DOCSLIB.ORG

2004 Proposed Designation of Critical Habitat

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2004 Proposed Designation of Critical Habitat Wednesday, April 28, 2004 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Proposed Designation of Critical Habitat for the Arroyo Toad (Bufo californicus); Proposed Rule VerDate mar<24>2004 17:51 Apr 27, 2004 Jkt 203001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\28APP2.SGM 28APP2 23254 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 82 / Wednesday, April 28, 2004 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR comments by the alternate methods resources. Sidle (1987) stated, ‘‘Because mentioned above. the ESA can protect species with and Fish and Wildlife Service Comments and materials received, as without critical habitat designation, well as supporting documentation used critical habitat designation may be 50 CFR Part 17 in the preparation of this proposed rule, redundant to the other consultation will be available for public inspection, requirements of section 7.’’ RIN 1018–AT42 by appointment, during normal business Currently, only 445 species or 36 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife hours at the Ventura Fish and Wildlife percent of the 1,244 listed species in the and Plants; Proposed Designation of Office at the address given above, or at U.S. under our jurisdiction have Critical Habitat for the Arroyo Toad the Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office, designated critical habitat. We address (Bufo californicus) 6010 Hidden Valley Road, Carlsbad, CA the habitat needs of all 1,244 listed (telephone 760/431–9440). species through conservation AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For mechanisms such as listing, section 7 Interior. information about Monterey, San Luis consultations, the section 4 recovery ACTION: Proposed rule. Obispo, Santa Barbara, and Ventura planning process, the section 9 Counties, northern Los Angeles County, protective prohibitions of unauthorized SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and and the desert portion of San take, section 6 funding to the States, and Wildlife Service (Service), propose to Bernardino County, contact Diane Noda, the section 10 incidental take permit designate critical habitat for the Field Supervisor, Ventura Fish and process. We believe that it is these federally endangered arroyo toad (Bufo Wildlife Office, at the address given measures that may make the difference californicus) pursuant to the above (telephone 805/644–1766; between extinction and survival for Endangered Species Act of 1973, as facsimile 805/644–3958). For many species. amended (Act). We propose to designate information about Los Angeles, San a total of approximately 138,713 acres Procedural and Resource Difficulties in Bernardino, Riverside, Orange, and San Designating Critical Habitat (ac) (56,133 hectares (ha)) of critical Diego Counties, contact Jim Bartel, Field habitat in Monterey, Santa Barbara, Supervisor, Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife We have been inundated with Ventura, Los Angeles, San Bernardino, Office, at the address given above lawsuits for our failure to designate Riverside, Orange, and San Diego (telephone 760/431–9440; facsimile critical habitat, and we face a growing Counties, California. 760/431–9624). number of lawsuits challenging critical We hereby solicit data and comments SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: habitat determinations once they are from the public on all aspects of this made. These lawsuits have subjected us proposal, including data on economic Designation of Critical Habitat Provides to an ever-increasing series of court and other impacts of designation. We Little Additional Protection to Species orders and court-approved settlement may revise this proposal prior to final In 30 years of implementing the agreements, compliance with which designation to incorporate or address Endangered Species Act of 1973, as now consumes nearly the entire listing new information received during the amended (Act) (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), program budget. This leaves us with two public comment periods. we have found that the designation of little ability to prioritize our activities to DATES: We will accept comments from statutory critical habitat provides little direct scarce listing resources to the all interested parties until May 28, 2004. additional protection to most listed listing program actions with the most We must receive requests for public species, while consuming significant biologically urgent species conservation hearings, in writing, at the address amounts of available conservation needs. shown in the ADDRESSES section by May resources. Our present system for The consequence of the critical 13, 2004. designating critical habitat has evolved habitat litigation activity is that limited ADDRESSES: If you wish to comment, since its original statutory prescription listing funds are used to defend active you may submit your comments and into a process that provides little real lawsuits, and to comply with the materials concerning this proposal by conservation benefit, is driven by growing number of adverse court orders. any one of these methods: litigation and the courts rather than As a result, our own proposals to list 1. You