DOCSLIB.ORG

Mark Penn, Chief Strategist Date: July 9, 2007 Re: After 6 Months

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mark Penn, Chief Strategist Date: July 9, 2007 Re: After 6 Months From: Clinton Campaign, Press Office [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 1:27 PM To: Jonathan Martin Subject: CAMPAIGN MEMO: After 6 Months To: Interested Parties From: Mark Penn, Chief Strategist Date: July 9, 2007 Re: After 6 Months With two quarters of 2007 behind us and just 6 months to go until the Iowa caucuses it is a good time to see where Hillary stands and why. The bottom line? Hillary’s electoral strength has grown in the last quarter and she is better positioned today than ever before to become the next President of the United Sates. Recent polls have her at or near 40% with leads of 15-20 points over her nearest competitors. Voters yearn for change and they say that Hillary has the strength and experience to actually bring about that change. Hillary’s message: that her strength and experience will bring real change that America needs, is resonating strongly with voters. Despite unprecedented early publicity for all the candidates, Hillary’s support in the last few months has strengthened nationally, in key states and in the general election. This improvement has occurred as voters have learned more about all of the candidates. In other words, as all the candidates’ name ID’s have increased, so has Hillary’s lead. So far the debates have been the key moments where the voters get to see all the candidates side by side and they have shown just how ready Hillary is to be president and how she has the strength and experience to make change happen. She won the debates overwhelmingly and they are a key indicator of how this race will play out in the next 6 months and in the general election. There will be another debate every month from now until the end of the year, and each debate provides Hillary with another opportunity to demonstrate her experience, talk about her record on the issues, and show voters why she is the person best qualified to be president. In the latest Newsweek poll, which fielded after the 2nd quarter fundraising numbers were released, Hillary's lead in the Democratic primary nearly doubled from 12 points in May to 23 points now. Hillary's favorability has risen to 57% among all Americans, and they say overwhelmingly she has the experience to be a good president (70%). Nearly two-thirds say there is a good chance or some chance they will vote for her (62%). http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19623564/site/newsweek/ In the general election, Hillary leads top Republican Rudy Giuliani by seven points (51 percent to 44 percent) in the last Newsweek poll, up from just three points a month ago. The next closest Democrat leads Giuliani by only five points (49 percent to 44 percent), down from seven points in May. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19373524/site/newsweek/ In fact, Hillary leads Giuliani in all the latest national polls – CNN, Fox, Gallup, Newsweek, NBC/Wall Street Journal, Quinnipiac and Cook/RT Strategies. And Hillary is tied or ahead of Giuliani in key battleground states which Democrats lost in both 2000 and 2004, including Florida, Ohio http://www.quinnipiac.edu/images/polling/sw/sw06272007.doc and West Virginia. http://www.wvmetronews.com/index_forsub.cfm?func=displayfullstory&storyid=19789 Democratic Primary As observers like Charlie Cook have pointed out, Hillary has the coalition of support (women, strong Democrats, lower, middle-income and working families, Hispanics and African- Americans) that has traditionally won Democratic primaries. http://govexec.com/dailyfed/0707/070307op.htm The profile of voters supporting other contenders, according to Cook, resembles the "support profiles of Gary Hart in 1984, Paul Tsongas in 1992 and Bill Bradley in 2000. The numbers are splashy and significant but not sufficiently broad-based to capture a nomination." Hillary's support is highest among key voter groups who make up the core of the Democratic coalition: women, Hispanics, African-Americans, strong Democrats and lower, middle-income and working families. Her lead in the Democratic primary widens to 29 points among non- whites. The latest Gallup http://www.galluppoll.com/content/?ci=28000 and CBS polls http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/062907_campaign.pdf confirm the extraordinary enthusiasm for Hillary among women http://www.galluppoll.com/content/?ci=27676&pg=1 , Hispanics http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/2007-06-27-hispanics-dems-cover_N.htm and African-Americans http://www.galluppoll.com/content/?ci=28006 . And according to another recent Gallup poll, Hillary has a 22 point lead over her closest competitor among those who earn less than 50 thousand dollars per year. Every major poll shows Hillary’s lead increasing in the Democratic primary. In the Real Clear Politics average of recent polls, Hillary has a 14.3 percentage point lead, a widening of 5.5 percentage points in the last 3 weeks. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/charts/?poll_id=191 In recent election cycles, any time a candidate has had as much as 35 or 40 percent of the vote consistently across polls in a multi-candidate field, that candidate has gone on to win the nomination. In the last race, Joseph Lieberman was in the teens at this point while Walter Mondale’s numbers in the 1984 Democratic primary were comparable to Hillary’s now. Recent national polls show just how strong Hillary has become with voters nationally. (Top 3 candidates only shown below) CBS News June 26-28: HRC 48 / Obama 24 / Edwards 11 May 18-23: HRC 46 / Obama 24 / Edwards 14 http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/06/29/opinion/polls/main2999400.shtml Cook/RT Strategies June 21-23: HRC 35 / Obama 24 / Edwards 15 June 15-17: HRC 32 / Obama 22 / Edwards 16 http://www.cookpolitical.com/races/report_pdfs/2007%20poll_tpline_june25.pdf CNN June 22-24: HRC 43 / Obama 25 / Edwards 17 May 4-6: HRC 41 / Obama 27 / Edwards 14 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/06/25/poll-bloomberg-could-have-perot-like-effect/ Fox June 26-27: HRC 47 / Obama 21 / Edwards 13 June 5-6: HRC 41/ Obama 26 / Edwards 15 http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/062807_release_web.pdf Gallup June 4-24: HRC 41 / Obama 24 / Edwards 14 June 1-3: HRC HRC 37 / Obama 35 / Edwards 13 http://www.galluppoll.com/content/?ci=28024 NBC/WSJ June 8-11: HRC 39 / Obama 25 / Edwards 15 April 20-23: HRC 36 / Obama 31 / Edwards 20 http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/sections/news/070613_NBC-WSJ_Release.pdf Newsweek June 20-21: HRC 43 / Obama 14 / Edwards 14 (No tracking) http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19373524/site/newsweek/ Why has Hillary’s lead grown as voters are exposed to all candidates? Debates Each time the voters have had the opportunity to compare the candidates head-to-head in a debate, Hillary has come out the overwhelming winner. In the June 28 Democratic debate in Washington DC, 27 out of 33 participants in a Luntz Maslansky dial group (81%) said Hillary won, compared with just 2 (6%) for her closest competitor. And Hillary was also the overwhelming winner in the New Hampshire debate. Who won the debate? NH D Primary Voters (Franklin Pierce June 4) Among all D Primary Voters: HRC 45 / Obama 8 / Edwards 4 / Richardson 3 / Biden 3 Among D Primary Voters Who Watched Debate: HRC 47 / Obama 11 / Edwards 6 / Richardson 4 / Biden 3 http://www.fpc.edu/pages/institutes/poll/poll_07_0604.pdf There will be another debate every month from now until the end of the year, and each debate provides Hillary with another opportunity to demonstrate her experience, talk about her record on the issues, and show voters why she is the person best qualified to be president. Ready for Change The reason for Hillary’s growing support is that voters want change, and they know that only Hillary has the record of fighting for the kind of change they want, and the experience to execute it. In the June 8-11 NBC/Wall Street Journal poll, 61% of Democrats and Democratic primary voters said that Hillary would bring real change to the direction of the country. 56% of voters say that about her nearest competitor. 62% said Hillary has a vision for the country’s future, more than any other candidate. http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/sections/news/070613_NBC-WSJ_Release.pdf Among those people for whom change is most important – working middle-class and low- income families, seniors, working women, and people without health care – Hillary is viewed as the most effective champion. Endorsements Hillary is also a leader with key endorsements that have proven valuable in organizing support in early primary states and across the country - including former Iowa Governor Tom Vilsack, former South Carolina Governor Richard Riley, former Nevada Governor Bill Miller, Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley, New Jersey Senator Robert Menendez, New York Governor Eliot Spitzer, New York Senator Chuck Schumer, New Jersey Governor Jon Corzine, Maryland Senator Barbara Mikulski, Rhode Island Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, former