DOCSLIB.ORG

Saugus Iron Works National Historic Site Amphibian and Reptile Inventory March – September 2001

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Saugus Iron Works National Historic Site Amphibian and Reptile Inventory March – September 2001 National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Saugus Iron Works National Historic Site Amphibian and Reptile Inventory March – September 2001 Natural Resource Report NPS/NETN/NRR—2010/248 ON THE COVER Northern two-lined salamander - Saugus Iron Works NHS is a locally important site for this stream-dwelling salamander. Photograph by: Dave Brotherton Saugus Iron Works National Historic Site Amphibian and Reptile Inventory March – September 2001 Natural Resource Report NPS/NETN/NRR—2010/248 Robert P. Cook National Park Service Cape Cod National Seashore Wellfleet, MA 02667 David K. Brotherton Department of Herpetology Wildlife Conservation Society Bronx Zoo Bronx, NY 10460-1099 John L. Behler1 Department of Herpetology Wildlife Conservation Society Bronx Zoo Bronx, NY 10460-1099 1 deceased September 2010 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received formal peer review by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data, and whose background and expertise put them on par technically and scientifically with the authors of the information. Views, statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations, and data in this report do not necessarily reflect views and policies of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U.S. Government. This report is available from the Northeast Temperate Network, (http://science.nature.nps.gov/im/units/NETN/monitor/monitor.cfm) and the Natural Resource Publications Management website (http://www.nature.nps.gov/publications/NRPM). Please cite this publication as: Cook, R. P., D. K. Brotherton, and J. L. Behler. 2010. Saugus Iron Works National Historic Site amphibian and reptile inventory: March – September 2001. Natural Resource Report NPS/NETN/NRR—2010/248. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. NPS 444/105740, September 2010 ii Contents Tables ............................................................................................................................................. vi Figures............................................................................................................................................ vi Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... vii Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................... viii Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Study Area ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Methods........................................................................................................................................... 5 Sampling Overview .................................................................................................................... 5 Anuran Calling Surveys (ACS) .............................................................................................. 7 Time Constrained Search (TCS) ............................................................................................. 7 Stream/River TCS ................................................................................................................... 7 Woodland TCS ........................................................................................................................ 7 Field TCS ................................................................................................................................ 8 Wetland TCS ........................................................................................................................... 8 Coverboards (CB) ................................................................................................................... 8 Turtle Trap Surveys (TTS) ...................................................................................................... 8 Minnow Trap Surveys (MTS) ................................................................................................. 8 Incidental Encounters (IE) ...................................................................................................... 9 Quantifying Abundance .......................................................................................................... 9 Data Management ......................................................................................................................... 11 Supplemental Data .................................................................................................................... 11 Results ........................................................................................................................................... 13 iii Overview of Park Herpetofauna ............................................................................................... 13 Survey Method Summaries ....................................................................................................... 13 Anuran Calling Surveys ........................................................................................................ 15 Time Constrained Searches ................................................................................................... 15 Coverboards .......................................................................................................................... 15 Turtle Traps ........................................................................................................................... 15 Minnow Traps ....................................................................................................................... 16 Incidental Encounter ............................................................................................................. 16 Discussion ..................................................................................................................................... 