World Heritage 28 COM

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

World Heritage 28 COM World Heritage 28 COM Distribution limited WHC-04/28.COM/14A Paris, 24 May 2004 Original: English/French UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE Twenty-eighth session Suzhou, China 28 June – 7 July 2004 Item 14 of the Provisional Agenda: Tentative Lists of States Parties submitted as of 15 May 2004 in conformity with the Operational Guidelines SUMMARY This document presents the Tentative Lists of all States Parties submitted in conformity with the Operational Guidelines as of 15 May 2004. The Committee is requested to note that all nominations of properties to be examined by the 28th session of the Committee are included in the Tentative Lists of the respective States Parties. In order to provide the World Heritage Committee with a greater opportunity to review new additions to the Tentative Lists, this document is completed by 3 annexes: •= Annex 1 presents a full list of States Parties indicating the date of the most recent Tentative List submission. •= Annex 2 presents new Tentative Lists (or additions to Tentative Lists) submitted by States Parties since the last session of the Committee. •= Annex 3 presents a list of all properties submitted on Tentative Lists received from these States Parties, in English alphabetical order. Property names are listed in the language in which they have been submitted by the State Party. Draft Decision 28 COM 14A: see page 2 Examination of Tentative Lists 1. The Committee requests each State Party to submit to it an inventory of the cultural and natural properties situated within its territory, which it considers suitable for inclusion and it intends to nominate for inscription to the World Heritage List during the following five to ten years. The purpose of these inventories, also known as Tentative Lists, is to enable the Committee to evaluate within the widest possible context the "outstanding universal value" of each property nominated to the List. At its 24th session (Cairns, 2000), the Committee confirmed the importance of these Lists for planning purposes, comparative analyses of nominations and for facilitating the undertaking of the global and thematic studies. It also decided that the Tentative Lists would be mandatory for all properties which the State Party intends to nominate for inscription on the World Heritage List. 2. Therefore, the Committee invites the States Parties, which have not yet done so, to submit as early as possible Tentative Lists in accordance with the Operational Guidelines, with the understanding that "preparatory assistance should be provided if necessary and requested by the State Party concerned". 3. Furthermore, it is useful to recall the recommendations of the 12th General Assembly of States Parties (October 1999) concerning Tentative Lists. The General Assembly invited: •= all States Parties to prepare or re-examine their tentative lists in the light of the methodology developed and regional and thematic definitions by focusing on categories of heritage which are still under-represented on the List; •= the States Parties that already have a substantial number of sites inscribed on the World Heritage List to initiate and encourage bilateral and multilateral co-operation with States Parties whose heritage is still under-represented in the List within the framework of the preparation of tentative lists, nominations and training programmes, and to give priority to the re-examination of their tentative lists within the framework of regional consultations and to the preparation of periodic reports; •= the States Parties whose heritage is still under-represented on the List to give priority to the preparation of tentative lists and nominations; •= the advisory bodies to pursue their programmes of thematic studies and the classification of the themes into sub-themes, on the basis of the tentative lists prepared by States Parties and the recommendations of the regional experts meetings; •= the Secretariat of the Convention to support in particular the efforts of States Parties whose heritage is still under-represented on the List in the preparation of their tentative lists and nominations. 