DOCSLIB.ORG

Select Bibliography on Denial of the Armenian Genocide August 8, 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Select Bibliography on Denial of the Armenian Genocide August 8, 2014 Select Bibliography on Denial of the Armenian Genocide August 8, 2014 The Case of the Turkish Advertisements in U.S. Jewish Papers. Special Report. Cambridge, MA: Zoryan Institute, 1983. “U.S. Academicians and Lobbying.” Journal of the Armenian Assembly of America 14, no. 1 (1987): 1, 6-8, 12. “That Controversial G-Word.” Economist, no. February 3 (2001): 55. Açar, Dilaver Arıkan and İnan Rüma “External Pressure and Turkish Discourse on ‘Recognition of the Armenian Genocide’.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 7, no. 3 (2007): 449-65. Adalian, Rouben. “The Armenian Genocide: Revisionism and Denial.” In Genocide in Our Time: An Annotated Bibliography with Analytical Introductions, edited by Michael N. Dobkowski and Isidor Walliman, 85-105. Ann Arbor: Pierian Press, 1992. ———. “The Ramifications in the United States of the 1995 French Court Decision on the Denial of the Armenian Genocide and Princeton University.” Revue du monde arménien moderne et contemporain 3 (1997): 99-122. ———. “Source, Evidence, and Authority: Documenting the Armenian Genocide against the Background of Denial.” In Genocide: Essays toward Understanding, Early-Warning, and Prevention, edited by Roger W. Smith, 67-77. Williamsburg, VA: International Association of Genocide Scholars, 1999. Akçam, Taner. “Anatomy of a Crime: The Turkish Historical Society’s Manipulation of Archival Documents.” Journal of Genocide Research 7, no. 2 (2005): 255-77. ———. Anatomy of Genocide and Denial: Academics, Politicians, and the “Remaking” Of History. Minneapolis: Center for Holocaust and Genocide Studies, University of Minnesota, 2005. http://www.chgs.umn.edu/histories/occasional/akcam_anatomy_of_denial.pdf ———. “Denial as a Security Concept.” Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 10 (2008): 233- 40. ———. “Facing History: Denial and the Turkish National Security Concept.” In Confronting Genocide. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice 7, edited by René Provost and Payam Akhavan, 151-57. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011. ———. “The Genocide of the Armenians and the Silence of the Turks.” In Levon Chorbajian and George Shirinian, eds., Studies in Comparative Genocide. London: Macmillian and New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1999, pp. 125-146. (Reprinted in Taner Akçam, Dialogue across an International Divide: Essays Towards a Turkish-Armenian Dialogue. Cambridge, MA and Toronto, ON: Zoryan Institute, 2001, pp. 75-101.) ———. “Guenter Lewy’s the Armenian Massacres in Ottoman Turkey.” Genocide Studies and Prevention 3, no. 1 (2008): 111-45. ———. “Le Tabou Du Génocide Arménien.” Le Monde Diplomatique, juillet 2001, 20-21. Akçam, Taner and Belinda Cooper. “Turks, Armenians, and the ‘G-Word’.” World Policy Journal 22, no. 3 (2005): 81-93. Auron, Yair. The Banality of Denial: Israel and the Armenian Genocide. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Pub., 2003. 1 Alayarian, Aida. Consequences of Denial: The Armenian Genocide. London: Karnac Books, 2008. Avedian, Vahagn. “State Identity, Continuity, and Responsibility: The Ottoman Empire, the Republic of Turkey and the Armenian Genocide.” European Journal of International Law 23, no. 3 (2012): 797-820. Beachler, Donald W. The Genocide Debate: Politicians, Academics, and Victims. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. Bilali, Rezarta. “National Narrative and Social Psychological Influences in Turks’ Denial of the Mass Killings of Armenians as Genocide.” Journal of Social Issues 69, no. 1 (2013): 16- 33. Bloxham, Donald. “The Roots of American Genocide Denial: Near Eastern Geopolitics and the Interwar Armenian Question.” Journal of Genocide Research 8, no. 1 (2006): 27-49. Boyajian, Levon Z. and Haikaz M. Grigorian. “Reflections on the Denial of the Armenian Genocide.” Psychoanalytic Review 85 (1998): 505-16. Charny, Israel W. “A Classification of Denials of the Holocaust and Other Genocides.” Journal of Genocide Research 5, no. 1 (2003): 11-34. ———. “A Contribution to the Psychology of Denial of Genocide.” Journal of Armenian Studies 4, no. 1-2 (1992): 289-306. ———. “Innocent Denials of Known Genocides: A Further Contribution to a Psychology of Denial of Genocide “ Human Rights Review 1, no. 3 (2000): 15-39. ———. “The Psychological Satisfaction of Denials of the Holocaust or Other Genocides by Non-Extremists or Bigots, Even by Known Scholars.” Idea: A Journal of Social Issues 6, no. 1 (2001): 1-22. ———. “The Psychology of Denial of Known Genocides.” In Genocide: A Critical Bibliographic Review. Vol. 2, edited by Israel W. Charny, 3-37. New York and Oxford: Facts on File, 1991. Charny, I.W. and Daphna Fromer. “Denying the Armenian Genocide: Patterns of Thinking as Defense Mechanisms.” Patterns of Prejudice 32, no. 1 (1998): 39-49. Cohen, Stanely. “Human Rights and Crimes of the State: The Culture of Denial.” Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology 26 (1993): 97-115. Cohen, Stanely. States of Denial: Knowing About Atrocities and Suffering. Malden, MA: Polity Press, 2001. Dadrian, Vahakn N. The Key Elements in the Turkish Denial of the Armenian Genocide: A Case Study of Distortion and Falsification. Cambridge, MA and Toronto: Zoryan Institute, 1999. ———. “Ottoman Archives and Denial of the Armenian Genocide.” In The Armenian Genocide: History, Politics, Ethics, edited by Richard G. Hovannisian, 280-310. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1992. ———. “The Perversion by Turkish Sources of Russian General Mayewski’s Report on the Turko-Armenian Conflict.” Journal of the Society for Armenian Studies 5 (1991): 139- 52. ———. “The Signal Facts Surrounding the Armenian Genocide and the Turkish Denial Syndrome.” Journal of Genocide Research 5, no. 2 (2003): 269-79. Der Matossian, Bedross. “Venturing into the Minefield: Turkish Liberal Historiography and the Armenian Genocide.” In The Armenian Genocide: Cultural and Ethical Legacies, edited 2 by Richard G. Hovannisian, 369-88. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Pub., 2007. Dixon, Jennifer M. “Defending the Nation? Maintaining Turkey’s Narrative of the Armenian Genocide.” South European Society & Politics 15, no. 3 (2010): 467-85. Dixon, Jennifer M. “Education and National Narratives: Changing Representations of the Armenian Genocide in History Textbooks in Turkey.” International Journal for Education Law and Policy, Special Issue (2010): 103-26 Dolabjian, Vartkes S. “The Armenian Genocide as Portrayed in the Encyclopedia Britannica.” Journal of Genocide Research 5, no. 1 (2003): 103-15. Fein, Helen. Denying Genocide: From Armenia to Bosnia, Occasional Papers in Comparative and International Politics. London: London School of Economics and Political Science, 2001. Fleming, Mark C. “Government Speech, Free Speech, and Education: The Constitutional Challenge to the Massachusetts Genocide Education Guide.” University of St. Thomas Journal of Law and Public Policy 4, no. 2 (2010): 18-30. Foss, Clive. “The Atrocious Armenians of Van: The Modern Turkish View.” In Armenian Van/Vaspurakan, edited by Richard G. Hovannisian, 245-58. Costa Mesa, CA: Mazda Publishers, 2000. Frieze, Donna-Lee. “Cycles of Genocide, Stories of Denial: Atom Egoyan’s Ararat.” Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal 3, no. 2 (2008): 243-62. Garibian, Sévane. “Taking Denial Seriously: Genocide Denial and Freedom of Speech in the French Law.” Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 9, no. 2 (2008): 479-88. Göçek, Fatma Müge. “Reading Genocide: Turkish Historiography on 1915.” In A Question of Genocide: Armenians and Turks at the End of the Ottoman Empire, edited by Ronald Grigor Suny, Fatma Müge Göçek and Norman M. Naimark, 42-52. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011 ———. “Turkish Historiography and the Unbearable Weight of 1915.” In The Armenian Genocide: Cultural and Ethical Legacies, edited by Richard G. Hovannisian, 337-67. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Pub., 2007. Goekjian, Gregory F. “Diaspora and Denial: The Holocaust and the ‘Question’ of the Armenian Genocide.” Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies 7, no. 1 (1998): 3-24. Guroian, Vigen. “Collective Responsibility and Official Excuse Making: The Case of the Turkish Genocide of the Armenians.” In The Armenian Genocide in Perspective, edited by Richard G. Hovannisian, 135-52. New Brunswick: Transaction, 1986. Hajinian, Sevan. The Armenian Genocide Denied: A Response to Turkey’s Thirteen Propaganda Spins. Second ed. Toronto: Armenian National Committee of Canada, 2011. Holthouse, David. “State of Denial: Turkey Spends Millions to Cover up Armenian Genocide.” Southern Poverty Law Center Intelligence Report Summer (2008): 6p. http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all- issues/2008/summer/state-of-denial Housepian-Dobkin, Marjorie. “What Genocide? What Holocaust? News from Turkey, 1915- 1923: A Case Study.” In The Armenian Genocide in Perspective, edited by Richard G. Hovannisian, 97-109. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1986. Hovannisian, Richard G. “The Armenian Genocide and Patterns of Denial.” In The Armenian Genocide in Perspective, edited by Richard G. Hovannisian, 111-33. New Brunswick, NJ 3 and Oxford: Transaction Books, 1986. ———. “Denial of the Armenian Genocide as a Prototype.” In Between Paris and Fresno: Armenian Studies in Honor of Dickran Kouymjian, edited by Barlow Der Mugrdechian, 571-98. Costa Mesa: Mazda Publishers, 2008. ———. “Denial of the Armenian Genocide in Comparison with Holocaust Denial.” In Remembrance and Denial: The Case of the Armenian Genocide, edited by Richard G. Hovannisian, 201-36. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1999. ———. “Forum: The Armenian Question. The Critic’s
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Ottoman Global Moment
    AN OTTOMAN GLOBAL MOMENT: WAR OF SECOND COALITION IN THE LEVANT A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy In History By Kahraman Sakul, M.A Washington, DC November, 18, 2009 Copyright 2009 by Kahraman Sakul All Rights Reserved ii AN OTTOMAN GLOBAL MOMENT: WAR OF SECOND COALITION IN THE LEVANT Kahraman Sakul, M.A. Dissertation Advisor: Gabor Agoston, Ph.D. ABSTRACT This dissertation aims to place the Ottoman Empire within its proper context in the Napoleonic Age and calls for a recognition of the crucial role of the Sublime Porte in the War of Second Coalition (1798-1802). The Ottoman-Russian joint naval expedition (1798-1800) to the Ionian Islands under the French occupation provides the framework for an examination of the Ottoman willingness to join the European system of alliance in the Napoleonic age which brought the victory against France in the Levant in the War of Second Coalition (1798-1802). Collections of the Ottoman Archives and Topkapı Palace Archives in Istanbul as well as various chronicles and treatises in Turkish supply most of the primary sources for this dissertation. Appendices, charts and maps are provided to make the findings on the expedition, finance and logistics more readable. The body of the dissertation is divided into nine chapters discussing in order the global setting and domestic situation prior to the forming of the second coalition, the Adriatic expedition, its financial and logistical aspects with the ensuing socio-economic problems in the Morea, the Sublime Porte’s relations with its protectorate – The Republic of Seven United Islands, and finally the post-war diplomacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Professional Ethics and the Denial of Armenian Genocide
    Professional Ethics and the Denial of Armenian Genocide Roger W. Smith College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia Eric Markusen Southwest State University, Marshall, Minnesota Robert Jay Lifton The City University of New York This article examines Turkish efforts to deny the Armenian genocide of 1915-17. Specifically, it exposes an arrangement by which the government of Turkey has channeled funds into a supposedly objective research insti- tute in the United States, which in turn paid the salary of a historian who served that government in its campaign to discredit scholarship on the Armenian genocide. After a short review of the Armenian genocide and a range of Turkish denial efforts, three documents are reproduced in full. They include a letter that Robert Jay Lifton received from the Turkish Am- bassador to the United States, and two documents that were inadvertently included with the Lifton letter—a memorandum to the Turkish Ambassa- dor and a draft letter to Lifton for the Ambassador's signature. After a critical analysis of each document, we discuss the harmful ness of genocide denial and explore why intellectuals might engage in the denial of known genocides. The article concludes with reflections on the relationship be- tween scholars and truth. The will to truth is cowed by pressure of numerous kinds, reasons of state on the one hand, economic necessities on the other, and, not least, the pure careerism of intellectu- als who put their expertise in the service of power as a matter of course When govern- ments and professional elites find reward in the sophistries of might makes right, truth is bound to suffer.1 Terrence Des Pres It has been said that gentlemen do not read other gentlemen's mail.