19 Community Analysis, Factors Affecting Species Presence, and Important Habitats ............... 19 Stressors .................................................................................................................................... 20 Recommendations for Management and Future Inventory and Monitoring ............................ 22 Species Accounts .......................................................................................................................... 24 Species Recorded at SAIR ........................................................................................................ 25 Northern Two-Lined Salamander (Eurycea b. bislineata).................................................... 25 Northern Green Frog (Lithobates clamitans melanota) ........................................................ 26 Common Snapping Turtle (Chelydra s. serpentina) ............................................................. 27 Painted Turtle (Chrysemys picta) .......................................................................................... 28 Northern Brown Snake (Storeria d. dekayii) ........................................................................ 28 Common Garter Snake (Thamnophis s. sirtalis) ................................................................... 29 Eastern Milk Snake (Lampropeltis t. triangulum) ................................................................ 30 Potentially-occurring Species Never Recorded at SAIR .......................................................... 30 Eastern Red-backed Salamander (Plethodon cinereus) ........................................................ 30 iv Spring Peeper (Pseudacris crucifer) ..................................................................................... 31 American Bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) ...................................................................... 32 Northern Water Snake (Nerodia s. sipedon) ......................................................................... 32 Literature Cited ............................................................................................................................. 35 Appendix A. Records of amphibians and reptiles at and in the vicinity of Saugus Iron Works National Historic Site prior to 2001. Nyman (1991) covers the entire watershed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Natural History, Distribution, and Phenotypic Variation of Cave-Dwelling Spring Salamanders, Gyrinophilus Spp
    Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar Theses, Dissertations and Capstones 2005 The aN tural History, Distribution, and Phenotypic Variation of Cave-dwelling Spring Salamanders, Gyrinophilus spp. Cope (Plethodontidae), in West Virginia Michael Steven Osbourn Follow this and additional works at: http://mds.marshall.edu/etd Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Osbourn, Michael Steven, "The aN tural History, Distribution, and Phenotypic Variation of Cave-dwelling Spring Salamanders, Gyrinophilus spp. Cope (Plethodontidae), in West Virginia" (2005). Theses, Dissertations and Capstones. Paper 735. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Marshall Digital Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Marshall Digital Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Natural History, Distribution, and Phenotypic Variation of Cave-dwelling Spring Salamanders, Gyrinophilus spp. Cope (Plethodontidae), in West Virginia. Thesis submitted to The Graduate College of Marshall University In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Science Biological Sciences By Michael Steven Osbourn Thomas K. Pauley, Committee Chairperson Daniel K. Evans, PhD Thomas G. Jones, PhD Marshall University May 2005 Abstract The Natural History, Distribution, and Phenotypic Variation of Cave-dwelling Spring Salamanders, Gyrinophilus spp. Cope (Plethodontidae), in West Virginia. Michael S. Osbourn There are over 4000 documented caves in West Virginia, potentially providing refuge and habitat for a diversity of amphibians and reptiles. Spring Salamanders, Gyrinophilus porphyriticus, are among the most frequently encountered amphibians in caves. Surveys of 25 caves provided expanded distribution records and insight into ecology and diet of G.
    [Show full text]
  • Mercury in Northern Green Frogs and Snapping Turtles from Onondaga Lake, New York
    MERCURY IN NORTHERN GREEN FROGS AND SNAPPING TURTLES FROM ONONDAGA LAKE, NEW YORK Prepared by the New York Field Office of the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service December 2015 For the Onondaga Lake Natural Resource Damage Assessment and Restoration Trustee Council i ABSTRACT This study was conducted to develop an initial understanding of the exposure of amphibians and reptiles at Onondaga Lake to mercury (Hg). Mercury in Onondaga Lake northern green frogs is within the range of Hg concentrations shown to affect metamorphosis and survival of southern leopard frog tadpoles and metamorphs, but less than concentrations associated with effects in wood frogs and American toads. Mercury in the toenails and blood of snapping turtles from Onondaga Lake was significantly higher than Hg in the toenails and blood of Hamlin Wildlife Management Area (reference area) snapping turtles. Onondaga Lake snapping turtles have more Hg in their keratinous tissue (toenails) than other snapping turtles sampled across New York State, but less Hg than found in keratinous tissues of snapping turtles from a Hg-contaminated area in Virginia. Snapping turtles appear fairly resistant to Hg, but the Hg concentrations found in Onondaga Lake snapping turtles are within the range of concentrations associated with altered thyroid function and immune suppression in other turtle species. Although the diversity of amphibians and reptiles has increased at Onondaga Lake over the past two decades, the herpetofaunal diversity and population densities remain lower than in surrounding areas. This study shows that Hg may be a factor inhibiting the reproduction and health of some amphibians and reptiles at Onondaga Lake.
