DOCSLIB.ORG

Prehistoric Society

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Prehistoric Society UHI Research Database pdf download summary Colour, Cups and Tiles Card, Nick Published in: Past Publication date: 2010 The Document Version you have downloaded here is: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to author version on UHI Research Database Citation for published version (APA): Card, N. (2010). Colour, Cups and Tiles: Recent Discoveries at the Ness of Brodgar. Past, 66, 1-3. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the UHI Research Database are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights: 1) Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the UHI Research Database for the purpose of private study or research. 2) You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain 3) You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the UHI Research Database Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us at [email protected] providing details; we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 06. Oct. 2021 4154_PAST 66_Amended:PAST 55 9/11/10 13:04 Page 3 AST NUMBER 66 November 2010 THE NEWSLETTER OF THE PREHISTORIC SOCIETY Registered Office University College London, Institute of Archaeology, 31–34 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PY http://www.prehistoricsociety.org/ PCOLOUR, CUPS AND TILES - RECENT DISCOVERIES AT THE NESS OF BRODGAR At the epicentre of Neolithic Orkney lies the Ness of Stenness. The site challenges the way this remarkable Brodgar in the midst of some of the most iconic landscape is perceived, much as the discoveries at prehistoric monuments of western Europe - nearby Barnhouse did two decades ago. Maeshowe, the Ring of Brodgar and the Stones of 6 6 An overall view of the main trench The copy date for PAST 67 is 1 March 2011. Contributions to Joanna Brück, School of Archaeology, Newman Building, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. Email: [email protected] Contributions on disc or as e-mail attachments are preferred (either word 6 or rtf files) but hardcopy is also accepted. Illustrations can be sent as drawings, slides, prints, tif or jpeg files. The book reviews editor is Dr Mike Allen, Wessex Archaeology, Portway House, Old Sarum Park, Salisbury, Wilts, SP4 6EB. Email: [email protected] Queries over subscriptions and membership should go to the Society administrator Tessa Machling at the London address above. PAST 1 4154_PAST 66_Amended:PAST 55 9/11/10 13:04 Page 4 Until recently, this large whaleback ridge ( c. 250 x layer of colour, the contrast between the design and 100m) was considered to be a natural feature. the parent rock would have been dramatically However, excavation has revealed that much of the enhanced. Apparent multi-layered engravings could mound is artificial and comprises several phases of also be clarified if each set of engravings was Neolithic activity. During its later phases, the site was ‘separated’ by a layer of paint. dominated by a group of large stone buildings that were contained within a massive walled enclosure (c.125 x 75m). The evidence to date would suggest that the complex was primarily non-domestic and was an integral part of this rich ritual landscape. This season, earlier phases of the site were identified with several oval structures starting to appear under, and in some cases partially incorporated into, the later phases already revealed. These may not be the earliest on site as the potential depth of archaeology points towards earlier activity below. However, all of the phases recognised so far seem to date to the Late Neolithic as indicated by a rich material assemblage dominated by Grooved Ware exhibiting both applied and incised decoration. The ‘tile horizon’ within one of the side recesses of Structure 8 Prior to this season, the main structures were already In addition to the three major structures (Structures impressive with regards to their scale, symmetrical 1, 8 and 10) revealed previously (with several more architecture, art (with over 100 stones exhibiting indicated by geophysics), in 2010 the newly revealed both finely incised geometric designs and pecked Structure 12 also proved to be of the same motifs), and walls surviving to in excess of 1m in monumental nature. In excess of 16 metres long and height. In 2010, their unusual nature was further 10 metres wide, Structure 12 exhibited the same emphasised by the discovery of evidence for tiled angular and symmetrical architecture as Structures 1 roofs and painted walls. and 8 at the Ness and Structure 2 at Barnhouse. In all these buildings, stone piers were employed to In two of the structures where floor deposits have create recesses along their inner wall faces. Structure been partially uncovered, a horizon of numerous 2 at Barnhouse was interpreted as being non- thin stone slabs was encountered just above the domestic and for the preparation of special food and occupation layers. These slabs had been trimmed the manufacture of unusual items such as into rectangular shapes just as can be seen today on maceheads. This season at the Ness, the some traditional stone-slated Orcadian roofs. In extraordinary array of finds from the two recesses essence, these layers of slabs represent collapsed so far excavated in Structure 8 - a large whale slated roofs. The regular nature of such a roofing tooth, several polished stone items, a whalebone system would be in stark contrast to that normally macehead and a polished shale object - may indicate envisaged, but would seem to complement their a similar function. regular architecture. However, at the Ness, Structures 1, 8 and 12 would Although the use of colour was already evident in appear to be contemporary as indicated by their the central chamber of Structure 10, with naturally spatial respect for each other, similarities in coloured red and yellow sandstone incorporated in architecture (including