DOCSLIB.ORG

April, 2018 Eastern Churches News: Edited by Fr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
April, 2018 Eastern Churches News: Edited by Fr APRIL, 2018 EASTERN CHURCHES NEWS: EDITED BY FR. RON ROBERSON SEIA NEWSLETTER On the Eastern Churches and Ecumenism Number 271: April 30, 2018 Washington, DC The Holy Synod of the Ecumenical Patriarchate Considers Requests for Ukrainian Autocephaly PRESIDENT OF UKRAINE PETRO POROSHENKO ON TUESDAY, APRIL 17, ANNOUNCED THE START OF THE PROCEDURE FOR THE CREATION OF A UNIFIED UKRAINIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH. The relevant agreement was reached at 7-hour long negotiations between Poroshenko and Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew and Synod members held during a presidential visit to Turkey, Poroshenko said at a meeting with heads of parliamentary factions on Tuesday. "Ukraine is as close as ever to the emergence of its own Unified Orthodox Church," the president said, adding that he cannot elaborate on all details of the agreements reached. A number of elements are needed for the process to see success, including, a corresponding appeal from UOC of the Kyiv Patriarchate and Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church, which has already been signed to Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew in a rare united move of the two churches, according to Poroshenko. Poroshenko expressed hope that the new UOC would be created before the 1030th anniversary of baptism of the Kyiv Rus and called on Parliament to support the appeal to Constantinople. The president called the developments around a possible creation of a United Orthodox Church which would not be subordinate to Moscow a "historic event." The president ruled out the possibility of banning any other churches in Ukraine and noted that the state will remain separated from church. – Unian, April 17. TODAY, APRIL 19, UKRAINIAN PARLIAMENTARIANS UPHELD THE PETITION OF PETRO POROSHENKO TO THE ECUMENICAL PATRIARCH ASKING HIM TO GRANT THE TOMOS OF AUTOCEPHALY TO THE ORTHODOX CHURCH IN UKRAINE. About 268 MPs voted in favor. Before the vote, the President of Ukraine spoke to the audience. He said that the dialogue between the representatives of the state and the Patriarchate of Constantinople had lasted for several years and a favorable moment had come for the autocephaly of the UOC. “All Local Churches have been recognized through the engagement of state in this process. This is the requirement of Constantinople,” Poroshenko said. The President recalled that Orthodoxy came to Ukraine precisely from Constantinople and spread from us to Zalissia, where the Ukrainian princes recklessly founded Moscow. The head of state called on the church to tear the umbilical cord with Moscow. He also recalled that it was Russian church figures who invented the concept of the "Russian World," which the Kremlin later took on board. The President claims that the Churches have finally agreed to forget about old strife for the sake of association and recognition. Autocephaly is given not so much to a particular church but to a country, the President emphasized. That is why the Ukrainian state participates in this process. Not only religion but also geopolitics are involved here. This event is at the same level as the issue of a visa-free regime, and the signing of the Association Agreement. Separately, the Guarantor of the Constitution noted that this event would not violate the constitutional principle of separation of church and state. He also stressed that those who would like to remain part of the Moscow Patriarchate would reserve such a right. The heads of virtually all factions, Parliament Chairman Andriy Parubiy and the First Deputy Chairman of the Committee on Culture and Spirituality Iryna Podolyak support the President’s appeal to Patriarch Bartholomew. – RISU, April 19. ON 19 APRIL 2018, THE VERKHOVNA RADA OF UKRAINE ENDORSED AN INITIATIVE OF PRESIDENT PETRO POROSHENKO CONCERNING AN APPEAL TO THE PATRIARCH OF CONSTANTINOPLE FOR THE CREATION OF THE AUTOCEPHALOUS CHURCH IN UKRAINE. Interfax-Religion web portal asked Metropolitan Hilarion of Volokolamsk, chairman of the Moscow Patriarchate’s Department for External Church Relations, to present the position of the Russian Orthodox Church on this matter. – The creation of an autocephalous Church is a process that cannot be initiated by secular authorities, because, as is well-known, the Church in present-day states is separated from the state, and the state must not manipulate the Church, be it in an election campaign or for any other political purposes. The whole concept of the creation of one local Church in Ukraine, separated from the Russian Orthodox Church, is based on the idea that in an independent state there should be an independent Church. Had we decided to apply this