may submit written comments biology, limits our ability to fully critically imperiled species, and make and information to Diane Noda, Field evaluate the science involved, consumes final listing determinations on existing Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife enormous agency resources, and proposals, are all significantly delayed. Service, Ventura Fish and Wildlife imposes huge social and economic The accelerated schedules of court- Office, 2493 Portola Road, Suite B, costs. We believe that additional agency ordered designations have left us with Ventura, CA 93003. discretion would allow our focus to almost no ability to provide for adequate 2. You may hand-deliver written return to those actions that provide the public participation or to ensure a comments to our Ventura Office, at the greatest benefit to the species most in defect-free rulemaking process before address given above. need of protection. making decisions on listing and critical 3. You may submit comments by fax habitat proposals due to the risks to our Ventura Office (facsimile 805/ Role of Critical Habitat in Actual associated with noncompliance with 644–3958) or our Carlsbad Office Practice of Administering and judicially-imposed deadlines. This, in (facsimile 760/431–9624). Implementing the Act turn, fosters a second round of litigation 4. You may send comments by While attention to, and protection of, in which those who fear adverse electronic mail (e-mail) to: habitat is paramount to successful impacts from critical habitat [email protected]. Please see the conservation actions, we have designations challenge those Public Comments Solicited section consistently found that, in most designations. The cycle of litigation below for file format and other circumstances, the designation of appears endless, is very expensive, and information about electronic filing. In critical habitat is of little additional in the final analysis, provides relatively the event that our internet connection is value for most listed species, yet it little additional protection to listed not functional, please submit your consumes large amounts of conservation species. VerDate mar<24>2004 17:51 Apr 27, 2004 Jkt 203001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\28APP2.SGM 28APP2 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 82 / Wednesday, April 28, 2004 / Proposed Rules 23255 The costs resulting from the header and your name and return 650 to 3,280 feet (ft) (200 to 1,000 designation include legal costs, the cost address in the body of your message. If meters (m)) of those streams in coastal of preparation and publication of the you do not receive a confirmation from areas with broad floodplains (Griffin et designation, the analysis of the the system that we have received your al. 1999; Holland and Sisk 2000), and economic effects, and the cost of Internet message, contact us directly by 160 to 650 ft (50 to 200 m) in more requesting and responding to public calling our Ventura Fish and Wildlife mountainous areas away from the coast comment, and in some cases the costs Office at phone number 805/644–1766. (Ramirez 2002a, 2002b, 2002c, 2003). of compliance with the National Please note that the Internet address Arroyo toads typically burrow Environmental Policy Act of 1969—all [email protected] will be closed out underground during periods of are part of the cost of critical habitat at the termination of the public inactivity and thus tend to use upland designation. These costs result in comment period. habitats that have sandy, friable (readily minimal benefit to the species that is Our practice is to make comments, crumbled) soils, but upland sites with not already afforded by the protections including names and home addresses of extremely compact soils can also be of the Act enumerated earlier, and they respondents, available for public review used (D. Holland, in litt. 2000). directly reduce the funds available for during regular business hours. (2) Juvenile arroyo toads remain on or direct and tangible conservation actions. Individual respondents may request that near the saturated substrate at the edges we withhold their home address from Public Comments Solicited of breeding pools from a week to several the rulemaking record, which we will months after metamorphosis (D. We intend that any final action honor to the extent allowable by law. Holland, in litt. 2000). They are active resulting from this proposal will be as There also may be circumstances in during the day and can be exposed on accurate and as effective as possible. which we would withhold from the the barren sand, although they are rather Therefore, comments or suggestions rulemaking record a respondent’s cryptic (i.e., hidden or camouflaged) at from the public, other concerned identity, as allowable by law. If you this time. Crushing of toads by humans, governmental agencies, the scientific wish us to withhold your name and/or livestock, or vehicles can be a community, industry, or any other address, you must state this substantial source of mortality at this interested party concerning this prominently at the beginning of your stage (Service 1999; D.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • San Mateo Creek Watershed Profile