    [Show full text]
  • AMPHIBIANS of OHIO F I E L D G U I D E DIVISION of WILDLIFE INTRODUCTION
    AMPHIBIANS OF OHIO f i e l d g u i d e DIVISION OF WILDLIFE INTRODUCTION Amphibians are typically shy, secre- Unlike reptiles, their skin is not scaly. Amphibian eggs must remain moist if tive animals. While a few amphibians Nor do they have claws on their toes. they are to hatch. The eggs do not have are relatively large, most are small, deli- Most amphibians prefer to come out at shells but rather are covered with a jelly- cately attractive, and brightly colored. night. like substance. Amphibians lay eggs sin- That some of these more vulnerable spe- gly, in masses, or in strings in the water The young undergo what is known cies survive at all is cause for wonder. or in some other moist place. as metamorphosis. They pass through Nearly 200 million years ago, amphib- a larval, usually aquatic, stage before As with all Ohio wildlife, the only ians were the first creatures to emerge drastically changing form and becoming real threat to their continued existence from the seas to begin life on land. The adults. is habitat degradation and destruction. term amphibian comes from the Greek Only by conserving suitable habitat to- Ohio is fortunate in having many spe- amphi, which means dual, and bios, day will we enable future generations to cies of amphibians. Although generally meaning life. While it is true that many study and enjoy Ohio’s amphibians. inconspicuous most of the year, during amphibians live a double life — spend- the breeding season, especially follow- ing part of their lives in water and the ing a warm, early spring rain, amphib- rest on land — some never go into the ians appear in great numbers seemingly water and others never leave it.
    [Show full text]
  • Sayen Gardens Herpetological Report Manning 2015
    To Whom It May Concern, This document is a report summarizing a volunteer reptile and amphibian project performed at the request of the Township of Hamilton in Mercer County, New Jersey. The area of focus for this project was the Sayen Gardens property and the adjacent Hoagland Nursery property, both located on Hughes Drive in Hamilton. This project was officially initiated in January of 2015, although some preliminary observations were taken in October and November of 2014. This document was prepared for the Township of Hamilton. General Profile: Sayen Gardens is a municipal park and botanical garden with an area of approximately 30 acres. The features of the park include a historical house, maintenance building, several man‐made structures (including three fountain ponds), as well as a wooded area with trails, and a small section of the Miry Run Brook. The Hoagland property is the site of a former nursery with an area of approximately 5 acres. A variety of natural and man‐made habitats are present on the two properties, including a small field (Hoagland), a small deciduous forest (both), a stream (Sayen), and several ponds (Sayen). There are three naturally occurring intermittent ponds, one of which was observed with an obligate vernal pool species (the wood frog, Lithobates sylvaticus) breeding in it. The properties are located on the physiographic region known as the Inner Coastal Plain. General Fauna Profile: The Sayen property provides a variety of habitats for native fauna to flourish. Many species of invertebrates have been observed in the park. Checking under debris reveals centipedes, slugs, earthworms, pillbugs, ants, and harvestmen.