principle, then the Church of Alexandria, for instance, should have been divided in over fifty parts, since it embraces all Africa, and Africa has more than fifty countries; the Church of Antioch should have been divided in several parts, just like the Church of Jerusalem, and so on. Only enemies of the Church benefit from such schemes and such ideas. The schism in Ukraine occurred because the former Metropolitan of Kiev, Philaret Denisenko, decided to solve his own, personal problem by means of church schism. The problem was that he had been one of the candidates for the Moscow Patriarchal Throne, but the Local Council of the Russian Orthodox Church had elected another man to this post – the late Patriarch Alexy II. Philaret Denisenko nursed a grievance and upon his return to Ukraine set about working towards the creation of an independent Church. Later, at the Bishops’ Council of the Russian Orthodox Church, he promised to resign from the post of Metropolitan of Kiev. However, returning to Ukraine, he changed his mind, announced another decision, thus breaking the promise given to the hierarchs of the Russian Church, and initiated the church schism. For almost a quarter of a century, this church schism has gathered pace due to the support by secular authorities. Yet, it is still a schism. As for the legitimization of schism, there haven’t been such precedents in the history of the Church. There were precedents when some hierarchs, clergymen, laypeople, groups and organizations returned from schism through repentance, and it is the only way that the Orthodox Church can offer. Certainly, we have recently heard of negotiations of the Ukrainian President Poroshenko with Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople. We have heard of the schismatics’ various initiatives, of trips to Phanar. We have heard of rich gifts brought there… We know all this, as well as many other things which I would not like to make public. At the same time, for many years we have heard a very firm position expressed by the Patriarch of Constantinople who has always said that he recognizes His Beatitude Metropolitan Onufry as the only head of the canonical Ukrainian Orthodox Church. And the Ukrainian Orthodox Church has no intention of severing relations with the Russian Orthodox Church. We are one Church born of the Kiev, Dnieper baptismal font, and, of course, neither Patriarchate of Constantinople, nor any other Church can unilaterally proclaim autocephaly of this or that Church. Therefore we believe that despite all the media fuss, this initiative will have the same fate as the initiatives of previous years, and we say again that the Ukrainian church problem can only be solved by canonical means. – Press Release, Moscow Patriarchate, April19. THE HOLY AND SACRED SYNOD, UNDER THE CHAIRMANSHIP OF HIS ALL- HOLINESS ECUMENICAL PATRIARCH BARTHOLOMEW, CONCLUDED ITS REGULAR SESSION, which took place between Thursday, April 19th, and Friday, April 20th. All the items on the agenda were reviewed and discussed and the appropriate decisions were made. In accordance with the Divine and Sacred Canons, as well as centuries-old ecclesiastical order and Holy Tradition, the Ecumenical Patriarchate concerns itself with the preservation of Pan-Orthodox unity and the care for the Orthodox Churches throughout the world—especially of the Ukrainian Orthodox Nation that has received the salvific Christian faith and holy baptism from Constantinople. Thus, as its true Mother Church, it examined matters pertaining to the ecclesiastical situation in Ukraine, as done in previous synodal sessions, and having received from ecclesiastical and civil authorities—representing millions of Ukrainian Orthodox Christians—a petition that requests the bestowal of autocephaly, decided to closely communicate and coordinate with its sister Orthodox Churches concerning this matter. -- At the Ecumenical Patriarchate, the 22nd of April, 2018. THE DEPARTMENT FOR EXTERNAL CHURCH RELATIONS OF THE UKRAINIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH OF THE MOSCOW PATRIARCHATE ISSUED THIS STATEMENT ON APRIL 22: On April 19, 2018, the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, by Resolution No. 8284, supported the appeal of the President of Ukraine P. O. Poroshenko to His All-Holiness Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I regarding the “granting of a Tomos of Autocephaly to the Orthodox Church in Ukraine.” In connection to this, and with the blessing of His Beatitude Metropolitan Onufriy of Kyiv and All Ukraine, the UOC Department for External Church Relations draws attention to the following. In accordance with Article 35 of the Constitution of Ukraine, the Church is separate from the state, and therefore the Church decides on issues of Church life independently. The Ukrainian Orthodox Church, which has canonical