DOCSLIB.ORG

Spring 2015 Newsletter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Spring 2015 Newsletter Spring 2015 WGSS Newsletter Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies IN THIS ISSUE Signs Comes to Northeastern! Signs! Comes to NU 1 ! WGSS is thrilled to welcome the pioneering feminist Signs @ 40 2 journal Signs to Northeastern University. As of January Inaugural Editorial 3 1st, after ten years at Rutgers University under the amazing leadership of Prof. Mary Hawkeworth, WGSS Highlights from 2014 5 Program Director Suzanna Walters takes over as Editor- Events 7 in-Chief. Prof. Carla Kaplan of WGSS and English will New Faces 8 serve as Chair of the Board of Associate Editors. We Coming up in 2015 10 have assembled an impressive editorial board that includes feminist scholars from Northeastern but also Undergraduate Courses 11 draws on the rich resources of the Graduate Consortium Graduate Courses 12 in Women’s Studies (continued on page 2). GCWS Courses 13 Women’s, Gender, & Sexuality Studies !1 Spring 2015 Signs @ 40: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 2014 marked the 40th anniversary of Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. The journal has contributed four decades of research, writing, and art to feminist scholarship. Topics have included film, gender theory, law, philosophy, and much more. Published articles and featured art are never restricted by geography. Instead, Signs makes a point of highlighting narratives from around the globe. From the beginning, the journal adopted the belief that “truth is never monolithic” and crafted an interdisciplinary approach to storytelling. Forty years later, Signs is the leading international journal in women’s and gender studies. Check out the retrospective website at http://signsat40.signsjournal.org. Feminist Scholarship Through the Decades Yampolsky - Mujeres Mazahua (1989) Martinez - The Traits of Both (1993) Ashevak - Women with Fish (2006) (Cont.) In welcoming Signs to Northeastern we also welcome our two Signs staff members – Miranda Outman-Kramer and Andy Mazzaschi – and our three graduate assistants, Firuzeh !Shokooh Valle (Sociology), Victoria Papa (English), and Laura Hartmann (English). Started in 1975 and published continuously since, Signs is recognized as the leading international journal in women’s and gender studies, at the forefront of new directions in feminist scholarship. Challenging the boundaries of knowledge concerning women’s and men’s lives in diverse regions of the globe, Signs publishes scholarship that raises new questions and develops innovative approaches to our understanding of the past and present. What makes feminist scholarship published in Signs distinctive is not necessarily the subject of investigation or particular methods of inquiry but the effort to cultivate alternative research practices that further feminist, queer, and antiracist goals of social !transformation. Signs publishes pathbreaking articles, review essays, comparative perspectives, and retrospectives of interdisciplinary interest addressing gender, race, culture, class, nation, and sexuality. Whether critical, theoretical, or empirical, articles published in Signs generate theories, concepts, analytical categories, and methodological innovations that enable new ways of thinking, new ways of seeing, and new ways of living. Women’s, Gender, & Sexuality Studies !2 Spring 2015 Inaugural Editorial: Thinking and Doing Feminism It is with great pride and to actually increase print heritage of the journal. At the pleasure that I join the subscriptions but has also same time, new leadership distinguished ranks of editors deepened its feminist always provides an of Signs. Along with my commitments to intersectional opportunity for new vision and colleague Carla Kaplan, who theorizing, transnational for a reimagining of the project will serve as Chair of the breadth, and robust itself. Our cultural moment Board of Associate Editors, I interdisciplinarity. From the demands innovative strategies: am excited to begin this new Catharine Stimpson Prize for feminism is increasingly endeavor. Under Mary Outstanding Feminist stabilized in the (neoliberal) Hawkesworth’s inspired Scholarship to virtual issues academy as it also finds itself editorship and with the steady and the launch of Films for the fighting retrenchment around support of the University of Feminist Classroom, the last the world; attacks on women’s Chicago Press, Signs continues ten years at Rutgers have been bodily autonomy move to represent the best of enormously productive ones, ceaselessly ahead even as feminist scholarship and to pushing the journal in ways young feminist activists find offer a model of journal both structural and intellectual creative new strategies to resist them; gender becomes a more malleable and contested site, Any journal – and most especially a journal with but gendered power and profound commitments