identical dimensions between its build, this was complemented by the discovery of sets of piers) and their north/south alignment, several stones that had been ‘painted’ within two of although this is not yet proven stratigraphically. Did the other structures. Vivid earthy colours of reds, these similarities also reflect a similar function for browns and yellows were encountered that initial these three buildings? One possible interpretation is analyses indicate were derived from ochre or iron suggested by Colin Richards whose recent research ores. Although some stone faces appear to have been at the two nearby stone circles indicates that they completely covered in pigment, others showed were composed of different types of sandstone from evidence of designs paralleled by some of the incised various locations across Orkney. He sees this as art. ‘Paint pots’ had been previously discovered at evidence that the standing stones represented input Skara Brae but these were presumed to have been by different groups or communities from across the used for personal adornment. This use of colour may archipelago contributing to the circle construction. help to explain the many very lightly incised and Could the Ness of Brodgar be interpreted in a similar ephemeral designs discovered at the Ness and way as a place where different groups, probably of elsewhere. If these designs were incised through a related kin, constructed discrete but similar, special 2 PAST 4154_PAST 66_Amended:PAST 55 9/11/10 13:05 Page 5 ‘family’ buildings? This multi-community-based hearth, Structure 10 seems to represent a ‘house’ on theory could help to explain the wide range of a grand scale. Other aspects and its associations with decorative styles we see on the prolific Grooved Maeshowe (alignment, use of standing stones and its Ware assemblage at the Ness. cruciform chamber) would point towards a more special or spiritual use. Excavation of the floor The final major phase at the Ness is represented by deposits next year should elucidate this. Structure 10. This shows a marked departure from earlier phases in terms of its scale (at over 20 x 19m Forming the southern side of the enclosing wall in size, with walls over 5m thick); complexity (the around these structures is the ‘Lesser Wall of incorporation of standing stones, the presence of a Brodgar’ (only 2m wide as compared to the 4m plus surrounding paved passage and its alignment with wide ‘Greater Wall of Brodgar’ that forms its Maes Howe); design (a cruciform shaped central northern boundary). In 2010, its full surviving height chamber); and art. of over 1.7m was revealed, along with a sequence of paving around its exterior. The beautifully built This season, excavation concentrated on revealing outer wall face gave a sense of what must have been the floor deposits and the refinement of the central an awe inspiring sight as one approached the Ness chamber of this building. The stone ‘dresser’/altar (?) from the Stones of Stenness 5,000 years ago. was shown to be freestanding and elaborated with pecked surface dressing to complement the use of naturally coloured sandstones. Central to the chamber, a large square stone hearth was revealed. A multi-cupped stone had been placed in the middle of the hearth along with an upturned cattle skull to perhaps commemorate its last use. It is tempting to relate these deposits within the chamber to the massive bone layer that fills the upper levels of the paved passage surrounding Structure 10. Preliminary assessment of this bone by Dr Ingrid Mainland has shown that it is predominantly cattle tibia representing perhaps hundreds of individual cattle - remnants of a final ‘decommissioning’ feast? The ‘Lesser Wall of Brodgar’ revealed to its full surviving height Once again, the discoveries in 2010 at the Ness would seem to emphasise the special nature of the site - not only the buildings, the art and the enclosing walls, but also the wide range of finds including some that indicate widespread contacts such as flint from Yorkshire and pitchstone from Arran.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Wisbech Standard 26/06/11 Fenland District Archaeological
    The Wisbech Standard 26/06/11 Fenland District Archaeological Planning - A Response to Councillor Melton We the undersigned consider to be shocking and potentially disastrous the recent declaration by Councillor Alan Melton (reported in the Cambs Times and Wisbech Standard) that, as of July 1st, the Fenland District Council will no longer apply archaeological planning condition. His speech to the Fenland Council Building and Design Awards ceremony at Wisbech noted the safeguarding of natural and aesthetic concerns, but made no mention of heritage aside from: “in local known historical areas, such as next to a 1000 year old church…. Common sense will prevail! The bunny huggers won't like this, but if they wish to inspect a site, they can do it when the footings are being dug out”. If Fenland District Council proceed with these plans, not only will it find itself contravening national planning guidelines and existing cultural and heritage statute and case law, it is likely any development will be open to legal challenges that will involve the Council (and by extension its rate-payers) in major financial costs and cause prospective developers serious delays, if not worse. All these factors run counter to Councillor Melton’s arguments and he will place Fenland District Council at a considerable financial risk. Rather than, as claimed, being an impediment to local development, development-related archaeology is a highly professional field and the vast majority of such excavations within England occur without any delay or redesign consequences to subsequent building programmes. Indeed, not only is archaeological fieldwork a source of graduate employment, but also now significantly contributes to the local rural economy (plant hire, tourism etc.).