relations with Ecumenical Orthodoxy, did not appeal to Patriarch Bartholomew I to grant autocephaly to the Orthodox Church in Ukraine nor did it authorize the President or deputies of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine to do so. In connection to the above-mentioned initiatives, the government is overstepping its constitutional boundaries and interfering in Church affairs. Such actions by the Ukrainian state in the religious sphere could be justified only if the Church in Ukraine had a legally established state status, as it was in the history of many states and still remains in certain states of the world. However, since the Church in Ukraine today does not have government status and is separate from the state, then the state authorities have absolutely no grounds whatsoever to meddle in Church affairs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dopady Různosti Obřadů V Manželských Kauzách Na Církevním Soudu
    UNIVERZITA KARLOVA V PRAZE KATOLICKÁ TEOLOGICKÁ FAKULTA Miloš Szabo Dopady různosti obřadů v manželských kauzách na církevním soudu Disertační práce Vedoucí práce: prof. JUDr. Antonín Hrdina, DrSc. 2014 Prohlášení 1. Prohlašuji, že jsem předkládanou práci zpracoval samostatně a použil jen uvedené prameny a literaturu. 2. Prohlašuji, že práce nebyla využita k získání jiného titulu. 3. Souhlasím s tím, aby práce byla zpřístupněna pro studijní a výzkumné účely. V Praze dne 25. 11. 2014 2 Bibliografická citace Dopady různosti obřadů v manželských kauzách na církevním soudu [rukopis]: disertační práce / Miloš Szabo; vedoucí práce: Antonín Hrdina. – Praha, 2014. – 187 s. (+ 74 s. příloha) Anotace Křesťanství se z Jeruzaléma šířilo několika směry. Jedno z jeho nejvlivnějších center vzniklo v Římě, jenž se stal také sídlem papežů a zůstal jím i po přesídlení císaře do tehdy řecké Konstantinopole. Kromě Říma, spjatého s apoštolem Petrem však existovaly i další velké křesťanské obce, založené ostatními apoštoly, ležící na východ od římské říše, které se stejně jako ta římská nazývaly církví. A tak i dnes kromě největší latinské (římské) církve existují desítky východních, právem se chlubících vlastní apoštolskou tradicí. V průběhu dějin došlo několikrát k narušení jejich komunikace s Římem, ale i mezi sebou navzájem. V dnešní době, kdy z různých důvodů dochází k velkým migračním vlnám, se některá církevní společenství, doposud považována striktně za východní, dostávají do diaspory s latinskou církví, čímž vzniká nejen velká pravděpodobnost růstu počtu smíšených intereklesiálních manželství, ale zároveň také zvýšené množství manželských kauz, které bude muset následně řešit církevní soud. Aby jeho rozhodnutí bylo spravedlivé, je potřebné znát jak historii těchto východních církví, mezi nimiž je i dvacet dva sjednocených s Římem (tedy východní katolické církve), tak i především jejich teologická specifika, spiritualitu a partikulární právo.
    [Show full text]
  • Pope Francis Appoints Most Rev. Borys Gudziak As New Metropolitan- Archbishop of the Ukrainian Archeparchy of Philadelphia
    Pope Francis Appoints Most Rev. Borys Gudziak as new Metropolitan- Archbishop of the Ukrainian Archeparchy of Philadelphia On Monday, February 18th, 2019, the Vatican Information Service announced that the Holy Father has appointed Most Rev. Borys Gudziak as Archbishop of Philadelphia for Ukrainians and Metropolitan for the Ukrainian Catholic Church in USA and thus concurring with the recommendation of the appointment offered by the Synod of Ukrainian Catholic Bishops, which met in September of 2018 in Lviv, Ukraine. The Archeparchy of Philadelphia was declared by Pope Francis as “sede vacante” following the resignation of Most Rev. Stefan Soroka on April 16, 2018. Most Rev. Andriy Rabiy was named by Pope Francis as the Apostolic Administrator of the Ukrainian Catholic Archeparchy of Philadelphia until the appointment of the new Metropolitan- Archbishop. At the present time Most Rev. Borys Gudziak serves as the eparch of St. Volodymyr the Great Ukrainian Catholic Eparchy, which includes France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxemburg and Switzerland. He is the founder and president of the Ukrainian Catholic University in Lviv, Ukraine. In addition, Archbishop Borys is the head of Department of External Church Relations of the Ukrainian Catholic Church. Bishop Andriy Rabiy, Apostolic Administrator, Bishop John Bura, Auxiliary Bishop, clergy, monastic orders and faithful of the Archeparchy of Philadelphia wholeheartedly and joyfully welcome the news and invite everyone to the installation of Most Rev. Borys Gudziak as the seventh Metropolitan-Archbishop for the Ukrainian Catholic Archeparchy of Philadelphia, which will take place on Tuesday, June 4, 2019, at the Ukrainian Catholic Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception in Philadelphia, PA.