    [Show full text]
  • AMPHIBIAN INDEX of BIOTIC INTEGRITY for WETLANDS Ohio EPA Technical Report WET/2011-1
    State of Ohio Wetland Ecology Group Environmental Protection Agency Division of Surface Water FIELD MANUAL FOR THE AMPHIBIAN INDEX OF BIOTIC INTEGRITY FOR WETLANDS Ohio EPA Technical Report WET/2011-1 John Kasich, Governor Scott J. Nally, Director State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency P.O. Box 1049, Lazarus Government Center, 50 West Town Street, Columbus, Ohio 43216-1049 This page intentionally left blank. Appropriate Citation: Micacchion, Mick. 2011. Field Manual for the Amphibian Index of Biotic Integrity (AmphIBI) for Wetlands. Ohio EPA Technical Report WET/2011-1. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Wetland Ecology Group, Division of Surface Water, Columbus, Ohio. This entire document can be downloaded from the website of the Ohio EPA, Division of Surface Water: http://www.epa.ohio.gov/dsw/wetlands/WetlandEcologySection_reports.aspx i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS………………………………………………………………….……...ii ABSTRACT………………………………………………………………………………..…….iv INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………….…….…….1 APPROPRIATE WETLANDS FOR AMPHIBI MONITORING………………….………….…1 SEASONAL HYDROLOGY……………………………………………….…………….2 PRECIPITATION OR GROUND WATER HYDROLOGY…………….……………….2 ABSENCE OF PREDATORY FISH SPECIES………………………………………..…2 CLOSE PROXIMITY TO APPROPRIATE UPLAND HABITAT…………………...….3 CLOSE PROXIMITY TO OTHER BREEDING POOLS……………………………..…3 MONITORING PROTOCOLS…………………………………………………………………...4 TRAP CONSTRUCTION……………………………………………………………………...…4 TRAP PLACEMENT……………………………………………………………………..………5 TRAP RETRIEVAL………………………………………………………………………………8 SPECIMEN HANDLING AND
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibians Among Road-Rut Pools in West Virginia Abby L
    Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar Theses, Dissertations and Capstones 2018 Amphibians Among Road-Rut Pools in West Virginia Abby L. Sinclair [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://mds.marshall.edu/etd Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, Population Biology Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Sinclair, Abby L., "Amphibians Among Road-Rut Pools in West Virginia" (2018). Theses, Dissertations and Capstones. 1202. https://mds.marshall.edu/etd/1202 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Marshall Digital Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Marshall Digital Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. AMPHIBIANS AMONG ROAD-RUT POOLS IN WEST VIRGINIA A thesis submitted to the Graduate College of Marshall University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science In Biological Sciences by Abby L. Sinclair Approved by Dr. Thomas K. Pauley, Committee Chairperson Dr. Jayme L. Waldron Dr. Shane Welch Marshall University December 2018 ii © 2018 Abby L. Sinclair ALL RIGHTS RESERVED iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my educators. Dr. Jayme Waldron assisted me with many of my statistics and often let me tag along to new experiences, being an assistant in the herpetology lab and field work in South Carolina. Dr. Shane Welch also guided me during my thesis and encouraged me to think deeper. I would like to thank and give my upmost gratitude to Dr. Thomas Pauley. With the patience of Job, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F Wildlife Species List
    GRAND RENEWABLE ENERGY PARK NATURAL HERITAGE ASSESSMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY Appendix F Wildlife Species List GRAND RENEWABLE ENERGY PARK NATURAL HERITAGE ASSESSMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY Appendix F1 Wildlife Species List - Wind Project Local Status GLOBAL AREA PIF Priority COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME ONTARIO STATUS STATUS COSSARO COSEWIC (ha) REGION Species Comment BUTTERFLIES Cabbage White Pieris rapae SNA G5 Clouded Sulphur Colias philodice S5 G5 Spring Azure Celastrina ladon S5 G5 Mourning Cloak Nymphalis antiopa S5 G5 Monarch Danaus plexippus S4B, S2N G5 SC SC AMPHIBIANS American Toad Anaxyrus americanus S5 G5 Tetraploid Gray Treefrog Hyla versicolor S5 G5 Western Chorus Frog (carolinian) Pseudacris triseriata S4 G5 NAR NAR Spring Peeper Pseudacris crucifer S5 G5 Northern Green Frog Lithobates clamitans S5 G5 Wood Frog Lithobates sylvatica S5 G5 Northern Leopard Frog Lithobates pipiens S5 G5 NAR NAR REPTILES Snapping Turtle Chelydra serpentina S3 G5 SC SC Eastern Gartersnake Thamnophis sirtalis S5 G5 BIRDS Canada Goose Branta canadensis S5 G5 Wood Duck Aix sponsa S5 G5 Mallard Anas platyrhynchos S5 G5 Wild Turkey Meleagris gallopava S5 G5 Great Blue Heron Ardea herodias S5 G5 Turkey Vulture Cathartes aura S5B G5 Northern Harrier Circus cyaneus S4B G5 NAR NAR 55 X Non-breeding; observed September 30 Sharp-shinned Hawk Accipiter striatus S5 G5 NAR NAR 20-30 Cooper's Hawk Accipiter cooperii S4 G5 NAR NAR 4-50+ Red-tailed Hawk Buteo jamaicensis S5 G5 NAR NAR Rough-legged Hawk Buteo lagopus S1B, S4N G5 NAR NAR Non-breeding;