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 CAG Library Index
    Ref Book Name Author B020 (Shire) ANCIENT AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENTS Sian Rees B015 (Shire) ANCIENT BOATS Sean McGrail B017 (Shire) ANCIENT FARMING Peter J.Reynolds B009 (Shire) ANGLO-SAXON POTTERY D.H.Kenneth B198 (Shire) ANGLO-SAXON SCULPTURE James Lang B011 (Shire) ANIMAL REMAINS IN ARCHAEOLOGY Rosemary Margaret Luff B010 (Shire) ARCHAEOLOGY OF GARDENS Christopher Taylor B268 (Shire) ARCHAEOLOGY OF GARDENS Christopher Taylor B039 (Shire) ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE ENGLISH CIVIL WAR Peter Harrington B276 (Shire) ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE ENGLISH CIVIL WAR Peter Harrington B240 (Shire) AVIATION ARCHAEOLOGY IN BRITAIN Guy de la Bedoyere B014 (Shire) BARROWS IN ENGLAND AND WALES L.V.Grinsell B250 (Shire) BELLFOUNDING Trevor S Jennings B030 (Shire) BOUDICAN REVOLT AGAINST ROME Paul R. Sealey B214 (Shire) BREWING AND BREWERIES Maurice Lovett B003 (Shire) BRICKS & BRICKMAKING M.Hammond B241 (Shire) BROCHS OF SCOTLAND J.N.G. Ritchie B026 (Shire) BRONZE AGE COPPER MINING William O'Brian B245 (Shire) BRONZE AGE COPPER MINING IN BRITAIN AND William O'Brien B230 (Shire) CAVE ART Andrew J. Lawson B035 (Shire) CELTIC COINAGE Philip de Jersey B032 (Shire) CELTIC CROSSES OF BRITAIN AND IRELAND Malcolm Seaborne B205 (Shire) CELTIC WARRIORS W.F. & J.N.G.Ritchie B006 (Shire) CHURCH FONTS Norman Pounds B243 (Shire) CHURCH MEMORIAL BRASSES AND BRASS Leigh Chapman B024 (Shire) CLAY AND COB BUILDINGS John McCann B002 (Shire) CLAY TOBACCO PIPES E.G.Agto B257 (Shire) COMPUTER ARCHAEOLOGY Gary Lock and John Wilcock B007 (Shire) DECORATIVE LEADWORK P.M.Sutton-Goold B029 (Shire) DESERTED VILLAGES Trevor Rowley and John Wood B238 (Shire) DESERTED VILLAGES Trevor Rowley and John Wood B270 (Shire) DRY STONE WALLS Lawrence Garner B018 (Shire) EARLY MEDIEVAL TOWNS IN BRITAIN Jeremy Haslam B244 (Shire) EGYPTIAN PYRAMIDS AND MASTABA TOMBS Philip Watson B027 (Shire) FENGATE Francis Pryor B204 (Shire) GODS OF ROMAN BRITAIN Miranda J.