    [Show full text]
  • Sergei A. Mudrov
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE SERGEI A. MUDROV THE CONFRONTATION, INTIMIDATION AND NEW DIVISIONS? A CONTROVERSIAL PATH TO THE CREATION OF THE AUTOCEPHALOUS ORTHODOX CHURCH IN UKRAINE Sergei A. Mudrov Polotsk State University, Department of Social Communications, Belarus. Email: [email protected] Abstract: This article analyses the establishment of the autocephalous Orthodox Church in Ukraine. It explains the main steps that were taken in Ukraine towards obtaining auto- cephaly for the Orthodox Church, namely for two non-canonical groups — ‘Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church’ and ‘Ukrainian Orthodox Church -- Kiev Patriarchate’, which formally merged in December 2018. A special attention is devoted to the analysis of the events in 2018, starting from the April 2018 request of the Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, addressed to the Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomeos. I argue that the move towards autocephaly was dictated primarily by politico-ideological reasons and was accom- panied by the rise of confrontation and a lack of cooperation. The majority of Orthodox, belonging to the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (Moscow Patriarchate), opposed this process, which made them the subject of intimidation campaigns. It appears that in Ukraine there is an ongoing process of constructing a “radical other”, and much effort is being devoted to making the Ukrainian Orthodox Church this “radical other”, since the actions of this Church have been often interpreted in the most negative ways. Overall, the move towards autocephaly, instead of uniting Ukrainians, has brought about new dividing lines in Ukraine and has contributed to the split in global Orthodoxy. Key words: Orthodox Church; identity; religion; Ukraine; autocephaly; Ecumenical Patri- archate; Moscow Patriarchate.
    [Show full text]
  • Stabilisation of Movable Feasts
    [Communicated to the Council and the Members of the League.] Official N o.: C. 335. M. 154. 1934. VIII. Geneva. August 3rd, 1934. LEAGUE OF NATIONS ORGANISATION FOR COMMUNICATIONS AND TRANSIT STABILISATION OF MOVABLE FEASTS SUMMARY OF REPLIES FROM RELIGIOUS AUTHORITIES TO THE LETTER FROM THE SECRETARY-GENERAL OF THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS COMMUNICATING THE ACT REGARDING THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL ASPECTS OF FIXING MOVABLE FEASTS I. — COMMUNICATION OF THE ACT TO THE RELIGIOUS AUTHORITIES. According to the instructions of the Council, the Secretary-General brought the Act regarding the economic and social aspects of fixing movable feasts, adopted by the Fourth General Conference on Communications and Transit, to the notice of the Christian Religious Authorities, asking them to consider as favourably as possible what action they could “take in the matter. As far as the Holy See is concerned, the Act was communicated by letter from the Secretary-General of the League to the Secretary of State of His Holiness on November 16th, As regards Christian Churches other than the Roman Catholic Church, a request was addressed on November 16th, 1932, to the President of the Universal Christian Council for Life and Work, to which all these Churches are affiliated, asking him to bring the above-mentioned Act to their knowledge and to inform the Secretary-General of the League of the views expressed by the Churches in the matter. II. — RESULTS OF THE ENQUIRY. 1. — Attitude of the Holy See. By letter dated December 30th, 1932, Cardinal Pacelli informed the Secretary-General that the Holy bee maintains the point of view already expressed in previous communications — i.e., that the stabilisation of Easter is a pre-eminently religious question which falls within the competence of the Holy See and that, for reasons of higher spiritual concern, the Holy ?>ee cannot contemplate a change in this matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Vybrané Kresťanské Minority Súčasnej Alexandrie Jana Durcová