    SAN MATEO CREEK WATERSHED PROFILE http://wrpinfo.scc.ca.gov/watersheds/sm/sm_profile.html Introduction The San Mateo Creek (SMC) watershed covers approximately 139 square miles of relatively undeveloped terrain. The majority of the SMC watershed's drainage area lies within western Riverside and northwestern San Diego Counties, with approximately 20% within the boundary of southeastern Orange County (Jorgensen, et al., 1971; Feldmeth, 1987). San Mateo Creek is one of the last undammed streams in southern California. The mainstem of the San Mateo Creek is over 22 miles long and has four main contributing tributaries: Cristianitos Creek, Talega Creek, Tenaja Creek, and Devil's Canyon (USFS, 1999b). Other contributing drainages within the watershed include Gabino Creek, La Paz Creek, and Cold Spring Creek (PCR et al., 2001). The SMC mainstem flows in a southwestern direction before reaching the Pacific Ocean just south of the City of San Clemente. The SMC watershed drains portions of the Santa Margarita Mountains, Sitton Peak, and the western slopes of the Elsinore Mountains. Cristianitos Creek, the main tributary, joins the mainstem approximately three miles inland from the coast and accounts for 29 square miles of the total watershed (Jorgensen, et al., 1971). The watershed contains two distinct topographical regions: the upper and the coastal. The upper region lies mostly within San Mateo Canyon Wilderness in the Cleveland National Forest. Its lower reaches run through Camp Pendleton Marine Corps Base and San Onofre State Beach. The upper mountainous drainage area consists mostly of the rugged, steep sloped, Santa Ana Mountains, which are bisected by intermittent streams.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Critical Habitat for the Arroyo Toad; Final Rule
    Vol. 76 Wednesday, No. 27 February 9, 2011 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Revised Critical Habitat for the Arroyo Toad; Final Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:03 Feb 08, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\09FER2.SGM 09FER2 srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES2 7246 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 9, 2011 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (TDD), call the Federal Information Life History Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. The following additional information Fish and Wildlife Service SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: and clarifications on the life history of the arroyo toad are based on comments 50 CFR Part 17 Background from peer reviewers (see Peer Review We intend to discuss only those [Docket No. FWS–R8–ES–2009–0069; MO section below) received on the proposed topics directly relevant to the 92210–0–0009–B4] revised rule (74 FR 52612; October 13, designation of revised critical habitat for 2009). RIN 1018–AV89 the arroyo toad under the Endangered We stated in the revised proposed Species Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. rule that most arroyo toads become Endangered and Threatened Wildlife 1531 et seq.), in this final rule. For more sexually mature in the spring following and Plants; Revised Critical Habitat for information on the taxonomy, biology, metamorphosis. However, we should the Arroyo Toad and ecology of the arroyo toad, refer to clarify that unlike males, female arroyo the final listing rule published in the AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, toads generally do not become sexually Federal Register on December 16, 1994 Interior.
    [Show full text]
  • Arroyo Toad (Bufo Californicus (=Microscaphus))
    Arroyo Toad (Bufo californicus (=microscaphus)) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation Arroyo Toad (Bufo californicus) Photo by permission of Will Flaxington U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office Ventura, California August 2009 5-YEAR REVIEW Arroyo Toad (Bufo californicus (=microscaphus)) I. GENERAL INFORMATION Purpose of 5-Year Reviews: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is required by section 4(c)(2) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (Act) to conduct a status review of each listed species at least once every 5 years. The purpose of a 5-year review is to evaluate whether or not the species’ status has changed since it was listed (or since the most recent 5-year review). Based on the 5-year review, we recommend whether the species should be removed from the list of endangered and threatened species, be changed in status from endangered to threatened, or be changed in status from threatened to endangered. Our original listing of a species as endangered or threatened is based on the existence of threats attributable to one or more of the five threat factors described in section 4(a)(1) of the Act, and we must consider these same five factors in any subsequent consideration of reclassification or delisting of a species. In the 5-year review, we consider the best available scientific and commercial data on the species, and focus on new information available since the species was listed or last reviewed. If we recommend a change in listing status based on the results of the 5-year review, we must propose to do so through a separate rule-making process defined in the Act that includes public review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventoried Roadless Areas and Wilderness Evaluations
