DOCSLIB.ORG

National Park Service Cave and Karst Resources Management Case Study: Great Smoky Mountains National Park Daniel C

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Park Service Cave and Karst Resources Management Case Study: Great Smoky Mountains National Park Daniel C Western Kentucky University TopSCHOLAR® Masters Theses & Specialist Projects Graduate School 5-2011 National Park Service Cave and Karst Resources Management Case Study: Great Smoky Mountains National Park Daniel C. Nolfi Western Kentucky University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses Part of the Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, and the Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons Recommended Citation Nolfi, Daniel C., "National Park Service Cave and Karst Resources Management Case Study: Great Smoky Mountains National Park" (2011). Masters Theses & Specialist Projects. Paper 1053. http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses/1053 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by TopSCHOLAR®. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses & Specialist Projects by an authorized administrator of TopSCHOLAR®. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE CAVE AND KARST RESOURCES MANAGEMENT CASE STUDY: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Geography and Geology Western Kentucky University Bowling Green, Kentucky In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science By Daniel C. Nolfi May 2011 NATIONAL PARK SERVICE CAVE AND KARST RESOURCES MANAGEMENT CASE STUDY: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK Dr. Christoph . Groves, Director of Thesis Dr. Ja~~ olk Dr.£4~P'fZ Jo~me~ espam , I" ';/;/f ( Dean, Graduate Studies and Research ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to extend my thanks and appreciation to the organizations that provided funding and logistical support for this thesis. The US Department of the Interior, National Park Service, provided funding through Western Kentucky University for the study and research of caves and karst on National Park Service lands. Western Kentucky University, Hoffman Environmental Research Institute provided opportunity to collaborate and exchange information with resource and academic professionals. The Great Smoky Mountains National Park; Gatlinburg, Tennessee provided support from within their Resource Management and Science Division and provided information on caves and karst resources. I would like to extend my thanks to my advisor Dr. Chris Groves who managed to find the time, when needed most, to assist in putting much of this together. I’d also like to thank my committee members, Dr. Jason Polk, Dr. Richard Toomey, and Joel Despain for their attention to detail and assistance with my project. Most importantly, I would like to thank Johanna Kovarik who has inspired my interest in caves and karst as well as their management. Her knowledge of cave and karst science and edits to my thesis kept me on track. Her personal support made it possible for me to finish during a period when completion seemed impossible...Thank you! iii PREFACE This thesis is a first step towards understanding the complex nature around development and implementation of a cave and karst program on a National Park Service unit. In reviewing the literature and incorporation of policy and management guidelines specific to the needs of cave and karst resources in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park, development of a holistic karst wide management plan is shown to provide the necessary protection for caves and karst areas with caves or no known caves. Chapter 1 provides a basic understanding and information about caves and karst environments. It also takes a look at the importance of this research and the significance to the Great Smoky Mountains National Park Management. It defines the options surrounding the use of a cave or karst focus of management. Chapter 2 takes an in-depth look at the science surrounding the understanding of cave and karst resources. It concludes with a look at management of these resources throughout history, summing up federal management as well as what has taken place within the Great Smoky Mountains National Park to date. Chapter 3 provides the process by which information was obtained from the literature, questionnaires, field investigations and consultation with cave and karst experts. Chapter 4 states the results from the questionnaires, resource inventories, and newly discovered resources. Chapter 5 provides a discussion of the implications of these results and a conclusion. It focuses on needs of the resources and the protection provided by a cave or karst driven management plan. In addition, Chapter 5 concludes with a final look at the Great Smoky Mountains National Park as a case study, and the need to develop a holistic management plan specific to its caves and entire karst landscape. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...............................................................................................iii PREFACE .......................................................................................................................... iv TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................... v LIST OF FIGURES...........................................................................................................vii LIST OF TABLES ...........................................................................................................viii ABSTRACT.......................................................................................................................ix CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................. 