DOCSLIB.ORG

CGM-18-001 Perseus Report Update Bacterial Taxonomy Final Errata

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CGM-18-001 Perseus Report Update Bacterial Taxonomy Final Errata report Update of the bacterial taxonomy in the classification lists of COGEM July 2018 COGEM Report CGM 2018-04 Patrick L.J. RÜDELSHEIM & Pascale VAN ROOIJ PERSEUS BVBA Ordering information COGEM report No CGM 2018-04 E-mail: [email protected] Phone: +31-30-274 2777 Postal address: Netherlands Commission on Genetic Modification (COGEM), P.O. Box 578, 3720 AN Bilthoven, The Netherlands Internet Download as pdf-file: http://www.cogem.net → publications → research reports When ordering this report (free of charge), please mention title and number. Advisory Committee The authors gratefully acknowledge the members of the Advisory Committee for the valuable discussions and patience. Chair: Prof. dr. J.P.M. van Putten (Chair of the Medical Veterinary subcommittee of COGEM, Utrecht University) Members: Prof. dr. J.E. Degener (Member of the Medical Veterinary subcommittee of COGEM, University Medical Centre Groningen) Prof. dr. ir. J.D. van Elsas (Member of the Agriculture subcommittee of COGEM, University of Groningen) Dr. Lisette van der Knaap (COGEM-secretariat) Astrid Schulting (COGEM-secretariat) Disclaimer This report was commissioned by COGEM. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors and may in no way be taken to represent the views of COGEM. Dit rapport is samengesteld in opdracht van de COGEM. De meningen die in het rapport worden weergegeven, zijn die van de auteurs en weerspiegelen niet noodzakelijkerwijs de mening van de COGEM. 2 | 24 Foreword COGEM advises the Dutch government on classifications of bacteria, and publishes listings of pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria that are updated regularly. These lists of bacteria originate from 2011, when COGEM petitioned a research project to evaluate the classifications of bacteria in the former GMO regulation and to supplement this list with bacteria that have been classified by other governmental organizations. The resulting pathogenicity classification lists have subsequently been updated in 2013, 2014 and 2017 with new bacterial species that have been classified. Over the years, the bacterial taxonomy has been subjected to many revisions mainly due to developments in sequencing technology. In the 2017 update of the bacterial pathogenicity classifications, COGEM stated that new insights in taxonomy have not yet been processed in the COGEM listings, and that a taxonomic revision of the list would be conducted at a later stage. The present report builds upon this advice, and contains a thorough taxonomic revision of the lists of pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria. The research has been performed by dr. Pascale van Rooij and dr. Patrick Rüdelsheim, who have diligently and meticulously gone through the lists of over 2,000 bacterial species and genera to document any inconsistencies with the current taxonomy. A variety of sources and databases have been accessed and any typographic errors and reclassifications were registered. This research also proves that taxonomic revisions can be ambiguous, and in some cases no consensus is reached on the official nomenclature. Differences between databases can further complicate decisions about naming. In case of such uncertainties, the authors have provided detailed information to facilitate the final decision making by COGEM. Taxonomy is an ever changing field; phenotypic characteristics are no longer the sole defining properties and development of novel molecular techniques creates new insights into the bacterial phylogeny. The supervisory committee is pleased with the research report, and the cooperation was prosperous. The authors have provided an extensive and detailed description of taxonomic changes, which serves as a valuable contribution to the COGEM as a knowledge base of phylogeny and for revision of the pathogenicity classification lists. Prof. dr. J.P.M. van Putten Chair of the Advisory Committee Chair of the Medical Veterinary subcommittee