    Introduction and Evaluation Process Summary Inventoried Roadless Areas and Wilderness Evaluations For reader convenience, all wilderness evaluation documents are compiled here, including duplicate sections that are also found in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Appendix D Inventoried Roadless Areas. Introduction and Evaluation Process Summary Inventoried Roadless Areas Proposed Wilderness by and Wilderness Evaluations Alternative Introduction and Evaluation Process Summary Roadless areas refer to substantially natural landscapes without constructed and maintained roads. Some improvements and past activities are acceptable within roadless areas. Inventoried roadless areas are identified in a set of maps contained in the Forest Service Roadless Area Conservation Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS), Volume 2, November 2000. These areas may contain important environmental values that warrant protection and are, as a general rule, managed to preserve their roadless characteristics. In the past, roadless areas were evaluated as potential additions to the National Wilderness Preservation System. Roadless areas have maintained their ecological and social values, and are important both locally and nationally. Recognition of the values of roadless areas is increasing as our population continues to grow and demand for outdoor recreation and other uses of the Forests rises. These unroaded and undeveloped areas provide the Forests with opportunities for potential wilderness, as well as non-motorized recreation, commodities and amenities. The original Forest Plans evaluated Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (RARE II) data from the mid- 1980s and recommended wilderness designation for some areas. Most areas were left in a roadless, non- motorized use status. This revision of Forest Plans analyzes a new and more complete land inventory of inventoried roadless areas as well as other areas identified by the public during scoping.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual-Level Hydrology Study, LEAPS, August 28
    TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................... ES-1 SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................1 1.1 GENERAL............................................................................................................................1 1.2 BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................................1 1.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION...................................................................................................2 1.4 SCOPE OF WORK...............................................................................................................3 1.5 ORGANIZATION OF THIS REPORT................................................................................3 SECTION 2: HYDROLOGIC BASELINE DATA ....................................................................5 2.1 GENERAL............................................................................................................................5 2.1.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................5 2.1.2 San Juan Creek Watershed Management Plan............................................................6 2.1.3 Agency Consultation...................................................................................................6 2.2 DESCRIPTION OF IN-STREAM FLOW USES IN THE PROJECT
    [Show full text]
  • Species Accounts -- Animals
    SoCal Biodiversity - Animals Arboreal Salamander Amphibian SoCal Biodiversity - Animals Arboreal Salamander Amphibian Arroyo Toad Arboreal Salamander Arboreal Salamander (Aneides lugubris) Management Status Heritage Status Rank: G5N5S4 Federal: None State: None Other: Species identified as a local viability concern (Stephenson and Calcarone 1999) General Distribution Arboreal salamander occurs in yellow pine and black oak forests in the Sierra Nevada, and in coastal live oak woodlands from northern California to Baja California. The species also occurs in the foothills of the Sierra Nevada from El Dorado County to Madera County and on South Farallon, Santa Catalina, Los Coronados, and Ano Nuevo islands off the coast of California (Petranka 1998, Stebbins 1951, Stebbins 1985). Arboreal salamander occurs from sea level to an elevation of about 5,000 feet (1,520 meters) (Stebbins 1985). Distribution in the Planning Area Arboreal salamander reportedly occurs in the foothills and lower elevations of every mountain range on National Forest System lands, although it is seldom seen (Stephenson and Calcarone 1999). There are records of occurrence for this species on the Los Padres National Forest near upper San Juan Creek and on the Cleveland National Forest near Soldier Creek (USDA Forest Service file information), San Gabriel foothills east to Day Canyon, and in the San Jacinto Mountains (Goodward pers. comm.). Systematics There are four species in the genus Aneides in the western United States, three of which occur in California (Stebbins 1985). Of these three, only arboreal salamander ranges into southern California. Most of the Aneides salamanders climb (Stebbins 1985). Arboreal salamander consists of two chromosomally differentiated groups that intergrade in south and east-central Mendocino County, about 56 miles (90 kilometers) north of the San Francisco Bay region (Sessions and Kezer 1987).
