DOCSLIB.ORG

Rare, Threatened and Endangered Plants and Animals of Oregon

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rare, Threatened and Endangered Plants and Animals of Oregon RARE, THREATENED AND ENDANGERED PLANTS AND ANIMALS OF OREGON OREGON NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM FEBRUARY 2001 Oregon Natural Heritage Program 1322 S.E. Morrison St. Portland, OR 97214-2531 (503) 731-3070 www.heritage.tnc.org/nhp/us/or A Cooperative Project of The Nature Conservancy, Division of State Lands and Oregon State University With assistance from: The Native Plant Society of Oregon The Nature Conservancy The Oregon Department of Agriculture The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife The Oregon Division of State Lands The Oregon Natural Heritage Advisory Council Oregon State University Compiled and Published by the staff of the Oregon Natural Heritage Program: Jimmy Kagan, Director/Ecologist Eric Scheuering, Zoologist/Data Manager Sue Vrilakas, Data Manager/Botanist John Christy, Wetlands Ecologist, Bryologist Eleanor Gaines, GIS Data Manager/Zoologist Mary Finnerty, GIS Analyst Cliff Alton, Data Services Assistant Jon Hak, GIS Program Manager Ken Popper, Zoologist Michael Murray, Ecologist Mark Stern, Zoology Program Manager Claudine Tobalske, GIS Analyst Cover Illustration: Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) by Jay Miner. Bibliographic reference to this publication should read: Oregon Natural Heritage Program. 2001. Rare, Threatened and Endangered Plants and Animals of Oregon. Oregon Natural Heritage Program, Portland, Oregon. 94 pp. (98 pp. PDF). CONTENTS Introduction ...................................................................... 1 Distribution Information ............................................................. 2 Oregon Map with Ecoregions and Counties .............................................. 3 Definitions ....................................................................... 4 Special Animals ................................................................... 5 Summary List ................................................................... 8 Fish ........................................................................ 8 Amphibians .................................................................. 11 Reptiles ..................................................................... 12 Birds ....................................................................... 13 Mammals ................................................................... 17 Invertebrates ................................................................. 19 Animals Arranged by Status ....................................................... 30 Federal Listed and Proposed and State Listed Animal Species ............................ 30 Federal Animal Candidates and Species of Concern ................................... 31 ODFW Sensitive Animal Species List .............................................. 32 ORNHP List 1 ............................................................... 34 ORNHP List 2 ............................................................... 35 ORNHP List 3 ............................................................... 36 ORNHP List 4 ............................................................... 37 ORNHP Taxa Considered but Rejected ............................................ 38 Special Plants .................................................................... 40 Main List ..................................................................... 43 Vascular Plants ............................................................... 43 Liverworts .................................................................. 74 Mosses .................................................................... 75 Lichens ..................................................................... 78 Fungi ...................................................................... 80 Plants Arranged by Status ........................................................ 86 USFWS Federally Listed, Proposed Taxa and Species of Concern ........................ 86 ODA State Listed, Proposed and Candidate Taxa .................................... 87 ORNHP List 1 ............................................................... 88 ORNHP List 2 ............................................................... 89 ORNHP List 3 ............................................................... 90 ORNHP List 4 ............................................................... 93 ORNHP Taxa Considered but Rejected ............................................ 93 Acknowledgments ................................................................ 97 Abbreviations .................................................................... 