of COGEM 3 | 24 Summary A taxonomic review was performed encompassing all pathogenic and apathogenic bacteria listed in the classification lists of COGEM. This report identifies a substantial amount of cases for which a name change should be considered: 294 out of 1360 studied pathogenic taxa and 192 out of 976 apathogenic taxa. The main rationale for a proposed name change was either a typographical correction of a genus name or epithet, or a reclassification due to new insights into bacterial taxonomy. The report identifies several taxa for which one or more synonyms are being used, due to lack of consensus among bacteriologists about the naming, or because no official authority has as yet indicated the correct name. Furthermore, a limited number of taxa remains with an uncertain nomenclature due to lack of scientific information that would enable proper revision or rigid classification. All nomenclatural changes, proposals for amendment and ambiguities are documented in detail in order to allow final decision-making by the COGEM (Annexes 1a-h and 2a-h). Revised listings of apathogenic and pathogenic bacteria are proposed in Annexes 3 and 4. Finally, some observations on risk classifications are documented. 4 | 24 Samenvatting Een taxonomische doorlichting werd uitgevoerd van alle pathogene en apathogene bacteriën die zijn opgenomen in de classificatielijsten van de COGEM. Dit rapport identificeert een aanzienlijk aantal gevallen waarvoor een naamsverandering dient in overweging te worden genomen: 294 van de 1360 bestudeerde pathogene taxa, en 192 van de 976 apathogene taxa. De voornaamste onderliggende redenen om een naamswijziging voor te stellen zijn ofwel een typografische correctie van een genusnaam of epitheton, of een herclassificatie door een nieuw inzicht in de bacteriële taxonomie. Het rapport identificeert verschillende taxa waarvoor één of meerdere synoniemen in gebruik zijn door een gebrek aan eensgezindheid onder bacteriologen over de naamgeving, of doordat geen officiële autoriteit een formeel besluit neemt over welke de correcte naam moet zijn. Daarnaast zijn er verschillende taxa met een onzekere naamgeving waarvoor de nodige wetenschappelijke informatie ontbreekt voor een grondige herziening of herindeling. Alle naamswijzigingen, voorstellen tot wijziging en onduidelijkheden worden uitvoerig gedocumenteerd om tot een vlotte besluitvorming te komen met de COGEM (Annexen 1a-h en 2a-h). Herziene lijsten van apathogene en pathogene bacteria worden voorgesteld in Annexen 3 en 4. Tot slot, documenteert dit rapport een aantal vaststellingen in verband met de pathogeniteitsclassificatie. 5 | 24 Table of contents FOREWORD ................................................................................................................................... 3 SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................... 4 SAMENVATTING ............................................................................................................................ 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................................. 6 ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS ................................................................................................ 7 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 9 1 PURPOSE OF THE STUDY ...................................................................................................... 9 2 METHODS ................................................................................................................................. 9 3 RESULTS ................................................................................................................................ 13 3.1 PATHOGENIC BACTERIA .......................................................................................................... 13 3.1.1 TAXA WITHOUT NAME CHANGE (ANNEX 1A) ........................................................................... 13 3.1.2 TAXA TO BE DELETED AND/OR TRANSFERRED TO OTHER COGEM-LISTINGS (ANNEX 1B) ........ 13 3.1.3 TAXA WITH CORRECTED NAMES (ANNEX 1C) ......................................................................... 