1 Cave and Karst Landscapes.................................................................. 2 Significance and Justification............................................................... 5 Problem Statement and Purpose........................................................... 6 II. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................... 9 Cave and Karst Landscape Science..................................................... 9 History of Cave and Karst Protection and Management................... 14 Federal Cave and Karst Management................................................ 20 Great Smoky Mountains National Park............................................. 28 III. METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................... 38 Federal Policy and Literature Review .............................................. 38 Land Managing Questionnaire ......................................................... 39 Field Visits and Review ................................................................... 41 Consultation ..................................................................................... 42 IV. RESULTS ....................................................................................................... 43 Questionnaire Findings .................................................................... 43 GRSM Karst Biological Data Compilation...................................... 51 GRSM Field Interpretation and Additional Resources .................... 53 v Newly Recognized Karst Areas and Their Resources...................... 76 V. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS ........................................................... 83 Karst (Landscape) and Cave (Specific) Focused Management......... 83 NPS Management.............................................................................. 86 Case Study: GRSM Management...................................................... 90 Conclusions....................................................................................... 98 VI. REFERENCES............................................................................................... 100 VII. APPENDICES ............................................................................................... 107 A. Federal Management Questionnaires ......................................... 107 B. Additional GRSM Cave and Karst Biology ............................... 127 C. Draft Management Plan and Resource Assessment ................... 136 Table of Contents .........................................................................-3- Introduction and Main Body ........................................................-6- References ..................................................................................-84- Appendices.................................................................................-90- Appendix a (GRSM Cave Maps) ..........................................-90- Appendix b (GRSM Cave/Karst Photos) ............................-101- Appendix c (Responsibility Waiver)...................................-105- Appendix d (Cave Inventory Form) ....................................-107- Glossary....................................................................................-113- vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 – Great Smoky Mountains National Park ........................................................... 30 Figure 2 – Cades Cove fenster with denoted surficial and shallow carbonate.................. 54 Figure 3 – Bull Sink, Rich Mountain – Karst developed uvala just inside boundary....... 60 Figure 4 – Big Spring Cove, early development of a fenster ............................................ 65 Figure 5 – White Oak Sink, portion of Tuckaleechee fenster managed by GRSM .......... 67 vii LIST OF TABLES Table 1 – Summary of successful management actions reported from federal agencies, Questionnaire Results
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Russell of What to Do with the Pups
    with their lives. To meet that challenge, At first most trips were north to the Gorman Texas A&M College (as it was then called) Falls area and surrounding counties; soon offered Bill’s father a teaching position in adventurous cavers realized there was great the Geology Department. He accepted the potential in West Texas. Edwards County offer, and the family—father, mother, Bill, with caves like the Devil’s Sinkhole, Dunbar, and newly arrived little brother Philip, moved and Felton became a common objective. [. .] to Bryan, which would be Bill’s home until It was great fun and we were hugely creative he graduated from high school. with our equipment, primitive though it now Home life was tranquil, both emotion- might seem. […] ally and acoustically. The acoustics resulted At the Carlsbad NSS convention in from Bill’s parents not buying a TV until both 1960, Texans discovered SRT [single rope brothers went off to UT. There was, however, technique], and the world changed. A vicious no lack of stimulus since, with no TV, family fight rocked the UT Grotto as the more members could actually read. In between conservative denounced the unsafe new meals, there was a living room lined with methods. But the word was out: a small books, not to mention a set of Compton’s group could push the deepest caves then Encyclopedia. known; elaborate expeditions were no longer Bill’s parents, rather than being heli- necessary. copter parents, were helipad parents, who Then we discovered Mexico. Cars, launched the brothers out the door for parts trucks, third class Mexican busses, and unknown.
