Eastside Lichen Report for Washington and Oregon

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Eastside Lichen Report for Washington and Oregon key groups 5. KEY ECOLOGICAL GROUPS Due to changes in my understanding during-preparation of this report, I have treated ecological groups and functional groups separately; As I am treating them, "ecological groupsll are aggregates of species more or less associated with particular substrates and environmental conditions, but not necessarily sharing the same functions, while *'functional groups@1 (treated in detail in the separate section on them) are sets of species, some of which may also be ecological groups, that have certain functions in common. However, many species are treated under several different groups'of each type, and information on both function and ecology is presented the "Ecological Groups 11 documents (see below), as it occurred to me, at each level of specificity in the hierarchies. To draw attention to "key" groups (which I interpret to mean groups associated with'or .including '"major" or 18specialfl ecological or functional categories), I have summarized my conclusions in the tables and in brief summaries below. A. ECOLOGICA~I GROUPS ORGANIZATION OF TEE INFORMATION; AND GENERAL COMMENTS Information on known or presumed ecological groups (in the loose sense of species or.communities of lichens. found together on similar substrate types and in one or more localities that are known or inferred to share certain ecological features), is summarized in various tables, which are extracted from a.series of long documents providing various types and levels of detail. This is done in three separate "Ecological Groups" documents, for each main substrate group (I. Corticolous / Lignicolous, II. Terricolous / Muscicolous, and III. Saxicolous). The information is mostly sorted first by habitat (substrate type, then various levels of zones or communities of vascular plants, or special habitats) then by province. Variations on this organization were sometimes used to deal with particular problems or -situations. Organization within g'Ecological Group&' Uocuments: Within each substrate group, general information applicable to the group as a whole; and to taxa or communities that occur over a wide range of major zones, is presented first. Likewise, within each zone.and level of community the information is nested, starting with the most general and proceeding towards the most specific. Information on species occurrences in these documents was in turn extracted from the even more specific information on collections at each.locality, presented in the document llCollecting Data". Reasons behind the organization of'the information: Although these methods of organizing and interpreting the information resulted in bulky documents with a fair amount of redundancy, they seemed to be necessary because of the variable and often problematic nature of the information. The purpose was to show the various levels of detail and reliability of the information key groups on which generalizations, inferences.. or speculations were based, at .each level. .I separated the two sets of documents for each main substrate type from each other because my initial attempts at combining the.generalized remarks,and information on vascular plant zones and communities with all the detail from collecting data were leading, to even more- bulky and,complex documents. Also, in the -Ecological Groups documents I wanted to use full sentences, which I did not do in the Collecting Data documents. .Problems in treatment of information from some localities: Due to various difficulties encountered during the process, there are some inconsistencies among the various,documents. Because the documents for each substrate type were prepared- separately, and because of the vagueness.and"ambiguity of both the data and maps, species from the same locality may be treated under different zones, communities, or provinces in different documents;. In some cases my interpretation of the data changed, as I cross-checked among the.documents; e.g., in dealing with the saxicolous taxa from a-locality I may have assumed the site was in a grassland, but when I looked at data on corticolous taxa I released it was actually in a forest. Although this may be cycling reasoning, in some cases the lichen floras themselves influenced my interpretation of the site (e.g., I interpreted site with numerous characteristically