Re-Assessment of Known Occurrences and Additional Surveys for Rare Species at Camp Grayling Maneuver Training Center

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Re-Assessment of Known Occurrences and Additional Surveys for Rare Species at Camp Grayling Maneuver Training Center Re-assessment of Known Occurrences and Additional Surveys for Rare Species at Camp Grayling Maneuver Training Center Prepared by: Phyllis J. Higman David L. Cuthrell Michael Monfils Michigan Natural Features Inventory P.O. Box 30444 Lansing, MI 48909-7944 For: Michigan Department of Military and Veterans Affairs Camp Grayling, Michigan 49739 Report Number 2005-07 April 8, 2005 Cover Photos: Near Howe’s Lake, Kalkaska County, Michigan, June 2004. Lower left: Hill’s Thistle (Cirsium hillii) Crawford County, MI., September 2004. Lower right: Dusted skipper (Atrytonopsis hianna) adult near Howe’s Lake, Kalkaska County, MI., June 2004. All photos by David L. Cuthrell, MNFI. Recommended Citation: Higman, P.J., D.L. Cuthrell, and M. Monfils. 2005. Re-assessment of Known Occurrences and Additional Surveys for Rare Species at Camp Grayling Maneuver Training Center. Report number MNFI 2005-07. Report to Michigan Department of Military and Veterans Affairs, Camp Grayling, MI. 49739. 16 pp + appendices. Copyright 2005 MSU Board of Trustees Executive Summary Surveys were conducted in 2004 at the Four occurrences of Red-shouldered Camp Graying Maneuver Training Center to Hawk and one occurrence each of Common re-assess the status of previously docu- Loon and American Bittern were found in mented rare plant and animal occurrences 2004, all species that had not been previ- and to search for additional occurrences of ously documented at the Camp. In addition, these or other rare species. Twenty-one two Kirtland’s Warbler occurrences were re- plant species, ten birds, and three insects confirmed and updated. Seven occurrences were targeted for survey in twelve natural of the dusted skipper, also a species new to community types. the Camp, were discovered. One secretive All but three previously known occur- locust site was newly documented, and one rences of Hill’s thistle, rough fescue, and previously known locust occurrences was Alleghany plum were re-confirmed during expanded significantly in extent. the 1995 surveys, and numerous new clus- Implementation of a large-scale pine ters of these species were documented. barrens restoration plan, using a carefully Houghton’s goldenrod, prairie dropseed, designed prescribed fire protocol will bene- Vasey’s rush, Clinton’s bulrush and New fit at least three rare plant, one bird, and two England violet were found flourishing in the insect species. Protection and management large northern wet-mesic prairie wetland of the northern wet-mesic prairie complex complex identified in 1992-93. A second will benefit at least six rare plants and two small occurrence of Houghton’s goldenrod rare insects. Monitoring the results of man- along the north side of M-93 was destroyed agement activities for these two significant by an ORV trail; however additional colo- landscape areas will also provide valuable nies were located nearby. The single iso- information to the scientific community and lated co-occurrence of Houghton’s golden- inform future management decisions. rod and prairie dropseed found in 1993 in Surveys should be conducted periodi- some dirt mounds along a Portage Creek cally for the rare plant species not re- tributary, was not re-discovered, nor were discovered in 2004, to assess their status and occurrences of Canada rice grass, prairie mitigate potential threats. It is recom- moonwort, whorled pogonia, or northern mended that this be done annually for the appressed clubmoss. It is quite likely, how- fleshy stitchwort occurrence which is one of ever, that these latter species still persist at only two known in the state. Additional the Camp near their original location or in surveys are also recommended for American similar habitat near-by. No additional listed Bittern, Prairie Warbler, Black-backed War- plant species were discovered in 2004. bler, Common Loon, several rare grassland songbirds, and blazing star borer moth. Surveys for rare species - i Surveys for rare species - ii Table of Contents Executive Summary ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ i Table of Contents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------iii Introduction ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 Study Area -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 Methods --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------2 Field Preparation ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------2 Survey Strategy and Techniques ----------------------------------------------------------------------4 Rare Plant Species------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 Rare Bird Species ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 Rare Insect Species-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 Data Management ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 Results and Discussion---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------5 Rare Plant Species ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------5 Pine Barrens ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------6 Rough fescue ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------6 Hill’s thistle -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------6 Alleghany plum ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------6 Canada rice grass ------------------------------------------------------------------------------7 Poor Conifer Swamp --------------------------------------------------------------------------------7 Northern appressed clubmoss -----------------------------------------------------------------7 Dry-mesic northern forest --------------------------------------------------------------------------7 Whorled pogonia -------------------------------------------------------------------------------7 Northern wet-mesic prairie -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 Houghton’s goldenrod -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 Prairie dropseed --------------------------------------------------------------------------------9 Vasey’s rush--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------9 Clinton’s bulrush -------------------------------------------------------------------------------9 New England violet -----------------------------------------------------------------------------9 Emergent Marsh ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 Fleshy stitchwort ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 10 Artificially Disturbed Sites ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 Prairie moonwort ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 Rare Bird Species -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 Pine Barrens ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11 Kirtland’s Warbler --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11 Prairie Warbler ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11 Large Open Grasslands --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11 Grassland songbirds ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11 Dry-mesic Northern Forest ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 12 Red-shouldered Hawk ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 12 Mesic Northern Forest----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12 Northern Goshawk --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12 Red-shouldered Hawk ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 12 Dry Northern Forest ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13 Black-backed Woodpecker ------------------------------------------------------------------ 13 Red-shouldered Hawk ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 13 Northern Wet Meadow --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13 American Bittern ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 13 Surveys for rare species - iii Lakes ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 13 Common Loon --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13 Rare Insect Species ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 13 Pine Barrens/Dry Sand Prairie ------------------------------------------------------------------- 14 Dusted skipper -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 14 Blazing star borer moth ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 14 Secretive locust -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recommended publications
  • Cytotaxonomy of the Genus Echinochloa in Louisiana. James Howard Brooks Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1969 Cytotaxonomy of the Genus Echinochloa in Louisiana. James Howard Brooks Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Brooks, James Howard, "Cytotaxonomy of the Genus Echinochloa in Louisiana." (1969). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 1640. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/1640 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 70-9040 BROOKS, James Howard, 1932- CYTOTAXONOMY OF THE GENUS ECHINOCHLOA i IN LOUISIANA. j The Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Ph.D., 1969 Agronomy University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan CYTOTAXONOMY OF THE GENUS ECHINOCHLOA IN LOUISIANA A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Botany and Plant Pathology by James Howard Brooks B.S., Stephen F. Austin State College, 1957 M .S., Stephen F. Austin State College, 1964 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to express his sincere appreciation to Dr. Clair A. Brown for serving as chairman of his committee, for aid in selecting the problem, guidance throughout the study, and helpful suggestions for improving the manuscript and companionship during some of the collecting trips.
    [Show full text]
  • Pru Nus Contains Many Species and Cultivars, Pru Nus Including Both Fruits and Woody Ornamentals
    ;J. N l\J d.000 A~ :J-6 '. AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA • The genus Pru nus contains many species and cultivars, Pru nus including both fruits and woody ornamentals. The arboretum's Prunus maacki (Amur Cherry). This small tree has bright, emphasis is on the ornamental plants. brownish-yellow bark that flakes off in papery strips. It is par­ Prunus americana (American Plum). This small tree furnishes ticularly attractive in winter when the stems contrast with the fruits prized for making preserves and is also an ornamental. snow. The flowers and fruits are produced in drooping racemes In early May, the trees are covered with a "snowball" bloom similar to those of our native chokecherry. This plant is ex­ of white flowers. If these blooms escape the spring frosts, tremely hardy and well worth growing. there will be a crop of colorful fruits in the fall. The trees Prunus maritima (Beach Plum). This species is native to the sucker freely, and unless controlled, a thicket results. The A­ coastal plains from Maine to Virginia. It's a sprawling shrub merican Plum is excellent for conservation purposes, and the reaching a height of about 6 feet. It blooms early with small thickets are favorite refuges for birds and wildlife. white flowers. Our plants have shown varying degrees of die­ Prunus amygdalus (Almond). Several cultivars of almonds­ back and have been removed for this reason. including 'Halls' and 'Princess'-have been tested. Although Prunus 'Minnesota Purple.' This cultivar was named by the the plants survived and even flowered, each winter's dieback University of Minnesota in 1920.