    [Show full text]
  • Saugus Iron Works National Historic Site Amphibian and Reptile Inventory March – September 2001
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Saugus Iron Works National Historic Site Amphibian and Reptile Inventory March – September 2001 Natural Resource Report NPS/NETN/NRR—2010/248 ON THE COVER Northern two-lined salamander - Saugus Iron Works NHS is a locally important site for this stream-dwelling salamander. Photograph by: Dave Brotherton Saugus Iron Works National Historic Site Amphibian and Reptile Inventory March – September 2001 Natural Resource Report NPS/NETN/NRR—2010/248 Robert P. Cook National Park Service Cape Cod National Seashore Wellfleet, MA 02667 David K. Brotherton Department of Herpetology Wildlife Conservation Society Bronx Zoo Bronx, NY 10460-1099 John L. Behler1 Department of Herpetology Wildlife Conservation Society Bronx Zoo Bronx, NY 10460-1099 1 deceased September 2010 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Functional Morphology of Attachment Devices in Arachnida
    Comparative functional morphology of attachment devices in Arachnida Vergleichende Funktionsmorphologie der Haftstrukturen bei Spinnentieren (Arthropoda: Arachnida) DISSERTATION zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) an der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel vorgelegt von Jonas Otto Wolff geboren am 20. September 1986 in Bergen auf Rügen Kiel, den 2. Juni 2015 Erster Gutachter: Prof. Stanislav N. Gorb _ Zweiter Gutachter: Dr. Dirk Brandis _ Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 17. Juli 2015 _ Zum Druck genehmigt: 17. Juli 2015 _ gez. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang J. Duschl, Dekan Acknowledgements I owe Prof. Stanislav Gorb a great debt of gratitude. He taught me all skills to get a researcher and gave me all freedom to follow my ideas. I am very thankful for the opportunity to work in an active, fruitful and friendly research environment, with an interdisciplinary team and excellent laboratory equipment. I like to express my gratitude to Esther Appel, Joachim Oesert and Dr. Jan Michels for their kind and enthusiastic support on microscopy techniques. I thank Dr. Thomas Kleinteich and Dr. Jana Willkommen for their guidance on the µCt. For the fruitful discussions and numerous information on physical questions I like to thank Dr. Lars Heepe. I thank Dr. Clemens Schaber for his collaboration and great ideas on how to measure the adhesive forces of the tiny glue droplets of harvestmen. I thank Angela Veenendaal and Bettina Sattler for their kind help on administration issues. Especially I thank my students Ingo Grawe, Fabienne Frost, Marina Wirth and André Karstedt for their commitment and input of ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Cave Research Foundation
    CAVE RESEARCH FOUNDATION QUARTERLY NEWSLETTER FEBRUARY 2 005 VOLUME 33, NO. 1 SPOTLIGHT ON MAMMOTH CAVE See Mammoth Cave Expedition Reports, pages 6-11 2 CRF NEWSLETTER Annual Report Submission Guidelines for 2004 Volume 33, No.I The Cave Research Foundation solicits reports established 1973 from CRF operations areas, research expeditions, pro­ Send all articles and reports for submission to: jects, and sponsored scientific and historical research William Payne, Editor projects for the 2004 Annual Report. The deadline for 5213 Brazos Midland, TX 79707-3161 submissions is March 1, 2005. Maps, photos, line drawings, charts, tables and The CRF Newsletter is a quarterly publication of the other images are an important part of the report and Cave Research Foundation, a non-profit organization should be chosen and prepared with the goal of com­ incorporated in 1957 under the laws of Kentucky for the municating significant achievements and discoveries purpose of furthering research, conservation, and during 2004. education about caves and karst. A new feature for the 2004 Annual Report will be Newsletter Submissions & Deadlines: the limited inclusion of color photos. High quality, Original articles and photographs are welcome. If intending to jointly submit material to another publication, please in­ high-resolution photos will be needed for the front and form the CRF editor. Publication cannot be guaranteed, espe­ back covers. If enough high-quality submissions are cially if submitted elsewhere. All material is subject to revi­ received and the printing budget warrants it, there may sion unless the author specifically requests otherwise. For be a color plate insert in the report.