4. As of 15 May 2004, of the 178 which had ratified the Convention, 134 States Parties had submitted Tentative Lists in accordance with the requirements specified in the Operational Guidelines, 44 States Parties had not submitted any Tentative List. All the nominations submitted for examination in 2004 (see WHC-04/28.COM/14B) are included on the tentative lists of the States concerned. 5. In response to the decision of the Committee (Decision 27 COM 8A, para 4) this document presents for the first time the Tentative Lists submissions received since the last session of the Committee as a separate annex. Since the 27th session of the Committee, 31 States Parties had submitted new Tentative Lists or modified existing Lists. The number of new properties added to the Tentative Lists by these changes is 106. These properties are presented in Annex 2 of this document. Tentative Lists of States Parties submitted as of 15 May 2004 in conformity with the Operational Guidelines WHC-04/28.COM/14A, p. 1 6. In compliance with the Committee decision 27 COM 8A para 5, the complete Tentative Lists of all States Parties are accessible to the public at the following web address: http://whc.unesco.org/tentative-lists.htm. Draft Decision 28 COM 14A The World Heritage Committee, 1. Takes note of the Tentative Lists presented in Annexes II and III of this document; 2. Recognizing that the full agenda of the Committee at its 28th Session does not allow a discussion concerning the improved use of Tentative Lists as requested by the Committee in its decision 27 COM 8A, 3. Decides to include on the Agenda of its 29th session an item concerning the improved use of Tentative Lists; Tentative Lists of States Parties submitted as of 15 May 2004 in conformity with the Operational Guidelines WHC-04/28.COM/14A, p. 2 Contents of the Annexes1: Annex 1 Situation relative to Tentative Lists Annex 2 Submission to Tentative Lists since 05/06/2003 Annex 3 Africa Annex page 1 Arab States page 2 Asia / Pacific page 3 Europe / North America page 6 Latin America / Caribbean page 12 1 The content of the Annexes is taken from the Tentative List database. For ease of reference the regions and States Parties are presented in English alphabetical order. Tentative Lists of States Parties submitted as of 15 May 2004 in conformity with the Operational Guidelines WHC-04/28.COM/14A, p. 3 SITUATION RELATIVE TO TENTATIVE LISTS Annex 1 Absence of a date indicates that the State Party has not yet submitted a Tentative List in conformity with the requirements of the Operational Guidelines. State Party Last revision AFRICA ASIA / PACIFIC Angola 22/11/96 Afghanistan 19/05/03 Benin 19/06/98 Australia 06/12/02 Botswana 21/07/99 Bangladesh 17/02/99 Burkina Faso 30/01/04 Bhutan Burundi Cambodia 01/09/92 Cameroon China 28/01/03 Cape Verde Democratic People's Republic of Korea 25/05/00 Central African Republic Fiji 26/10/99 Chad India 02/03/04 Comoros Indonesia 02/02/04 Congo Iran 16/01/04 Côte d'Ivoire Japan 30/01/04 Democratic Republic of the Congo 11/11/97 Kazakhstan 06/02/02 Eritrea Kiribati Ethiopia 25/04/01 Kyrgystan 29/01/01 Gabon 18/04/03 Lao People's Democratic Republic 25/03/92 Gambia 01/09/95 Malaysia 26/02/01 Ghana 17/01/00 Maldives Guinea 29/03/01 Marshall Islands Kenya 09/11/01 Micronesia, Federated States of Lesotho Mongolia 01/08/96 Liberia Myanmar 04/10/96 Madagascar 14/11/97 