to social justice, sexual violence have hardly disappeared. And feminist freedom, and gender equity such as Signs – must currents now move in an ever reckon with what it means to “think and do feminism” more digital sea; how we read, how we know, how we teach, in an era of online everything, and in light of these and how we engage politically are other contradictions and challenges. being reformed by the Web, social media, and other forms of virtual communication. publishing to others. Mary’s and always substantively Any journal – and most staff and Editorial Board have engaged with the changing especially a journal with most assuredly brought the terrain of both feminist theory profound commitments to journal into the twenty-first and journal publishing. It social justice, sexual freedom, century, enhancing Signs’ remains, in our minds and and gender equity such as digital presence and reach undoubtedly in the minds of Signs – must reckon with what while at the same pushing the most feminist scholars, the it means to “think and do intellectual envelope with internationally respected feminism” in an era of online feminist scholarship of the journal in the field. everything, and in light of highest caliber from an ! these and other contradictions astoundingly diverse range of So, in sum, what’s not broke and challenges. geographical locations and doesn’t need fixing: we’ve disciplinary homes. Under the inherited a gem. Therefore, a That said, five core concerns ten years of Mary’s editorship, core component of our broadly animate our editorial Signs has not only become one editorial vision entails vision (continued on next of the few academic journals preserving the traditions and page). Women’s, Gender, & Sexuality Studies !3 Spring 2015 First, we believe that the field of theory and queer theory, gender and sexuality, productively women’s studies must engage. substantively reckon with the ! provocations and contributions Second, we are committed to recentering attention to local and of gender and sexuality studies. transnational racial and ethnic difference, particularly as they The relationship between circulate in and through those questions of sexuality/gender theories of sexuality and theories discussed above. Feminist scholarship has always been marked of gender has a long and by encounters and emendations, the dual move of critical productive history, arguably reflexivity and analytic innovation. These debates and revisions initiated by Gayle Rubin’s have come from many locations: from women of color who classic 1984 challenged the assumptions of whiteness implicit in much article feminist theorizing, “Thinking from lesbians who Sex: Notes critiqued the for a Radical heterosexism not just Theory of the of mainstream Politics of feminist movements Sexuality.” but of feminist Since that analysis itself, from moment, the theorists and relationship activists who insisted between that “the West” not feminist be presumed the theory and automatic site of a what became privileged theoretical known as enterprise. These queer theory voices have been has been insistent and debated and analyzed in consistent, pushing feminist theory to interrogate its own lacunae journals, edited volumes, and to engage in self-reflexive rethinking of the very project of monographs, syllabi, and feminist scholarship. From this ferment were born black feminist conferences. Signs is unusually thought, radical feminism, transnational feminism, and— most well positioned to engage head pervasively perhaps— the very idea of intersectionality laid out on with the challenges of these first by legal theorist Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw. While these discourses and to model queer/ discussions have in no way disappeared, new ones have emerged, sexuality studies with a feminist and Signs must pioneer ever more multivocal strands of feminist lens. We intend to pursue this theorizing by creating increased opportunities for dialogue and exceedingly fruitful dialogue, debate. especially in thematic review Read! the full editorial at http://www.northeastern.edu/womensstudies/ essays and special issues news_events/recent_publications/signs_editorial/ devoted to the tough questions Suzanna! Walters that come up when feminist Northeastern University This editorial was previously published in Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, vol. 40, no. 3 (2015). Women’s, Gender, & Sexuality Studies !4 Spring 2015 HIGHLIGHTS FROM 2014 Prof Moya Bailey’s Intro to WGSS work. She introduced this New Student Group @ NU class created a digital magazine. model of creating a product ! in a class to WMNS 1103. Queer Student Union (QSU) ! is! a group of Northeastern The Synthesis University undergraduate Students addressed topics LGBTQQIAP-identified
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Under Western Eyes Revisited: Feminist Solidarity Through