    [Show full text]
  • Was There an Armenian Genocide? Geoffrey Robertson
    University of St. Thomas Journal of Law and Public Policy Volume 4 Article 6 Issue 2 Spring 2010 Was There an Armenian Genocide? Geoffrey Robertson Follow this and additional works at: http://ir.stthomas.edu/ustjlpp Part of the Human Rights Law Commons Bluebook Citation Geoffrey Robertson, Was There an Armenian Genocide?, 4 U. St. Thomas J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 83 (2010). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UST Research Online and the University of St. Thomas Journal of Law and Public Policy. For more information, please contact Editor-in-Chief Patrick O'Neill. WAS THERE AN ARMENIAN GENOCIDE? THE OPINION OF GEOFFREY ROBERTSON, QC. THE ISSUE There is no doubt that in 1915, the Ottoman government ordered the deportation of up to two million Armenians from Anatolia and other provinces: they were marched towards Syria and hundreds of thousands died en route from disease, starvation, and armed attack. There were other atrocities committed against Armenians in that year because of their race and their Christian religion, beginning with the rounding up of several hundred intellectuals in Constantinople on April 24th. The "Young Turk" government was accused of responsibility for what the governments of Britain, France, and Russia, jointly and formally declared to be a "crime against humanity." These allies solemnly promised to punish the perpetrators, and after the war, special provisions were made to do so in the Treaty of S~vres. The United Kingdom rounded up sixty-seven Turkish officials suspected of ordering atrocities and held them for trial in Malta, but for reasons of diplomatic expediency, they were eventually released.
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of Sultan Süleyman: a Study of Process/Es of Image-Making and Reputation Management
    THE MAKING OF SULTAN SÜLEYMAN: A STUDY OF PROCESS/ES OF IMAGE-MAKING AND REPUTATION MANAGEMENT by NEV ĐN ZEYNEP YELÇE Submitted to the Institute of Social Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Sabancı University June, 2009 © Nevin Zeynep Yelçe 2009 All Rights Reserved To My Dear Parents Ay şegül and Özer Yelçe ABSTRACT THE MAKING OF SULTAN SÜLEYMAN: A STUDY OF PROCESS/ES OF IMAGE-MAKING AND REPUTATION MANAGEMENT Yelçe, Nevin Zeynep Ph.D., History Supervisor: Metin Kunt June 2009, xv+558 pages This dissertation is a study of the processes involved in the making of Sultan Süleyman’s image and reputation within the two decades preceding and following his accession, delineating the various phases and aspects involved in the making of the multi-layered image of the Sultan. Handling these processes within the framework of Sultan Süleyman’s deeds and choices, the main argument of this study is that the reputation of Sultan Süleyman in the 1520s was the result of the convergence of his actions and his projected image. In the course of this study, main events of the first ten years of Sultan Süleyman’s reign are conceptualized in order to understand the elements employed first in making a Sultan out of a Prince, then in maintaining and enhancing the sultanic image and authority. As such, this dissertation examines the rhetorical, ceremonial, and symbolic devices which came together to build up a public image for the Sultan. Contextualized within a larger framework in terms of both time and space, not only the meaning and role of each device but the way they are combined to create an image becomes clearer.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ottoman Documents and the Genocidal Policies of the Committee for Union and Progress (İttihat Ve Terakki) Toward the Armenians in 1915
    Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal Volume 1 Issue 2 Article 5 September 2006 The Ottoman Documents and the Genocidal Policies of the Committee for Union and Progress (İttihat ve Terakki) toward the Armenians in 1915 Taner Akçam Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp Recommended Citation Akçam, Taner (2006) "The Ottoman Documents and the Genocidal Policies of the Committee for Union and Progress (İttihat ve Terakki) toward the Armenians in 1915," Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal: Vol. 1: Iss. 2: Article 5. Available at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp/vol1/iss2/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Access Journals at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Ottoman Documents and the Genocidal Policies of the Committee for Union and Progress (_Ittihat ve Terakki) toward the Armenians in 1915 Taner Akc¸am University of Minnesota The author analyzes the Ottoman Archives as a source of information on the Armenian Genocide of 1915. He discusses the contradictory positions of two broad groups of scholars on the reliability of these archives, concluding that the Ottoman Archives agree with the information found in the archives of the United States, Britain, Germany, and Austria. He discusses the various categories of Ottoman documents, which mostly came out during the trials related to the Armenian Genocide, which took place from 1919 to 1921, and makes clear that there was a wide-ranging cleansing operation of the archives after the armistice in 1918.
    [Show full text]
  • The SRII Istanbul Libraries & Archives Guide
    The SRII Istanbul Libraries & Archives Guide Ottoman Archives İmrahor Cad. Sadabad Mevkii Kağıthane İstanbul +90 212 314 90 00 [email protected] Working Hours: Weekdays: 09-00-18:00 • Saturday: 09:00-17:00 Description ISAM Since its foundation, the Ottoman Empire had given Center for Islamic Studies Library great importance to registering records. The first attempt to create a modern archive was made by Grand Vizier İcadiye Bağlarbaşı Cad. No:40, Üsküdar 34460 İstanbul +90 216 474 08 50 [email protected] Mustafa Reşid Pasha in 1846. The main purpose of this Working Hours: Weekdays: 09-00-18:00 • Saturday: 09:00-18:00 organization is to gather all three state archives under the same establishment. (The Ottoman Archives, the Description Republican Archives (Ankara) and Documentation). Application and research processes are the same for The ISAM library was established in 1984, is one of the most important libraries focusing on Islamic three institutions. & Ottoman Studies as well as in the social sciences in Turkey. The library has a vast collection in a great variety of social science areas, including Islamic culture, history and societies as well as [email protected] İstiklal Caddesi 247, Tünel-Beyoğlu, İstanbul +90 212 252 41 19 From the website of the General Directorate of State Archives of the Prime Ministry of the Republic of Turkey. Turkish history, culture and literature. The Ottoman Empire registered a great number of documents in its time, and retained an array of historical sources about Europe, Asia, Anatolia, the Middle East and North Africa. Since the How to apply How to apply beginning of the Empire, Ottoman sources were retained and some of them survived until this Scholars may apply directly, by filling out the To be able to get a membership, researchers must be post-graduate students or PhD students day.