Democratic House Leader Richard Gephardt, Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, Philadelphia Mayor John Street, Boston Mayor Tom Menino, former New York Mayor David Dinkins, and celebrities Steven Spielberg and Maya Angelou. Early Primary States In most of the key early primary states where the candidates are spending the most time, where voters have the opportunity to get up close and personal, Hillary’s lead is growing while the other leading contenders continue to lose support. (Only leading candidates shown.) New Hampshire Primary (Suffolk University) June 20-24: HRC 37 / Obama 19 / Edwards 9 / Richardson 9 Feb 24-28: HRC 28 / Obama 26 / Edwards 17 / Richardson 2 http://www.suffolk.edu/files/SUPRC/June_24_07editedNewHampshireMarginals.pdf South Carolina Primary (ARG) June 26-30: HRC 37 / Edwards 22 / Obama 21 May 23-26: HRC 34 / Edwards 30 / Obama 18 http://www.americanresearchgroup.com/pres08/scdem8-705.shtml Nevada Caucus (Mason Dixon) June 20-22: HRC 39 / Obama 17 / Edwards 12 / Richardson 7 April 30-May 1: HRC 37 / Edwards 13 / Obama 12 / Gore 9 / Richardson 6 http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/stories/nevada/2007/jun/24/062410708.html In Iowa, Hillary is locked in a competitive battle.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Policy and Politics by the Numbers;Аfor the President
    5/12/2017 Policy and Politics by the Numbers; For the President, Polls Became a Defining Force in His Administration ­ washingtonpost.com ­ search nation, world… Policy and Politics by the Numbers; For the President, Polls Became a Defining Force in His Administration [FINAL Edition] The Washington Post ­ Washington, D.C. Subjects: Series & special reports; Public opinion surveys; Policy making; Presidency Author: Harris, John F Date: Dec 31, 2000 Start Page: A.01 Section: A SECTION One night a week, a select group of White House aides and Cabinet members would file into the Yellow Oval Room in the White House residence. And Bill Clinton, the most polished and talkative politician of his era, for once would let someone else do the talking: a disheveled man who even friends say was ill at ease except when the conversation turned to numbers. The man was Clinton's pollster. The weekly residence meeting was the place where this president got his fix of the data that drove a presidency. As Clinton prepares to leave office 20 days from now, even his sharpest critics bow to his mastery of politics. This was a president who understood his times and became the dominant voice of them, who faced every conceivable adversity yet managed still to survive and prosper. What is less understood is that Clinton's political gifts were more than the magic of personality. They were a set of precise techniques that relied on constant gauging of public opinion, and constant responses to it in ways large and small. So Clinton's legacy is in many ways a story about polls.
    [Show full text]
  • Hillary Clinton's Campaign Was Undone by a Clash of Personalities
    64 Hillary Clinton’s campaign was undone by a clash of personalities more toxic than anyone imagined. E-mails and memos— published here for the first time—reveal the backstabbing and conflicting strategies that produced an epic meltdown. BY JOSHUA GREEN The Front-Runner’s Fall or all that has been written and said about Hillary Clin- e-mail feuds was handed over. (See for yourself: much of it is ton’s epic collapse in the Democratic primaries, one posted online at www.theatlantic.com/clinton.) Fissue still nags. Everybody knows what happened. But Two things struck me right away. The first was that, outward we still don’t have a clear picture of how it happened, or why. appearances notwithstanding, the campaign prepared a clear The after-battle assessments in the major newspapers and strategy and did considerable planning. It sweated the large newsweeklies generally agreed on the big picture: the cam- themes (Clinton’s late-in-the-game emergence as a blue-collar paign was not prepared for a lengthy fight; it had an insuf- champion had been the idea all along) and the small details ficient delegate operation; it squandered vast sums of money; (campaign staffers in Portland, Oregon, kept tabs on Monica and the candidate herself evinced a paralyzing schizophrenia— Lewinsky, who lived there, to avoid any surprise encounters). one day a shots-’n’-beers brawler, the next a Hallmark Channel The second was the thought: Wow, it was even worse than I’d mom. Through it all, her staff feuded and bickered, while her imagined! The anger and toxic obsessions overwhelmed even husband distracted.