    [Show full text]
  • The Natural History, Distribution, and Phenotypic Variation of Cave-Dwelling Spring Salamanders, Gyrinophilus Spp
    Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar Theses, Dissertations and Capstones 2005 The aN tural History, Distribution, and Phenotypic Variation of Cave-dwelling Spring Salamanders, Gyrinophilus spp. Cope (Plethodontidae), in West Virginia Michael Steven Osbourn Follow this and additional works at: http://mds.marshall.edu/etd Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Osbourn, Michael Steven, "The aN tural History, Distribution, and Phenotypic Variation of Cave-dwelling Spring Salamanders, Gyrinophilus spp. Cope (Plethodontidae), in West Virginia" (2005). Theses, Dissertations and Capstones. Paper 735. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Marshall Digital Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Marshall Digital Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Natural History, Distribution, and Phenotypic Variation of Cave-dwelling Spring Salamanders, Gyrinophilus spp. Cope (Plethodontidae), in West Virginia. Thesis submitted to The Graduate College of Marshall University In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Science Biological Sciences By Michael Steven Osbourn Thomas K. Pauley, Committee Chairperson Daniel K. Evans, PhD Thomas G. Jones, PhD Marshall University May 2005 Abstract The Natural History, Distribution, and Phenotypic Variation of Cave-dwelling Spring Salamanders, Gyrinophilus spp. Cope (Plethodontidae), in West Virginia. Michael S. Osbourn There are over 4000 documented caves in West Virginia, potentially providing refuge and habitat for a diversity of amphibians and reptiles. Spring Salamanders, Gyrinophilus porphyriticus, are among the most frequently encountered amphibians in caves. Surveys of 25 caves provided expanded distribution records and insight into ecology and diet of G.
    [Show full text]
  • Arachnid Types in the Zoological Museum, Moscow State University. I
    Arthropoda Selecta 25(3): 327–334 © ARTHROPODA SELECTA, 2016 Arachnid types in the Zoological Museum, Moscow State University. I. Opiliones (Arachnida) Òèïû ïàóêîîáðàçíûõ â Çîîëîãè÷åñêîì ìóçåå ÌÃÓ. I. Opiliones (Arachnida) Kirill G. Mikhailov Ê.Ã. Ìèõàéëîâ Zoological Museum MGU, Bolshaya Nikitskaya Str. 2, Moscow 125009 Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Зоологический музей МГУ, ул. Большая Никитская, 2, Москва 125009 Россия. KEY WORDS: arachnids, harvestmen, museum collections, types, holotypes, paratypes. КЛЮЧЕВЫЕ СЛОВА: паукообразные, сенокосцы, музейные коллекции, типы, голотипы, паратипы. ABSTRACT: A list is provided of 19 holotypes pod types, as well as most of the crustacean types have and 92 paratypes belonging to 25 species of Opiliones. never enjoyed published catalogues. They represent 14 genera and 5 families (Ischyropsali- Traditionally, the following handwritten informa- dae, Nemastomatidae, Phalangiidae, Sabaconidae, tion sources are accepted in the Museum, at least so Trogulidae) and are kept in the Zoological Museum of since the 1930’s: (1) department acquisition book (Fig. the Moscow State University. Other repositories hous- 1), (2) numerous inventory books on diverse inverte- ing the remaining types of the respective species are brate groups (see Fig. 2 for Opiliones), and (3) type listed as well. cards (Fig. 3). Regrettably, only a small part of this information has been digitalized. РЕЗЮМЕ: Представлен список 19 голотипов и This paper starts a series of lists/catalogues of arach- 92 паратипов, относящихся к 25 видам сенокосцев nid types kept at the Museum. The arachnid collection (Opiliones). Они принадлежат к 14 родам и 5 семей- considered was founded in the 1860’s and presently ствам (Ischyropsalidae, Nemastomatidae, Phalangiidae, contains more than 200,000 specimens of arachnids Sabaconidae, Trogulidae) и хранятся в Зоологичес- alone, Acari excluded [Mikhailov, 2016].