13 3.1.4 TAXA WITH TAXONOMIC CHANGES (ANNEXES 1D-G) .............................................................. 14 3.1.5 TAXA WITH UNCERTAIN NOMENCLATURE (ANNEX 1H) ............................................................ 15 3.1.6 OBSERVATIONS ON RISK CLASSIFICATIONS ........................................................................... 15 3.2 APATHOGENIC BACTERIA ........................................................................................................ 16 3.2.1 TAXA WITHOUT NAME CHANGE (ANNEX 2A) .......................................................................... 16 3.2.2 TAXA WITH CORRECTED NAMES (ANNEX 2B) ......................................................................... 16 3.2.3 TAXA WITH TAXONOMIC CHANGES (ANNEXES 2C-G) .............................................................. 16 3.2.4 TAXA WITH UNCERTAIN NOMENCLATURE (ANNEX 2H) ............................................................ 17 3.2.5 OBSERVATIONS ON RISK CLASSIFICATIONS ........................................................................... 17 4 DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................ 18 5 REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Metaproteogenomic Insights Beyond Bacterial Response to Naphthalene
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE ISME Journal – Original article Metaproteogenomic insights beyond bacterial response to 5 naphthalene exposure and bio-stimulation María-Eugenia Guazzaroni, Florian-Alexander Herbst, Iván Lores, Javier Tamames, Ana Isabel Peláez, Nieves López-Cortés, María Alcaide, Mercedes V. del Pozo, José María Vieites, Martin von Bergen, José Luis R. Gallego, Rafael Bargiela, Arantxa López-López, Dietmar H. Pieper, Ramón Rosselló-Móra, Jesús Sánchez, Jana Seifert and Manuel Ferrer 10 Supporting Online Material includes Text (Supporting Materials and Methods) Tables S1 to S9 Figures S1 to S7 1 SUPPORTING TEXT Supporting Materials and Methods Soil characterisation Soil pH was measured in a suspension of soil and water (1:2.5) with a glass electrode, and 5 electrical conductivity was measured in the same extract (diluted 1:5). Primary soil characteristics were determined using standard techniques, such as dichromate oxidation (organic matter content), the Kjeldahl method (nitrogen content), the Olsen method (phosphorus content) and a Bernard calcimeter (carbonate content). The Bouyoucos Densimetry method was used to establish textural data. Exchangeable cations (Ca, Mg, K and 10 Na) extracted with 1 M NH 4Cl and exchangeable aluminium extracted with 1 M KCl were determined using atomic absorption/emission spectrophotometry with an AA200 PerkinElmer analyser. The effective cation exchange capacity (ECEC) was calculated as the sum of the values of the last two measurements (sum of the exchangeable cations and the exchangeable Al). Analyses were performed immediately after sampling. 15 Hydrocarbon analysis Extraction (5 g of sample N and Nbs) was performed with dichloromethane:acetone (1:1) using a Soxtherm extraction apparatus (Gerhardt GmbH & Co.
    [Show full text]
  • BD-CS-057, REV 0 | AUGUST 2017 | Page 1
    EXPLIFY RESPIRATORY PATHOGENS BY NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING Limitations Negative results do not rule out viral, bacterial, or fungal infections. Targeted, PCR-based tests are generally more sensitive and are preferred when specific pathogens are suspected, especially for DNA viruses (Adenovirus, CMV, HHV6, HSV, and VZV), mycobacteria, and fungi. The analytical sensitivity of this test depends on the cellularity of the sample and the concentration of all microbes present. Analytical sensitivity is assessed using Internal Controls that are added to each sample. Sequencing data for Internal Controls is quantified. Samples with Internal Control values below the validated minimum may have reduced analytical sensitivity or contain inhibitors and are reported as ‘Reduced Analytical Sensitivity’. Additional respiratory pathogens to those reported cannot be excluded in samples with ‘Reduced Analytical Sensitivity’. Due