DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Supplementary Information for Expanding the Utility of Sequence

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 Supplementary Information for Expanding the Utility of Sequence Supplementary Information for Expanding the utility of sequence comparisons using data from whole genomes Sean Gosselina,*, Matthew S. Fullmera,c,*, Yutian Fenga, and Johann Peter Gogartena,b Corresponding Author Johann Peter Gogarten, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, 91 North Eagleville Rd, Storrs, CT, 06268-3125, USA, Email: [email protected] Phone 1 860 486 4061 This PDF file includes: Figures S1 to S9 Tables S1 to S5 1 Figures Frankia sp. NRRL B 16219 Frankia sp. BR AAY23 1001 Frankia sp. NRRL B 16219 A. Frankia sp. Allo2 B. Frankia sp. BR AAY23 1001 Frankia sp. CcI156 Frankia sp. Allo2 Frankia sp. CcI6 Frankia sp. CcI156 Frankia sp. CgIM4 Frankia sp. CcI6 Frankia sp. Thr Frankia sp. CgIM4 Frankia sp. CcI3 Frankia sp. Thr Frankia sp. CED Franka sp. CcI3 Frankia sp. BMG5 23 Frankia sp. CED Frankia sp. BMG5 23 Frankia sp. CpI1 S FF36 Frankia sp. CpI1-P FF86 1001 Frankia sp. CpI1 S FF36 Frankia sp. ACN1ag Frankia sp. CpI1-P− FF86 1001 Frankia sp. ACN1ag Frankia sp. AvcI1 Frankia sp. AvcI1 Frankia alni ACN14A Frankia alni ACN14A Frankia sp. QA3 Frankia sp. QA3 Frankia coriariae BMG5 1 Frankia coriariae BMG5 1 Frankia sp. BMG5 30 Frankia sp. BMG5 30 Frankia symbiont of Datisca glomerata GC Content Genome Length Frankia symbiont of Datisca glomerata Frankia sp. Dg2 1e+07 Frankia sp. Dg2 Frankia sp. R43 0.700 Frankia sp. R43 Frankia sp. CcI49 8e+06 0.675 Frankia sp. CcI49 Frankia sp. 45899 Frankia sp. 45899 6e+06 Frankia sp. EUN1f ctg00163 0.650 Frankia sp. EUN1f ctg00163 Frankia sp. EI5c UG55 1001 Frankia sp. EI5c UG55 1001 Frankia elaeagni BMG5 12 Frankia elaeagni BMG5 12 Frankia sp. Cc1 17 Frankia sp. Cc1 17 Frankia sp. EAN1pec Frankia sp. EAN1pec Frankia sp. CgIS1 Frankia sp. CgIS1 Frankia discariae BCU110501 Frankia discariae BCU110501 Frankia sp. EUN1h Frankia sp. EUN1h Frankia sp. CN3 FCB 1 Frankia sp. CN3 FCB 1 Frankia sp. NRRL B 16386 Frankia sp. NRRL B 16386 Frankia sp. BMG5 36 Frankia sp. BMG5 36 Frankia sp. EuI1c Frankia sp. EuI1c Frankia sp. DC12 Frankia sp. DC12 Frankineae bacterium MT45 Frankineae bacterium MT45 Frankia sp. Iso899 Frankia sp. Iso899 Jatrophihabitans endophyticus 45627 Jatrophihabitans endophyticus 45627 Sporichthya polymorpha 43042 Sporichthya polymorpha 43042 Cryptosporangium aurantiacum DSM 46144 Cryptosporangium aurantiacum DSM 46144 Cryptosporangium arvum 44712 Cryptosporangium arvum 44712 Fig. S1. Phylogenies of the Frankiales dataset built from the tANI methodology and color coded to investigate potential biases of the method. (A) plots the length of the genome on each tip, and (B) plots the GC content of the genome on the tip. Neither A or B shows biased patterns. 2 Asticcacaulis excentricus CB48 Asticcacaulis excentricus CB48 Brevundimonas subvibrioides ATCC15264 A Brevundimonas subvibrioides ATCC15264 Phenylobacterium zucineum HLK1 Phenylobacterium zucineum HLK1 B Caulobacter sp. K31 Caulobacter sp. K31 Caulobacter segnis ATCC21756 Caulobacter segnis ATCC21756 Caulobacter vibrioides CB15 Caulobacter crescentus CB15 Caulobacter vibrioides NA1000 Caulobacter crescentus NA1000 Hyphomonas neptunium ATCC15444 Maricaulis maris MCS10 Maricaulis maris MCS10 Hyphomonas neptunium ATCC15444 