    [Show full text]
  • Stonehenge Bibliography
    Bibliography Abbot, M. and Anderson-Whymark, H., 2012. Anon., 2011a, Discoveries provide evidence of Stonehenge Laser Scan: archaeological celestial procession at Stonehenge. On-line analysis report. English Heritage project source available at: 6457. English Heritage Research Report http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/news/latest/ Series no. 32-2012, available at: 2011/11/25Nov-Discoveries-provide- http://services.english- evidence-of-a-celestial-procession-at- herita ge.org.uk/Resea rch Repo rtsPdf s/032_ Stonehenge.aspx (accessed 2 April 2012). 2012WEB.pdf Anon., 2011b, Stonehenge’s sister? Current Alexander, C., 2009, If the stones could speak: Archaeology, 260, 6–7. Searching for the meaning of Stonehenge. Anon., 2011c, Home is where the heath is. National Geographic, 213.6 (June 2008), Late Neolithic house, Durrington Walls. 34–59. Current Archaeology, 256, 42–3. Allen, S., 2008, The quest for the earliest Anon., 2011d, Stonehenge rocks. Current published image of Stonehinge (sic). Archaeology, 254, 6–7. Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural Anon., 2012a, Origin of some of the Bluestone History Magazine, 101, 257–9. debris at Stonehenge. British Archaeology, Anon., 2006, Excavation and Fieldwork in 123, 9. Wiltshire 2004. Wiltshire Archaeological Anon., 2012b, Stonehenge: sourcing the and Natural History Magazine, 99, 264–70. Bluestones. Current Archaeology, 263, 6– Anon., 2007a, Excavation and Fieldwork in 7. Wiltshire 2005. Wiltshire Archaeological Aronson, M., 2010, If stones could speak. and Natural History Magazine, 100, 232– Unlocking the secrets of Stonehenge. 39. Washington DC: National Geographic. Anon., 2007b, Before Stonehenge: village of Avebury Archaeological and Historical wild parties. Current Archaeology, 208, Research Group (AAHRG) 2001 17–21.
    [Show full text]
  • Pearson, M. P. & Al.: Stonehenge for the Ancestors, 1
    PEARSON, M. P. & AL.: STONEHENGE FOR THE ANCESTORS, 1: LANDSCAPE AND MONUMENTS 1. Introduction The Stonehenge Riverside Project Background to the project Implications of the hypothesis Research aims M. Parker Pearson, J. Pollard, C. Richards, J. Thomas C. Tilley, K. Welham and P. Marshall 2. Fourth millennium BC beginnings: monuments in the landscape The landscape of the fourth millennium BC – (C. Tilley, W. Bennett and D. Field) Geophysical surveys of the Greater Cursus and Amesbury 42 long barrow – (K. Welham, C. Steele, L. Martin and A. Payne) 3. Fourth millennium BC beginnings: excavations of the Greater Cursus, Amesbury 42 long barrow and a tree-throw pit at Woodhenge The Greater Stonehenge Cursus – (J. Thomas) Amesbury 42 long barrow – (J. Thomas) Investigations of the buried soil beneath the mound of Amesbury 42 – (M.J. Allen) Stonehenge Lesser Cursus, Stonehenge Greater Cursus and the Amesbury 42 long barrow: radiocarbon dating – (P. D. Marshall, C. Bronk Ramsey and G. Cook) Antler artefact from the Greater Cursus and Amesbury 42 long barrow – (G. Davies) Pottery from the Greater Cursus and Amesbury 42 long barrow – (R. Cleal) Chalk artefact from the Greater Cursus – (A. Teather) Lithics from stratified contexts of the Greater Cursus – (B. Chan) Lithics from the ploughsoil of the Greater Cursus – (D. Mitcham) Lithics from stratified contexts of Amesbury 42 long barrow – (B. Chan) Human remains from Amesbury 42 long barrow and the Greater Cursus – (A. Chamberlain and C. Willis) Charred plant remains and wood charcoal from the Greater Cursus and Amesbury 42 long barrow – (E. Simmons) Woodhenge tree-throw pit – (J. Pollard) Pottery from the Woodhenge tree-throw pit – (Rosamund M.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Aqy Volume 82 Issue 316 Cov