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Amphibians in Great Smoky Mountains National Park by C
    Monitoring Amphibians in Great Smoky Mountains National Park By C. Kenneth Dodd, Jr. — Abstract — a national amphibian monitoring program on Federal lands, to develop the sampling techniques and bio- Amphibian species have inexplicably declined metrical analyses necessary to determine status and or disappeared in many regions of the world, and in trends, and to identify possible causes of amphibian some instances, serious malformations have been declines and malformations. observed. In the United States, amphibian declines The biological importance of Great Smoky frequently have occurred even in protected areas. Mountains National Park has been recognized by its Causes for the declines and malformations probably designation as an International Biosphere Reserve. are varied and may not even be related. The seem- As such, it is clearly the leading region of signifi- ingly sudden declines in widely separated areas, how- cance for amphibian research. Although no other ever, suggests a need to monitor amphibian region shares the wealth of amphibians as found in populations as well as identify the causes when the Great Smokies (31 species of salamanders, and declines or malformations are discovered. 13 of frogs), the entire southern and mid-section of In 2000, the President of the United States and the Appalachian Mountain chain is characterized by Congress directed Department of the Interior (DOI) a high diversity of amphibians, and inventories and agencies to develop a plan to monitor the trends in monitoring protocols developed in the Smokies likely amphibian populations on DOI lands and to conduct will be applicable to other Appalachian National Park research into possible causes of declines.
    [Show full text]
  • Registration Document Section
    FINAL REPORT 5.0 EXISTING ENVIRONMENT 5.1 Geology The bedrock of Nova Scotia contains an abundance of salt formations. Salt is mined by underground methods and by solution mining methods. The thickness, depth of burial and amount of structural deformation of salt formations varies considerably throughout the province. Salt formations which are suitable for gas storage in caverns must meet several criteria. The formations must be thick enough to easily accommodate the space required for storage caverns within the upper and lower boundaries of the salt. Also, the salt must be buried at a sufficient depth to withstand high pressure natural gas; the deeper the depth of burial, the higher the maximum allowable pressure, which improves the economics of a gas storage project. Finally, the structural deformation of the salt, which takes place over geological time, cannot be too severe, otherwise caverns will not form in an anticipated shape, in accordance with the geotechnical design, which maximizes strength and stability of the cavern. Many of the salt formations in Nova Scotia, such as in Pugwash, Nepan and Cape Breton, are highly deformed and folded and are not suitable for natural gas storage. The Alton Project area is underlain by the Shubenacadie – Stewiacke basin, which contains a large, flat-lying bedded salt formation referred to as the Stewiacke formation, which is part of the Windsor Group. This basin has been described by R.C. Boehner (1986) as: “The deposit’s thickness, its relatively undisturbed nature, its great lateral extent and reasonable depth, and the virtual absence of salt springs, all favor use for the future development of mines and underground storage facilities.” This description indicates potential for underground storage of gas in the Shubenacadie – Stewiacke basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography of the Anurans of the United States and Canada. Version 2, Updated and Covering the Period 1709 – 2012