    “Under Western Eyes” Revisited: Feminist Solidarity through Anticapitalist Struggles Author(s): Chandra Talpade Mohanty Reviewed work(s): Source: Signs, Vol. 28, No. 2 (Winter 2003), pp. 499-535 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/342914 . Accessed: 11/04/2012 00:27 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Signs. http://www.jstor.org Chandra Talpade Mohanty “Under Western Eyes” Revisited: Feminist Solidarity through Anticapitalist Struggles write this essay at the urging of a number of friends and with some trepidation, revisiting the themes and arguments of an essay written I some sixteen years ago. This is a difficult essay to write, and I undertake it hesitantly and with humility—yet feeling that I must do so to take fuller responsibility for my ideas, and perhaps to explain whatever influence they have had on debates in feminist theory. “Under Western Eyes” (1986) was not only my very first “feminist stud- ies” publication; it remains the one that marks my presence in the inter- national feminist community.1 I had barely completed my Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Judith Butler's Notion of Gender Performativity
    Judith Butler’s Notion of Gender Performativity To What Extent Does Gender Performativity Exclude a Stable Gender Identity? J.T. Ton MSc 3702286 Faculty Humanities Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies Research Group Philosophy Date: 25-06-2018 Supervisor: Dr. J.E. de Jong Second reviewer: Dr. H.L.W. Hendriks Content ABSTRACT 2 INTRODUCTION 3 CONTEXT 3 RESEARCH QUESTION 3 METHOD 3 OUTLINE 4 1. IS THERE A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GENDER AND SEX? 6 1.1 THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN GENDER AND SEX 6 1.2 BUTLER’S CRITIQUE OF THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN GENDER AND SEX 7 2. BUTLER’S NOTION OF GENDER PERFORMATIVITY 8 2.1 GENDER AS A SOCIAL CONSTRUCT 8 2.2 WHAT IT MEANS TO BE PERFORMATIVE 9 3. GENDER IDENTITY IS UNSTABLE 11 3.1 GENDER IDENTITY BEING UNSTABLE IS PROBLEMATIC 11 3.2 BUTLER’S EXAMPLE OF TRANSGENDER PEOPLE IS PROBLEMATIC 12 3.3 BUTLER’S EXAMPLE OF DRAG IS PROBLEMATIC 13 CONCLUSION 14 RESEARCH QUESTION 14 IMPLICATIONS IN A BROADER CONTEXT 15 METHOD 15 FURTHER RESEARCH 16 REFERENCES 17 APPENDIX 1 – FORM COGNIZANCE PLAGIARISM 18 1 Abstract The idea that gender is socially constructed has been accepted as common knowledge for a long time. This raises the question how does the construction of gender work. Judith Butler proposed that gender is performative. What does Butler (1999, 2004, 2011) mean when she uses the term gender performativity and to what extent does her view of gender being performative leave room for gender as a stable identity? In this thesis I argue that Butler’s notion of gender performativity implies that that gender identity is unstable.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing a Corporeal Cyberfeminism: Beyond Cyberutopia
    Article new media & society 12(6) 929–945 Developing a corporeal © The Author(s) 2010 Reprints and permission: http://www. cyberfeminism: beyond sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermission.nav DOI: 10.1177/1461444809350901 cyberutopia http://nms.sagepub.com Jessica E. Brophy University of Maine, USA Abstract This article discusses – and rejects – cyberutopia, an idealized theory of internet use that requires users to leave their bodies behind when online. The author instead calls for a cyberfeminist perspective in relation to studying the internet and other new media, centrally locating corporeality and embodiment. The underutilized concept of intra-agency is then employed to develop liminality in relation to the experience of going online. The author then outlines different versions of cyberfeminism and endorses that which addresses the relationships between the lived experiences of users and the technology itself. The article concludes with a call for theorists to expand and enrich the concepts used to study new media. Key words body, corporeality, cyberfeminism, dualism, gender, ntra-agency, liminality, torsion There are no utopian spaces anywhere except in the imagination. (Grosz, 2001: 19) Many of the early discourses surrounding the internet were utopian in nature, claiming that the disembodied nature of online spaces creates an egalitarian online experience, devoid of the discrimination attributed to the embodied experience. Feminists, in particular, have been quick to assess the possibilities of gender bending (Danet, 1998), online activism and connectivity (Hawthorne and Klein, 1999), though not all feminists have uncritically accepted the internet as a potentially utopian medium (Kramarae, 1998; Stabile, 1994). This article recognizes the importance of exploring the feminist potentialities of disembodied and dislocated online interaction, yet calls for a more nuanced approach to understanding the role of the body and materialism in studies of the internet.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyberfeminist Theories and the Benefits of Teaching Cyberfeminist Literature