to the complexity of next generation sequencing methodologies, there may be a risk of false-positive results. Contamination with organisms from the upper respiratory tract during specimen collection can also occur. The detection of viral, bacterial, and fungal nucleic acid does not imply organisms causing invasive infection. Results from this test need to be interpreted in conjunction with the clinical history, results of other laboratory tests, epidemiologic information, and other available data. Confirmation of positive results by an alternate method may be indicated in select cases. Validated Organisms BACTERIA Achromobacter
    [Show full text]
  • Lpr0050 and Lpr0024 in Legionella Pneumophila
    Characterization of the role of the small regulatory RNA (sRNAs) lpr0050 and lpr0024 in Legionella pneumophila Malak Sadek Natural Resource Sciences Department McGill University Montreal, Canada Supervisor: Prof. Sébastien P. Faucher June , 2019 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Science © Malak Sadek 2019 1 Abstract Legionella pneumophila is a facultative intracellular pathogen, and it is the causative agent of Legionnaires’ disease, a life-threatening form of pneumonia. L. pneumophila is commonly found in most water systems including freshwater bodies, rivers, and lakes as well as in engineered water systems and man-made water distribution systems such as cooling towers. Free-living amoeba in aquatic environments are the primary reservoir of L. pneumophila. Following inhalation of contaminated water droplets by humans, L. pneumophila infects and replicates within lung alveolar macrophages and potentially causes Legionnaires’ disease (LD) in susceptible individuals. The bacterium establishes its intracellular niche by forming the Legionella-containing vacuoles (LCVs). L. pneumophila governs the formation of the LCV and intracellular growth through the Icm/Dot type IVB secretion system. Icm/Dot is able to translocate around 300 protein effectors in the host cell allowing L. pneumophila to modulate many signalling and metabolic pathways of the host to its benefit. It is believed that Small Regulatory RNAs (sRNAs) are major players of regulation of virulence-related genes in L. pneumophila. We investigated the regulatory role of the two sRNA Lpr0050 and Lpr0024. Lpr0050 is encoded on the complementary strand of the effector SdeA. Using northern blot we showed that the cis-encoded sRNALpr0050 is expressed in the Exponential (E) phase and Post-Exponential (PE) phase in the wild-type, ΔcpxR and ΔletS.
    [Show full text]
  • Legionella Shows a Diverse Secondary Metabolism Dependent on a Broad Spectrum Sfp-Type Phosphopantetheinyl Transferase
    Legionella shows a diverse secondary metabolism dependent on a broad spectrum Sfp-type phosphopantetheinyl transferase Nicholas J. Tobias1, Tilman Ahrendt1, Ursula Schell2, Melissa Miltenberger1, Hubert Hilbi2,3 and Helge B. Bode1,4 1 Fachbereich Biowissenschaften, Merck Stiftungsprofessur fu¨r Molekulare Biotechnologie, Goethe Universita¨t, Frankfurt am Main, Germany 2 Max von Pettenkofer Institute, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universita¨tMu¨nchen, Munich, Germany 3 Institute of Medical Microbiology, University of Zu¨rich, Zu¨rich, Switzerland 4 Buchmann Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Goethe Universita¨t, Frankfurt am Main, Germany ABSTRACT Several members of the genus Legionella cause Legionnaires’ disease, a potentially debilitating form of pneumonia. Studies frequently focus on the abundant number of virulence factors present in this genus. However, what is often overlooked is the role of secondary metabolites from Legionella. Following whole genome sequencing, we assembled and annotated the Legionella parisiensis DSM 19216 genome. Together with 14 other members of the Legionella, we performed comparative genomics and analysed the secondary metabolite potential of each strain. We found that Legionella contains a huge variety of biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) that are potentially making a significant number of novel natural products with undefined