    oo (N Antiquity is an international peer-reviewed journal of archaeological research that aims to communicate the most significant new discoveries, theory, method and cultural resource issues rapidly and in plain language to practicing archaeologists everywhere. The Antiquity website provides access to all the articles published in Antiquity since 1927, together with the Project Gallery, a free access addition to the journal providing news on ongoing projects from around the world. Find us at http://antiquity.ac.uk. Antiquity was founded in 1927 by O.G.S. Crawford and is owned by the Antiquity Trust, a registered charity. The Trustees of the Antiquity Trust are Warwick Bray, John Coles, Barry Cunliffe, Anthony Harding, Paul Mellars, Colin Renfrew, Stephen Shennan and Graeme Barker. The Directors of Antiquity Publications Ltd., owned by the Antiquity Trust and responsible for producing Antiquity, are Chris Evans, Joan Oates, Andrew Rogerson, Richard Skaer, Anthony Snodgrass, Martin Millett and Roger Guthrie. Antiquity is edited at the Department of Archaeology, University of York, UK (Head: Julian Richards). Antiquity is published quarterly in March, June, September and December. Editor: Correspondents Martin Carver Sarah Allan [email protected], Dartmouth University, USA (China) Editorial Assistant: Irina Arzhenseva [email protected], Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia (Russia) Jo Tozer Paul Bahn [email protected] (Europe) Reviews Editor: Xingcan Chen [email protected], Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Madeleine Hummler
    [Show full text]
  • Stonehenge's Avenue and Bluestonehenge
    Stonehenge’s Avenue and Bluestonehenge Michael J. Allen1, Ben Chan2, Ros Cleal3, Charles French4, Peter Marshall5, Joshua Pollard6, Rebecca Pullen7, Colin Richards8, Clive Ruggles9, David Robinson10, Jim Rylatt11, Julian Thomas8, Kate Welham12 & Mike Parker Pearson13,* Stonehenge has long been known to form part of a larger prehistoric landscape (Figure 1). In particular, it is part of a composite monument that includes the Stonehenge Avenue, first mapped in 1719–1723 by William Stukeley (1740) who recorded that it ran from Stonehenge’s northeast entrance for over a kilometre towards the River Avon, bending southeast and crossing King Barrow Ridge before disappearing under ploughed ground. He also noted that its initial 500m-long stretch from Stonehenge was aligned towards the midsummer solstice sunrise. Archaeological excavations during the 20th century revealed that the Avenue consists of two parallel banks with external, V-profile ditches, about 22m apart. The dating, phasing and extent of the Avenue, however, remained uncertain. Its length could be traced no closer than 200m from the River Avon (Smith 1973), and the question of whether the Avenue’s construction constituted a single event had not been entirely resolved (Cleal et al. 1995: 327). Our investigations were part of a re-evaluation of Stonehenge and its relationship to the River Avon in 2008–2009, involving the re-opening and extension of trenches previously dug across the Avenue during the 20th century and digging new trenches at West Amesbury beyond the then-known limit of the Avenue. The result of this work was the discovery of a new henge at West Amesbury, situated at the hitherto undiscovered east end of the Avenue beside the River Avon.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology: the Key Concepts Is the Ideal Reference Guide for Students, Teachers and Anyone with an Interest in Archaeology
    ARCHAEOLOGY: THE KEY CONCEPTS This invaluable resource provides an up-to-date and comprehensive survey of key ideas in archaeology and their impact on archaeological thinking and method. Featuring over fifty detailed entries by international experts, the book offers definitions of key terms, explaining their origin and development. Entries also feature guides to further reading and extensive cross-referencing. Subjects covered include: ● Thinking about landscape ● Cultural evolution ● Social archaeology ● Gender archaeology ● Experimental archaeology ● Archaeology of cult and religion ● Concepts of time ● The Antiquity of Man ● Feminist archaeology ● Multiregional evolution Archaeology: The Key Concepts is the ideal reference guide for students, teachers and anyone with an interest in archaeology. Colin Renfrew is Emeritus Disney Professor of Archaeology and Fellow of the McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge. Paul Bahn is a freelance writer, translator and broadcaster