Parvularcula bermudensis HTCC25033 Hirschia baltica ATCC49814 Hirschia baltica ATCC49814 Parvularcula bermudensis HTCC25033 Rhodobacterales bacterium HTCC2255 Rhodobacter capsulatus SB1003 Rhodobacteraceae bacterium HTCC2150 Rhodobacter sphaeroides KD131 Rhodobacteraceae bacterium HTCC2083 Rhodobacter sphaeroides 241 Thalassiobium sp. R2A62 Rhodobacter sphaeroides ATCC17025 Octadecabacter antarcticus 307 Oceaniovalibus guishaninsula JLT2003 Octadecabacter arcticus 238 Oceanicola granulosus HTCC2516 Loktanella koreensis 17925 Wenxinia marina DSM24838 Loktanella sediminum 28715 Loktanella pyoseonensis DSM21424 Loktanella sp. S4079 Loktanella hongkongensis DSM174922 Loktanella tamlensis 26879 Loktanella cinnabarina LL001 Loktanella litorea 29433 Jannaschia sp. CCS1 Loktanella rosea 29591 Dinoroseobacter shibae DFL12 Roseobacter sp. CCS2 Maritimbacter alkaliphilus HTCC2654 Loktanella vestfoldensis DSM16212 Oceanicola batsensis HTCC2597 Loktanella fryxellensis 16213 Oceanicola sp. S124 Loktanella atrilutea 29326 Sagittula stellata E37 Loktanella salsilacus 16199 Citreicella sp. 357 Jannaschia sp. CCS1 Pelagibaca bermudensis HTCC2601 Rhodobacter capsulatus SB1003 Citreicella sp. SE45 Rhodobacter sphaeroides ATCC17025 Roseovarius nubinhibens ISM Rhodobacter sphaeroides KD131 Roseobacter sp. AzwK3b Rhodobacter sphaeroides 241 Roseovarius sp. TM1035 Rhodobacter sphaeroides ATCC17029 Roseovarius sp. 217 Oceaniovalibus guishaninsula JLT2003 Tateyamaria sp. ANG-M1 Oceanicola granulosus HTCC2516 Roseobacter litoralis Och149 Wenxinia marina DSM24838 Roseobacter denitrificans OCh114 Loktanella pyoseonensis DSM21424 Oceanibulbus indolifex HEL-45 Loktanella cinnabarina LL001 Roseobacter sp. GAI101 Loktanella hongkongensis DSM174922 Sulfitobacter sp. EE36 Oceanicola batsensis HTCC2597 Sulfitobacter sp. NAS141 Maritimibacter alkaliphilus HTCC2654 Rhodobacterales bacterium HTCC2083 Dinoroseobacter shibae DFL12 Rhodobacterales bacterium HTCC2255 Oceanicola sp. S124 Rhodobacterales bacterium HTCC2150 Sagittula stellata E37 Thalassiobium sp. R2A62 Citreicella sp. 357 Octadecabacter arcticus 238 Citreicella sp. SE45 Octadecabacter antarcticus 307 Pelagibaca bermudensis HTCC2601 Loktanella salsilacus 16199 Roseovarius nubinhibens ISM Loktanella atriluea 29326 Roseobacter sp. AzwK3b Loktanella fryxellensis 16213 Roseovarius sp. 217 Loktanella vestfoldensis DSM16212 Roseovarius sp. TM1035 Loktanella koreensis 17925 Tateyamaria sp. ANG-M1 Loktanella sediminum 28715 Roseobacter denitrificans Och114 Loktanella litorea 29433 Roseobacter litoralis Och149 Loktanella tamlensis 26879 Oceanibulbus indolifex HEL45 Loktanella sp. S4079 Roseobacter sp. GAI101 Roseobacter sp. CCS2 Sulfitobacter sp. EE36 Loktanella rosea 29591 Sulfitobacter sp. NAS141 Sedimentitalea nanhaiensis DSM24252 Sedimentitalea nanhaiensis DSM24252 Ruegeria marina CGMCC Ruegeria marina CGMCC Rugeria pomeroyi DSS3 Ruegeria pomeroyi DSS3 Rugeria lacuscaerulensis ITI1157 Ruegeria lacuscaerulensis ITI1157 Rugeria lacuscaerulensis ITI1157S Ruegeria lacuscaerulensis ITI1157S Ruegeria sp. ANG-S4 Ruegeria atlantica CECT4292 Ruegeria atlantica CECT4293 Ruegeria halocynthiae MOLA Ruegeria halocynthiae MOLA Ruegeria sp. ANG-S4 Ruegeria sp. KLH11 Ruegeria sp. KLH11 Ruegeria sp. ANG-R Ruegeria sp. ANG-R Ruegeria conchae TW15 Ruegeria conchae TW15 Ruegeria sp. TW15 Ruegeria sp. TW15 Roseobacter sp. SK20926 Ruegeria sp. TM1040 Pseudophaeobacter arcticus