    [Show full text]
  • Ottoman Oil Concessions During the Hamidian Era (1876–1909)
    ENES YAVUZ OTTOMAN OIL CONCESSIONS DURING THE HAMIDIAN ERA (1876–1909) A Master’s Thesis OTTOMAN OIL C OTTOMAN THE HAMIDIAN ERA ERA HAMIDIAN (1876 THE by ONCESSIONS DURING ONCESSIONS Enes Yavuz – 1909) Bilkent 2018 University Department of History İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University Ankara December 2018 To My late father, Yaşar Yavuz and my mother, Derya Yavuz OTTOMAN OIL CONCESSIONS DURING THE HAMIDIAN ERA (1876–1909) The Graduate School of Economics and Social Sciences of İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University by Enes Yavuz In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in HISTORY Department of History İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University Ankara December 2018 iii ABSTRACT OTTOMAN OIL CONCESSIONS DURING THE HAMIDIAN ERA (1876–1909) Yavuz, Enes M.A., Department of History Supervisor: Asst. Prof. Mehmet Akif Kireçci November 2018 This thesis evaluates the Ottoman oil concessions in the Hamidian Era (1876– 1909), by focusing on Abdulhamid II’s famous ―balanced policy‖ in the international affairs of the Empire. The study argues that there was an Ottoman oil policy which considered the Ottoman oil concessions within the scope of Abdulhamid II’s reasonable international politics versus the European interventions seen as the greatest danger by the Sultan. In that regard, Abdulhamid II did not directly contradict the foreign oil concession demands or accept these demands. Instead, He tried to pursue a balanced policy regarding the oil concessions between the Great powers. In the begining of the Hamidian Era, the Ottoman Empire had been already dominated by financial control and restrictions of European powers especially France and Britain, which trying to locate Ottoman oil resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkish Archival Material in Greek Historiography*
    Türkiye Araştırmaları Literatür Dergisi, Cilt 8, Sayı 15, 2010, 755-792 Turkish Archival Material in Greek Historiography* Evangelia BALTA** “L’ histoire est une lutte contre la mort” Jacques Le Goff1 THIS PAPER aims to examine the management of the Turkish archival material apper- taining to “Greek space,” a geographical continuum which functions as the canvas on which the Greek populations were intertwined with time and history. The study describes the place of the Ottoman era in Greek historiography up to 2005. By employing the term “Turkish archives,” this study will focus on the sources written in the Turkish language, thus distinguishing them from the total of the archival material generated in the linguistically and culturally pluralistic Ottoman Empire. This choice was made precisely in order to remove any confusion that the definitive epithet “Ottoman” might cause with regard to the sources produced by other pre-national com- munities of the empire, such as the Greeks, Armenians, Jews, Arabs, etc. This subject imposes a watershed, which is directly articulated with the introduction of Ottoman Studies in Greece and its establishment in the 1980s as a new branch of historical studies, as well as its implications in terms of methods, techniques and the manner in general of approaching the Ottoman past. Consequently, the discussion of this subject will revolve around two axes. First, the fate of the Turkish sources in mod- ern Greek historiography which deal with the Ottoman period, called Tourkokratia (Turkish Domination)2 in the scheme of national history, will be examined. Second, the confrontation and manipulation of these sources by the now international historical dis- * In 2003 several of the author’s articles on Ottoman archives and Ottoman Studies in Greece were published as Evangelia Balta, Ottoman Studies and Archives in Greece, Analecta Isisiana LXX, (Istanbul: The Isis Press, 2003) with relevant bibliography.
    [Show full text]
  • Poor Ottoman Turkish Women During World War I : Women’S Experiences and Politics in Everyday Life, 1914-1923 Ikbal Elif Mahir-Metinsoy
    Poor Ottoman Turkish women during World War I : women’s experiences and politics in everyday life, 1914-1923 Ikbal Elif Mahir-Metinsoy To cite this version: Ikbal Elif Mahir-Metinsoy. Poor Ottoman Turkish women during World War I : women’s experiences and politics in everyday life, 1914-1923. History. Université de Strasbourg, 2012. English. NNT : 2012STRAG004. tel-01885891 HAL Id: tel-01885891 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01885891 Submitted on 2 Oct 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG ÉCOLE DOCTORALE SCIENCES HUMAINES ET SOCIALES / PERSPECTIVES EUROPÉENS Cultures et Sociétés en Europe THÈSE présentée par : Ikbal Elif MAHIR METINSOY soutenue le : 29 juin 2012 pour obtenir le grade de : Docteur de l’Université de Strasbourg Discipline/ Spécialité : Histoire contemporaine Les femmes défavorisées ottomanes turques pendant la Première Guerre mondiale Les expériences des femmes et la politique féminine dans la vie quotidienne, 1914-1923 [Poor Ottoman Turkish Women during World War I : Women’s Experiences and Politics in Everyday Life, 1914-1923] THÈSE dirigée par : M. DUMONT Paul Professeur des universités, Université de Strasbourg Mme. KOKSAL Duygu Professeur associé HDR, Université de Boğaziçi RAPPORTEURS : M.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the Armenian Genocide : Hearing Before the Committee on International Relations, House of Representatives, One Hu