    [Show full text]
  • Transforming Marketing Forward Looking Information & Other Information
    TRANSFORMING MARKETING FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION & OTHER INFORMATION Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements This communication may contain certain forward-looking statements (collectively, “forward-looking statements”) within the meaning of Section 27A of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E of the U.S. Exchange Act and the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended, and “forward-looking information” under applicable Canadian securities laws. Statements in this document that are not historical facts, including statements about MDC’s or Stagwell’s beliefs and expectations and recent business and economic trends, constitute forward-looking statements. Words such as “estimate,” “project,” “target,” “predict,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “potential,” “create,” “intend,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “may,” “foresee,” “plan,” “will,” “guidance,” “look,” “outlook,” “future,” “assume,” “forecast,” “focus,” “continue,” or the negative of such terms or other variations thereof and terms of similar substance used in connection with any discussion of current plans, estimates and projections are subject to change based on a number of factors, including those outlined in this section. Such forward-looking statements may include, but are not limited to, statements related to: future financial performance and the future prospects of the respective businesses and operations of MDC, Stagwell and the combined company; information concerning the proposed business combination
    [Show full text]
  • X RIMYLAN ENTERPRISES, LLC, PROJECT Index No
    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------X RIMYLAN ENTERPRISES, LLC, PROJECT Index No. APPLECART, LLC, TORMIMA, LLC, and MININO PRODUCTIONS, LLC, COMPLAINT Plaintiffs, -against- NO LABELS, INC., FORWARD NOT BACK, INC., UNITED FOR PROGRESS, INC., UNITED TOGETHER, INC., CITIZENS FOR A STRONG AMERICA, INC., GOVERN OR GO HOME, INC., AMERICANS COMMITTED FOR PROGRESS, INC., CITIZENS FOR AMERICA, INC., PROGRESS TOGETHER, INC., PATRIOTIC AMERICANS PAC, INC., NO LABELS ACTION, INC., PROGRESS TOMORROW, INC., and NANCY JACOBSON, Defendants. -----------------------------------------------------------------X Rimylan Enterprises, LLC (“Rimylan”), Project Applecart, LLC (“PAL”), Tormima, LLC (“Tormima”), and Minino Productions, LLC (“Minino”) by their undersigned counsel, as and for their Complaint against Defendants No Labels, Inc. (“No Labels”), Forward Not Back, Inc. (“Forward Not Back”), United For Progress, Inc. (“United For Progress”), United Together, Inc. (“United Together”), Citizens For A Strong America, Inc. (“Citizens For A Strong America”), Govern or Go Home, Inc. (“Govern or Go Home”), Americans Committed For Progress, Inc. (“Americans Committed For Progress”), Citizens for America, Inc. (“Citizens for America”), Progress Together, Inc. (“Progress Together”), Patriotic Americans PAC, Inc. (“Patriotic Americans”), No Labels Action, Inc. (“No Labels Action”), Progress Tomorrow, Inc. (“Progress Tomorrow”), and Nancy Jacobson (“Jacobson”), allege as follows: 1 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT No Labels owes Rimylan $3,708,214.26. Under a Binding Term Sheet, effective as of December 3, 2016, Rimylan agreed to provide political data and analytic services exclusively to No Labels in connection with the 2018 congressional primary elections. In exchange No Labels agreed to order and pay for $5 million in services from Rimylan during the 2018 election cycle – that is, before November 6, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • America and the World in the Age of Obama