DSM23566 Ruegeria mobilis F1926 Roseobacter sp.MED193 Ruegeria sp. Trich CH4B Rugeria sp. TM1040 Ruegeria sp. R11 Ruegeria sp. TrichCH4B PhaeobactergallaeciensisDSM26640 Ruegeria mobilis F1926 Phaeobacter inhibens DSM17395 Ruegeria sp. R11 Phaeobacter inhibens 2-10 Phaeobacter gallaeciensis DSM26640 Phaeobacter inhibens DSM16374 Bootstrap Phaeobacter inhibens DSM17395 Roseobacter sp. SK20926 Phaeobacter inhibens DSM16374 Pseudophaeobacter arcticus DSM23566 Support Phaeobacterinhibens 2-10 Roseobacter sp. MED193 Leisingera aquimarina DSM24565 Leisingera sp. ANG-M1 Leisingera methylohalidivorans DSM14336 Leisingera sp. ANG-Vp ≥ 90 Leisingera sp. ANG-M1 Leisingera aquimarina DSM24565 Leisingera sp. ANG-Vp Leisingera methylohalidivorans DSM14336 Leisingera caerulea DSM24564 Leisingera caeruleus DSM24564 ≥ 80 Leisingera daeponensis DSM23529 Leisingera daeponensis DSM23529 Leisingera sp. Y4I Leisingera sp. Y4I Leisingera sp. JC1 Leisingera sp. ANG-M7 ≥ 70 Leisingera sp. ANG-M7 Leisingera sp. JC1 Leisingera sp. ANG-S3 Leisingera sp. ANG-S5 Leisingera sp. ANG1 Leisingera sp. ANG-DT < 70 0.3 Leisingera sp. ANG-S 0.8 Leisingera sp. ANG-M6 Leisingera sp. ANG-DT Leisingera sp. ANG-S3 Leisingera sp. ANG-M6 Leisingera sp. ANG-S Leisingera sp. ANG-S5 Leisingera sp. ANG1 Fig. S2. Comparison of phylogenies reconstructed from the Rhodobacterales dataset. (A) The multi-gene phylogeny from Collins et al., (2015), and (B) the tANI distance based phylogeny. Both sides use bootstrapped node support on a scale from 100-0 indicated by the key. 3 Rhodobacterales_bacteriuM_HTCC2150.gbk.fna Rhodobacterales_bacteriuM_HTCC2255.gbk.fna 1.0 Hirschia_baltica_ATCC49814.gbk.fna Parvularcula_berMudensis_HTCC2503.gbk.fna Octadecabacter_antarcticus_307.gbk.fna Octadecabacter_arcticus_238.gbk.fna Roseobacter_litoralis_Och149.gbk.fna Roseobacter_denitrificans_OCh114.gbk.fna Ruegeria_conchae_TW15.fna Ruegeria_sp_TW15.gbk.fna Oceanibulbus_indolifex_HEL45.gbk.fna Roseobacter_sp_GAI101.gbk.fna Ruegeria_sp_ANG-R.gbk.fna Sulfitobacter_sp_NAS-14-1.gbk.fna ThalassiobiuM_sp_R2A62.gbk.fna HyphoMonas_neptuniuM_ATCC15444.gbk.fna Ruegeria_sp_ANG-S4.gbk.fna Sulfitobacter_sp_EE36.gbk.fna Rhodobacterales_bacteriuM_HTCC2083.gbk.fna Maricaulis_maris_MCS10.gbk.fna Ruegeria_atlantica.fna TateyaMaria_sp_ANG-M1.gbk.fna Ruegeria_sp_KLH11.gbk.fna SediMentitalea_nanhaiensis_DSM24252.gbk.fna Ruegeria_halocynthiae_MOLA.fna Rugeria_poMeroyi_DSS3.gbk.fna Ruegeria_marina_CGMCC.fna Caulobacter_crescentus_NA1000.gbk.fna Caulobacter_crescentus_CB15.gbk.fna Silicibacter_lacuscaerulensis_ITI1157.fna Caulobacter_segnis_ATCC21756.gbk.fna Caulobacter_sp_K31.gbk.fna Ruegeria_lacuscaerulensis_ITI-1157.gbk.fna Leisingera_daeponensis_DSM23529.gbk.fna PhenylobacteriuM_zucineuM_HLK1.gbk.fna Leisingera_sp_ANG1.gbk.fna Leisingera_sp_Y4I.gbk.fna Leisingera_sp_JC1.contigs.fa BrevundiMonas_subvibrioides_ATCC15264.gbk.fna Leisingera_sp_ANG-M7.gbk.fna Leisingera_caerulea_DSM24564.gbk.fna Leisingera_sp_ANG-M6.gbk.fna
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Horizontal Operon Transfer, Plasmids, and the Evolution of Photosynthesis in Rhodobacteraceae