98 INTRODUCTION Extinction is a natural process. Today, however, Oregon Natural Heritage Program (ORNHP) plant and animal species are disappearing world-wide at ORNHP maintains comprehensive data bases for an accelerated pace. Based on current trends, half of Oregon biodiversity, concentrating on the rare and the species on earth will be extinct within the next 100 endangered plants, animals and ecosystems. Site specific years. The major cause of this phenomenon is information is available at ONRHP. The program is a large-scale destruction of native habitats, which has partnership between The Division of State Lands, The increased since European settlement began in the mid Nature Conservancy of Oregon and Oregon State 1800's - in Oregon and throughout the New World. University, currently supported primarily by federal natural resource agencies. Biologists working for these agencies, Once lost, a species can never be recovered, and together with the state's herbaria and museums, provide there is no way of knowing how useful it may have most of the information that comprise ORNHP's been. We do know that human beings and many of their databases. The Natural Heritage Advisory Council industries depend on plant and animal products. About oversees the registration and dedication of ecologically 50% of all pharmaceuticals have a natural component as significant natural areas and the creation of Oregon's an active ingredient, yet less than one percent of the Natural Heritage Plan. world's species have been chemically analyzed and tested. Many invertebrates and plants contain This book has been compiled using the most current undescribed and highly functional compounds. information available on the distribution and abundance of Limnanthes floccosa subsp. grandiflora, or wooly plants and animals native to Oregon. Although based on a meadow-foam, a rare plant that grows in southwest large volume of information, it is by no means complete. Oregon, has been recently found to produce a hybrid Much is known about some species, little about others. with the more common member of the genus, ORNHP welcomes additional information or comments Limnanthes alba. This hybrid grows well in the poorly regarding any of the taxa listed herein. Such information, drained soils of the Willamette Valley and produces a as well as data requests, should be directed to: valuable oil used for soaps, plastic and rubber production. Oregon Natural Heritage Program In addition, the new hybrid meadow-foam does not 1322 SE Morrison St. require the field burning necessary for other crops. This Portland, Oregon 97214 species, and many other Oregon natives, will be lost (503) 731-3070 without intervention. The purpose of this book is to This book will be reprinted every third year. It will provide land managers, owners and interested parties be updated each year, with updates posted on our home with a list of those species in Oregon which are in page (www.heritage.tnc.org/nhp/us/or). Copies may be greatest jeopardy. obtained at cost from ORNHP. Oregon State Endangered Species Programs Outline In 1987, the Oregon Legislature passed an The book is divided into animal and plant sections. Endangered Species Act which gave the Oregon The sections begin with a description of the animal and Department of Agriculture responsibility and jurisdiction plant programs in the state and are followed by the main over threatened and endangered plants, and reaffirmed list of animals and plants. For animals, the list is divided the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife's into major groups: fish, amphibians, reptiles, mammals, responsibility for threatened and endangered fish and birds, and invertebrates and then arranged alphabetically wildlife. Both of these agencies have entered into by scientific name. The plant list is first divided into four cooperative (Section 6) agreements with the United groups: vascular plants, non-vascular plants, lichens and States Fish and Wildlife Service for the purpose of fungi, and then alphabetized by scientific name. The carrying out research and conservation programs for information for each taxa includes 1) scientific and animal and plant species under the auspices of the common names with authorities for plants, along with federal Endangered Species Act. The Oregon Natural synonymy if the name is new; 2) county, ecoregion, and Heritage Program (ORNHP) has a similar agreement adjacent state distribution information, and 3) the state and with the Fish and Wildlife Service for invertebrates. federal status, as well as the ORNHP list and The More information on the state endangered species Association for Biodiversity Information’s (ABI) Heritage programs can be found at the beginning of the animal and Network Global and State ranks. Distribution plant sections of this book. abbreviations are listed and explained on the next page. 1 Criteria and Definitions Inclusion of any given taxon on these lists is based on Taxonomic experts who were consulted are listed in several specific
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix K. Survey and Manage Species Persistence Evaluation