    12 Cyberfeminist Theories and the Benefits of Teaching Cyberfeminist Literature Maya Zalbidea Paniagua Camilo José Cela University of Madrid Spain 1. Introduction In 2010 I had the opportunity to interview Julianne Pierce, writer and artist who took part of the first cyberfeminist group called VNS Matrix, at the conference "Riot Girls Techno Queen: the Rise of Laptop Generation Women" at the Reina Sofía Museum in Madrid. When I asked her what she thought about present day cyberfeminism she answered melancholically: "Cyberfeminist movements are not as visible as they used to be during the 90s" ("Personal Interview with Julianne Pierce by Maya Zalbidea Paniagua" n/p) It is certainly true that the 80s and 90s supposed the golden age of cybercultures. Cybernetics arrived in the 1960s (Wiener 1968) but the glorious age of the Internet started in the 80s. In 1984 William Gibson coined the term cyberspace and anticipated the Internet revolution in his novel Neuromancer (1984). Other cyberpunk novels also illustrated a post-apocalyptic future such as: Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? (1968) by Philip K. Dick. Cyberpunk films such as Blade Runner (1982) and The Terminator (1984) received enormous impact. And some years later the Web was invented by British scientist Tim Berners-Lee in 1989, CERN publicized the new World Wide Web project in 1991, and during the 90s cyberfeminist theories and movements spread internationally. Unfortunately a climax of disillusion and a crisis of moral values has influenced negatively cyberfeminist thought, promoted by the idea that women in the third world cannot have access to the Internet, the battle between ecofeminists and cyberfeminists, and the ecological awareness of the difficulty to eliminate electronic garbage.
    [Show full text]
  • Under Western Eyes Revisited
    “Under Western Eyes” Revisited: Feminist Solidarity through Anticapitalist Struggles Author(s): Chandra Talpade Mohanty Reviewed work(s): Source: Signs, Vol. 28, No. 2 (Winter 2003), pp. 499-535 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/342914 . Accessed: 06/12/2011 07:28 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Signs. http://www.jstor.org Chandra Talpade Mohanty “Under Western Eyes” Revisited: Feminist Solidarity through Anticapitalist Struggles write this essay at the urging of a number of friends and with some trepidation, revisiting the themes and arguments of an essay written I some sixteen years ago. This is a difficult essay to write, and I undertake it hesitantly and with humility—yet feeling that I must do so to take fuller responsibility for my ideas, and perhaps to explain whatever influence they have had on debates in feminist theory. “Under Western Eyes” (1986) was not only my very first “feminist stud- ies” publication; it remains the one that marks my presence in the inter- national feminist community.1 I had barely completed my Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Question of Power and Authority in Gender Performance: Judith Butler’S Drag Strategy Charlotte Coles (University of Edinburgh)
    eSharp Issue 9 Gender: Power and Authority The Question of Power and Authority in Gender Performance: Judith Butler’s Drag Strategy Charlotte Coles (University of Edinburgh) Once I went through a border with a drag queen, who was dressed butch to Pass as a man. I was dressed femme to pass as a girl They pulled us over and wanted to see our suitcases. So we switched suitcases. He got my suitcase, with suits and ties and letters to girls. And I got his suitcase with dresses and high heels and poems to boys. They passed us through as normal. (P. Shaw cited in Senelick, 2000, p.490) So I thought I’d carry another woman’s eggs for her. I don’t mean I had a market stall. No, for lesbian couples who couldn’t have children, I had eighteen babies in a period of three years. I was prolific, I had to have me pelvic floor laminated. (L. Savage, 2006) Debates surrounding drag have proved controversial within feminist thought. When drag queens first emerged as proud symbols of the gay liberation movement, many felt a need to distance themselves from what, as they saw it, was a mocking of women. Although drag drew on the transparent performance of gendered imagery to challenge stereotypes of gender and sexuality, those performances were (and continue to be) defined primarily by male mastery of the depiction of highly selective feminine identities that focus on surface aesthetics (hair, clothing, make-up) rather than social narratives of family or reproduction. Consequently, feminist criticism has critiqued drag as the reproduction of a specifically sexualized rendering of feminine identity, which reflects persistent hierarchies of desire and desirability: of men dressing as the male-oriented version of women.