Nepal 23/05/96 Malawi 17/05/00 New Zealand 17/11/93 Mali 08/09/99 Niue Mauritius 28/07/03 Pakistan 30/01/04 Mozambique 15/09/97 Palau Namibia 03/10/02 Papua New Guinea Niger 20/11/96 Philippines 15/08/93 Nigeria 01/11/95 Republic of Korea 25/01/02 Rwanda Samoa Senegal 21/07/98 Solomon Islands Seychelles Sri Lanka 05/07/02 South Africa 15/05/04 Tajikistan 19/06/00 Togo 08/01/02 Thailand Uganda 10/09/97 Tonga United Republic of Tanzania 31/10/00 Turkmenistan 25/02/98 Zambia 11/06/97 Uzbekistan 01/06/96 Zimbabwe 26/06/97 Vanuatu T O T A L 39 26 Vietnam 15/11/97 T O T A L 40 27 ARAB STATES Algeria 30/12/02 EUROPE / NORTH AMERICA Bahrain 07/11/01 Albania 14/10/96 Egypt 28/07/03 Andorra 22/02/99 Iraq 29/10/03 Armenia 25/07/97 Jordan 13/01/04 Austria 11/02/03 Kuwait Azerbaijan 24/10/01 Lebanon 01/07/96 Belarus 30/01/04 Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Belgium 02/04/02 Mauritania 14/06/01 Bosnia and Herzegovina 10/05/98 Morocco 12/10/98 Bulgaria 01/10/84 Oman 04/07/88 Canada 06/04/98 Qatar Croatia 06/10/98 Saudi Arabia Cyprus 02/02/04 Sudan 04/02/03 Czech Republic 06/07/01 Syrian Arab Republic 08/06/99 Denmark 29/01/03 Tunisia 01/03/96 Estonia 06/01/04 United Arab Emirates Finland 28/01/04 Yemen 08/07/02 France 25/08/03 T O T A L 18 13 Georgia 28/10/93 Tentative Lists of States Parties submitted as of 15 May 2004 in conformity with the Operational Guidelines WHC-03/27.COM/8A, p. 4 Germany 31/01/03 LATIN AMERICA / CARIBBEAN Greece 31/01/03 Antigua and Barbuda Holy See Argentina 15/11/01 Hungary 03/02/03 Barbados Iceland 18/12/01 Belize Ireland 28/09/92 Bolivia 01/07/03 Israel 15/04/04 Brazil 08/01/04 Italy 22/11/96 Chile 23/02/04 Latvia 30/01/96 Colombia 12/06/01 Lithuania 02/12/03 Costa Rica 30/01/03 Luxembourg 01/10/93 Cuba 28/02/03 Macedonia, Former Yugoslav Republic of Dominica Malta 27/08/98 Dominican Republic 05/04/02 Monaco Ecuador 09/01/03 Netherlands 26/09/95 El Salvador 21/09/92 Norway 15/04/04 Grenada Poland 07/01/02 Guatemala
Recommended publications
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
    [Show full text]
  • Struve Geodetic Arc Joins World Heritage List
    ARTICLE Struve Geodetic Arc Joins World Heritage List 15th July, Durban, South Africa The World Heritage Committee chaired by Themba Wakashe, South Africa’s deputy director-general for Heritage and National Archives has inscribed seventeen cultural sites on the UNESCO World Heritage List. The nominations took place on 15th July at a meeting in Durban, South Africa. The World Heritage List now numbers 812 sites in total, including 628 cultural, 160 natural and 24 mixed sites, in 137 States. Bahrain, the Republic of Moldova and Bosnia and Herzegovina enter the List for the first time. The sites inscribed during the current session of the World Heritage Committee include three transboundary sites and extensions to six sites that were already on the List. The Struve Geodetic Arc is the first survey-site on the list. The countries hosting the Struve Geodetic Arc are Belarus, Estonia, Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, the Republic of Moldova, the Russian Federation, Sweden and Ukraine. The Struve Geo- detic Arc is a chain of survey triangulations stretching from Hammerfest in Norway to the Black Sea, through ten countries and over 2,820km. These are the points of a survey carried out between 1816 and 1855 by the astronomer Friedrich Georg Wilhelm Struve and represent the first accurate measuring of a long segment of a meridian. This helped establish the exact size and shape of our planet and marked an important step in the development of earth sciences and topographic mapping. It is an extraordinary example of scientific collaboration among scientists from different countries, and of collaboration between monarchs, for a scientific cause.