alpine.terricolous lichen species under the alpine zone, rather than under subalpine, even when some corticolous species were also listed for the site, because collectors often lump collections made on the way up to the alpine zone under the same locality). In the NEcological Groups" documents, vague or ambiguous data are mostly dealt with in the more generalized parts at the beginning of each level. Elevations: Some errors or discrepancies in elevations.are also present, due to confusion resulting from constantly switching between meters and feet and between maps with different contour intervals. Although,1 have not had time to catch and correct all of these problems, I.do not expect.them to seriously affect the conclusions. '. C. Since no lists of GIS attributes were sent to me, and most of the data are vague, I have presented whatlimited data are available..and made broad-.generalizations based on my.own experience. , KEY ECOLOGICAL GROUPS Saxicolous lichens in aquatic/se&-aquatic habitats: These include Hvmenelia lacustris, Hvdrothvria venosa and some species of ASDiCilia, Dermatocaroon, Staurothele, and Verrucaria: They occur especially in forests or woodlands, and up' into the subalpine or alpine zones. .&#xicolous lichens on exposed, weakly to moderately enriched vertical or overhanging cliffs: Acarosoora Wchloroohanall is characteristic of this habitat in all zones. Saxicolous lichens on strongly enriched surfaces 2 key groups (including some parts of exposed cliffs): CaloDlaca saxicola and Xanthoria spp. are usually dominant; Phvscia spp., some Lecanora spp., and RhizoDlaca spp. are dominants in somewhat less strongly enriched areas. Corticolous lichens on enriched bark in dry to moist deciduous woodlands: These are mostly foliose (including Phvscia spp., Xanthoria spp.) and crustose (e.g., species of CaloDlaca and' Lecanora). Corticolous lichens in moist, later stage deciduous woodlands: Large nitrogen-fixing genera such as Lobaria) are especially characteristic in this group. Terricolous/muscicolous lichens of grassland-Savannah (steppe and shrub-steppe): These include some species that. are restricted to dry, open habitats at low to moderate elevations (e.g., AcarosDora schleicheri, most Psora spp., and vagrant forms of DermatOCarDOn spp.), and others that also occur in forests or the alpine zone (e.g., Cladonia chloroDhaea group, DiDloschistes spp., MeoasDora verrucosa, and the nitrogen-fixers LeDtochidium albociliatum, LeDtosium SPP*, Peltisera rufescens). Corticolous/lignicolous lichens of dry coniferous forests: These generally consist of communities of fruticose ,lichens .(dominated by Letharia spp. in the drier or lower zones, and Bvroria spp. in the moister, higher zones, or also Alectoria sarmentosa in the highest forest zones), foliose lichens (dominated by various combinations of species HvDoovmnia, Melanelia, Parmelia, Platismatiq, TuckermannoDsis, and Vulpicida, or sometimes also other genera, such as ParmelioDsis spp.), and crustose lichens (various genera, including HvDocenomvce spp. on burnt substrates, and most members of the Caliciales, in later . stage, moister communities). Terricolous/muscicolous lichens of dry coniferous forests: Species of Cladonia or Peltiqera generally form dominant communities; various other genera of macrolichens and crustose species also occur. Saxicolous lichens of dry coniferous forests: Umbilicaria species may be among the more characteristic macrolichens on rocks in forests. Corticolous/lignicolous lichens of subalpine areas: Ahtiana SDhaerOSDOrella is characteristic on conifers, although Alectoria sarmentosa and Brvoria spp. are more often the dominant taxa; Tuckermannopsis subalpina is essentially restricted to subalpine shrubs. Terricolous/muscicolous lichens of alpine areas: At least in the North Cascades, the dominants are often either LeDraria nealecta or Cetraria spp., with various other taxa abundant in a few kinds of communities. Most of the species, except some species of Cladonia and Peltiaera, are restricted to or characteristic of the alpine zone. 3 key grqups .Saxicolous lichens of alpine'areas: Many of the taxa more or less restricted to the alpine zone (e.g., AllafitoDarmelia,,Brodoa, ODhioDarma, and SDorastatia, and some.species of Umbilicaria), plus PseudeDhebe spp., which are much more abundant in this zone than in lower ones. , Miscellaneous: .' I _ ._ .' : -.: .; . :. , . I . _. - .I . 