on archaeology. YOU MAY ALSO BE INTERESTED IN THE FOLLOWING ROUTLEDGE STUDENT REFERENCE TITLES: Archaeology: The Basics Clive Gamble Ancient History: Key Themes and Approaches Neville Morley Who’s Who in Ancient Egypt Michael Rice Who’s Who in the Ancient Near East Gwendolyn Leick Who’s Who in the Greek World John Hazel Who’s Who in the Roman World John Hazel ARCHAEOLOGY The Key Concepts Edited by Colin Renfrew and Paul Bahn LONDON AND NEW YORK First published 2005 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX 14 4RN Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 270 Madison Ave., New York, NY 10016 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Stonehenge for the Ancestors, Part the Monograph Is a Hefty 602 Pages, Packed 1: Landscape and Monuments
    Early View: Zitierfähige Online-Fassung mit vorläufiger Seitenzählung. Nach Erscheinen des gedruckten Bandes finden Sie den Beitrag mit den endgültigen Seitenzahlen im Open Access dort: http://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/arch-inf Den gedruckten Band erhalten Sie unter http://www.archaeologische-informationen.de. Early View: Quotable online version with preliminary pagination. After the printed volume has appeared you can find this article with its final pagination as open access publication there: http://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/archParker-inf Pearson,The printed volumeM. et al.will (eds) be available (2020). there: Stonehenge http://www.archaeologische-informationen.de for the Ancestors 1 . Review of: Parker Pearson, M., Pollard, J., Rich- mations buried near the Cuckoo Stone are given ards, C., Thomas, J., Tilley, C. & Welham, K. but no further details are provided. (eds) (2020). Stonehenge for the Ancestors, Part The monograph is a hefty 602 pages, packed 1: Landscape and Monuments. Leiden: Side- with in-depth specialist reports and thorough stone Press. 606 pp, 202 illustrations (b/w), 190 excavation descriptions. The publisher Sidestone illustrations (colour), hb/pb/online. ISBN 978-90- Press has used an innovative publishing model, 8890-702-9. https://www.sidestone.com/books/ with the book available at various prices: an ex- stonehenge-for-the-ancestors-part-1 pensive hardback, a less expensive paperback, a very modestly priced downloadable PDF, or a free Susan Greaney version to read online. This aim to provide free public access is admirable; the website informs This is the first of four volumes setting out in full that it has been read online 890 times since pub- the results of the Stonehenge Riverside Project lication in October 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Neolithic of Europe.Indb
    THE NEOLITHIC OF EUROPE PAPERS IN HONOUR OF ALASDAIR WHITTLE THE NEOLITHIC OF EUROPE PAPERS IN HONOUR OF ALASDAIR WHITTLE Edited by PENNY BICKLE, VICKI CUMMINGS, DANIELA HOFMANN AND JOSHUA POLLARD Oxford & Philadelphia Published in the United Kingdom in 2017 by OXBOW BOOKS The Old Music Hall, 106–108 Cowley Road, Oxford OX4 1JE and in the United States by OXBOW BOOKS 1950 Lawrence Road, Havertown, PA 19083 © Oxbow Books and the individual authors 2017 Hardcover Edition: ISBN 978-1-78570-654-7 Digital Edition: ISBN 978-1-78570-655-4 (epub) A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library and the Library of Congress All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the publisher in writing. Printed in Malta by Gutenberg Press Ltd Typeset in India by Lapiz Digital Services, Chennai For a complete list of Oxbow titles, please contact: UNITED KINGDOM Oxbow Books Telephone (01865) 241249, Fax (01865) 794449 Email: [email protected] www.oxbowbooks.com UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Oxbow Books Telephone (800) 791-9354, Fax (610) 853-9146 Email: [email protected] www.casemateacademic.com/oxbow Oxbow Books is part of the Casemate Group Front cover: Alleskoven dolmen, Denmark (Vicki Cummings). Back cover: La Table des Marchands, France (Vicki Cummings); a reconstructed LBK longhouse in the Paris basin (Penny Bickle); Carrowmore, Ireland (Vicki Cummings); an excavation in progress at the Herpaly tell, Hungary (Pál Raczky).