function. Surprisingly, only a single Sfp-like phosphopantetheinyl transferase is found in all Legionella strains analyzed that might be responsible for the activation of all carrier proteins in primary (fatty acid biosynthesis) and secondary metabolism (polyketide and non-ribosomal peptide synthesis). Using conserved active site motifs, we predict Submitted 29 June 2016 some novel compounds that are probably involved in cell-cell communication, Accepted 25 October 2016 Published 24 November 2016 differing to known communication systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Virulence Determinants, Drug Resistance and Mobile Genetic
    Lau et al. Cell & Bioscience 2011, 1:17 http://www.cellandbioscience.com/content/1/1/17 Cell & Bioscience RESEARCH Open Access Virulence determinants, drug resistance and mobile genetic elements of Laribacter hongkongensis: a genome-wide analysis Susanna KP Lau1,2,3,4*†, Gilman KM Wong4†, Alan KL Tsang4†, Jade LL Teng4, Rachel YY Fan4, Herman Tse1,2,3,4, Kwok-Yung Yuen1,2,3,4 and Patrick CY Woo1,2,3,4* Abstract Background: Laribacter hongkongensis is associated with community-acquired gastroenteritis and traveler’s diarrhea. In this study, we performed an in-depth annotation of the genes in its genome related to the various steps in the infective process, drug resistance and mobile genetic elements. Results: For acid and bile resistance, L. hongkongensis possessed a urease gene cassette, two arc gene clusters and bile salt efflux systems. For intestinal colonization, it possessed a putative adhesin of the autotransporter family homologous to those of diffusely adherent Escherichia coli (E. coli) and enterotoxigenic E. coli. To evade from host defense, it possessed superoxide dismutase and catalases. For lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis, it possessed the same set of genes that encode enzymes for synthesizing lipid A, two Kdo units and heptose units as E. coli, but different genes for its symmetrical acylation pattern, and nine genes for polysaccharide side chains biosynthesis. It contained a number of CDSs that encode putative cell surface acting (RTX toxin and hemolysins) and intracellular cytotoxins (patatin-like proteins) and enzymes for invasion (outer membrane phospholipase A). It contained a broad variety of antibiotic resistance-related genes, including genes related to b-lactam (n = 10) and multidrug efflux (n = 54).
    [Show full text]
  • Choline Supplementation Sensitizes Legionella Dumoffii to Galleria
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article Choline Supplementation Sensitizes Legionella dumoffii to Galleria mellonella Apolipophorin III 1, , 2, 3 Marta Palusi ´nska-Szysz * y , Agnieszka Zdybicka-Barabas y , Rafał Luchowski , Emilia Reszczy ´nska 4, Justyna Smiałek´ 5 , Paweł Mak 5 , Wiesław I. Gruszecki 3 and Małgorzata Cytry ´nska 2 1 Department of Genetics and Microbiology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, Akademicka St. 19, 20-033 Lublin, Poland 2 Department of Immunobiology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, Akademicka St. 19, 20-033 Lublin, Poland; [email protected] (A.Z.-B.); [email protected] (M.C.) 3 Department of Biophysics, Institute of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Computer Science, Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, Maria Curie-Sklodowska Square 1, 20-031 Lublin, Poland; [email protected] (R.L.); [email protected] (W.I.G.) 4 Department of Plant Physiology and Biophysics, Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, Akademicka St. 19, 20-033 Lublin, Poland; [email protected] 5 Department of Analytical Biochemistry, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 7 St., 30-387 Krakow, Poland; [email protected] (J.S.);´ [email protected] (P.M.) * Correspondence: [email protected] These authors contributed equally to the work. y Received: 15 June 2020; Accepted: 11 August 2020; Published: 13 August 2020 Abstract: The growth of Legionella dumoffii can be inhibited by Galleria mellonella apolipophorin III (apoLp-III) which is an insect homologue of human apolipoprotein E., and choline-cultured L.