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of the Effects of Fuel Treatments and Previous Wildfires on Fire Behavior and Suppression for the Day and Zaca Fires on the Los Padres National Forest
    080107 Draft An Assessment of the Effects of Fuel Treatments and Previous Wildfires on Fire Behavior and Suppression for the Day and Zaca Fires on the Los Padres National Forest Day Fire photo taken Sept. 17, 2006, courtesy of NASA, Astronaut photo ISSO13-E-81687, provided by ISS Crew Earth Observations experiment and the Image Science & Analysis Group, Johnson Space Center. Zaca Fire photo courtesy of NASA. Taken on Aug. 5, 2007 by the MODIS Rapid Response Team. Carol Henson Fire Management Specialist U.S. Forest Service Adaptive Management Services Enterprise Team - 1 - 080107 Draft Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Introduction 6 Wildland Urban Interface 7 Fire History on the Los Padres National Forest 8 Objectives 9 Methodology 9 2006 Day Fire 9 Description of Fire Environment 10 Fire Danger and Weather 10 Fuels 11 Fuel Treatments 12 Topography 13 Fire Behavior Chronology 13 Fire Effects of Fuel Treatments 15 Fire Behavior 15 Suppression Effectiveness 16 Fire Effects of Non-treatments 16 Fire Behavior 16 2007 Zaca Fire 16 Description of Fire Environment 17 Fire Danger and Weather 17 Fuels 19 Fuel Treatments 19 Topography 22 Fire Behavior Chronology 22 Fire Effects of Fuel Treatments 26 Fire Behavior 26 Suppression Effectiveness 27 Fire Effects of Non-treatments 27 Fire Behavior 27 Summary 28 Acknowledgement 30 Appendices 31 - 2 - 080107 Draft Executive Summary The 2006 Day and 2007 Zaca Fires both occurred on the Los Padres National Forest in California. The 2006 Day Fire burned over 162,000 acres mostly in rugged terrain with moderate to heavy chaparral and timber.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California, in 2000
    Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California, in 2000 June 2001 U.S. Geological Survey Western Ecological Research Center San Diego Field Station Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California, in 2000 Final Report Prepared for: Assistant Chief of Staff, Environmental Security U.S. Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton Camp Pendleton, California 92055 Prepared by: Barbara E. Kus U.S.G.S. Western Ecological Research Center San Diego Field Station 5745 Kearny Villa Road, Suite M San Diego, California 92123 June 2001 MIPR# M3320000MP0030 Recommended citation: Kus, B.E. 2000. Distribution, abundance and breeding activities of the southwestern willow flycatcher at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California, in 2000. Final Report prepared for Assistant Chief of Staff, Environmental Security, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES i LIST OF FIGURES ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY iii INTRODUCTION 1 STUDY AREAS AND METHODS 2 Field Surveys 2 Nest Monitoring 10 Banding 10 RESULTS 10 Population Size and Distribution 10 Habitat Characteristics 25 Breeding Activities 25 Nest Site Characteristics 25 Cowbird Parasitism 28 Banded Birds 28 DISCUSSION 30 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 31 LITERATURE CITED 33 LIST OF TABLES 1. Habitat characteristics of willow flycatcher locations at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton in 2000 26 2. Nesting activities of southwestern willow flycatcher pairs at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton in 2000 27 3. Nest site characteristics of southwestern willow flycatchers at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton in 2000 27 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Cenozoic Deformation of the Franciscan Complex, Eastern Santa Maria Basin, California
    U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cenozoic Deformation of the Franciscan Complex, Eastern Santa Maria Basin, California Regional Thermal Maturity of Surface Rocks, Onshore Santa Maria Basin and Santa Barbara-Ventura Basin Area, California Bulletin 1995-W, X Geophysical section offshore Santa Maria basin Geologic section onshore Santa Maria basin uses science for a changing world Availability of Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey Order U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) publications from the Documents. Check or money order must be payable to the offices listed below. Detailed ordering instructions, along with Superintendent of Documents. Order by mail from prices of the last offerings, are given in the current-year issues of the catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Superintendent of Documents Survey." Government Printing Office Washington, DC 20402 Books, Maps, and Other Publications Information Periodicals By Mail Many Information Periodicals products are available through Books, maps, and other publications are available by mail the systems or formats listed below: from Printed Products USGS Information Services Box 25286, Federal Center Printed copies of the Minerals Yearbook and the Mineral Com­ Denver, CO 80225 modity Summaries can be ordered from the Superintendent of Publications include Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water- Documents, Government Printing Office (address above). Supply Papers, Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Printed copies of Metal Industry Indicators and Mineral Indus­ Circulars, Fact Sheets, publications of general interest, single try Surveys can be ordered from the Center for Disease Control copies of permanent USGS catalogs, and topographic and and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and thematic maps.