    [Show full text]
  • Appl. Entomol. Zool. 45(1): 89-100 (2010)
    Appl. Entomol. Zool. 45 (1): 89–100 (2010) http://odokon.org/ Mini Review Psocid: A new risk for global food security and safety Muhammad Shoaib AHMEDANI,1,* Naz SHAGUFTA,2 Muhammad ASLAM1 and Sayyed Ali HUSSNAIN3 1 Department of Entomology, University of Arid Agriculture, Rawalpindi, Pakistan 2 Department of Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture, Punjab, Pakistan 3 School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9QG UK (Received 13 January 2009; Accepted 2 September 2009) Abstract Post-harvest losses caused by stored product pests are posing serious threats to global food security and safety. Among the storage pests, psocids were ignored in the past due to unavailability of the significant evidence regarding quantitative and qualitative losses caused by them. Their economic importance has been recognized by many re- searchers around the globe since the last few years. The published reports suggest that the pest be recognized as a new risk for global food security and safety. Psocids have been found infesting stored grains in the USA, Australia, UK, Brazil, Indonesia, China, India and Pakistan. About sixteen species of psocids have been identified and listed as pests of stored grains. Psocids generally prefer infested kernels having some fungal growth, but are capable of excavating the soft endosperm of damaged or cracked uninfected grains. Economic losses due to their feeding are directly pro- portional to the intensity of infestation and their population. The pest has also been reported to cause health problems in humans. Keeping the economic importance of psocids in view, their phylogeny, distribution, bio-ecology, manage- ment and pest status have been reviewed in this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Psocoptera: Liposcelididae, Trogiidae)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska 2015 Evaluation of Potential Attractants for Six Species of Stored- Product Psocids (Psocoptera: Liposcelididae, Trogiidae) John Diaz-Montano USDA-ARS, [email protected] James F. Campbell USDA-ARS, [email protected] Thomas W. Phillips Kansas State University, [email protected] James E. Throne USDA-ARS, Manhattan, KS, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub Diaz-Montano, John; Campbell, James F.; Phillips, Thomas W.; and Throne, James E., "Evaluation of Potential Attractants for Six Species of Stored- Product Psocids (Psocoptera: Liposcelididae, Trogiidae)" (2015). Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty. 2048. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub/2048 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. STORED-PRODUCT Evaluation of Potential Attractants for Six Species of Stored- Product Psocids (Psocoptera: Liposcelididae, Trogiidae) 1,2 1 3 JOHN DIAZ-MONTANO, JAMES F. CAMPBELL, THOMAS W. PHILLIPS, AND JAMES E. THRONE1,4 J. Econ. Entomol. 108(3): 1398–1407 (2015); DOI: 10.1093/jee/tov028 ABSTRACT Psocids have emerged as worldwide pests of stored commodities during the past two decades, and are difficult to control with conventional management tactics such as chemical insecticides.
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa, Two New Species of Blind, Forest Litter-Inhabiting Ground
    TERM OF USE This pdf is provided by Magnolia Press for private/research use. Commercial sale or deposition in a public library or website site is prohibited. Zootaxa 1740: 37–44 (2008) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2008 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Two new species of blind, forest litter-inhabiting ground beetles from the subtribe Anillina (Carabidae: Trechinae: Bembidiini) from eastern U.S.A. IGOR M. SOKOLOV1 & CHRISTOPHER E. CARLTON2 Louisiana State Arthropod Museum, Department of Entomology, LSU Agricultural Center Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70803, USA. E- mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract Two new species of anilline ground beetles are described from the Appalachian Mountains of eastern United States. The description of Serranillus septentrionis n. sp. is based on specimens collected in montane areas of western Virginia (37°25.33’N, 79°45.43’W). This species extends the range of the genus approximately 200 km north of its closest known congeners, S. dunavani (Jeannel) and S. jeanneli Barr, and differs from them mainly in characters of the male genitalia. A key is provided that will allow separation of these three species without dissection. The description of Anillinus cherokee n. sp. is based on specimens collected in Great Smoky Mountains National Park and nearby areas of Nantahala National Forest, western North Carolina (35°21.33’N, 83°56.05’W). The species is externally similar to A. loweae Sokolov and Carlton and A. steevesi Barr,
    [Show full text]
  • Mercury in Northern Green Frogs and Snapping Turtles from Onondaga Lake, New York