    The ISME Journal (2018) 12:1994–2010 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-018-0150-9 ARTICLE Horizontal operon transfer, plasmids, and the evolution of photosynthesis in Rhodobacteraceae 1 2 3 4 1 Henner Brinkmann ● Markus Göker ● Michal Koblížek ● Irene Wagner-Döbler ● Jörn Petersen Received: 30 January 2018 / Revised: 23 April 2018 / Accepted: 26 April 2018 / Published online: 24 May 2018 © The Author(s) 2018. This article is published with open access Abstract The capacity for anoxygenic photosynthesis is scattered throughout the phylogeny of the Proteobacteria. Their photosynthesis genes are typically located in a so-called photosynthesis gene cluster (PGC). It is unclear (i) whether phototrophy is an ancestral trait that was frequently lost or (ii) whether it was acquired later by horizontal gene transfer. We investigated the evolution of phototrophy in 105 genome-sequenced Rhodobacteraceae and provide the first unequivocal evidence for the horizontal transfer of the PGC. The 33 concatenated core genes of the PGC formed a robust phylogenetic tree and the comparison with single-gene trees demonstrated the dominance of joint evolution. The PGC tree is, however, largely incongruent with the species tree and at least seven transfers of the PGC are required to reconcile both phylogenies. 1234567890();,: 1234567890();,: The origin of a derived branch containing the PGC of the model organism Rhodobacter capsulatus correlates with a diagnostic gene replacement of pufC by pufX. The PGC is located on plasmids in six of the analyzed genomes and its DnaA- like replication module was discovered at a conserved central position of the PGC. A scenario of plasmid-borne horizontal transfer of the PGC and its reintegration into the chromosome could explain the current distribution of phototrophy in Rhodobacteraceae.
    [Show full text]
  • Loktanella Spp. Gb03 As an Algicidal Bacterium, Isolated from the Culture of Dinoflagellate Gambierdiscus Belizeanus
    Veterinary World, EISSN: 2231-0916 RESEARCH ARTICLE Available at www.veterinaryworld.org/Vol.9/February-2016/6.pdf Open Access Loktanella spp. Gb03 as an algicidal bacterium, isolated from the culture of Dinoflagellate Gambierdiscus belizeanus Anmar Hameed Bloh1, Gires Usup2 and Asmat Ahmad1 1. School of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia; 2. School of Environmental and Natural Resources Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia. Corresponding author: Asmat Ahmad, e-mail: [email protected], AHB: [email protected], GU: [email protected] Received: 01-10-2015, Revised: 23-12-2015, Accepted: 29-12-2015, Published online: 12-02-2016 doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2016.142-146 How to cite this article: Bloh AH, Usup G, Ahmad A (2016) Loktanella spp. Gb03 as an algicidal bacterium, isolated from the culture of Dinoflagellate Gambierdiscus belizeanus, Veterinary World 9(2): 142-146. Abstract Aim: Bacteria associated with harmful algal blooms can play a crucial role in regulating algal blooms in the environment. This study aimed at isolating and identifying algicidal bacteria in Dinoflagellate culture and to determine the optimum growth requirement of the algicidal bacteria, Loktanella sp. Gb-03. Materials and Methods: The Dinoflagellate culture used in this study was supplied by Professor Gires Usup’s Laboratory, School of Environmental and Natural Resources Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia. The culture was used for the isolation of Loktanella sp., using biochemical tests, API 20 ONE kits. The fatty acid content of the isolates and the algicidal activity were further evaluated, and the phenotype was determined through the phylogenetic tree.