    Appendix K. Survey and Manage Species Persistence Evaluation Establishment of the 95-foot wide construction corridor and TEWAs would likely remove individuals of H. caeruleus and modify microclimate conditions around individuals that are not removed. The removal of forests and host trees and disturbance to soil could negatively affect H. caeruleus in adjacent areas by removing its habitat, disturbing the roots of host trees, and affecting its mycorrhizal association with the trees, potentially affecting site persistence. Restored portions of the corridor and TEWAs would be dominated by early seral vegetation for approximately 30 years, which would result in long-term changes to habitat conditions. A 30-foot wide portion of the corridor would be maintained in low-growing vegetation for pipeline maintenance and would not provide habitat for the species during the life of the project. Hygrophorus caeruleus is not likely to persist at one of the sites in the project area because of the extent of impacts and the proximity of the recorded observation to the corridor. Hygrophorus caeruleus is likely to persist at the remaining three sites in the project area (MP 168.8 and MP 172.4 (north), and MP 172.5-172.7) because the majority of observations within the sites are more than 90 feet from the corridor, where direct effects are not anticipated and indirect effects are unlikely. The site at MP 168.8 is in a forested area on an east-facing slope, and a paved road occurs through the southeast part of the site. Four out of five observations are more than 90 feet southwest of the corridor and are not likely to be directly or indirectly affected by the PCGP Project based on the distance from the corridor, extent of forests surrounding the observations, and proximity to an existing open corridor (the road), indicating the species is likely resilient to edge- related effects at the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Well-Known Plants in Each Angiosperm Order
    Well-known plants in each angiosperm order This list is generally from least evolved (most ancient) to most evolved (most modern). (I’m not sure if this applies for Eudicots; I’m listing them in the same order as APG II.) The first few plants are mostly primitive pond and aquarium plants. Next is Illicium (anise tree) from Austrobaileyales, then the magnoliids (Canellales thru Piperales), then monocots (Acorales through Zingiberales), and finally eudicots (Buxales through Dipsacales). The plants before the eudicots in this list are considered basal angiosperms. This list focuses only on angiosperms and does not look at earlier plants such as mosses, ferns, and conifers. Basal angiosperms – mostly aquatic plants Unplaced in order, placed in Amborellaceae family • Amborella trichopoda – one of the most ancient flowering plants Unplaced in order, placed in Nymphaeaceae family • Water lily • Cabomba (fanwort) • Brasenia (watershield) Ceratophyllales • Hornwort Austrobaileyales • Illicium (anise tree, star anise) Basal angiosperms - magnoliids Canellales • Drimys (winter's bark) • Tasmanian pepper Laurales • Bay laurel • Cinnamon • Avocado • Sassafras • Camphor tree • Calycanthus (sweetshrub, spicebush) • Lindera (spicebush, Benjamin bush) Magnoliales • Custard-apple • Pawpaw • guanábana (soursop) • Sugar-apple or sweetsop • Cherimoya • Magnolia • Tuliptree • Michelia • Nutmeg • Clove Piperales • Black pepper • Kava • Lizard’s tail • Aristolochia (birthwort, pipevine, Dutchman's pipe) • Asarum (wild ginger) Basal angiosperms - monocots Acorales
    [Show full text]
  • Plant List As of 3/19/2008 Tanya Harvey T23S.R2E.S25, 36 *Non-Native
    compiled by Bearbones Mountain Plant List as of 3/19/2008 Tanya Harvey T23S.R2E.S25, 36 *Non-native FERNS & ALLIES Taxaceae Quercus garryana Oregon white oak Dennstaediaceae Taxus brevifolia Pacific yew Pteridium aquilinum Garryaceae bracken fern TREES & SHRUBS: DICOTS Garrya fremontii Fremont’s silk tassel Dryopteridaceae Aceraceae Cystopteris fragilis Acer circinatum Grossulariaceae fragile fern vine maple Ribes roezlii var. cruentum shiny-leaved gooseberry, Sierra Polystichum imbricans Acer glabrum var. douglasii imbricate sword fern Douglas maple Ribes sanguineum red-flowering currant Polystichum munitum Acer macrophyllum sword fern big-leaf maple Hydrangeaceae Polypodiaceae Berberidaceae Philadelphus lewisii western mock orange Polypodium hesperium Berberis aquifolium western polypody shining Oregon grape Rhamnaceae Pteridiaceae Berberis nervosa Ceanothus prostratus Mahala mat Aspidotis densa Cascade Oregon grape indians’ dream Betulaceae Ceanothus velutinus snowbrush Cheilanthes gracillima Corylus cornuta var. californica lace fern hazelnut or filbert Rhamnus purshiana cascara Cryptogramma acrostichoides Caprifoliaceae parsley fern Lonicera ciliosa Rosaceae Pellaea brachyptera orange honeysuckle Amelanchier alnifolia western serviceberry Sierra cliffbrake Sambucus mexicana Selaginellaceae blue elderberry Holodiscus discolor oceanspray Selaginella scopulorum Symphoricarpos mollis Rocky Mountain selaginella creeping snowberry Oemleria cerasiformis indian plum Selaginella wallacei Celastraceae Prunus emarginata Wallace’s selaginella