    Západočeská univerzita v Plzni Fakulta filozofická Bakalářská práce Vybrané kresťanské minority súčasnej Alexandrie Jana Durcová Plzeň 2020 Západočeská univerzita v Plzni Fakulta filozofická Katedra blízkovýchodních studií Studijní program Mezinárodní teritoriální studia Studijní obor Blízkovýchodní studia Bakalářská práce Vybrané kresťanské minority súčasnej Alexandrie Jana Durcová Vedoucí práce: Mgr. Věra Tydlitátová, Th.D. Katedra blízkovýchodních studií Fakulta filozofická Západočeské univerzity v Plzni Plzeň 2020 Vyhlasujem, že som prácu spracovala samostatne a použila len zdroje uvedené v zozname použitej literatúry a údaje, ktoré som získala počas svojich pobytov v Alexandrii v lete 2017 a na jar 2018. Plzeň, apríl 2020 .......................................... Obsah 1. ÚVOD ......................................................................................... 6 1.1 Ciele práce ..................................................................................... 7 1.2 Metodológia ................................................................................... 8 1.3 Terminológia a transkripcia ............................................................ 8 2. KRESŤANSTVO NA BLÍZKOM VÝCHODE .............................. 10 2.1 História a vývoj kresťanstva ......................................................... 10 2.2 Rozdelenie blízkovýchodných kresťanských cirkví ...................... 12 2.3 Kresťanstvo v období vzniku islamu a následnej expanzie, v stredoveku a v modernej dobe .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Holy See
    The Holy See GREETINGS OF JOHN PAUL II TO THE DELEGATIONS FROM THE OTHER CHURCHES AND ECCLESIAL COMMUNITIES Thursday, 25 January 2001 I am very pleased to have this moment of fellowship, which gives me the welcome opportunity once again to express my gratitude to each of you, venerable and dear Brothers, who wished to take part in today's celebration. Dear Brothers, I am pleased to spend this time of fellowship with you and to take the opportunity to thank you for your cordial presence at this celebration for the close of the Week of Prayer for Christian Unity. Our common prayer at the tomb of the Apostle Paul has been a source of great joy for me. I give thanks to the Lord for this moving sign of our commitment to Christian unity at the beginning of the third millennium. In a very special way, then, I wish to express my gratitude to each of you for your presence today. May Christ, "the way, and the truth, and the life", continue to guide and sustain us in fidelity to his will that all may be one. I am delighted that we have been given this time of fraternal fellowship, after having earlier brought our petitions to God in shared prayer. I would like to thank in particular: - the Delegation from the Ecumenical Patriarchate, representing His Holiness Bartholomew I, Ecumenical Patriarch; - the Delegation from the Greek Orthodox Patriarchate of Alexandria, representing His Beatitude Petros VII, Greek Orthodox Patriarch of Alexandria and All Africa; - the Delegation from the Greek Orthodox Patriarchate of Antioch, representing His Beatitude
    [Show full text]
  • The Holy See
    The Holy See ADDRESS OF THE HOLY FATHER POPE FRANCIS TO HIS HOLINESS POPE TAWADROS II, POPE OF ALEXANDRIA AND PATRIARCH OF THE SEE OF ST. MARK, HEAD OF THE COPTIC ORTHODOX CHURCH OF EGYPT Friday, 10 May 2013 Χριστός ανέστη Your Holiness, Dear Brothers in Christ, For me it is a great joy and a truly graced moment to be able to receive all of you here, at the tomb of Saint Peter, as we recall that historic meeting forty years ago between our predecessors, Pope Paul VI and the late Pope Shenouda III, in an embrace of peace and fraternity, after centuries in which there was a certain distance between us. So it is with deep affection that I welcome Your Holiness and the distinguished members of your delegation, and I thank you for your words. Through you, I extend my cordial greetings in the Lord to the bishops, the clergy, the monks and the whole Coptic Orthodox Church. Today’s visit strengthens the bonds of friendship and brotherhood that already exist between the See of Peter and the See of Mark, heir to an inestimable heritage of martyrs, theologians, holy monks and faithful disciples of Christ, who have borne witness to the Gospel from generation to generation, often in situations of great adversity. Forty years ago the Common Declaration of our predecessors represented a milestone on the ecumenical journey, and from it emerged a Commission for Theological Dialogue between our Churches, which has yielded good results and has prepared the ground for a broader dialogue between the Catholic Church and the entire family of Oriental Orthodox Churches, a dialogue that continues to bear fruit to this day.