4 Environmental factors 6. KEY ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS Information on environmental factors for major or special concern species, and for various levels of ecological groups, is presented in the documents dealing with those topics, respectively. Data on climate and soil-come primarily from cited reports on the vascular vegetation (mainly Franklin & Dyrness, 1973). Information on other factors consists mainly of data from labels, plus my own opinions, as influenced by my experience and- reading (mostly not cited, except where it is based on studies in the Columbia Basin region). I. HIERARCHICAL CATALOGS OF FACTORS: The first three parts of this summary consists of: ri. CATALOG OF "ULTIMATE" FACTORS (physical, chemical, or biological variables that directly affect the lichens, but interact with each other in complex-ways,
Recommended publications
  • Checklist of Calicioid Lichens and Fungi for Genera with Members in Temperate Western North America Draft: 2012-03-13
    Draft: 2012-03-13 Checklist of Calicioids – E. B. Peterson Checklist of Calicioid Lichens and Fungi For Genera with Members in Temperate Western North America Draft: 2012-03-13 by E. B. Peterson Calicium abietinum, EBP#4640 1 Draft: 2012-03-13 Checklist of Calicioids – E. B. Peterson Genera Acroscyphus Lév. Brucea Rikkinen Calicium Pers. Chaenotheca Th. Fr. Chaenothecopsis Vainio Coniocybe Ach. = Chaenotheca "Cryptocalicium" – potentially undescribed genus; taxonomic placement is not known but there are resemblances both to Mycocaliciales and Onygenales Cybebe Tibell = Chaenotheca Cyphelium Ach. Microcalicium Vainio Mycocalicium Vainio Phaeocalicium A.F.W. Schmidt Sclerophora Chevall. Sphinctrina Fr. Stenocybe (Nyl.) Körber Texosporium Nádv. ex Tibell & Hofsten Thelomma A. Massal. Tholurna Norman Additional genera are primarily tropical, such as Pyrgillus, Tylophoron About the Species lists Names in bold are believed to be currently valid names. Old synonyms are indented and listed with the current name following (additional synonyms can be found in Esslinger (2011). Names in quotes are nicknames for undescribed species. Names given within tildes (~) are published, but may not be validly published. Underlined species are included in the checklist for North America north of Mexico (Esslinger 2011). Names are given with authorities and original citation date where possible, followed by a colon. Additional citations are given after the colon, followed by a series of abbreviations for states and regions where known. States and provinces use the standard two-letter abbreviation. Regions include: NAm = North America; WNA = western North America (west of the continental divide); Klam = Klamath Region (my home territory). For those not known from North America, continental distribution may be given: SAm = South America; EUR = Europe; ASIA = Asia; Afr = Africa; Aus = Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Spring Cattle Grazing on the Nutritional Ecology of Mule Deer
    THE EFFECTS OF SPRING CATTLE GRAZING ON THE NUTRITIONAL ECOLOGY OF MULE DEER (ODOCOILEUS HEMIONUS) IN EASTERN WASHINGTON By SARA JANE WAGONER A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCES IN NATURAL RESOURCE SCIENCES WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY Department of Natural Resource Sciences MAY 2011 To the Faculty of Washington State University The members of the Committee appointed to examine the thesis of SARA JANE WAGONER find it satisfactory and recommend that it be accepted ________________________________ Lisa A. Shipley, Ph.D., Chair ________________________________ Linda H. Hardesty, Ph.D. ________________________________ Kristen A. Johnson, Ph.D. ________________________________ Karen L. Launchbaugh, Ph.D. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project was fully funded and supported by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), and partnered by the Washington Cattlemen’s Association. My advisor, Dr. Lisa A. Shipley, whom was the brain-child and brawn-child behind this enormous endeavor, tirelessly offered perspective and assistance when I needed it, and I am forever indebted. A sincere thank you to my committee members: Linda Hardesty, Kristen Johnson, and Karen Launchbaugh for contributing their range science expertise and logistical input to our experimental design. I extend my appreciation to Rachel and John Cook, for giving me the opportunity to work along side them at Starkey; it gave me a real grasp on what I was getting into; especially to Rachel, for her professional guidance, friendship, and assistance towards this project. Thank you Laura Applegate, Taryn Clark, Becky Greenwood, Ben Maletzke, Tamara Johnstone-Yellin. and Sarah McCusker for selflessly pitching in, you are truly great friends.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Simcoe Mountains Volcanic Field, Main Central Segment, Yakama Nation, Washington by Wes Hildreth and Judy Fierstein
