Plant List As of 3/19/2008 Tanya Harvey T23S.R2E.S25, 36 *Non-Native
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Tree Species Distribution Maps for Central Oregon
APPENDIX 7: TREE SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MAPS FOR CENTRAL OREGON A7-150 Appendix 7: Tree Species Distribution Maps Table A7-5. List of distribution maps for tree species of central Oregon. The species distribution maps are prefaced by four maps (pages A7-151 through A7-154) showing all locations surveyed in each of the four major data sources Map Page Forest Inventory and Analysis plot locations A7-151 Ecology core Dataset plot locations A7-152 Current Vegetation Survey plot locations A7-153 Burke Museum Herbarium and Oregon Flora Project sample locations A7-154 Scientific name Common name Symbol Abies amabilis Pacific silver fir ABAM A7-155 Abies grandis - Abies concolor Grand fir - white fir complex ABGR-ABCO A7-156 Abies lasiocarpa Subalpine fir ABLA A7-157 Abies procera - A. x shastensis Noble fir - Shasta red fir complex ABPR-ABSH A7-158 [magnifica x procera] Acer glabrum var. douglasii Douglas maple ACGLD4 A7-159 Alnus rubra Red alder ALRU2 A7-160 Calocedrus decurrens Incense-cedar CADE27 A7-161 Chrysolepis chrysophylla Golden chinquapin CHCH7 A7-162 Frangula purshiana Cascara FRPU7 A7-163 Juniperus occidentalis Western juniper JUOC A7-164 Larix occidentalis Western larch LAOC A7-165 Picea engelmannii Engelmann spruce PIEN A7-166 Pinus albicaulis Whitebark pine PIAL A7-167 Pinus contorta var. murrayana Sierra lodgepole pine PICOM A7-168 Pinus lambertiana Sugar pine PILA A7-169 Pinus monticola Western white pine PIMO3 A7-170 Pinus ponderosa Ponderosa pine PIPO A7-171 Populus balsamifera ssp. trichocarpa Black cottonwood POBAT A7-172 -
CDA District EA Format
Lynch Gulch Environmental Assessment NEPA Register Number: DOI-BLM-ID-C010-2015-0004-EA U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Coeur d’Alene Field Office 3815 Schreiber Way Coeur d’Alene, ID 83815 208-769-5000 May 2016 Lynch Gulch EA (DOI-BLM-ID-C010-2015-0004-EA) 1 Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 3 2.0 Purpose and Need: ................................................................................................... 3 3.0 BLM Decision to be Made: ........................................................................................ 4 4.0 Land Use Plan Conformance: ................................................................................... 5 5.0 Scoping and Issues ................................................................................................... 7 6.0 Alternatives ............................................................................................................... 9 7.0 Affected Environment and Environmental Effects ................................................... 12 7.1 Scope of Analysis ................................................................................................................ 12 7.2 Forest Vegetation: .............................................................................................................. 13 7.3 Vegetation Communities, including Special Status Plant Species: .................................... 16 7.4 Fuels .................................................................................................................................. -
Ray Imaging of a Dichasium Cupule of Castanopsis from Eocene Baltic Amber
RESEARCH ARTICLE Synchrotron X- ray imaging of a dichasium cupule of Castanopsis from Eocene Baltic amber Eva-Maria Sadowski1,4 , Jörg U. Hammel2 , and Thomas Denk3 Manuscript received 30 May 2018; revision accepted 6 September PREMISE OF THE STUDY: The Eocene Baltic amber deposit represents the largest 2018. accumulation of fossil resin worldwide, and hundreds of thousands of entrapped 1 Department of Geobiology, University of Göttingen, arthropods have been recovered. Although Baltic amber preserves delicate plant Goldschmidtstraße 3, 37077 Göttingen, Germany structures in high fidelity, angiosperms of the “Baltic amber forest” remain poorly studied. 2 Institute of Materials Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, We describe a pistillate partial inflorescence of Castanopsis (Fagaceae), expanding the Max-Planck-Str. 1, 21502 Geesthacht, Germany knowledge of Fagaceae diversity from Baltic amber. 