    [Show full text]
  • Interactions in Self-Assembled Microbial Communities Saturate with Diversity
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/347948; this version posted June 16, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. Interactions in self-assembled microbial communities saturate with diversity Xiaoqian Yu1, Martin F. Polz2*, Eric J. Alm2,3,4,5* 1. Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA 2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA 3. Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA 4. Center for Microbiome Informatics and Therapeutics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA 5. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA *Correspondence should be addressed to: E.J.A. ([email protected]) or M.F.P. ([email protected]) Abstract How the diversity of organisms competing for or sharing resources influences community production is an important question in ecology but has rarely been explored in natural microbial communities. These generally contain large numbers of species making it difficult to disentangle how the effects of different interactions scale with diversity. Here, we show that changing diversity affects measures of community function in relatively simple communities but that increasing richness beyond a threshold has little detectable effect. We generated self-assembled communities with a wide range of diversity by growth of cells from serially diluted seawater on brown algal leachate. We subsequently isolated the most abundant taxa from these communities via dilution-to-extinction in order to compare productivity functions of the entire community to those of individual taxa.
    [Show full text]
  • A059p283.Pdf
    Vol. 59: 283–293, 2010 AQUATIC MICROBIAL ECOLOGY Published online April 21 doi: 10.3354/ame01398 Aquat Microb Ecol High diversity of Rhodobacterales in the subarctic North Atlantic Ocean and gene transfer agent protein expression in isolated strains Yunyun Fu1,*, Dawne M. MacLeod1,*, Richard B. Rivkin2, Feng Chen3, Alison Buchan4, Andrew S. Lang1,** 1Department of Biology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, 232 Elizabeth Ave., St. John’s, Newfoundland A1B 3X9, Canada 2Ocean Sciences Centre, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Marine Lab Road, St. John’s, Newfoundland A1C 5S7, Canada 3Center of Marine Biotechnology, University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, 236-701 East Pratt St., Baltimore, Maryland 21202, USA 4Department of Microbiology, University of Tennessee, M409 Walters Life Sciences, Knoxville, Tennessee 37914, USA ABSTRACT: Genes encoding gene transfer agent (GTA) particles are well conserved in bacteria of the order Rhodobacterales. Members of this order are abundant in diverse marine environments, fre- quently accounting for as much as 25% of the total bacterial community. Conservation of the genes encoding GTAs allows their use as diagnostic markers of Rhodobacterales in biogeographical stud- ies. The first survey of the diversity of Rhodobacterales based on the GTA major capsid gene was con- ducted in a warm temperate estuarine ecosystem, the Chesapeake Bay, but the biogeography of Rhodobacterales has not been explored extensively. This study investigates Rhodobacterales diver- sity in the cold subarctic water near Newfoundland, Canada. Our results suggest that the subarctic region of the North Atlantic contains diverse Rhodobacterales communities in both winter and sum- mer, and that the diversity of the Rhodobacterales community in the summer Newfoundland coastal water is higher than that found in the Chesapeake Bay, in either the summer or winter.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Hierarchy of the Phylum Proteobacteria and Korean Indigenous Novel Proteobacteria Species
    Journal of Species Research 8(2):197-214, 2019 Taxonomic hierarchy of the phylum Proteobacteria and Korean indigenous novel Proteobacteria species Chi Nam Seong1,*, Mi Sun Kim1, Joo Won Kang1 and Hee-Moon Park2 1Department of Biology, College of Life Science and Natural Resources, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Republic of Korea 2Department of Microbiology & Molecular Biology, College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Republic of Korea *Correspondent: [email protected] The taxonomic hierarchy of the phylum Proteobacteria was assessed, after which the isolation and classification state of Proteobacteria species with valid names for Korean indigenous isolates were studied. The hierarchical taxonomic system of the phylum Proteobacteria began in 1809 when the genus Polyangium was first reported and has been generally adopted from 2001 based on the road map of Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Until February 2018, the phylum Proteobacteria consisted of eight classes, 44 orders, 120 families, and more than 1,000 genera. Proteobacteria species isolated from various environments in Korea have been reported since 1999, and 644 species have been approved as of February 2018. In this study, all novel Proteobacteria species from Korean environments were affiliated with four classes, 25 orders, 65 families, and 261 genera. A total of 304 species belonged to the class Alphaproteobacteria, 257 species to the class Gammaproteobacteria, 82 species to the class Betaproteobacteria, and one species to the class Epsilonproteobacteria. The predominant orders were Rhodobacterales, Sphingomonadales, Burkholderiales, Lysobacterales and Alteromonadales. The most diverse and greatest number of novel Proteobacteria species were isolated from marine environments. Proteobacteria species were isolated from the whole territory of Korea, with especially large numbers from the regions of Chungnam/Daejeon, Gyeonggi/Seoul/Incheon, and Jeonnam/Gwangju.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 1 Bacterial Diversity In