    MERCURY IN NORTHERN GREEN FROGS AND SNAPPING TURTLES FROM ONONDAGA LAKE, NEW YORK Prepared by the New York Field Office of the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service December 2015 For the Onondaga Lake Natural Resource Damage Assessment and Restoration Trustee Council i ABSTRACT This study was conducted to develop an initial understanding of the exposure of amphibians and reptiles at Onondaga Lake to mercury (Hg). Mercury in Onondaga Lake northern green frogs is within the range of Hg concentrations shown to affect metamorphosis and survival of southern leopard frog tadpoles and metamorphs, but less than concentrations associated with effects in wood frogs and American toads. Mercury in the toenails and blood of snapping turtles from Onondaga Lake was significantly higher than Hg in the toenails and blood of Hamlin Wildlife Management Area (reference area) snapping turtles. Onondaga Lake snapping turtles have more Hg in their keratinous tissue (toenails) than other snapping turtles sampled across New York State, but less Hg than found in keratinous tissues of snapping turtles from a Hg-contaminated area in Virginia. Snapping turtles appear fairly resistant to Hg, but the Hg concentrations found in Onondaga Lake snapping turtles are within the range of concentrations associated with altered thyroid function and immune suppression in other turtle species. Although the diversity of amphibians and reptiles has increased at Onondaga Lake over the past two decades, the herpetofaunal diversity and population densities remain lower than in surrounding areas. This study shows that Hg may be a factor inhibiting the reproduction and health of some amphibians and reptiles at Onondaga Lake.
    [Show full text]
  • TITLE PAGE.Wpd
    Proceedings of BAT GATE DESIGN: A TECHNICAL INTERACTIVE FORUM Held at Red Lion Hotel Austin, Texas March 4-6, 2002 BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL Edited by: Kimery C. Vories Dianne Throgmorton Proceedings of Bat Gate Design: A Technical Interactive Forum Proceedings of Bat Gate Design: A Technical Interactive Forum held March 4 -6, 2002 at the Red Lion Hotel, Austin, Texas Edited by: Kimery C. Vories Dianne Throgmorton Published by U.S. Department of Interior, Office of Surface Mining, Alton, Illinois and Coal Research Center, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois U.S. Department of Interior, Office of Surface Mining, Alton, Illinois Coal Research Center, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois Copyright 2002 by the Office of Surface Mining. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Bat Gate Design: A Technical Interactive Forum (2002: Austin, Texas) Proceedings of Bat Gate Design: Red Lion Hotel, Austin, Texas, March 4-6, 2002/ edited by Kimery C. Vories, Dianne Throgmorton; sponsored by U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Office of Surface Mining and Fish and Wildlife Service, Bat Conservation International, the National Cave and Karst Management Symposium, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, the National Speleological Society, Texas Parks and Wildlife, the Lower Colorado River Authority, the Indiana Karst Conservancy, and Coal Research Center, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 1-885189-05-2 1. Bat ConservationBUnited States Congresses. 2. Bat Gate Design BUnited States Congresses. 3. Cave Management BUnited State Congresses. 4. Strip miningBEnvironmental aspectsBUnited States Congresses.
    [Show full text]
  • Bat Caves in Fiji
    Bat caves in Fiji Status and conservation of roosting caves of the Fiji blossom bat (Notopteris macdonaldi), the Pacific sheath-tailed bat (Emballonura semicaudata) and the Fiji free-tailed bat (Chaerephon bregullae). Joanne Malotaux NatureFiji-MareqetiViti July 2012 Bat caves in Fiji Status and conservation of roosting caves of the Fiji blossom bat (Notopteris macdonaldi), the Pacific sheath-tailed bat (Emballonura semicaudata) and the Fiji free-tailed bat (Chaerephon bregullae). Report number: 2012-15 Date: 27th June 2012 Prepared by: Joanne Malotaux, intern at NatureFiji-MareqetiViti NatureFiji-MareqetiViti 14 Hamilton-Beattie Street Suva, Fiji Cover page picture: Wailotua cave. © Joanne Malotaux. 1 CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Chapter 1. Cave-dwelling bat species...................................................................................................... 4 Fiji blossom bat .................................................................................................................................... 4 Pacific sheath-tailed bat ...................................................................................................................... 5 Fiji free-tailed bat ................................................................................................................................ 6 Chapter 2. General recommendations ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]