3 Department of Palaeobiology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, 10405 Stockholm, Sweden METHODS: The amber specimen was investigated using light microscopy and 4 Author for correspondence (e-mail: eva-maria.sadowski@ synchrotron- radiation- based X- ray micro- computed tomography (SRμCT). geo.uni-goettingen.de) KEY RESULTS: The partial inflorescence is a cymule, consisting of an involucre of scales Citation: Sadowski, E.-M., J. U. Hammel, and T. Denk. 2018. Synchrotron X- ray imaging of a dichasium cupule of Castanopsis that surround all four pistillate flowers, indicating a dichasium cupule. Subtending bracts from Eocene Baltic amber. American Journal of Botany 105(12): are basally covered with peltate trichomes. Flowers possess an urecolate perianth of 2025–2036. six nearly free lobes, 12 staminodia hidden by the perianth, and a tri-locular ovary that doi:10.1002/ajb2.1202 is convex- triangular in cross section. -
Developing Species-Habitat Relationships: 2016 Project Report
Field Keys to Groups and Alliances in the National Vegetation Classification: Northern Basin & Range / Columbia Plateau Ecoregions NatureServe Conservation Science Division P r i n c i p a l Investigator Patrick J. C o m e r , Chief Ecologist [email protected] 703.797.4802 November 2017 Photos (clockwise from top left; all used under Creative Commons license CC BY 2.0.): Big sage shrubland, Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest, Nevada. USDA Photo by Susan Elliot. http://flic.kr/p/ax64DY Jeffrey pine woodland, photo by David Prasad. https://www.flickr.com/photos/33671002@N00 Northwest Great Plains Mixedgrass Prairie, Dakota Prairie National Grasslands, North Dakota. Western juniper woodland, BLM Black Hills Recreation Area, Oregon. Acknowledgements This work was completed with funding provided by the Bureau of Land Management through the BLM’s Fish, Wildlife and Plant Conservation Resource Management Program under Cooperative Agreement L13AC00286 between NatureServe and the BLM. Suggested citation: Schulz, K., G. Kittel, M. Reid and P. Comer. 2017. Field Keys to Divisions, Macrogroups, Groups and Alliances in the National Vegetation Classification: Northern Basin & Range / Columbia Plateau Ecoregions. Report prepared for the Bureau of Land Management by NatureServe, Arlington VA. 14p + 58p of Keys + Appendices. See appendix document: Descriptions_NVC_Groups_Alliances_ NorthernBasinRange_Nov_2017.pdf 2 | P a g e Contents Introduction and Background ...................................................................................................................... -
Martes Pennanti) Use of a Managed Forest in Coastal Northwest California1
Fisher (Martes pennanti) Use of a Managed Forest in Coastal Northwest California1 Joel Thompson,2 Lowell Diller,2 Richard Golightly,3 and Richard Klug4 A sooted track plate survey was conducted for two seasons during winter, spring and summer of 1994 and 1995 to investigate fisher distribution across a managed landscape in Humboldt and Del Norte Counties, California. Forty survey segments were established throughout the region with each segment consisting of six sooted track plates (stations) at one-km intervals. Habitat characteristics were measured at 238 track-plate stations and in the stands where they were placed. Habitat attributes associated with fisher detection sites were compared to non-detection sites at both the station and stand level. Vegetation type was the only variable to be selected by the logistic procedure to predict fisher occurrence at the stand level. Fishers were detected more often in stands dominated by Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) or a mixture of Douglas-fir and coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) than in stands dominated only by redwood. We found no relationship between fisher detections and stand age, canopy cover, or topographic position. A forward stepwise logistic procedure indicated that presence of fishers at the station level was best predicted by increasing elevation, greater volume of logs, less basal area of conifer 52 to 90 cm, more moderate slopes and greater distance to the coast. During 1996 to 1997 a telemetry project was conducted to specifically look at vegetation and structural characteristics of fisher den and rest sites. Twenty-four individuals (10 male, 14 female) were captured during the study. -
