o Cordierite o o Barite o Ferberite Hongshiite o Allanite-Ce o Catapleiite o Corrensite o o Bastnäsite
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Processing
    Mineral Processing Foundations of theory and practice of minerallurgy 1st English edition JAN DRZYMALA, C. Eng., Ph.D., D.Sc. Member of the Polish Mineral Processing Society Wroclaw University of Technology 2007 Translation: J. Drzymala, A. Swatek Reviewer: A. Luszczkiewicz Published as supplied by the author ©Copyright by Jan Drzymala, Wroclaw 2007 Computer typesetting: Danuta Szyszka Cover design: Danuta Szyszka Cover photo: Sebastian Bożek Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej Wybrzeze Wyspianskiego 27 50-370 Wroclaw Any part of this publication can be used in any form by any means provided that the usage is acknowledged by the citation: Drzymala, J., Mineral Processing, Foundations of theory and practice of minerallurgy, Oficyna Wydawnicza PWr., 2007, www.ig.pwr.wroc.pl/minproc ISBN 978-83-7493-362-9 Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................9 Part I Introduction to mineral processing .....................................................................13 1. From the Big Bang to mineral processing................................................................14 1.1. The formation of matter ...................................................................................14 1.2. Elementary particles.........................................................................................16 1.3. Molecules .........................................................................................................18 1.4. Solids................................................................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Scanned
    American Mineralogist, Volume 59, pages 906-918, 1974 Domainsin Minerals Rosnnr E. NpwNnarvr Materials ResearchLaboratory, The PennsylaaniaState Uniuersity, Uniuersity Park, Pennsyluania16802 Abstract Mimetic twinning in minerals is reviewed in terms of the tensor properties of the orientation states, showing which forces are eftective in moving domain walls. Following the Aizu method, various types of ferroic species are developed frorn the free energy function. Examples of ferroelectric, ferromagnetic, ferroelastic, ferrobielectric, ferrobimagnetic, ferrobielastic, ferro- elastoelectric, ferromagnetoelastic, and ferromagnetoelectric minerals are described. Introduction and ferromagnetoelectric.As explained later, each Twinning is widely used in mineral identification type of domain reorientationarises from a particular and in elucidating the formation conditions of rocks. term in the free energy function. The distribution of transformation twins in rock- A ferroic crystal contains two or more possible forming minerals enables one to establish the orientationstates or domains;under a suitably chosen thermal processes that have occurred in the rock. driving force the domain walls move, switching the Mechanical twinning is studied by petrologists in crystal from one orientation stateto another. Switch- the analysis of flow effects. In rock magnetism, it ing may be accomplishedby mechanicalstress (a), is the arrangement of ferromagnetic domains which electricfield (E), magneticfield (I/), or somecombina- determines remanent magnetization. These are but tion of the three. Ferroelectric, ferroelastic, and a few examples of twin phenomena in minerals. ferromagneticmaterials are well known examplesof In the past twinned crystals have been classified primary ferroic crystals in which the orientation according to twin-laws and morphology, or accord- statesdiffer respectivelyin spontaneouspolarization ing to their mode of origin, or on a structural basis, P,",, spontaneousstrain 6r"r and spontaneous but there is another classification scheme which magnetizatiorrMr"t.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflectance Spectral Features and Significant Minerals in Kaishantun
    minerals Article Reflectance Spectral Features and Significant Minerals in Kaishantun Ophiolite Suite, Jilin Province, NE China Chenglong Shi 1 ID , Xiaozhong Ding 1,*, Yanxue Liu 1 and Xiaodong Zhou 2 1 Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, No. 26 Baiwanzhuang Street, Beijing 100037, China; [email protected] (C.S.); [email protected] (Y.L.) 2 Survey of Regional Geological and Mineral Resource of Jilin Province, No.4177 Chaoda Road, Changchun 130022, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-10-6899-9675 Received: 28 January 2018; Accepted: 28 February 2018; Published: 5 March 2018 Abstract: This study used spectrometry to determine the spectral absorption of five types of mafic-ultramafic rocks from the Kaishantun ophiolite suite in Northeast China. Absorption peak wavelengths were determined for peridotite, diabase, basalt, pyroxenite, and gabbro. Glaucophane, actinolite, zoisite, and epidote absorption peaks were also measured, and these were used to distinguish such minerals from other associated minerals in ophiolite suite samples. Combined with their chemical compositions, the blueschist facies (glaucophane + epidote + chlorite) and greenschist facies (actinolite + epidote + chlorite) mineral assemblage was distinct based on its spectral signature. Based on the regional tectonic setting, the Kaishantun ophiolite suite probably experienced the blueschist facies metamorphic peak during subduction and greenschist facies retrograde metamorphism during later slab rollback. Keywords: reflectance spectrum; ophiolite suite; mineral classification; Kaishantun; NE China 1. Introduction Ophiolites are segments of oceanic crust that have been residually accreted in convergent boundaries [1–3]. The principal focus of recent studies related to ophiolites has been on the spatial and temporal patterns of felsic to mafic-ultramafic rock suites.