    America and the World in the Age of Obama Columns and articles by Ambassador Derek Shearer Table of Contents Preface Hillary As An Agent of Change 1 Change That Really Matters 5 Sex, Race and Presidential Politics 8 Why Bipartisanship is a False Hope 11 Balance of Payments: Homeland Insecurity 14 Economics and Presidential Politics—“It’s Globalization, Stupid” 16 Beyond Gotcha: In Search of Democratic Economics 18 Rebranding America: How to Win Friends Abroad and Influence Nations 21 Waiting for Obama: The First Global Election 23 The Proper Use of Bill and Hillary Clinton 26 Clintonism Without Clinton—It’s Deja Vu All Over Again 28 Russia and the West Under Clinton and Bush 30 What’s At Stake: The Future vs The Past 34 The Road Ahead: The First 100 Days and Beyond 37 The Shout Heard Round the World: Obama as Global Leader 41 An Obama Holiday: What to Give a Progressive President and His Team 47 Bye, Bye Bush, Hello Barack: A Door Opens in 2009 52 Hoops Rule: The President and the Hard Court 55 After the Stimulus: It’s Time for a New Foundation 57 Advice to the President: Abolish the Commerce Department 62 Money, Banking and Torture: It’s Just Shocking! 65 Give Hope A Chance: The Renewal of Summer 68 Obama’s America: What is Economic Growth For? 71 Obama’s First Year: A Nobel Effort 75 Joy to the World: Good-Bye Bing Crosby, Hello Bob Dylan 78 Passage to India: Monsoon Wedding Meets Slumdog Professor 84 The Occidental President: Obama and Teachable Moments 88 Happy Days Are Not Here Again: Obama, China and the Coming Great Contraction
    [Show full text]
  • Early Presidential Nomination Polling in New Hampshire and the US
    Does the Tail Wag the Dog? Early Presidential Nomination Polling in New Hampshire and the U.S. Dante J. Scala and Andrew E. Smith The authors examine whether early state polls, particularly New Hampshire, have been more accurate in predicting the eventual presidential nominees. The authors conclude that New Hampshire poll results have become better bellwethers and propose that the more informed nature of the state’s electorate may be a reason for the accuracy of the results. “The polls went up for Hillary and the open attacks on her have begun. Related? In politics it usually is,” confidently asserted Mark Penn, Hillary Clinton’s chief strategist, in August 2007.1 What polls made Penn so confi- dent? Surveys of the national Democratic primary electorate. “The latest round of national polls last week—from Newsweek and NBC/Wall Street Journal—have shown Hillary making significant gains on two fronts— consolidating her lead among the Democratic primary electorate nationwide and advancing in the general election against likely Republican nominees,” wrote Penn. In all, the strategist mentioned five different national polls before citing a single poll in Iowa or New Hampshire. Attacks on Clinton, Penn stated, were “the result of the first six months of campaigning and the voters taking a good hard look at all the candidates and concluding that Hillary has what it takes to be President and what it takes to take on the Republicans” (emphasis added). According to Penn, national polls in the pre-primary year were indeed “hard numbers,” reflecting the results of national Democratic primary voters’ deliberations.