    Prepared in Cooperation with the Water Resources Program of the Yakama Nation Geologic Map of the Simcoe Mountains Volcanic Field, Main Central Segment, Yakama Nation, Washington By Wes Hildreth and Judy Fierstein Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3315 Photograph showing Mount Adams andesitic stratovolcano and Signal Peak mafic shield volcano viewed westward from near Mill Creek Guard Station. Low-relief rocky meadows and modest forested ridges marked by scattered cinder cones and shields are common landforms in Simcoe Mountains volcanic field. Mount Adams (elevation: 12,276 ft; 3,742 m) is centered 50 km west and 2.8 km higher than foreground meadow (elevation: 2,950 ft.; 900 m); its eruptions began ~520 ka, its upper cone was built in late Pleistocene, and several eruptions have taken place in the Holocene. Signal Peak (elevation: 5,100 ft; 1,555 m), 20 km west of camera, is one of largest and highest eruptive centers in Simcoe Mountains volcanic field; short-lived shield, built around 3.7 Ma, is seven times older than Mount Adams. 2015 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Contents Introductory Overview for Non-Geologists ...............................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................2 Physiography, Environment, Boundary Surveys, and Access ......................................................6 Previous Geologic
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Basalts and Glacier Floods—Roadside Geology
    u 0 by Robert J. Carson and Kevin R. Pogue WASHINGTON DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES Information Circular 90 January 1996 WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENTOF Natural Resources Jennifer M. Belcher - Commissioner of Public Lands Kaleen Cottingham - Supervisor FLOOD BASALTS AND GLACIER FLOODS: Roadside Geology of Parts of Walla Walla, Franklin, and Columbia Counties, Washington by Robert J. Carson and Kevin R. Pogue WASHINGTON DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES Information Circular 90 January 1996 Kaleen Cottingham - Supervisor Division of Geology and Earth Resources WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Jennifer M. Belcher-Commissio11er of Public Lands Kaleeo Cottingham-Supervisor DMSION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES Raymond Lasmanis-State Geologist J. Eric Schuster-Assistant State Geologist William S. Lingley, Jr.-Assistant State Geologist This report is available from: Publications Washington Department of Natural Resources Division of Geology and Earth Resources P.O. Box 47007 Olympia, WA 98504-7007 Price $ 3.24 Tax (WA residents only) ~ Total $ 3.50 Mail orders must be prepaid: please add $1.00 to each order for postage and handling. Make checks payable to the Department of Natural Resources. Front Cover: Palouse Falls (56 m high) in the canyon of the Palouse River. Printed oo recycled paper Printed io the United States of America Contents 1 General geology of southeastern Washington 1 Magnetic polarity 2 Geologic time 2 Columbia River Basalt Group 2 Tectonic features 5 Quaternary sedimentation 6 Road log 7 Further reading 7 Acknowledgments 8 Part 1 - Walla Walla to Palouse Falls (69.0 miles) 21 Part 2 - Palouse Falls to Lower Monumental Dam (27.0 miles) 26 Part 3 - Lower Monumental Dam to Ice Harbor Dam (38.7 miles) 33 Part 4 - Ice Harbor Dam to Wallula Gap (26.7 mi les) 38 Part 5 - Wallula Gap to Walla Walla (42.0 miles) 44 References cited ILLUSTRATIONS I Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • State Parks and Recreation Commission