Vegetation Descriptions NORTH COAST and MONTANE ECOLOGICAL PROVINCE
Vegetation Descriptions NORTH COAST AND MONTANE ECOLOGICAL PROVINCE CALVEG ZONE 1 December 11, 2008 Note: There are three Sections in this zone: Northern California Coast (“Coast”), Northern California Coast Ranges (“Ranges”) and Klamath Mountains (“Mountains”), each with several to many subsections CONIFER FOREST / WOODLAND DF PACIFIC DOUGLAS-FIR ALLIANCE Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) is the dominant overstory conifer over a large area in the Mountains, Coast, and Ranges Sections. This alliance has been mapped at various densities in most subsections of this zone at elevations usually below 5600 feet (1708 m). Sugar Pine (Pinus lambertiana) is a common conifer associate in some areas. Tanoak (Lithocarpus densiflorus var. densiflorus) is the most common hardwood associate on mesic sites towards the west. Along western edges of the Mountains Section, a scattered overstory of Douglas-fir often exists over a continuous Tanoak understory with occasional Madrones (Arbutus menziesii). When Douglas-fir develops a closed-crown overstory, Tanoak may occur in its shrub form (Lithocarpus densiflorus var. echinoides). Canyon Live Oak (Quercus chrysolepis) becomes an important hardwood associate on steeper or drier slopes and those underlain by shallow soils. Black Oak (Q. kelloggii) may often associate with this conifer but usually is not abundant. In addition, any of the following tree species may be sparsely present in Douglas-fir stands: Redwood (Sequoia sempervirens), Ponderosa Pine (Ps ponderosa), Incense Cedar (Calocedrus decurrens), White Fir (Abies concolor), Oregon White Oak (Q garryana), Bigleaf Maple (Acer macrophyllum), California Bay (Umbellifera californica), and Tree Chinquapin (Chrysolepis chrysophylla). The shrub understory may also be quite diverse, including Huckleberry Oak (Q. -
Vascular Plants of Santa Cruz County, California
ANNOTATED CHECKLIST of the VASCULAR PLANTS of SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SECOND EDITION Dylan Neubauer Artwork by Tim Hyland & Maps by Ben Pease CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY, SANTA CRUZ COUNTY CHAPTER Copyright © 2013 by Dylan Neubauer All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without written permission from the author. Design & Production by Dylan Neubauer Artwork by Tim Hyland Maps by Ben Pease, Pease Press Cartography (peasepress.com) Cover photos (Eschscholzia californica & Big Willow Gulch, Swanton) by Dylan Neubauer California Native Plant Society Santa Cruz County Chapter P.O. Box 1622 Santa Cruz, CA 95061 To order, please go to www.cruzcps.org For other correspondence, write to Dylan Neubauer [email protected] ISBN: 978-0-615-85493-9 Printed on recycled paper by Community Printers, Santa Cruz, CA For Tim Forsell, who appreciates the tiny ones ... Nobody sees a flower, really— it is so small— we haven’t time, and to see takes time, like to have a friend takes time. —GEORGIA O’KEEFFE CONTENTS ~ u Acknowledgments / 1 u Santa Cruz County Map / 2–3 u Introduction / 4 u Checklist Conventions / 8 u Floristic Regions Map / 12 u Checklist Format, Checklist Symbols, & Region Codes / 13 u Checklist Lycophytes / 14 Ferns / 14 Gymnosperms / 15 Nymphaeales / 16 Magnoliids / 16 Ceratophyllales / 16 Eudicots / 16 Monocots / 61 u Appendices 1. Listed Taxa / 76 2. Endemic Taxa / 78 3. Taxa Extirpated in County / 79 4. Taxa Not Currently Recognized / 80 5. Undescribed Taxa / 82 6. Most Invasive Non-native Taxa / 83 7. Rejected Taxa / 84 8. Notes / 86 u References / 152 u Index to Families & Genera / 154 u Floristic Regions Map with USGS Quad Overlay / 166 “True science teaches, above all, to doubt and be ignorant.” —MIGUEL DE UNAMUNO 1 ~ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ~ ANY THANKS TO THE GENEROUS DONORS without whom this publication would not M have been possible—and to the numerous individuals, organizations, insti- tutions, and agencies that so willingly gave of their time and expertise. -
Native Tree Mitigation List for Type II Tree Removal (Not for Sensitive Lands Mitigation)