    [Show full text]
  • Världsarvslistan
    http://wimnell.com/omr91b.pdf • Tipasa • Kasbah of Algiers Världsarvslistan Andorra http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/ • Madriu-Perafita-Claror Valley Argentina The World Heritage List includes 936 properties forming part of the • Los Glaciares # cultural and natural heritage which the World Heritage Committee • Jesuit Missions of the Guaranis: San Ignacio Mini, Santa Ana, considers as having outstanding universal value. Nuestra Señora de Loreto and Santa Maria Mayor (Argentina), Ruins of Sao Miguel das Missoes (Brazil) * These include 725 cultural , 183 natural and 28 mixed properties in • Iguazu National Park 153 States Parties. As of November 2011, 188 States Parties have • Cueva de las Manos, Río Pinturas ratified the World Heritage Convention. • Península Valdés • Ischigualasto / Talampaya Natural Parks Afghanistan • Jesuit Block and Estancias of Córdoba • Quebrada de Humahuaca • Minaret and Archaeological Remains of Jam Armenia • Cultural Landscape and Archaeological Remains of the Bamiyan Valley • Monasteries of Haghpat and Sanahin Albania • Cathedral and Churches of Echmiatsin and the Archaeological Site of Zvartnots • Butrint • Monastery of Geghard and the Upper Azat Valley • Historic Centres of Berat and Gjirokastra Australia Algeria • Great Barrier Reef • Al Qal'a of Beni Hammad • Kakadu National Park • Djémila • Willandra Lakes Region • M'Zab Valley • Lord Howe Island Group • Tassili n'Ajjer # • Tasmanian Wilderness • Timgad • Gondwana Rainforests of Australia 1 • Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park 2 • Qal’at al-Bahrain – Ancient Harbour
    [Show full text]
  • The Struve Geodetic Arc and Its Possible Connections to the Arc of the 30Th Meridian in Africa
    The Struve Geodetic Arc and Its Possible Connections to the Arc of the 30th Meridian in Africa James R SMITH, United Kingdom Keywords. Arc, Struve, 30th Arc, UNESCO SUMMARY This paper discusses the possible connections between the Struve Geodetic Arc and the Arc of the 39th Meridian in East Africa. Was the proposal by Otto Struve in 1868 carried out? If so, where are the results, if not, why not? Brief mention is made of the various later connections from the Struve Arc in Belarus to North Africa and hence a join in Egypt to the Arc of the 30th Meridian. Workshop – History of Surveying and Measurement 1/10 WSHS1 – History of Surveying and Measurement James Smith WSHS1.3 The Struve Geodetic Arc and Its Possible Connections to the Arc of the 30th Meridian in AfricaFIG Working Week 2004 Athens, Greece, May 22-27, 2004 The Struve Geodetic Arc and Its Possible Connections to the Arc of the 30th Meridian in Africa James R SMITH. United Kingdom 1. INTRODUCTION The Struve Geodetic Arc was from near North Cape in Northern Norway to near Ismail on the Black Sea was observed under the supervision of F G W Struve and Carl F de Tenner between 1816 and 1852. The Arc of the 30th Meridian from near Port Elizabeth in S Africa to near Cairo in Egypt was initiated by David Gill in South Africa in 1879 and was finally completed with the last section in the Sudan in 1954. The Struve Geodetic Arc has recently been submitted to UNESCO for possible recognition as a World Heritage Monument.
    [Show full text]
  • Settlement Patterns, Chiefdom Variability, and the Development of Early States in North China
    JOURNAL OF ANTHROPOLOGICAL ARCHAEOLOGY 15, 237±288 (1996) ARTICLE NO. 0010 Settlement Patterns, Chiefdom Variability, and the Development of Early States in North China LI LIU School of Archaeology, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia Received June 12, 1995; revision received May 17, 1996; accepted May 26, 1996 In the third millennium B.C., the Longshan culture in the Central Plains of northern China was the crucial matrix in which the ®rst states evolved from the basis of earlier Neolithic societies. By adopting the theoretical concept of the chiefdom and by employing the methods of settlement archaeology, especially regional settlement hierarchy and rank-size analysis, this paper introduces a new approach to research on the Longshan culture and to inquiring about the development of the early states in China. Three models of regional settlement pattern correlating to different types of chiefdom systems are identi®ed. These are: (1) the centripetal regional system in circumscribed regions representing the most complex chiefdom organizations, (2) the centrifugal regional system in semi-circumscribed regions indicating less integrated chiefdom organization, and (3) the decentral- ized regional system in noncircumscribed regions implying competing and the least complex chief- dom organizations. Both external and internal factors, including geographical condition, climatic ¯uctuation, Yellow River's changing course, population movement, and intergroup con¯ict, played important roles in the development of complex societies in the Longshan culture. As in many cultures in other parts of the world, the early states in China emerged from a system of competing chiefdoms, which was characterized by intensive intergroup con¯ict and frequent shifting of political centers.