    Table 1 Ten Year Capital Plan Project Listing Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Prior Reapprop. New Approp. New Approp. New Approp. New Approp. New Approp. Major Function, Agency, Project Estimate Total Expenditures 2017-19 2017-19 2019-21 2021-23 2023-25 2025-27 State Parks and Recreation Commission 30000086 Twin Harbors State Park: Relocate Campground State Building Construction Account - State 26,482,000 496,000 1,310,000 12,338,000 12,338,000 30000100 Fort Flagler - WW1 Historic Facilities Preservation State Building Construction Account - State 7,639,000 430,000 3,386,000 3,823,000 30000109 Fort Casey - Lighthouse Historic Preservation State Building Construction Account - State 1,616,000 217,000 1,399,000 30000155 Fort Simcoe - Historic Officers Quarters Renovation State Building Construction Account - State 1,770,000 292,000 1,478,000 30000253 Iron Horse - John Wayne Trail - Repair Tunnels Trestles Culv Ph 3 State Building Construction Account - State 4,877,000 606,000 4,271,000 30000287 Fort Worden - Housing Areas Exterior Improvements State Building Construction Account - State 6,605,000 500,000 1,043,000 2,461,000 2,601,000 30000305 Sun Lakes State Park: Dry Falls Campground Renovation State Building Construction Account - State 402,000 52,000 350,000 30000328 Camp Wooten Dining Hall Replacement State Building Construction Account - State 2,563,000 326,000 2,237,000 Table 1 Ten Year Capital Plan Project Listing Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Prior Reapprop. New Approp. New Approp. New Approp. New Approp. New Approp.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropological Study of Yakama Tribe
    1 Anthropological Study of Yakama Tribe: Traditional Resource Harvest Sites West of the Crest of the Cascades Mountains in Washington State and below the Cascades of the Columbia River Eugene Hunn Department of Anthropology Box 353100 University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195-3100 [email protected] for State of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife WDFW contract # 38030449 preliminary draft October 11, 2003 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements 4 Executive Summary 5 Map 1 5f 1. Goals and scope of this report 6 2. Defining the relevant Indian groups 7 2.1. How Sahaptin names for Indian groups are formed 7 2.2. The Yakama Nation 8 Table 1: Yakama signatory tribes and bands 8 Table 2: Yakama headmen and chiefs 8-9 2.3. Who are the ―Klickitat‖? 10 2.4. Who are the ―Cascade Indians‖? 11 2.5. Who are the ―Cowlitz‖/Taitnapam? 11 2.6. The Plateau/Northwest Coast cultural divide: Treaty lines versus cultural 12 divides 2.6.1. The Handbook of North American Indians: Northwest Coast versus 13 Plateau 2.7. Conclusions 14 3. Historical questions 15 3.1. A brief summary of early Euroamerican influences in the region 15 3.2. How did Sahaptin-speakers end up west of the Cascade crest? 17 Map 2 18f 3.3. James Teit‘s hypothesis 18 3.4. Melville Jacobs‘s counter argument 19 4. The Taitnapam 21 4.1. Taitnapam sources 21 4.2. Taitnapam affiliations 22 4.3. Taitnapam territory 23 4.3.1. Jim Yoke and Lewy Costima on Taitnapam territory 24 4.4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wild Cascades
    THE WILD CASCADES October-November 1969 2 THE WILD CASCADES FARTHEST EAST: CHOPAKA MOUNTAIN Field Notes of an N3C Reconnaissance State of Washington, school lands managed by May 1969 the Department of Natural Resources. The absolute easternmost peak of the North Cascades is Chopaka Mountain, 7882 feet. An This probably is the most spectacular chunk abrupt and impressive 6700-foot scarp drops of alpine terrain owned by the state. Certain­ from the flowery summit to blue waters of ly its fame will soon spread far beyond the Palmer Lake and meanders of the Similka- Okanogan. Certainly the state should take a mean River, surrounded by green pastures new, close look at Chopaka and develop a re­ and orchards. Beyond, across this wide vised management plan that takes into account trough of a Pleistocene glacier, roll brown the scenic and recreational resources. hills of the Okanogan Highlands. Northward are distant, snowy beginnings of Canadian ranges. Far south, Tiffany Mountain stands above forested branches of Toats Coulee Our gang became aware of Chopaka on the Creek. Close to the west is the Pasayten Fourth of July weekend of 1968 while explor­ Wilderness Area, dominated here by Windy ing Horseshoe Basin -- now protected (except Peak, Horseshoe Mountain, Arnold Peak — from Emmet Smith's cattle) within the Pasay­ the Horseshoe Basin country. Farther west, ten Wilderness Area. We looked east to the hazy-dreamy on the horizon, rise summits of wide-open ridges of Chopaka Mountain and the Chelan Crest and Washington Pass. were intrigued. To get there, drive the Okanogan Valley to On our way to Horseshoe Basin we met Wil­ Tonasket and turn west to Loomis in the Sin- lis Erwin, one of the Okanoganites chiefly lahekin Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Lichen Functional Trait Variation Along an East-West Climatic Gradient in Oregon and Among Habitats in Katmai National Park, Alaska