Department of Planning and Building Services 380 A Avenue Post Office Box 369 Lake Oswego, OR 97034 503-635-0290 www.lakeoswego.city/trees Native Tree Mitigation List for Type II Tree Removal (Not for Sensitive Lands Mitigation) LOC 55: Appendix 55.02-1 Native Mitigation Tree List. LESS THAN 50 FT (15 M) HIGH NEEDLE- OR SCALE-LEAVED (CONIFERS) Baker Cypress, Modoc Cypress [Cupressus bakeri] Western Juniper [Juniperus occidentalis] Rocky Mountain Juniper [Juniperus scopulorum] Whitebark Pine [Pinus albicaulis] Knobcone Pine [Pinus attenuata] Shore Pine [Pinus contorta var. contorta] Limber Pine [Pinus flexilis] Pacific or Western Yew [Taxus brevifolia] Columbia River Willow [Salix fluviatilis] Pacific Willow [Salix lasiandra] Scouler’s Willow [Salix scouleriana] Sitka Willow [Salix sitchensis] BROAD-LEAVED (DECIDUOUS) Pacific Dogwood [Cornus nuttallii] [Note: Acceptable disease (anthracnose)-resistant cultivar substitutes: Starlight® dogwood (Cornus kousa x nuttallii ‘Starlight’) and Venus® dogwood (Cornus kousa x nuttallii ‘Venus’).] Douglas Hawthorn [Crataegus douglasii] Oregon Crabapple, Pacific Crabapple [Malus fusca] Bitter Cherry [Prunus emarginata] Cascara, Chittam, Cascara Buckthorn [Rhamnus purshiana] 50-75 FT (15-23 M) HIGH NEEDLE- OR SCALE-LEAVED (CONIFERS) Subalpine Fir, Rocky Mountain Fir [Abies lasiocarpa] Brewer Spruce [Picea breweriana] Port Orford Cedar, Lawson Falsecypress [Chamaecyparis lawsoniana] [Note: acceptable disease (Phytophthora lateralis)-resistant cultivar if no height requirement of greater than 30 ft.: Silver -
Idaho's Special Status Vascular and Nonvascular Plants Conservation Rankings
Idaho's Special Status Vascular and Nonvascular Plants Conservation Rankings 1 IDNHP Tracked Species Conservation Rankings Date USFS_ USFS_ USFS_ 2 Scientific Name Synonyms Common Name G-Rank S-Rank USFWS BLM Ranked R1 R4 R6 Abronia elliptica dwarf sand-verbena G5 S1 Feb-14 Abronia mellifera white sand-verbena G4 S1S2 Feb-16 Acorus americanus Acorus calamus var. americanus sweetflag G5 S2 Feb-16 Agastache cusickii Agastache cusickii var. parva Cusick's giant-hyssop G3G4 S2 Feb-14 Agoseris aurantiaca var. aurantiaca, Agoseris lackschewitzii pink agoseris G4 S1S2 4 S Feb-16 A. aurantiaca var. carnea Agrimonia striata roadside agrimonia G5 S1 Feb-16 Aliciella triodon Gilia triodon; G. leptomeria (in part) Coyote gilia G5 S1 Feb-20 Allenrolfea occidentalis Halostachys occidentalis iodinebush G4 S1 Feb-16 Allium aaseae Aase's Onion G2G3+ S2S3 2 Oct-11 Allium anceps Kellogg's Onion G4 S2S3 4 Feb-20 Allium columbianum Allium douglasii var. columbianum Columbia onion G3 S3 Feb-16 Allium madidum swamp onion G3 S3 S Allium tolmiei var. persimile Sevendevils Onion G4G5T3+ S3 4 S Allium validum tall swamp onion G4 S3 Allotropa virgata sugarstick G4 S3 S Amphidium californicum California amphidium moss G4 S1 Feb-16 Anacolia menziesii var. baueri Bauer's anacolia moss G4 TNR S2 Feb-20 Andreaea heinemannii Heinemann's andreaea moss G3G5 S1 Feb-14 Andromeda polifolia bog rosemary G5 S1 S Andromeda polifolia var. polifolia bog rosemary G5T5 S1 Feb-20 Anemone cylindrica long-fruit anemone G5 S1 Feb-20 Angelica kingii Great Basin angelica G4 S1 3 Mar-18 Antennaria arcuata meadow pussytoes G2 S1 Mar-18 Argemone munita ssp. -
Projected Environmental Changes in the Pnw
LEFT: Tucked up on the mountainside, this 11-tiered pagoda represents monasteries in the mountains of Japan. RIGHT: Maple leaves cover the roof of the machiai house in the tea garden. AURORA SANTIAGO is a nature and garden photographer whose work is strongly featured on the Seattle Japanese Garden website and blog. She won the People’s Choice Award during the 2017 “Autumn Reflections” juried photo exhibit at the Japanese Garden. She is also a retired RN. PROJECTED ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES IN THE PNW • Rise of between 2.7°F and 10.4°F in • However, warmer winters may fail to mean air temperature this century, with satisfy “chilling requirement” of some greatest warming occurring in summer. species (e.g. Douglas-fir)—leading to • Reduction in summer precipitation of delayed budburst and shoot growth. up to 14% by end of century. • Also, early budburst may expose plants • Increase in mean winter precipitation