    . THE HISTORY OF THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE Y 4, IN 8/16: H 62/2 The History of the A|Uf1v0(i|^enocid. HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FOURTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION MAY 15, 1996 Printed for the use of the Committee on International Relations U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 26-122 CC WASHINGTON : 1996 For sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office Superintendent of Documents, Congressional Sales Office. Washington, DC 20402 ISBN 0-16-052947-6 . X THE HISTORY OF THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE Y 4. IN 8/16: H 62/2 The History of the An^Kij^/hJ^enocld. HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FOURTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION MAY 15, 1996 Printed for the use of the Committee on International Relations 5fP 1 8 1996 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1996 For sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office Superintendent of Documents, Congressional Sales Office. Washington. DC 20402 ISBN 0-16-052947-6 COMMITTEE ON ESTTERNATIONAL RELATIONS BENJAMIN A. OILMAN. New York, Chairman WILLIAM F. GOODLING, Pennsylvania LEE H. HAMILTON, Indiana JAMES A. LEACH, Iowa SAM GEJDENSON, Connecticut TOBY ROTH, Wisconsin TOM LANTOS, California HENRY J. HYDE, Illinois ROBERT G. TORRICELLI, New Jersey DOUG BEREUTER, Nebraska HOWARD L. BERMAN, California CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey GARY L. ACKERMAN, New York DAN BURTON, Indiana HARRY JOHNSTON. Florida JAN MEYERS, Kansas ENI F.H. FALEOMAVAEGA, American ELTON GALLEGLY, California Samoa ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida MATTHEW G. MARTINEZ, California CASS BALLENGER, North Carolina DONALD M. PAYNE, New Jersey DANA ROHRABACHER, California ROBERT E.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting the Armenian Genocide by Guenter Lewy Middle East Quarterly Fall 2005
    http://www.meforum.org/article/748 This item is available on the Middle East Forum website, at http://www.meforum.org/article/748 Revisiting the Armenian Genocide by Guenter Lewy Middle East Quarterly Fall 2005 The debate over what happened to Armenians in the Ottoman Empire during World War I remains acrimonious ninety years after it began. Armenians say they were the victims of the first genocide of the twentieth century. Most Turks say Armenians died during intercommunal fighting and during a wartime relocation necessitated by security concerns because the Armenians sympathized with and many fought on the side of the enemy. For genocide scholars, the claims of the Armenians have become incontrovertible historical fact. But many historians, both in Turkey and the West, have questioned the appropriateness of the genocide label.[1] The ramifications of the dispute are wide-reaching. The Armenians, encouraged by strong support in France, insist on a Turkish confession and apology as a prerequisite for Turkey's admission into the European Union. Ankara's relations with Yerevan remain frozen because of the dispute. Across the West, Armenian activists try politically to predetermine the historical debate by demanding various parliaments pass resolutions recognizing the Armenian genocide. The key issue in this controversy is not the extent of Armenian suffering; both sides agree that several hundred thousand Christians perished during the deportation of the Armenians from Anatolia to the Syrian desert and elsewhere in 1915-16.[2] With little notice, the Ottoman government forced men, women, and children from their homes. Many died of starvation or disease during a harrowing trek over mountains and through deserts.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning to Read in the Late Ottoman Empire and the Early Turkish Republic Also by Benjamin C
    Learning to Read in the Late Ottoman Empire and the Early Turkish Republic Also by Benjamin C. Fortna: IMPERIAL CLASSROOM: Islam, the State, and Education in the Late Ottoman Empire THE MODERN MIDDLE EAST: A Sourcebook for History (Co-edited with Camron Michael Amin and Elizabeth Frierson) Learning to Read in the Late Ottoman Empire and the Early Turkish Republic Benjamin C. Fortna Senior Lecturer in the Modern History of the Middle East, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, UK © Benjamin C. Fortna 2011 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2011 978-0-230-23296-9 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6-10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The author has asserted his right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2011 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Palgrave Macmillan in the UK is an imprint of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number 785998, of Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS. Palgrave Macmillan in the US is a division of St Martin’s Press LLC, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010.
    [Show full text]