    [Show full text]
  • Papilio Glaucus, P. Marcellus, P. Philenor, Pieris Rapae, Colias Philo Dice, Antho­ Caris Genutia, Anaea Andria, Euptychia Gemma
    102 REMINGTON: 1952 Central Season Vol.7, nos.3·4 Papilio glaucus, P. marcellus, P. philenor, Pieris rapae, Colias philo dice, Antho­ caris genutia, Anaea andria, Euptychia gemma. One exception to the general scarcity was the large number of Erynnis brizo and E. juvenalis which were seen clustered around damp spots in a dry branch on April 9. MERRITT counted 67 Erynnis and 2 Papilio glaucus around one such spOt and 45 Erynnis around another. Only one specimen of Incisalia henrici was seen this spring. MERRITT was pleased to find Incisalia niphon still present in a small tract of pine although the area was swept by a ground fire in 1951. Vanessa cardui appeared sparingly from June 12 on, the first since 1947. In the late summer the season appeared normal. Eurema lisa, Nathalis iole, Lycaena thoe, and Hylephila phyleus were common. Junonia coenia was more abundant around Louisville than he has ever seen it. A rarity taken in Louisville this fall was Atlides halesus, the first seen since 1948. The latest seasonal record made by Merritt was a specimen of Colias eury­ theme flying south very fast on December 7. EDWARD WELLING sent a record of finding Lagoa crispata on June 27 at Covington. Contributors: F. R. ARNHOLD; E. G. BAILEY; RALPH BEEBE; S. M. COX; H. V. DALY; 1. W . GRIEWISCH; J. B. HAYES; R. W. HODGES; VONTA P. HYNES; R. LEUSCHNER; J. R. MERRITT; J. H. NEWMAN; M. C. NIEL­ SEN; 1. S. PHILLIPS; P. S. REMINGTON; WM. SIEKER; EDWARD VOSS; W. H . WAGNER, JR.; E. C.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Adaptive Genetic Variation for Conservation and Management of the European Grayling (Thymallus Thymallus)
    Assessing adaptive genetic variation for conservation and management of the European grayling (Thymallus thymallus) J. V. Huml PhD 2017 Assessing adaptive genetic variation for conservation and management of the European grayling (Thymallus thymallus) Jana Vanessa Huml A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the Manchester Metropolitan University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2017 Faculty of Science and Engineering Manchester Metropolitan University Abstract In this PhD, functional genetic variation of European grayling (Thymallus thymallus) is assessed to inform conservation and management of the species. This study is the first to characterize immune variation at the Major Histocompatibility complex (MHC) in grayling. The MHC is a marker of high ecological relevance, because of the strong association between immunity and fitness. Taking advantage of advances in sequencing technology, an analytical pipeline optimized for high-throughput, efficient and accurate genotyping of multi-gene families in non-model species is presented. Immune genetic variation is compared to neutral marker data. Results confirm the hypothesis that neutral marker variation does not predict immune genetic variation. Further, the possible effect of supplementing wild populations with hatchery-reared fish on immune genetic variation is evaluated. Significantly lower estimates of heterozygosity were found in stocked than purely native populations. Lower differentiation at immune genes than at neutral markers are indicative of the effects of balancing selection acting upon the MHC, within purely native, but not stocked populations. Furthermore species distribution modelling is used to identify environmental parameters shaping the distribution of grayling. To evaluate risks imposed by climate change, the sensitivity of grayling to climatic variables and range changes under predicted future scenarios are assessed.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description
    Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description Prepared by: Michael A. Kost, Dennis A. Albert, Joshua G. Cohen, Bradford S. Slaughter, Rebecca K. Schillo, Christopher R. Weber, and Kim A. Chapman Michigan Natural Features Inventory P.O. Box 13036 Lansing, MI 48901-3036 For: Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division and Forest, Mineral and Fire Management Division September 30, 2007 Report Number 2007-21 Version 1.2 Last Updated: July 9, 2010 Suggested Citation: Kost, M.A., D.A. Albert, J.G. Cohen, B.S. Slaughter, R.K. Schillo, C.R. Weber, and K.A. Chapman. 2007. Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description. Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Report Number 2007-21, Lansing, MI. 314 pp. Copyright 2007 Michigan State University Board of Trustees. Michigan State University Extension programs and materials are open to all without regard to race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, marital status or family status. Cover photos: Top left, Dry Sand Prairie at Indian Lake, Newaygo County (M. Kost); top right, Limestone Bedrock Lakeshore, Summer Island, Delta County (J. Cohen); lower left, Muskeg, Luce County (J. Cohen); and lower right, Mesic Northern Forest as a matrix natural community, Porcupine Mountains Wilderness State Park, Ontonagon County (M. Kost). Acknowledgements We thank the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division and Forest, Mineral, and Fire Management Division for funding this effort to classify and describe the natural communities of Michigan. This work relied heavily on data collected by many present and former Michigan Natural Features Inventory (MNFI) field scientists and collaborators, including members of the Michigan Natural Areas Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Epilobium (Onagraceae) from the Western Mediterranean
    NOTES ON EPILOBIUM (ONAGRACEAE) FROM THE WESTERN MEDITERRANEAN by GONZALO NETO FELINER* Resumen NIETO FELINER, G. (1996). Notas sobre los Epilobium (Onagraceae) del Mediterráneo occidental. Anales Jard. Bot. Madrid 54: 255-264 (en inglés). Aportaciones taxonómicas sobre el género Epilobium que son consecuencia de la revisión lle- vada a cabo para producir una síntesis genérica destinada a Flora iberica. En particular, se acla- ran nombres tales como E. mutabile Boiss. & Reut., E. carpetanum Willk., E. psilotum Maire & Samuelsson o E. salcedoi Vicioso, así como varios creados por Sennen (E. barcinonense, E. gredillae, E. losae, E. rigatum, E. barnadesianum, E. debile, E. costeanum) y por Merino (£. maciae, E. simulans, E. tudense y E. lucense). Asimismo, se discute en detalle el problema de E. lamyi F.W. Schultz; en especial, se aclara el uso de dicho nombre por parte de botánicos que han trabajado en España y Portugal, y se rechazan las citas peninsulares del mismo. Se explican algunos problemas taxonómicos derivados de la variabilidad morfológica que exhiben E. duriaei, E. montanum, E. lanceolatum, E. collinum, E. tetragonum subsp. tournefortii y E. obscurum. De este último, adicionalmente, se aportan algunos datos de interés corológico. Palabras clave: Spermatophyta, Epilobium, Onagraceae, taxonomía, corología, Mediterráneo occidental. Abstract NIETO FELINER, G. (1996). Notes on Epilobium (Onagraceae) from the western Mediterranean. Anales Jard. Bot. Madrid 54: 255-264. The present taxonomic notes are part of the results of a revisión of Epilobium carried out for the "Flora iberica" project. The identity of diverse ñames is clarified, including E. mutabile Boiss. & Reut., E. carpetanum Willk., E. psilotum Maire & Samuelsson, E.