to potential frost damage. of up to 8% by end of century. • Early flowering may promote seed • Summer soil-water availability likely to production but also lower reproductive decline in much of region. capacity by altering synchrony between plants and their pollinators/dispersers. • This will lead to increased drought stress and reduced photosynthesis. • Elevated carbon dioxide in the air may enhance productivity and water-use • Less precipitation will fall as snow, efficiency in plants, offsetting somewhat leading to reduced snowpack accumu- the negative effects of warming. lation and duration, and subsequent impacts on dependent ecosystems. • Warming climate will likely increase disturbances from wildfires, new pests • Warming winter temperature may and diseases, and invasive species. -
South Central Oregon and Northeast California (SO) Variant Overview
United States Department of South Central Oregon and Agriculture Northeast California (SO) Forest Service Forest Management Variant Overview Service Center Forest Vegetation Simulator Fort Collins, CO 2008 Revised: June 2021 Ponderosa pine stand in Northern California (Amy Jo Krommes, FS-R6) ii South Central Oregon and Northeast California (SO) Variant Overview Forest Vegetation Simulator Authors and Contributors: The FVS staff has maintained model documentation for this variant in the form of a variant overview since its release in 1984. The original author was Gary Dixon. In 2008, the previous document was replaced with this updated variant overview. Gary Dixon, Christopher Dixon, Robert Havis, Chad Keyser, Stephanie Rebain, Erin Smith-Mateja, and Don Vandendriesche were involved with this update. Stephanie Rebain cross-checked information contained in this variant overview with the FVS source code. FVS Staff. 2008 (revised June 28, 2021). South Central Oregon and Northeast California (SO) Variant Overview – Forest Vegetation Simulator. Internal Rep. Fort Collins, CO: U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Management Service Center. 100p. iii Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction................................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Geographic Range ....................................................................................................................... 2 3.0 Control Variables ....................................................................................................................... -
Nr 222 Native Tree, Shrub, & Herbaceous Plant
NR 222 NATIVE TREE, SHRUB, & HERBACEOUS PLANT IDENTIFICATION BY RONALD L. ALVES FALL 2014 NR 222 by Ronald L. Alves Note to Students NOTE TO STUDENTS: THIS DOCUMENT IS INCOMPLETE WITH OMISSIONS, ERRORS, AND OTHER ITEMS OF INCOMPETANCY. AS YOU MAKE USE OF IT NOTE THESE TRANSGRESSIONS SO THAT THEY MAY BE CORRECTED AND YOU WILL RECEIVE A CLEAN COPY BY THE END OF TIME OR THE SEMESTER, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST!! THANKING YOU FOR ANY ASSISTANCE THAT YOU MAY GIVE, RON ALVES. Introduction This manual was initially created by Harold Whaley an MJC Agriculture and Natural Resources instruction from 1964 – 1992. The manual was designed as a resource for a native tree and shrub identification course, Natural Resources 222 that was one of the required courses for all forestry and natural resource majors at the college. The course and the supporting manual were aimed almost exclusively for forestry and related majors. In addition to NR 222 being taught by professor Whaley, it has also been taught by Homer Bowen (MJC 19xx -), Marlies Boyd (MJC 199X – present), Richard Nimphius (MJC 1980 – 2006) and currently Ron Alves (MJC 1974 – 2004). Each instructor put their own particular emphasis and style on the course but it was always oriented toward forestry students until 2006. The lack of forestry majors as a result of the Agriculture Department not having a full time forestry instructor to recruit students and articulate with industry has resulted in a transformation of the NR 222 course. The clientele not only includes forestry major, but also landscape designers, environmental horticulture majors, nursery people, environmental science majors, and people interested in transforming their home and business landscapes to a more natural venue.