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Vii Table of Contents
    CHAPTER VII TABLE OF CONTENTS VII. APPENDICES AND REFERENCES CITED........................................................................1 Appendix 1: Description of Vegetation Databases......................................................................1 Appendix 2: Suggested Stocking Levels......................................................................................8 Appendix 3: Known Plants of the Desolation Watershed.........................................................15 Literature Cited............................................................................................................................25 CHAPTER VII - APPENDICES & REFERENCES - DESOLATION ECOSYSTEM ANALYSIS i VII. APPENDICES AND REFERENCES CITED Appendix 1: Description of Vegetation Databases Vegetation data for the Desolation ecosystem analysis was stored in three different databases. This document serves as a data dictionary for the existing vegetation, historical vegetation, and potential natural vegetation databases, as described below: • Interpretation of aerial photography acquired in 1995, 1996, and 1997 was used to characterize existing (current) conditions. The 1996 and 1997 photography was obtained after cessation of the Bull and Summit wildfires in order to characterize post-fire conditions. The database name is: 97veg. • Interpretation of late-1930s and early-1940s photography was used to characterize historical conditions. The database name is: 39veg. • The potential natural vegetation was determined for each polygon in the analysis
    [Show full text]
  • Bridgeoporus Nobilissimus Is Much More Abundant Than Indicated by the Presence of Basidiocarps in Forest Stands
    North American Fungi Volume 10, Number 3, Pages 1-28 Published May 29, 2015 Bridgeoporus nobilissimus is much more abundant than indicated by the presence of basidiocarps in forest stands Matthew Gordon1 and Kelli Van Norman2 1Molecular Solutions LLC, 715 NW Hoyt St., #2546, Portland, OR 97208, USA 2Interagency Special Status/Sensitive Species Program, USDI Bureau of Land Management Oregon State Office & USDA Forest Service Region 6, 1220 SW 3rd Ave., Portland, OR 97204, USA Gordon, M., and K. Van Norman. 2015. Bridgeoporus nobilissimus is much more abundant than indicated by the presence of basidiocarps in forest stands. North American Fungi 10(3): 1-28. http://dx.doi:10.2509/naf2015.010.003 Corresponding author: Matt Gordon [email protected]. Accepted for publication May 4, 2015. http://pnwfungi.org Copyright © 2015 Pacific Northwest Fungi Project. All rights reserved. Abstract: The polypore Bridgeoporus nobilissimus produces large perennial basidiocarps on large diameter Abies stumps, snags and trees in coniferous forests of the Pacific Northwest. Despite the size and persistence of the basidiocarps, they are rarely observed, making the conservation of this species a concern. We determined that a genetic marker for this fungus could be detected in DNA extracted from wood cores taken from trees hosting basidiocarps. We then tested 105 trees and stumps that did not host B. nobilissimus basidiocarps in plots surrounding B. nobilissimus conks, and 291 trees and stumps in randomly located plots in four stands that contained at least one B. nobilissimus basidiocarp. We found that trees of all sizes throughout all of the stands hosted B.
    [Show full text]
  • TO KNOW in Re On
    TO KNOW in re on FEDERAL COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE OREGON STATE COLLEGE,CORVALLIS Cooperative Extension work in Agriculture and Home Economics, F. E. Price, director. Oregon State College and the United States Department of Agriculture cooperating. Printed and distributed in furtherance of Acts of Congress of May 8 and June 30, 1914. Extension Bulletin 785 September 1959 FERN TERMS Evergreen. Said of plants whose leaves re- Pinna. A primary division of a fern leaf. main green at least until new ones are formed, (The plural of pinna is pinnae.) and of leaves that remain green more than a year. Pinnule. A secondary division of a fern leaf. Fertile leaf. A leaf that bears fruit dots or spore cases. Rhizoid. Simple hair-like structures of a Frond. The leaf of a fern. prothallium, functioning as roots. Fruit band. A line of spore cases, instead Rhizone. A somewhat horizontal and us- of fruit dots, appearing on the margin or un- ually elongated creeping subterranean stem. der surface of fertile leaves of some ferns. Rootstock. Rhizome. Stem. Fruit dots. Small groups of spore cases appearing on the underside of fertile leaves. Sorus. A cluster of sporangia. (Plural of Habitat. The typicalsituation under sorus is son.) which a plant grows. Sporangia. (Spore cases.) The vessels Indusium. The shield-like cover of a where spores are formed. sorus. Spore. The small nonsexual fruit of the Leaflet. One of the divisions of a com- fern. A cell that functions as a seed. pound leaf. Midvein. The central and most prominent Stipe. Leafstalk. vein of a pinna or pinnule.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Status Species List