    January 2018 Open Access Publishing Volume 13, Monograph 7 A female Western Toad (Anaxyrus boreas) from Garibaldi Provincial Park, British Columbia, Canada. This large bufonid occurs throughout much of Western North America. The IUCN lists it as Near Threatened because it is probably in significant decline (> 30% over 10 years) due to disease.(Photographed by C. Kenneth Dodd). Bibliography of the Anurans of the United States and Canada. Version 2, Updated and Covering the Period 1709 – 2012. Monograph 7. C. Kenneth Dodd, Jr. ISSN: 1931-7603 Indexed by: Zoological Record, Scopus, Current Contents / Agriculture, Biology & Environmental Sciences, Journal Citation Reports, Science Citation Index Extended, EMBiology, Biology Browser, Wildlife Review Abstracts, Google Scholar, and is in the Directory of Open Access Journals. BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE ANURANS OF THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA. VERSION 2, UPDATED AND COVERING THE PERIOD 1709 – 2012. MONOGRAPH 7. C. KENNETH DODD, JR. Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA 32611. Copyright © 2018. C. Kenneth Dodd, Jr. All Rights Reserved. Please cite this monograph as follows: Dodd, C. Kenneth, Jr. 2018. Bibliography of the anurans of the United States and Canada. Version 2, Updated and Covering the Period 1709 - 2012. Herpetological Conservation and Biology 13(Monograph 7):1-328. Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS i PREFACE ii ABSTRACT 1 COMPOSITE BIBLIOGRAPHIC TRIVIA 1 LITERATURE CITED 2 BIBLIOGRAPHY 2 FOOTNOTES 325 IDENTICAL TEXTS 325 CATALOGUE OF NORTH AMERICAN AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES 326 ADDITIONAL ANURAN-INCLUSIVE BIBLIOGRAPHIES 326 AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY 328 i Preface to Version 2: An Expanded and Detailed Resource. MALCOLM L.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Crossings: a Study on Reducing Highway 49 Wildlife
    Alternative Crossings: A Study On Reducing Highway 49 Wildlife Mortalities Through The Horicon Marsh Prepared By: Bradley Wolf, Pa Houa Lee, Stephanie Marquardt, & Michelle Zignego Table of Contents Chapter 1: Horicon Marsh Background ........................................................................................................ 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 1 History of the Horicon Marsh and Highway 49 ......................................................................................... 2 Geography of the Horicon Marsh ............................................................................................................. 4 Chapter 2: Natural History of Target Species ............................................................................................... 6 Methodology ............................................................................................................................................. 6 Literature Review ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Natural History of the Muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus) ............................................................................... 7 Natural History of the Canada Goose (Branta canadensis) ...................................................................... 9 Natural History of Least Bittern (Ixobrychus exilis) ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACTS 29 Reptile Ecology I, Highland A, Sunday 15 July 2018
    THE JOINT MEETING OF ASIH SSAR HL lcHTHYOLOGISTS & HERPETOLOGISTS ROCHESTER, NEW YORK 2018 ABSTRACTS 29 Reptile Ecology I, Highland A, Sunday 15 July 2018 Curtis Abney, Glenn Tattersall and Anne Yagi Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada Thermal Preference and Habitat Selection of Thamnophis sirtalis sirtalis in a Southern Ontario Peatland Gartersnakes represent the most widespread reptile in North America. Despite occupying vastly different biogeoclimatic zones across their range, evidence suggests that the thermal preferenda (Tset) of gartersnakes has not diverged significantly between populations or different Thamnophis species. The reason behind gartersnake success could lie in their flexible thermoregulatory behaviours and habitat selection. We aimed to investigate this relationship by first identifying the Tset of a common gartersnake species (Thamnophis sirtalis sirtalis) via a thermal gradient. We then used this Tset parameter as a baseline for calculating the thermal quality of an open, mixed, and forested habitat all used by the species. We measured the thermal profiles of these habitats by installing a series of temperature-recording analogues that mimicked the reflectance and morphology of living gartersnakes and recorded environmental temperatures as living snakes experience them. Lastly, we used coverboards to survey the current habitat usage of T. s. sirtalis. Of the three habitats, we found that the open habitat offered the highest thermal quality throughout the snake’s active season. In contrast, we recorded the greatest number of snakes using the mixed habitat which had considerably lower thermal quality. Although the open habitat offered the greatest thermal quality, we regularly recorded temperatures exceeding the upper range of the animals’ thermal preference.
    [Show full text]