    [Show full text]
  • Pope Francis
    Weekday Homilies of Pope Francis December 1 to 15, 2013 ….at the Chapel of Casa di Santa Martha at 7 a.m. Christmas is an encounter, not just a memory “Preparing for Christmas through prayer, charity and exhaltation”. With this hope, Pope Francis called on the faithful Monday, December 2, to open their hearts and allow themselves to encounter the Lord who renews all. In his homily, Pope Francis recalled that as “we proceed towards Christmas, we embark on a journey of faith and prayer in preparation for our encounter with the Lord, because, Christmas isn’t just a temporal celebration or the memory of a beautiful (event).” "Christmas is an encounter! It's a journey to encounter Him, to find Him through our hearts and our lives, to find the living God and to find Him through faith. It's not easy to live with faith. In today's Gospel, the Lord marvelled at the centurion. He marvelled at his faith. The centurion made a journey to meet the Lord, but he made it in faith. He not only encountered the Lord, but he came to know the joy of being encountered by him. And this is precisely the sort of encounter we desire, the encounter of faith. To encounter the Lord, but also to allow ourselves to be encountered by him. This is very important”. And to actually have an encounter with Jesus, one must pray more, increase charity and treat others with love and joy. “Christmas is something more, Christmas is an encounter with the Lord. And as we make our way towards Him, we must go with open heart and faith, even though this is not always easy.
    [Show full text]
  • Bishop Andriy Rabiy Presided at the Cathedral Liturgies in Philadelphia
    Official Publication of the Ukrainian Catholic Archeparchy of Philadelphia VOL. 79 - No. 21 NOVEMBER 18, 2018 ENGLISH VERSION Bishop Andriy Rabiy presided at the Cathedral Liturgies in Philadelphia, PA, on Sunday, November 4, 2018 to Commemorate the Sixtieth Anniversary of the Establishment of the Ukrainian Catholic Metropolitan Archeparchy of Philadelphia. Archeparchy News pg. 2-21 Holidays/Feast Day pg. 27 Children’s Corner pg. 22-23 Advertisements pg. 28-32 Catechism pg. 24-26 Church News pg. 33-42 Archeparchy News Bishop Andriy Rabiy presided at the Cathedral Liturgies in Philadelphia, PA, on Sunday, November 4, 2018 to Commemorate the Sixtieth Anniversary of the Establishment of the Ukrainian Catholic Metropolitan Archeparchy of Philadelphia. (continued from previous page) Sixty years ago, on Saturday, November 1, 1958 thousands of faithful gathered at the Convention Hall in Philadelphia for a Pontifical Divine Liturgy by His Excellency, Constantine Bohachevsky, celebrating his installation as the first Metropolitan Archbishop and the canonical elevation of the Exarchy of Philadelphia to a Metropolitan- Archeparchy by His Holiness Pope Pius XII. Bishop Rabiy spoke about the history of the Ukrainian church in America during the Homily at both the 9 and 10:30 am Liturgies. At the conclusion of the 10:30 am Divine Liturgy, a Panachyda was offered on the 74th Anniversary of the Venerable Servant of God Metropolitan Andriy Sheptytsky’s death on November 1, 1944. Watch a video on our YouTube Channel at https://www. youtube.com/user/ thewayukrainian/ videos NOVEMBER 18, 2018 2 Archeparchy News 12,000 Faithful Witness Historical Installation Rites November 1, 1958 History was once again recorded in Philadelphia, but this time on November 1, 1958.