    miii UNIVERSITEIT GENT Faculteit Wetenschappen Laboratorium voor Microbiologie Biodiversity of bacterial isolates from Antarctic lakes and polar seas Stefanie Van Trappen Scriptie voorgelegd tot het behalen van de graad van Doctor in de Wetenschappen (Biotechnologie) Promotor: Prof. Dr. ir. J. Swings Academiejaar 2003-2004 ‘If Antarctica were music it would be Mozart. Art, and it would be Michelangelo. Literature, and it would be Shakespeare. And yet it is something even greater; the only place on earth that is still as it should be. May we never tame it.’ Andrew Denton Dankwoord Doctoreren doe je niet alleen en in dit deel wens ik dan ook de vele mensen te bedanken die dit onvergetelÿke avontuur mogelÿk hebben gemaakt. Al van in de 2 de licentie werd ik tijdens het practicum gebeten door de 'microbiologie microbe' en Joris & Ben maakten mij wegwijs in de wondere wereld van petriplaten, autoclaveren, enten en schuine agarbuizen. Het kwaad was geschied en ik besloot dan ook mijn thesis te doen op het labo microbiologie. Met de steun van Paul, Peter & Tom worstelde ik mij door de uitgebreide literatuur over Burkholderia en aanverwanten en er kon een nieuw species beschreven worden, Burkholderia ambifaria. Nu had ik de smaak pas goed te pakken en toen Joris met een voorstel om te doctoreren op de proppen kwam, moest ik niet lang nadenken. En in de voetsporen tredend van A. de Gerlache, kon ik aan de ontdekkingstocht van ijskoude poolzeeën en Antarctische meren beginnen... Jean was hierbij een uitstekende gids: bedankt voor je vertrouwen en steun. Naast de kritische opmerkingen en verbeteringen, gafje mij ook voldoende vrijheid om deze reis tot een goed einde te brengen.
    [Show full text]
  • CGM-18-001 Perseus Report Update Bacterial Taxonomy Final Errata
    report Update of the bacterial taxonomy in the classification lists of COGEM July 2018 COGEM Report CGM 2018-04 Patrick L.J. RÜDELSHEIM & Pascale VAN ROOIJ PERSEUS BVBA Ordering information COGEM report No CGM 2018-04 E-mail: [email protected] Phone: +31-30-274 2777 Postal address: Netherlands Commission on Genetic Modification (COGEM), P.O. Box 578, 3720 AN Bilthoven, The Netherlands Internet Download as pdf-file: http://www.cogem.net → publications → research reports When ordering this report (free of charge), please mention title and number. Advisory Committee The authors gratefully acknowledge the members of the Advisory Committee for the valuable discussions and patience. Chair: Prof. dr. J.P.M. van Putten (Chair of the Medical Veterinary subcommittee of COGEM, Utrecht University) Members: Prof. dr. J.E. Degener (Member of the Medical Veterinary subcommittee of COGEM, University Medical Centre Groningen) Prof. dr. ir. J.D. van Elsas (Member of the Agriculture subcommittee of COGEM, University of Groningen) Dr. Lisette van der Knaap (COGEM-secretariat) Astrid Schulting (COGEM-secretariat) Disclaimer This report was commissioned by COGEM. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors and may in no way be taken to represent the views of COGEM. Dit rapport is samengesteld in opdracht van de COGEM. De meningen die in het rapport worden weergegeven, zijn die van de auteurs en weerspiegelen niet noodzakelijkerwijs de mening van de COGEM. 2 | 24 Foreword COGEM advises the Dutch government on classifications of bacteria, and publishes listings of pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria that are updated regularly. These lists of bacteria originate from 2011, when COGEM petitioned a research project to evaluate the classifications of bacteria in the former GMO regulation and to supplement this list with bacteria that have been classified by other governmental organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1. Validly Published Names, Conserved and Rejected Names, And
    Appendix 1. Validly published names, conserved and rejected names, and taxonomic opinions cited in the International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology since publication of Volume 2 of the Second Edition of the Systematics* JEAN P. EUZÉBY New phyla Alteromonadales Bowman and McMeekin 2005, 2235VP – Valid publication: Validation List no. 106 – Effective publication: Names above the rank of class are not covered by the Rules of Bowman and McMeekin (2005) the Bacteriological Code (1990 Revision), and the names of phyla are not to be regarded as having been validly published. These Anaerolineales Yamada et al. 2006, 1338VP names are listed for completeness. Bdellovibrionales Garrity et al. 2006, 1VP – Valid publication: Lentisphaerae Cho et al. 2004 – Valid publication: Validation List Validation List no. 107 – Effective publication: Garrity et al. no. 98 – Effective publication: J.C. Cho et al. (2004) (2005xxxvi) Proteobacteria Garrity et al. 2005 – Valid publication: Validation Burkholderiales Garrity et al. 2006, 1VP – Valid publication: Vali- List no. 106 – Effective publication: Garrity et al. (2005i) dation List no. 107 – Effective publication: Garrity et al. (2005xxiii) New classes Caldilineales Yamada et al. 2006, 1339VP VP Alphaproteobacteria Garrity et al. 2006, 1 – Valid publication: Campylobacterales Garrity et al. 2006, 1VP – Valid publication: Validation List no. 107 – Effective publication: Garrity et al. Validation List no. 107 – Effective publication: Garrity et al. (2005xv) (2005xxxixi) VP Anaerolineae Yamada et al. 2006, 1336 Cardiobacteriales Garrity et al. 2005, 2235VP – Valid publica- Betaproteobacteria Garrity et al. 2006, 1VP – Valid publication: tion: Validation List no. 106 – Effective publication: Garrity Validation List no. 107 – Effective publication: Garrity et al.