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Kaleigh Spickerman for the degree of Master of Science in Botany and Plant Pathology presented on June 11, 2015 Title: Lichen Functional Trait Variation Along an East-West Climatic Gradient in Oregon and Among Habitats in Katmai National Park, Alaska Abstract approved: ______________________________________________________ Bruce McCune Functional traits of vascular plants have been an important component of ecological studies for a number of years; however, in more recent times vascular plant ecologists have begun to formalize a set of key traits and universal system of trait measurement. Many recent studies hypothesize global generality of trait patterns, which would allow for comparison among ecosystems and biomes and provide a foundation for general rules and theories, the so-called “Holy Grail” of ecology. However, the majority of these studies focus on functional trait patterns of vascular plants, with a minority examining the patterns of cryptograms such as lichens. Lichens are an important component of many ecosystems due to their contributions to biodiversity and their key ecosystem services, such as contributions to mineral and hydrological cycles and ecosystem food webs. Lichens are also of special interest because of their reliance on atmospheric deposition for nutrients and water, which makes them particularly sensitive to air pollution. Therefore, they are often used as bioindicators of air pollution, climate change, and general ecosystem health. This thesis examines the functional trait patterns of lichens in two contrasting regions with fundamentally different kinds of data. To better understand the patterns of lichen functional traits, we examined reproductive, morphological, and chemical trait variation along precipitation and temperature gradients in Oregon.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013-15 Capital Budget Omnibus Capital Only
    2013-15 Capital Budget Omnibus Capital Only TABLE OF CONTENTS Subject Page Capital Budget pages begin with C - Budget Highlights .............................................................................. 1 Bar Chart: Total Appropriations in the Capital Budget (10 Year History) ................................ 6 Pie Chart: Capital Budget by Functional Area Comparison of 2011-13 and 2013-15 Enacted ................ 7 New Appropriations Project List .................................................................. 8 Alternatively Financed Projects .................................................................. 20 Project Lists Housing Trust Fund Project List – LEAP Capital Document 2013-1A ............................... 21 Aquatic Lands Enhancement Account – LEAP Capital Document 2013-2B .......................... 24 Trust Land Transfer Program – LEAP Capital Document 2013-3A ................................. 25 Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program – LEAP Capital Document 2013-6A .................... 26 Projects for Jobs and Economic Development ................................................... 32 Projects that Strengthen Communities and Quality of Life ......................................... 33 Projects that Strengthen Youth and Families .................................................... 35 Building for the Arts ....................................................................... 36 Youth Recreational Facilities ................................................................ 37 Building Communities Fund ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Washington Fishing Prospects