    [Show full text]
  • Nickel Minerals from Barberton, South Africa: I
    American Mineralogist, Volume 58, pages 733-735, 1973 NickelMinerals from Barberton,South Africa: Vl. Liebenbergite,A NickelOlivine SvsneNoA. nn Wnar Nationnl Institute lor Metallurgy, I Yale Road.,Milner Park, I ohannesburg,South Alrica Lnwrs C. ClI.x Il. S. GeologicalSuruey, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, California 94025 Abstract Liebenbergite, a nickel olivine from the mineral assemblage trevorite-liebenbergite-nickel serpentine-nickel ludwigite-bunsenite-violarite-millerite-gaspeite-nimite, is described mineral- ogically.Ithasa-1.820,P-1.854,7-1.888,ZVa-88",specificgravity-4'60,Mohs hardness- 6 to 6.5, a - 4.727, b - 10.191,c = 5.955A, and Z - 4. X-ray powder data (48 lines) were indexed according to the space grottp Pbnm. The mean chemical composi- tion, calculated from electron microprobe analyses of eight separate liebenbergite grains, gives the mineral formula: (NL eMgoaCoo,sFeo o)Sio "nOn The name is for W. R. Liebenberg, Deputy Director-General of the National Institute for Metallurgy, South Africa. Introduction mission on New Minerals and Mineral Names (rMA). A re-investigationof the trevorite deposit at Bon Accord in the Barberton Mountain Land, South Experimental Methods Africa, led to the discovery of two peculiar but distinct nickel mineral assemblages.Minerals from The refractive indices were determined by the the assemblagewillemseite-nimite-feroan trevorite- conventional liquid immersion method using a reevesite-millerite-violarite-goethitehave been de- sodium lamp as light source.The optical and crystal scribed in earlier papers in this series (de Waal, morphologicalparameters were studiedwith the aid 1969, l97oa, 1970b;de Waal and Viljoen, I97L). of a universal stage.
    [Show full text]
  • Activity 2: Crystal Form and Habit: Measuring Crystal Faces
    WARD'S GEO-logic®: Name:. Crystal Form Group: Activity Set Date: ACTIVITY 2: CRYSTAL FORM AND HABIT: MEASURING CRYSTAL FACES OBJECTIVE: To verify the relationship between interfacial angles and crystal form. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The repeated patterns of the atomic structure for any mineral are re• flected by the consistency of certain features readily observed for that mineral. This similarity is exemplified by the constant angular relationship between similar sets of crystal faces on different specimens of any one mineral. Sample #105 is a representative of the hexagonal crystal system and thus exhibits a six-faced prismatic fomri. Although the faces on the crystal are of different sizes and shapes, the angles between them are al• ways exactly 120°. If you measure carefully, your readings should be accurate within ± 1 degree. MATERIALS: 6" ruler & protractor Sample #105 Sample #109 PROCEDURE: 1. Make a simple goniometer, the instrument used to measure the angle between crystal faces, by placing the ruler as shown over the protractor. Sample #105 2. Place the crystal of Sample #105 as shown. 3. Read the angle on the protractor that corresponds to the angle between crystal faces. 4. Measure each angle consecutively, holding the crystal against the protractor as shown, and record these angles below (you should have six readings). Angle #1 Angle #3 Angle #5 Angle #2 Angle #4 Angle #6 5. Compare and discuss your results with your classmates, and answer the Assessment questions that follow. Copymaster. Permission granted to make unlimited copies for use in any one © 2013 WARD'S Natural Science Establishment, Inc. school building.
    [Show full text]
  • Sulfide Mineralogy in the Ballachulish Contact Metamorphic Aureole
    Stockholm University Bachelor Thesis (15 hp) November 2012 Sulfide mineralogy in the Ballachulish contact metamorphic Aureole Ossian Åström View towards Beinn a’ Bheithir, Ballachulish Igneous complex, across Loch Leven. ©Bob Hamilton. Abstract 16 samples of increasing metamorphic grade from the Ballachulish Igneous Complex and Aureole, located in the west of Scotland, were studied in order to analyze the sulfide mineralogy and to what extent they were affected by contact metamorphism. The samples were collected from two lithologies, the Creran Succession and the Ballachulish Slate lithology, as well as from the igneous complex. The sulfides of main interest in the samples are pyrite and pyrrhotite. At the onset of contact metamorphism, pyrite disappears while pyrrhotite gets more abundant as metamorphic grade increases. Pyrrhotite also undergoes multiple changes such as 1) elongation and thinning of the grains, 2) development of 120° grain-boundaries, 3) development of pyrite-zones within the pyrrhotite and 4) the decomposition of pyrrhotite and alignment of pyrite along its grain-boundaries at high temperature. The elongation of the grains occurs in both the Creran Succession and the Ballachulish Slate. The rest of the textures, however, can only be found in the Creran Succession. The two lithologies differ by the high graphite content in the Ballachulish Slate. The elongated grains as well as the pyrite inclusions in the pyrrhotite both are strong evidence of recrystallization. The absence of pyrite in the Ballachulish Slate was most probably caused by the buffering properties of the graphite-rich fluid in these rocks, causing more reducing conditions. There is evidence against a heavy, pervasive fluid flow through the aureole.