    [Show full text]
  • Between Forgiveness and Indulgence: Funerary Prayers of Absolution in Russia
    BETWEEN FORGIVENESS AND INDULGENCE: FUNERARY PRAYERS OF ABSOLUTION IN RUSSIA Nikolaos Chrissidis The custom o f placing a written prayer of absolution in the hands o f the deceased right before burial is attested in Russia since medieval times. The text of the prayer varied even after the appearance o f printed litur­ gical books. The essay analyzes the text o f the prayer as it crystallized by the 19th century (and is in use to this day) and compares it to Eastern Orthodox synchorochartia (patriarchal letters of absolution). The conclu­ sion is that since the late 19th century (if not before) Russians have been When Tsar Fedor Alekseevich died on 27 April 1682, the funeral rites were conducted by Patriarch loakim (in office 1674-1690) with all the customary pomp and circumstance befitting the exalted deceased. Towards the end of the burial rite, and just before the interment o f the body in the Archangel Michael Cathedral of the Moscow Kremlin, Patriarch loakim deposited a prayer of absolution (molitvu proshcheniia) into the hands of the departed. Shortly thereafter the body was carried to its final resting place.1 loakim’s last action reflected an ancient Russian custom, which gave the 1 “O prestavlenii i pogrebenii Gosudaria Tsaria i Velikogo Kniazia Feodora Alekseevicha,” 211-212. Tapestry of Russian Christianity: Studies in History and Culture. Nickolas Lupinin, Donald Ostrowski and Jennifer B. Spock, eds. Columbus, Ohio: Department of Slavic and East European Languages and Cultures and the Resource Center for Medieval Slavic Studies, The Ohio State University, 2016,261-293. N ik o l a o s C h r is s id is spiritual father (or presiding clergyman) a last opportunity to plead for divine pardon on behalf of the dead person through a written prayer.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly, 2021
    INSIDE: l Bishop Emeritus Losten celebrates 50th anniversary of episcopal consecration – page 4 l UMANA holds 39th Assembly of Delegates virtually, elects new officers – page 9 l Ukraine finishes third in Group C at Euro 2020, to face Sweden next – page 14 THEPublished U by theKRAINIAN Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal Wnon-profit associationEEKLY Vol. LXXXIX No. 26-27 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, JUNE 27-JULY 4, 2021 $2.00 EU leaders met to discuss Ukraine sanctions Firtash as Zelenskyy continues strategy for relations with Russia fight against the country’s oligarchs Kuleba calls potential EU summit with Putin a “dangerous deviation from EU sanctions policy” Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty European Union leaders gathered in Brussels on June 24 for a two-day summit during which they were scheduled to dis- cuss a new strategy to manage relations with Russia amid signs of a split with some members pushing for a meeting with President Vladimir Putin, and others opposed given their deep-seated distrust of Russia’s head of state. EU leaders were set to consider wheth- er to seek a summit with Mr. Putin as part of the new strategy, a meeting that follows Presidential Office of Ukraine U.S. President Joe Biden’s summit with Mr. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy addresses participants of the forum Putin on June 16. “Ukraine 30. Economy without Oligarchs.” Envoys for France and Germany put for- Andriy Dubchak, RadioSvoboda.org via RFE/RL ward a last-minute proposal to hold a sum- Ukrainian Foreign Affairs Minister Dmyt­ by Roman Tymotsko nessmen Pavlo Fuks.
    [Show full text]
  • Easter Pastoral of the Ukrainian Catholic Hierarchy of the U. S. A. to Our Clergy, Hieromonks and Brothers, Religious Sisters, Seminarians, and Beloved Faithful
    Україномовна частина знаходится на СТ. 5 The Sower OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE UKRAINIAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF STAMFORD Vol. XXXVIII; No. 3 Stamford, Connecticut 06902 March 22, 2020 Easter Pastoral of the Ukrainian Catholic Hierarchy of the U. S. A. to Our Clergy, Hieromonks and Brothers, Religious Sisters, Seminarians, and Beloved Faithful. Pascha is the greatest and most joyful selves and leave something behind. Before feast in the liturgical calendar, a feast of we make a commitment to our spouse in overflowing happiness. It is interesting to marriage, we are called to let go of our note, however, that the Feast of Pascha independence. Before we respond to a begins with sorrow and emptiness. vocation call or make a career choice, we The Evangelists, in their telling of the are called to let go of other opportunities. story of Pascha, begin, not with the joy of At every step of life, in order to receive the Resurrection, but with the sadness of new life, we are called to empty ourselves the empty tomb. Mary Magdalene and in some way. And so it is in our spiritual the other women come, lamenting and life as well. sorrowful, early in the morning, to the Emptiness is part of the human experi4 grave of Jesus in order to anoint the body ence. Sometimes it can be seen as pain; yet of their beloved teacher. Instead of Jesus’ it can also be treated as a gift. We each body, however, they discover an empty need that emptiness in ourselves: that tomb. Horrified, they think that someone space that makes room for something new, has inexplicably stolen the body! Only that space that can be opened to God.
    [Show full text]