    [Show full text]
  • Transnational Feminist Crossings: on Neoliberalism and Radical Critique Author(S): Chandra Talpade Mohanty Source: Signs, Vol
    Transnational Feminist Crossings: On Neoliberalism and Radical Critique Author(s): Chandra Talpade Mohanty Source: Signs, Vol. 38, No. 4, Intersectionality: Theorizing Power, Empowering Theory (Summer 2013), pp. 967-991 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/669576 Accessed: 04-04-2017 03:00 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Signs This content downloaded from 133.30.212.88 on Tue, 04 Apr 2017 03:00:52 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Chandra Talpade Mohanty Transnational Feminist Crossings: On Neoliberalism and Radical Critique hat happens to feminist scholarship and theory in our neoliberal aca- W demic culture? Have global and domestic shifts in social movement ac- tivism and feminist scholarly projects depoliticized antiracist, women- of-color, and transnational feminist intellectual projects? By considering how my own work has traveled, and what has been lost ðand foundÞ in translation into various contexts, I offer some thoughts about the effects of neoliberal, national-security-driven geopolitical landscapes and postmodern intellectual framings of transnational, intersectional feminist theorizing and solidarity work.
    [Show full text]
  • The Costs of Exclusionary Practices in Women's Studies
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Faculty Publications Psychology, Department of Winter 1986 The oC sts of Exclusionary Practices in Women's Studies Maxine Baca Zinn Lynn Weber University of South Carolina - Columbia, [email protected] Elizabeth Higginbotham Bonnie Thornton Dill Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/psyc_facpub Part of the Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, and the Psychology Commons Publication Info Published in Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, Volume 11, Issue 2, Winter 1986, pages 290-303. http://www.press.uchicago.edu/index.html © 1986 by University of Chicago Press This Article is brought to you by the Psychology, Department of at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VIEWPOINT The Costs of Exclusionary Practices in Women's Studies Maxine Baca Zinn, Lynn Weber Cannon, Elizabeth Higginbotham, and Bonnie Thornton Dill As women who came to maturity during the social upheavals of the late sixties and early seventies, we entered academia to continue-in a dif­ ferent arena-the struggles that our fore parents had begun centuries earlier. We sought to reveal untold tales and unearth hidden images, and we believed (or at least hoped) that, once illuminated, the truths of the lives of our people-Black, brown, and working-class white-would com­ bat the myths and stereotypes that haunted us. We were, in that sense, scholars with a special mission. In the tradition ofW. E. B. DuBois, Oliver Cox, Joyce Ladner, and other pioneers, we sought to use the tools of history and social science and the media of literature and the arts to improve our people's future and more accurately portray their past.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminist Futures: Trauma, the Post-9/11 World and a Fourth Feminism? E
    Journal of International Women's Studies Volume 4 Issue 2 Harvesting our Strengths: Third Wave Article 5 Feminism and Women’s Studies Apr-2003 Feminist Futures: Trauma, the Post-9/11 World and a Fourth Feminism? E. Ann Kaplan Follow this and additional works at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws Part of the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Kaplan, E. Ann (2003). Feminist Futures: Trauma, the Post-9/11 World and a Fourth Feminism?. Journal of International Women's Studies, 4(2), 46-59. Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol4/iss2/5 This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. This journal and its contents may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. ©2003 Journal of International Women’s Studies. Feminist Futures: Trauma, the Post-9/11 World and a Fourth Feminism? By E. Ann Kaplani Abstract This article will engage with the possibilities of feminist futures. That there is no monolithic feminism is a good, it at times uncomfortable, fact: positions, actions and knowledge – constantly being contested, questioned, and debated – mean that feminism is alive and well, and always changing in accord with larger social, historical and political changes. However, the ways in which social and political conditions on both local and global levels are impacting on feminism must be addressed. The post-9/11 world is one in which we need to re-think what feminisms have achieved and how the various groups positioned under the term “feminisms” can move forward.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyberfeminism
    Cyberfeminism Kira Hall Rutgers University, Camden This is an offprint from: Susan C. Herring (ed.) Computer-Mediated Communication 1. Introduction* John Benjamins Publishing Company Amsterdam/Philadelphia In her now classic "A Manifesto for Cyborgs", Donna Haraway ([1985]1990) brings together a number of disparate philosophical responses to the increasing 1996 sophistication of technology, and identifies a new feminism. Arguing that the (Published as Vol. 39 of the series blurring of the boundaries between human and machine will eventually make the PRAGMATICS AND BEYOND NEW SERIES, categories of female and male obsolete, she contemplates the ''utopian dream for ISSN 0922-842X) the hope of a monstrous world without gender" (610). Her futuristic vision, inspired in part by the gender-free utopias of feminist science fiction, I is an ISBN 90 272 5051 0 (Hb: Eur.) I 1-55619-800-0 (Hb; US) extension of the postmodern interest in challenging essentialist and dualistic understandings of gender. With her concluding pronunciation ''I would rather be ©Copyright 1996 - John Benjamins B.V. a cyborg than a goddess''. Haraway urges feminists to give up their gender­ emphasizing icons in favor of gender-neutralizing ones. ''This is a dream not of . No part of this book may be reproduced in any fonn, by a common language," she explains, ''but of a powerful infidel heteroglossia'' print, photoprint, microfilm or any other means, without written permission (610). from the publisher. Haraway's dream of heteroglossia is born from the theoretical tenets of postmodernism, which Jacquelyn Zita (1992) claims "make[s] possible the transmutation of male to female as a matter of shifting contextual locations that 'reinvent' the body'' (110).