    [Show full text]
  • Balance Hydrologics, Inc..$5
    Balance Hydrologics, Inc..$5 Geomorphologic Factors Affecting Sediment Generation and Transport Under Pre- and Post-Urbanization Conditions at Rancho Mission Viejo and in the San Juan and San Mateo Watersheds, Orange County, California Report prepared for: Rancho Mission Viejo Prepared by: Barry Hecht Scott Brown Bonnie Mallory Balance Hydrologics, Inc. June2005 Balance Hydrologics, Inc. - - A report prepared for: Rancho Mission Viejo -. 28811 Ortega Highway San Juan Capistrano, California 92692 (949) 240-3363 - Attn: Laura Coley Eisenberg - Geomorphologic Factors Affecting Sediment Generation and Transport Under Pre- and Post-Urbanization conditions at Rancho Mission Viejo and in the San Juan and San Mateo Watersheds, Orange County, California. Balance Project Assignment 205069 - - - ENGINEERING Scott Brown - Hydrologist / Geon)orph~logist Hydrologist/ Geochemist -- - 8 -- 2005 Balance Hydrologics, Inc. 841 Folger Avenue Berkeley, California 947 10-2800 -. (5 10) 704- 1000 ofice @ balancehydro.corn June24,2005 Balance Hydrologics. Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................1 1.1 REPORT OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 CONTEXT AND BACKGROUND.................................................................................................................. 2 1.3 APPROACH .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell's Vireo at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California
    Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell's Vireo at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California 2005 Annual Report Prepared for: Assistant Chief of Staff, Environmental Security U.S. Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WESTERN ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH CENTER Distribution, Abundance, and Breeding Activities of the Least Bell's Vireo at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California By James W. Rourke and Barbara E. Kus U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WESTERN ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH CENTER 2005 Annual Report Prepared for: Assistant Chief of Staff, Environmental Security U.S. Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton Camp Pendleton, California 92055 San Diego Field Station USGS Western Ecological Research Center 4165 Spruance Road, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92101 Sacramento, California 2006 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, SECRETARY U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY P. Patrick Leahy, Acting Director The use of firm, trade, or brand names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information, contact: Center Director Western Ecological Research Center U.S. Geological Survey 3020 State University Drive Sacramento, CA 95819 Cover photograph by Josephine Falcone Recommended citation: Rourke, J. W. and B. E. Kus. 2006. Distribution, abundance and breeding activities of the Least Bell's Vireo at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California. 2005 Annual Report. Prepared for Assistant Chief of Staff, Environmental Security, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES...........................................................................................................................iii LIST OF FIGURES........................................................................................................................iii LIST OF APPENDICES…………………………………………………………………………..iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Final Designation of Critical Habitat for the Arroyo Toad (Bufo Californicus); Final Rule
    Wednesday, April 13, 2005 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Final Designation of Critical Habitat for the Arroyo Toad (Bufo californicus); Final Rule VerDate jul<14>2003 16:23 Apr 12, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\13APR2.SGM 13APR2 19562 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 13, 2005 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR most listed species, while consuming Procedural and Resource Difficulties in significant amounts of available Designating Critical Habitat Fish and Wildlife Service conservation resources. The Service’s We have been inundated with present system for designating critical lawsuits for our failure to designate 50 CFR Part 17 habitat has evolved since its original critical habitat, and we face a growing RIN 1018–AT42 statutory prescription into a process that number of lawsuits challenging critical provides little real conservation benefit, habitat determinations once they are Endangered and Threatened Wildlife is driven by litigation and the courts made. These lawsuits have subjected the and Plants; Final Designation of rather than biology, limits our ability to Service to an ever-increasing series of Critical Habitat for the Arroyo Toad fully evaluate the science involved, court orders and court-approved (Bufo californicus) consumes enormous agency resources, settlement agreements, compliance with and imposes huge social and economic AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, which now consumes nearly the entire costs. The Service believes that Interior. listing program budget. This leaves the additional agency discretion would ACTION: Final rule.
    [Show full text]