    [Show full text]
  • Early “Neolithics” of China: Variation and Evolutionary Implications
    Boise State University ScholarWorks Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations Department of Anthropology Summer 2017 Early “Neolithics” of China: Variation and Evolutionary Implications Shengqian Chen Renmin University of China Pei-Lin Yu Boise State University This document was originally published by University of Chicago Press in Journal of Anthropological Research. Copyright restrictions may apply. doi: 10.1086/692104 Early “Neolithics” of China: Variation and Evolutionary Implications SHENGQIAN CHEN, School of History, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872 PEI-LIN YU, Department of Anthropology, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725, USA. Email: [email protected] The growth and significance of scientific research into the origins of agriculture in China calls for fresh examination at scales large enough to facilitate explanation of cultural evolutionary processes. The Paleolithic to Neolithic transition (PNT) is not yet well-understood because most archaeo- logical research on early agriculture cites data from the more conspicuous and common early Neo- lithic sites. In this, the first of two papers, we synthesize a broad range of early Neolithic archae- ological data, including diagnostic artifacts, settlement patterns, site structure, and biological remains, to consider agriculture as a system-level adaptive phenomenon. Although farming by this period was already well-established in much of North China and the middle Yangtze River basin, echoes of the foraging past can be found in the persistence of hunting-related artifacts in North China’s Loess Plateau and aquatic-based intensification and vegeculture in South China. Our analysis of the growing body of Chinese data and projections using Binford’s hunting and gathering database indicate that agriculture was differentially developed, adopted, or resisted by foragers according to measurable, predictable initial conditions of habitat that influenced diet breadth.
    [Show full text]
  • Biface Distributions and the Movius Line: a Southeast Asian Perspective
    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Science - Papers (Archive) Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health 2012 Biface distributions and the Movius Line: A Southeast Asian perspective Adam Brumm University of Wollongong, [email protected] Mark W. Moore University of New England Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/scipapers Part of the Life Sciences Commons, Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Brumm, Adam and Moore, Mark W.: Biface distributions and the Movius Line: A Southeast Asian perspective 2012, 32-46. https://ro.uow.edu.au/scipapers/4441 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Biface distributions and the Movius Line: A Southeast Asian perspective Abstract The ‘Movius Line’ is the putative technological demarcation line mapping the easternmost geographical distribution of Acheulean bifacial tools. It is traditionally argued by proponents of the Movius Line that ‘true’ Acheulean bifaces, especially handaxes, are only found in abundance in Africa and western Eurasia, whereas in eastern Asia, in front of the ‘line’, these implements are rare or absent altogether. Here we argue, however, that the Movius Line relies on classifying undated surface bifaces as Acheulean on typological grounds alone, a long-standing and widely accepted practice in Africa and western Eurasia, but one that is not seen as legitimate in eastern Asian contexts. A review of the literature shows that bifaces are relatively common as surface finds in Southeast Asia and on this basis we argue that the Movius Line is in need of reassessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Pskov from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Coordinates: 57°49′N 28°20′E
    Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history Pskov From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Coordinates: 57°49′N 28°20′E Pskov (Russian: Псков; IPA: [pskof] ( listen), ancient Russian spelling "Плѣсковъ", Pleskov) is Navigation Pskov (English) a city and the administrative center of Pskov Oblast, Russia, located about 20 kilometers Псков (Russian) Main page (12 mi) east from the Estonian border, on the Velikaya River. Population: 203,279 (2010 [1] Contents Census);[3] 202,780 (2002 Census);[5] 203,789 (1989 Census).[6] - City - Featured content Current events Contents Random article 1 History Donate to Wikipedia 1.1 Early history 1.2 Pskov Republic 1.3 Modern history Interaction 2 Administrative and municipal status Help 3 Landmarks and sights About Wikipedia 4 Climate Community portal 5 Economy Recent changes 6 Notable people Krom (or Kremlin) in Pskov Contact Wikipedia 7 International relations 7.1 Twin towns and sister cities Toolbox 8 References 8.1 Notes What links here 8.2 Sources Related changes 9 External links Upload file Special pages History [edit] Location of Pskov Oblast in Russia Permanent link Page information Data item Early history [edit] Cite this page The name of the city, originally spelled "Pleskov", may be loosely translated as "[the town] of purling waters". Its earliest mention comes in 903, which records that Igor of Kiev married a [citation needed] Print/export local lady, St. Olga. Pskovians sometimes take this year as the city's foundation date, and in 2003 a great jubilee took place to celebrate Pskov's 1,100th anniversary. Create a book Pskov The first prince of Pskov was Vladimir the Great's younger son Sudislav.