    [Show full text]
  • Reputation and Added Value
    REPUTATION AND ADDED VALUE REPUTATION AND ADDED VALUE Non-commercial edition Creative Commons License (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0) Developing Ideas by LLORENTE & CUENCA, January 2017 Lagasca, 88 - floor 3 28001 Madrid (Spain) Edition: Anatomía de Red Design: Estudio Joaquín Gallego prologue Reputation and the value of anticipation José Antonio Zarzalejos 13 introduction Why not collaborative politicians? José Antonio Llorente 21 politics Latin America… in search of an ocean. Reflections before the next international meetings affecting Latin America Claudio Vallejo 27 A fragmented Europe that faces a leadership crisis Tomás Matesanz & José Isaías Rodríguez 39 Mercosur Crisis: Venezuela’s Temporary Presidency Marco Antonio Sabino & Pablo Abiad & Juan Carlos Gozzer 45 Cuba, three big challenges and one destiny Joan Navarro & Pau Solanilla 61 Panama: President Juan Carlos Varela, two years in office Javier Rosado & Matías Señorán 65 Dominican elections 2016: three processes in one and more technology in their organisation. Iban Campo 77 economy and business Active Radar: Political intelligence applied to business Madalena Martins & Tiago Vidal & Carlos Ruiz 89 Business in Peru after the elections Luisa García & José Carlos Antón 93 PFAs and their Reputational Challenge in Chile Claudio Ramírez 103 Reforms 2.0 in Latin America: achieving growth through development Developing Ideas 109 Export diversification in Latin America Developing Ideas 131 communication challenges The regionalization of DirComs: between dependency and autonomy María Carolina Cortes
    [Show full text]
  • The Definition of Power in the PR Industry Is Something That Is Heavily Influenced by Current Events and Business Trends
    PR Power List 2009 THE DEFINITION OF POWER IN THE PR INDUSTRY IS SOMETHING THAT IS HEAVILY INFLUENCED BY CURRENT EVENTS AND BUSINESS TRENDS. During this challenging time, PRWeek’s senior editors weigh the different criteria to help determine this year’s ranking of 25 industry leaders HARRIS DIAMOND [’08 rank - #4] CEO, Weber Shandwick Worldwide and IPG’s Constituency Management Group 1 In 2009, the PR industry is down to business. No individual represents the shifting meaning of the power in PR better than Harris Diamond, particularly in this tough economy. He arguably holds the fate of more PR pros and brands in his hands than anyone still directly working in the business. There are 3,500 PR pros working for CMG agencies, which include GolinHarris, MWW Group, and DeVries. Diamond also has dominion over a broader range of ser- vices within IPG, including sports marketing agency Octa- gon and events firm Jack Morton. CMG revenues totaled $1.1 billion in 2008. As integration is now a stark reality, his leadership across this discrete, but broader marketing realm becomes vital for securing a range of key business. In thought leadership, Diamond has taken as his stump LARRY speech dual themes of reputation and leadership. Though FORD less trendy than the focus on innovation that at least in part propelled Richard Edelman to the top spot in the past two years, his perspectives on these two issues is in step with cli- ent pain points at a time of huge business uncertainty. Part of the power proposition for Diamond is also in the continued strengths of WS, the core brand of his empire building, and in his blunt and business-focused style, which DEFINING QUALITIES gives no quarter to detractors and naysayers.
    [Show full text]
  • HILLARY CLINTON: Hello, This Is Hillary Clinton
    CSPAN/FIRST LADIES HILLARY CLINTON MARCH 25, 2014 6:36 p.m. ET (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) HILLARY CLINTON: Hello, this is Hillary Clinton. I want to thank you for letting me speak with you about an issue that is central to our children's future and critical in our fight to restore this nation's economy, solving our nation's healthcare crisis. There is no prescription or role model or cookbook for being first lady. The future is created every day. The future is not something that is out there waiting to happen to us. The future is something that we make. Well, I have said and I believe that there's a good possibility that sometime in the next 20 years, we will have a woman president. (END VIDEO CLIP) SUSAN SWAIN: Hillary Clinton logged many firsts in her role as first lady. Political partners since law school, the Clintons survived scandals and even the impeachment of President Bill Clinton. And as she considers another bid for the White House herself, Hillary Clinton's story is still being written. Good evening and welcome to C-SPAN's year long series First Ladies, Influence and Image. Tonight we'll tell you the story of the spouse of our 42nd president, Hillary Clinton. And here to tell us of the story for the next 90 minutes are two journalists who know the Clintons well by covering them for many years. Gail Sheehy from her base at Vanity affair, she is a biographer of Hillary Clinton. Her book in 2000 was called Hillary's Choice.