    [Show full text]
  • Decision Summary
    510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY A. 510(k) Number: K181324 B. Purpose for Submission: To obtain a substantial equivalence determination for the FilmArray Pneumonia Panel plus C. Measurands: Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-baumannii complex, Enterobacter cloacae complex, Escherichia coli, Haemophilus influenzae, Klebsiella aerogenes, Klebsiella oxytoca, Klebsiella pneumoniae group, Moraxella catarrhalis, Proteus spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Serratia marcescens, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Adenovirus, Coronavirus, Human Metapneumovirus, Human Rhinovirus/Enterovirus, Influenza A, Influenza B, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV), Parainfluenza Virus, Respiratory Syncytial Virus, CTX-M, IMP, KPC, NDM, OXA-48-like, VIM, mecA/C and MREJ. D. Type of Test: Qualitative and quantitative nucleic acid amplification assay E. Applicant: BioFire Diagnostics, LLC F. Proprietary and Established Names: FilmArray Pneumonia Panel plus G. Regulatory Information: 1. Regulation section: 21 CFR 866.4001 – MERS-CoV and common respiratory pathogens multiplex nucleic acid detection system 2. Classification: Class II (Special Controls) 3. Product code: PZF 4. Panel: 83-Microbiology H. Indications for use: 1. Indications for use(s): The FilmArray Pneumonia Panel plus is a multiplexed nucleic acid test intended for use with FilmArray, FilmArray 2.0, or FilmArray Torch systems for the simultaneous detection and identification of nucleic acids from Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and multiple respiratory viral and bacterial nucleic acids, as well as select antimicrobial resistance genes, in sputum-like specimens (induced or expectorated sputum, or endotracheal aspirates) or bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL)-like specimens (BAL or mini-BAL) obtained from individuals meeting MERS-CoV clinical and/or epidemiological criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • The Risk to Human Health from Free-Living Amoebae Interaction with Legionella in Drinking and Recycled Water Systems
    THE RISK TO HUMAN HEALTH FROM FREE-LIVING AMOEBAE INTERACTION WITH LEGIONELLA IN DRINKING AND RECYCLED WATER SYSTEMS Dissertation submitted by JACQUELINE MARIE THOMAS BACHELOR OF SCIENCE (HONOURS) AND BACHELOR OF ARTS, UNSW In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCHOOL OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING FACULTY OF ENGINEERING MAY 2012 SUPERVISORS Professor Nicholas Ashbolt Office of Research and Development United States Environmental Protection Agency Cincinnati, Ohio USA and School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Faculty of Engineering The University of New South Wales Sydney, Australia Professor Richard Stuetz School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Faculty of Engineering The University of New South Wales Sydney, Australia Doctor Torsten Thomas School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences Faculty of Science The University of New South Wales Sydney, Australia ORIGINALITY STATEMENT '1 hereby declare that this submission is my own work and to the best of my knowledge it contains no materials previously published or written by another person, or substantial proportions of material which have been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma at UNSW or any other educational institution, except where due acknowledgement is made in the thesis. Any contribution made to the research by others, with whom 1 have worked at UNSW or elsewhere, is explicitly acknowledged in the thesis. I also declare that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work, except to the extent that assistance from others in the project's design and conception or in style, presentation and linguistic expression is acknowledged.' Signed ~ ............................
    [Show full text]
  • Mariem Joan Wasan Oloroso
    Interactions between Arcobacter butzleri and free-living protozoa in the context of sewage & wastewater treatment by Mariem Joan Wasan Oloroso A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Environmental Health Sciences School of Public Health University of Alberta © Mariem Joan Wasan Oloroso, 2021 Abstract Water reuse is increasingly becoming implemented as a sustainable water management strategy in areas around the world facing freshwater shortages and nutrient discharge limits. However, there are a host of biological hazards that must be assessed prior to and following the introduction of water reuse schemes. Members of the genus Arcobacter are close relatives to the well-known foodborne campylobacter pathogens and are increasingly being recognized as emerging human pathogens of concern. Arcobacters are prevalent in numerous water environments due to their ability to survive in a wide range of conditions. They are particularly abundant in raw sewage and are able to survive wastewater treatment and disinfection processes, which marks this genus as a potential pathogen of concern for water quality. Because the low levels of Arcobacter excreted by humans do not correlate with the high levels of Arcobacter spp. present in raw sewage, it was hypothesised that other microorganisms in sewage may amplify the growth of Arcobacter species. There is evidence that Arcobacter spp. survive both within and on the surface of free-living protozoa (FLP). As such, this thesis investigated the idea that Arcobacter spp. may be growing within free-living protozoa also prevalent in raw sewage and providing them with protection during treatment and disinfection processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Host-Adaptation in Legionellales Is 2.4 Ga, Coincident with Eukaryogenesis
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/852004; this version posted February 27, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 1 Host-adaptation in Legionellales is 2.4 Ga, 2 coincident with eukaryogenesis 3 4 5 Eric Hugoson1,2, Tea Ammunét1 †, and Lionel Guy1* 6 7 1 Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Science for Life Laboratories, 8 Uppsala University, Box 582, 75123 Uppsala, Sweden 9 2 Department of Microbial Population Biology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary 10 Biology, D-24306 Plön, Germany 11 † current address: Medical Bioinformatics Centre, Turku Bioscience, University of Turku, 12 Tykistökatu 6A, 20520 Turku, Finland 13 * corresponding author 14 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/852004; this version posted February 27, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 15 Abstract 16 Bacteria adapting to living in a host cell caused the most salient events in the evolution of 17 eukaryotes, namely the seminal fusion with an archaeon 1, and the emergence of both the 18 mitochondrion and the chloroplast 2. A bacterial clade that may hold the key to understanding 19 these events is the deep-branching gammaproteobacterial order Legionellales – containing 20 among others Coxiella and Legionella – of which all known members grow inside eukaryotic 21 cells 3.