    [Show full text]
  • The Early Paleolithic of China1) HUANG Weiwen2)
    第 四 紀 研 究 (The Quaternary Research) 28 (4) p. 237-242 Nov. 1989 The Early Paleolithic of China1) HUANG Weiwen2) spread widely and existed for a long time. The Introduction deposits contained very rich fossils of mammal. 1. Geographic Distribution and the Types of The fauna exisiting in the stage from the early Deposits to the middle Pleistocene can be at least divided Before the 1940's, only one locality of the into three groups, which have their own Early Paleolithic period was discovered in characteristics and sequence: Nihewan fauna of China. That is Zhoukoudian near Beijing early Pleistocene, Gongwangling (Lantian Man) City (the site of Peking Man). Since the 1950's fauna of the latest stage of early Pleistocene many new localities have been found, of which or the earliest stage of middle Pleistocene and no less than fifteen are relatively important. Zhoukoudian (Peking Man) fauna of the middle These localities spread in North, South and Pleistocene. In the recent years, some scholars Northeast China covering a range from 23°35' to have suggested that locations of Dali and 40°15'N and from 101°58' to 124°8'E which Dingcun which originally recognized as be- includes two climate zones, namely, the sub- longing to the early stage of late Pleistocene tropical zone and warm temperate zone in the should place in the middle Pleistocene, as the eastern part of today's Asia (Fig. 1). latest stage of this epoch (LIU and DING,1984). The localities include three types of deposit: There also existed fluviatile and fluviol- 1) Fluviatile deposit: acustrine deposits of Pleistocene in South Xihoudu (Shanxi), Kehe (Shanxi), Lantian China.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleolithic Era Jiùshíqì Shídài ​旧石器时代 C
    ◀ Pakistan-China Relations Comprehensive index starts in volume 5, page 2667. Paleolithic Era Jiùshíqì shídài ​旧石器时代 c. 2 million y.b.p.– c. 10,000 y.b.p. China’s Paleolithic era, also known as the for- in Africa. Slightly later Homo erectus appeared in East aging era, started about 2 million years ago Africa. Their fossils were discovered in Asia as well. The and ended about 10,000 years ago. The large fossils of Homo erectus are the oldest human fossils dis- span of this era can be divided into the Lower, covered beyond Africa. Middle, and Upper periods, each generally correlating with significant change in hu- man evolution. As time went on, human-made​­ The Lower Foraging Era tools became more sophisticated and human Most of the lower foraging-era​­ human fossils and cultural population also increased. layers were found above ground. It is difficult, however, to determine whether stone objects from some early Pleis- tocene sites were human made or natural. he Paleolithic, literally the “Old Stone Age” (also known as the foraging era), is a prehistoric era Model for Banpo, a Neolithic (or New Stone Age) characterized by the use of percussion stone tools village dating to about 4,000 bce. The villagers by humans. In geological terms this period falls within of Banpo, despite their more advanced stage of the Pleistocene period, which began some 3 to 2 million civilization, still used many of the tools con- years ago. Archaeological materials suggest that China’s ceived during the Paleolithic era. Photo by Joan foraging era started some 2 million years ago and ended Lebold Cohen.