    [Show full text]
  • 8/25/08 Roger Simon, Politico's Chief Political Columnist, Has Been a Respected Name in American Journalism Since the 1970S —
    8/25/08 Roger Simon, Politico's chief political columnist, has been a respected name in American journalism since the 1970s — and an authoritative voice in American politics for just as long. After the historic contest between Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama finally came to an end in June, Simon launched an intensive effort to get behind the scenes — and to the bottom — of what happened and why. He interviewed scores of well-placed people at all levels of both campaigns, many of whom have been sources of his for years. This project, which Simon named "Relentless" to reflect what he saw as the animating spirit of Obama's remarkable campaign, is the result of Simon's two years of reporting on this campaign, and decades of observing political personalities in action. – John F. Harris Introduction: The path to the nomination By: Roger Simon August 24, 2008 09:09 AM EST In the summer of 2006, Patti Solis Doyle offered David Axelrod a job. Hillary Clinton was running for reelection to the Senate and Solis Doyle was her campaign manager, but everybody knew Clinton was soon going to run for president. And Clinton wanted Axelrod onboard. Axelrod was a highly experienced and successful political consultant and just what Clinton needed. But he declined. Presidential campaigns were mentally taxing, physically exhausting and emotionally draining. There were easier ways to make a buck. Unless. “I wasn’t planning to work in a presidential race,” Axelrod told me, “but if Barack might run, well, he would be the only guy to cause me to get in.” It was not impossible.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. CHAPTER 1 Introduction “I’m no lady; I’m a member of Congress, and I shall proceed accordingly.” —Mary Theresa Norton, U.S. House member from 1925–19511 When Hillary Clinton ran in the 2008 Democratic presidential primaries, she seemed to have trouble connecting effectively with the public. After months of a campaign that emphasized her toughness and experience, she underperformed in the polls relative to her biggest competitors. While some observers argued that her strong emphasis on experience caused voters to think she was “trying too hard to be ‘the smartest girl in the room,’ ” others maintained that the focus she had adopted was dictated by the politics of gender: although a male candidate like Barack Obama could be seen as credible without much past experience, a woman candi- date would not be.2 And while Clinton’s chief strategist emphasized that she had to establish herself as a tough “father” figure for the country and not as the “first mama,”3 she was frequently criticized for being angry, aggressive, and unfeminine and was called an “ice- queen” for her appar- ent lack of empathy.4 As a journalist put it, “she presented herself as a person of strength and conviction, only to be rejected as cold- hearted and unfeminine—as a ‘nutcracker.’ ”5 When Clinton’s campaign then sought to soften her image through more intimate gatherings, more compassion- oriented discussions, and more per- sonally emotive moments to increase her “likeability,” that approach seemed to backfire as well.
    [Show full text]
  • WPP Press Release WPP Acquires Penn Schoen and Berland Nov01
    WPP Group Plc Acquires Leading US Strategic Research and Polling Consultancy, Penn, Schoen and Berland 16 November 2001 WPP announces that it has acquired 100% of Penn, Schoen and Berland Associates, Inc., (“PS&B”), a leading US strategic research and polling consultancy. Founded in 1973, and headquartered in Washington DC, the agency employs 81 people across five locations: Washington DC, New York, Denver, Aurora (Colorado) and Houston. The company had revenues of US $31.4million for the calendar year 2000 and net assets of $4.3million as at 31 December 2000. PS&B provides a range of services including research-based strategic counsel for corporations and associations, and political polling and strategy. It has developed innovative techniques for developing and deploying the right message in a corporate or political campaign. These methods were chronicled in Time Magazine, which called them the “Masters of Message.” PS&B’s most well-known political successes include its work on President Bill Clinton’s successful re-election campaign in 1996, and the election of Sen. Hillary Clinton in New York. The firm has been successful in the elections of 15 international heads of state. More recently the firm worked for New York City Mayor-elect Michael Bloomberg in his upset victory earlier this month. But the vast majority of Penn, Schoen and Berland’s business has been applying these skills to corporate situations, in brand positioning and messaging, and especially helping businesses fend off competitive challenges in the marketplace. Major corporate clients over the years have included AT&T, Coca Cola, American Express, BP, Novartis and Microsoft.
    [Show full text]