    [Show full text]
  • The Grayling Society the Journal Of
    © The Journal of The Grayling Society Volume 27 - Number 1 • Winter 2015 © C O N T E N T S The Official Journal of Editorial Bob Male 2 The Grayling Society 39th Symposium and AGM; Chairman’s Report Steve Skuce 4 ISSN 1476-0061 39th Symposium and AGM 6 Free to all our Members in - Poet’s Corner 14 Australia Lithuania Austria Luxembourg Grayling Fly Fisher’s Paradise Dave Martin 16 Belgium Netherlands Canada New Zealand Drag? - An Annan Revelation Alan Ayre 20 China Norway Denmark Poland The Novice Angler - Part 2 The Novice 21 Eire Portugal England Scotland Area News and Fishing Days 24 Finland Slovenia France Sweden My First Area Day Paul Deaville 26 Germany Switzerland Italy U. S. A. Not a Grayling Sunday 27 Isle of Man Wales Update on the Fate of Grayling Editor - Bob Male in North-East and East Yorkshire Dave Southall 30 Telephone: 01722 503939 e-mail: [email protected] Big Grayling 2 Robin Mulholland 34 Advertising - Rod Calbrade Arctic Grayling Haven Dave Radcliffe 35 Subscriptions per annum: Full £28.00, Joint £47.00 What do Fish from the River Alyn Eat? Led Jervis 38 Senior (over 70) £22.00 Junior (under 16) £5.00 The Perfect Line? J.S. Davison 44 Details available from the Membership Secretary Unica Grayling Dave Southall 46 Mike Tebbs Telephone: 01985 841192 Cannibalism in Grayling Stanisław Cios 50 e-mail: [email protected] Book Review Bob Male 53 Design and Production Peter Silk Design e-mail: [email protected] Officers of The Society 54 Society Web Site Minutes of the 39th AGM 56 www.graylingsociety.net © The Grayling Society, 2015 Society Accounts 2015 58 Printed by The copyright of all material in this edition of ‘Grayling’ remains with the Authors, or the Grayling Society, and may not be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the copyright holders written permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Plums on the Prairies by Rick Sawatzky
    Plums on the Prairies by Rick Sawatzky Information from Literature Much has been published about pollination, pollinators, pollinizers, fertilization and fruit set in text books and periodicals. The definitions are not difficult. Pollination is the movement of pollen among compatible flowering plants (cross-pollination) or from anthers to stigmas on the same plant or different plants of the same clone (self-pollination). Many plants will self-pollinate but set very few fruit; some authors consider them self- pollinating but they are definitely not self-fruitful. Self-fruitful plants (and clones) set a crop of fruit after self-pollination; some of these plants bear fruit with no seeds (parthenocarpy); others develop seeds with embryos that are genetically identical to the parent plant (apomixis); and others produce haploid seeds that develop from an unfertilized egg cell. (When haploid seeds germinate they are very weak seedlings with only half the chromosomes of normal seedlings.) Regarding temperate zone tree fruits, self-pollination and fruit set does not mean self-fertility and the development of normal seeds. Many temperate zone small fruit species (e.g. strawberries and raspberries) are self-fertile and develop maximum yields of fruit with normal seeds as the result of self-pollination by insects. Pollinators, usually insects, are vectors of pollen movement. Pollinizers are plants which provide the appropriate pollen for other plants. Fertilization is the process in which gametes from the pollen unite with egg cells in the ovary of the flower. Normal seeds are usually the result of this process. Also, the principles are easily understood. Poor fertilization in plums and other Prunus species results in a poor fruit set.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Fen Communitynorthern Abstract Fen, Page 1
    Northern Fen CommunityNorthern Abstract Fen, Page 1 Community Range Prevalent or likely prevalent Infrequent or likely infrequent Absent or likely absent Photo by Joshua G. Cohen Overview: Northern fen is a sedge- and rush-dominated 8,000 years. Expansion of peatlands likely occurred wetland occurring on neutral to moderately alkaline following climatic cooling, approximately 5,000 years saturated peat and/or marl influenced by groundwater ago (Heinselman 1970, Boelter and Verry 1977, Riley rich in calcium and magnesium carbonates. The 1989). community occurs north of the climatic tension zone and is found primarily where calcareous bedrock Several other natural peatland communities also underlies a thin mantle of glacial drift on flat areas or occur in Michigan and can be distinguished from shallow depressions of glacial outwash and glacial minerotrophic (nutrient-rich) northern fens, based on lakeplains and also in kettle depressions on pitted comparisons of nutrient levels, flora, canopy closure, outwash and moraines. distribution, landscape context, and groundwater influence (Kost et al. 2007). Northern fen is dominated Global and State Rank: G3G5/S3 by sedges, rushes, and grasses (Mitsch and Gosselink 2000). Additional open wetlands occurring on organic Range: Northern fen is a peatland type of glaciated soils include coastal fen, poor fen, prairie fen, bog, landscapes of the northern Great Lakes region, ranging intermittent wetland, and northern wet meadow. Bogs, from Michigan west to Minnesota and northward peat-covered wetlands raised above the surrounding into central Canada (Ontario, Manitoba, and Quebec) groundwater by an accumulation of peat, receive inputs (Gignac et al. 2000, Faber-Langendoen 2001, Amon of nutrients and water primarily from precipitation et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Illinois Native Trees