    [Show full text]
  • Kristen Ghodsee Feminism-By-Design: Emerging
    Kristen Ghodsee Feminism-by-Design: Emerging Capitalisms, Cultural Feminism, and Women’s Nongovernmental Organizations in Postsocialist Eastern Europe Whatever happens in my part of the world, I see it in terms of class for- mation or the formation of income inequalities. I see gender and national sentiment as only helping these class formations.1 omen of color within the United States as well as women from de- veloping countries have attacked the hegemony of Western cultural W feminism. The idea of a global sisterhood erases important differ- ences in power and access to resources among women of varying races, ethnicities, and nationalities. These critiques, however, have often gone unheeded in the reconstruction projects of the former “second world.” Western feminists and their nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) have been employed by the multilateral and bilateral aid communities to help women in former socialist countries survive the process of economic trans- formation. At the same time, many local women throughout Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) have resisted the importation of cultural feminist ideologies. They have stubbornly refused to develop a collective gendered identity to advocate for their own rights. I wish to extend special thanks to Caren Kaplan, Inderpal Grewal, Pedro Noguera, and Irene Tinker, all of whom read and gave extensive comments on early drafts of this article. I would also like to thank Gail Kligman, Elissa Helms, Valentine Moghadam, Rebecca Do- linhow, Vangelis Stefatos, Anne Clifford, Jennifer Scanlon, and Christian Filipov for various forms of help with the manuscript. The research for this article was made possible by the generous support of the Bulgarian-American Fulbright Commission, the International Re- search and Exchanges Board, the Eastern European Studies Program at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, the University of California, Berkeley, and Bowdoin Col- lege.
    [Show full text]
  • <1>Black Cyberfeminism: Ways Forward for Intersectionality and Digital Sociology </1> Tressie Mcmillan Cottom This P
    <1>Black CyberFeminism: Ways Forward for Intersectionality and Digital Sociology </1> In Daniels, J., Gregory, K. & McMillan Cottom, T. (Eds.). (2016). Digital sociologies. Policy Press. ​ ​ ​ Tressie McMillan Cottom This paper considers what intersectionality brings to digital sociology. I will use digital sociology to mean: observing social processes at the micro, meso, and macro level that are transformed or mediated by digital logics, technologies and platforms. The most common application of intersectionality in studies of the Internet or the digital is to social media. Millions of people use social media to navigate identities that are more complex than single analytical frames like race, class, gender and sexuality can fully capture. We are messy and complicated and we seem to want our digital tools to reflect that. But, intersectionality was never just an analytical tool to describe the lived experiences. Intersectionality was to be an account of power as much as it was an account of identities (Crenshaw 1991). Here, the potential of intersectionality to understand the reproduction of unequal power relations have not yet been fully realized. This is especially true of macro and meso, or institutional, analyses. Drawing on my research of online and for-profit education, I argue that black cyberfeminist theory can refine digital sociology’s understanding of identities, institutions and political economies in the data age by centering intersectionality. Specifically, I examine how privacy debates benefit when intersectional analysis reveals how different groups use strategic hypervisibility and resist forced context collapse. Classification situations offers a refinement of black cyberfeminism themes to examine how one mechanism, algorithmic stratification, differently access to and returns from digitally mediated interactions.
    [Show full text]