    [Show full text]
  • Transition from Staurolite to Sillimanite Zone, Rangeley Quadrangle, Maine
    CHARLES V. GUIDOTTI Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 Transition from Staurolite to Sillimanite Zone, Rangeley Quadrangle, Maine ABSTRACT GENERAL GEOLOGICAL SETTING Ordovician and Silurian to Devonian pelitic schist, conglomerate, quartzite, calc-silicate Study of pelitic schists in the Rangeley Figure 1 shows the location of the area granulite, and biotite schist. Post-tectonic, area, Maine, by means of petrographic, and a generalized geologic map of the shallow-dipping, adamellite sheets intrude x-ray, and electron-microprobe techniques southwestern third of the Rangeley quad- the metamorphosed strata. As illustrated in enables definition of the isogradic reaction rangle based upon Moench (1966, 1969, Figure 1, the isograds have a clear spacial relating the staurolite and lower sillimanite 1970a, 1970b, 1971). The rocks in this area relation to the distribution of the adamel- zones. The reaction is a discontinuous one consist of tightly folded, northeast-trending lites; but in a few cases, the adamellite and can be shown on an AFM projection as the tie line change from staurolite + chlorite to sillimanite 4- biotite. This topology change, in conjunction with the min- eralogical data provides the equation: Staur + Mg-Chte + Na-Musc + (Gam?) Sill + Bio + K-richer Muse + Ab + Qtz + H20. This reaction should result in a sharp isograd in the field but in fact is found to be spread out over a zone which is called the transition zone. It is proposed that this zene results from buffering of fH20 by means of the equation above. Buffering of fH.,o by continuous reactions also appears to be taking place in the lower sillimanite zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Evolution of Trail Ridge Eommn
    Geologic Evolution of Trail Ridge EoMmn Peat, Northern Florida AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the cur­ rent-year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey." Prices of available U.S. Geological Sur­ vey publications released prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List." Publications that are listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" are no longer available. Prices of reports released to the open files are given in the listing "U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Reports," updated month­ ly, which is for sale in microfiche from the U.S. Geological Survey, Books and Open-File Reports Section, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225. Reports released through the NTIS may be obtained by writing to the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA 22161; please include NTIS report number with inquiry. Order U.S. Geological Survey publications by mail or over the counter from the offices given below. BY MAIL D , OVER THE COUNTER Books Books Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications of general in- Books of the U.S. Geological Survey are available over the terest (such as leaflets, pamphlets, booklets), single copies of Earthquakes counter at the following Geological Survey Public Inquiries Offices, all & Volcanoes, Preliminary Determination of Epicenters, and some mis- of which are authorized agents of the Superintendent of Documents: cellaneous reports, including some of the foregoing series that have gone out of print at the Superintendent of Documents, are obtainable by mail from WASHINGTON, D.C.-Main Interior Bldg., 2600 corridor, 18th and CSts.,NW.
    [Show full text]
  • A Systematic Nomenclature for Metamorphic Rocks
    A systematic nomenclature for metamorphic rocks: 1. HOW TO NAME A METAMORPHIC ROCK Recommendations by the IUGS Subcommission on the Systematics of Metamorphic Rocks: Web version 1/4/04. Rolf Schmid1, Douglas Fettes2, Ben Harte3, Eleutheria Davis4, Jacqueline Desmons5, Hans- Joachim Meyer-Marsilius† and Jaakko Siivola6 1 Institut für Mineralogie und Petrographie, ETH-Centre, CH-8092, Zürich, Switzerland, [email protected] 2 British Geological Survey, Murchison House, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, [email protected] 3 Grant Institute of Geology, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, [email protected] 4 Patission 339A, 11144 Athens, Greece 5 3, rue de Houdemont 54500, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France, [email protected] 6 Tasakalliontie 12c, 02760 Espoo, Finland ABSTRACT The usage of some common terms in metamorphic petrology has developed differently in different countries and a range of specialised rock names have been applied locally. The Subcommission on the Systematics of Metamorphic Rocks (SCMR) aims to provide systematic schemes for terminology and rock definitions that are widely acceptable and suitable for international use. This first paper explains the basic classification scheme for common metamorphic rocks proposed by the SCMR, and lays out the general principles which were used by the SCMR when defining terms for metamorphic rocks, their features, conditions of formation and processes. Subsequent papers discuss and present more detailed terminology for particular metamorphic rock groups and processes. The SCMR recognises the very wide usage of some rock names (for example, amphibolite, marble, hornfels) and the existence of many name sets related to specific types of metamorphism (for example, high P/T rocks, migmatites, impactites).
    [Show full text]