    [Show full text]
  • List of the Pathogens Intended to Be Controlled Under Section 18 B.E
    (Unofficial Translation) NOTIFICATION OF THE MINISTRY OF PUBLIC HEALTH RE: LIST OF THE PATHOGENS INTENDED TO BE CONTROLLED UNDER SECTION 18 B.E. 2561 (2018) By virtue of the provision pursuant to Section 5 paragraph one, Section 6 (1) and Section 18 of Pathogens and Animal Toxins Act, B.E. 2558 (2015), the Minister of Public Health, with the advice of the Pathogens and Animal Toxins Committee, has therefore issued this notification as follows: Clause 1 This notification is called “Notification of the Ministry of Public Health Re: list of the pathogens intended to be controlled under Section 18, B.E. 2561 (2018).” Clause 2 This Notification shall come into force as from the following date of its publication in the Government Gazette. Clause 3 The Notification of Ministry of Public Health Re: list of the pathogens intended to be controlled under Section 18, B.E. 2560 (2017) shall be cancelled. Clause 4 Define the pathogens codes and such codes shall have the following sequences: (1) English alphabets that used for indicating the type of pathogens are as follows: B stands for Bacteria F stands for fungus V stands for Virus P stands for Parasites T stands for Biological substances that are not Prion R stands for Prion (2) Pathogen risk group (3) Number indicating the sequence of each type of pathogens Clause 5 Pathogens intended to be controlled under Section 18, shall proceed as follows: (1) In the case of being the pathogens that are utilized and subjected to other law, such law shall be complied. (2) Apart from (1), the law on pathogens and animal toxin shall be complied.
    [Show full text]
  • Legionnaires' Disease at an Automobile and Scrap Metal Shredding Facility, New York
    Workplace Safety and Health Legionnaires’ Disease at an Automobile and Scrap Metal Shredding Facility, New York Randy Boylstein, MS, REHS Rachel Bailey, DO, MPH Chris Piacitelli, MS, CIH Christine Schuler, PhD Jean Cox-Ganser, PhD Kathleen Kreiss, MD Health Hazard Evaluation Report HETA 2011-0109-3162 New York August 2012 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health The employer shall post a copy of this report for a period of 30 calendar days at or near the workplace(s) of affected employees. The employer shall take steps to insure that the posted determinations are not altered, defaced, or covered by other material during such period. [37 FR 23640, November 7, 1972, as amended at 45 FR 2653, January 14, 1980]. CON T EN T S REPO rt Abbreviations .......................................................................2 Highlights of the NIOSH Health Hazard Evaluation.............3 Summary.............................................................................. 6 Introduction ..........................................................................8 Background.......................................................................... 8 Assessment .......................................................................14 Results...............................................................................17 Discussion .........................................................................25 Conclusions .......................................................................29
    [Show full text]