    APPENDIX J SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES LIST SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES LIST APPENDIX J SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES LIST Common Name Scientific Name State Class Status1 A Caddisfly Farula constricta OR Insect BS Adder’s-tongue Ophioglossum pusillum OR Plant BS Agave, Arizona Agave arizonica AZ Plant FE Agave, Murphey Agave murpheyi AZ Plant BS Agave, Santa Cruz Striped Agave parviflora AZ Plant BS Agoseris, Pink Agoseris lackschewitzii ID Plant BS Albatross, Short-tailed Phoebastris albatrus AK, CA Bird FE Alkaligrass, Howell’s Puccinellia howelli CA Plant BS Alkaligrass, Lemon’s Puccinellia lemmonii CA Plant BS Alkaligrass, Parish’s Puccinellia parishii CA, MT Plant BS Alpine-aster, Tall Oreostemma elatum CA Plant BS Alpine-parsley, Trotter’s Oreoxis trotteri UT Plant BS Alumroot, Duran’s Heuchera duranii CA Plant BS Amaranth, California Amaranthus californicus MT Plant BS Ambersnail, Kanab Oxyloma haydeni kanabensis AZ, UT Snail FE Ambrosia, San Diego Ambrosia pumila CA Plant FE Chlorogalum purpureum var. Amole, Purple CA Plant FT purpureum Amphipod, Malheur Cave Stygobromus hubbsi OR Crustacean BS Amphipod, Noel’s Gammarus desperatus NM Crustacean PE Angelica, King’s Angelica kingii ID Plant BS Angelica, Rough Angelica scabrida NV Plant BS Apachebush Apacheria chircahuensis NM Plant BS Apple, Indian Peraphyllum ramosissimum ID Plant BS Arrowhead, Sanford’s Sagittaria sanfordii CA Plant BS Aster, Gorman’s Eucephalus gormanii OR Plant BS Aster, Pygmy Eurybia pygmaea AK Plant BS Aster, Red Rock Canyon Ionactis caelestis NV Plant BS Avens, Mountain Senecio moresbiensis AK Plant BS Baccharis, Encinitis Baccharis vanessae CA Plant FT Balloonvine Cardiospermum corindum AZ Plant BS Balsamorhiza macrolepis var. Balsamroot, Big-scale CA Plant BS macrolepis Balsamroot, Large-leaved Balsamorhiza macrophylla MT Plant BS Balsamroot, Silky Balsamorhiza sericea CA Plant BS Balsamroot, Woolly Balsamorhiza hookeri var.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant Inventory of Mount Rainier National Park
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Vascular Plant Inventory of Mount Rainier National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCCN/NRTR—2010/347 ON THE COVER Mount Rainier and meadow courtesy of 2007 Mount Rainier National Park Vegetation Crew Vascular Plant Inventory of Mount Rainier National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCCN/NRTR—2010/347 Regina M. Rochefort North Cascades National Park Service Complex 810 State Route 20 Sedro-Woolley, Washington 98284 June 2010 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series provides contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received informal peer review by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data.
    [Show full text]
  • FOH Newsletter 2013
    FRIENDS Of The University Of Montana HERBARIUM Spring 2013 Montana’s Special Status Plants: Thirty Years of Tracking Rare and Threatened Plants in the Treasure State By Scott Mincemoyer, Montana Natural Heritage Program 1980, the Montana Rare Plant Project, based at the tana’s plants built upon the previous work and helped to In University of Montana, was formed with the intent clarify the conservation status of many other plants based of developing the first, comprehensive listing of rare and upon additional information accumulated from field sur- threatened plants for the state (Lesica et al. 1984). Previ- veys and herbaria specimens over the previous seven ous efforts, focused on developing a list of rare plants had years. a regional or national scope, including one for the North- As early as 1987, MTNHP applied the term “Species of ern Region of the U.S. Forest Service (Inman, Hendzel, Conservation Concern” to species that previously were and Schmautz 1971) and several iterations of lists of categorized in one of the various status categories (e.g. plants under consideration for listing as threatened or en- threatened, endangered, rare) used in the preceding publi- dangered after passage of the Federal Endangered Species cations. This was later abbreviated to Species of Concern Act (ESA) in 1973. The Montana Rare Plant Project as- (SOC), terminology that is still used today for those spe- sembled information on the state’s plant species from sev- cies that meet specific criteria of rarity and/or threats to eral herbaria, including the University of Montana, Mon- their viability (MTNHP 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • CDA District EA Format