    Technical Forestry Bulletin · NRES-102 Checklist of Illinois Native Trees Jay C. Hayek, Extension Forestry Specialist Department of Natural Resources & Environmental Sciences Updated May 2019 This Technical Forestry Bulletin serves as a checklist of Tree species prevalence (Table 2), or commonness, and Illinois native trees, both angiosperms (hardwoods) and gym- county distribution generally follows Iverson et al. (1989) and nosperms (conifers). Nearly every species listed in the fol- Mohlenbrock (2002). Additional sources of data with respect lowing tables† attains tree-sized stature, which is generally to species prevalence and county distribution include Mohlen- defined as having a(i) single stem with a trunk diameter brock and Ladd (1978), INHS (2011), and USDA’s The Plant Da- greater than or equal to 3 inches, measured at 4.5 feet above tabase (2012). ground level, (ii) well-defined crown of foliage, and(iii) total vertical height greater than or equal to 13 feet (Little 1979). Table 2. Species prevalence (Source: Iverson et al. 1989). Based on currently accepted nomenclature and excluding most minor varieties and all nothospecies, or hybrids, there Common — widely distributed with high abundance. are approximately 184± known native trees and tree-sized Occasional — common in localized patches. shrubs found in Illinois (Table 1). Uncommon — localized distribution or sparse. Rare — rarely found and sparse. Nomenclature used throughout this bulletin follows the Integrated Taxonomic Information System —the ITIS data- Basic highlights of this tree checklist include the listing of 29 base utilizes real-time access to the most current and accept- native hawthorns (Crataegus), 21 native oaks (Quercus), 11 ed taxonomy based on scientific consensus.
    [Show full text]
  • FULL ACCOUNT FOR: Urochloa Maxima Global Invasive Species Database (GISD) 2021. Species Profile Urochloa Maxima. Available From
    FULL ACCOUNT FOR: Urochloa maxima Urochloa maxima System: Terrestrial Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Plantae Magnoliophyta Liliopsida Cyperales Poaceae Common name buffalograss (English), green panic (English), tinikarati (English, Cook Islands), capime guiné (French), panic élevé (French), zacate Guinea (English), vao Kini (English, Samoa), vao Kini (English, American Samoa), talapi (English, Cook Islands), Guinea grass (English), fataque (French), saafa (English, Tonga), yerba de Guinea (English), herbe de Guinéa (French) Synonym Panicum maximum , Jacq. Panicum gongylodes , Jacq. Panicum hirsutissimum , Steud. Panicum jumentorum , Pers. Panicum laeve , Lam. Panicum maximum , var. coloratum C.T. White Panicum maximum , var. maximum Panicum maximum , var. pubiglume K. Schum. Panicum maximum , var. trichoglume Robyns Panicum polygamum , var. gongylodes (Jacq.) E. Fourn. Panicum trichocondylum , Steud. Urochloa maxima , var. trichoglumis (Robyns) R.D. Webster Panicum maximum , var. gongylodes (Jacq.) Döll Similar species Summary Although Urochloa maxima is the accepted name for this species, it is still widely known as Panicum maximum. Urochloa maxima is a native of tropical Africa where it occurs from sea level to 1,800m. It is used as a forage grass and its ability to tolerate a wide range of habitats make it a very productive species. Urochloa maxima has become prevalent in Samoa and Tonga and it is a problem species in Guam and Hawaii. Although it is a favourable grass in many areas it can also form dense stands and displace native
    [Show full text]
  • Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations
    Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations Revised Report and Documentation Prepared for: Department of Defense U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Submitted by: January 2004 Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations: Revised Report and Documentation CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary..........................................................................................iii 2.0 Introduction – Project Description................................................................. 1 3.0 Methods ................................................................................................................ 3 3.1 NatureServe Data................................................................................................ 3 3.2 DOD Installations............................................................................................... 5 3.3 Species at Risk .................................................................................................... 6 4.0 Results................................................................................................................... 8 4.1 Nationwide Assessment of Species at Risk on DOD Installations..................... 8 4.2 Assessment of Species at Risk by Military Service.......................................... 13 4.3 Assessment of Species at Risk on Installations ................................................ 15 5.0 Conclusion and Management Recommendations.................................... 22 6.0 Future Directions.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]