    [Show full text]
  • (ST). the Table
    1 SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS Growth Media Modern Condition Seawater Freshwater Light T°C Atmosphere AMCONA medium BG11 medium – Synechococcus – – Synechocystis – [C] in PAL [C] in the [C] in the Gas Nutrients Modern Nutrients (ppm) Medium Medium Ocean NaNO3 CO2 ~407.8 Na2SO4 25.0mM 29mM Nitrogen 50 Standard (17.65mM) μmol (ST) NaNO NaNO 20°C O ~209’460 Nitrogen 3 3 MgSO 0.304mM photon 2 (549µM) (13.7µM) 4 /m2s FeCl3 6.56µM 2nM Ammonium 0.6g/L ZnSO 254nM 0.5nM ferric stock N ~780’790 4 2 citrate (10ml NaMoO 105nM 105nM 4 green stock/1L) 2 Table S 1 Description of the experimental condition defined as Standard Condition (ST). The table 3 shows the concentrations of fundamental elements, such as C, N, S, and Fe used for the AMCONA 4 seawater medium (Fanesi et al., 2014) and BG11 freshwater medium (Stanier et al., 1971) flushing air 5 with using air pump (KEDSUM-310 8W pump; Xiolan, China) Growth Media Possible Proterozoic T° Condition Modified Seawater Modified Freshwater Light Atmosphere AMCONA medium BG11 medium C – Synechococcus – – Synechocystis – [C] in [C] in PPr Nutrients PPr Nutrients Medium Gas ppm Medium NH Cl Na SO 3mM Nitrogen 4 3 2 4 (0.0035mM) CO 2 10’000ppm (20%) NH Cl Possible (~ 2’450% Nitrogen 4 3 MgSO 0.035mM 50 with 20ml/ (100µM) 4 Proterozoic PAL) μmol 20° min (PPr) photon C O2 20’000ppm /m2s (in Air) (~ 10% FeCl 200nM with 5ml/ 3 PAL) Ammonium 0.6g/L stock min ferric 10ml N ZnSO 0.0nM 2 4 citrate green stock/1L (100%) Base gas with NaMoO4 10.5nM 200ml/min 6 Table S 2 Description of the experimental condition defined as Possible Proterozoic Condition (PPr).