    [Show full text]
  • Book News 76 Prehistory
    Method and Theory 1 Albania: An Archaeological Guide New from Oxbow Books By Oliver Gilkes Oliver Gilkes has considerable experience excavating Experimental Archaeology and Theory: Recent in Butrint and carrying out research at other Approaches to Archaeological Hypotheses Albanian sites and this book is clearly a labour of Edited by Frederick love. After providing essential background to the Foulds country’s history he selects 50 of the most interesting Experimental Archaeology sites, from Neolithic settlements and Bronze Age aims to bridge the gap in burial sites, to Classical towns and villas, medieval archaeology between churches, Venetian fortifications, and Communist empirical testing and era defence works. Plans are provided for all sites, humanistic approaches to and detailed instructions are provided to enable you understanding the material find them, particularly those that are off the beaten record. The contributors track. 332p, b/w illus, col pls (Tauris & Co Ltd 2013) explore a wide variety of 9781780760698 Hb £49.50 different fields including Time’s Anvil: England, Archaeology and the how a phenomenological Imagination methodology can be used to By Richard Morris increase our understanding of how a Bronze Age Zig-zagging between prehistoric stone tools and temple was ‘experienced’ by people in the past; how Tudor theatre, primal wildwood and mass-produced experimentation in the production of materials such cars, Time’s Anvil weaves a series of interconnecting as rawhide, glass and wine-making can be used to studies of apparently unrelated things and periods test theories or written sources and the possibilities that are normally considered in isolation. In the of studying the three-dimensional morphology of process he re-examines aspects of England’s story Acheulian handaxes to search for possible from the end of the last glacial period to the present.
    [Show full text]
  • The Henge Monuments of Wessex
    Enclosing the Neolithic Recent studies in Britain and Europe Edited by Alex Gibson BAR International Series 2440 2012 Published by Archaeopress Publishers of British Archaeological Reports Gordon House 276 Banbury Road Oxford OX2 7ED England [email protected] www.archaeopress.com BAR S2440 Enclosing the Neolithic: Recent studies in Britain and Europe © Archaeopress and the individual authors 2012 ISBN 978 1 4073 1039 8 Printed in England by Information Press, Oxford All BAR titles are available from: Hadrian Books Ltd 122 Banbury Road Oxford OX2 7BP England www.hadrianbooks.co.uk The current BAR catalogue with details of all titles in print, prices and means of payment is available free from Hadrian Books or may be downloaded from www.archaeopress.com Living with Sacred Spaces: The Henge Monuments of Wessex Joshua Pollard Abstract By asking why henge monuments might be constructed in the first place, and in the locations where they were, we might better be able to understand their form and purpose. Here the matter is approached at two scales: first at a macro level by asking why the Wessex region should have become such a focus for monument construction during the first three quarters of the 3rd millennium BC. The second is more specific and seeks to understand the local conditions in which places might be transformed and become sufficiently sanctified to require monumentalisation. It is argued that places and their properties, powers and politics all played their part. Keywords: Wessex, henge, settlement, monumentalisation, sacredness The sheer concentration and often immense scale of the later Neolithic (c.3000-2400 BC) monuments of Wessex marks the prehistory of this region of southern Britain as something exceptional.
    [Show full text]
  • Fourth Millennium Bc Hilltop Sites in the Dorstone Area, Herefordshire
    AST NUMBER 70 April 2012 THE NEWSLETTER OF THE PREHISTORIC SOCIETY Registered Office University College London, Institute of Archaeology, 31–34 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PY http://www.prehistoricsociety.org/ 7 0 PFOURTH MILLENNIUM BC HILLTOP SITES IN THE DORSTONE AREA, HEREFORDSHIRE Three hilltop locations were the subject of exploratory investigations in July 2011 by an international team drawn from Manchester University, Kyushu University (led by Associate Professor Koji Mizoguchi), the University of Leipzig, Herefordshire county archaeological service and local volunteers. The aim of the field season was to confirm evidence for early Neolithic activity, and the possible construction of enclosures, at these prominent hilltops which stand in close proximity both to each other and to the Cotswold-Severn chambered tomb at Arthur’s Stone, Dorstone, and the putative long barrow at Cross Lodge, Dorstone. At the Knapp, Bredwardine, following up casual discoveries of worked flint in the 1970s, a series of trenches were excavated on the top and flanks of a steep-sided knoll overlooking the Wye floodplain east of Hay-on-Wye. They produced an assemblage that Dorstone Hill, looking south. In the foreground the quarried area included many more worked flints including a number produced only worked flints and Neolithic pottery. The bank beyond the quarry faces west, cutting off the neck of a broad of leaf-shaped arrowheads of strongly contrasting promontory facing the Black Mountains and overlooking the forms (with some evidence of production of some of Dore Valley to the south. The site is just over two kilometres these on-site), and sherds of plain bowl pottery from a to the south of the Knapp, and partially intervisible with it.
    [Show full text]