    2011 Washington Fishing Prospects WHERE TO CATCH FISH IN THE EVERGREEN STATE Washington Department of FISH AND WILDLIFE 600 Capitol Way N – Olympia, WA 98501-1091 http://wdfw.wa.gov 1 CONTENTS Agency’s Contact Information 3 WDFW Regional Office Contact Information 4 What’s New for 2011-2012 Season? 5 Introduction 6 Licensing 10 License types and fees 11 Juvenile, Youth, Senior information 11 Military Licensing information 11 Fishing Kids Program and Schedule 12 “Go Play Outside” Initiative 13 Fish Consumption (Health) Advisories 13 Accessible Fishing for Persons with Disabilities 14 Accessible Outdoor Recreation Guild 15 Launch and Moorage Locations 15 Washington State Parks 15 Sport Fish of Washington 16 County-by-County Listings 30 Juvenile-Only and other special fishing waters in Washington 146 Fly-fishing Only waters in Washington 148 2011 Triploid Rainbow Trout Stocking Information 149 WDFW State Record Sport Fish Application information 149 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This publication is produced by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Inland Fish Program Manager, Jim Uehara, using information supplied by the Department’s field biological staff, including: Eric Anderson, Charmane Ashbrook, Steve Caromile, Jim Cummins, Wolf Dammers, Chris Donley, Mark Downen, Rick Ereth, Joe Hymer, Paul Hoffarth, Chad Jackson, Bob Jateff, Thom Johnson, Jeff Korth, Glen Mendel, Larry Phillips, Mike Scharpf, Art Viola, John Weinheimer, and no doubt other staff that were inadvertently omitted. Accessibility and Boating information is provided by the
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Study Areas
    I ___- .-ll..l .“..l..““l.--..- I. _.^.___” _^.__.._._ - ._____.-.-.. ------ FEDERAL LAND M.ANAGEMENT Status and Uses of Wilderness Study Areas I 150156 RESTRICTED--Not to be released outside the General Accounting Wice unless specifically approved by the Office of Congressional Relations. ssBO4’8 RELEASED ---- ---. - (;Ao/li:( ‘I:I)-!L~-l~~lL - United States General Accounting OfTice GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division B-262989 September 23,1993 The Honorable Bruce F. Vento Chairman, Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands Committee on Natural Resources House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: Concerned about alleged degradation of areas being considered for possible inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System (wilderness study areas), you requested that we provide you with information on the types and effects of activities in these study areas. As agreed with your office, we gathered information on areas managed by two agencies: the Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Land Management (BLN) and the Department of Agriculture’s Forest Service. Specifically, this report provides information on (1) legislative guidance and the agency policies governing wilderness study area management, (2) the various activities and uses occurring in the agencies’ study areas, (3) the ways these activities and uses affect the areas, and (4) agency actions to monitor and restrict these uses and to repair damage resulting from them. Appendixes I and II provide data on the number, acreage, and locations of wilderness study areas managed by BLM and the Forest Service, as well as data on the types of uses occurring in the areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Recreation Reports Are Printed Every Other Week. February 17, 2016
    Editor’s Note: Recreation Reports are printed every other week. February 17, 2016 Recent rain storms and warmer afternoon temperatures have caused snow at lower elevations and in valley bottoms to melt. There is still a lot of snow in the woods, but very low elevation areas are quickly melting out with bare ground, ditch lines, stumps, downed logs and other hidden obstacles rapidly emerging from the snow. Along with the snow melt comes higher water levels in local rivers, creeks and streams especially in the afternoon. A stream that is easily crossed in the early morning hours may become impassable later in the day when temperatures accelerate snow melt. Also, snow bridges over waterways may not be sturdy enough to carry the weight of a person or snow machine; always test these areas before using them. Check current weather and avalanche forecasts before venturing out; go to www.nwac.us for current avalanche conditions. As temperatures increase, snow grooming operations may be sporadic on snowmobile and cross- country ski routes. It is not uncommon for ice to build up overnight and then melt off a bit during the day. Be sure to park in a manner so that your vehicle doesn’t sink in the melting snow and then freeze in place as temperatures drop in the evening. Other signs of spring-like conditions seen in the forest and along local rivers is the abundance of birds migrating back to the area. Chickadees, juncos, finches, sparrows, geese, ducks, and swans are just a few of the birds seen locally.
    [Show full text]