    [Show full text]
  • Genome Sequence of the Pink–Pigmented Marine
    Lau et al. Standards in Genomic Sciences (2015) 10:51 DOI 10.1186/s40793-015-0050-9 SHORT GENOME REPORT Open Access Genome sequence of the pink–pigmented marine bacterium Loktanella hongkongensis type strain (UST950701–009PT), a representative of the Roseobacter group Stanley CK Lau1, Thomas Riedel2, Anne Fiebig3, James Han4, Marcel Huntemann4, Jörn Petersen2, Natalia N. Ivanova4, Victor Markowitz5, Tanja Woyke4, Markus Göker2*, Nikos C. Kyrpides4, Hans-Peter Klenk2 and Pei-Yuan Qian1 Abstract Loktanella hongkongensis UST950701-009PT is a Gram-negative, non-motile and rod-shaped bacterium isolated from a marine biofilm in the subtropical seawater of Hong Kong. When growing as a monospecies biofilm on polystyrene surfaces, this bacterium is able to induce larval settlement and metamorphosis of a ubiquitous polychaete tubeworm Hydroides elegans. The inductive cues are low-molecular weight compounds bound to the exopolymeric matrix of the bacterial cells. In the present study we describe the features of L. hongkongensis strain DSM 17492T together with its genome sequence and annotation and novel aspects of its phenotype. The 3,198,444 bp long genome sequence encodes 3104 protein-coding genes and 57 RNA genes. The two unambiguously identified extrachromosomal replicons contain replication modules of the RepB and the Rhodobacteraceae-specific DnaA-like type, respectively. Keywords: Biofilms, Marine, Roseobacter group, Rhodobacteraceae, Alphaproteobacteria, Plasmids Introduction the genome sequencing, an annotation and a summary Loktanella hongkongensis UST950701-00PT (= DSM classification together with a set of features for strain, 17492T = NRRL B-41039T = JCM 12479T) was isolated including novel aspects of its phenotype. from a biofilm grown naturally on a glass coupon that had been submerged in the coastal seawater of Hong Organism information Kong for 7 days in July 1995 [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Summer Marine Bacterial Community Composition of the Western Antarctic Peninsula
    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Master's Projects Master's Theses and Graduate Research Spring 5-26-2021 Summer Marine Bacterial Community Composition of the Western Antarctic Peninsula Codey Phoun Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_projects Part of the Bioinformatics Commons SUMMER MARINE BACTERIAL COMMUNITY COMPOSITION OF THE WESTERN ANTARCTIC PENINSULA Summer Marine Bacterial Community Composition of the Western Antarctic Peninsula A Project Presented to the Department of Computer Science San José State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science By Codey Phoun May 2021 SUMMER MARINE BACTERIAL COMMUNITY COMPOSITION OF THE WESTERN ANTARCTIC PENINSULA ABSTRACT The Western Antarctic Peninsula has experienced dramatic warming due to climate change over the last 50 years and the consequences to the marine microbial community are not fully clear. The marine bacterial community are fundamental contributors to biogeochemical cycling of nutrients and minerals in the ocean. Molecular data of bacteria from the surface waters of the Western Antarctic Peninsula are lacking and most existing studies do not capture the annual variation of bacterial community dynamics. In this study, 15 different 16S rRNA gene amplicon samples covering 3 austral summers were processed and analyzed to investigate the marine bacterial community composition and its changes over the summer season. Between the 3 summer seasons, a similar pattern of dominance in relative community composition by the classes of Alphaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, and Bacteroidetes was observed. Alphaproteobacteria were mainly composed of the order Rhodobacterales and increased in relative abundance as the summer progressed. Gammaproteobacteria were represented by a wide array of taxa at the order level.
    [Show full text]
  • Putative Degraders of Low‐Density Polyethylene‐Derived Compounds
    Environmental Microbiology (2020) 22(11), 4779–4793 doi:10.1111/1462-2920.15232 Putative degraders of low-density polyethylene-derived compounds are ubiquitous members of plastic- associated bacterial communities in the marine environment Maria Pinto ,1,2* Paula Polania Zenner,1 classified as Roseobacter, Pseudophaeobacter, Teresa M. Langer,1 Jesse Harrison,3† Phaeobacter, Marinovum and Cognatiyoonia,also Meinhard Simon ,4 Marta M. Varela5 and enriched in the LDPE-laboratory incubations, were Gerhard J. Herndl1,2,6 enriched on LDPE communities compared to the ones 1Department of Functional and Evolutionary Ecology, associated to glass and polypropylene in in-situ incuba- University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. tions in the northern Adriatic Sea after 1 month of incu- 2Research Platform ‘Plastics in the Environment and bation. Some of these enriched OTUs were also related Society’, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. to known alkane and hydrocarbon degraders. Collec- 3Centre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems tively, these results demonstrate that there are prokary- Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. otes capable of surviving with LDPE as the sole carbon 4Institute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine source living on plastics in relatively high abundances Environment (ICBM), University of Oldenburg, in different water masses of the global ocean. Oldenburg, Germany. 5IEO, Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Centro Introduction Oceanográfico de A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain. Between 4.8 and 12.7 million metric tons of plastic are 6NIOZ, Department of Marine Microbiology and entering the ocean each year (Jambeck et al., 2015). Biogeochemistry, Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Like all solid surfaces in the ocean, plastics are colonized Research, Utrecht University, Den Burg, The by microbial communities referred to as the plastisphere Netherlands.
    [Show full text]