    [Show full text]
  • Possibility That They Are Virtually Synchronous Sapiens. in Order To
    KroeberAnthropological Society Papers, Nos. 71-72, 1990 A Case Study of the "erectus" - "sapiens" Transition in Asia: Hominid Remains from Hexian and Chaoxian Counties, Anhui Province, China Dennis A. Etler Newly discoveredfossil hominidsfrom the late middle Pleistocene ofChina demonstrate that archaic forms of Homo sapiens were either coexistent with or slightly more recent than advancedforms of Homo erectus. This is most clearly seen at sites in Hexian and Chaoxian counties, Anhui province, which date to between 150-200,000 YBP by uranium series tests. The replacement of H. erectus by archaic H. sapiens in China is characterized by the retention of a significant component of heritage features in archaic H. sapiens, overlaid by a mosaic of changes in craniofacial anatomy that trend towards modern humans. This new evidence givespowerful support to the regional continuity theory of human evolution in eastAsia. Furthermore, it suggests that the transitionfrom H. erectus to archaic H. sapiens in China was relatively quick andpossibly modulated by a heightening ofgeneflow between western and eastern Asia at approximately 250,000 YBP. INTRODUCTION per layers at ZKD Locality 1 (Chen et al. 1987; Chen and Yuan 1988). The uranium series The accelerated pace of discovery of late analyses, based on the internal concordance of middle Pleistocene - early late Pleistocene human 230Th/234U and 231pa/235U activity ratios of fossil remains in China over the last two decades bones and teeth associated with the human makes it possible to approach the question of the remains, date the Hexian site to between 150- "erectus" - "sapiens" transition in east Asia from 190,000 YBP and the Chaoxian site to between an entirely new empirical basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Вместежурнал Русской Диаспоры В Словакии Вместе Русский Журнал В Словакии R U S K Ý Č a S O P I S N a S L O V E N S K U
    ВМЕСТЕЖУРНАЛ РУССКОЙ ДИАСПОРЫ В СЛОВАКИИ вместе РУССКИЙ ЖУРНАЛ В СЛОВАКИИ R U S K Ý Č A S O P I S N A S L O V E N S K U № 5 / 2019 ФЕСТИВАЛЬ РУССКОГО КЛАССИЧЕСКОГО БАЛЕТА В БРАТИСЛАВЕ ИНТЕРВЬЮ С ПРИМА-БАЛЕРИНОЙ, ДИРЕКТОРОМ ТЕАТРА «MOSCOW STATE BALLET» ЛЮДМИЛОЙ ТИТОВОЙ «Нам, всем русским, надо поддерживать русскую классику, иначе это может уйти в прошлое...» # 5 / 2019 1 вместе Č A S O P I S R U S K E J N Á R O D N O S T N E J M E N Š I N Y N A S L O V E N S K U На первых трех местах рей- музыки «Посольство мастер- СОБЫТИЯ тинга оказались три амери- ства». Выступили лауреаты канских Университета. На международных конкурсов первом месте – Гарвардский. Тимофей Доля (фортепиано) и Камиль Мухаметдинов (виолончель). Молодые музы- канты виртуозно исполнили произведения С. Рахманино- ва, П. Чайковского, Д. Шоста- ковича и др. Текст: Сергей Баженов, Radio Среди гостей присутствовали Slovakia International представители дипкорпуса, Текст: Сергей Баженов, Radio деятели словацкой культуры и Slovakia International Университет Коменского в искусства, наши соотечествен- Фото: Ян Борбели Братиславе в последнем, так ники. Проект «Посольство называемом московском мастерства» не оставляет По случаю начала нового рейтинге, включающем в публику равнодушной. Гости учебного года Министр себя 1200 университетов из Текст и фото: РЦНК с восторгом прослушали образования и науки СР 79 стран, занял 351 место, что Концерт «Посольство мастер- классические произведения Мартина Любиова выступила подтвеждает его лидерские ства» снова в Братиславе в исполнении российских с обращением к учителям и позиции среди словацких музыкантов.
    [Show full text]