    Lynch Gulch Environmental Assessment NEPA Register Number: DOI-BLM-ID-C010-2015-0004-EA U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Coeur d’Alene Field Office 3815 Schreiber Way Coeur d’Alene, ID 83815 208-769-5000 May 2016 Lynch Gulch EA (DOI-BLM-ID-C010-2015-0004-EA) 1 Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 3 2.0 Purpose and Need: ................................................................................................... 3 3.0 BLM Decision to be Made: ........................................................................................ 4 4.0 Land Use Plan Conformance: ................................................................................... 5 5.0 Scoping and Issues ................................................................................................... 7 6.0 Alternatives ............................................................................................................... 9 7.0 Affected Environment and Environmental Effects ................................................... 12 7.1 Scope of Analysis ................................................................................................................ 12 7.2 Forest Vegetation: .............................................................................................................. 13 7.3 Vegetation Communities, including Special Status Plant Species: .................................... 16 7.4 Fuels ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Contribution a L'etude De La Synthese De L'alliine De L'ail
    CONTRIBUTION A L’ETUDE DE LA SYNTHESE DE L’ALLIINE DE L’AIL BERENICE DETHIER TRAVAIL DE FIN D’ETUDES PRESENTE EN VUE DE L’OBTENTION DU DIPLOME DE MASTER BIOINGENIEUR EN CHIMIE ET BIO-INDUSTRIES ANNEE ACADEMIQUE 2009-2010 (CO)-PROMOTEUR(S) : J.-P. WATHELET, E. HANON Toute reproduction du présent document, par quelque procédé que ce soit, ne peut être réalisée qu'avec l'autorisation de l'auteur et de l'autorité académique de Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech. Le présent document n'engage que son auteur. CONTRIBUTION A L’ETUDE DE LA SYNTHESE DE L’ALLIINE DE L’AIL BERENICE DETHIER TRAVAIL DE FIN D’ETUDES PRESENTE EN VUE DE L’OBTENTION DU DIPLOME DE MASTER BIOINGENIEUR EN CHIMIE ET BIO-INDUSTRIES ANNEE ACADEMIQUE 2009-2010 (CO)-PROMOTEUR(S) : J.-P. WATHELET, E. HANON Remerciements Au terme de ce travail, je souhaite remercier l’ensemble des personnes qui ont contribué, de près ou de loin, à son élaboration. Celui-ci représentant l’aboutissement de mes études à la Faculté, je tiens également à saluer celles et ceux qui m’ont soutenu et encadré durant ces cinq années d’études. Mes remerciements vont dès lors à mes promoteurs, Emilien Hanon pour son intérêt pour mon sujet, ses précieux conseils, son soutien continu et sa sympathie, et Monsieur Jean-Paul Wathelet pour son encadrement, son enseignement et ses remarques constructives. Je remercie également les membres de mon jury pour l’intérêt porté à cette étude. Ma reconnaissance va ensuite à l’ensemble de l’unité de Chimie Générale et Organique pour l’accueil, le soutien, les conseils avisés et la bonne humeur.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant List Lomatium Mohavense Mojave Parsley 3 3 Lomatium Nevadense Nevada Parsley 3 Var
    Scientific Name Common Name Fossil Falls Alabama Hills Mazourka Canyon Div. & Oak Creeks White Mountains Fish Slough Rock Creek McGee Creek Parker Bench East Mono Basin Tioga Pass Bodie Hills Cicuta douglasii poison parsnip 3 3 3 Cymopterus cinerarius alpine cymopterus 3 Cymopterus terebinthinus var. terebinth pteryxia 3 3 petraeus Ligusticum grayi Gray’s lovage 3 Lomatium dissectum fern-leaf 3 3 3 3 var. multifidum lomatium Lomatium foeniculaceum ssp. desert biscuitroot 3 fimbriatum Plant List Lomatium mohavense Mojave parsley 3 3 Lomatium nevadense Nevada parsley 3 var. nevadense Lomatium rigidum prickly parsley 3 Taxonomy and nomenclature in this species list are based on Lomatium torreyi Sierra biscuitroot 3 western sweet- the Jepson Manual Online as of February 2011. Changes in Osmorhiza occidentalis 3 3 ADOXACEAE–ASTERACEAE cicely taxonomy and nomenclature are ongoing. Some site lists are Perideridia bolanderi Bolander’s 3 3 more complete than others; all of them should be considered a ssp. bolanderi yampah Lemmon’s work in progress. Species not native to California are designated Perideridia lemmonii 3 yampah with an asterisk (*). Please visit the Inyo National Forest and Perideridia parishii ssp. Parish’s yampah 3 3 Bureau of Land Management Bishop Resource Area websites latifolia for periodic updates. Podistera nevadensis Sierra podistera 3 Sphenosciadium ranger’s buttons 3 3 3 3 3 capitellatum APOCYNACEAE Dogbane Apocynum spreading 3 3 androsaemifolium dogbane Scientific Name Common Name Fossil Falls Alabama Hills Mazourka Canyon Div. & Oak Creeks White Mountains Fish Slough Rock Creek McGee Creek Parker Bench East Mono Basin Tioga Pass Bodie Hills Apocynum cannabinum hemp 3 3 ADOXACEAE Muskroot Humboldt Asclepias cryptoceras 3 Sambucus nigra ssp.
    [Show full text]